Preformulation Studies
Preformulation Studies
Preformulation Studies
net/publication/322910385
CITATION READS
1 3,953
1 author:
Manoj Mishra
Shambhunath Institute of Pharmacy, Allahabad, India
65 PUBLICATIONS 63 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Manoj Mishra on 03 February 2018.
Review Article
Received 06 Sept 2016 Received in revised form 21 Sept 2016 Accepted 23 Sept 2016
Corresponding Author:
Garima Verma,
Shambhunath Institute of Pharmacy, Jhalwa, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh-211012, India.
Email: garima.srivastava2111@gmail.com, bmanojmishra@gmail.com
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Before starting the preformulation studies, team consisting of representatives from the
we should know the properties of the drug, disciplines has responsibility for assuring
potency relative to the competitive that the compound enters the development
products and the dosage form, literature process in its optimum molecular form.
search providing stability and decay data, When the first quality sample of new drug
the proposed route of drug administration, becomes available, probing experiments
literature search regarding the formulation should be conducted to determine the
approaches, bioavailability and magnitude of each suspected problem area.
pharmacokinetics of chemically related If a deficiency is detected the project team
drugs. should decide on the molecular
Once a pharmacologically active modifications that would most likely
compounds has been identified, a project improves the drug properties. Salts,
perhaps because there are fewer sites of the crystalline solvates are formed. Pseudo-
drug molecule available for interaction with polymorphs can be differentiated from true
water during dissolution. A classic example polymorphs by observing melting behavior
is theophylline anhydrate, which dissolves in silicon oil using hot stage microscopy.
faster than its hydrate form [13,14]. In Here in this technique pseudo polymorphs
other cases, the hydrate form exhibits a evolve gas (steam or solvent vapors)
more rapid dissolution rate than its causing bubbling of the oil. While true
anhydrous form: for example, erythromycin polymorphs merely melts, forming second
dihydrate was found to exhibit a globular phase.
significantly faster dissolution rate than Hygroscopicity- Many drug substances,
that of monohydrate and anhydrous forms particularly water soluble salt forms have a
[15,16]. tendency to adsorb atmospheric moisture.
Glibenclamide has been isolated as pentanol Adsorption and equilibrium moisture
and toluene solvates, and these solvates content can depend upon the atmospheric
exhibited higher solubility and dissolution humidity, temperature, surface area,
rate than two non-solvated polymorphs exposure and mechanism for moisture
[17]. The physical stability of hydrates and uptake [22]. Deliquescent materials adsorb
anhydrous forms strongly depends upon sufficient water to dissolve completely, as is
the relative humidity and/or temperature observed with sodium chloride on a humid
of the environment [18-20], and transitions day. Other hygroscopic substances adsorb
from one form to the other occur as a water because of hydrate formation or
consequence of variations in storage specific site absorption. With most
conditions and/or technological treatments hygroscopic material, changes in moisture
[21]. In particular, anhydrous to hydrate level can greatly influence many important
transitions can occur during dissolution at parameters, such as chemical stability,
the drug/medium interface and can affect flowability and compatibility.
dissolution rate and perhaps bioavailability To test for hygroscopicity, samples of bulk
[18]. drug are placed in open containers with a
Type of Polymorphism- There are two thin powder bed to assure maximum
types of polymorphs- enantiotropic atmospheric exposure. These samples are
polymorphs and monotropic polymorphs. then exposed to arrange of controlled
ENANTIOTROPHS: - If one form stable over relative humidity environment prepared
certain pressure and temperature range, with saturated aqueous salt solutions [23].
while the other polymorph is stable over Moisture uptake should be monitored with
different pressure and temperature range. various time intervals of handling (0 to 24
e. g., sulfur. hrs) and storage duration (0 to 12 weeks).
MONOTROPHS: - only one polymorph is Analytical methods for monitoring the
stable at all temperature below the melting moisture level (i.e. gravimetry, TGA, Karl
point, with all other polymorph being Fischer titration or gas chromatography)
unstable. glyceryl stearate, chloramphenicol depends upon the desired precision and the
palmitate. amount of moisture adsorbed on to the
Pseudo polymorphism-The term pseudo drug sample.
means false. Phenomenons in which solvent Fine Particle Characterization- Bulk flow,
molecules get incorporated into crystal formulation homogeneity and surface area
lattice of solid are known as solvates. This controlled processes such as dissolution
solvates exist in different crystal form called and chemical reactivity are directly affected
pseudopolymorphs and the phenomenon is by size, shape, and surface morphology of
called as pseudopolymorphism. Also known the drug particles.
as hydrates when water is solvent. When A light microscope with a calibrated grid
the potent synthetic estrogen ‘ethynyle- usually provides adequate size and shape
stradiol’ is crystallized from the solvents characterization for drug particles [24].
acetonitrile, methanol, chloroform and Sampling and preparation of the
saturated with water four different microscopic slide must be performed
occupied by the powder when the particles rate of dissolution [31]. Analytical methods
are not in direct contact with each other. that are useful for solubility measurements
However, a more realistic definition can be include HPLC, UV spectroscopy, florescence
given by the density measured after the spectroscopy and gas chromatography. For
powder been aerated and left to settle most drugs, reverse phase HPLC offers an
gently. The tapped bulk density is obtained efficient and accurate means of collecting
after tapping the container enclosing the solubility data. The commonly used solvent
aerated powder [27]. The compressibility for the determination of the solubility are
index has an inverse relation with 0.9% NaCl solution, 0.01M HCl, 0.1M NaOH
flowability, i.e. the more compressible is the etc. The pH, temperature, ionic strength and
material the less flowable it will be [28]. A buffer concentration mainly affect the
powder with a compressibility index lower solubility of the drug.
than 20% is considered to have a good pKa determination: Determination of
flowability [30]. dissociation constant for a drug capable of
The Hausner ratio is defined as the ratio ionization with in a pH range of 1 to 10 is
between the tapped bulk density and the important since solubility, consequently
aerated bulk density. This ratio is a useful absorption, can be changed by changing in
measure of cohesion reflecting particle pH. The Henderson Hasselbach equation
friction. With a Hausner ratio higher than provides an estimate of the ionized and un-
1.4, the powder is considered a cohesive ionized drug concentration at particular pH.
difficult to fluidize powder. Ratios lower For acidic compounds:
than 1.25 characterizes a free-flowing pH = pKa + log [ionized drug] /
powder [27]. [unionized drug]
Solubility Analysis- One important goal of For basic compounds:
the pre‐formulation effort is to devise a pH = pKa + log [unionized drug] /
method for making solutions of the drug. A [ionized drug]
drug must possess some aqueous solubility For weakly acidic drug with pKa value
for therapeutic efficacy. In order for a drug greater than 3, the unionized form is
to enter the systemic circulation to exert a present within the acidic contents of the
therapeutic effect, it must first be in stomach, but the drug is ionized mainly in
solution. Relatively insoluble compounds the neutral media of the intestine. For basic
often exhibit incomplete absorption. When drugs such as erythromycin and papaverine
a solute dissolves, the substance's inter- (pKa 8 to 9), the ionized form is
molecular forces of attraction must be predominant in both the stomach and the
overcome by forces of attraction between intestine.
solute and solvent molecules. This involves A pKa value can be determined by variety of
breaking the solute‐solute forces and the analytical methods. Buffer, temperature,
solvent-solvent forces to achieve the ionic strength and cosolvent effect. The
solute‐solvent attraction. It focuses on preferred method is the detection of
drug‐solvent interactions that could occur spectral shifts by ultraviolet or visible
during the delivery of a drug candidate. For spectroscopy. A second method,
example, orally administered drug should potentiometric titration offers maximum
be examined for solubility in simulated sensitivity for compounds with pKa values
gastric media. We need to perform in the range of 3 to 10.
solubility analysis of a new drug to provide pH solubility profile and common ion
a basis for later formulation work and can effect: The degree of ionization and
affect drug performance. Drugs with an therefore, the solubility of acidic and basic
aqueous solubility less than 1% (10 mg/ml) compounds depend on the pH of the
will suffer from bio absorption problems. medium. The saturation solubility for such
Preformulation solubility studies include compounds at particular pH is the sum total
determination of pKa, temperature of solubility of ionized and unionized forms
dependence, pH solubility profile, solubility [32].
products, solubilization mechanism and
In a saturated solution of a salt with some greater than the heat necessary to separate
undissolved solid, there exists equilibrium the molecules of acetone and chloroform,
between the excess solid and the ions which can be detected as rise in
resulting from the dissociation of the salt in temperature of the liquid.
the solution [33]. The addition of a common Solubilization: The drug candidate with
ion reduces the solubility of the slightly either poor water solubility or insufficient
soluble electrolyte. This salting out(drug solubility for projected solution dosage
precipitation) results from the removal of forms, preformulation studies should
solvent molecules from the surface of the include limited experiments to identify
electrolyte by the hydration of the common possible mechanisms for solubilization. A
ion. Salting in larger anions (hydrotropes) general means of increasing solubility is the
e.g. benzoates, salicylates can open the addition of a cosolvent to the aqueous
water molecules allowing an increase in system. The solubility of poorly soluble
solubility of poorly-water soluble drugs. nonelectrolytes can often be improved by
Example hydrochloride salts often exhibit orders of magnitude with suitable
lower solubility in gastric juice due to the cosolvents such as ethanol, propylene glycol
abundance of the chloride ions. and glycerin [33]. These cosolvent
To explore a common ion interaction, the solubilize drug molecules by disrupting the
dissolution rate of a hydrochloride salt hydrophobic interactions of water at the
should be compared in different media: nonpolar solute/ water interfaces. The
Water and 1.2% w/v NaCl, 0.05 M HCl and commonly used and acceptable cosolvents
0.9% w/v NaCl in 0.05 M HCl. It is useful in in formulation of aqueous liquids for oral
the choice of a suitable salt form for the solutions are- ethanol, sorbitol, glycerin,
proper dissolution and accordingly PEG. For parenteral products,
enhanced absorption. Factors affecting dimethylacetamide is widely used. But in
degradation rates are temperature, effect of case of oral liquids its application is limited,
pH and others such as ionic strength, because of its objectionable odor and taste.
co‐solvent, presence and absence of O2, Cosolvent effects for dissociated drug
presence of antioxidants and presence of molecules are usually much less [34]. Some
chelating agent. poorly soluble drugs can be solubilized in
Effect of temperature: The solubility of micellar solutions such as 0.01M Tween 20
solute in a solvent is dependent on or via molecular complexes as with caffeine
temperature, nature of solute and nature of [35, 36]. These specific formulations are
solvent. The heat of solution represents the usually not developed during the
heat released or absorbed when a mole of preformulation phase.
solute is dissolve in a large quantity of Partition Coefficient: A measurement of a
solvent. Most of the substances are drug’s lipophilicity and an indication of its
endothermic, absorbing heat in the process ability to cross cell membrane is the
of dissolution. For these substances, an oil/water partition coefficient in systems
increase in temperature results in increase such as octanol/water and
in solubility. Exothermic substances give off chloroform/water. The partition coefficient
heat in the process of dissolution. The is defined as the ratio of unionized drug
solubility of such substances would distributed between the organic and
decrease with increase in temperature. Care aqueous phase at equilibrium.
should be taken as heat may destroy a drug Po/w = Coi l/ Cwater
or cause other changes in the solution. E.g. For drug delivery, the
on excess of heating the sucrose solution lipophilic/hydrophilic balance has been
converted into the invert sugar. Depending shown tobe contributing factor for the rate
on the type of reaction whether it is and extent of drug absorption [37, 38].
endothermic or exothermic heat is either Dissolution [39]: The dissolution rate of a
absorbed or released e.g. mixture of drug is only important where it is the rate
chloroform and acetone. The heat produced limiting step in the absorption process. The
by the solute- solvent interaction is so much solubility of a drug exceeded to 1mg/ml at
12. Khankari, R.J.; Grant, D.J.W. Pharmaceutical 27. Abdullah, E.C., Geldart, D. The use of bulk
hydrates. Thermochim. Acta 1995, 248, 61– density measurements as flowability
79. indicators, Powder Technol. 1999, 102, 151–
13. Shefter, E.; Higuchi, T. Dissolution behavior 165.
of crystalline solvated and nonsolvated forms 28. Carr, R. Evaluating flow properties of solids,
of some pharmaceuticals. J. Pharm. Sci. 1963, Chem. Eng. 1965, 72, 163–168.
52, 781–791. 29. Nagel, K. M., Peck, G. E. Investigating the
14. Shan, N.; Zaworotko, M.J. Polymorphic effects of excipients on the powder flow
Crystal Forms and Cocrystals in Drug characteristics of theophylline anhydrous
Delivery (Crystal Engineering). Drug Dev. powder formulations, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.
2010. 2003, 29, 277–287.
15. Allen, P.V.; Rahn, P.D.; Sarapu, A.C.; 30. Guerin, E, Tchoreloff, P, Leclerc, B, Tanguy, D,
Vanderwielen, A.J. Physical characterization Deleuil, M, Couarraze, G. Rheological
of erythromycin: Anhydrate, monohydrate, characterization of pharmaceutical powders
and dihydrate crystalline solids. J. Pharm. Sci. using tap testing, shear cell and mercury
1978, 67, 1087–1093. porosimeter, Int. J. Pharm. 1999,189, 91–103.
16. Blagden, N.; de Matas, M.; Gayan, P.T.; York, P. 31. Streng, W.H., Hsi S. K., Helms, P.E., Tan, H. G.
Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical H. General treatment of pH–solubility
ingredients to improve solubility and profiles of weak acids and bases and the
dissolution rates. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2007, effects of different acids on the solubility of a
59, 617–630. weak base. J. Pharm. Sci.1984, 73, 1679-
17. Datta, S.; Grant, D.J.W. Crystal structures of 1684.
drugs: Advances in determination, prediction 32. James K. Solubility and related properties,
and engineering. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1986; 127–
3, 42–57. 146: 355–395.
18. Di Martino, P.; Barthélémy, C.; Palmieri, G.F.; 33. Blagden, N,De Matas, M, Gavan, P.T., York, P.
Martelli, S. Physical characterization of Crystal engineering of active pharmaceutical
naproxen sodium hydrate and anhydrate ingredients to improve solubility and
forms. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 14, 293–300. dissolution rates, Adv. Drug Del. Reviews
19. Di Martino, P.; Barthélémy, C.; Joiris, E.; 2007; 10: 1-7.
Capsoni, D.; Masic, A.; Massarotti, V.; Gobetto, 34. Williams, N.A., and Amidon, G.L. Excess free
R.; Bini, M.; Martelli, S. A new tetrahydrated energy approach to the estimation of
form of sodium naproxen. J. Pharm. Sci. 2007, solubility in mixed solvent systems II:
96, 156–167. Ethanol-water mixtures J.Pharm Sci. 1984,
20. Malaj, L.; Censi, R.; di Martino, P. Mechanism 73, 14-18.
for dehydration of three sodium naproxen 35. Mulley, B. A.: Solubility in systems containing
hydrates. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9, 2128– surface active agents. In Advances in
2136. Pharmaceutical Sciences. Vol.1 Edited by H.s.
21. Di Martino, P.; Malaj, L.; Censi, R.; Martelli, S. Bean, A. H. Beckett and J.E. Carless. Academic
Physico-chemical and technological press, London, 1964, pp.87.
properties of sodium naproxen granules 36. Foster, S., Wurster, D.E., Higuchi, T., Busse
prepared in a high-shear mixer-granulator. J. L.W. J. American. Pharm. Assoc., (Sci. Ed.)
Pharm. Sci. 2008, 97, 5263–5273. 40:123, 1951.
22. Van Campen, L., Amidon, G.L., and Zografi, G. 37. Dressman, J. B., Fleisher, D., Amidon, G. L.
Moisture sorption kinetics for water-soluble Physicochemical model for dose-dependent
substances I: Theoretical considerations of drug absorption J. Pharm Sci. 1984, 73:1274-
heat transport control J. Pharm. Sci. 1279.
1983,72:1381-1388. 38. Suzuki, A., Higuchi, W.I., Ho., N. F.H.
23. Weast, R.C.: CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Theoretical model studies of drug absorption
Physics. 55th Ed. Press, Clevland, 1974, pp.E- and transport in the gastrointestinal tract I J.
46. Pharm Sci. 1970, 59:644-651.
24. Kaye, B.H.: Chemical Analysis: Direct 39. Martin, A., Swarbrick. J., and Cammarata, A.
Characterization of fine particles. Vol 61.John Physical Pharmacy: Physical Chemical
wiley and Sons, New York 1981. Principles in the pharmaceutical sciences.3rd
25. York, P.Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 1996, 55, 1291- ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1983.
1296. 40. Mooney. K. G., Mintun, M.A., Himmelstein, K.J.,
26. Rios, M. Developments in powder flow Stella, V.J. Dissolution kinetics of carboxylic
testing, Pharm. Technol. 2006, 30, 38–49. acids I: Effect of pH under unbuffered
conditions. J. Pharm. Sci., 1981, 70,13-22.