(NAPS) Guidelines On Premenstrual Syndrome
(NAPS) Guidelines On Premenstrual Syndrome
(NAPS) Guidelines On Premenstrual Syndrome
(NAPS)
Guidelines on Premenstrual Syndrome
Nick Panay
BSc MRCOG MFSRH
NAPS Guidelines on Guidelines on Premenstrual Syndrome
Ovarian suppression
Although the underlying cause of severe PMS remains unknown, cyclical ovarian activity appears to be an
important factor. A logical treatment for severe PMS, therefore, is to suppress ovulation and thus suppress
the cyclical endocrine/biochemical changes which cause the distressing symptoms. A number of drugs are
capable of performing this function, but they are not without their own side-effects which may influence
the efficacy of the treatment or the duration for which they may be given.
Transdermal estradiol*
Placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that implanted and transdermal (patch) 17β estradiol combined
with cyclical progestogen is effective for the management of physical and psychological symptoms of se-
vere PMS. Implants are less commonly used for PMS since patches have become available due to their
long lasting effects. A recently concluded study from the author‟s unit has shown benefits of 100mcg
patches over placebo with benefits lasting up to 14 months. Additional barrier or intrauterine methods of
contraception should be used when estradiol (patches and implant) are used in PMS as ovulation suppres-
sion cannot be guaranteed. There are insufficient data to confirm long-term endometrial and breast safety
because long-term randomised prospective safety studies are lacking. However, logic dictates that the hor-
monal environment is not significantly different from how it would otherwise be in this premenopausal
population and observation has not shown any problems over 20 years of usage.
Recommendation A:
Percutaneous estradiol, either as an implant or as a patch, combined with cyclical progestogen, has
been shown to be effective for the management of physical and psychological symptoms of severe
PMS.
Progestogen intolerance
Use of continuous estradiol normally necessitates the addition of cyclical progestogen (10 - 12 days) to
avoid endometrial build-up in women who have a uterus. The progestogen releasing system (Mirena) can
maximise efficacy by minimising PMS-like adverse effects. Even the low systemic levels of levonorgestrel
released by the Mirena, can initially produce PMS-type adverse effects in the progestogen intolerant
woman. Despite this, it might still be of advantage to use a Mirena or vaginal progesterone (Cyclogest pes-
saries or Crinone gel 8% – not licensed for this indication) in the progestogen intolerant woman.
Recommendation: A
When treating women with PMS, treatment with the lowest possible dose of progestogen is recom-
mended to minimise adverse effects.
DanazolHS
Cycle suppression may be achieved using Danazol, an androgenic steroid. Studies have demonstrated bene-
fit for several symptoms, but due to masculinizing side-effects, especially at higher, cycle-suppressing
doses, it is not commonly used.
Recommendation: A
Effective in PMS but side effects and risks outweigh benefits
When treating women with PMS, with GnRHa therapy, treatment should only be continued for 6 months
when used alone. Treatment should be combined with HRT to reduce bone density loss. Women on long-
term treatment should have annual measurement of bone mineral density (ideally by dual energy X-ray ab-
sorptiometry). Treatment should be stopped if bone density declines significantly in scans performed one
year apart. General advice about how exercise, diet and smoking affect bone mineral density should be
given.
Recommendation A
GnRH analogue therapy results in profound cycle suppression and elimination of premenstrual
symptoms. Lack of effectiveness suggests a questionable diagnosis rather than a limitation of ther-
apy.
ProgesteroneIE and ProgestogensIE
A recent meta-analysis of all published studies for progestogen and progesterone treatment of PMS demon-
strated no benefit for treatment. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of pro-
gesterone and progestogens in the management of premenstrual syndrome. All the trials of progesterone
(by both routes of administration) showed no clinically significant difference between progesterone and
placebo. The findings of this study were not entirely surprising. Synthetic progestogens actually have PMS-
like side effects! Natural progesterone could actually have some benefits as it can have an anxiolytic effect
and act as a mild diuretic. Some women find it very therapeutic, even over long periods of time. However,
of the few underpowered studies conducted only one has shown benefit and better data are needed.
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo Provera), Etonorgestrel rods (Implanon) and the ovulation sup-
pressing progestogen-only pill (Cerazette) all have ovulation suppressant activity. However, cyclical symp-
toms can be replaced by continuous low grade symptoms due to the PMS-like side-effects of synthetic pro-
gestogens. Data regarding efficacy are therefore either absent or at best contradictory.
Recommendation Ia A:
There are insufficient data to recommend the routine use of progestogens or natural progesterone in
the treatment of PMS.
Hysterectomy
Total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the ultimate form of ovulation sup-
pression and the only true cure for PMS as this removes the ovarian cycle completely. The procedure is
only rarely performed for this indication, as a lesser alternative can usually be found. When treating women
with PMS, surgery should not be contemplated without pre-operative use of GnRH analogues as a test of
cure and to ensure that HRT is tolerated. Such therapy should be reserved for sufferers of extremely severe
PMS in whom other treatment has failed. When appropriately targeted, this intervention can have life al-
tering benefits. It is essential that adequate hormone therapy is given (including consideration of testoster-
one replacement) to prevent simply replacing one set of symptoms with another. Women who have had a
hysterectomy with ovarian conservation will often continue to have cyclical symptoms in the absence of
menstruation.
Recommendation C:
When treating women with severe PMS, hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy has been
shown to be of benefit.
The importance of this is that PMS sufferers are less likely to develop dependence on this regimen, benefit
is immediate and women are more likely to accept the treatment as it can be regarded as being different
from the regimens used for psychiatric disorders. In the author‟s opinion, the optimum regimens for PMS
are half-cycle citalopram or escitalopram, 20mg per day from day 15 to day 28 of the cycle. This regimen
appears to be effective even in women whose previous SSRI treatment has failed. Severe PMS also im-
proves significantly with either luteal-phase or symptom-onset dosing of escitalopram with good tolerabil-
ity.
Recommendation A:
In view of their proven efficacy and safety in adults, SSRIs should be considered one of the first line
pharmaceutical management options in severe PMS.
A recent study examined the relative effectiveness of fluoxetine (20 mg daily) and cognitive behavioural
therapy (CBT) (ten sessions), and combined therapy (fluoxetine plus CBT) in women with Premenstrual
Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). This was a randomised treatment trial lasting 6 months; follow-up was un-
dertaken 1 year post-treatment. Significant improvement occurred in all three treatment groups after 6
months of treatment. Fluoxetine was associated with a more rapid improvement but at follow-up, CBT was
associated with better maintenance of treatment effects compared with fluoxetine. There appeared to be no
additional benefit of combining the treatments and no difference in efficacy between the treatment groups.
A clinical psychology service should be available for women with PMS, ideally as part of the MDT.
Recommendation A:
When treating women with severe PMS, cognitive behavioural therapy should be considered rou-
tinely as a treatment option.
Ia Evidence obtained from meta-analysis of random- Requires at least one randomised controlled trial
ised controlled trials. A as part of a body of literature of overall good
quality and consistency addressing the specific
Ib Evidence obtained from at least one randomised recommendations (Evidence levels 1a, 1b)
controlled trial.
Requires the availability of well-controlled clini-
IIa Evidence obtained from at least one well-designed B cal studies but no randomised clinical trials on
Controlled study without randomisation the topic of recommendations.
(Evidence levels IIa, IIb, III)
IIb Evidence obtained from at least one other type of
well-designed quasi-experimental study. Requires evidence obtained from expert commit-
C tee reports or opinions and/or clinical experi-
III Evidence obtained from well-designed non-experi ences of respected authorities. Indicates an ab-
mental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, sence of directly applicable clinical studies of
correlation studies and case studies. good quality. (Evidence level IV)
Type Definition
Mi l d to m o d er a t e P M S
S tr e s s m a n a g e m e n t C o m p l e m e n ta r y T h e r a p i e s V i ta m i n s & M i n e r a l s
Relaxation / Yoga / meditation / Agnus Castus 20 -40mg / day Vitamin B6 max 50mg/day (with GP
breathing techniques supervision)
Red Clover Isoflavones 40 – 80mg /
Counselling /Support day Magnesium 250mg/day,
St John’s Wort (beware drug interac- Calcium 1g/day + Vitamin D 10 mcg/
Family / friends / tions)
professional counsellor/ NAPS day especially for migraine
M o d er at e t o s ev er e P MS
PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH CY CL E S UP P RE S S I O N
R e s i s ta n t P M S o r p e r s i s te n t p r o g e s to g e n i c s i d e - e f f e c t s — r e fe r to g y n a e c o l o g i s t
Surgery
H y s te r e c to m y a n d BS O + o e s tr a d i o l + / - te s to s te r o n e HRT
Published by NAPS with special thanks to Nick Panay (Content), Moira Feehily (Design), Jackie Howe (Editing),
TMS Print Shop, 94 Commercial Road, Paddock Wood, Kent TN12 6DP