E Learning Reference PDF
E Learning Reference PDF
E Learning Reference PDF
ABSTRACT
E-Learning can be viewed as an innovative approach for delivering well-designed, learner-
centered, interactive and facilitated environments to anyone, any place, anytime by utilizing
the attributes and resources of various digital technologies along with other forms of learning
materials that are suited for open, flexible and distributed learning environments. The role of
learning management system (LMS) in pedagogical practices has expanded in recent years.
Blended Learning which uses education technology tools is proving to be influential in helping
both students and teachers to flipped their classroom management from didactic approach
towards blended learning through LMS that is more student-centered and constructivist. This
study was conducted in order to aid the encountered problems based on the gathered data and
aimed to address the cited issues, inadequacies and problems that were gathered by the
proponent and improve the methodological aspect of teaching-learning system by developing
a new approach in delivering education through web-based scheme. Also, this research is
bound to know the readiness, acceptability, and effectiveness of the proposed IT Capstone
Project under certain formulated criteria such as Functionality, Usability, Reliability,
Performance, and Supportability (FURPS) and to show comparison between the effectiveness
of face-to-face learning-teaching compared to a blended learning environment in Pamantasan
ng Lungsod ng Pasig (University of Pasig).
1. INTRODUCTION
We are living in the techno-era. The time has been changing rapidly if we compare it
with ancient times. Various techniques have been discovered in the area of educational learning
with a view of time saving and getting good results.
Technology has blurred all the boundaries across the globe. It has an intensive impact
on learning. As we are aware that our life is totally dependent on electronic devices for whole
24 hours every now and then from morning to night. Technology for learning is used in the
collection, processing, transmission, and interpretation of information. Human learning
capacity can be enhanced with the optimum use of various technologies but need effective
training. Technology is changing all aspects of human life from A to Z.
Educational institutions, through its school administrators and information technology
personnel, have developed various application enhancements regarding learning that will
narrow the gap between the institution's stakeholders – students, faculty members, and
administrators. Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig, the sole local university in the city of Pasig,
has already developed systems for the improvement of the traditional educational methods such
as enrollment, student registration system, and so on. However, the university has not yet
• To assess if there is a significant difference between the existing system and the
proposed system as evaluated by the respondent's system in terms of Functionality,
Usability, Reliability, Performance, and Supportability.
The following the related studies and researches of several authors who studied and
researched the same concept.
Ballesterol, et. al (2010) developed an LMS for Technological University of the Philippines
(TUP). The study saw that there is a need to employ a distance education in TUP Manila,
specifically on Bachelor of Technology major in Information Technology programs through
the implementation of e-learning and saw a potential of applying an LMS. The developed
system used open source technologies like HTML, CSS, JavaScript, PHP, MySQL, Apache
and x7Chat. The developed system serves as an aid for students and professors of the mentioned
program. It was evaluated by fifteen respondents composed of five students, five professors
and five technical experts who are randomly selected in the TUP campus and in the industry.
The system’s performance was also evaluated through to the Philippines Web Awards’
indicators, namely: design, content, usability, and functionality. The result of evaluation shows
that the developed system was “Very Acceptable.”
Likewise, Doctor (2012) developed the Academic Resource Expert (ARX) System. Its
main objective is to provide an integrated system for academic processes which integrates
educational institutions independent information systems as solutions for their problems
towards effectiveness and efficient institutional processes, redundancy of data, accessibility,
and reliability of information. The developed system is intended to be implemented in different
educational institutions that use independent information systems or to those that have no
information systems for academic processes at all. Its features are composed of different
academic modules namely: examination management system that facilitates creation of
examination, collections of examination answers, auto-marking and submission of scores to
the electronic class record and produce printable reports; e-learning management system that
helps students and teachers collaboration in terms of learning materials and online
consultations; student grading system that provides electronic class record and seat plan;
faculty loading of subjects; has student enrollment; content management of web site;
information banking of employee and student information; and management of different user
accounts that provides privileges. It was also built using various open sources technologies
such as PHP, HTML, CSS, XAMPP, JavaScript, and MySQL. It was tested based on the
academic standards of Lyceum of the Philippines University, Cavite campus. The system was
rated "Excellent" with a mean average of 4.79 by the respondents that include IT Experts,
Faculty, Registrar, Human Resource, Student Admission Staff and the Dean for College of
Engineering, which proves that the system can be a useful tool for educational institutions
academic processes.
Additionally, according to PinoyTechBlog (2014), entitled “Moodle: Open Source E-
Learning in the Philippines” mentioned the following:
First, among the open source greats is a learning management system (LMS) called
Moodle. With the cheap PC and connectivity projects, we may have found an answer to a
problem that is education.
Second, Moodle has been adopted by many educational institutions worldwide and is
steadily gaining prominence in the Philippines. Among its features are lessons, quizzes, forums
and reports just to name a few. And since it is open source, everything is customizable. There
is a friendly forum for support at the site. Going further, it may even spur some IT businesses
such as consultancy and tech support which can also offer services to international Moodle
users.
Currently, De La Salle schools, Ateneo de Manila, St. Paul, Xavier, SEAMCO, UPOU,
People Support and several other institutions are using Moodle as their platform of choice for e-
Learning.
While the study of Marcial (2010), entitled "E-Learning 4-All: The SOUL Model"
claims that Virtual - Class is a course management system that aims to provide enhanced and
innovative teaching and learning experiences to all Sillimanians. The system can handle classes
virtually.
E-Learning is categorized into two subsystems that cater to two groups of learners.
First, E-Learn-P is a distance education program that caters to all individuals who wish to earn
non-professional degrees but is not able to take advantage of traditional modes of education.
This subsystem provides alternative opportunities to aspiring online learners who wish to enroll
in quality programs responsive to the demand for national development. Second, E-Learn-T is
a learning management system that caters to any individual who hopes to acquire specific areas
of learning through personalized electronic and online tutoring services but is not able to take
advantage of the traditional modes of tutoring.
New communication and information technologies have become major resources for
teaching and learning in higher education. An article published by Glencoe on Teaching
Integration Strategies states that the use of technology has a positive impact on students’
learning only when applied and utilized effectively. It can:
• Increase student motivation for learning,
• Improve communication of learning goals,
• Facilitate higher-order thinking skills,
• Build valuable skills that students will use in college and in the workplace
• Expand students' understanding from novice to mastery.
Silliman University (SU) is among the many educational institutions that wanted to
change students learning through electronic learning. In August 2008, the Silliman Online
University Learning (SOUL) system was launched and institutionalized by the University.
In addition to local related literature based from the Philippines E-Learning Society
Online Journal (PeLS), written by Quimbo (2009), entitled “Teachers’ Perspectives of the
Quality of E-Learning Courseware Integration in the Secondary Curriculum”, stated that an e-
learning material that had provided the greatest impact on student psychomotor domain,
followed by affective domain, then by cognitive domain. In the psychomotor domain, the
findings show that apart from directly improving student skills in using the computer, teachers
believe that e-learning has given students the opportunity to acquire the ability to access
information and use the information as study materials at the same time.
On the affective domain, e-learning is perceived by teachers to have made the greatest
impact in developing a positive attitude among students toward the major subject areas,
engaging students to stay on-task, improving student confidence toward learning, and
facilitating collaborative work among students. On the whole, e-learning makes an important
contribution to the development of a positive attitude among students not only toward major
subject areas but also toward the entire learning process. It has also facilitated collaborative
learning, which has been found to effectively enhance and improve knowledge acquisition and
positive learning behavioral change.
On the cognitive domain, e-learning is perceived by teachers to have brought the
greatest impact among students in improving knowledge acquisition, reducing Mathematics
anxiety, and increasing the emphasis on individualized instruction. These results indicate how
e-learning is perceived by teachers as having made an important contribution to knowledge
acquisition in major subject areas and as having helped teachers put the students at the center
of the learning environment.
This local study was excerpted from the University of Southern Mindanao – Graduate
School Website, Vasquez, Ed.D and Tabora Ph.D. (2014), entitled “Comparative Study of e-
Learning Approach and Traditional Approach”.
The study was conducted to determine the effect of teaching approaches in Central
Mindanao Computer School, Mlang Cotabato, Philippines. Specifically, this research aimed to
determine the effectiveness of the traditional method and the e-Learning method in teaching
Introductory Accounting Part I Course and compare the difference in the achievement of
students in the traditional method and those in the e-Learning method in teaching.
and provides users with a single interface. A student portal is a web-based interface to access
personalized information, resources, applications, and education/academic options with which
students can reach a range of internal and external sources through a network connection in a
password-protected setting.
However, another suggestion was made by Kaur (2017) in his study entitled “Deployment
of Cloud in Blended Learning Environment to Enhance Academic Quality: An Indian Perspective”
coined that blended learning is considered to be an emerging teaching practice of mixed learning
environments for educational transfer. The technological backbone of blended learning is cloud
computing. Blended learning with cloud enables the learner to access all the resources and applications
as services anywhere and anytime. Cloud Computing is becoming an adaptable technology in the field
of education with its active scalability and virtualization. Implementing blended learning approach
under the umbrella of a cloud platform can reduce cost and provides security and compatibility.
Furthermore, in the study conducted by Radenković, Despotović-Zrakić, Barać3,
Bogdanović, and Milić (2011) entitled “Web Portal for Adaptive E-learning” claims that
educational web portal is a single access point to all relevant information, resources, and
applications in the education process. Web portal integrates different functionalities and
services for adaptation of e-learning courses with existing learning management system.
Integration includes educational web portal users, information, processes and software
platforms used in an e-learning system. We describe the architecture of the portal for adaptive
E-learning, technologies, design, and techniques applied in the implementation of portal's key
components.
E-education systems provide various types of learning resources: tutorials, e-books,
scientific articles, etc. Discovering adequate learning materials becomes one of the key issues
in these systems. At the same time, each learning resource has some specific characteristics,
when it comes to the way of presentation, areas of interest, the structure of content, etc.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) stand out as the most appropriate software solution for
the implementation of re-education. Learning Management Systems are environments that
enable users to create, insert, manage, search and reuse small units of content and learning
objects. Currently, there are many different LMS platforms. Moodle LMS has been used in
Laboratory for e-business, University of Belgrade, for conducting courses at all study levels.
This system is used by more than 700 students, every year. According to numerous researches,
Moodle is one of the LMSs with the most functionalities and services. Moodle is flexible for
implementing new components and integration with other systems and technologies.
Based on the related studies, these are the proponent’s findings that learner experiences
of an e-learning feature took a learner-centered and holistic approach which aimed to capture
the richness and complexity of the learners’ experience. The review established that:
• Technology use is pervasive and integrative. Learners make frequent use of technology
at home and within their learning institution.
• Learners primarily use technology in order to access information, the dominance of in
ternet and browsing such as
Google and Wikipedia in everyday life is reflected in the choices learners make about
how to find information.
• Similarly, personalization and choice are core elements of technology use in learner's
everyday lives that they expect to transfer to their study is more enjoyable and
convenient.
• Learners are involved in an underworld of informal learning, making use of social
networking sites and instant messaging systems.
Knowledge Requirements
• PLP information
• Learning Management
System(LMS) concepts
• DBMS and CMS principles
• Google search results
• Analysis/
Software Requirements Planning An E-classroom
• PHP, Laravel Framework, • Designing Management
MySQL, HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, • Development With Performance
Javascript, jQuery • Testing and Feedback Mechanism
• Web browser, Sublime Text, Revision
XAMPP, web hosting System
• Statistical
Analysis for Pamantasan ng
Hardware Requirements • Report Lungsod ng Pasig (PLP)
• Desktop computer/ Laptop Generation
with the following
specifications:
o 2 GB RAM (*at least)
o Intel Core i3
microprocessor*
o 3mbps Internet
connection*
Feedback
Figure 1. Context diagram for E-classroom Management System for Pamantasan ng Lungsod
ng Pasig (PLP).
Figure 1 explains the conceptual model of the study. It shows the different stages
involved in order to achieve the objectives of this study.
Fig. 2 shows the context level data flow diagram of the said project. It presents the over
view of the data/ information flow into and out from the system respectively, it also displays
the general scheme of the project whereas it presents all the entities namely admin, instructor,
and students along with their main activities with respect to the system.
7. METHODS OF RESEARCH
In this study, the opponent used Descriptive (Qualitative and Quantitative) Research
Method wherein the study used research question, design, and data analysis that would be
applied to a given topic. This method is very important and convenient for the proponents to
show the existing system works as well as to identify the problems thereof encountered in
utilizing the current system. It involves gathering data, analysis, and presentation of the existing
system. In the descriptive method, it can involve collections of quantitative information that
can be tabulated along a continuum in numerical forms, such as scores on a test or the number
of times a person chooses to use a certain feature of a multimedia program, or it can describe
categories of information such as gender or patterns of interaction when using technology in a
group situation. Descriptive research involves gathering data that describe events and then
organizes, tabulates, depicts, and describes the data collection.
A survey was conducted among the beneficiaries of the proposed system and that would be
students and IT professionals of Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig. With the help of the survey,
the proponents are able to concentrate in the specific areas on where the solutions to be
addressed to the encountered problems thereof. These findings were all about the existing
practices done in the traditional approach of education which are obtained with the use of the
survey method. The results and findings of the study should be compared with the existing
system to evaluate how effective is the proposed system and be an advantage integrating
technology enabled system with the traditional current system.
8.1.1. Established from the gathered data, the problems can be categorically summarized
as follows:
a. Class Organization/ Management - The classroom should be arranged to promote
effective learning and minimize behavior problems. The classroom should also be
flexible to allow for different types of learning activities.
b. Class Participation - Students must be able to see and hear instruction and have
efficient access to learning materials.
c. Class Monitoring - The teacher should be able to easily monitor students and
provide feedback.
8.1.2. As regards the readiness of the respondents and as presented, analyzed and
interpreted it shows that more than half of the respondents strongly agreed that they
are ready integrating the proposed system in their context of pedagogy. And almost
1/3 of the respondents are ready, agreeing in the criterion thereof, while, less than
10 percent are in neutral to the idea. These findings are supported by the obtained
composite percentage average scores of 53.3, 37.9 and 9.7 percent respectively.
On the other hand, the acceptance of the respondents of the proposed system
confirms that they strongly agree and accept the integration of the proposed system.
In conclusion, there are composite percentages of 53, 36.4 and 10.5 percent who
strongly agreed, agreed and in neutral perception respectively which means that an
estimated 2/3 of the respondents are in accord accepting the proposed system.
Table 1
8.1.3. Based from the gathered and presented data, the existing system is still effective but
there are profound issues stated in the statement of the problem that needs to address
and resolve. There are issues most common and can be categorically stated as class
organization/ management, class participation, and class monitoring. However, this
study proposes a tool that could resolve or at least minimized the said issues and
inadequacies.
8.1.4. Based on the issues, inadequacies, and problems presented, the following are the
proposed features and modules that would address the following issues and
inadequacies and problems stated.
• Learning Management System;
Copyright 2017 GMP Press and Printing (http://buscompress.com/journal-home.html)
ISSN: 2304-1013 (Online); 2304-1269 (CDROM); 2414-6722 (Print)
Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, Vol. 6, Supplementary Issue 1 242
• Grade Recorder;
• Descriptive Analytics;
• SMS Technology.
8.1.5. The system development tool by the proponents.Adaptive software development is
a design principle used by the proponents for the creation of the proposed system.
The principle focuses on the rapid creation and evolution of software systems.
8.1.6. Summary of findings as to the perception of the respondents between the existing
and the proposed system. Based on the resulted product of the survey, it shows that
there is no significant difference when it comes to the effectiveness of the existing
system and proposed system shows an overall composite mean perception of the
respondents rated 3.78 and 4.36 which means "Effective" respectively. This was
evaluated by the respondents in accordance with the criteria given. These criteria
are content of information characteristics, instructional design and presentation,
class interaction aspects, methodological aspects and learning outcomes with the
composite mean scores of 3.84, and 3.69 for the existing system, while, there are
composite mean scores of 4.20 and 4.51 for the proposed system which are all
interprets as "Effective" correspondingly, except from the composite mean rated as
4.51 which is rated as "Very Effective" from the proposed system. Based on the
outcome of the computed means of both existing system and proposed system, it
shows that even if there is a significant difference from the weighted mean of each
criterion as it was compared the results both systems can still be interpreted as
"Effective." From these results, it can be drawn the essential contribution of the
proposed system as it would be integrated into the traditional context of the
educational system.
Table 2
8.1.7. To evaluate the system, the researcher chose FURPS guideline criteria which
consist of the following criteria in evaluating the proposed systems:
• Functionality • Performance
• Usability • Supportability
• Reliability
From the evaluation gathered from the users, the proposed system was given a
rate of 4.76 in terms of functionality, 4.65 for usability criteria, 4.45 for system
reliability, and 4.79 for performance, and 4.61 for system security. Referring to the
general mean as presented in Table 26. The proposed system has an overall
weighted mean of 4.65 which is equivalent to a very satisfactory evaluation. Thus,
the proponent determined that the proposed system is effective and accepted by the
respondents.
Table 3
8.1.8. Based on the results of the t-test, it can be concluded that there is a significant
difference between the existing system and the proposed system assessments of the
respondents. It confirms that the proposed system is way up to better than the
existing system as measured through a set of criteria, this criterion is a
developmental tool which measures functionality, usability, reliability, portability,
and supportability commonly known as FURPS.
8.1.9.
Table 4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The proponent would like to express their deepest gratitude to all of those who
contributed to the completion of this IT Capstone Project. The proponents would like to
thank the following individuals who in one way or another contributed and extended their
valuable assistance in the preparation and completion of the study.
First, the proponent is particularly grateful for the Commission on Higher Education
(CHED) for its Faculty Development Program for selecting me as a recipient of their
scholarship program. I feel very privileged and touched to receive the support in my master's
degree endeavors.
Second, the proponent would like to thank the Brioso and Pascual families who gave
their moral, and financial support.
Moreover, the proponents are deeply indebted to their Capstone Project Adviser,
namely Mr. Joseph G. Gonzales who trained and taught the proponent how to start every
phase of the development of the project, to be responsible, and encourages us to do our most
excellent. Likewise to Ms. Amy Lyn M. Maddalora, the proponent’s mentor who gave the
helping hand in giving the proponent strategies. To Dr. Ace Lagman for sharing his ideas and
principles in the context of the proponent’s project. In addition, the proponent is also thankful
to all the panelists who critiqued the project namely Ms. Josephine T. Casin, as the panel
chair, along with Mr. Roman M. De Angel and Ms. Abigail L. Alix, panel members who
gave constructive criticism and suggestions for the improvement of the proposed IT Capstone
Project.
The proponent is grateful as well to Ms. Rossana T. Adao, Senior Director for
Computer Studies for the courage to finish Masters in Information Technology. Also, to Ms.
Kris Ericka M. Are for coordinating and overseeing the administrative concerns.
This capstone project would have remained a dream had it not been for the benevolent
IT professionals of the College of Computer Studies, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig headed
by Ms. Noreen M. Arcangel, Dean of the College of Computer Studies along with the very
supportive faculty members for accepting the proponent’s IT capstone project proposal as
client and for the cooperation towards this study and for giving the proponent helpful and
important information needed to this study.
J.O.P.B.
REFERENCES
[3] Ballesteros, J., Porciello, M., Balkon, N., & Backus, D. (2007). The Blackboard
Learning System, Journal of Educational Technology Systems.
[4] Bradford, P., Porciello, M., Balkon, N., & Backus, D. (2007). The Blackboard Learning
System, Journal of Educational Technology Systems.
[5] Chaudhary, P., & Sharma, S. (2012). ICT in the 21st-century classroom. International
Journal of Basic and Advanced Research, 1(1), 1-5.
[6] Clark, R., & Harrelson, G. L. (2002). Designing instruction that supports cognitive
learning processes. Journal of Athletic Training, 37(4 Supplement), S152-S159.
[7] Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven
guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons,
USA.
[8] Driscoll, M. (2010). Web-based training: Creating e-learning experiences: John Wiley
& Sons, USA.
[9] Friesen, S., & Lock, J. V. (2010). High performing districts in the application of 21st-
century learning technologies: Review of the research.
[10] Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and
practice (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis, New York.
[11] Glancy, F.H. & Isenberg, S.K. (2011). A Conceptual E – Learning Framework.
(Research, Lindenwood University, St. Charles, Missouri, USA). European,
Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems 2011.
[12] Glass, G. V. & Hopkins, K. D. (1984). Statistical methods in education and psychology,
2nd Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[13] Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, a division of the Educational and Professional Publishing Group
of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New
York 10020.
[14] Hennessy, S., & Onguko, B., (2010). Developing the use of information and
communication technology to enhance teaching and learning in East African schools:
Review of the literature. Retrieved from
http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/centres/cce/publications/CCE_
Report1_LitRevJune0210.pdf
[15] Huan, K.T. & McKay, E. (2011). The Factors Influencing E-learning Adoption by
Academic Staff: A Case Study in Taiwan. In S. Barton et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of
Global Learn 2011 (pp. 585-594). Association for the Advancement of Computing in
Education (AACE).
[16] Jamal, H. & Khodamoradi, S. (2013). The effectiveness of E learning Methods in Plant
Clinics of Tehran. Retrieved June 3, 2015,
from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/263847228_Effectiveness_of_E_Learnin
g_Methods_in_Plant_Clinics_of_Tehran.
[17] Kahiigi, K. E., Vesisenaho, M., Hansson, H., Danielson, M., & Tusubira, F. F. (2012).
Modelling a peer assignment review process for collaborative e-learning. Journal of
Interactive Online Learning, 11(2), 67-79.
[18] Kaur, I. (2017). Deployment of Cloud in Blended Learning Environment to Enhance Academic
Quality: An Indian Perspective. Journal of Review of Integrative Business and Economics
Research Journal, Vol. 6, Issue 3, p. 146-154.
[19] Kendall, K.E. & Kendall J.E. (2011). The Effect of the E-learning Method on the Third
Grade Students Achievement Social and National Education Subject in Jordan And
National Attitude Towards E-learning, 8th Edition Philippines: Prentice Hall (Pearson
Education South Asia Ltd.)
[20] Khawaldeh, M. (2013). System Analysis and Design, Dirasal: Educational Sciences,
Vol. 40 (2013). Retrieved June 3, 2015,
from https://journals.ju.edu.jo/DirasatEdu/article/view/4158.
[21] Li, Y. & Dong, M. (2008). Towards a Knowledge Portal for E-Learning based on
Semantic Web. Knowledge Science & Engineering Institute, School of Education
Technology, Beijing Normal University, China.
[22] Lambropoulos, N., Faulkner, X., & Culwin, F. (2012). Supporting social awareness in
collaborative e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 295-306.
[23] Luchoomun, D., McLuckie, J., & Wesel, M. (2010). Collaborative e-Learning: e-
Portfolios for Assessment, Teaching, and Learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning,
Volume 8.
[24] Makerere University (2010) Makerere University Facts Book Mills, R. J., & Fadel, K.
J. (2012). E-learning as a career path in information systems curricula: A blue ocean
opportunity. American Journal of Business Education, 5(2), 103-114
[25] Mills, R., & Fadel, K. E-learning as a career path in information systems curricula: A
blue ocean opportunity. American Journal of Business Education, 5(2).
[26] Mirjam Augstein (2011). A Dissertation: Activity Sequence Modeling and Multi-
Targeted Clustering for Personalization in E-Learning” (Doctoral Dissertation, Johannes
Kepler University, November 2011).
[27] Monarch Media Inc. Business White Paper (2010). Open-Source Learning Management
Systems: Sakai and Moodle. 406 Mission Street, Suit J Santa Cruz, CA 95060.
[28] Naidu, Som (2006).E-Learning: A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices,
2nd Revised Edition, Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia (CEMCA),
Aisha Creative Workshop Design and Printing.
[29] Narasimhulu, V., Sujatha, P., Dhavachelvan, P., & Partiban, S. (2010). Development of
E-Learning System using Transliteration. International Journal of Engineering Science
and Technology, 2(8), 3886-3893.
[30] Nelson, W., & Richey, R. (2001). Developmental Research. Research Methodologies in
Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from
http://www.aect.org/edtech/ed1/pdf/42.pdf.
[31] Nicolaides, A. (2012). Innovative teaching and learning methodologies for higher
education institutions. Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 620-626.
[32] Noirid, S. & Srisa-ard, B. (2007). E-Learning Models: A Review of Literature. The 1st
International Conference on Education Reform 2007, Mahasarakham University,
Thailand.
[33] Oblinger, D. G., & Hawkins, B. L. (2005). The myth about E-learning. Educause review,
14-15.
[34] Orr, K. (2001). Adaptive Software Development. Cutter Consortium Summit 2001, p.
173.
[35] PinoyTechBlog (2006). “Moodle: Open Source E-Learning in the Philippines”. An
online article published about distance e-learning. Retrieved August 7, 2012, from
http://www.pinoytechblog.com/archives/moodle-open-source-e-learning-in-the-
philippines.
[36] Pressman, Roger S. (2001). Software Engineering: A Practitioners Approach, 4th
Edition, Singapore McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
[37] PMBOK (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK
Guide – 3rd Edition, Project Management Institute Inc., Four Campus Boulevard,
Newton Square, Pennsylvania.
[38] Quimbo, Ma. Ana Ph.D. Teachers’ Perspectives of the Quality of E-Learning
Courseware Integration in the Secondary Curriculum (Doctoral Dissertation, University
of the Philippines – Los Banos). Philippines E-Learning Society.
[39] Radenković, B. L., Despotović-Zrakić, M. S., Barać, D.M.,et al. (2011). Web Portal for
Adaptive E- Learning. TELSIK 2011.
[40] Reeves, T.C. (2000), ‘Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research ‘design
experiments’ and other development research strategies. Symposium on “International
perspectives on Instructional Technology Research for the 21st century (session 41.29:
New Orleans, LA, USA).
[41] Savvides, P. (2011). The effects of the learning management system on student
satisfaction, performance, and course interaction. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra
(Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education
International Conference 2011 (pp. 721-723). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the
Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 3, 2015,
from http://www.editlib.org/p/36361.
[42] Shelly, G.B., Cashman T.J. & Rosenblatt H.J. (2002). Systems Analysis and Design.
Course Technology Publisher.
[43] Tabora, F. G. & Abasquez, J.F. "Comparative Study of e-Learning Approach and
Traditional Approach". Retrieved August 7, 2012, from
http://www.usm.edu.ph/gradschool/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=
185:comparative-study-of-e-learning-approach-and-traditional-
pproach&catid=62:research-journal-december-2004&Itemid=66.
[44] Tella, A. & Bashorun, M.T. Impact of Web Portalson E-Learning. (Research, University
of Llorin, Ilorin, Nigeria).
[45] Torrisi, G. (2010). Collaborative learning strategies in a blended international context.
Journal of eLearning and Knowledge Society, 6(3), 71-81.
[46] Tserendorj, N., Tudevdagva, U., & Heller, A. (2013). Integration of Learning
Management System into University-Level Teaching and Learning. Technische
Universitat Chemnitz, Facultat fur Informatik.
[47] Zulueta, F.M. & Perez, J.R. (2010). Methods of Research, Thesis Writing, and Applied
Statistics. National Book Store, Mandaluyong City.
Internet Sources: