Cooperatives
Cooperatives
Cooperatives
Sigrún
Lilja
Einarsdóttir
Emil
Bjarni
Karlsson
CENTRE
FOR
RETAIL
STUDIES
BIFRÖST
UNIVERSITY
–
DEPARTMENT
OF
LIFELONG
LEARNING
Table
of
Contents
Introduction
........................................................................................................................................
4
1
Module
1:
History,
ideology
and
status
of
the
cooperative
movement
..........................................
5
1.1
Module
description
.........................................................................................................................
5
1.2
Learning
outcomes
.........................................................................................................................
5
1.3
Target
groups
..................................................................................................................................
6
1.4
Module
1
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
......................................................................................
7
1.4.1
What
is
a
cooperative?
............................................................................................................
7
1.4.2
The
origins
of
the
cooperative
movement
–
fulfilling
a
need
..................................................
8
1.4.3
The
first
cooperatives
–
The
Rochdale
Pioneers
......................................................................
9
1.4.4
The
7
Cooperative
Principles
.................................................................................................
10
1.4.5
Different
forms
of
cooperatives
............................................................................................
13
1.4.6
Cooperatives
in
Europe
–
Facts,
figures
and
general
attitudes
.............................................
16
1.4.7
The
cooperative
movement
in
Finland
..................................................................................
17
1.4.8
The
Cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
..................................................................................
19
1.4.9
The
Cooperative
movement
in
Trentino,
Italy
.......................................................................
21
1.4.10
The
cooperative
movement
in
Poland
................................................................................
23
1.4.11
The
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden
...............................................................................
25
1.5
Assignments
and
exercises
...........................................................................................................
27
1.5.1
Surveys
and
questionnaires
...................................................................................................
27
1.5.2
Discussions
.............................................................................................................................
27
1.5.3
Tools
/
Writing
assignments
..................................................................................................
27
2
Module
2:
Being
a
cooperative
member
.......................................................................................
28
2.1
Module
description
.......................................................................................................................
28
2.2
Learning
outcomes
.......................................................................................................................
28
2.3
Target
groups
................................................................................................................................
29
2
2.4
Module
2
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
....................................................................................
29
2.4.1
Being
a
cooperative
member
–
what
does
it
mean?
.............................................................
29
2.4.2
What
do
the
7
principles
of
cooperatives
say
about
cooperative
membership?
..................
30
2.4.3
Being
a
cooperative
member
in
Iceland
................................................................................
31
2.4.4
Becoming
an
active
cooperative
member
.............................................................................
33
2.5
Assignments
and
exercises
...........................................................................................................
34
2.5.1
Surveys
and
questionnaires
...................................................................................................
34
2.5.2
Discussions
.............................................................................................................................
34
2.5.3
Tools
/
Writing
assignments
..................................................................................................
34
3
Module
3:
Establishing
a
new
cooperative
business
.....................................................................
35
3.1
Module
description
.......................................................................................................................
35
3.2
Learning
outcomes
.......................................................................................................................
35
3.3
Target
groups
................................................................................................................................
36
3.4
Module
3
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
....................................................................................
37
3.4.1
Starting
a
cooperative
–
what
do
you
need
to
keep
in
mind?
...............................................
37
3.4.2
Setting
up
a
cooperative
in
7
steps
........................................................................................
38
3.5
Assignments
and
excercises
..........................................................................................................
43
3.5.1
The
Wheel
(and
other
tools
from
Coompanion
Skaraborg)
..................................................
43
3.5.2
Making
a
business
plan
..........................................................................................................
44
4
Further
readings
...........................................................................................................................
45
Useful
websites
......................................................................................................................................
49
3
Introduction
This
study
booklet
is
a
result
of
the
project
Conventus
–
Learning
Model
for
Cooperatives
and
its
aim
is
to
provide
study
material
for
groups
and
individuals
who
aim
at
starting
up
a
new
cooperative
and
also
for
members
of
existing
cooperatives.
This
booklet
is
a
teacher´s
copy
and
includes
descriptions
of
3
different
modules,
learning
outcomes,
suggested
target
groups,
study
material
and
assessment
tools
for
each
module.
The
modules
presented
in
this
study
material
are:
• Module
1
–
History,
ideology
and
status
of
the
cooperative
movement
• Module
2
–
Being
a
cooperative
member
• Module
3
–
Establishing
a
new
cooperative
business
The
Conventus
project
is
also
developing
2
more
modules
(Module
4
–
Managing
a
cooperative
and
Module
5
–
Developing
existing
cooperatives)
and
for
Iceland,
these
modules
will
be
developed
on
a
later
stage
since
the
first
two
modules
fit
the
Icelandic
scenery
at
the
moment.
There
are
very
few
cooperatives
in
Iceland
in
the
present
day,
no
public
debate
existing
on
the
cooperative
form
and
few
experts
in
cooperatives
at
present.
The
study
material
is
designed
from
a
pragmatic
perspective,
aimed
at
individuals
with
a
diverse
background
and
education,
based
on
material
from
partner
countries
in
the
Conventus
project.
Further
description
of
each
module
(module
description,
learning
outcomes,
target
groups,
study
material
and
assessment)
can
be
found
in
each
chapter.
4
1 Module
1:
History,
ideology
and
status
of
the
cooperative
movement
1.1 Module
description
This
module
aims
at
introducing
highlights
of
the
history,
background
and
ideology
of
the
cooperative
movement,
specifically
the
origin
of
the
movement
on
European
level
and
the
history
and
development
on
national
level
in
every
partner
country.
The
aim
is
also
targeted
at
increasing
members’
understanding
on
how
cooperatives
are
a
different
kind
of
business
and
how
to
put
cooperative
principles
and
values
into
action.
This
module
can
be
used
as
an
introductory
part
along
with
one
or
more
of
the
following
modules.
Special
focus
will
be
put
on
creating
cooperative
attitudes.
Cooperative
values
and
principles
are
discussed
and
introduced
with
the
purpose
of
making
cooperative
members,
workers,
managers,
board
members,
co-‐operators
to-‐be
and
other
target
groups
aware
of
the
ideology
of
the
cooperative
thinking
and
how
to
incorporate
this
philosophy
into
their
work
and
everyday
life.
The
status
of
the
cooperative
movement,
both
on
EU/world
level
and
on
national
level
(of
partner
countries)
will
be
introduced
and
finally,
the
general
attitudes
towards
cooperatives
and
the
future
of
the
cooperative
movement
will
be
discussed
and
debated.
1.2 Learning
outcomes
Knowledge
/
attitudes
After
this
module,
student
should
…
• have
acquired
basic
knowledge
of
the
origins
of
the
cooperative
movement
• be
aware
of
the
historical
context
of
the
cooperative
movement
both
EU/worldwide
and
the
historical
development
of
the
cooperative
movement
in
their
home
country
• have
increased
awareness
about
how
cooperatives
are
a
different
kind
of
business
• Evaluate
his/her
own
perceptions
and
perspectives
towards
the
cooperative
ideology
Skills
/
useful
tools
After
this
module,
students
should
…
• Be
able
to
define
a
cooperative
• Be
able
to
incorporate
the
cooperative
ideology
into
their
work
and
everyday
life
5
• Be
able
to
use
the
cooperative
ideology
as
a
guiding
light
in
their
work
/
to
be
active
members
in
the
cooperative
1.3 Target
groups
This
module
can
be
aimed
at
different
target
groups
whereas
it
is
important
for
every
person
associated
with
a
cooperative
to
be
aware
of
the
origins
and
ideology
of
the
cooperative
movement:
• Cooperative
members
• Cooperative
workers
• Cooperative
managers
• Cooperative
board
members
• Employees,
managers
and
board
members
at
cooperative
unions
• Co-‐operators
to-‐be
• Cooperative
trainers
and
advisors
6
1.4 Module
1
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
7
1.4.2 The
origins
of
the
cooperative
movement
–
fulfilling
a
need
Why
were
cooperatives
established
in
the
first
place?
The
overall
aim
of
the
cooperatives
was
to
fight
poverty
and
unstable
working
conditions
of
the
general
public
in
the
latter
part
of
the
19th
Century,
especially
in
Britain
and
France.
In
the
late
18th
Century,
societies
in
Europe
had
undergone
major
societal
changes.
Factories
emerged;
all
the
labour
force
that
used
to
work
in
agriculture
moved
to
the
cities
to
work
in
major
enterprises
where
conditions
were
unstable
and
unsanitary.
Big
growth
of
capital
and
hard
competition
Image
2:
The
industrial
era
in
Great
Britain
–
see
between
industrial
enterprises
caused
cuts
in
https://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwart/ind_rev/imag
workers’
salaries,
which
then
caused
poor
es/indust.html.htm
conditions
of
labour
workers.
Men,
women
and
even
children
had
to
work
for
long
hours
for
low
salaries.
Unemployment
rate
increased
and
there
was
no
job
security
since
no
labour
unions
existed
(no
cooperation
between
labour
workers
against
their
employers).
Due
to
these
poor
conditions,
the
ideology
and
the
model
of
a
cooperative
emerged
from
a
need
–
as
an
answer
to
poverty
and
in
order
to
give
the
public
better
lives.
Poverty
among
farmers
and
the
working
class
was
a
consistent
problem,
particularly
in
rural
areas
where
the
public
had
difficulty
of
accessing
affordable
goods
and
services.
The
major
reasons
of
establishing
cooperatives
were
numerous,
e.g.
to
purchase
in
bulk
to
achieve
lower
prices,
increase
bargaining
power,
share
common
costs
of
new
technology,
add
value
to
agricultural
products
for
farmers,
gain
access
to
new
markets,
obtain
new
services
and
provide
credit
under
reasonable
terms.
The
aim
was
in
a
nutshell
to
achieve
economy
of
size
and
reduce
risks
associated
with
new
enterprise
–
thus
to
create
a
stable
environment
for
the
public
to
access
service
8
and
goods
for
reasonable
prize
and
as
well
for
farmers
and
small
producers
to
get
reasonable
prices
for
their
products
and
the
possibility
to
have
access
to
a
stable
market.3
Trentino
area
in
Northern
Italy
is
an
example
of
an
area
with
strong
cooperative
tradition.
Primarily
in
one
of
the
poorest
areas
in
Italy
in
the
19th
century,
cooperatives
were
established
in
order
to
improve
the
lives
and
living
conditions
of
its
inhabitants.
Now,
cooperatives
play
an
important
role
in
the
economy
of
Trentino
and
employment
rate
is
low
(see
further
in
section
1.4.9).
In
various
countries,
cooperatives
have
been
strongly
associated
with
political
forces.
In
Iceland,
for
example,
the
cooperative
movement
was
associated
with
the
Progressive
party.
The
movement
was
considerably
widespread
throughout
Iceland
in
the
20th
Century,
until
it
collapsed
in
the
1990s.
Since
then,
few
cooperatives
have
survived
and
not
many
have
been
established
(see
further
in
section
0).
According
to
CreditInfo,
31
cooperatives
exist
in
Iceland
at
present
(in
June
2013).
The
general
attitude
towards
cooperatives
in
Iceland
seems
to
be
associated
with
the
old
cooperative
movement
and
is
considered
rather
negative
at
the
moment.
The
Polish
cooperative
movement
is
another
example
where
the
cooperative
movement
in
Poland
has
been
associated
with
communism.
Therefore,
the
general
attitude
as
well
as
government
perspective
is
rather
negative
towards
the
cooperative
form
in
general
(see
further
in
section
1.4.10).
1.4.3 The
first
cooperatives
–
The
Rochdale
Pioneers4
The
first
company
considered
to
use
the
cooperative
ideology
was
founded
in
Fenwick,
East
Ayrshire
in
England
in
1769,
formerly
as
the
Fenwick
Weavers’
Society.
This
cooperative
was
a
consumer
co-‐operative
where
its
aim
was
to
practice
collective
purchasing
for
the
benefit
of
members,
like
bulk
food
items
and
books.
The
Society
was
reconstituted
and
reconvened
in
2008
as
a
cooperative
in
memory
of
the
heritage
of
Fenwick
weavers.
The
Rochdale
Society
of
Equitable
Pioneers
established
the
3
See
further
here.
For
further
insight
into
the
history
of
the
coop
movement,
see
for
example
Shaffer,
J.
(1999).
Historical
Dictionary
of
the
Cooperative
Movement.
Scarecrow
Press.
4
Further
readings
on
the
Rochdale
Pioneers:
Holyoake,
G.
J.
(2012/1923).
The
History
of
the
Rochdale
Pioneers,
1844-‐1892.
Nabu
Press.
9
Rochdale
Principles
in
1844,
which
formed
a
basis
for
development
and
growth
of
the
modern
cooperative
movement.
These
principles
were
based
on
the
values
of
self-‐help,
self-‐responsibility,
democracy
and
equality,
equity
and
solidarity,
honesty
and
openness,
social
responsibility
and
caring
for
others.
These
principles
are
perceived
as
guidelines
on
running
a
responsible
business
for
the
community.
1.4.4 The
7
Cooperative
Principles5
What
distinguish
cooperatives
from
other
forms
of
enterprises
are
the
shared
ethical
and
yet
practical
values
that
form
the
basis
for
the
organization
and
operation
of
a
cooperative.
These
values
have
been
implemented
into
7
principles,
originally
presented
by
the
Rochdale
Pioneers.
The
principles
highlight
the
ethical
factor
of
the
cooperative
thinking,
e.g.
ethics
as
an
essential
aspect
of
the
local
economy:
1. Voluntary
and
open
membership:
Cooperatives
are
open
for
all
who
want
to
use
the
service
of
the
cooperative
and
also
accept
the
responsibilities
of
membership.
There
is
no
gender,
social,
racial,
political
or
religious
discrimination
regarding
membership.
2. Democratic
member
control:
Cooperatives
are
democratic
organizations
that
are
run
by
their
members.
Members
set
policies,
make
decisions
Image
3:
A
caricature
from
Von
Pischke,
J.
D.
&
regarding
the
organization
of
the
cooperative
and
Rouse,
J.G.
(2004).
New
Strategies
for
mobilizing
voting
rights
are
equal;
one
member,
one
vote
capital
in
agricultural
cooperatives
(online
(even
though
one
member
has
more
than
one
version,
see
share).
http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5469e/y5469e
00.htm#Contents
3. Member
economic
participation:
Contribution
of
members
is
equitable
and
the
cooperative
capital
is
common.
Compensations
of
members
are
limited
and
the
purpose
of
the
use
of
capital
is
to
develop
the
cooperative
and
supporting
other
activities
approved
by
the
membership.
The
members
will
benefit
in
accordance
with
their
proportion
of
transactions
with
the
cooperative.
5
See
for
example
here.
10
4. Autonomy
and
independence:
Cooperatives
are
autonomous,
self-‐help
organizations,
which
are
controlled
by
their
members.
External
agreements
and
capital
resources
are
depended
on
democratic
decisions
among
members.
5. Education,
training
and
information:
Cooperatives
provide
education
and
training
for
members,
elected
representatives,
managers
and
employees.
The
purpose
of
training,
education
and
providing
information
about
the
cooperative
form
is
to
contribute
to
the
development
of
the
cooperative
and
to
inform
the
general
public
on
the
nature
and
benefits
of
the
cooperative.
Special
emphasis
is
on
informing
young
people.
6. Co-‐operation
among
cooperatives:
The
emphasis
is
to
strengthen
the
cooperative
movement
by
cooperation,
in
order
to
create
effective
service
for
members
and
by
establishing
local,
regional,
national
and
international
structures.
7. Concern
for
community:
Cooperatives
aim
at
supporting
sustainable
development
of
their
communities
through
policies
approved
by
members.
These
principles
serve
as
a
guiding
light
in
all
aspects
of
the
cooperatives.
It
is
believed
that
cooperatives
which
implement
and
apply
these
principles
to
their
operations
usually
have
longer
lifespan
and
refrain
from
risk-‐taking
(which
may
diminish
the
danger
of
bankruptcy).
In
Trentino,
Italy
(as
an
example)
the
cooperative
movement
emphasizes
the
chart
of
cooperative
values,
mutuality
and
solidarity
as
‘constitutional
foundations’
of
cooperation
and
care
of
common
good;
social
responsibility
as
responsibility
towards
people
who
are
directly
involved
in
the
cooperative,
social
effects
of
work
and
development
and
welfare
in
society.
The
Trentino
cooperative
movement
also
highlights
the
inheritance
of
Don
Guetty,
who
was
a
priest
who
cared
for
the
needs
of
his
people;
implementing
the
spirit
of
cooperation
and
thus
establishing
a
relationship
between
church
and
the
world
of
work
in
Trentino.
6
6
See
Cooperazione
Trentina
–
public
documents
11
1.4.4.1 Case
study
-‐
The
principles
in
practice:
The
Cooperative
Group
Ltd.,
UK7
The
Cooperative
Group
in
UK
traces
its
roots
to
a
small
shop
in
Lancashire
and
to
the
Rochdale
Pioneers.
Since
1844,
The
Cooperative
Group
has
emerged
to
one
of
the
largest
organization
of
its
type
in
UK.
This
enterprise
is
an
example
of
a
cooperative
that
puts
the
values
and
principles
into
action.
The
values
are:
• Self
help
–
helping
people
to
help
themselves
• Self-‐responsibility
–
taking
responsibility
and
answer
for
their
actions
• Democracy
–
giving
members
a
say
in
how
the
business
is
run
• Equality
–
no
matter
how
much
money
a
member
invests
in
his/her
share
account,
he/she
still
has
one
vote
• Equity
–
the
business
is
carried
out
in
a
way
that
is
fair
and
unbiased
• Solidarity
–
sharing
interests
and
common
purposes
with
members
and
other
cooperatives
The
Cooperative
Group
has
specific
ethical
values:
• Openness
–
nobody
is
perfect
and
the
cooperative
will
not
hide
that
it
isn’t
perfect
• Honesty
–
the
cooperative
is
honest
about
what
it
does
and
the
way
it
is
done
• Social
responsibility
–
people
are
encouraged
to
take
responsibility
for
their
own
community
and
work
together
to
improve
it
• Caring
for
others
This
enterprise
takes
the
principles
of
the
Rochdale
pioneers
as
a
basis
in
their
strategy
and
puts
the
values
into
action:
1. Membership
is
open
to
everyone
(even
when
the
author
of
this
text
was
living
for
a
short
period
of
time
in
England,
she
was
offered
membership
at
the
Cooperative
group)
(Voluntary
and
open
membership)
2. All
members
have
an
equal
voice
in
making
policies
and
electing
representatives
(Democratic
member
control)
3. All
profits
are
controlled
democratically
by
members
and
for
their
benefit
(Member
economic
participation)
4. Cooperatives
are
always
independent
even
when
they
enter
into
agreements
with
the
government
and
other
organizations
(Autonomy
and
independence)
7
See
further
here.
12
5. Cooperatives
educate
and
develop
their
members
as
well
as
their
staff
(Education,
training
and
information)
6. Cooperatives
work
together
with
other
cooperatives
to
strengthen
the
cooperative
movement
as
a
whole
(Cooperation
amongst
cooperatives)
7. Cooperatives
also
work
to
improve
and
develop
the
community,
both
locally
and
internationally
(Concern
for
community)
As
an
example,
The
Cooperative
Group
has
worked
on
tackling
global
climate
change
through
cooperative
values
and
actions.
The
Cooperative
Group
is
one
of
the
largest
supporters
of
renewable
energy
programs
where
one
of
it´s
objectives
is
to
be
one
of
the
world’s
leading
businesses
tackling
global
climate
change.
Over
5000
branches
are
powered
by
renewable
energy
and
all
big
businesses
report
energy
consumption
and
carbon
emission
on
regular
basis.
The
cooperative
has
supported
initiative
projects
in
climate
change,
like
installing
photovoltaic
panels
at
schools
across
the
UK;
building
the
UK’s
largest
solar
panel
project;
supporting
the
construction
of
six
new
wind
turbines
and
building
the
largest
in-‐house
office
waste-‐recycling
centre
in
the
UK.
1.4.5 Different
forms
of
cooperatives8
There
are
four
different
mainstream
forms
of
cooperative
enterprises
existing
in
today’s
economy:
Firstly,
there
are
consumer
cooperatives
which
aim
is
to
provide
members
with
goods
and
services
for
their
personal
use.
Examples
of
consumer
cooperatives
are
food
cooperatives,
credit
unions,
housing
cooperatives
and
insurance
cooperatives.
8
See
further
here.
For
further
insight
into
the
history
of
the
coop
movement,
see
for
example
Shaffer,
J.
(1999).
Historical
Dictionary
of
the
Cooperative
Movement.
Scarecrow
Press.
13
Coop
Italia
Societá
Cooperativa
was
established
in
1947,
with
56.700
employees
and
7.400.000
members.
It
consists
of
115
consumer
cooperatives
and
is
the
largest
retail
chain
in
Italy
with
about
18.8%
market
share
and
is
one
of
the
leading
supermarket
chains
in
Europe
in
terms
of
corporate
social
responsibility
(according
to
global
consumer
watchdog
Consumers
International).
In
1995,
Coop
Italia
introduced
its
private
label
Fair
Trade
product
(coffee)
under
the
solidal
brand.
The
company
also
established
the
Coop
private
label,
which
implemented
the
SA8000
(Social
Accountability)
certification
in
order
to
maintain
ethical
standards
on
9
topics
like
safety
on
workplace
and
anti-‐child
labour
practices.
Secondly,
producer
/
marketing
cooperatives
which
market
their
members´
products
and
services
directly.
Some
cooperatives
may
also
sell
the
input
necessary
to
their
members’
economic
activities.
Examples
of
producer
/
marketing
cooperatives
are
agriculture
cooperatives,
pooling
of
equipment,
advisory
services
and
negotiations
of
prices
with
buyers.
Another
characteristic
of
a
producer
/
marketing
cooperative
is
the
way
of
assembling
products
from
smaller
units
/
producers
into
larger
quantities
to
processors,
wholesalers
and
retailers.
Agricultural
cooperatives
are
an
example
of
producer
/
marketing
cooperatives.10
First
Milk,
a
dairy
cooperative
in
UK
is
an
example
of
a
producer
/
marketing
cooperative,
with
700
employees
and
2000
members.
In
their
coop
story,
they
emphasize
that
‘through
our
members,
partners
and
joint
ventures,
co-‐operation
means
working
with
like-‐minded
who
share
our
ambitions,
passion
and
sustainability
beliefs.’
First
milk
has
five
different
strategic
´drivers’:
a)
Driving
returns
for
its
farmer
members;
b)
growing
its
brands;
c)
diversifying
its
product
and
customer
base;
d)
lowering
its
cost
to
serve
and
e)
seeking
value
in
partnerships.
Following
this
strategy,
the
company
has
grown
over
the
last
few
years,
expanded
markets
and
resulted
in
robust
business
in
the
benefit
for
its
members.
The
cooperative
produces
a
large
number
of
dairy
products
which
are
sold
all
over
UK,
every
11
1.5
seconds.
9
See
further
here
and
here.
10
For
more
information
on
agricultural
cooperatives
–
see
Von
Pischke,
J.
D.
&
Rouse,
J.
G.
(2004).
New
strategies
for
mobilizing
capital
in
agricultural
cooperatives.
Rome:
Food
and
Agriculture
Organization
of
the
United
Nations.
11
See
further
here and
here.
14
Thirdly,
worker
cooperatives
provide
cooperative
members
with
work
by
operating
an
enterprise
owned
by
their
employee
members.
Examples
of
worker
cooperatives
are
forestry
cooperatives,
leisure
cooperatives,
production
and
manufacturing
cooperatives,
tourism
cooperatives,
social
cooperatives
(especially
cooperatives
established
and
communications
cooperatives)
and
marketing
cooperatives.
Another
form,
worker-‐shareholder
cooperatives,
consists
of
incorporated
cooperatives
that
hold
partial
ownership
of
the
business
in
which
the
members
are
employed.
Because
of
its
share
capital,
the
cooperative
may
participate
in
the
management
of
the
business
and
the
workers
may
influence
work
organization.
‘Kooperativet
Lärkan’
in
Sweden
is
an
example
of
a
worker
cooperative.
Lärkan
has
36
members
/
owners
and
was
established
in
2005.
This
cooperative
has
various
types
of
activities,
for
example
a
second
hand
store,
gardening
service,
bike-‐repair
garage
and
a
café.
The
vision
of
the
cooperative
is
to
help
as
many
people
as
possible
to
get
a
fulfilled
life
and
empowerment.
Everybody
is
of
equal
value
and
everyone
deserves
and
also
has
12
the
right
to
have
a
good
life.
The
fourth
form,
purchasing
and
shared
service
cooperatives,
are
multi-‐stakeholder
cooperatives
where
membership
is
made
of
different
categories
of
members
who
share
a
common
interest
in
the
organization.
Those
cooperatives
belong
to
small,
independent
businesses
and
municipalities.
Examples
are
home
care
service
cooperatives,
health
cooperatives
and
community
service
cooperatives
(or
social
cooperatives).
12
See
further
here.
13
See further here and here.
15
Financial
or
credit
cooperatives
are
another
form
of
shared
service
cooperatives.
Cooperative
banks,
for
example,
provide
their
members
with
a
wide
range
of
banking
and
financial
services.
Cooperative
banks
must
respect
banking
regulations
but
what
differs
them
from
other
banks
are
the
values
and
principles
that
cooperative
banks
must
implement
in
their
everyday
activities.14
POP
Pankki
Group
is
an
association
of
36
independent
cooperative
banks
in
Finland,
founded
in
1997
with
709
employees
and
108.711
members.
Cooperative
banks
are
considered
important
in
Finland
and
have
one-‐third
of
bank-‐market
share,
which
is
one
of
the
highest
in
Europe.
Originally,
these
banks
belonged
to
the
Central
Cooperative
Banking
Group
(OP
Group)
but
split
from
it
in
the
1990s.
In
general,
cooperative
banks
in
Finland
came
out
stronger
than
other
banks
during
the
crisis.
The
managing
director
claims
that
‘the
POP
Bank
group
has
a
very
light
central
organization
and
operates
in
a
modern
and
cost-‐effective
way,’
he
says.
‘We
see
that
it
is
not
wise
to
make
everything
by
ourselves.
We
buy
services
from
the
best
vendors
or
partners.
We
focus
on
customer
relationships
and
have
outsourced
the
15
production
of
many
products
like
mutual
funds,
securities,
life
insurance
and
cards.’
14
See
further
information
on
cooperative
banks
here.
15
See
further
here
and
here.
16
See
Cooperatives
Europe
Activity
Review,
2006-‐2010
16
decision
makers.
However,
Poland
seems
to
be
an
exception
whereas
attitudes
seem
to
be
unfavourable
in
general,
due
to
the
connection
of
the
Polish
cooperative
movement
to
the
communist
regime
(based
on
findings
of
GAP
analysis
in
the
Conventus-‐project).
Main
obstacles
for
establishing
cooperatives
are
twofold:
Firstly
a
lack
of
financing
and
secondly
a
limited
knowledge
of
cooperatives
as
a
business
format.
The
economic
downturn
in
Europe
following
the
2008
recession
has
prevented
people
and
companies
from
investments
in
new
businesses.
This
affects
all
sectors
and
all
business
formats.
However
the
co-‐operative
business
format
should
attract
risk
aversive
investors.
Therefore
the
two
obstacles
mentioned
above
could
be
overcome
by
increased
awareness
and
business
education
in
the
regions.
In
order
to
put
the
general
attitudes
into
perspectives,
the
state-‐of-‐the-‐art
of
five
European
countries
will
be
described
in
next
section
(based
on
findings
of
GAP
analysis
in
the
Conventus-‐project).
1.4.7 The
cooperative
movement
in
Finland
The
Finnish
Cooperative
movement
emerged
in
1900-‐1910.
Retail
cooperatives
are
the
biggest
branch
and
cooperatives
play
an
important
role
in
rural
area’s
sustainable
development.
Big
cooperatives
are
important
employers
and
service
suppliers
in
rural
regions
and
employee-‐owned
cooperatives
are
growing
in
numbers
and
creating
jobs.
This
development
has
been
especially
beneficial
for
young
graduate
professional
in
areas
where
sustainable
cooperative
development
is
practiced.
Attitudes
towards
cooperatives
in
Finland
vary
between
different
regions.
Attitudes
are
positive
in
areas
that
have
cooperative
development
organizations
and
cooperatives
are
now
accepted
as
‘real’
business
forms.
Attitudes
are
therefore
twofold
–
general
neutral
reaction
towards
for
example
SOK,
which
is
the
biggest
coop
market
and
there
seems
to
be
little
knowledge
on
the
service
cooperatives,
which
have
a
challenging
role.
At
the
moment,
there
is
a
grave
discussion
in
Finland
on
using
the
cooperative
form
in
the
public
health
service.
Young
people
in
Finland
generally
have
positive
attitudes
towards
entrepreneurship
but
the
threshold
to
start
own
business
seems
to
be
reasonably
high.
Joint
entrepreneurship,
establishing
a
business
together
with
friends/colleagues
attracts
younger
generation
and
there
has
been
growing
trend
to
find
cooperative
model
as
a
business
solution
in
variety
of
areas,
e.g.
in
community
farms
(farm/field
cooperatives
owned
by
usually
urban
people
to
produce
fresh
food)
and
knowledge
intensive
worker
cooperatives.
17
However,
there
seem
to
be
positive
influences
whereas
the
public
is
getting
tired
of
marketing
forces
and
a
growing
emphasis
on
sustainability
of
the
communities.
However,
there
is
still
a
tendency
of
considering
the
cooperatives
merely
as
‘playgrounds’
instead
of
real
enterprises,
whereas
main
operations
of
cooperatives
are
based
on
the
community
and
are
non-‐profit.
In
general,
negative
attitudes
are
linked
to
ignorance
and
bad
experiences
from
cooperatives
and
could
possibly
be
altered
with
more
information
and
more
visibility.
It
is
also
considered
important
to
increase
number
of
members
of
existing
cooperatives,
get
more
help
from
the
government
and
make
the
cooperative
laws
more
effective.
The
case
of
Finland
is
‘Pienkoti
Akseliina’
located
in
the
town
of
Kemi
in
South
Lapland.
The
cooperative
is
working
in
Social
and
Health
care
branch
by
producing
the
intensive
service
of
the
habitation
for
elderly
people
suffering
from
dementia.
The
cooperative’s
mission
is
to
provide
accommodation,
which
combines
safety
and
home-‐like
informality.
The
service
includes
medicine
control
and
service
of
home
care
nurses
and
the
staff
takes
care
of
shopping
and
other
daily
needs
for
the
elderly.
The
cooperative
was
established
in
1999
and
it
has
7
owners,
6
of
them
working
with
social
and
health
care
issues
and
most
of
them
have
basic,
local
or
public
health
degrees,
including
one
in
social
17
service.
The
annual
revenue
is
400
000
€.
1.4.7.1 What
can
we
learn
from
the
cooperative
movement
in
Finland?
In
Finland,
the
cooperative
form
has
been
used
to
some
extent
in
social
sector,
mainly
as
worker
cooperatives
owned
by
social
sector
professionals.
Cooperatives
play
an
important
role
in
the
development
of
rural
regions,
whereas
they
support
sustainable
development
and
serve
as
a
platform
for
young
university
graduates
in
order
to
utilize
their
expertise
in
their
home
area.
Cooperatives
could
cover
much
more
of
social
service
needs
and
services
now
offered
by
municipalities
or
private
companies.
There
is
growing
interest
towards
cooperative
model
in
both
the
social
and
healthcare
sector,
and
some
research
is
done
on
cooperative
potential
in
elderly
care
sector
which
covers
also
idea
of
user
cooperatives
(service
cooperative
owned
by
elderly
people
or
their
family).
17
See
further
here.
18
1.4.8 The
Cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
The
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
emerged
in
the
latter
part
of
the
19th
century.
At
the
time,
Iceland
was
first
and
foremost
a
poor
society
of
farmers
who
lived
in
poor
conditions
with
little
space
for
agriculture
and
little
access
for
trading
goods.
Trade
in
Iceland
had
been
monopolised
by
the
Danish
for
over
200
years
at
the
time,
where
Icelanders
had
to
pay
high
prices
for
imported
goods
but
received
low
prices
for
their
exported
goods.
The
Danish
merchants
had
all
the
power
regarding
prices
and
while
many
Icelandic
households
were
high
in
debts
for
merely
buying
bare
necessities,
the
Danish
merchants
collected
enormous
amount
of
wealth.
Poverty,
along
with
natural
disasters,
such
as
volcanic
eruptions
and
cold
seasons
had
resulted
in
a
large-‐scale
immigration
(14000
Icelanders)
to
USA
and
Canada
in
the
period
1870
–
1914.
Therefore,
the
roots
of
the
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
emerged
from
a
need.
The
first
cooperatives
were
farmers’
cooperatives,
established
in
1882.
Major
part
of
Icelandic
cooperatives
were
mixed
cooperatives
around
the
country,
running
groceries,
dairy
productions,
butcheries,
fisheries,
garage
repairs,
carpentries
and
other
operational
units,
formed
the
basis
in
the
20th
century
Icelandic
economy.
However,
the
Cooperative
Movement
(SÍS)
collapsed
in
the
latter
part
of
1980s,
causing
cooperatives
around
the
country
to
go
bankrupt.
This
collapse
resulted
in
rather
negative
attitudes
towards
cooperatives
and
the
cooperative
form,
which
was
considered
to
be
‘monopoly-‐oriented’
and
also
due
to
the
political
association
of
the
cooperatives
with
the
Progressive
Party.
Cooperative
managers
were
accused
of
corruption
and
the
political
debate
was
negative
as
well.
After
the
collapse
of
the
cooperative
movement,
there
was
an
increased
emphasis
on
privatisation
and
free-‐market
capitalism.
However,
following
the
economic
collapse
in
2008,
there
is
a
growing
interest
in
sustainability
and
social
responsibility
of
companies
instead
of
a
‘free
and
independent,
pure
capitalism’,
and
thus
there
might
be
a
basis
for
the
cooperative
form
in
Iceland.
Still
there
is
little
public
debate
on
the
cooperative
form
and
the
general
public
is
yet
not
aware
of
the
real
cooperative
ideology
and
worldwide
use
of
the
cooperative
form.
The
cooperative
laws
must
be
reviewed
and
more
public
discussion
is
needed,
without
the
political
connection
in
the
past.
Main
obstacles
for
cooperatives
in
Iceland
are
firstly
a
general
lack
of
economic
investments
and
low
stimulus
for
investments.
Secondly,
the
attitude
seems
to
be
still
quite
negative,
especially
among
those
who
can
remember
the
collapse
of
the
cooperative
movement
in
the
1980s.
Thirdly,
the
existing
cooperatives
in
Iceland
(like
Kaupfélag
Skagfirðinga)
are
still
linked
to
controvertible
businessmen
and
a
certain
political
movement
(the
Progressive
Party)
and
there
is
a
lack
of
renewal
in
membership
in
current
cooperatives.
The
Icelandic
cooperative
laws
can
be
found
here.
19
NPA
Centre
is
a
non-‐profit,
social
cooperative
operating
in
the
social
and
health
sector,
owned
and
managed
by
people
with
disabilities
in
Iceland.
This
cooperative
was
founded
in
2010
with
33
founding
members
and
is
one
of
the
youngest
cooperatives
in
Iceland.
The
main
purpose
of
the
cooperative
is
to
provide
personal
services
and
assistance
to
people
with
disabilities
by
using
direct
municipal
funding
(which
is
provided
by
law)
in
order
to
recruit
their
own
staff
and
thus
influence
how
they
arrange
the
assistance
they
need
in
everyday
life.
The
second
purpose
is
to
provide
short
seminars
and
courses
for
disabled
people
and
their
family
members.
Assistants
(hired
by
members
themselves)
work
according
to
job
description
written
by
members
themselves,
according
to
their
needs
and
wishes.
The
aim
is
to
enable
disabled
people
to
live
the
life
they
want
to
live,
to
have
same
opportunities
to
live
their
life
like
non-‐disabled
people
and
manage
how
the
assistance
is
organized
and
tailor-‐made
according
to
everyone´s
personal
needs
and
lifestyle.
The
ideology
of
the
NPA
Centre
is
based
on
the
philosophy
of
independent
living,
which
has
its
roots
to
the
disability
rights
movement
in
the
70s
and
is
today
a
worldwide
movement
of
people
with
disabilities
‘working
for
self-‐determination,
self-‐
respect
and
equal
opportunities.
In
order
to
become
a
member
of
NPA
Centre,
prospective
members
need
to
fulfil
these
terms
(according
to
the
regulations,
paragraph
4):
“Individuals,
who
have
disabilities
have
access
to
accepted
municipal
payments
can
become
members
of
NPA
and
use
the
service
of
the
cooperative.
Those
individuals,
who
have
disabilities
and
have
not
yet
access
to
municipal
payments,
have
the
right
to
join
the
cooperative.
Members
must
pay
10
000
ISK
when
joining
the
cooperative
and
become
a
18
member.
1.4.8.1 What
can
we
learn
from
the
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland?
As
evident
in
the
summary
above,
the
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
collapsed
in
1990s
and
general
attitudes
in
Iceland
seem
to
be
linked
to
the
history,
with
special
emphasis
on
the
collapse
of
the
movement,
as
previously
mentioned.
The
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
was
also
strongly
associated
with
the
Progressive
Party
–
thus
the
cooperative
debate
was
always
been
political.
Thus
the
biggest
challenge
in
Iceland
will
be
to
establish
a
new
cooperative
thinking,
free
of
the
political
associations
from
the
past.
18
See
further
here.
20
1.4.9 The
Cooperative
movement
in
Trentino,
Italy
The
province
of
Trentino
is
a
mountain
area
located
in
the
North
of
Italy,
only
2%
of
Italy
and
60%
of
the
area
is
above
100
m
altitude.
This
area
used
to
be
one
of
the
poorest
areas
in
Italy
in
the
19th
century
resulting
in
emigration
of
24000
to
America
from
1870
to
1890.
The
first
cooperatives
were
established
in
order
to
support
the
area
and
reduce
poverty
–
in
1890s
the
first
consumer
cooperative
and
cooperative
bank
in
Trentino
were
established.
The
cooperatives
play
an
important
role
in
Trentino’s
socio-‐economic
framework
and
create
both
wealth
and
employment
for
the
society
with
2,6
billion
Euros
in
income
and
provide
work
for
17.000
people.
At
the
same
time,
unemployment
rate
is
very
low
in
the
province
of
Trentino;
4,5%
compared
to
11,5%
in
Italy.
The
cooperatives
support
the
wellbeing
of
members
and
the
community,
whereas
50%
of
inhabitants
(500
000)
are
members.
The
cooperative
system
in
Trentino
is
a
both
social
and
cultural
movement
in
close
relationship
with
the
community
and
creates
a
large
proportion
of
the
local
economy;
90%
of
local
agriculture,
55%
of
the
credit
sector
and
38%
in
the
consumer
sector.
The
cooperative
system
aims
at
resolving
and
improving
welfare
of
its
members
and
the
community.
Attitudes
towards
cooperatives
are
quite
positive
among
the
public
in
Trentino,
due
to
its
historical
context
and
in
comparison
with
other
forms
of
enterprises.
There
is
a
strong
belief
in
the
origins
and
traditions
as
a
family
heritage
and
this
region
is
generally
open
for
this
kind
of
business
model.
Local
authorities
show
interest
in
cooperatives,
which
is
represented
at
a
local
level
with
a
specific
department
for
the
development
of
cooperatives.
However,
public
bodies
still
see
cooperative
enterprises
only
as
SMEs,
without
emphasising
their
social
role
and
characteristics.
Local
academic
interest
is
also
not
as
great
as
it
could
be
considering
the
impact
of
cooperatives
in
the
economy
and
territorial
development.
There
are
no
particular
obstacles
for
establishing
a
cooperative
in
the
province
of
Trentino
–
on
the
contrary,
political
and
socio
economic
frameworks
favour
and
support
their
development.
21
Risto3
is
the
biggest
worker
cooperative
in
Trentino
with
its
over
30
years
of
experience,
380
members
and
1.042
employees
and
a
widespread
presence
throughout
the
local
territory
providing
approximately
6
million
meals
a
year
from
its
250
kitchens
(catering
and
especially
canteens
in
schools
and
for
workers),
with
an
annual
revenue
of
about
45
millions
euros.
Since
its
beginnings
in
1979
(started
with
5
women
who
had
lost
their
jobs)
it
has
become
leader
in
the
catering
industry,
thanks
also
to
the
professionalism
of
its
workers
and
an
entrepreneurial
strategy
that
has
always
privileged
high
quality
service
and
products.
In
fact,
they
are
very
rigorous
in
choosing
local
produce
and
suppliers,
respecting
the
environment,
actively
recycling,
and
undergoing
regular
health
and
hygiene
controls
to
assure
maximum
food
safety.
Social
cohesion
and
employment
are
important
features
of
this
coop
as
Risto3
is
one
of
the
few
enterprises
that
responds
especially
to
women’s
needs
for
flexible
working
hours,
and
is
an
example
of
integration
of
different
cultures
employing
women
from
40
different
countries.
They
are
also
very
active
in
charities
in
less
19
developed
countries.
1.4.9.1 What
can
we
learn
from
the
cooperative
movement
in
Trentino?
Trentino
is
an
example
of
a
region
with
a
strong
cooperative
culture,
where
cooperatives
play
an
important
social
and
economic
role
in
the
region.
It
is
in
fact
one
of
the
European
regions
with
the
highest
density
of
cooperative
enterprises
in
the
greatest
variety
of
economic
sectors,
some
of
which
have
been
active
since
the
end
of
the
19th
century.
Over
the
years,
the
cooperative
experience
in
Trentino
has
further
expanded
from
the
traditional
areas
of
credit,
agriculture
and
consumers,
to
now
encompass
social
services,
environmental
management,
energy
production,
culture
and
education.
The
cooperative
system
in
Trentino
is
therefore
a
worthy
case
study
for
those
studying
social
economics
as
it
reflects
many
of
the
transformations
in
cooperation
in
Italy
and
in
Europe.
The
experience
of
Trentino
however
does
not
claim
to
be
exemplary
compared
to
other
models,
although
it
is
unique,
and
can
be
an
inspiration
when
seeking
new
strategies
to
face
modern
day
challenges
of
our
societies.
The
main
characteristics
of
the
cooperative
model
in
Trentino
are:
19
See
further
here:
http://www.risto3.it
22
1) Small
cooperatives
-‐
cooperative
enterprises
are
mostly
small
and
medium
size
in
Trentino,
due
to
the
geographic
morphology
of
the
territory
characterized
by
mountainous
areas
and
to
the
administrative
subdivision
into
many
valleys
and
small
communities
(only
2%
of
the
217
municipalities
have
5,000
–
15,000
inhabitants,
30%
between
500
–
1,000
and
22%
less
than
500
inhabitants).
Smaller
cooperatives
have
the
advantage
of
being
able
to
encourage
a
stronger
sense
of
belonging
with
the
territory
and
are
closer
to
their
members,
allowing
specific
interventions
and
providing
a
better
solution
for
community
needs.
2) Consortia
-‐
are
second
level
organizations
whose
members
are
cooperatives.
This
is
one
of
the
successful
key
elements
of
the
cooperative
model
in
Trentino,
where
consortia
have
a
fundamental
role
in
assisting
and
strengthening
the
small
cooperative
enterprises
in
facing
the
global
market
as
the
Consortia
coordinate
and
integrate
the
activities
of
each
sector,
providing
technical
assistance,
marketing
services,
consultancy,
training
and
research
for
the
cooperatives
associated.
3) Central
position
of
the
Federation
of
Cooperation,
which
is
horizontal
and
not
a
third
level
organization,
as
both
cooperatives
and
consortia,
can
adhere
and
benefit
from
the
services
provided.
The
Federation
legally
acts
as
political
representative
of
the
system
at
local,
national
and
international
levels,
carrying
out
accounting
and
bookkeeping
services,
supervisory
boards
and
auditing
services.
The
Federation
is
the
only
representative
organisation
of
the
cooperative
system
(a
single
system
that
groups
together
all
sectors:
consumer,
credit,
agriculture,
labour,
social,
service
and
housing)
as
a
result
of
the
joining
in
2000
of
two
different
representative
organisations:
Confcooperative
(of
Catholic
orientation
or
white
cooperation)
and
Legacoop
(social
orientation
or
red
cooperation).
1.4.10 The
cooperative
movement
in
Poland
In
Poland,
rural
cooperatives
were
established
in
the
19th
century
–
the
first
cooperative
was
established
in
1816
for
peasants
and
in
the
1860s
agricultural
and
trade
cooperatives,
dairy
cooperatives
and
savings
and
loans
cooperatives
were
established,
but
were
oppressed
by
the
authorities.
In
Poland,
cooperatives
have
usually
been
associated
with
communism.
After
1948,
farmers
were
put
under
political,
administrative
and
economic
pressure
to
join
cooperatives.
However,
in
1956,
farmers
began
to
abandon
the
cooperatives.
From
1960
to
the
end
of
the
communist
era,
the
state
intervened
in
the
decision
making
in
the
cooperatives’
productions.
However,
after
the
end
of
the
communism,
the
functioning
of
the
cooperatives
was
abolished,
their
assets
sold
below
value
and
the
market
was
opened
for
foreign
goods
(Ilona
Banaszak).
23
The
attitude
is
unfavourable
mostly
due
to
the
recent
historic
heritage
and
association
with
the
communist
era.
Generally
the
cooperative
business
model
is
not
perceived
as
an
alternative
business
model
and
has
been
disregarded
by
the
political
elites
of
the
country
for
the
past
20
years.
The
result
of
which
has
been
the
diminishing
number
of
cooperative
societies
–
it
has
diminished
by
half
since
1989.
The
second
reason
for
unfavourable
growth
conditions
is
that
the
law
give
more
privileges
to
commercial
companies
than
cooperative
societies,
which
pushes
co-‐operators
to
seek
the
way
out
of
the
cooperative
sector.
Additionally,
the
government
has
been
negative
towards
cooperatives,
there
is
a
lack
of
interest
of
Polish
citizens
in
setting
up
new
cooperatives
and
lack
of
renewal
in
membership.
In
Poland,
generally,
the
attitude
is
not
favourable,
both
among
the
representatives
of
political
powers
and
mass
media,
which
translates
into
the
same
negative
opinion
of
the
majority
of
Polish
people
(apart
from
the
persons
connected
with
the
cooperative
sector).
The
reasons
may
be
a
certain
lack
of
knowledge
on
the
cooperative
business
model,
its
historical
role
in
Poland
and
the
association
with
the
communist
era.
There
is
certain
fascination
with
the
liberal
ideas
and
disapproval
of
all
communal
forms
in
favour
of
individualism.
However,
there
has
been
some
positive
change
of
the
attitude.
The
cooperative
ideas
are
becoming
more
and
more
attractive
among
certain
youth-‐groups,
the
attitude
of
some
politicians
has
been
gradually
improving.
The
President
of
Poland
has
expressed
some
positive
opinion
on
the
cooperative
sector
and
has
organized
a
cooperative
forum.
On
the
other
hand,
as
far
as
legal
context
is
concerned,
cooperatives
in
Poland
are
treated
worse
than
commercial
companies/private
firms.
What
is
missing
is
stable
cooperative
legislation,
all
legal
initiatives
tend
to
abolish
or
limit
the
scope
of
activity
of
the
cooperative
sector.
It
has
a
great
impact
on
–
alongside
the
already
mentioned
factors
–
the
general
attitude
towards
cooperatives
and
it
certainly
does
not
encourage
people
to
set
up
new
cooperatives.
The
Polish
cooperative
sector
has
a
substantial
social
influence.
Polish
cooperative
sector
translates
into
9000
cooperative
societies,
8
million
members
and
around
300.000
employees.
Members
of
the
cooperative
societies
altogether
with
their
families
form
almost
half
of
the
Polish
population.
Cooperative
business
model
is
associated
with
stability
and
social
safety
due
to
cooperative
principles,
which
determine
democracy,
solidarity,
self-‐help,
co-‐operation
etc.
–
all
the
features
that
the
corporate
world
is
deprived
of.
1.4.10.1 What
can
we
learn
from
the
cooperative
movement
in
Poland?
24
In
the
Polish
context,
it
is
first
and
foremost
important
to
educate
politicians,
journalists
and
the
youth
to
make
them
understand
that
the
cooperative
sector
is
not
the
relict
of
the
old
times;
that
cooperatives
proved
to
be
immune
to
the
global
crisis,
that
cooperatives
are
important
for
worldwide
economies.
The
second
thing
would
be
to
provide
a
good,
stable
cooperative
legislation.
Those
sectors,
which
have
succeeded
lately,
were
provided
with
reasonable
legal
solutions.
The
third
thing
would
be
to
support
all
initiatives,
especially
of
the
young
people
setting
up
new
forms
of
cooperatives
(social
cooperatives
for
example)
and
forms
resembling
cooperatives,
which
may
contribute
to
the
attitude
change.
Education
should
exemplify
the
advantages
of
choosing
the
cooperative
business
model
by
showing
the
best
practices
not
only
in
other
countries,
but
also
in
Poland.
It
would
be
worth
underlining
what
problems
–
similar
to
those
in
Poland
–
have
been
solved
with
the
help
of
cooperative
sector,
but
also
what
kind
of
obstacles
occurred
while
setting
up
and
daily
activities
of
cooperatives
and
how
these
problems
were
overcome.
Cooperative
values
and
principles
should
also
be
stressed
as
factors,
which
strongly
differentiates
the
cooperative
sector
from
the
commercial
one.
It
is
also
important
to
be
reminded
of
the
cooperative
tradition
and
of
all
the
great
persons
who
have
been
connected
with
the
cooperative
sector
throughout
the
history.
It
should
be
emphasized
that
being
a
co-‐operator
is
the
reason
to
be
proud,
but
not
to
be
ashamed.
1.4.11 The
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden
The
Swedish
cooperate
movement
began
to
emerge
in
the
1890s,
following
the
growth
of
Sweden´s
industrial
revolution.
The
working
class
grew
rapidly
in
urban
areas
and
in
the
era
between
1896
and
1899,
200
new
consumer
cooperatives
were
established.
There
is
a
general
lack
of
knowledge
of
this
specific
form
of
enterprise
in
Sweden.
Cooperatives
are
not
considered
an
important
part
of
the
economy
and
are
considered
rare,
even
sometimes
regarded
as
an
old
and
out-‐of-‐date
way
of
running
a
business;
often
confused
with
voluntary
associations.
However,
attitudes
among
young
people
tend
to
be
more
positive
and
there
is
a
growing
interest
among
politicians
and
decision
makers
towards
cooperative
entrepreneurship
in
social
enterprises.
What
seems
to
be
the
main
problem
is
the
lack
of
visibility,
which
is
a
result
of
lack
of
resources
for
marketing
purposes.
Therefore,
more
visibility
is
needed
in
order
to
make
the
public
aware
of
the
cooperative
form.
It
is
necessary
to
increase
the
number
of
social
enterprises
and
include
them
as
a
part
of
community
development.
New
cooperatives
in
the
field
of
renewable
energy
(wind,
power,
biogas)
have
emerged
and
also
in
the
fields
of
health
care,
social
care
and
household
services.
Small-‐scale
collaboration
in
local
foods
are
a
growing
area
within
the
cooperative
movement
in
rural
areas,
like
Skaraborg.
25
Main
obstacles
that
cooperatives
in
Sweden
are
facing
are
lack
of
financing
and
a
general
lack
of
knowledge
about
the
cooperative
movement
and
the
cooperative
as
a
form
of
enterprise.
‘Kooperativet
Lärkan’
in
Sweden
is
an
example
of
a
worker
cooperative.
Lärkan
has
36
members
/
owners
and
was
established
in
2005.
This
cooperative
has
various
types
of
activities,
for
example
a
second
hand
store,
gardening
service,
bike-‐repair
garage
and
a
café.
The
vision
of
the
cooperative
is
to
help
as
many
people
as
possible
to
get
a
fulfilled
life
and
empowerment.
Everybody
is
of
equal
value
and
everyone
deserves
and
also
has
20
the
right
to
have
a
good
life.
1.4.11.1 What
can
we
learn
from
the
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden?
The
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden
has
especially
focused
on
social,
health
and
community
cooperatives,
as
well
as
housing
cooperatives.
The
role
of
many
social
cooperatives
is
to
fight
poverty,
help
socially
excluded
people
to
find
their
own
platforms
in
their
lives
(such
as
people
with
mental
health
problems
and
also
with
disabilities)
and
encourage
people
suffering
from
long-‐term
unemployment
to
establish
their
own
businesses.
This
form
of
enterprise
also
plays
an
important
role
in
regional
development,
especially
in
regions
like
Skaraborg.
The
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden
has
a
long
tradition
of
pursuing
activities
in
housing,
insurance,
agriculture
and
consumer
cooperatives.
These
organizations
have
become
very
strong
with
a
large
number
of
members.
Today
there
is
a
new
way
of
working
within
the
co-‐operative
movement;
we
call
it
the
“new
cooperation”.
Today
we
can
see
new
cooperative
enterprises
in
the
sectors
of:
culture,
renewable
energy,
infrastructure,
schools
/day
care
centres,
health/social
care
and
social
cooperatives.
There
is
a
great
interest
concerning
the
social
enterprises
from
both
society
and
the
public
sector.
These
companies
allow
individuals
who
do
not
fit
into
the
labour
market
or
for
those
who,
for
various
reasons,
need
a
platform
to
be
able
to
go
on
to
studies
or
work.
The
Swedish
form
Cooperative
economic
association
is
tailor-‐made
for
cooperation.
Cooperative
companies
can
be
run
under
a
variety
of
different
corporate
structures.
A
cooperative
economic
20
See
further
here.
26
association
is
often
ideal,
because
the
relevant
legislation
is
designed
to
handle
a
democratic
approach
to
ownership.
All
joint
owners/members
of
the
association
have
a
vote
and
they
decide
jointly
on
how
to
allocate
a
surplus.
A
cooperative
economic
association
(in
common
with
a
limited
company)
is
a
legal
entity.
It
must
comprise
at
least
three
people
or
companies
and
the
members
must
decide
jointly
on
the
size
of
the
start-‐up
capital.
The
cooperative
movement
has
taken
place
in
society
by
creating
sustainable
businesses
that
create
growth,
locally,
regionally
and
nationally.
.
1.5 Assignments
and
exercises
1.5.2 Discussions
• What
is
a
coop
in
your
opinion?
• What
is
your
first
memory
of
a
cooperative?
• In
your
opinion,
which
one
of
the
cooperative
principles
is
the
most
important?
Least
important?
Why?
• Can
you
recognise
the
implementation
of
the
coop
principles
in
a
coop
you
know?
• Describe
the
ideal
cooperative
–
what
kind
of
cooperative
would
you
like
to
establish
and
why?
27
2 Module
2:
Being
a
cooperative
member
2.1 Module
description
This
module
aims
at
making
cooperative
members
aware
of
what
it
means
to
be
a
member
in
a
cooperative
and
to
enable
them
to
become
more
active
as
members.
Before
undergoing
this
module,
it
is
essential
for
students
to
finish
module
1
(history
and
ideology
of
the
cooperative
movement).
The
focus
is
directed
towards
the
role,
duties
and
rights
of
the
cooperative
member
within
the
cooperative
laws
and
legislations
(national
level),
highlight
the
benefits
of
being
a
cooperative
member
and
make
members
aware
of
the
social
responsibility
of
the
membership,
joint
ownership
and
democratic
control.
Special
focus
will
be
on
success
stories
(best
practice
–
case
studies)
of
cooperatives
characterized
by
the
active
participation
of
its
members.
2.2 Learning
outcomes
Knowledge
/
attitudes
After
this
module,
student
should
be
aware
of
their
…
• Status
as
cooperative
members
• Benefits
and
responsibilities
as
members
• Role,
duties
and
rights
within
cooperative
laws
(as
stated
in
the
civil
code)
Skills
/
useful
tools
After
this
module,
students
should
have
the
ability
to
…
• Evaluate
possible
membership,
consider
personal
situation
and
aims
• Identify
issues
concerning
memberships
in
statutes
and
coop
legislation
• Work
and
make
decisions
and
becoming
more
active
as
members
• Put
cooperative
values
and
principles
into
action,
while
being
active
members
• Identify
the
ways
in
which
different
coop
organisations
involve
their
members
• Identify
strategies
to
improve
members
participation
• Identify
the
role
of
members
in
the
governance
process
of
your
cooperative
28
2.3 Target
groups
This
module
is
especially
aimed
at
cooperative
members
and
cooperative
workers.
This
can
also
be
targeted
at
cooperative
managers
and
board
members,
as
well
as
co-‐operators
to-‐be.
• Cooperative
members
• Cooperative
workers
(if
they
are
members
of
cooperatives)
• Cooperative
managers
• Cooperative
board
members
• Co-‐operators
to-‐be
• Cooperative
trainers
and
advisors
2.4 Module
2
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
According
to
the
Green
Paper
on
Corporate
Social
Responsibility21
companies
are
increasingly
promoting
their
‘corporate
social
responsibility
strategies
as
a
response
to
a
variety
of
social,
environmental
and
economic
pressures’.22
In
this
case,
companies
have
in
many
cases
put
their
focus
on
social
development,
environmental
issues
and
protection
and
the
respect
on
fundamental
rights,
supporting
sustainability
and
regional
development.
This
ideology
on
corporate
social
responsibility
is
one
of
the
guiding
lights
of
the
cooperative
movement
in
general
–
to
direct
the
focus
on
democratic
issues
and
taking
responsibility
for
the
society
and
the
environment.
2.4.1 Being
a
cooperative
member
–
what
does
it
mean?
General
and
open
membership
is
the
core
of
what
makes
cooperatives
different
from
other
businesses.
But
what
is
a
cooperative
membership
all
about?
When
you
are
a
member
of
a
cooperative,
you
are
a
member
of
a
community
of
people
who
share
the
same
goals
and
have
a
say
in
how
the
cooperative
is
run.
21
Commission
of
the
European
Communities,
2001
22
Commission
of
the
European
Communities,
2001,
p.
3
29
As
an
example,
The
Cooperative
Group
in
UK23
build
their
membership
on
four
main
pillars:
1. Sharing
the
profits
–
when
a
member
buys
something
from
one
of
the
cooperative
businesses,
the
member
earns
points,
which
are
added
up
twice
a
year
and
the
member
receives
his/her
share
of
the
profits
as
cash,
plus
all
kinds
of
special
offers.
2. Supporting
your
community
–
included
in
the
membership
is
an
involvement
in
the
Cooperative
Membership
Community
Fund,
which
supports
all
kinds
of
projects
within
local
communities
and
members
can
donate
a
share
of
their
profits
if
they
so
wish.
3. Changing
the
world
–
The
Cooperative
Group
runs
a
global
campaign,
which
aims
at
tackling
important
issues
like
climate
change
and
human
rights.
As
an
example,
members
can
go
to
movie
premieres
which
are
organised
to
highlight
the
issue
being
supported,
or
members
can
sign
up
for
regular
support
4. Having
your
say
–
members
have
a
say
in
how
the
business
is
run.
The
Cooperative
Group
has
member
representatives
across
all
regions
that
speak
on
behalf
of
local
people.
Any
member
can
become
a
representative.
In
a
nutshell,
being
a
cooperative
member
means
that
you
have
a
say
in
how
the
company
is
run.
Usually
members
elect
their
representatives
who
work
closely
with
the
management
of
the
cooperative,
making
sure
that
views
of
members
are
heard
and
that
cooperatives
stick
to
the
cooperative
principles.24
2.4.2 What
do
the
7
principles
of
cooperatives
say
about
cooperative
membership?
In
order
to
highlight
the
cooperative
principles
from
module
1,
they
highlight
and
emphasize
the
rights
and
obligations
of
cooperative
members.
• Firstly,
cooperatives
are
open
for
all
who
want
to
use
the
service
of
the
cooperative
(1
–
Voluntary
and
open
membership).
23
See
further
here.
24
See
as
an
example
membership
in
the
Cooperative
Group
UK.
30
• Secondly,
the
keyword
of
cooperatives
is
democracy
–
the
cooperatives
are
independent
run
by
their
members
(4
–
Autonomy
and
independence)
who
set
the
policies
and
make
all
major
decisions
regarding
the
organisation
of
the
cooperative.
The
key
is
one
member
=
one
vote,
regardless
of
how
many
shares
one
member
has
(2
–
Democratic
member
control).
• Thirdly,
the
cooperative
capital
is
common
and
contribution
of
members
is
equitable.
Furthermore,
compensations
of
members
are
limited
and
the
purpose
of
the
use
of
the
capital
is
to
develop
the
cooperative
and
support
activities
approved
by
members,
so
the
members
will
benefit
in
accordance
with
their
proportion
of
transactions
with
the
cooperative
(3
–
Member
economic
participation)
• Fourthly,
members
of
cooperatives
can
enjoy
education
and
training
provided
by
cooperatives
in
order
to
contribute
to
the
development
of
the
cooperative
and
inform
the
public
on
the
nature
and
benefits
of
the
cooperative
(5
–
Education
and
training).
• Fifthly,
by
becoming
a
member,
an
individual
is
therefore
a
part
of
a
larger
community
of
cooperatives
and
participates
in
activities
that
support
sustainable
development
of
their
communities
(6
–
Co-‐operation
among
cooperatives
and
7
–
Concern
for
community).
2.4.3 Being
a
cooperative
member
in
Iceland
Iceland
In
1991,
the
current
laws
on
cooperatives
(1991,
no.
22,
27th
March)
were
agreed
in
the
Icelandic
Parliament.
According
to
the
1st
paragraph,
the
purpose
of
the
law
is
to
highlight
the
aim
of
the
cooperatives
to
improve
lives
of
members
with
their
active
business
participation
in
the
cooperative.
There
are
no
limits
on
how
many
members
can
join
a
cooperative
and
the
amount
of
start-‐up
funding
not
centrally
decided
by
law.
Members
are
also
not
financially
responsible
for
the
cooperative.
In
the
2nd
paragraph,
the
aims
of
cooperatives
are
described
in
three
different,
but
interrelated
pillars:
• Firstly
to
provide
members
and
other
customers
with
goods,
products
and
services
for
their
own
use
31
• Secondly,
to
process
and
sell
products
provided
by
members
in
their
own
private
businesses
(like
farmers
and
other
small
producers)
• Thirdly
to
provide
services
that
aim
at
supporting
members
and
for
the
benefit
of
members
Membership
in
a
cooperative
in
Iceland
is
open
to
all
individuals
who
are
willing
to
participate
directly
in
the
cooperative´s
activities
or
businesses
(15th
paragraph).
If
an
individual
wants
to
become
a
member,
he/she
must
turn
to
the
Cooperative
board
and
send
a
request
for
membership
(16th
paragraph).
However,
according
to
17th
paragraph,
membership
and
membership
rights
are
not
inheritable,
cannot
be
sold
to
another
individual
by
the
member
and
membership
share
cannot
be
collected
if
the
member
is
in
debt.
General
member
meetings
are
a
venue
for
decision-‐making
–
further
details
on
the
rights
of
members
and
laws
on
Icelandic
cooperatives
can
be
found
here.
2.4.3.1 Examples
of
cooperative
membership
in
Iceland
As
an
example
of
a
membership
in
an
Icelandic
cooperative,
membership
in
the
NPA-‐centre
(an
Icelandic
social
cooperative
for
disabled
individuals)
is
based
on
the
ideology
of
independent
living
for
people
with
disabilities.
The
core
of
the
ideology
is
that
every
person
can
make
his/her
own
decision
regarding
his/her
life,
choose
their
own
support
and
assistance
and
shape
their
own
lifestyle.
Every
disabled
person
has
the
right
of
controlling
his/her
own
life
and
participates
in
the
society
on
his/her
own
terms.
Thus
the
power
of
deciding
what
kind
of
service
they
receive
goes
from
the
public
authorities
to
the
individuals
themselves.25
25
See
further
www.npa.is
32
2.4.4 Becoming
an
active
cooperative
member
Being
a
board
member
in
a
cooperative
means
being
able
to
make
decisions
advantageous
to
members
of
cooperatives.
However,
often
there
is
no
time
taken
to
think
about
who
the
members
actually
are,
what
interests
they
may
have,
how
they
can
be
part
of
the
coop,
and
what
their
rights
and
duties
may
be.
It
is
therefore
important
to
understand
the
different
ways
of
concretizing
the
coop’s
relationships
with
their
members.
One
of
the
concerns
of
board
members
is
to
encourage
cooperative
members
to
become
more
active
in
their
membership.
As
an
example,
The
Cooperative
Group
in
UK
provides
members
with
various
ways
or
methods
of
becoming
more
active
as
members.
Many
consumer
coops
within
the
Group
have
staff
whose
role
is
to
support
and
communicate
with
the
local
community,
members
and
representatives.
Members
can
thus
firstly
contact
their
local
membership
team.
2.4.4.1 Case:
Active
membership
in
The
Cooperative
Group
UK
As
an
example,
the
cooperative
group
in
UK
has
various
ways
of
including
members
in
the
activities
of
the
cooperatives
and
how
to
make
members
more
active.
Thus
they
work
with
membership
and
cooperation
in
the
community
on
regular
basis.
For
example,
members
are
often
involved
in
organising
community
events
–
the
cooperative
encourages
members
to
work
together
on
such
events
and
check
if
the
cooperative
can
support
the
event
or
other
activities
by
offering
vouchers,
funding
or
advice.
The
co-‐operators
(or
cooperative
management)
are
thus
encouraged
to
establish
a
working
relationship
with
local
membership
teams,
who
for
example
are
in
a
working
relationship
with
local
membership
teams.
33
Cooperatives
often
establish
community
funds
or
other
funds
on
supporting
good
cause
in
the
community
where
members
can
donate
a
part
of
the
profit
that
the
cooperative
gives
back
to
its
members.26
2.5 Assignments
and
exercises
2.5.2 Discussions
• Are
you
a
member
of
a
cooperative?
Which
cooperative/s
and
why?
• What
is
the
benefit
of
joining
a
coop?
• Describe
your
contribution
to
your
cooperative/s
• How
would
you
increase
members’
activities
in
your
cooperative?
• How
do
members
participate?
(customers
/
members
…)
• Why
do
coops
need
members?
• Why
do
people
join
coops?
• Compare
membership
in
coops
to
being
a
member
in
other
organizations
–
what
is
the
difference?
• What
motivates
members
to
take
part
in
activities?
• Describe
the
current
position
in
relation
to
membership
in
their
coop
and
movement
34
3 Module
3:
Establishing
a
new
cooperative
business
3.1 Module
description
This
module
aims
at
people
who
are
interesting
in
establishing
their
own
business
(who
may
or
may
not
have
large
amount
of
capital)
and
are
open
for
using
the
cooperative
form.
The
cooperative
laws
and
regulations
are
introduced
(in
every
partner
country,
for
different
sectors)
and
students
will
also
learn
about
the
difference
between
a
private
company
and
a
cooperative.
However,
the
main
emphasis
of
this
module
will
be
to
introduce
and
teach
co-‐operators
to-‐be
to
develop
a
cooperative
business
plan;
e.g.
how
to
get
members,
how
to
develop
the
structure
and
strategy
of
their
cooperatives,
doing
a
feasibility
study,
defining
target
groups,
making
a
marketing
analysis
and
a
financial
plan.
By
using
success
stories,
the
main
aim
is
to
raise
awareness
among
future
co-‐operators
on
the
possibilities
It
is
recommended
for
students
that
are
enrolled
in
this
module
that
they
undergo
module
1
prior
to
this
module.
3.2 Learning
outcomes
Knowledge
/
attitudes
After
this
module,
student
should
…
• Be
aware
of
the
fundamental
factors
and
issues
in
making
a
cooperative
business
plan
• Be
aware
of
the
cooperative
principles
and
values
in
the
process
of
developing
a
cooperative
business
plan
• Be
aware
of
the
differences
between
a
cooperative
and
other
business
models;
i.e.
their
potential
and
flexibility
of
the
cooperative
enterprise
model
Skills
/
useful
tools
After
this
module,
students
should
have
the
ability
to
…
• Create,
evaluate
and
further
develop
a
business
idea
• Make
a
marketing
/
need
analysis
in
order
to
check
the
feasibility
of
the
business
idea
• Create
a
business
plan
by
using
business
plan
templates
35
• Establish
a
cooperative
business
start-‐up
3.3 Target
groups
This
module
is
primarily
targeted
at
co-‐operators
to-‐be
and
also
prospective
cooperative
members
and
workers
(who
can
be
used
as
focus
groups
during
the
development
of
the
cooperative
business
plan).
• Co-‐operators
to-‐be
• Cooperative
trainers
and
advisors
• Prospective
cooperative
members
and
workers
(focus
group?)
36
3.4 Module
3
-‐
Reading
material
for
students
3.4.1 Starting
a
cooperative
–
what
do
you
need
to
keep
in
mind?
A
cooperative
is
a
real
business
–
there
is
a
general
misunderstanding
that
cooperatives
are
more
like
charities
or
public,
social
bodies.
No,
a
cooperative
is
a
form
of
real
business.
Before
deciding
on
establishing
a
cooperative,
here
are
few
questions
that
individuals,
who
are
considering
establishing
a
cooperative,
must
have
in
mind:
• What
is
the
cooperative
going
to
do?
• Is
there
a
need
for
the
cooperative?
Is
there
a
gap
/
place
in
the
market
for
the
cooperative?
• Is
there
a
demand
for
the
product(s)
/
service(s)
that
the
cooperative
provides?
• Is
it
possible
for
you
to
supply
the
need,
product
or
service
on
a
competitive
basis?
• Who
will
own
and
control
the
cooperative?
• Who
will
be
involved
in
the
cooperative
and
how?
• Who
are
likely
to
be
cooperative
members
(e.g.
a
target
group)
and
which
mutual
benefits
are
present
(both
for
the
cooperative
and
the
cooperative
members)?
• What
is
their
motivation
to
join
a
cooperative?
Do
they
have
different
needs
and
if
so,
how
can
the
cooperative
fulfil
different
set
of
needs?
• How
will
you
finance
the
cooperative,
especially?27
Considering
these
questions
will
help
you
whether
the
business
idea
is
a
realistic
option,
whether
it
needs
more
consideration
and
refinement
or
whether
the
idea
is
more
linked
to
suit
better
to
be
a
subject
for
a
voluntary
or
community
group
work
organization,
instead
of
a
cooperative
business.
27
See
further
http://www.uk.coop/start-‐co-‐op
and
http://www.uk.coop/form/quiz-‐co-‐operative-‐right-‐me
37
3.4.2 Setting
up
a
cooperative
in
7
steps
In
order
to
‘frame’
the
working
process
of
establishing
a
cooperative,
it
is
essential
to
have
the
following
7
steps
in
mind
(based
on
material
from
Coompanion,
Skaraborg):28
28
Based
on
material
from
Coompanion
Skaraborg,
Sweden
38
• Firstly,
to
avoid
unnecessary
work
and
prevent
unnecessary
conflict
• Secondly,
if
everyone
has
a
clear
picture
of
what
to
do
in
the
cooperative,
then
it
is
more
likely
that
the
group
will
go
together
in
the
same
direction,
which
is
more
successful
in
the
long
run.
39
Thirdly,
a
part
of
making
a
business
plan
is
to
plan
how
to
fund
the
company´s
start-‐up
and
also
demonstrate
how
the
budget
will
be
controlled
and
whether
the
income
will
support
the
sustainability
of
the
company.
These
information
are
important
both
for
banks
and
investors
who
are
willing
to
provide
funding
into
the
business.
Fourthly,
the
business
plan
will
describe
the
function
of
the
business
idea;
it
provides
an
overview
of
the
company,
whether
it
will
be
profitable,
which
goals
are
set
and
how
to
measure
them.
Fifth,
the
business
plan
will
demonstrate
the
amount
of
start-‐up
capital
and
in
general,
the
business
plan
provides
customers,
employees,
insurers,
accountants
and
other
stakeholders
to
have
an
overview
of
the
objectives
and
goals
of
the
business.
What
is
also
a
key
factor
when
making
a
business
plan
is
how
to
implement
the
cooperative
ideology
and
principles
into
the
business
plan,
the
key
strategy,
structure
and
operation
of
the
future
cooperative.
It
must
be
taken
into
account
how
cooperation
could
and
should
be
a
part
of
the
business
plan.
Is
it
visible
or
hidden
or
does
it
give
competitive
advantage
compared
to
other
businesses.?
In
summation:
Is
the
business
idea
“cooperative,’
a
result
of
collaboration
of
same/different
branch
professionals?
Does
membership
attract
customers,
have
positive
effects
on
the
mutual
strength
of
members
and
does
the
cooperation
have
positive
effect
on
issues
like
risk
management?
These
are
all
factors
that
need
to
be
taken
into
account
through
the
whole
process
of
writing
a
cooperative
business
plan.
40
A
start-‐up
budget
is
an
estimate
of
the
necessary
costs
to
start
up
a
company
(investments,
machinery,
office
furnitures,
register
costs
etc.).
The
estimated
amount
of
start-‐up
budget
indicates
whether
there
is
a
sufficient
amount
of
capital
available
(from
investors,
for
example)
or
whether
you
need
to
take
a
bank
loan
for
the
start-‐up.
Cash
budget
refers
to
monthly
payments
and
incomes
and
indicates
whether
there
is
enough
income
to
pay
for
expenses
and
necessary
bills.
It
also
evaluates
the
viability
of
the
company
and
therefore
it
is
important
to
make
an
estimate
on
potential
income
and
expenses
for
at
least
a
year
ahead
(some
companies
make
estimates
3
years
ahead).
Thus
revenues
will
cover
the
costs
and
bridge
the
time
needed
to
produce
a
surplus,
which
can
partly
be
used
for
development
of
the
company
and
its
employees.
41
• What
is
the
role
of
the
board
and
how
often
should
it
meet?
• Which
principles
(in
terms
of
decision
process)
should
be
the
guiding
light
of
this
particular
company?
• How
should
the
daily
work
within
the
company
be
allocated
and
how
should
daily
routines
be
organised?
• In
what
way
should
responsibilities
be
shared?
In
a
nutshell,
it
is
vital
to
determine
major
priorities
and
make
sure
that
everyone
is
involved
in
decision-‐
making
and
who
has
the
responsibilities
to
act
in
accordance
to
these
decisions.
42
3.5 Assignments
and
excercises
Methods:
Entrepreneurship
• Business
plan
• Marketing
• Budget
plan
The cooperative/group
Methods:
Tools:
• democratic
decisions
Four
field
model
• common
decisions
Cooperative
Quality
• common
vision
OPERA
• the
group's
overall
knowledge
and
experience
Open
Space
Information
43
• European
Cooperative
society
(SCE)
Entrepreneurship
Management Information
The
cooperative/
group
44
4 Further
readings
• Birchall,
J.
(1997).The
International
co-‐operative
movement.
Manchester
University
Press.
• Holyoake,
G.
J.
(2012/1923).
The
History
of
the
Rochdale
Pioneers,
1844-‐1892.
Nabu
Press.
• Shaffer,
J.
(1999).
Historical
Dictionary
of
the
Cooperative
Movement.
Scarecrow
Press.
• Zamagni,
S.
&
Zamagni,
V.
(2010).
Cooperative
Enterprise
–
Facing
the
challenge
of
Globalization.
Cheltenham:
Edward
Elgar
Publishing
Ltd.
• Van
Bekkum,
O.F.
(2001).
Cooperative
Models
and
Farm
Policy
Reform.
Exploring
Patterns
in
Structure
–
Strategy
Matches
of
Dairy
Cooperatives
in
Protected
vs.
Liberalized
Markets.
The
Netherlands
Institute
for
Cooperative
Entrepreneurship.
Articles
• Chloupkova,
J.
(2002).
European
Cooperative
Movement
–
Background
and
Common
Denominators.
Unit
of
Economics
Working
Papers
2002/4.
Copenhagen:
The
Royal
Venerinary
and
Agricultural
University.
• Skurnik,
S.
(2002).
The
role
of
cooperative
entrepreneurship
and
firms
in
organising
economic
activities
–
past,
present
and
future.
LTA,
p.
103-‐124.
45
• Skurnik,
S.
And
Vihirälä,
V.
(1999).
Role
of
Cooperative
Entrepreneurship
in
the
Modern
Market
Environment:
Introduction
and
Summary.
LTA,
p.
375-‐383.
• Normak,
P.
(1996).
A
role
for
cooperatives
in
the
market
economy.
Annals
of
Public
and
Cooperative
Economies
67(3),
p.
429-‐439.
• Birchall,
J.
&
Ketilson,
L.H.
(2009).
Resilience
of
the
Cooperative
Business
Model
in
Times
of
Crisis.
International
Labour
Organization.
• Pellervo.
(1999,
June).
The
Role
of
cooperative
Entrepreneurship
in
the
Modern
Market
Environment
[proceedings].
Special
issue
in
Finnish
Journal
of
Business
Economics.
http://www.pellervo.fi/finncoop/proceedings.html
• International
Co-‐operative
Alliance.
(2007).
Factsheet:
Differences
between
Co-‐operatives,
Corporations
and
Non-‐Profit
Organisations.
(Source:
US
Overseas
Cooperative
Development
Council).
The
cooperative
movement
in
Finland
Books online
46
• Pellervo.
(2000).
Corpaorate
Governance
and
Management
Control
in
Cooperatives.
Conferderation
of
Finnish
Cooperatives.
http://www.pellervo.fi/cg/raportti.pdf
• Pellervo.
(n.d.).
The
Pellervo
story
–
A
Century
of
Finnish
Cooperation
1899-‐1999.
Confederation
of
Finnish
Cooperatives.
http://www.pellervo.fi/finncoop/material/PStory.pdf
The
cooperative
movement
in
Sweden
Articles
• Westlund,
H.
(2003).
Social
economy
and
employment
–
the
case
of
Sweden.
Review
of
Social
Economy
LXI(2
–
June),
p.
163-‐182.
The
cooperative
movement
in
Iceland
• Helgi
Skúli
Kjartansson,
Jónas
Guðmundsson
og
Jón
Sigurðsson.
(2002).
Samvinnuhreyfingin
í
sögu
Íslands.
Reykjavík:
Sögufélag
http://www.sogufelag.is/efni/samvinnuhreyfingin_%C3%AD_s%C3%B6gu_%C3%ADslands_0
• Guðrún
Jóhannsdóttir.
(2007).
Breytingastjórnun
–
Hvað
varð
um
Samvinnuhugsjónirnar?
Óútgefið
lokaverkefni
í
viðskiptafræði.
Háskólinn
á
Akureyri.
http://skemman.is/stream/get/1946/861/2908/1/HA040445_LOK.pdf
Books
in
English
• Malmström,
V.H.
(1958).
A
Regional
Geography
of
Iceland.
National
Academy
of
Sciences
–
National
Research
Council,
Iceland.
47
• Karlsson,
G.
(2000).
Iceland´s
1100
Years
–
A
history
of
a
marginal
society.
London:
C.
Hurst
&
Co.
(p.
243-‐266)
The
cooperative
movement
in
Poland
Articles
• Chloupkova,
J.,
Svendsen,
G.L.cH.,
&
Gert
Tinggaard
Svendsen.
(2003).
Building
and
destroying
social
capital:
The
case
of
cooperative
movements
in
Denmark
and
Poland.
Agriculture
and
Human
Values
20,
p.
241
–
252.
The
cooperative
movement
in
Trentino
(Italy)
Articles
• Menzani,
T.
&
Zamagni,
V.
(2010).
Cooperative
Networks
in
the
Italian
Economy.
Enterprise
&
Society
11(1),
March,
p.
98-‐127.
• The
Chart
of
Values
of
the
Trentino
cooperative
system
-‐
an
analysis
of
the
values
and
principles
that
lay
the
foundations
for
the
ethical
reasons
behind
the
cooperative
movement
is
essential
to
understand
the
history
of
the
cooperative
movement
in
Trentino
and
it
importance
at
international
level.
This
is
a
summary
of
the
evolution
of
cooperative
ethics
that
pays
particular
attention
to
the
indications
given
in
the
Chart
of
Values
(file
Coop
Principles
&
Values
–
in
Italian);
• Working
papers
-‐
Euricse
-‐
Cooperatives:
The
Italian
experiences
di
Carlo
Borzaga,
Sara
Depedri,
Riccardo
Bodini
–
(in
English);
• Principi
cooperativi
per
il
ventunesimo
secolo
(Cooperative
principles
in
the
XXI
century)
by
Ian
MacPherson
• Books-‐
only
titles:
o Le
cooperative
by
Alberto
Ianes,
o
COOP-‐
Il
future
dell’impresa
cooperativa
by
Giulio
Sapelli,
48
o La
Cooperazione,
tra
mercato
e
democrazie
by
Stefano
Zamagni
and
Vera
Zamagni.
Useful
websites
• www.stories.coop
• www.co-‐opstudies.org
• http://www.euricse.eu/
• http://2012.coop/en
• www.euricse.eu
49