Criminal Procedure Final Ed PDF

MOSHI CO-OPERATIVE UNIVERSITY
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW IN TANZANIA
THEORY AND PRACTICES
BY MWAKISIKI, MWAKISIKI, EDWARD

9/4/2017
This work seek to introduce a criminal procedure law student to various procedures in
adjudicating criminal cases both in High court and subordinate court. This work covers essential
criminal procedures ranging from investigation, search, arrest, institution of proceedings, plea
taking to procedures like Preliminary hearing, bail, Hearing, conviction and sentence just to
mention a few.
Prepared by Tsar MWAKISIKI, MWAKISIKI, EDWARD
TOPIC ONE: INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW
▪ Meaning of Criminal Procedure Law

Criminal procedure law entails a frame work of laws and rules that govern the administration of
justice in cases involving individuals accused of committing crimes. The procedure begins with
the initial investigation of the crime and concluded with either unconditional release of the accused
by the virtual of the acquittal or by imposition of s term of punishment pursuant to conviction for
the crime.
▪ Purposes and importance of Criminal Procedures
The importance of criminal procedure was stated in the case of Joseph Masunzu V R1, where
Justice Katiti held that“….We can’t peaceful make our journey through life without the law telling
us the light direction to follow, and sometimes even the time to follow and when to start our
journey and through which route….”
The fundamental purpose of criminal procedure was also stated in the case of Kamundi V R2,
where it was held that the all purpose and intention of criminal procedure is to laid down provisions
and procedures to see that justice is done.
▪ Differences between Civil Procedure and Criminal Procedure
• The burden of proof in criminal procedure is that beyond reasonable doubt, while, the
burden of proof in civil cases is on balance of probabilities.
• A person is said to be prosecuted in criminal cases, while, In Civil cases a person is said to
be sued.
• Criminal cases are instituted by lodging a charge sheet of information before the court of
law as per section 132 of CPA, while, civil cases are instituted by presentation of plaint as
per order 4 rule 1 & section 22 of CPC.
• Criminal procedure entails the frame work of laws that govern the administration of justice
in cases involving an individual who has been accused of a crime, while, Criminal
procedure on the other hand entails the frame work of laws that govern the administration
of justice in cases involving an individual who has been accused of a crime.
1
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 1991.
2
[1957] EA 540.
2
Compiled Notes on Criminal Procedure and Practice-Moshi Co-operative University-LLB (2016-17)
• Civil procedure is the written set of rules that sets out the process that the court will follow
when hearing cases of civil nature, while, criminal procedure is the written set of rules that
sets out the process that the court will follow when hearing cases of civil nature.
• In civil matters the controversy is between individuals and it is put to one of them to bring
an action against the other, while, criminal procedure is different from civil procedure
because the burdens and results are dramatically different. In criminal matters action is
taken by the state against an individual or organization for violation of law. In case an
accused person has been convicted of crime he can put-on probation or ordered to pay fine
or confined to serve term in jail.
• Criminal Procedures rules on the other hand are designed to give both parties a set of equal
rules to go by, while, the rules of criminal procedure are different from civil procedure
because the results and objectives of the litigation differ. Criminal procedure rules are
generally designed to protect right of the suspect and the accused person.
▪ Differences between Criminal law and Criminal Procedure
Criminal Law Criminal Criminal Procedure
1. Substantive Law 1. Remedial/Procedural Law
2. It declares what acts are punishable 2. It provides how the act is to be punished
3. It defines crimes, treats of their nature 3. It provides for the method by which a
and provides for their punishment person accused of a crime is arrested,
tried or punished.
3
▪ Sources of criminal procedure

➢ Constitution
How Constitution is the source of criminal procedure?
• Constitution is the fundamental law of any country, Constitution is said to be the source
of criminal procedure because principally the validity of any written law is determined
against what is contained in the constitution. No law is valid if it is contravenes any of
the provisions of constitution in terms of sprit or procedure or otherwise.
• Article 13 of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977 provides for
the right to fair hearing. Therefore if there is any law of criminal procedure that is
against what is contain in article 13 then that law would be illegal.
• The constitution contain also the fundamental rules of criminal justice, one of them is
the presumption of innocence that is the person is presumed to be innocent unless
otherwise is proved beyond reasonable doubt as provided under article 13(6) (b) of the
Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. Therefore no law of criminal
procedure is valid if it creates the presumption of guilty before the same been proved.
• Again no person is to be punished for an offence which does not exist as per article
13(6) (c) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania. Therefore they can
never be a criminal procedure which allows a punishment of a person for a non-
existence offence as that rule would be illegal.
➢ Statute
Piece of legislations made by the parliament or any other bodies authorized to do so form a basic
source of criminal procedure in Tanzania. For example the Criminal procedure Act is a basic
source of criminal procedures, For example section 4(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides
that all offences under the Penal Code shall be inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with
according to the provisions of this Act. Section 4(2) provides that all offences under any other law
shall be inquired into, tried and otherwise dealt with according to the provisions of this Act, except
where that other law provides differently for the regulation of the manner or place of investigation
into, trial or dealing in any other way with those offences. What can be observed from section 4 is
that once an offence is committed under the Penal Code procedures to be followed are those
contained in the Criminal Procedure Act.
4
➢ International law
International law entails a total of norms accepted by the international community to regulate
relation between state and also between states and their subjects. The international laws are
applicable in Tanzania subject to the provision of Article 63(3) (e) of the Constitution.
International law is also one of the sources of criminal procedure especially in the areas of human
right promotion and protection. There a number of international convections which have a direct
bearing to the administration of criminal Justice, One of the convection of this nature is the
convention of the right of the child of 1990. This convention protects the child under the age of 18
years against capital punishments or life imprisonment and calls of a separate detention facilities
from adults.
➢ Precedents
It is another important source of law in Tanzania. These are cases arising from the decision of the
High Court and Court of Appeal. They are either reported cases or unreported. Therefore they form
the basic precedents of Tanzanian laws and bind lower courts thereto. Reported cases in Tanzania
can be found in a number of Law Reports. Between 1957and 1977 cases reported from the High
Court of Tanzania and the East African Court of Appeal appeared in East Africa Law
Reports. Precedents or case laws are substantially the basic source of criminal procedure, for
example the case of Mwango s/o Manana vs R 3 , lay down important criminal procedures
regarding conducting identification parade.
▪ The current criminal procedures in Tanzania
❖ Investigation4
Investigation is most important step after a report or of any criminal offence, because it’s the only
thing that will help the prosecution to have the basis for their case in court through accumulation
of evidence. Apprehension can be done at the scene of crime; if not detection work of various
kinds may occur until the police have a suspect.
❖ Arrest5
Police Officer has powers to arrest with or without warrant depending on the certain circumstances
as provided for under S. 14 of the Criminal Procedure Act, which includes when commission of
3[1936]3 EACA, pg.29.

4Section 10 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
5
Section 14 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
5
offence is done at his presence. Arrest can be done by private person without warrant when
involving injury to property by the owner of the property or his servants or a person authorized by
the owner of the property and other circumstances provided by s.14 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Arrest can be done by magistrate as well, when the commission of offence is within the local limits
of his jurisdiction s.17 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
❖ Search6
Search must be carried in accordance with the law and laid procedures, because it interfere ones
privacy, liberty and freedom. Hence you must seek search warrant from appropriate authority. Two
types of search; first is warranty from in charge of a police station s.38 Criminal Procedure Act.
This may be issued to any person including police officers. The second one is search warrants by
the court.
❖ Charge Sheet (Charge) 7
Charge is a foundation of institution of criminal proceedings against an accused. This is a
document that states the offences and provisions of the laws that the accused has breached,
together with his personal information. Prosecution will draw charge if the case is triable by
subordinate courts or information if the offences are triable only by High Court. There are certain
offences triable by High Court only such as incest, murder, arson and treason.
❖ Plea Taking8
Here the accused will be required to plead for the charges read to him .The accused will be asked
by the court to give a plea of guilty or not guilty. If the accused plead guilty the plea must be
unequivocal , which means clear plea if the plea is not clear court enters a plea of not guilty. If
plea of not guilty is entered by the court the prosecution will be allowed to proceed to present
their case. If postponed the accused will have a chance to ask for bail, if is bailable offence. If the
plea of guilty is entered then the procedure will skip to Acquit/Convict till the end.
❖ Bail9
Most of time if accused plead guilty and plea is entered bail do not apply. After plea a person is
remanded or bailed. Bail is constitutional right s.13 (6) (b) of United Republic of Tanzania
Constitution, [Cap 2, R.E 2002], presumption of innocence. There are unbailable offences like
6
7
8 Section 275 and 228 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
9 Section 148 and 63 Section of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
6
Treason, armed robbery, defilement and murder under s.148 (5) of Criminal Procedure Act. Police
bail can be granted before matter set to court; court bail is when the matter is set in court.
❖ Preliminary Hearing (PH) 10
This is an important stage where the parties meet to draft a memorandum of agreed fact so as to
expedite the case speed .The parties have to meet decide on what matters are not in dispute and
those matters are not supposed to be brought during trials neither party is required to prove any of
those facts except the facts in dispute only.
❖ Trial Stage
This is when the case is set for hearing or mention and the prosecution have to prove whether they
have case against the accused or not before the court.
❖ Prosecution Case11
This is a stage where the prosecution have to present their case ,where the prosecution will call
upon the witnesses to give their testimonies and present any other evidence that support their case,
for court to decide whether there is a case to answer or not. It is in this stage where the witness
will be examined by prosecution at first (Examination in Chief), then will be examined by defense
(Cross examination) lastly will be reexamined by prosecution (re-examination). Importantly:
Generally the burden of proof lies on Prosecution and the standard of proof is beyond reasonable
doubt.
❖ Case to Answer /No Case to answer12
This is a stage where the court has to decide on whether there is a case to answer or not, basing on
the evidence provided by prosecution. If no case to answer the court will acquit the accused, if
there is a case to answer accused will be having chance to present evidence in his support.
❖ Defense Case13
Basically here the defense team will present their evidence, witness be examined in chief, cross
examined by prosecution and re-examined by the defense.
❖ Final Submission: This is a summary of the whole presentation from each side; defense
will be the first to make their final submission then followed by the prosecution side. Final
submission can be orally or in writing, this have to be with the leave of the court.
10
12Section 230 and 231 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
7
❖ Acquit or Convict
This is a stage where by the court will rule depending on the submission by prosecution and
defense if the accused is found guilty or not. Therefore the accused can be found not guilty,
if found not guilty, game over, he will be acquitted and set free, If found guilty the next step will
follow.
❖ Mitigating and Aggravating factors
When the accused is convicted, Defense will be given chance to present factors that tend to
diminish the magnitude of sentence whereas prosecution will be give factors that tend to increase
the magnitude of the sentence.
❖ Sentence14 and Judgment15
This will be second last thing, the court will read the sentence in the judgment and there is a set
rule in the law that it shall be within ninety days under s.311 of the Criminal Procedure Act. The
contents of the judgment are provided by the law under s.312 of CPA.
❖ Right to Appeal Explained
The judge /magistrate must pronounce the right to appeal for any aggrieved party with the decision.
Note: The sixty days rule established under section 225 of CPA require criminal prosecution to be
finalized within 60 days from the day of their commencement subject to certain exceptions like in
serious offences whose investigation is likely to protracted such as treason.
❖ The above identified criminal stages will be well elaborated in the next topics.
TOPIC TWO: COURTS JURISDICTION IN CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE
➢ INTRODUCTION
In criminal matters, it is essential for a legal counsel: whether an advocate or prosecution attorney
to have knowledge of jurisdiction of courts. Indeed the question of jurisdiction lies at the root of
judicial functions. Courts are creatures of statute and can only exercise such powers as conferred
by statute. They may not exercise powers which the law does not, expressly or impliedly, vest in
them.

8
Jurisdiction is fundamental; it is not simply a question of form for it prescribes the boundaries of
the authority of a court. If a court tries a case over which it has no jurisdiction the sentence passed
and handed to the accused after such trial cannot stand. For instance it would be illegal for a
Primary court to try and convict an accused person charged with murder.
➢ Meaning of jurisdiction
Simply defined the jurisdiction of a court refers to the extent to which or the limits within which,
courts or magistrates or judges may act in the course of handling a particular type of a case or pass
a particular sentence.
The limits within which a court may exercise its powers may be geographical or pecuniary or may
be prescribed according to the subject matter; that is by categorization of offences which should
be tried or inquired into by a certain court or the sentence which such court may impose.
➢ Categories of Jurisdiction
➢ Original Jurisdiction
Original jurisdiction means the power of a court to hear or try a case as a matter of first instance.
This requires that a particular type of case should only be commenced and tried in the lowest
court in the ladder before moving to the next court in that hierarchy if need be. A court with original
jurisdiction may hear the case; make various findings and orders, pass judgment and sentence the
accused within the limits provided for in the law. According to sections 18, 40 and 41 of the
Magistrates Courts’ Act, Primary Courts, District Courts and Resident Magistrates’ Courts in
Tanzania mainland have original jurisdiction in criminal matters as provided by the First Schedule
(jurisdiction of primary courts) and Second Schedule (jurisdiction of district courts) of the Act and
any other law. The High Court of Tanzania has unlimited original jurisdiction.
Further guidance regarding original jurisdiction of courts is to be found in other laws. The First
Schedule to the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap. 20, for instance, sets out the offences in connection
with which the High Court and district courts may exercise original jurisdiction. Similarly original
jurisdiction in relation to economic crimes lays with the High Court, in accordance with section 3
of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Chapter. 200.
9
➢ Territorial Jurisdiction
Territorial jurisdiction means the geographical area within which a court may exercise its powers.
A District Court has jurisdiction within the district in which it is situated, and a court of a resident
magistrate has jurisdiction in the region within which it is situated (See Sections 4–5 Magistrates’
Courts Act, Cap. 11). On the other hand the High Court has jurisdiction within the territorial limits
of a State (See Article 108 Constitution of the United Republic 1977). Territorial jurisdiction of
the primary court is provided under section 3 of Cap. 11.
The case of Sharma v. R 16, sufficiently illustrates the point as to the importance of territorial
jurisdiction. In that case territorial jurisdiction was in issue. The Court of appeal for Eastern Africa
pointed out that proof of place of commission of offence is essential to the prosecution’s case and
that although it is not always capable of exact proof, evidence should be led on which the necessary
inference can be drawn.
➢ Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction by subject matter, also termed jurisdiction by categorization of offences is expressly

conferred by legislation stating which offences are triable by what court. The First Schedule to the
Criminal Procedure Act, for instance, sets out what offences are triable by subordinate courts and
which are triable by the High Court. Similarly the First Schedule to the Magistrates’ Courts Act,
Cap. 11 set out which offences may be tried by primary courts in addition to other subordinate
courts.
The case of R v. Mrisho s/o Seffu17, sufficiently illustrates the issue of subject matter jurisdiction.
In that case the accused was tried and convicted by a district court of the offence of incest by males
contrary to section 158 (1) of the Penal Code. The High Court in revision declared the trial a nullity
as the offence is triable only by the High Court. Consequently the conviction was quashed, the
sentence set aside, and the case was remitted to the subordinate court for committal proceedings
at the option of the Republic.
1620 EACA 310

17[1968] HCD 140
10
➢ Pecuniary Jurisdiction
Pecuniary jurisdiction, which usually applies to civil cases, means limitation of the powers of a
court by the value of the subject matter in issue. For the purpose of this paper it is only of passing
interest and need not detain us any further (See the provisions of Written laws miscellaneous
Amendments Act no. 3 of 2016).
➢ Sentencing Jurisdiction
Section 170 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, prescribes what sentences subordinate courts may
lawfully pass. That sub-section provides that in cases where such sentences are authorized by law,
a subordinate court may pass a sentence of imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years, as a
general rule. Similarly it may not impose a fine of more than twenty million shillings.
For instance, where a subordinate court convicts a person of the offence of stealing from the person
of another (s. 269 Penal Code), an offence which carries a maximum sentence of ten years
imprisonment, the maximum sentence it can impose on the convicted person is five years
imprisonment, regardless of what the aggravating circumstances may be.
If however, a subordinate court convicts a person of an offence scheduled under the Minimum
Sentences Act, Cap. 90, and such sentence is authorized by law, it may pass a sentence of
imprisonment for such offence for a term not exceeding eight years.
➢ Appellate Jurisdiction
Appellate jurisdiction means the power of a court to hear or try matters on appeal from another
court inferior to it. For instance section 20 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act gives district courts the
power to hear appeals from decisions of primary courts, while section 21 stipulates what district
courts may do in exercise of their appellate jurisdiction. Further, in terms of section 25 of the same
Act; parties aggrieved by decisions of district courts in the exercise of their appellate jurisdiction
may further appeal to the High Court. Finally, in accordance with section 4 of the Appellate
Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141, the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from
the High Court and from subordinate courts with extended jurisdiction.
11
As such in criminal matters a person convicted on a trial held by the High Court or by a subordinate
court exercising extended powers may appeal to the Court of Appeal. Similarly if the Director of
Public Prosecutions is dissatisfied with any acquittal, sentence or order made or passed by the High
Court or by a subordinate court exercising extended powers he may appeal to the Court of Appeal
against the acquittal, sentence or order, as the case may be.
➢ Extended Jurisdiction
When a subordinate court is given power to try offences not ordinarily tried by subordinate courts,
it is said to exercise extended jurisdiction. Indeed it ought to be borne in mind that extended
jurisdiction is not for the courts but for the Magistrates. In terms of section 173 of the Criminal
Procedure Act, the Minister responsible for legal affairs may, after consultation with the Chief
Justice and the Attorney General, by order published in the Gazette invest any resident magistrate
with power to try any category of offences, or specified cases which, would ordinarily be tried by
the High Court, specifying the area within which he may exercise such extended powers. Similarly
by virtue of section 45 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act, a magistrate may be vested by the Minister
with appellate jurisdiction ordinarily exercisable by the High Court.
A magistrate exercising extended jurisdiction has the power to impose any sentence which could
lawfully be imposed by the High Court. Therefore, for the purposes of any appeal from or revision
of his decision in the exercise of extended jurisdiction, such resident magistrate is deemed to be a
judge of the High Court, and the court presided over by him while exercising extended jurisdiction
shall be deemed to be the High Court.
➢ Revisional Jurisdiction
Revision jurisdiction is the power vested in a superior court to examine the records of an
inferior court in order to satisfy itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any decisions
or orders made by such (inferior) court. Thus, in terms of section 22 of the Criminal Procedure
Act a district court may call for and examine the records of proceedings in primary courts and
revise them.
Similarly a Resident Magistrate-in Charge may call for and inspect the record of any
proceedings in a district court and the High Court has revision jurisdiction over matters
12
originating in primary courts, as persons aggrieved by a decision of a district court in the

exercise of its revision powers over primary courts may appeal to the High Court.
Similarly section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Act empowers the High Court to call for
records of a subordinate (magistrate’s) court for the purpose of examining such record and
satisfying itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order
recorded or passed by that court. The revision jurisdiction of the primary court is provided
under section 21 of Ward Tribunal Act Cap 206.
➢ Summary Jurisdiction
Criminal trials before subordinate courts involving offences which fall within the ambit of
jurisdiction of subordinate courts are normally disposed of by way of summary trial. This
happens because the subordinate court is vested with the power to try such offences and impose
the appropriate sentence. Criminal offences triable by subordinate courts are also technically
known as summary offences. As such they may be said to be disposed of in by way of summary
trial18, and the subordinate court involved in disposing of the cases may rightly be said to
exercise summary jurisdiction. The First Schedule to the Criminal Procedure Act contains a
list of some of the offences which subordinate courts may dispose of by way of summary trial.
Where offences not triable by a subordinate court are involved, it has to hold committal
proceedings 19. The terms summary trial and summary jurisdiction have, by some authorities
on Criminal Procedure, been associated with (and sometimes restricted to) the provisions of
section 213(1) of the CPA which lay down the procedure that may be followed by subordinate
courts in the case of minor offences detailed in sub-section two of that section, which may be
tried without recording the evidence.
➢ Supervisory Jurisdiction
The High Court exercises general powers of supervision over all courts in the exercise of their
jurisdiction and therefore has power to: • call for and inspect the record of any proceedings in a
18
Section 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act defines summary trial to mean ‘a trial held by a subordinate court under
Part VII of the Act’. This part of the Criminal Procedure Act details the procedure to be followed in trials before
subordinate courts.
19
Section 244 of the Criminal Procedure Act explains the circumstances under which committal proceedings are to
held.
13
district court or primary court and examine the records or register thereof; or • direct any district
court to call for and inspect the records of any proceedings of the primary court established in its
district and to examine its records and registers thereof, in order to satisfy itself, as to the
correctness, legality and propriety of any decision or order and as to the regularity of any
proceedings therein; (see s.30 (1) Magistrates’ Courts Act).
Similarly a resident Magistrate-in-Charge may call for and inspect the record of any proceedings
in a resident magistrates' court, a district court or a primary court and examine the records or
registers thereof for the purpose of satisfying himself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of
any decision or order and as to the regularity of any proceedings therein: (See section 30(2) of the
Magistrates’ Courts Act.).
TOPIC THREE: INVESTIGATIONS

Investigation can be defined as a way to look into carefully in order to uncover facts or gain
information make through examination of the facts about the situation of crime 20.
In the legal situation it is very solely and sometime practical impossible to conduct the criminal
trial and complete it for a just one day sitting of the court, thus investigation should take place so
as to prove or disapprove allegations subject to the provision 10 of the Criminal Procedure Act as
states hereunder; “If from the information received or in any other way a police has reason to
suspect the commission of an offence or to apprehend a breach of the peace he shall, where
necessary, proceed in person to the place to investigate the facts and circumstances of the case
and to take such measures as may be necessary for the discovery and arrest of the offender where
the offence is one for which he may arrest without warrant.”
Powers of prosecution the decision to prosecute or not to prosecute a suspect is inevitable. Usually
this decision is made by a senior police officer in charge of criminal investigation at the police
station and it depends on the amount of evidence obtained from the victim of the crime, the scene
of crime, the accuser’s recorded statement and interviews of witnesses.
20
Macmillan. School Dictionary, William.D.Halsey Edit Director. (supra)
14
▪ Purpose of Investigation
The purpose behind the law on investigation here is to protect the interest of both parties to case
as well as to maintain justice requirement. But the problem is that the law on investigation itself is
silent to the good cause of making it. Thus gives room to those people who invested power to make
it to misuse their power and the consequences of this is to the delay of justice, this delay directly
affect the right of the accused person because as justice delayed is a justice denied. In R.v. Mwita
Nyangitimo21, The accused person in this case was charged with stealing a sub-machine gun.
Following the failure of the police to accomplish the investigation due to the loss of the police case
file, the case took almost six years up to the finality. Eventually the accused person was found not
guilty of an offence despite the six years’ experience of torture in prison.
• Powers and Duties of Police Officers when Investigating Offences are stipulated under
section 46 of CPA.
TOPIC FOUR: ARREST
▪ Meaning of Arrest
Simply put, arrest can be described as the process of stopping, seizing, or apprehending a person
by lawful authority; or the act of laying hands upon a person for the purpose of taking his body
into custody of the law ; the restraining of the liberty of a man's person in order to compel
obedience to the order of a court of justice, or to prevent the commission of a crime, or to insure
that a person charged or suspected of a crime may be forthcoming to answer it22.
▪ How arrest is made?
The provision of section 11(1) of CPA enumerate on how arrest is made, and with respect to this
section, arrest is deemed to be made when a police officer or any other person effecting an arrest
actually touch or confine the body of a person to be arrested. Further the provision of section 11(2)
of the CPA, empowers a person effecting an arrest to use all necessary means to effect arrest in
the event where a person to be arrested forcibly resists to be arrested.
21
[1980] TLR, No 317
22
Black's Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed
15
However an arrested person should not be subjected to more restraint than necessary to prevent
his escape as per section 12 of the CPA.
▪ Who may effect arrest?
According to the provision of the CPA, three class of person may effect arrest that is a police
officer, a magistrate or a private person.
• Arrest by private persons, the provision of section 16 (1) & (2) of CPA, gives power to
a private person to arrest any person who in his presence commits any of the offences
referred to in section 14 of CPA. Further the sub-section 2 empowers the owner of the
property to arrest without a warrant any person found committing an offence involving
injury to property.
• Arrest by magistrate, the provisions of section 17 and 18 of CPA empowers a magistrate
to arrest any person whom he reasonably believes has committed an offence within the
local limits of his jurisdiction, and this can be done by issue of warrant directing such arrest.
• Arrest by police officer, as per section 14 which empowers a police officer to arrest any
person without warrant for offences and circumstances provided therein.
▪ What to do and not to do during arrest?
• It’s imperative that a person who is arrested to be informed of the substance of offence for
which he is arrested, however subject to certain exception a person cannot be informed
with the substance of the offence if (a) if, by reason of the circumstances in which he is
arrested, that person ought to know the substance of the offence for which he is arrested;
or (b) if by reason of his actions the person arrested makes it impracticable for the person
effecting the arrest to inform him of wthe offence for which he is arrested, (See Section
23(1), (2), & (3)).
▪ Section 21 (1) of the CPA is to the effect that, a police officer or other person shall not, in
the course of arresting a person, use more force or subject the person to greater indignity
than is necessary to make the arrest or to prevent the escape of the person after he has been
arrested.
16
▪ An arrest warrant
Is an official document, signed by a judge (or magistrate), which authorizes a police officer
to arrest the person or people named in the warrant. Warrants typically identify the crime for which
an arrest has been authorized, and may restrict the manner in which an arrest may be made.
▪ Form, contents and duration of warrant of arrest.
In the law of Tanzania a warrant of arrest shall be under the hand of the judge or the magistrate
issuing the same and shall bear the seal of the court, and every warrant shall remain in force until
it is executed or until it is cancelled by the court which issued it. Generally the form, contents and
duration of warrant of arrest is provided under section 112(1), (2) & (3) of CPA.
➢ Subject to the provision of section 119 of CPA, a warrant of arrest may be executed at any
place within the United Republic of Tanzania.
▪ Who may issue an arrest warrant?
The provisions of section 13 of CPA is to the effect that a warrant for arrest is sought and given
by either magistrate, ward secretary or secretary of the village after receiving information under
oath that a person has committed an offence, (See Section 13(1), (2), (3), (4) & (5) of the CPA).
▪ Arrest by Police officer
Arrest can be made with or without warrants by police officers. The categories of persons who
can be arrested without warrant are enumerated in the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA).
The provision of section 14 of CPA empowers a police officer arrest any person without warrant,
where:-
• Any person who commits a breach of the peace in his presence;

• Any person who willfully obstructs a police officer while in the execution of his duty, or
who has escaped or attempts to escape from lawful custody;
• Any person in whose possession anything is found which may reasonably be suspected to
be stolen property or who may reasonably be suspected of having committed an offence
with reference to such thing;
17
• Any person whom he finds lying or loitering in any highway, yard or garden or other place
during the night and whom he suspects upon reasonable grounds of having committed or
being about to commit an offence or who has in his possession without lawful excuse any
offensive weapon or housebreaking implement;
• Any person for whom he has reasonable cause to believe a warrant of arrest has been
issued;
• Any person whom he suspects upon reasonable grounds of having been concerned in any
act committed at any place out of Tanzania which, if committed in Tanzania, would have
been punishable as an offence, and for which he is, under the Extradition Act, or otherwise,
liable to be apprehended and detained in Tanzania;
• Any person who does any act which is calculated to insult the national emblem or the
national flag;
• Any person whom he suspects of being a loiterer.
It should be noted that CPA does not make room for arrests out of the whim or caprice of the
arresting police officer. For police officer to be able to arrest without warrants the offence for
which any person is arrested must be a cognizable offence is, generally speaking an offence
punishable with two years imprisonment or more.
The right to break into or out of a house allowed by the CPA if necessary23, it is illegal for any
police officer to arrest detains the wife or child of a suspect as a means for compelling his or her
appearance.
Any police officer or person making an arrest is bound, without unnecessary delay, to commit the
suspect to the nearest police station for further legal processes appropriate 24.
The CPA empowers the police to put any arrested person under restraint for purpose consistent
with the investigation of any offence he is alleged to have committed. Restraint may necessitate
keeping the person in custody overnight for twenty-four hours; in the case of an arrest able
offence25. The period for interviewing a person under restraint is statutorily regulated. It normally
23
24
Ibid
25
18
four hours, unless extended to eight hours or such hours as magistrate may determine on
application by the interviewing officer 26.
The police are required to commit an arrested person before a magistrate without twenty four hours
or as soon as it is practicable, in the case of persons arrested some distance from the local
jurisdiction of the nearest court.
TOPIC FIVE: SEARCH AND SEIZURE
The CPA provides for the power of search and seizure in section 23. A person arrested should be
searched immediately following arrest. This is necessary to check if anything may be discovered
which may be used in evidence and also to identify the suspect, his personal effects, hidden
weapons and so forth.
In the case of female suspects, it is mandatory that other women do the search. This should be
done with strict regard to decency and should not be done in the presence of men as per section 26
of the Act. The power of search and seizure extends to the search of premises, vehicles, ships or
vessels aircraft as per section 25 of the law.
A search can be done on any day including Sunday. Normally it must be at any time between
sunrise and sunset but the court may authorize a person making a search to do at any hour, the
same extends to the execution of search warranties as per section 40(1) of the CPA.
Section 41 of the CPA is to the effect that, a police officer may search the person or the clothing
that is being worn by or property in the immediate control of, a person and may seize any thing
relating to an offence that is found in the course of the search. When the article being searched for
is seized and brought before the court, it may detain until the conclusion of the case as per section
44(1) of the Law.
The CPA empowers the police, when conducting a criminal investigation to search any building
or vessel, carriage, box, receptacle or place in order to recover any thing connected with the
commission of an offence as per section 38 (1) of the law.
26
Section 50(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
19
Also a police officer may search under emergences in circumstances enumerated under section
42(1) (a)-(d) of the CPA, for example a police officer may search under emergences where the
police officer believes on reasonable grounds that it is necessary to do so in order to prevent the
loss or destruction of anything connected with an offence.
TOPIC SIX: CHARGE SHEET/COMPLAINT/CHARGE
Generally there are two ways in which criminal proceedings are instituted in subordinate
Court that is:-
• By laying a complainant27 in a court in terms of section 128(1) of the Criminal Procedure
Act.
• By bringing the accused person before magistrates in terms as per section 128(1) of the
Criminal Procedure Act.
❖ FORMULATION OF CHARGE SHEET OR COMPLAINTS
Although a magistrate has a duty to see the charge is correct, the responsibility of correctness of a
charge is that of a public prosecutor. It is therefore, a public prosecutor’s duty to satisfy himself
that the charge he is about to file is correct and that the court in which it is to be filed has
jurisdiction to try the offence or inquire into it.
❖ What is a charge sheet?
A charge sheet is a formal statement of an offence as preliminary step to prosecution. A Charge is
a written accusation against accused person of an offence or allegation of an offence which he is
said to have committed. It is a complaint formal drawn up or formal written accusation of an
offence is drawn up by the magistrate or police officer signed by as required by the law for the use
in criminal trial or in preliminary proceedings (committal proceedings).
A charge sheet is equivalent of pleadings in civil cases. It contains allegations against the other
party. That means the accused party. It specifies and furnishes necessary details in summary form.
In Tanzania, normally a charge sheet is prepared in our police stations or State Attorney Chambers
to commence criminal proceedings against the accused persons.
27
Section 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act defines "complaint" to means an allegation that some person known or
unknown has committed an offence.
20
❖ The purpose of a charge sheet

The purpose of a charge sheet the purpose of a charge is to inform the accused and the court, with
sufficient clarity, the allegations against the accused person.
• To avoid taking the accused by surprise. And hence help him to prepare for defense.
• It helps the court to issue necessary process, for example issuing summons.
• The charge also helps the court to control the proceedings and confine evidence and
arguments only to what is in dispute. Respect for the rule of law that, any
government respect the rule of law should not take people straight to prison without
any charge.
• It the principle of law that no person should be convicted of an offence unless the
offence is defined in a written law. In the case of Musa Mwaikunde v. R28, The
court held that: It is always required that an accused person must know the nature
of the case facing him. And this can be achieved, if the charge discloses the essential
elements to be alleged. As rule, charges must be reduced into writing.
• It enables the court to know whether or not it has jurisdiction to inquire into or to
try the case.
• It enables the court to control proceedings by confining the evidence and arguments
to what is alleged in the charge and what is distributed.
❖ ESSENTIAL PARTS OF A WELL DRAFTED CHARGE SHEET
Formulation of charges is an important part of public prosecutor’s duties; and no public prosecutor
should be forgiven for his ignorance in formulating charges. A charge has three parts:-
• Particulars of the accused person, this part contain the following things Name of the
accused person. Age of the accused person. Nationality or tribe of the accused person.
Occupation or Address of the accused person.
• The offence alleged to have been committed and citation of section of the law or rule
Or order alleged to have been contravened.
• Particulars of the alleged offence, Particulars here means a brief but clear statement of
the acts or omissions alleged has been done or omitted to be done by an accused person.
The particulars should contain: Date Time Place the alleged offence was committed the act
28
[2006] TLR 387
21
or omission complained of, the name of the victim, if any the property involved, if
applicable, and its value, etc. as per section 132 of the CPA.
NOTE: - This explanation on how to draw a charge has been explained under section 132of the
CPA. Also for the case of drawing a charge under Primary Court the mandatory conditions has
been provided under section 21(b) of the MCA (Third Schedule).
• As provided under section 21(2) of the MCA (Third Schedule) is that every charge shall
be brought in the name of the Republic acting on the complaint of the complainant who
shall also be named.
❖ SPECIMEN OF A CHARGE SHEET
CHARGE SHEET
(Name of the court)
i. Name of the accused: Enock s/o Mwakisiki
ii. Age : 24 years
iii. Tribe or Nationality: Nyakyusa, Tanzanian
iv. Religion : Christian
v. Address: House No. 100, Manyoni, Singida.
vi. Offence, Section and law: Robbery contrary to sections 285 and 286 of the Penal Code
vii. Particulars of offence: Enock s/o Mwakisiki on or about 9th April, 2017 at about 5 p.m. at
Samaria, within the district of Manyoni, Singida Region, did steal a laptop valued at
500,000 shillings, the property of Kamugisha, Idd, and at, or immediately before or after
such stealing did use personal violence to the said Kamugisha, Idd, in order to steal or
retain the said property.
viii. Sgd, Juma Esau. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Central Police Station MANYONI Date: 9th
April, 2017
❖ JOINDER OF ACCUSED PERSON
This is the practice of joining more than one accused persons in one charge and try them together.
The circumstances where accused person may be tried jointly are contained under section 134(1)
of the CPA, where the accused person may be charged jointly where:-
Persons accused of the same offence committed in the course of the same transaction Persons
accused of an offence and persons accused of abetting or an attempt to commit such an offence.
Persons accused of different offences committed in the course of the same transaction. Persons
22
accused of any offence under Chapter XXV to XXXI of the Penal Code Persons accused of any
offence relating to counterfeit coin under Chapter XXXVI of the Penal Code Persons accused
of any economic offence under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act.
❖ JOINDER OF COUNTS
Any offences may be charged together in the same charge or information if the offences charged
are founded on the same facts or if they form or are a part of, a series of offences of the same or a
similar character as per section 133(1) of the CPA. Also it is provided under section 21(3) of the
MCA (Third Schedule) which provides as follows: “A charge may contain more than one offence
if the offences charged are founded on the same facts or form part of a series of offences of the
same or similar character but where more than one offence is contained in the same charge it shall
be separately stated…”
❖ DEFECTS OF CHARGES
▪ DUPLICITY
Duplicity of a charge simply means that the charge is double. A charge is said to be duplex where
it contains two distinct offences in a single count.
A simple example will clarify the point. It is alleged that Juma Bushiri broke into the house of
Anna Simon at night and store a radio there from. Your public prosecutor then brings before you
a charge sheet which reads as follows.
IN THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
CHARGE SHEET
Name of the accused person: Juma Bushiri
Age: 30 years
Tribe/Nationality: Chagga/ Tanzanian
Religion: Moslem
Address: House No. 234, Majengo, Shinyanga Township
Offence, Section and Law: Burglary and stealing c/s 294(1) and 265 of the Penal Code [CAP 16
R.E [2002].
Particulars of the Offence: Juma s/o Bushiri On the night of 22nd March 2012 at about 3.00 a.m
at Butwa Village in the District and Region of Tabora did break into the house of Anna d/o Simon
and stole there from a radio valued at shs 1000000/= , the property of the said Anna d/o Simon.
23
It will be noted from both the citation of the offence and the particulars of the charge, that in that
single count the charge is alleging the commission of two distinct offences namely burglary and
stealing.
Such a charge is said to be bad for duplicity. Should you convict on such a charge, the conviction
may well be quashed on appeal if the appellate court should take the view that the duplicity
occasioned a failure of justice.
▪ VARIANCE BETWEEN CHARGE AND EVIDENCE
Variance renders the charge defective unless it is amended and the amendment causes no injustice
to the accused and as so long as the accused person had notice of amended charge from the face
of the original charge. This has been covered also under section 234 of the CPA.
▪ CHARGE ON A REPEALED SECTION
A charge on repealed section or law is curable provided that, the offence is in every essential the
same under the old and the now section or law, no failure of justice may result from the alteration
and the charge and the particulars are clear.
The above conditions is verified through the case of Magesa s/o Mjunja v R29, where the court
held that a charge and conviction under a repealed law is an irregularity which is curable if the
repealed section is re-enacted in identical words in the current statute such that it cannot be said
that the accused has in any way been prejudiced by the irregularity...”.
However if the old and new section or law differ and do not repeat in a similar terms the language
of the old section/law the defects can’t be cured. This has been explained also in the case of Peter
Zakaria v R30, In this case the appellant insulted and threatened a court broker with bloodshed if
his car was attached. He was convicted of unlawfully obstructing a court officer c/s 119, Penal
Code. The section had previously been repealed and replaced by s. 114A. But the court held that
on the facts of the case at hand, it is clear that the new section, s.114A, is broader than the old
section, s. 119, and does not repeat in similar terms the language of the old section. Moreover it is
unclear from the particulars which part of the new section the offence would fall under. Therefore,
in the circumstances, the charge cannot be cured, and the conviction null.
29
[1986] TLR 10
30
[1969] HCD NO. 236.
24
▪ MISQUOTATION OF SECTION NUMBERS

Failure to quote a proper section number isn’t fatal unless it is shown specifically that there was a
miscarriage of justice that is the accused was prejudiced. This has been explained in the case of
Nyabilimo Andrea V R31, In this case the accused was charged and convicted of “robbery with
violence c/s 286 of the Penal Code.” The charge correctly quoted the section of the Code
appropriate to this offence, but gave wrong section number. The court was held that “The number
of the section was obviously quoted in error and I invoke the provisions of Crim. Proc. Code s.
346 ….. As this error cannot occasion any miscarriage of justice or prejudice to the appellant as
the particulars of the offence are quite clear. He knew what he pleaded to and with what offence
he was charged.”
▪ NON QUOTATION OF SECTION NUMBER
It is important that the proper section must be quoted in the Charge. Non quotation of section
number is a curable irregularity but it shouldn’t be encouraged as it will cause incompetence and
recklessness on the party of the prosecutors. Therefore this irregularity is curable if 1. The accused
wasn’t prejudiced. 2. It was just a slip of the pen. 3. It wasn’t a result of mistake of law.
❖ CHARGE IN THE ALTERNATIVE
Sometimes facts alleged in a case may be such as to indicate that one or two offences was
committed. In such a case the way out of the problem is to prefer two counts in the alternative. For
example, a cashier is alleged to have occasioned a loss of tshs 5,000/=in cash. The facts are such
that he neither stole the money nor lost it as the result of negligence or misconduct. In such a case
two distinct counts may be preferred in the alternative, occasioning loss through negligence.
Where counts are so preferred, it is imperative that the words “In the alternative” must be included.
In other words, one count will allege the commission of one offence and below it will be the words:
“In the alternative” and then will follow the count alleging the commission of the second offence.
The omission of the words “In the alternative” will render the charge defective in that it will tend
to prejudice the accused defense.
The above position is affirmed in the case of R v Jumanne Mohamed32, The accused was charged
with unlawful wounding. After the prosecution witnesses had testified the public prosecutor
substituted a fresh charge of causing grievous harm. Without complying with the provisions of
31[1967] HCD NO. 345.

32
[1986] TLR 232
25
s.234 of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1984 the magistrate convicted the accused as charged and
sentenced him to three years' imprisonment. When the matter reached the High Court the learned
judge considered the effect of failure to comply with the provisions of s. 234 of the Criminal
Procedure Act, 1984, and held that Failure to comply with the provisions of s. 234(2) (a) of the
Criminal Procedure Act was in the instant case, a serious error capable in law of vitiating the
decision arrived at by the trial magistrate.
In the case of Thuway Akonaay v R 33 , where the appellant was originally charged with
threatening violence, but the charge was withdrawn and a new charge alleging arson was
substituted therefore. The appellant was not called to plead to the new charge, or first appeal the
judge was satisfied that provisions of s. 234 of the Criminal Procedure Act were complied with
because the appellant saw no need to recall previous witnesses immediately after the charge of
arson had been substituted for that threatening violence and PW.I alone had testified. Held: It is
mandatory for a plea to a new or altered charge to be taken from an accused person; failure to do
that renders a trial a nullity.
❖ REMIDIES ON DEFECTIVE CHARGES, SECTION 288-436 OF THE CPA.
A. Amendment of a charge.
When the charge is defective, the magistrate may do the following things: May amend it.
Substitute anew charge. Draw up an additional charge.
The magistrate may amend the charge which is defective either in substance or form provided that
the required amendments can be made without injustice. When the charge is amended or altered
formalities must be strictly followed as follows: the court must call upon the accused to plead
afresh to the altered charge. the accused person has the right to requested that any witnesses be
called to give evidence again or to be cross examined. the prosecution may call ad examine any
witnesses who may have been examined.
B. Withdraw and Re-Institution of a charge
This is governed under section 98 of the CPA. This is done by the Public Prosecutor at a stage of
the proceeding before judgment is pronounced. A Public Prosecutor must obtain the consent of the
court or may instruct by the Director of Public Prosecutions. Withdraw is done where the charge
is defective with a view of instituting a proper charge.
33[1987] TLR 92
26
Where the charge is withdrawn before the accused hasn’t defended himself he may be discharged.
This discharged will not operate as a bar to subsequent proceedings against him on account of the
same facts. This has been explained also in the case of Pagi Msemakweli v R 34, The court held
that the withdrawal of the charge under s 98(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act did not operate as a
bar to subsequent proceedings being preferred against the appellant on the same facts. The payment
or phoney payment made to PW 1 did not undo a criminal act which was already complete and the
offence of cattle theft was not capable of compromise.
C. Nole prosequi as per section 91 of the CPA.
Under this the prosecution stops the prosecutions by the DPP and the accused person is discharged.
This discharge is not a bar to any subsequent proceedings against him based on the same facts
should need arose. Withdraw of charge under section 91 of the CPA was discussed in the case of
R v Nicolaus Mamuu35, In this case while police investigations were still under way, and after he
had been charged with murder, the accused escaped from custody. About a year later, and on
application by the public prosecutor, the District Court of Rombo withdrew the charge against the
Accused in terms of Section 98(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act. On revision to this Court, the
Court restored the charge of murder against the Accused. It was held as follows: (i) Section 98
speak of the withdrawal of charges in respect of `any trial before a subordinate court'; and given
that the crime of murder is triable only before the High Court, the trial on the charge could only
have been properly brought before the High Court and thus Section 98 could not have been used
to withdraw the charge. (ii) The withdrawal of the charge in question should have been brought in
terms of Section 91(1). (iii) The order of the District Court is quashed and set aside, and the charge
of murder against the Accused is restored.
❖ PROCEDURE TO BE FOLLOWED WHERE CHARGE IS ARTERED,
SECTION 234(2) OF THE CPA.
It is provided under that provision that where a charge is altered under that subsection then the
court must follow the following procedures:
• The court shall thereupon call upon the accused person to plead to the altered charge.
• The accused may demand that the witnesses or any of them be recalled and give their
evidence afresh or be further cross-examined by the accused or his advocate and, in such
34[1997] TLR 331

35
[1996] TLR 154
27
last mentioned event, the prosecution shall have the right to re-examine any such witness
on matters arising out of such further cross-examination.
• The court may permit the prosecution to recall and examine, with reference to any
alteration of or addition to the charge that may be allowed, any witness who may have been
examined unless the court for any reason to be recorded in writing considers that the
application is made for the purpose of vexation, delay or for defeating the ends of justice.
In Andrea s/o Kimbulu V R36, accused was charged in Primary Court with housebreaking, theft,
and assault. At the close of the prosecution case, the magistrate substituted a charge of robbery
[P.C. s. 286], and accused was duly convicted of that offence. The record indicates that after the
original charges were read and the accused was addressed in terms of section 41(2) (b) of the
Magistrates Courts Act, he stated that he did not wish to be tried by the court. The record also
indicates that after the charge was altered and read to the accused, he denied guilt and was altered
and read to the accused, he denied guilt and was put upon his defense. The court, it was held that
“The alteration or substitution of the charge at the end of the case for the prosecution should have
been followed by the appellant being given the option recalling and previous witnesses and cross-
examining them the procedure outlined in s. 21 of the Third Schedule to the Magistrates Courts
Act.”
In Sephen s/o Munga V R37, the accused was initially charged with attempted murder, to which
he pleaded not guilty. After the prosecution had presented its evidence, the magistrate, finding that
the evidence did not show intent to murder, altered the charge to one of causing grievous harm.
The appellant was not required to plead to this charge, nor was he given the opportunity of recalling
the prosecution witnesses for cress-examination. After making his defense accused was convicted
of causing grievous bodily harm and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment. The court, it was held
that the trial was a nullity.
TOPIC SEVEN: THE ACCUSED’S PLEA
▪ Introduction
When an accused person is first brought before the court charged with an offence by which the
court has a competent jurisdiction to inquire or to try, the first thing as required by the law is the
36[1968] HCD NO. 312

37[1968] HCD NO. 225
28
Magistrate to ask him to plead to such charge; in other words the magistrate must read over and
explain the charge to the accused and ask the accused whether he admits or denies it. His reply
thereto is called his “plea”.
▪ Meaning of a plea
A plea is a reply to the charge about its truthfulness, the law requires that the substance of the
charge shall be stated to the accused person by the court and he shall be asked whether he admits
or denies the truth of the charge.
The accused then subject to the general right to remain silent, will have to plead either; (a) guilty 38
(b) not guilty39 (c) Autrefois convict or Autrefois acquit40(d) pardon41, (e) lack of jurisdiction of
the court to try the accused.
▪ Prerequisite of a plea
The plea should be personal, voluntary, done by a fit person, and free for nobody can be forced to
plead, an involuntary plead is void in law, it also must be done by a fit person capable of
understanding the proceedings and what he is pleading to, including the effect of his plea in law.
Thus when in the course of a trial the court has reason to believe that the accused is of unsound
mind and consequently incapable of making his defense it shall, before the inquiring into the fact
of such unsoundness of mind and notwithstanding the fact that the accused may not have pleaded
to the charge, call on the prosecution to give or adduce evidence in support of the charge. This
basically applies to the disabled and the insane (See section 216 of CPA).
▪ Categories of pleas
➢ Plea of guilty (Section 282 of CPA).
In simple terms, a plea of guilty means a confession to the offence charged. It further means that
the accused person having listened to the charge and its particulars admits their truthfulness. The
38 Section 282 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]

39
40
Section 280(1) (a) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
41 Section 280(1) (b) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
29
court is required to record everything the accused person says in his own words which indicate
that he has actually pleaded guilty.
This is important because as it was said in the case of Patrick Rimmer v R42, in which the court
stated” a plea of guilty has two effects; first of all, it is a confession of fact; secondly, it is such a
confession that without further evidence the court is entitled to and indeed in all proper
circumstance will act upon it and result in a conviction.
A plea also must be clear and free from ambiguities, that is to say it must be an unequivocal plea.
Pleas like” Iam sorry”,” that is correct”, “I admit”, it is true“, “It is true but... “,”I did it because”,
“I did wrong”, are for practical reasons not clear and full of ambiguities. They are said to be
equivocal, therefore an equivocal plea simply means an ambiguous or vague plea that is a plea in
which it is not clear whether the accused denies or admits the truth of the charge.
The statement above can be verified in the case of defilement as the best example, thus when the
accused pleads “it is true” he might be admitting to the act of having the carnal knowledge with
the girl but not aware that she is under the age of fourteen. It is for this reason that the court must
explain to the accused all the facts and the ingredients of the offense and ask him to plead all of
them.
As evidenced in the case of Nyaku Ntandu v R43, where it was Held: (1) In the circumstances,
and considering that the facts recited by the prosecution were not inconsistent with the accused’s
statement, if accused thought, as he had reason to believe, that the man who came to his house late
at night was “an enemy,” this would be a defense to the charge. (2) Accused did not unequivocally
plead guilty to the charge. Conviction quashed.
In Musau s/o Muya v R44 , it is well settled that the word “nilikosa” meaning “I have done
wrong” by itself should not be treated as unequivocal plea of guilty without enquiry as to what it
was that the appellant admitted he had done.
Where, therefore, an accused person unequivocally pleads guilty to a charge, he will be found
guilty of the offence charged and will be convicted on his own plea. Thus “If the accused person
42[1972] 56 Cr. App. R. 196

43
[1968] HCD 56
44
[1962] E.A. 643
30
admits the truth of the charge , his admission shall be recorded as nearly as possible in the words
he uses and the magistrate shall convict him and pass sentence upon or make an order against him,
unless there appears to be sufficient cause to the contrary”
It is also for the reasons that judicial wisdom has developed to the extent that no conviction can be
entertained unless the prosecution gives the facts of the case by facts in this case it is the summary
of the evidence which the prosecution would have tendered had the accused pleaded not guilty to
the charge. There after the magistrate to ask himself “whether or not the facts constitute the offence
charged. If he is not satisfied, he will record a plea of “not guilty” and witness will then have to be
called to prove the charge. If on the other hand, the magistrate is satisfied that the facts do constitute
the charge, he will turn to the accused and ask him if he has understood the facts and what he has
to say about their correctness or otherwise. If the accused says that those facts are correct, the
magistrate will record a conviction against him.
The Holding in the case of Adan v R45 , the court of appeal for East Africa reiterated the above
point and said “The statement of facts serves two purposes; it enables the magistrate to satisfy
himself that the plea of guilty was really unequivocal and that the accused has no defense and it
gives the magistrate the basic material on which to assess sentence. It not infrequently happens
that an accused, after hearing the statement of the facts, disputes some particular fact or alleges
some additional fact, showing that he did not really understand the position when he pleaded
guilty; it is for this reason that it is essential for the statement of the facts to precede the conviction.
▪ Plea of not guilty (Section 279 and 283 of CPA)
It means denial of the accusation charged against the accused that is the accused disagrees to the
expressed charge by the court to him in such terms as “it is not true”, “it is a lie”, and so on the
magistrate must record that as a plea of “not guilty”.
If the accused denies the allegations read before him by the court of competent jurisdiction to try
or inquire the case then the court as required by the law will enter a plea of not guilty to the accused
and that means that the accused is putting in issue everything that has been alleged against him
and so it will be for the prosecution to prove every fact and circumstance alleged against him.
45
[1973] E.A. 445
31
A plea of not guilty is necessitated by a direct plea of not guilty, an equivocal plea of guilty,
accused standing mute, failure by cooperation to enter an appearance, accused failure to enter
appearance or remaining at large.
▪ Accused standing mute (Section 281 of CPA)
If the accused person refuses to plead, the court shall order a plea of not guilty to be entered for
him. The magistrate in some cases may come across accused persons who refuse to plead to a
charge, or stand mute or not to answer directly to the charge as nobody can be forced to plead. In
such case if the magistrate is satisfied that the accused has understood the charge is required by
the law to enter a “plea of not guilty” to the charge and the accused will be taken to have so pleaded.
Muteness of an accused person may be for out of malice or through the visitation of God. If
therefore an accused person stands mute, a magistrate should hold inquiry to into such muteness.
The said accused is mute out of malice where he fully understands the charge against him and can
defend himself in the normal way but he deliberately stands mute. If the magistrate should after
such inquiry, find the accused to be mute of malice, he will enter a plea of not guilty and proceed
to try the charge.
An accused person is said to be mute by the visitation of God if he is deaf and dumb, or is suffering
from some disease of mind, or is so deaf that he cannot hear when the charge is read over to him.
Such an accused person can, if he is sane, be tried if he can read or write, or if intelligence can be
conveyed to him by signs or symbols.
▪ Pleas of “autrefois convict” and “autrefois acquit” and” pardon”(Section 280 (1) (a)
As an accepted general principle in the administration of criminal justice “that no person shall be
tried twice for the same offence arising out of the same facts provided that the previous acquittal
or conviction has not been set aside or revised or where the original court had no jurisdiction to
try the subsequent charge. Knowing that the plea is one of autrefois acquit or autrefois convict will
lie in the accused person’s reply to the charge. The accused person may plead by saying “I was
convicted of that charge by this court last year or I was acquitted on that charge, or I have been
pardoned at law for this offence or some other statement to that effect” If the accused pleads that
he has been previously acquitted of the same offence or he has obtained a pardon at law for his
32
offence, the court shall first try whether or not in fact such plea is true. For this purpose and
depending on the nature of the plea, the court may receive in evidence court proceedings in the
alleged previous trial and any document related there to, and such other evidence as may be
relevant for a decision in the matter.
▪ Change of pleas
It sometimes happens that on the first occasion the accused pleads guilty or indicates that he is
pleading guilty. But on a subsequent occasion he reconsiders his plea and wants to change it to
one of “not guilty”. In such a case the magistrate may allow him to do so.
The law is that where an accused person pleads guilty to a charge, a magistrate has the discretion
to allow the accused to change his plea from one of guilty to the one of not guilty, provided that
such change of plea is sought to be made at any stage of the trial before sentence is passed or
before a final order disposing of the case is made.
Authority for this proposition is in the case of Kamundi v R 46, where it was held that the pleas
were unequivocal and that the court had no power to quash its own conviction and refused to allow
the appellant to change his plea.
On second appeal it was argued that a magistrate should be able to alter a plea of guilty at any time
before pronouncing sentence. Conversely as was stated in Kamundi’s case a magistrate may allow
an accused person at any time in the course of trial to change his plea from one of not guilty to
the one of guilty.
If the change is made after the substance of the prosecution’s case has already been given in
evidence and magistrate holds the view that such evidence discloses the offence charged, he can
sum up such evidence to the accused person and ask him if he admits the same. If the accused
accepts the evidence so summed up as the truth then the magistrate will proceed to record the
conviction on the accused owns plea.
But if the change in plea is made earlier the magistrate will call upon the public prosecutor to
narrate the facts as usual.
46
[1973] E.A
33
TOPIC EIGHT: BAIL AND BOND
The law relating to bail is founded on the Constitution 47 generally and the Criminal Procedure
Act48 in particular.
❖ Meaning of Bail and Bond
Bail, may be defined as an agreement between the accused (and his sureties as the case may be)
and the court that the accused will pay a certain sum of money fixed by the court, should he fail to
appear to attend his trial on a certain date 49.
A bond, on the other hand is the sum of money which the person to be released (or his surety)
binds himself to pay, if he fails to appear or attend his trial on the agreed date.
Recognizance, is an obligation entered into and recorded before a court or magistrate by which a
person engages himself to perform some act or observe some conditions such as to appear when
called on or to pay a debt or to keep the peace. Usually a certain amount of money is attached to it
and may be forfeited if the person neglects to observe the conditions.
Sureties are persons who enter into recognizance to produce the person who has been bailed. It is
a pledge by another person to pay a fixed sum of money to the government if the accused person
doesn’t appeal before the court or the police station on a specified date.
Security, it is the amount of money which the accused person will be required to pay should the
accused person default.
➢ The guiding provisions regarding bail are to be found in sub-section one of section 148 of
the Criminal Procedure Act which states.
❖ Purpose of Bail or Bond
In Jaffer V R50, it was stated that“…The primary object of remanding an accused in custody is to
ensure that he will appear to take his trial and not seek to evade justice by leaving the jurisdiction
of the court…”
The prime purpose of bail stem its root from the principle of the presumption of innocence which
is enshrined in the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, which in Article 13 (6) (b)
47
Article 13(6) (b) of URT Constitution as amended time to time
48
See sections 148 & 163 of the Criminal Procedure Act .
49
Brown, D. (1970). Criminal Procedure in Uganda and Kenya (2nd Ed), Sweet and Maxwell, London.
50[1972] HCD NO. 92
34
provides for the presumption of innocence of every person charged with a criminal offence.
Consequently, bail secures a temporary release of an accused person upon certain conditions
pending the finalization of court proceedings. The purpose of bail therefore, is to shield the
individual arrested from being incarcerated prior to his guilt being established in court, because
until such time as his guilt is proven, the person is, at law, presumed to be innocent.
❖ Is Bail a matter of right or privilege?
As stated earlier on bail is a security required by the court or police for the release of an Accused
person or a prisoner who must appear in Court or police station in a future time 51. The security
given can be in form of cash, bond, or word from a reputable surety. In Tanzania bail can be sought
and be granted by only two institutions.
(a) By Police, the Criminal Procedure Act gives power of granting bail to police. However,
police bail can only be obtain when the matter yet to be instituted before the Court of law.
(b) By the Court, when the case is instituted before the court of law, police power to grant
bail is curtailed. Under this situation bail can only be sought in court.
In that sense it is very clear under the Tanzania legal position, that there are bailable offences and
non-bailable offences. And bail can only be granted on bailable offences. For bailable offences
bail is a right though it is not an absolute right because it depends on court discretion and
fulfillment of bail conditions.
The decision on whether to grant or not to grant bail rests on the court. Right to bail draws its
genesis from the principle of presumption of innocence which is enshrined under Art 13 (6) of the
Constitution of the United Republic Tanzania. Mwisumo, J in the case of Tito Douglas Lyimo v
R52, stated “Bail is a right and not a privilege to an Accused person.” Therefore, under our law
accused person is entitled with right to bail. From that premise it is therefore argued that denial of
bail to an accused person without legal justification amount to infringement of constitutional right.
51
Blacks’ Law Dictionary 9th ED
52
[1978] LRT 55
35
The same position was affirmed in the case of Patel v R53, where Biron, J held “a man whilst
awaiting trial is as of right entitled to bail, as there is a presumption of innocence until the contrary
is proved…”
❖ Bail by Police Officers

A person arrested without warrant by a police officer must be charged before a court of law within
twenty four hours of such arrest 54, where after twenty-four hours after the person was arrested, no
formal charge has been laid against him he must be set free unless the police officer in question
reasonably believes that the offence suspected to have been committed is a serious one 55.
Where a person was arrested without warrant and a formal charge has been laid against him while
under the custody of the police; but there is insufficient evidence on which to proceed with the
charge and thus further inquiries must be carried out or the offence does not appear to be a serious
one; a police officer in charge of a police station may, upon that person executing a bond, with or
without sureties, to appear before a court if so required, release him on police bail 56.
When a person is admitted to bail by a police officer, no bail money is paid to such police officer;
instead the person may be required to execute a bond with or without sureties, to appear before
such police officer at a date to be determined by such police officer. To this effect section 31 (4)
of the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act provides: “Notwithstanding any other written law
for the time being in force relating to the grant of bail by police officers, no fee or duty shall be
chargeable upon bail bonds in criminal cases, recognizance to prosecute or to give evidence, or
recognizance for personal appearance or otherwise issued or taken by a police officer”.
❖ Matters Relevant to the Grant of Police Bail
Section 65 of the CPA lays down three categories of matters (criteria’s) which police officers
must take into account when considering the grant of police bail that is:-
❖ Those related to the probability of the person appearing in court such as his community
ties, residence, employment, the circumstances in which the offence was committed, the
seriousness of the offence the strength of the evidence etc. (See section 65 (a) of CPA).
53[1971] HCD 391

54
See section 31 of the Police Force and Auxiliary Services Act, [Cap 322 R.E 2002].
55
Section 64 (1) (c) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
56Section 64(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
36
❖ Those related to the interests of the person himself such as the period that the person may
be obliged to spend in custody if bail is refused, the conditions under which he would be
held in custody, the needs of the person to obtain legal advice, or the need of the person for
physical protection etc. (See section 65 (b) of CPA).
❖ Those related to protection of the community such as the likelihood of the person
interfering with the evidence through intimidating witnesses or hindering police inquiries
in any other way. (See section 65 (c) of CPA).
❖ Entitlement to Police Bail
The right to liberty of the individual is guaranteed under Article 15 of the Constitution of the
United Republic and consequently a person under police custody who fulfils the conditions lay
down by section 66 CPA becomes entitled to the grant of police bail. The conditions are:-
❖ Undertaking in writing to appear before a specified court at a specified time and place, or
at such other time and place as is notified to him by a police officer;
❖ Undertaking in writing to observe specified requirements as to his conduct while released
on bail,
❖ Getting another person acceptable to the police to acknowledge in writing, that he is
acquainted with him and regards him as a responsible person who is likely to appear in
court to answer the charge;
❖ The accused himself or another person acceptable to the police, entering into an agreement,
with or without security, to forfeit a specified sum of money in the event he fails to appear
in court to answer the charge;
❖ The accused himself or another person acceptable to the police, depositing with the police,
a specified sum of money to be forfeited in the event he fails to appear in court to answer
the charge.
❖ Refusal to Grant Police Bail Police
Bail must not be unreasonably refused. It can only be refused for good cause; and where a police
officer refuses to grant bail, not only must he record in writing the reasons for so refusing but also
must, cause the person so refused police bail to be brought before a magistrate as soon as is
practicable to be dealt with in accordance with law. (See section 67 (1) - (2) CPA).
37
❖ Breach of Conditions and Revocation of Police Bail

Police bail may be revoked and the person arrested if the police believe he is absconding or
planning to abscond or to breach an undertaking he made as a condition for bail. (See section 68
CPA). And unreasonable failure to comply with an undertaking given by a person as a condition
of his release is an offence which on conviction attracts a penalty not exceeding the maximum
penalty that could be imposed on him upon conviction for the offence in respect of which he was
arrested and then released on bail (See section 69 (1) of the CPA).
❖ Statutory Restriction to Police Bail
The following categories of persons may not be admitted to bail by a police officer: (see section
148 (4) and (5) of the CPA).
❖ Certificate of the DPP under Section 148 (4) CPA: Where the Director of Public
Prosecutions has issued a certificate to the effect that the release of such person is likely to
prejudice the safety or interests of the Republic, (CPA)
❖ The person is charged with murder, treason, armed robbery, or defilement; illicit
trafficking in drugs against the Drugs and Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Drugs Act, an
offence involving heroin, cocaine, prepared opium, opium poppy (papaver setigerum) etc.
❖ Bail by the Court
A court may admit to bail at any stage of the proceedings a person who appears before it, charged
with an offence. Admission to bail by a court may be by taking bail from such person or by
requiring him to execute a bond with or without sureties. Admission to bail by a court is also
subject to the provisions of section 148 of the Criminal Procedure Act which lays down
circumstances under which an accused person may not be admitted to bail by a court of law.
❖ Under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act
The power and jurisdiction to grant bail where economic and organized crimes are concerned is
determined in accordance with the stage at which the proceedings have reached at the time the
application for bail is filed. If the application for bail is presented between the stages of arrest and
committal of the accused for trial by the Economic Court; the application will be heard and
determined by the district court or court of a resident magistrate 57.
57
Section 29 (4) (a) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, [Cap. 200 R.E 2002]
38
On the other hand if the application for bail is presented after committal or during the trial by the
(Economic) Court; the application for bail shall be considered and determined by the Economic
Court. Finally in all cases where the value of the property involved exceeds ten million shillings
jurisdiction to consider an application for bail, at any stage of the proceedings, shall lie in the High
Court58.
❖ Who may apply for bail?
Bail may be said to bear broad similarities with the writ of Habeas Corpus. In principle any person
who is able to show sufficient cause in the matter may apply for the release on bail of any person
detained. Thus the accused on the day of his first appearance in court may stand up and ask for
bail. Where the accused is already in custody; his advocate, friend or relative may all apply for
bail on his behalf. If the accused person is illiterate and unaware of his constitutional rights to bail,
the court has a role to play by informing him of his right to bail. If the Prosecuting Attorney has
no objection to the grant of bail, and the accused person is able to produce credible sureties, the
court may proceed to admit him to bail.
❖ Formalities for the Grant of Bail in Subordinate Courts
In practice there are two scenarios under which bail may be applied for and granted in a subordinate
court namely: on first appearance in court when the suspect is charged with an offence. In such an
instance the accused person or his advocate may stand up and apply for bail and such application
will be considered by the court accordingly. The second scenario is when the accused is already in
remand prison. In such a case if the court deems it expedient it will issue a removal order in
advance of the hearing of the application for bail or after bail has been granted; whichever
procedure is more convenient for the court.
❖ Stages in hearing and determination of application for bail
There are five stages in the hearing and determination of an application for bail. The first is the
submission of the application for bail to the court by the accused person, his advocate or a relative.
The second stage is for the court to ask the Prosecuting Attorney whether he has any objection to
58
See section 29 (4) (b) – (d) Economic and Organized Crimes Control Act, [Cap. 200 R.E 2002]
39
the grant of bail or whether there are any legal impediments to the grant of bail; for instance
whether in the instant case bail is proscribed under section 148 (4) – (5) CPA. The third stage is
the decision of the court. The granting or refusing to grant bail by courts of law in respect of
bailable offences is a matter in the discretion of the Judge or magistrate. Since this is a judicial
discretion it must be exercised judicially. The fourth stage is the decision of the court as to the
conditions to impose on the grant of bail. In relation to the conditions to impose the court may be
guided by the provisions of section 148 (6) & (7) CPA; for instance: surrender of passport,
restriction to movement, periodic reporting to a police station, and abstention from visiting
specified localities or premises etc. In any case the court may impose any other condition which
in the court’s opinion appears proper and just and will ensure the appearance of the accused person
for the trial of his case.(See section 148 (7) (c) CPA). The fifth and final stage is the requirement
of the accused to execute a bond with or without sureties as the court may determine in accordance
with the circumstances of the case.
❖ Considerations to be taken into account in bail applications
There are a number of considerations to be taken into account in bail applications, in addition to
those fixed by statute. In any case, depending on the facts and circumstances of each case, the
court must be satisfied that the case in point meets the test in bail applications. As to the test in
bail applications, it is now settled law that the true test is whether the granting of the application
“will be detrimental to the interests of justice and good order” and the keeping of public peace 59.
To that effect the following are a few of the considerations the court must take into account in
considering whether to grant or refuse a bail application.
❖ Whether the applicant is likely to interfere with investigations. If investigations or

witnesses are interfered with by the accused or third parties, no fair trial can take place.
The court must therefore consider this. If the court is satisfied that the accused person
would so interfere or has already started to interfere, the application for bail should be
refused. However an allegation as to such interference or possible interference must be
satisfactorily proved by the Prosecuting Attorney. In Bhagwanji Kakubhai’s case (supra)
Wilson Ag. CJ said “ There should be a definite allegation of tampering or attempted
59
See Bhagwanji Kakubhai v. R. I TLR (R) 144
40
tampering… supported by proved or admitted facts showing reasonable cause for the belief
that such interference with the course of justice was likely to occur if the accused is
released”.
❖ Whether the applicant will abscond.
❖ Whether the applicant is likely to commit other offences while on bail.
❖ Whether release of the applicant will adversely affect peace and good order. This is in
accordance with the test in all bail applications which we saw above: “whether the grant of
bail would be detrimental to the interests of justice and good order and the keeping of
public peace”. In Abdul Nassor v. R 60, where the accused was charged with offences of
assault and the prosecution resisted an application for bail, on the ground iter alia that if
released on bail there would be unrest or further breach of the peace among Somalis and
Baluchis in the Nzega area where the offence was alleged to have been committed; the
High Court granted the application for bail, stating that it thought law enforcement
authorities would cope with such a situation if it arose. Nevertheless the High Court took
heed of the allegation, for one of the conditions it attached to the bail was that the accused
should remain in Tabora and its immediate environs (some seventy five miles from Nzega)
until it became necessary for him to go to Nzega to take his trial.
❖ Whether the offence is a serious one. It is logical that the more serious the offence the
greater the punishment it attracts, and the greater will be the accused person’s temptation
to flee and to evade justice.
❖ Whether the sureties are reliable. In essence bailis the delivery of a party accused of a
crime into the hands of his sureties. As such, the accused person is accounted by law to be
in the custody of his sureties, who binds themselves on the pain of forfeiting their bonds,
to produce the accused before the court on an appointed day. It is therefore logical that the
sureties should satisfy the court that they are reliable members of the society and are able
to ensure that the accused will be there to take his trial. The court must therefore enquire
into the reliability and substantiality of the proposed sureties. A known criminal or a person
who is himself facing a criminal charge would definitely not be a reliable surety.
❖ Whether the applicant has a known and reliable domicile.
60
[1945] I TANGANYIKA LAW REPORTS 289
41
❖ How long has the applicant been in custody?, the nature of the evidence in support of
the charge. In a situation where the application for bail is made when the hearing is already
under way the court is perfectly entitled to take into account the strength of the evidence
so far received. If the evidence suggests that there is a strong case against the applicant,
and the offence is one of those that attract a custodial sentence, it would be wise for the
court to refuse to grant the application.
❖ The age of the applicant. In appropriate cases the age of the applicant may be taken into
account. It is felt that, as far as possible, young children ought not to be kept in custody
where their character is likely to be soiled by rubbing shoulders with hard-core criminals.
In most cases it is neither in the interests of such children nor those of Society to remand
them in custody.
❖ Powers of the High Court to Grant Bail
Being the highest court of record the High Court has unlimited jurisdiction in relation to matters
of bail. More specifically it has the following powers, to vary terms of bail by lower court which
includes deciding appeals against refusal to grant bail by a subordinate court. (See section 149
CPA), to order sufficient bail when that first taken is insufficient, (See section 154 CPA), to direct
levy of amount due on certain recognizance (See section 162 CPA).
Under the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, where the value of the property involved
exceeds ten million shillings; jurisdiction to consider an application for bail is vested in the High
Court61.
❖ Statutory Restrictions to Bail
The principal restrictions to the power of the court to grant bail are to be found in section 148 of
the Criminal Procedure Act and sections 29 and 35 of the Economic and Organised Crimes Control
Act. The restrictions to the grant of bail fall under two categories; firstly offences which are by
law declared to be non-bailable and secondly offences in respect of which bail may be restricted
under certain circumstances, although they are ordinarily bailable.
61
See section 29 (4) (d) Economic and Organised Crimes Control Act
42
❖ Non-bailable offences, In terms of Section 148 (5) CPA a person charged with the
following offences may not be granted bail by a police officer or a court. The offences
falling in that category are: • murder, treason, armed robbery, or defilement, • illicit
trafficking in drugs against the Drugs and Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Drugs Act, • an
offence involving heroin, cocaine, prepared opium, opium poppy (papaver setigerum),
poppy straw, coca plant, coca leaves, cannabis sativa or cannabis resin (Indian hemp),
methaqualone (mandrax), catha edulis (khat) or any other narcotic drug or psychotropic
substance, where the value of such drugs has been certified by the Commissioner for
National Co-ordination of Drugs Control Commission, as exceeding ten million shillings.
❖ Restrictions on Bailable Offences
Section 148 (4) and (5) (b) – (e) CPA provides that bail may not be granted by a police officer or
a court under the following circumstances, that is:
• If the Director of Public Prosecutions, certifies in writing that it is likely that the safety or
interests of the Republic would thereby be prejudiced; (See section 148 (4) CPA).
• if it appears that the accused person has previously been sentenced to imprisonment for a
term exceeding three years, (See section 148 (5) (b) CPA)
• If it appears that the accused person has previously been granted bail by a court and failed
to comply with the conditions of the bail or absconded; (See section 148 (5) (c) CPA). It
may be noted in analysis of this provision that failure to comply with conditions of bail
will, as a matter of logic, include commission of an offence while on bail.
• If it appears to the court that it is necessary that the accused person be kept in custody for
his own protection or safety; (See section 148 (5) (d) CPA),
• If the offence with which the person is charged involves actual money or property whose
value exceeds ten million shillings unless that person deposits cash or other property
equivalent to half the amount or value of actual money or property involved and the rest is
secured by execution of a bond: (See section 148 (5) (e) CPA. The condition of depositing
cash does not apply to police bail since in terms of section 31(4) of the Police Force and
Auxiliary Services Act; no fee is chargeable on police bail.
• If the act or acts constituting the offence with which a person is charged consists of a
serious assault causing grievous harm on or a threat of violence to another person or of
43
having, or possessing a firearm or an explosive. This provision was added to the CPA by
virtue of an amendment introduced by Act No. 12 of 1987.
❖ Conditions of Bail
There are two types of conditions that may be imposed by the court on the grant of bail that is;
mandatory conditions which must be imposed and discretionary conditions which may be imposed
at the option of the court.
❖ Mandatory Conditions
Section 148 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act lays down the following mandatory conditions, that
is:
• Surrender by the accused person to the police of his passport or any other travel document;
and
• Restriction of the movement of the accused to the area of the town, village or other area of
his residence.
❖ Discretionary Conditions
Section 148 (7) CPA provides that the court may also impose any one or more of the following
conditions which appear to the court to be likely to result in the appearance of the accused for the
trial or resumption of the trial at the time and place required or as may be necessary in the interests
of justice or for the prevention of crime, namely:-
• Requiring the accused to report at specified intervals to a police station or other authority
within the area of his residence;
• Requiring the accused to abstain from visiting a particular locality or premises, or
associating with certain specified persons, or o any other condition which the court may
deem proper and just to impose in addition to the preceding conditions.
44
❖ Bail Pending Appeal, Revision or Confirmation of Sentence.

❖ Bail Pending Appeal
Bail pending appeal is encompassed by the provision of section 368(1) of Criminal Procedure Act.
Upon recording in writing a reasonable cause, the court may grant bail to a person who has been
sentenced to a term in prison pending hearing his or her appeal.
This section does not specify which reasons are ‘reasonable causes to suffice the grant of bail’.
But the court throughout practices, it has set some pre-condition tests by which an applicant must
suffice for successful grant of bail pending appeal.
It was held by Bahati, J in the case of R v Nicholas Alfred Kiyabo62, that “for bail pending Appeal
to succeed there has to be overwhelming chances of success of the appeal filed and not chances of
success.” This is the classical and old test in court practice by which some judges avoid applying
it as it attract premature discussion on merit of the appeal. Where Shangwa, J. in Amiri Mohamed
vs. R63, found that:-“Illness such as hypertension, diabetes, and high blood pressure which does
not suit poor prison condition is a good ground for bail pending appeal”.
The most fundamental ground for consideration in bail pending appeal is whether the appeal has
an overwhelming chance of success, and where this is shown then there is no justification for
depriving the applicant of his freedom. This rule was laid down in Lamba v. R64, as the test in
applications for bail pending appeal.
However, Courts have formed two tests for granting bail pending appeal. According to the Judge,
Bail pending appeal is only granted on exceptional circumstances and where the applicant has
shown that the appeal have overwhelming chances of success.
Therefore, It can be stated that as far as Bail pending appeal is concern, there are two test to be
carried out for the court to determine whether to grant or not, namely:-
62
[1987] TLR 39
63
Crim. Ap. No. 170 of 2004 HC of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam (unreported).
64[1958] EA 3376
45
• Overwhelming chances of success of the appeal filed and • Exceptional circumstances which
includes illness which does not suit poor prison conditions.
❖ Bail Pending Revision
Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Act empowers the High Court to call for records of a
subordinate (magistrate’s) court for the purpose of examining them and satisfying itself as to the
correctness, legality or propriety of any finding, sentence or order recorded or passed by such
court. The Magistrates’ Courts Act also grants similar powers to District Courts in relation to
records of Primary Courts. (See section 22 of Magistrates’ Courts Act. The process of revision is
an alternative to an appeal. There is nothing in the Criminal Procedure Act to suggest that the
accused person cannot petition the High Court for revision in fitting cases.
❖ Bail Pending Confirmation of Sentence
Section 172 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act empowers a subordinate court which passes a
sentence requiring confirmation to release the person sentenced on bail pending confirmation of
the sentence by the confirming court. If the accused person may not have been released on bail
pending confirmation by the subordinate court, the person would be released on bail pending
confirmation of sentence by the High Court because sub-section five of section 172 of the CPA
empowers the High Court exercising confirmation jurisdiction to exercise the same powers as it
exercises in relation to revision, which as we saw include the grant of bail.
❖ Consequences of Bail Defaults (Breach of the Conditions of Bail)
There are two situational settings under which breach of bail conditions may occur: firstly on
discovery of the intention of the person admitted to bail to escape and consequent cancellation of
his bail by arresting him and secondly abscondence of the person admitted to bail.
❖ On Discovery of an Intention to Escape

• Cancellation of Bail: Section 157 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that if a police
officer:
• Has reasonable grounds for believing that a person released on bail is likely to break the
condition that he will appear at the time and place required or any other condition on which
he was admitted to bail,
46
• Or is notified in writing by any surety for the person admitted to bail that the surety believes
that that person is likely to break the condition that he will appear at the time and place
required and for that reason the surety wishes to be relieved of his obligation as surety,
• Police officer may arrest without warrant such person who has been admitted to bail, and
produce him before the court which granted such bail or preferably the court before which
he is required for resumption of the trial.
• And before such court a person who is arrested on reasonable suspicion of planning to
abscond or breach the conditions attached to his bail may not be considered for further bail
in the same case. As such his bail is for all intents and purposes effectively cancelled. (See
section 158 CPA).
❖ Abscondence of the person Admitted to Bail
Confiscation of his Property: Section 159 of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that if
a person admitted to bail absconds or conceals himself so that he may not be arrested and
fails to appear in court on the day fixed:
• such of his property, movable or immovable, as is commensurate to the monetary
value of any property involved in the case, may be confiscated by attachment, o
and the trial in respect of that person will continue irrespective of the stage of the
trial when the accused absconds,
• After sufficient efforts have been made to trace him and compel his attendance.
❖ Discharge of Sureties
There are three situational settings on the occasion of which the bond of a surety may be
discharged, namely: on application by the surety, on death of the surety and on finalization of the
case.
• On Application of the Surety, A person who stood as surety for the appearance and
attendance of a person released on bail may at any time apply to a magistrate to discharge
the bond either wholly or so far as it relates to the applicant or applicants.
• On receipt of the application the magistrate shall cause the person on bail to be brought
before him and he shall direct the bond to be discharged, and call upon such person to find
another surety. If he fails to do so the magistrate may commit him to prison. (See section
155 CPA).
47
• On Death of the Surety, if the surety dies, his bond will be discharged. In such an event
the court may require the accused person to find a new surety unless the circumstances of
the case are such as to show that the reduction of the bond by the death of the surety will
not jeopardize the interests of justice. (See section 156 CPA).
❖ On finalization of the Case
When the case against the accused person in respect of which the bond was executed is finalized
the bonds are automatically discharged. If a sum of money was deposited as cash bail that sum of
money is refundable.
❖ Forfeiture of Recognizance
When a surety executes a bond or enters a recognizance, he binds himself to ensure that the accused
person will appear and take his trial. Therefore when the accused person jumps bail or absconds,
• The court which released the accused person on bail will call upon the surety to show
cause why the bond should not be forfeited, or
• If he fails to show good cause, he may be ordered to pay the whole or such lesser sum of
the bond as the court may deem just,
• If he fails to raise the money, his movable property may be attached and sold to recover
an amount equivalent to the value of the bond. (See section 160 CPA).
TOPIC TEN: PRELIMINARY HEARING (PH)
▪ Meaning of Preliminary Hearing (PH)
Manner on which preliminary hearing is conducted is stipulated under section 192 of CPA.
Admittedly, this is an important stage where the parties meet to draft a memorandum of agreed
fact so as to expedite the case speed. The parties have to meet decide on what matters are not in
dispute and those matters are not supposed to be brought during trials neither party is required to
prove any of those facts except the facts in dispute only. In Emmanuel Malahya V. R65, the court
65
Cr Appeal no. 212 of 2004
48
has audibly argued that preliminary hearing is NOT hearing but as the phrase suggest, it is a
Preliminary inquiry of facts‟.
▪ Effects of not conducting Preliminary Hearing
In Charles Widman V R66, Munuo, J, stated that, non compliance with section 192 of the Criminal
Procedure Act that is failure by the Court to hold a preliminary hearing does not vitiated the trial
if the accused person was not prejudiced. However conducting a preliminary hearing is a necessary
prerequisite in a criminal trial. It is not discretionary. The procedures stipulated under s. 192 are
mandatory. And needless to say, s. 192 was enacted in order to minimize delays and costs in the
trial of criminal cases. However, in the most unlikely 2 event that a preliminary hearing is not
conducted in a criminal case that trial that proceeds without it will not automatically be vitiated,
the proceedings could be vitiated depending on the nature of a particular case …..”(See also Pagi
Msemakweli v. Republic, (1997) TLR 331)
▪ Does Preliminary Hearing subject to every case?
Preliminary Hearing is not likely to be conducted in every cases, this stage of criminal procedure
is sought to be conducted only when the accused has pleaded not guilty to the charge as per section
192 of the said Law and is normally done in open court in the presence of the accused or his
advocate (if he is represented by an advocate) and the public prosecutor.
▪ Aim of conducting preliminary hearing
The general purpose or aim of conducting preliminary hearing is to ascertain which matter are in
dispute and which are specifically not, therefore in ascertaining such matters that are not in dispute
the court shall explain to an accused who is not represented by an advocate about the nature and
purpose of the preliminary hearing and may put questions to the parties as it thinks fit; and the
answers to the questions may be given without oath or affirmation as per section 192(2) of CPA.
▪ Effect of conducting Preliminary Hearing
One of the effects of Preliminary Hearing is that, normally after its conclusion a draft or a
memorandum of agreed facts is prepared and it has to be red over and being explained in language
which is understood by the accused, and then finally being signed by the accused and his advocate
66
Criminal Appeal No. 72 of 1999
49
(if any) and by the public prosecutor, and then filed. This is provided under Section 192(3) of CPA.
The fact contained in the memorandum will be deemed to have been dully proved, unless the
contrary is demanded, as per Section 192(4) of the said law.
Also, if circumstances permit then the accused person will be tried immediately on the conclusion
of Preliminary Hearing or the case can be adjourned due to absence of witness or any other cause
as per section 192(5) of the Law.
TOPIC ELEVEN: SUMMONING WITNESS, EXAMINATION OF WITNESS AND

HEARING
▪ Summons Generally
Summons is a written official document issued by the court requiring a person to procure his
appearance before the court on material date, time and place indicated on such document for the
purpose of either defending himself, or to give evidence. The provision of section 100 of CPA
require that such document shall be in writing, in duplicate and being bearing a seal of presiding
officer of the court.
▪ Service of summons
It’s the requirement of the law that summons must be dully served to the person required to appear
before the court of law and such service must be made in person either by a police officer or by an
officer of the court issuing it or other public servant or such other person as the court may direct,
and every person on whom a summons is so served shall, if so required by the serving officer, sign
a receipt for it on the back of the other duplicate, (See Section 101 of CPA).
▪ Mode of serving a summons

➢ Mode of Service when person summoned cannot be found
Subject to the provision of section 102 of CPA, where the person summoned cannot by the exercise
of due diligence be found, the summons may be served by leaving one of the duplicates for him
with some adult member of his family or with an adult servant residing with him or with his
50
employer; and the person with whom the summons is so left shall, if so required by the serving
officer, sign a receipt for it on the back of the other duplicate.
➢ Mode of serving a summons when service cannot be personally effected
If the service in the manner provided by sections 101 or 102 cannot by the exercise of due
diligence be effected, the serving officer shall affix one of the duplicates of the summons to some
conspicuous part of the house or homestead in which the person summoned ordinarily resides and
thereupon the summons shall be deemed to have been duly served, (See Section 103 of CPA).
➢ Service on servant of Government
Where the person summoned is in the active service of any department of the Government or of a
public corporation, the court issuing the summons shall ordinarily send it in duplicate to the head
of the department or public corporation, as the case may be, in which the person is so employed,
and the head shall thereupon cause the summons to be served in the manner provided by section
101 and shall return it to the court under his signature with the endorsement required by that
section, (See Section 104 of CPA).
➢ Service on company
Service of summons on an incorporated company may be effected by serving it on the secretary,

local manager or other principal officer of the company at the registered officer of such company
of by registered letter addressed to the chief executive officer of the company and in the case of a
registered letter, service shall be deemed to have been effected when the letter would arrive in the
ordinary course of post, (See Section 105 of CPA).
➢ Service outside local limits of jurisdiction
When a court desires that a summons issued by it shall be served at any place outside the local
limits of its jurisdiction, it shall send the summons in duplicate to a magistrate within the local
limits of whose jurisdiction the person summoned resides or is to be served, (See section 107 of
CPA).
51
▪ Summons to witness
After the preliminary hearing has been conducted, the court will set a date for the hearing of the
case. Before the date of the trial the public prosecutor or his investigator will file in court a list of
witnesses which the prosecution desires to call at the trial. On receipt of such list the magistrate
will cause to be issued under his hand witness summonses for service to be effected on the
witnesses by police (see s. 142 CPA).
The witness summons contains the name of the court issuing it, the place of trial, the case number,
the name of the parties to the case, the name and address of the witness and the date and time of
the trial. In some cases a court officer may serve the summonses 67.
Normally the strength or weakness of the prosecution or defense case depends on the kind of
testimonies adduced by either side. It is necessary therefore those testimonies of relevant witness
should be procured. This is normally done by either procuring the attendance of witness to testify
in court or documentation witnesses attendance may be procured in different ways, namely;
• The party who would like the service of such a witness asking him to court on a
specified date ( this is without summons) ;
• By court issuing witness summons under section 142 (CPA)
• By a court issuing a warrant of arrest to a witness who is likely not to appear if a
mere summons was issued section 143 & 144 (CPA)
• By a court issuing an order to produce a person who is in custody for the purpose of
examination under section 146 or 390 (1) CPA
➢ In the event where a person has been summoned as witness fail to appear without any
lawful cause or having attended, departs without having obtained the permission of the
court or fails to attend after adjournment of the court after being ordered to attend, shall be
liable by order of the court to a fine not exceeding five hundred shillings and such fine shall
be levied by attachment and sale of any movable property of the witness as per Section
147(1),(2)(3) & (4) of CPA.
67Chipeta, B.D. Manual for Public Prosecutors
52
NB. As per section 127(1) of TEA any person is competent to testify, therefore any person may be
summoned as a witness though the law of evidence enacts some qualifications as to their
competence and compellability. Generally all categories of witness are competent and compellable
except:-
• Children of tender ages: below the age of 14 years they are competent witness but their
testimonies may only be received if the court is satisfied through a voire dire68 that they
know the nature of an oath (the duty to tell the truth) and further that such testimonies are
corroborated as per section 127(2) of TEA.
• Wife and husband; spouses are competent but not compellable witness against each other
unless either of them opts voluntarily to give evidence against each other. Section 130 of
TEA, However they may become competent and compellable witness if among other thing
a husband or wife charged with an offence under Chapter XV of the Penal Code or against
section 164 of the Penal Code.
• Advocates, their interpreters and servants: though competent but cannot give evidence
against their clients because of the rule of confidentiality as per section 134 and 135 of
TEA.
• The mentally unfit, old age, tender years and disease of body or mind may vitiate one’s
mental ability much as to fail him to understand the questions put to him and give rational
answers to them. Such people are competent but not compellable witness .
➢ As it was held in the case of Jacob Tibifunga v R 69 “ a trial magistrate had the discretion
to refuse and of course give reasons for refusing, to call a (defense) witness where such
witness’s evidence has no bearing upon the case. Whether or not a person should testify
as a witness will normally depend on the discretion of the court as to the relevancy of his
testimony when tendered.
68
See the recent decision of court of appeal on voire dire in the case Kimbute Otiniel V. Republic Criminal
Appeal No. 300 of 2011.
69
[1982]TLR 125
53
▪ Mode of examination of witness (Section 146 (1), (2) & (3) of Evidence Act and Section
195 (1) & (2) of Cap. 20).
There are three stages in the examination of witness these are examination- in- chief, cross
examination and where necessary, re-examination. Examination in chief is conducted by the
person calling witness usually the public prosecutor; cross examination is done by the opposite
party, that is the accused or his advocate; and re- examination is done by the party calling the
witness70.
▪ Examination in chief (S. 146 (1) of TEA)
The party calling the witness does this type of examination. Usually the public prosecutor does
this in order to extract from his witness, subject to rules of evidence and procedure, everything
known to the specified witness so as to advance the party’s case. The public prosecutor must adhere
to the rules of procedure and evidence for example he is not allowed to ask leading questions on
matters that are clearly material or cross examine his witness unless such witness has turned
hostile.
▪ Cross Examination(S. 146(2) of TEA)
This is done by the opponent party the accused or his advocate mainly with two intentions in the
first place for the purpose of discrediting or disapproving the witness’s story in order to neutralize
or weaken the witness’s evidence in chief by asking questions tending to show that the witness has
a poor memory, is biased or exaggerating the story or an out liar.
Secondly the purpose of building up the case of the cross examiner, this is done by extracting from
the witness facts which are favorable to the case of the cross examiner. Those being the purposes
of cross examination the accused or his advocate is not bound to cross examine a witness.
Therefore the court cannot force a party to cross examine a witness after examination–in-chief.
▪ Re-examination (S.146 (3) of TEA).
This is done by the party calling the witness. Since the purpose of cross examination is to discredit,
to weaken or to destroy the effect of the evidence given in examination-in-chief or to extract from
70 Section 146(1) (2) and (3) of Evidence Act [Cap 6 R.E 2002]
54
the witness matters favorable to the party cross-examining, the purpose of re-examination is to
repair the damage caused to the evidence of the witness by the cross-examination. Sarkar states “
The object of re-examination is to give an opportunity to reconcile the discrepancies ,if any,
between the statements in examination –in-chief and cross examination or to remove any
ambiguity in the deposition or suspicion cast on the evidence by cross examination. The right to
re-examination, needless to say, only arises when there has been cross examination.
TOPIC TWELVE: PROSECUTION CASE, RULING OF PREMAFACIE CASE &

DEFENSE CASE
❖ TRIAL
In law, a trial is when parties to a dispute come together to present information ( in the form
of evidence) in a tribunal, a formal setting with the authority to adjudicate claims or disputes.
Since the burden of proof lies on the prosecution case, therefore they will be the first to open
hearing or hearing and the standard of proving their case is beyond reasonable doubt.
▪ Opening of prosecution case
In the high court, the advocate for the prosecution shall open the case against the accused person
and shall call witnesses and adduce evidence in support of the charge as per section 288 of CPA.
Further the provision of section 289 limit the prosecution side to add additional witness whose
statement or substance of evidence was not read at committal proceedings unless the prosecution
has given a reasonable notice in writing to the accused person or his advocate of the intention to
call such witness. Such notice shall state the name and address of the witness and the substance of
the evidence which he intends to give. The court shall determine what notice is reasonable, regard
being had to the time when and the circumstances under which the prosecution became acquainted
with the nature of the witness's evidence and determined to call him as a witness; but no such
notice need be given if the prosecution first became aware of the evidence which the witness would
give on the date on which he is called, (Section 289 (1), (2), & (3) of CPA).
The prosecution case will be closed subject to the provision of section 293 of the CPA.
55
❖ RULING/PRIMA FACIE CASE (Case to answer or no case to answer).
• On hearing the evidence in support of the charge and such summing up, submission or
argument as may be put forward, summing up and submissions by the prosecutor and
defense respectively. After which the court shall consider whether or not a prima facie case
has been established. If it appears to the court that a case is made out against the accused
person sufficiently it will require him to make a defense in respect to the provision of
section 231 of CPA. Bhatt v R71, where the court defined a prima facie case as one where
a reasonable court directing its mind to the law and evidence would convict if not
explanation were offered by the defense.
• Where the court is of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to establish a prima face
case; then a detailed reasoned ruling will be written leading to an acquittal under Section
230 (1) of the CPA and the accused shall be set at liberty accordingly.
❖ DEFENCE CASE
• At the close of the evidence in support of the charge, if it appears to the court that a case is
made against the accused person sufficiently to require him to make a defense either in
relation to the offence with which he is charged or in relation to any other offence of which,
under the provisions of sections 300 to 309 of the CPA, he is liable to be convicted, as per
section 231(1) of the CPA.
• The accused shall commence his defense by calling his witnesses referred to as defense
Witnesses (DW). The practice is for the accused where he has elected to give evidence
whether sworn or unsworn first, (See Section 231(1) (a) & (b) of the CPA. In the event
where the accused person elects to give evidence not on oath or affirmation, he shall be
subject to cross-examination by the prosecution as per section 231 (2) of the law.
• This procedure ensures that the accused person who must be present throughout the trial
does not have the advantage of listening to his witnesses and thereby probably tailoring his
own evidence to corroborate such witness statements.
• In the event also where the accused elects to remain silent the court shall be entitled to
draw an adverse inference against him and the court as well as the prosecution shall be
71[1957] EA 332
56
permitted to comment on the failure by the accused to give evidence, as provided under
section 231 (3) of CPA. Also in the event where if the accused person states that he has
witnesses to call but that they are not present in court, and the court is satisfied that the
absence of such witnesses is not due to any fault or neglect of the accused person and that
there is likelihood that they could, if present, give material evidence on behalf of the
accused person, the court may adjourn the trial and issue process or take other steps to
compel attendance of such witnesses, as provided under section 231(4) of the said law.
• The accused shall then call witnesses who shall be sworn or affirmed and shall give their
evidence in chief, be cross examined by the prosecutor and re-examined by the defense and
finally they may be examined by the court.
• The weakness is that most accused persons are unrepresented and don’t know what to do,
they may be led by the court if they are unable. The other challenge is if an accused is
unrepresented they lead themselves and are cross-examined but they cannot re-examine
themselves, the ideal will be for court to re-examine them for clarification.
• After calling all the witnesses the defense shall signify to the court the close of their case.
Both the defense and the prosecution may then address the court as per section 233 of the
CPA. The procedure is like during the examination. The argument will be to support each
side’s position. After the close of the defense case the accused or his advocate have the
being the address to the court; with the prosecutor having an automatic right of reply where
the accused has adduced evidence (calling witnesses other than himself).
• After listening to the arguments from both sides the court will proceed to write the
judgment. At the ruling stage the ruling can amount to an acquittal in the same way that a
judgment can amount to an account where the court has established there is no prima facie
case.
• Procedures for defense case in the high court are enumerated under section 294 of the CPA,
and defense case starts as soon as the prosecution has closed their case under section 293
of the said law.
57
TOPIC THIRTEEN : CONVICTION AND SENTENCING
▪ Conviction
Shaving found the accused guilty of the offence charged the appropriate conviction must be passed
accordingly as the general principle states. However there are certain exceptions to the general rule
that the accused cannot be convicted for offences not charged as per section 300-309 of CPA.
The law allows conviction for both minor and cognate offence even though the charge was for
serious offence based on the fact that the minor offence had all necessary elements covered by the
serious charged offence.
The accused must at all-time be said to have known and understood the charge he is facing, for it
is illegal to convict a person of an offence the facts of which have not been told to him and given
an opportunity to defend himself against such allegations.
The court, having heard both the complainant and the accused person and their witnesses and the
evidence, shall convict the accused and pass sentence upon or make an order against him according
to law or shall acquit him or shall dismiss the charge under section 38 of the Cap.16 Penal Code,
(Section 235 (1) of CPA).
▪ Sentencing
Refers to the punishment that courts impose after convicting an accused person, in all respect
sentences is supposed to be in form of punishment. According to Black Law Dictionary, sentence
is defined to mean punishment imposed on a criminal wrongdoer.
In other word sentence is a punishment given by the court to the accused person after being found
guilty and such punishment can take different forms, that is a form of actual punishment or
psychological suffering to the accused, a form of deterrent to the accused person in particular and
to the society in general, a form of measure to protect the interest of the society.
Since there is no standard form of punishment, it is the duty of the magistrate to impose a
punishment which fit the crime committed by the accused.
58
▪ Purposes of sentence
The purpose of criminal justice is to punish the guilty. That is why almost all penal statutes also
prescribe penalties for offences which such a statute creates. What is then, are the purpose of
punishment. We all know them: as stated in Salmond on Jurisprudence on page 115: “….The ends
of criminal justice are four in number and in respect of the purposes so served by it , punishment
may be distinguished as (1) Deterrent, (2) Preventive, (3) Reformative, and (4) Retributive. Of
these the first is the essential and all-important one, the others being merely accessory….”
▪ Deterrent
Punishment is deterrent in the sense that it may serve as a warning to those who might have similar
mind with the convicted person.
▪ Preventing
Punishment is preventive in the sense that the convict is prevented, for instance in his incarceration,
from committing other crimes during such period of his incarceration, and his absence from the
society has the effect of putting the mind of the general public at rest & peace. Incarceration means
putting somebody in imprisonment.
▪ Reformative
Reformative come from the word “Reform” which means turning back into a proper direction.
Punishment is reformative in the sense that by such punishment the convicted person may realize
that there is nothing to be gained in pursuing with criminality and therefore it is much better for
him or her to turns over new directions.
▪ Retributive
Retributive means severe punishments. Punishment is retributive in the sense that it tends to satisfy
our human desires from revenge. Or in other word some people prefer to put into effect that “an
eye for eye and a tooth for tooth” so through retributive human desires for revenge are being
satisfied.
59
▪ Matters to be considered in assessing sentence
In principal, the question of sentencing must not be approached mechanically or perfunctorily. It

involves a careful balancing of many considerations. One of the most important considerations is
that the sentence must serve the public interest. However these paramount considerations must go
hand in hand with a number of other considerations. This consideration includes but not limited to
the followings:
➢ Gravity of the offence
The gravity of an offence is one of the important considerations in assessing sentences. The gravity
of an offence is usually indicated by the penalty provisions of the particular offence. So statutes
usually provide for the maximum punishment for a give offence and so the courts can impose
punishment only to such maximum.
➢ Prevalence of the offence
Another obvious factor to be taken into consideration in assessing sentence of the prevalence of
the offence within the jurisdiction of the court or of the country generally, where the is evidence
that the particular type of offence is very prevalent within the court’s jurisdiction, and all things
being equal, a court would be justified in imposing stiff sentences for such offences.
➢ How much damage was caused?
The damage caused (or in the case of attempt or inchoate crimes, which would have been caused)
by commission of the offence, often has a direct relevance to the gravity of the offence.
➢ The offender’s antecedents
This is of great relevance to assessment of sentences is the offender’s antecedents, that is his
background prior to committing the offence of which he has just been convicted. A sentencing
magistrate must look into offender’s antecedents. He must find out whether the accused has had a
stable or turbulent upbringing, whether he is a first offender or has a previous criminal history.
60
➢ Age of accused and clean record
The generally accepted view is that young first offenders, all things being equal, should be treated
relatively leniently. The rationale for this is that youthful first offenders are usually susceptible to
reformative influence. In the case of Hattan V R 72, George, C.J., (as then he was) made this point
when he said as follows: “…Whenever a first offender is concerned the emphasis should always
be on the reformative aspect of punishment unless the offence is one of such a serious nature that
an exemplary punishment is required, or unless the offence is so wide spread that severe
punishment is needed as a shock of deterrent…”
Similarly, where an accused is an old man and the first offender, this is too should be taken as a
mitigating factor as explained in the case of R v Mitimingi kaganda73.
➢ For how long has he been in custody?
To remand a man in custody is, of course not the same thing as sentencing him to imprisonment.
However remanding a man in custody involves some curtailment of his liberty to do whatever he
likes. It is, therefore only proper that such period as an offender has spent in remand custody be
taken into account in assessing his sentence.
➢ Temptation
Court sometimes takes into consideration the circumstances in which the offender found himself
in committing a particular crime, and temptation has sometimes been taken as a mitigating factor.
In the words of the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa in the case of Hopley v R 74, where it was
stated that “…There is a different in the decree of criminality between a person who his own
volition commits an offence and one who, in the face of great temptation which he hasn’t himself
brought about, succumbs to it…”
72[1969] HCD NO 234

73
[1973] LRT NO 17
74
[1964] 16 E.AC.A. 110, on page 111
61
▪ Procedure in sentencing
A. In Mitigation
When the trial has resulted into a conviction and the judgment has been duly delivered in open
court, the magistrate will ask the public prosecutor if the accused has any previous record, he is
said to be a first offender. If that is the case, the magistrate will ask the accused to say anything in
mitigation of sentence, that is to say something which the court may consider as justifying
leniency. In mitigation, the accused is expected to tell the court such matters as his family
commitments, how long (if at all) he has been in custody, his poor health, (if he is honest enough)
what drove him to commit offence, his age, his education, his occupation, just to mention a few.
After mitigation, the magistrate may (and usually should) should ask the accused any question
pertaining to the accused’s antecedents. This is called “Allocutus”. Allocutus is intended to enable
the magistrate to elicit more information about the accused so as to arrive at an appropriate mode
and severity of the sentence to be imposed.
It is essential that the accused must be heard in mitigation and also to contradict, if he can, the
previous record or other facts stated by the prosecution regarding him. On this point, it should be
pointed out that it isn’t every accused person who knows what he has say “in mitigation”. You
will, therefore, come across accused persons who on you’re asking them to address you in
mitigation, will go back and repeat their defense to the charge. In such an event it is necessary that
you should ask him specific questions such as his background, his education, occupation, family
problems. It is for this reason that “allocutus” is important.
The High Court of Tanzania stressed this point in the case of R v Suleimaini Said & Another75,
in which Kisanga. J. (as then he was) said, “…Allocutus is an important right of an accused person
and magistrates should always ensure that the accused person is given opportunity to exercise it
because he may have something to say which could influence the magistrate to exercise direction
in his favor…”
75
[1977] LRT No. 29
62
B. Procedure in case of previous conviction (Section 278 of the CPA)
If the prosecution says that the accused has a record of previous convictions, the prosecutor may
either state orally the particulars of such convictions that are the offences, sentences, the sentencing
courts, and dates. But usually the public prosecutor will produce a copy of such previous
convictions.
Thereafter the accused will be asked if he admits such a record. If he admits the record, the record
will be taken to be true and correct. If however the accused denies such record, then it is the duty
of prosecution to adduce evidence to prove its authenticity or correctness on oath or affirmation.
This was stressed in the Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa in the case of Gulam Hussein V. R 76,
in which the Court stated, “…It is improper for a prosecutor after conviction and before sentence
to make any statement to the court against the convict which if challenged he would be unable to
prove by legally admissible evidence…It seems to us that on a controversy as to the facts upon
which sentence is to be based the same rules as to legal proof as in the substantive trial of the
offence must apply…”
In other words, the accused must be given an opportunity to contradict such evidence. When such
evidence has been received, it is the duty of the magistrate to make a finding as to whether or not
he finds such record of previous convictions proved. If he finds it proved, he is entitled to take it
into account in assessing the sentence. If he finds that it hasn’t been proved, he will ignore it. In
the words of Georges, C. J., in the case of Rashidi s/o Ally v. R77, “… When the accused person
denies a conviction appearing on his record, it is necessary to call someone who has present at
the conviction. Entries may be made in files in error, and since previous convictions affect the
severity of sentence…they must be strictly proved. Where they aren’t strictly proved they can’t be
taken into account in sentencing…”
▪ Types of Sentences
There are several categories of sentences and related orders that the court may pass or make on a
convicted person. This includes the following:-
76E.A.C.A. 167
77[1967] HCD No. 215
63
• Death Penalty as per section 25(1) of the Penal Code.

• Imprisonment as per section 25(2) of the Penal Code.
• Corporal punishment as per section 25(3) of the Penal Code.
• Fine as per section 25(4) of the Penal Code.
• Absolute discharge as per section 38 of the Penal Code.
• Costs as per section 32 of the Penal Code.
• Conditional discharge as per section 38 of the Penal Code.
• Probation under the Probation Offenders Act.
• Police supervision as per section 341 of the CPA.
• Restitution as per section 357 of the CPA
▪ Concurrent & Consecutive Sentences
Generally the accused person may be charged in several counts in a single trial. Normally these
counts they have different sentences for example it is theft and housebreaking, so each offence
will have its sentence. So there are two modes of running those sentences namely as follows:
Concurrently and Consecutively.
➢ Concurrently Sentence
Concurrently, simply means the same cause of action. Concurrently sentences run where the
offences charged are founded on the same facts or from series of offences of the same or similar
character. This has been explained in the case of John Ngarama v. R78, accused was convicted
on two counts of stealing, both arising out of the same transaction (taking money belonging to two
people from a single purse.) The Magistrate’s judgment stated that he was convicted “as charged”
and sentenced to 9 months’ imprisonment. It was held that where an accused is convicted on two
or more counts, the sentence given must been allocated among the various counts, or to a particular
count, sentence of 9 months on each count imposed to run concurrently.
78
[1967] HCD No. 264
64
➢ Consecutive Sentence (cumulative sentence)
This happens when the offence doesn’t run concurrently. This occurs to an offence which doesn’t
fall under the same transaction. This has explained in the case of R v Lucas Katingisha79, accused
was charged in two separate counts of using a bicycle without a license and of using a bicycle
without affective brakes. He pleaded guilty and was fined Shs. 10/. It was held that, when there is
more than one count, each must be dealt with separately by the court, rather than passing one
omnibus sentence. Sentence was altered to a fine of Shs. 5/ on each of the two counts.
TOPIC FOURTEEN: COMMITAL PROCEDINGS
Committal Proceeding is statutorily defined as; proceedings held by a subordinate court with a
view to the committal of an accused person to the High Court 80. Under the Tanzania Criminal
Procedure committal proceeding is conducted, when the charge has been brought against the
person for the offence not triable by the subordinate court or as to which the court is advised by
the Director of Public Prosecutions in writing or otherwise that it is not suitable to be disposed of
upon summary trial81.
• Committal proceeding is mandatory when the law provides so. In cases of murder for
example, an accused person cannot appear before a Judge for trial unless the P.I is
conducted even if he pleads guilty, this was so said in R v Asafu Tumwine82, the court of
appeal in this case gave a ruling that the High Court has no jurisdiction over a matter that
was supposed to be subjected to Committal Proceeding and it was not.
▪ RATIONALE BEHIND COMMITAL PROCEEDINGS
The rationale behind committal proceeding is inter alia to:-
• Theprimary rationale of committals was and still is to ensurethat an accused did/does not
face trial on a serious criminal matter without sufficient evidence being garnered in
advance.
79
[1967] HCD No. 263
80
81
Ibid Section 244
82
Criminal Revision no. 1 of 2006 (CAT) (Un-reported)
65
• Treat the accused justly, such that the accused is arraigned on justifiable grounds.
• Secondly is to save time as to decrease backlog of cases in the courts and
• To assure that evidence garnered is reasonably sufficient to establish the alleged offence.
➢ An attempt to argue on the importance of the committal proceeding was made by the
Tanzania High Court in a notorious case in this discipline of study thus; Brown Joseph
Undule & 5 Others V. R 83, Briefly in this case the application to the High Court was
brought forth to ascertain whether a magistrate conducting committal proceeding may grant
bail in bailable offences even though they do not have powers to try the offences charged,
the magistrate was hesitant to do that hence refrained to avail the same. Mihayo J (as he
then was) answered this to the affirmative and hitherto discussed the overall significance
of committal proceeding holding that the principal purpose of committal proceeding and
examination in the P.I is to ensure that an accused will not be brought to trial unless a prima
facie case is shown.
❖ Procedures in conducting committal proceedings
In the first Schedule to the Criminal Procedure Act 1985, the offences triable by subordinate courts
and those triable exclusively by the High Court are provided for. Consequently, subordinate Courts
cannot determine cases indictable exclusively by the High court. In such cases a magistrate has to
conduct what is referred to as “Preliminary Inquiry” in the case and then commit the accused to
the High Court for trial.
Justice Chipeta (as he then was) 84, has given a guideline on how a magistrate should statutorily
conduct a committal proceeding, his guideline is as follows;
• Firstly, the Magistrate has to read over, or cause to be read over, and explain the charge to
the accused in the language he/she understands, and he should strictly
not be asked to plead thereto. The Magistrate duty at this stage is to let the accused perso
n to know why he/she has been brought to court. To do that a magistrate may address to
the accused the following words. “This is not your trial. If it is so decided you will be tried
83
Misc. Criminal Application No. 34 of 2008, High Court of Dar es Salaam (unreported)
84MagistrateManual, T M P Tabora Publishers, 1989 at pg 153.
66
later in the High Court, and the evidence against you will be then adduce. At the High
Court you will be able to call your witness in making your defense”.
• Under Section 245(1) (2) & (3) the Criminal Procedure Act the Magistrate can thereafter
remand the accused person or release him on bail if the offence is bailable.
• Secondly, after the investigation is completed the police officer or any other public officer
in charge of the investigation will cause the statement of the proposed witnesses in five
copies to be printed out, then compiled and sent along with
the police case file, to the Director of Public Prosecution or some other officer designated
by him.
• Vide the CPA 85, if the D.P.P or such other delegate decides that the evidence justifies
putting the accused on trial, he should proceed to draw an information, duly sign it and
submit it, together with three copies of each of the statement of
the proposed witnesses, to the Registrar or District Registrar of the High Court who will
send the copy to the District Court where the accused was first presented.
• Thirdly, upon receiving the copy, the district court will summon the accused person and
read to him in court the information as well as the statements of the proposed witness to be
called at the trial. After summoning the accused person in court the district court has to tell
the accused the statement as this: “You have now heard the substance of the evidence that
the prosecution intends to call at your trial. You may either reserve your defence, which
you are at option to do, or say anything which is relevant to the charge against you.
Anything you say will be recorded and may used in evidence at your trial”.
• At this stage before the accused person says anything the Magistrate must warn him that
he/she has nothing to hope from any promise of favor and nothing to fear from any threat
which may have been held out to him to make any admission or confession of his guilt.
• According to the C.P.A under section 246(1)(2)(3) and (4), After the Magistrate has given
the warning he must tell the accused that given that warning any statement he/she will
make may be taken in evidence at his trial regardless of any such threat or promises.
• Lastly, the Magistrate draws the list of the witnesses, including those the accused desires
to call. The Magistrate will then commit the accused to the High Court for trial. In doing
85Section 245 (4) (5) (6) and (7) of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]
67
so the Magistrate may use the word as: “I hereby commit the accused person to the High
Court for trial at the next sessions.”
• The accused person is entitled to free copy of the charge, copy of the
statement produced to the court during the committal proceedings, and the record of proc
eedings, before the court. Finally the accused can then be remanded in custody or have his
bail extended incase of bailable offences. The records are then carefully compiled and
transmitted to the Registrar of the respective High Court for necessary actions.
▪ Weaknesses of Committal proceeding
➢ The purposes of the committal proceedings are in practice often more theoretical than
realistic.
➢ Committal Proceeding in Tanzania as a matter of fact takes too long to be culminated.
➢ It is likely that the committal process adds considerably to both cost and delay in the
processing of criminal cases. The committal process adds significant cost and delay, tying
up resources that could be better used elsewhere, such that the time of the court is held in
entertaining incomplete case which should be the work of the police.
68
TOPIC FIFTEEN: QUESTIONS & ANSWERS, AS WELL AS RELATED NOTES FOR

FURTHER REFLECTION86
Question: What is a Composition of High Court when trying treason trial?
The composition of a High Court when trying a treason trial is a single Judge sitting with 2
assessors. See Salum A. Kinongile vs. Republic [1992] TLR 349 pg. 351.
Question: What is the Composition of High Court when trying Homicide Cases in Tanzania?
The composition of High Court when trying Homicide Cases in Tanzania is single Judge sitting at
least with 2 assessors. See Section 265 of Criminal Procedure Act Cap. 20 of [R.E 2002].
Question: What is a Composition of High Court when hearing defamation case under
Newspaper Act.
The composition of High Court when hearing a defamation case under News paper Act is a single
Judge sitting with at least 2 assessors. Check Newspaper Act Act. 1976 Cap 229 [R.E 2002].
Part VI section 38 to 47
Question: What is accelerated trial?
An accelerated trial is provided under section 192 of the Criminal Procedure Act. 185 Cap.20
[R.E 2002]. It has some meaning as preliminary hearing by definition; accelerated trial means a
procedure in criminal cases in which the court determines matters which are not in dispute as
between the parties.
N.B. The purpose of accelerated trial is to speed up the criminal trials.
Question: What are cases where the Courts sit with assessors?
Primary Courts – Magistrates in Primary Court. Court in Civil and Criminal Cases, that is, Primary
Court Magistrate is required in Law to sit with assessors in all civil and criminal cases see section
7 of Magistrate Court Act 1984 Cap. 11 [R.E 2002.
High Court: high court judges are required to sit with assessors in the following cases;
86Bar questions and answers by Hezron, S
69
I) Homicide
II) Treason
III) Defamation
IV) Economic crime
Question: Name different sentences that can be given to a person convicted of criminal
offence.
Generally speaking, the type of punishment/sentence to be given to a person convicted of criminal

offence in any case is determined by penalty provisions Example: Penal Code Cap. 16. As far as
the Subordinate Court are concerned provides the following type of punishment/sentences:-
*Death;RMwithextendedjurisdiction
*imprisonment;
*Corporal punishment;
*Fine;
*Forfeiture;
*Payment of Compensation;
*Order of finding security to keep peace and be good of behavior;
*Probation;
*Costs as per section 345 of Criminal Procedure Act. Cap 20;
*Police supervision
Notes: -The court may impose sentence other than that provided by statute see section 27(3) of the
Penal Code Cap 16 that is a person liable to imprisonment may be summoned to pay fine instead
of imprisonment.
The courts Power to sentence is provided by section 170 of The Criminal Procedure Act Cap.
20. Also the Court’s power to impose Corporal punishment is limited by provisions of the
Corporal Punishment Act, Cap 17.
Question: How Residents Magistrates’ Court hears the Organized Crime Offences?
70
Generally offences under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, 1984 Cap 200 are
tried by the High Court after the DPP Consents to be tried. However Courts subordinate to the
High Court may hear Organized Crime offences if two things are done; thus:
i). DPP like in the High Court must give consent for prosecution of organized crime case
per section 26 of Act No. 13 of 1984.
ii). DPP must issue certificate conferring jurisdiction to RMs’ Court to try Organized
Crimes case as per section 12(3A) of Act No. 13 of 1984 as amended.
N.B Generally the jurisdiction to hear and determine economic crime cases is vested in high Court
of Tanzania. See section 3(1) of Act No. 13 of 1984. The court sits as Economic Crimes Court per
section 3(2) of the same Act. The constitution of the Economic Crimes Court is judge of the High
Court and two lay members. See section 4 of the Act.
Notice: section 26 of the Economic and organized Crime Control Act, 1984 provides for the
requirements of DPP consent before instituting criminal trials in respect of criminal offences.
Section 26(2) of the same Act empowers DPP by NOTICE published in the Gazette to delegate
some of his powers in this referred to State Attorney by specifying Economic offences which
require his personal consent and those that can be consented by some State Attorney. By
Government Notice No. 191/1984 the DPP reserved to his own consent the prosecution of offences
specified in Part 1 of the Schedule to the Notice and delegated to State Attorney in-charge of the
Zone or Region in which the Organized offence took place. The power to consent to prosecution
of offences specified under Part 11 of the Schedule to the Notice. Examples are offences under
The Wildlife Conservation Act do fall under the Schedule to Government Notice No. 191/1984.
Question: What Court will do under the following circumstances;
a). witness take oath but refuses to give evidence.
b). Accused refuses to plea.
C). Accused retracts or repudiates his confession.
The witness who takes oaths but refuses to give evidence is known as refractory witness. If a
witness having been sworn or affirmed refuses to answer any questions put on him the court will
71
adjourn’ the case for a period of not more than eight days, and may in meantime commit such
person to prison, unless he soon consents to do what he is require of him see section 199(1) of
Criminal Procedure Act Cap 20. Be it noted that, the court will do so if the witness offers no
sufficient excuse. Against if after adjournment, the witness continuous to refuse to answer
questions put to him the case will be adjourned for a period not exceeding eight days and the
witness will be committed to prison as per section 199(2) of the CPA. Alternatively the court may
commit such witness for contempt of court under section 114(b) of Penal Code and be liable on
conviction to imprisonment for six months or a fine not exceeding (500/=) five hundred shillings.
Further discussion:- Other circumstances falling under refractory witness are in section 199 of the
CPA and these are:
i). Where a witness refuses to be sworn or affirmed; or ii). Where a witness refuses or
neglects to produce any documents or things which he is required to produce, or
iii). Where witness refuses to sign his depositions. Also what writ could be applied in (i)
to (iii) above, refer the above discussion i.e. section 199(1) of the CPA and section 199(2)
of the same will apply or alternatively section 114(b) of the Penal Code may apply.
(b). If the witness refuses the plea section 228(4) CPA, 1985 will apply. The section provides that
if the accused person refuses to plead, the court is required to enter a plea of no guilty. However,
before entering a plea of what guilty under section 228(4) of CPA the Court is required to hold an
inquiry into accused’s refusal to plea or muteness in order to satisfy itself whether the accused
stands mute out of malice or through the visitation of God. If it is found that the accused stands
mute out of malice or refuse to plea, the Magistrate will enter a plea of not guilty’ and proceed to
try the charge. But where the accused does not plea to a charge or stands mute by the visitation of
God, say, if he is deaf and dumb or is suffering from some decease of the mind or is so deaf that
he cannot hear when the charge is read over to him such an accused person can, if he is sane, be
tried if he can read or write or if intelligence can be conveyed to him by signs or symbols. See A
Magistrates Manual by Justice Chipeta, page 32.
(C). if the accused retracts or repudiates his confession the court is required to ascertain its
reliability and, or seek corroboration.; the court of Appeal of Tanzania in Shihobe Seni & Another
72
vs. Republic [1992] TLR 330 said that where confessions are repudiated then there is a need for
ascertain their reliability and or seek corroboration.
But how ascertaining reliability of repudiated or retracted confession can be done? It may be
done by holding an inquiry for subordinate and trial within trial for high court.
And how can evidence corroborating repudiated or retracted confession can be sought?
*The Court may seek the evidence corroborating repudiated or retracting confession by ordering
the prosecution to call witness corroborating repudiated or retracted confession.
Question: Who are excluded when High Court conduct trial within trial?
When the High Court conducts trial within a trial assessors are excluded.
(ii). Why assessors are excluded when the High court conducts trial within trial?
Trial within trial involves only matters on point of matter of Law. It does not involve matters on
point of fact that is why assessors are excluded when High Court conducts trial within trial. It
would appeal also that assessors are excluded when High Court conducts trial within trial because
the same may influence assessors’ opinion at the inclusion of hearing the main case.
Question: What Court should do when the convict of murder is pregnant woman?
Section 197 of the Penal Code Cap 16 provide for the punishment of murder that is, death
sentence. The proviso to section 26(1) of Penal Code exonerates the pregnant woman who is
a convict of murder from death sentence. The Provision to the proviso to section 26(1) in the
Penal Code provides that, where the Court is satisfied that the woman convicted of an offence
punishable with death is pregnant such court shall pass on her a sentence of imprisonment for life
instead of a sentence of death.
Question: Explain the following:
(a). Suspended sentence
(b). Omnibus sentence
73
a). Suspended sentence as per section 25(g) of the Penal Code is that mode of punishment that
resembles that of conditional discharge. It arises in a case where an accused person is convicted
of an offence other than that specified in Schedule VI in the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972 and
no previous conviction is proved against such convicted person. If these two circumstances exist,
the Court may pass a sentence of imprisonment but order that the whole or any part of it suspended
for a period not exceeding 3 years on such conditions, such as costs or compensation be paid by
the offender or otherwise as the court may specify in such order.
b). Omnibus sentence is a single sentence for all offences of which an accused person has been
found guilt in a single trial.
Note: According to Justice Chipeta in Magistrate’s Manual pages 140 to 141, it is wrong to
pass Omnibus sentence where the accused person in convicted on two or more counts in trial
because the sentence must be passed on each count separately.
Question: Who are exempted from death Penalty?
The following convicts are exempted from death penalty:
(i) Pregnant: See proviso to section 26(1) Penal Code.

(ii) A person who in the opinion of the Court is under eighteen years of age as per
provision of section 26(2) of the Penal Code Cap. 16
What is the Certificate of delay?
The Certificate of delay is the certificate of assurance of completeness of record of proceeding

issued by registrar of High Court under the proviso to rule. Section 3(1) of Court Appeal Rules
to a party who wants to appeal against the decision of High Court to Court of Appeal of Tanzania.
Question: What is probation?
Probation orders are governed by the Probation of Offenders Act, Cap 247 of the Revised Law
and Provisions of section 337 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20. Probation order is defined
by section 2 of Cap. 247 to mean probation order made under the provisions of the Ordinance
placing the people under the supervision of a probation officer.
74
Notes: Probation officer is defined under section 2 of Cap 247 to mean probation officer appointed
under the provisions of section 15 of the Cap. 247. Section 3 of the Cap 247 provides that where
a Court after convicting a person of an offence other than the offence specified under the schedule
to the Minimum Sentences Act, 1972, and it is of the opinion that having regard to youth
character, antecedent, home surroundings, health or mental condition of the offender, or the nature
of the offence, or any extenuating circumstances in which the offence was committed, it is
expedient to release the offender on probation, such Court may make probation order at its
discretion.
Section 4(1) of Cap 247 provides that Probation Order must be for a period of not less than one
year and not more than three years.
Question: What is approved School Order?
Approved School Order is an order committing the offender to an Approved School, this mode of
punishment is only available to Children and Young Persons.
Note: section 2 of Children and Young Persons Act, Cap 13 of Revised Laws defines Approval
School.
Question: What is Preliminary Objection?
It is an Objection raised by party to a case or an application on matters of Law or procedure before

the hearing or determination of the main case or the application.
Question: What do you understand by the following terms:
i). Conditional discharge
ii). Concurrent Sentence and Consecutive Sentence.
The difference between the two.
Conditional discharge is governed by provisions of section 38(1) of Penal Code Cap 16. It is a
discharge of person convicted of an offence by the order of the Court subject to the condition that
he commits no offence during such period, not exceeding twelve months of the Order. It is ordered
by the Court if it is of the opinion that having regard to the circumstances including nature of the
75
offence and the character of the offender it is in expedient to inflict punishment and that a Probation
Order is not appropriate.
Note: Simply, it is the Order of the Court discharging a person convicted of an offence subject to
the condition that he commits no offence during such period, not exceeding 12 months of the order.
Absolute discharge is also provided under section 38(1) of the Penal Code. It is Ordered where the
person convicted of an offence is discharged by court order absolutely is without attaching
condition, that he commits no offence during such period no exceeding twelve months of the
Order.
Concurrent sentence means sentences Ordered by the Court to be served together. That is sentences
after the other. Concurrent sentence is ordered by the Court when offences are committed in course
of the same transaction. See words of Love, J., in Republic vs. Kassongo s/o Luhogwa, 2 TLR
(R)) 47.
Note: Sentences of fine must not be ordered to run concurrently. They must always run
consecutively.
Sentence of imprisonment in default of payment of fine must always be ordered to run

consecutively and not concurrently. See Chipeta J. in Magistrate’s Manual, page 143.
Consecutive Sentences means sentences ordered by the Court to run one after the other.
Consecutive Sentence is ordered where offences committed do not form part of the same
transaction. Note also: The difference between concurrent consecutive sentences are discussed in
Elias Joakim vs. Republic 1992 TLR 20 pg. 226.
Question: What is refractory witness?
Refractory witness is governed by provisions of section 199(1) of Criminal Procedure Act.

Refractory witness is the witness who falls under the following cases, namely:
i). A witness who without sufficient excuse refuses to be sworn or affirmed; or
ii). A witness who having been sworn or affirmed refuses to answer any question put to him; or
iii). A person who without sufficient excuse refuses or neglects to produce any document or thing
which he is required by court to produce, or A person who without sufficient excuse refuses to
sign his depositions.
76
AMICUS CURIAE:
Is a Latin Maxim meaning a friend of the court. Is a person who is not a party to a lawsuit but who
petitions the Court or is requested by the Court to file a brief in the action because that person has
strong interest in the subject matter. See Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition.
Question: What are five presumptions of Law?
Five presumptions of Law are; Presumption of innocence sees Article 13(6) (b) of Constitution of
the United Republic of Tanzania. 2). Presumption of sanity see section 12 of Penal Code Cap 20
[R.E 2002] 3). Presumption of marriage as per section 160 of Law of Marriage Act, 1971.
4). Presumption as to property acquired during marriage section 60 Law of Marriage Act, 1971.
5). Presumption as to gift between husband and wife see section 61 of Law of Marriage Act, 1971.
6). Presumption of death as per section 161 of Law of Marriage Act, 1971.
Question: (i) What is Hostile witness?
(ii) What is the value of Evidence of Hostile witness?
i). A hostile witness is the one who by his testimony, conducts, attitude or demeanor appears to be
biased against the party calling him or is unwilling to tell the truth.
A hostile witness is the one who tells lies about what he obviously knows, or who deliberately
changes his earlier story and from his demeanor and bearing he is clearly biased against the party
calling him.
ii). When a witness has been treated as hostile, the evidence of that witness is hardly worthy of
credit. The reason for treating the evidence of a hostile witness as being worth of no credit is that,
such witness is unreliable. In Alowo vs. Republic [1972] E.A.324 the Court of Appeal for East
Africa said that the basis of leave to treat a witness as hostile is that the conflict between the
evidence which the witness is giving and some earlier statements shows him or her to be unreliable
and this makes his or her evidence negligible.
DEFENCE OF ALIBI:- section 194(4),(5) and (6) of Criminal Procedure Act.
77
It refers to the evidence that proves that an accused person was in another place at the time of
commission of an offence and so could not have committed it. In the case of Charles
Samson vs. Republic [1990] TLR 39, the Court of Appeal of Tanzania held that where
the Court does not take cognizance whatsoever of alibi, both in summing up to the assessors
and in the judgment, it amounts to mistrial and a consequential miscarriage of justice.
NOTE: Procedure before accused relies on alibi in his defense:
i). he or she must give a notice to court and prosecution of intention to rely on defense of
alibi before hearing of the case. See section 194(4) of Criminal Procedure Act.
ii). Where notice before hearing of the case of the intention to rely on alibi is not given,
then the accused is required to furnish the prosecution with the particulars of alibi at any
time before the close of prosecution case.
Question: Does the Opinion of Assessors bind judges in murder cases?
). The opinion of assessors does not bind the judge. The judge can disagree with the unanimous
views of the assessors. However, the trial judge is required to give reason for so disagreeing. See
views of judges of Court of Appeal of Tanzania in *Abdalah Bazamiye & others vs. Republic
[1990] TLR 42 pg 45.
ii). What happens if assessors are not given opportunity to put questions to witness:
*Assessors’ full involvement in the trial is an essential part of the process, its omission is fatal,
and renders the trial annullity as per Lordships’ views in Abdallah Bazamiye & Others vs. Republic
[1990] TLR 42
iii). Why the trial is rendered a nullity If the assessors are not given opportunity to put questions?
The duty of assessors is to aid the trial judge in accordance with section 265 of Criminal Procedure
Act and section 177 of the Evidence Act allows the assessors to put questions.
Question: What is a submission of no case to answer?
What effect does it have when raised in a criminal cases?
78
(i). A submission of no case to answer is the submission made by the defending party to a case that
the plaintiff’s or presentation’s case has not been made out sufficiently to require him make the
defense. The effect of raising it in criminal case is that, the court must make a ruling on it and if
the court finds that there is no case to answer, the case will be dismissed and accused acquitted.
But where it is found that there is a case to answer, the accused will be required to make the
defense.
(ii). Can the accused appeal on the ruling for a case to answer?
Yes, the ruling for case to answer is subject to appeal.
(iii). What is the effect of the accused person refuses to make defense when prima a facie case
has been established against him?
Section 231(1) of Criminal Procedure Act provides that the Court is entitled to draw an adverse
inference against the accused person who refuses to make defense when a prima facie case has
been established against him. The section also requires the Court as well as the prosecution to
comment on the failure by the accused to give evidence.
(iv). What do you understand by term in camera?
The term in camera refers to conducting trials without the press or the public being present. E.g.
conducting trial in Judge’s or Magistrate’s private chamber.
Question: Can you tell the powers of DPP and mention under what Law the powers are
found?
The powers of DPP are governed by the provision of section 90(1)(a)-(c) of the Criminal
Procedure Act, also read article 59B of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania,
1977 and section 2 of the Office of the Attorney General Discharge of Duties Act, no. 4/2005
and these are:
(a). To institute and undertake criminal proceedings against any person before any court in respect
of any offence alleged to have been committed by that person;
79
(b). To take over and continue any such criminal proceedings that have been instituted or
undertaken by any other person or authority; and
(c). To discontinue any such criminal proceedings instituted or undertaken by him or any other
authority or person.
Question: What is adjournment sine die?
What happens to the suit adjournment sine die?
Adjournment sine die refers to adjournment of the suit or case or matter without fixing next date
or day in which the same shall come before the court. When the suit is adjourned sine die, it
remains stayed until such time when the order adjourning it sine die is set aside by the court.
Note: Sine die is a latin maxim meaning without date or a day. It is a latin maxim meaning let him
go without a date or day.
Question: What is a diesnon?
Diesnon non (juridicus) means days on which no legal business can be transacted e.g. Sunday and
Friday, Christmas day. |Rule 2 of the Court of Appeal Rules, 1979 defines Dies Non to mean a
Sunday or public holiday and includes any other day or which the Registry is closed.
Question: What do you understand by the term Suo moto?
Suo moto is a latin maxim meaning on its own motion. It is the power of court to determine matters
of legal importance and of which it is required to take its judicial notice without being moved by
the parties to the case.
What happens if the respondent in criminal appeal is dead?
Where the respondent in criminal appeal dies the appeal abates. However, the appeal from a
sentence of fine does abate as per section 371 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Question: What do understand by Burden of proof. What are the standards of proof?
Burden of Proof refers; the duty of a party to litigation to prove a fact or facts in issue. Generally,
the burden of proof falls upon the party who substantially asserts the truth of a particular fact i.e.
80
the prosecution or the Plaintiff as the existence or nonexistence of fact in issue. Also be noted that
there are no absolute standards of proof in both criminal and civil cases but there may be degree
of proof within those standards.
Standard of proof refers the degree of proof required for any fact in issue in litigation which is
established by assessing the evidence relevant to it. Example; in criminal cases the standard is
proof beyond reasonable doubt, whereas, in civil cases, the standard is proof on balance of
probabilities. That is in civil cases the plaintiff discharges his/her burden of proof when he/she
adduces evidence of such a nature that the court can think it to be more probable than not. The
burden doe not shift.
Note: there are two types of burden of proof namely; persuasive/legal burden and evidential
burden.
Persuasive/Legal burden – it is the burden that is carried by the party who as a matter of law will
lose the case if he fails to prove the fact in issue. Evidential Burden – is sometimes referred to as
a burden of adducing evidence that means the duty of showing that there is sufficient evidence to
raise an issue fit for the consideration by court.
Question. (i). Can you tell what do you understand on the following:-
a). trial within trial
Trial within trial refers to a mini trial conducted within a main trial to establish the admissibility
of a disputable piece of evidence which has been challenged by the defense. eg when the
confession retracted/apologized for or repudiated/rejected.
Question: What changes were introduced in the Criminal Procedure Act, 1984 which was
not in the Criminal Procedure Code?
changes introduced by CPA which were not in the Criminal Procedure Code are:
1). CPA empowers Ward Secretary or Secretary Village Council to issue warrant for arrest or
summons requiring the person to appear before the court. See section 13 of CPA.
2). CPA requires the person under restraint to be treated with humanity and with respect of
humanity.
81
3). CPA provides for Preliminary Hearing; as per section 192 of the CPA.
4). CPA provides the right to remain silent to the accused.
5). CPA provides for the Compensation for injuries, loses or death resulting from assisting Police,
Magistrates or any other officer for stopping commission of an offence or in arresting a person
suspected to have committed offence. section 37 of the CPA.
5). CPA empowers the judge to take over and continue the trial commenced by the other. See
section 299 of CPA.
6). CPA allows the accused to give evidence on oath-affirmation or not, but such accused is
subject to cross examination. Provision of section 231(2) of the CPA.
7). CPA provides for requirement of notice before relying on defense of ALIBI; before hearing the
case to furnish particulars of ALIBI; before prosecution a case is closed. See section 194(4) and
(5) of CPA.
8). CPA restricts power of Courts to grant bail. See section 148(5) and DPP certificate refusing
grant of bail.
(ii). If one is aggrieved by a decision of the District Court in Criminal matter what does he
do?
A person aggrieved by a decision of the District Court in Criminal matters can appeal to the High
Court as per section 359(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.
Note: the procedure in appealing to the High Court is governed by section 361 of the Criminal
Procedure. The procedure is; the appellant must give notice of intention to appeal within 10 days
from the date of the findings, sentence or order. And in case of a sentence of a corporal punishment
only, a notice of intention to appeal must be given within 3 days from the date of such sentence;
see section 361(a) of Criminal Procedure Act. And the appellant must lodge his petition of appeal
within forty (45) days from the date of the findings, sentence or order.
Note: Also that the appeal by DPP against acquitted, finding, sentence or order passed by
subordinate court are governed by section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Act, thus;
82
a). DPP must give notice of his intention to appeal with 30 days of the acquittal, finding, sentence
or order against which he wishes to appeal; and b). he must lodge his petition of appeal within
45 days from the date of such acquittal, finding, sentence or order.
What is private prosecution?
Pirate prosecution is governed by the provisions of section 99 of Criminal Procedure Act,

Private prosecution refers to Criminal proceedings instituted and presented by an individual
person.
************************************END*************************************
WABILLAHI TAWFIQ
I may not agree with what you’re saying but I will defend to death you are right to say
what you believe in"
ENGEEENERED
BY
MWAKISIKI, MWAKISIKI, EDWARD
Contacts:
Email: Mwakeyeddy@gmail.com or Mwakeueddy@gmail.com
Phone: +255 678 143 774 or +255 757 119 205
Visit: https://muccobs.academia.edu/MWAKISIKIMWAKISIKI
SN: Tsar Mwakey Eddy.
83

Criminal Procedure Final Ed PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criminal Procedure Final Ed PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Criminal Procedure Final Ed PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MOSHI CO-OPERATIVE UNIVERSITY

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW IN TANZANIA

THEORY AND PRACTICES

BY MWAKISIKI, MWAKISIKI, EDWARD

TOPIC ONE: INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW

▪ Meaning of Criminal Procedure Law

▪ Differences between Criminal law and Criminal Procedure

Criminal Law Criminal Criminal Procedure

1. Substantive Law 1. Remedial/Procedural Law

▪ Sources of criminal procedure

3[1936]3 EACA, pg.29.

TOPIC TWO: COURTS JURISDICTION IN CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE

14Section 316 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]

➢ Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction by subject matter, also termed jurisdiction by categorization of offences is expressly

1620 EACA 310

originating in primary courts, as persons aggrieved by a decision of a district court in the

TOPIC THREE: INVESTIGATIONS

▪ How arrest is made?

▪ Who may effect arrest?

▪ Form, contents and duration of warrant of arrest.

▪ Arrest by Police officer

• Any person who commits a breach of the peace in his presence;

TOPIC FIVE: SEARCH AND SEIZURE

TOPIC SIX: CHARGE SHEET/COMPLAINT/CHARGE

❖ The purpose of a charge sheet

▪ MISQUOTATION OF SECTION NUMBERS

31[1967] HCD NO. 345.

34[1997] TLR 331

36[1968] HCD NO. 312

38 Section 282 of the Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2002]

42[1972] 56 Cr. App. R. 196

▪ Plea of not guilty (Section 279 and 283 of CPA)

▪ Accused standing mute (Section 281 of CPA)

TOPIC EIGHT: BAIL AND BOND

❖ Is Bail a matter of right or privilege?

❖ Bail by Police Officers

53[1971] HCD 391

❖ Breach of Conditions and Revocation of Police Bail

❖ Under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act

❖ Who may apply for bail?

❖ Formalities for the Grant of Bail in Subordinate Courts

❖ Stages in hearing and determination of application for bail

❖ Considerations to be taken into account in bail applications

❖ Whether the applicant is likely to interfere with investigations. If investigations or

❖ Statutory Restrictions to Bail

❖ Bail Pending Appeal, Revision or Confirmation of Sentence.

❖ Bail Pending Revision

❖ Bail Pending Confirmation of Sentence

❖ Consequences of Bail Defaults (Breach of the Conditions of Bail)

❖ On Discovery of an Intention to Escape

TOPIC TEN: PRELIMINARY HEARING (PH)

▪ Meaning of Preliminary Hearing (PH)

▪ Does Preliminary Hearing subject to every case?

▪ Aim of conducting preliminary hearing

▪ Effect of conducting Preliminary Hearing

TOPIC ELEVEN: SUMMONING WITNESS, EXAMINATION OF WITNESS AND

▪ Mode of serving a summons

➢ Mode of serving a summons when service cannot be personally effected