MJB Design
MJB Design
MJB Design
PROJECT TITLE:
CONTRACTORS:
TITLE OF CALCULATION:
CONSULTANT:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
315-316, VISHAL CHAMBERS SECTOR-18, NOIDA-201301
TEL: 0120-4570703, Fax: 0120-4310433, E-mail: admin@bsecpl.in
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED
Prepared By
PROJECT REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI Rev:
CAPITAL CITY Satyam
Component Structure:
Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet R0
SKJ
Wall
CONTENTS
1 GENERAL
Component Structure:
Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet R0
SKJ
Wall
INTRODUCTION
The project is construction of water pipe Carrying Bridge Under the smart integrated infrastructure master plan & detailed
project Report for Phase-II Infrastructure Works for Amaravati capital city. The total length of the bridge is 100m. This
bridge is designed for 2 m diameter Steel pipes for water carryng purpose. Two bridges contains 3 simply supported
spans of having length 37m,37m and 26m @ Ch:2+528 & 37mx4 + 22mx1 @ ch:9+130 respectively . The overall width
of the proposed bridge is 4m with clear width of 3.6m. The superstructure comprises of one PSC girders, with cast in-situ
RCC deck slab on top. At deck slab level pedestal and saddle is provided for pipe.The superstructure is supported on
ELASTOMERIC bearings.
This design note deals with the design of superstructure (PSC T girder), Deck Slab & End Cross Girder. Following loads
have been considered for the analysis:
(a) Self wt. of the girder & load of deck slab
(b) Superimposed Dead Load which includes parapet wall, pedestal, pipe & water
(c) Temperature Load due to non linear temperature rise/fall
The superstructure is analyzed longitudinally in two stages. First stage analysis is carried out for ‘girder alone’ section,
simply supported, with non-composite precast post-tensioned beam properties, for self weight of girder and self-weight of
cast-in-situ deck slab with cross-girders.
g In the second stage,
g when the deck slab gains
g strength,
g the section properties
for the composite girder and deck slab are considered and global Grillage Analysis of the deck has been carried out for
finding out the distribution of loads from SIDL.
The design of Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall are also presented in this design note.
References Codes:
1. IRC: 6-2014
2. IRC: 112-2011
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'20
18
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
p
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
1.0 GENERAL
Superstructure has been idealised as simply supported independent T beams for self wt & weight of deck slab and
composite Section for SIDL. Computation of Section properties of beam alone and beam and in situ slab composite
Section are done below. The bending moment, shear force are computed subsequently.
SECTION PROPERTIES
Overall Span (C/C spacing of exp. joint) 37.000 m
Effective Span (C/C spacing of Bearing) = 34.600 m
No. of Longitudinal Girders = 1.000
C/C spacing of Cross Girder = 34.600 m
Thickness of End Cross Girder (Except Pin/Guide location) = 0.500 m
Thickness of End Cross Girder (Pin/Guide location) = 0.500 m
Is Int. X Girder provided ? (Press '1' for yes, '0' for no.) = 0
Thickness of Intermediate Cross Girder, if provided = 0.0 m
Distance between C/L of Brg. and C/L of Exp. Joint = 1.200 m
Transverse Cantilever length for Outer Girder = 2.000 m
Depth of Outer T-Girder = 2.600 m
Depth of Inner T-Girder = 2.600 m
Thickness of Deck slab = 0.225 m
Distance from C/L of bearing for uniform web near support = 1.800 m
Length of portion with variable web thickness = 2.500 m
Grade of Concrete of Deck Slab = 40 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Deck Slab Concrete = 3.33E+04 Mpa
Grade of Concrete of Girder = 50 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity of Girder Concrete = 3.52E+04 Mpa
Age of concrete for girder at transfer (1st Stage Stressing) = 28 days
Maturity of concrete for girder at transfer = 100 %
Strength of girder concrete at the time of transfer = 50.00 Mpa
Age of girder at the time of Casting of deck slab = 35 days
Maturity of girder at the time of Casting of deck slab = 100 %
Age of girder at the time of casting of SIDL = 90 days
Maturity of girder at the time of casting of SIDL = 100 %
Precast Girder Length = 35.400 m
Span Length (c/c temp. support) for Girder during erection 34.600
Distance between C/L of Brg. and C/L of Temporary Support 0.000 m
2.600 0.300
2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay2
2.600 0.800
2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay2
p
Section Properties of Girder
2
Area ΣA = 2.1143 m
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Yb =Σ(A.y) / ΣA = 1.3197 m
4
Moment of inertia of end intermediate girder (Iz) = Σ(Io+A.y2)-ΣA.Y2 = 1.22152 m
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'20
18
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
p
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
2
Area 1.9896 m Yb = 1.8885 m YtS = 0.9365 m
4 3
IZ = 1.9186 m Zb = 1.0160 m ZtS = 2.0486 m3
YtG = 0 7115
0.7115 m
ZtG = 2.6964 m3
B. Section Properties of Girder at the Span
2
Area 1.1375 m Yb = 1.2712 m Yt = 1.3288 m
4 3 3
IZ = 0.9030 m Zb = 0.7103 m Zt = 0.6795 m
2
Area
A 9664 m
2.9664
2 Yb = 1.7198
1 7198 m YtS = 1.1052
1 1052 m
4 3
IZ = 2.4033 m Zb = 1.3974 m ZtS = 2.1745 m3
YtG = 0.8802 m
ZtG = 2.7303 m3
D. Section Properties of Girder at the Support
2
Area 2.1143 m Yb = 1.3197 m Yt = 1.2803 m
4 3 3
IZ = 1.2215 m Zb = 0.9256 m Zt = 0.9541 m
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'20
18
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
p
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
B. AT SUPPORT, GIRDER
Distance of cg of Composite Section from bottom fibre (Yb) = 1.720 m
Distance of cg of Composite Section from top of Deck (Yt) = 1.105 m
AREA Y A.Y
S. No. COMPONENT
(m2) (m) 3
(m )
1 Deck Slab 0.852 0.993 0.846
2 Rctangular top Flange 0.150 0.805 0.121
3 Triangular top Flange 0.004
0 004 0.716
0 716 0.003
0 003
4 Web 0.550 0.344 0.189
Composite Section ΣΑ 1.556 ΣA.Y 1.159
2.0
2 STAAD MODEL
STAAD
S SPACE
START
S JOB IN
NFORMATION
ENGINEER
E DAT
TE 28-Aug-1
18
END
E JOB INFO
ORMATION
PAGE
P LENGTH 10000000
INPUT
I WIDTH 79
UNIT
U METER MTON
M
JOINT
J COORDI
INATES
1 0 0 0; 2 1.2 0 0; 3 2 0 0; 4 3 0 0; 5 5.5 0 0; 6 9.85 0 0; 7 14.175 0 0; 8 18.5
5 0 0; 9
22.825
2 0 0; 10 27.15 0 0; 11 31.5
5 0 0; 12 3
34 0 0; 13 35
3 0 0; 14 35.8 0 0; 15
1 37 0 0; 16 1.2 0
1.25;
1 17 1.2
2 0 -1.25; 18 35.8 0 1.25;
1 19 35
5.8 0 -1.25;
; 20 0 0 2; 21 1.2 0 2;
2 22 2 0 2
2; 23 3 0
2;
2 24 5.5 0 2; 25 9.85
5 0 2; 26 14.175
1 0 2; 27 18.5 0 2; 28 22.82
25 0 2; 29 27.15 0 2; 30 31.5
0 2; 31 34 0 2; 32 35 0 2; 33 35
5.8 0 2; 34 37 0 2; 35
5 0 0 -2; 36
6 1.2 0 -2;
; 37 2 0 -2; 38 3 0
-2;
- 39 5.5 0 -2; 40 9.
.85 0 -2; 41
4 14.175 0 -2; 42 18.
.5 0 -2; 43
3 22.825 0 -2; 44 27.15 0 -2;
45
4 31.5 0 -2
2; 46 34 0 -2; 47 35 0 -2; 48 35
5.8 0 -2; 49
9 37 0 -2; 50 1.3 0 0;
; 51 6 0 0; 52 11 0
0;
0 53 16 0 0;
0 54 21 0 0; 55 26 0 0; 56 31 0 0; 57 35.7
7 0 0;
MEMBER
M INCID
DENCES
1 1 2; 2 2 50; 3 3 4; 4 4 5; 5 5 51; 6 6 52;
5 7 7 53; 8 8 54; 9 9 55; 10 10
1 56; 11 11 12; 12
12
1 13; 13 13
1 57; 14 14 15; 15 17
7 2; 16 2 1
16; 17 19 14;
1 18 14 1
18; 19 35 36;
3 20 36 37; 21 37
38;
3 22 38 39
9; 23 39 40
0; 24 40 41;
; 25 41 42; 26 42 43; 27 43 44; 28 44 45; 29
2 45 46; 3
30 46 47;
31
3 47 48; 32
2 48 49; 33
3 20 21; 34 21 22; 35 22 23; 36 23 24; 37 2
24 25; 38 25
2 26; 39 26 27; 40
27
2 28; 41 28
2 29; 42 29 30; 43 30
0 31; 44 31
1 32; 45 32
2 33; 46 33
3 34; 47 35 1; 48 1 20; 49 36
17;
1 50 16 21; 51 37 3;
; 52 3 22; 53 38 4; 5
54 4 23; 55 39 5; 56 5 24; 57 40
0 6; 58 6 25; 59 41
7;
7 60 7 26; 61 42 8; 62
6 8 27; 63 43 9; 64 9 28; 65 44 10; 66 10 29; 67 45 11;
1 68 11 30;
3 69 46
12;
1 70 12 31; 71 47 13
3; 72 13 32
2; 73 48 19
9; 74 18 33;
; 75 49 15;
; 76 15 34; 77 50 3; 78 51 6;
79
7 52 7; 80 53 8; 81 54
5 9; 82 55 10;
83
8 56 11; 84
4 57 14;
DEFINE
D MATER
RIAL START
ISOTROPIC
I CO
ONCRETE
E 3.468e+006
6
POISSON
P 0.15
5
DENSITY
D 2.5
ALPHA
A 1e-005
5
Document Noo: D
Date:
B&S ENGIINEERING CONSULTANT
C TS PVT. LTD
D.
BSEC
C/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep
p’ 2018
Prroject: SMAR
RT INTEGRAATED INFRASSTRUCTUREE MASTER PL LAN
AN ND DETAILE ED PROJECTT REPORTS FOR
F PHASE--II Prepaared Checked R
Rev.
IN
NFRASTRUC CTURE WORK KS FOR/AT AMARVATI
A C
CAPITAL CIITY
Sttructure:
DE ESIGN OF PSSC T GIRDER
R SUPERSTR
RUCTURE, DECK
D SLAB, END
E Sattyam S
SKJ R0
CR ROSS GIRDE ER & PARAP
PET WALL
END
E DEFINE MATERIAL
M
CONSTANTS
C
MATERIAL
M CON
NCRETE ALL
MEMBER
M PROPE
ERTY AMERIC
CAN
1 TO 3 12 TO
O 14 77 84 PRIS AX 1.9
9896 IX 0.001 IY 0.102
2 IZ 1.9186
5 TO 10 78 TO
T 83 PRIS AX 1.1375 IX
I 0.001 IY 0.0366 IZ 0.903
4 11 PRIS AX
X 1.5636 IX
X 0.001 IY 0.0693
0 IZ 1.411
*****COMPOSI
* ITE
1 TO 3 12 TO
O 14 77 84 PRIS AX 2.9
9664 IX 0.001 IY 1.302
2 IZ 2.4033
5 TO 10 78 TO
T 83 PRIS AX 2.1143 IX
I 0.001 IY 1.2856 IZ 1.2215
4 11 PRIS AX
X 2.5404 IX
X 0.001 IY 1.2692
1 IZ 1.8124
19
1 TO 48 75 76 PRIS AX
X 0.0001 IX 0.0001 IY 0.0001 IZ 0.0001
0
15
1 TO 18 49 50 73 74 PRIS
P YD 0.22
25 ZD 1.6
51
5 52 71 72 PRIS YD 0.225 ZD 0.9
53
5 54 69 70 PRIS YD 0.225 ZD 1.75
5
55
5 56 67 68 PRIS YD 0.225 ZD 3.42
25
57
5 58 65 66 PRIS YD 0.225 ZD 4.33
375
59
5 TO 64 PRI
IS YD 0.225
5 ZD 4.325
SUPPORTS
S
17
1 PINNED
19
1 FIXED BUT
T FX MX MY MZ
16
1 FIXED BUT
T FZ MX MY MZ
18
1 FIXED BUT
T FX FZ MX MY MZ
LOAD
L 1 WT OF
F GIRDER
MEMBER
M LOAD
2 13 77 84 UNI
U GY -4.9
974
5 TO 10 78 TO
T 83 UNI GY
G -2.84375
3 TRAP GY -4
4.974 -3.90
0888
12
1 TRAP GY -3.90888
- -4
4.974
4 TRAP GY -3
3.90888 -2.84375
11
1 TRAP GY -2.84375
- -3
3.90888
1 UNI GY -4.
.974 0.8
14
1 UNI GY -4
4.974 0 0.4
4
LOAD
L 2 WT OF
F SLAB + DI
IAPHRAGMS
MEMBER
M LOAD
15
1 TO 18 UNI
I GY -2.324
4
FLOOR
F LOAD
YRANGE
Y 0 0 FLOAD
F -0.57
7 XRANGE 0 37
3 ZRANGE -2 2 GY
LOAD
L 3 LOADT
TYPE None TITLE WT OF
F PARAPET
MEMBER
M LOAD
1 TO 14 77 TO
T 84 UNI GY
G -0.061
19
1 TO 46 UNI
I GY -0.579
95
LOAD
L 4 LOADT
TYPE N TITLE WT OF
F PEDESTAL+PIPE+SADDLE
E+WATER
Document Noo: D
Date:
B&S ENGIINEERING CONSULTANT
C TS PVT. LTD
D.
BSEC
C/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep
p’ 2018
Prroject: SMAR
RT INTEGRAATED INFRASSTRUCTUREE MASTER PL LAN
AN ND DETAILE ED PROJECTT REPORTS FOR
F PHASE--II Prepaared Checked R
Rev.
IN
NFRASTRUC CTURE WORK KS FOR/AT AMARVATI
A C
CAPITAL CIITY
Sttructure:
DE ESIGN OF PSSC T GIRDER
R SUPERSTR
RUCTURE, DECK
D SLAB, END
E Sattyam S
SKJ R0
CR ROSS GIRDE ER & PARAP
PET WALL
JOINT
J LOAD
51
5 TO 56 FY -24.7
50
5 57 FY -17
7.8
LOAD
L 5 LOADT
TYPE None TITLE WIND
MEMBER
M LOAD
1 TO 14 77 TO
T 84 UNI GZ
G 1.976
FLOOR
F LOAD
YRANGE
Y 0 0 FLOAD
F -0.17
76 XRANGE 0 37 ZRANGE -2 2 GY
LOAD
L 6 LOADT
TYPE None TITLE COS
JOINT
J LOAD
2 14 FY -111
1
PERFORM
P ANAL
LYSIS
PRINT
P JOINT DISPLACEME
ENTS LIST 2 14 16 TO 19
FINISH
F
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'2018
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
g of PSC T Girder for 37m Span,
Design p , Deck Slab,, End Cross Girder & Parapet
p Wall R0
SKJ
3.0 COMPUTATION OF BENDING MOMENT AND SHEAR FORCE
Summary of Bending Moments at various sections (in T.m) - Girder [unfactored]
Component Support 0.0520L 0.1243L 0.2500L 0.3750L 0.5000L
Distance From Left (m.) 0 1.800 4.300 8.650 12.975 17.300
Self Wt. Of Precast Girder 0.0 88.9 191.0 324.9 404.6 431.2
Self Wt. Of Deck Slab & c. girder 0.0 66.3 148.5 255.8 319.8 341.1
Self Wt. Of Deck Slab & c. girder - COS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL-1 (Parapet+Pedestal+Pipe+Water) 0.0 171.4 400.7 685.4 854.8 911.3
Wind load 0.0 20.5 45.8 79.0 98.7 105.3
TOTAL DESIGN B.M (t.m) 0.0 347.0 786.0 1345.1 1678.0 1789.0
4.1 Calculation of Prestressing Force & Its Effects at Various Sections of Girder
B. TENDON PARTICULARS
X0 X1 X2 X3 X4
Circular
V. Curve
Y4
Y3
Yo
ELEVATION
Zo
C.L of span
Horiz. 'S' curve
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN- Sep'2
102 018
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure:
Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
cable no. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
exit angle (rad) 0.0383 0.0383 0.1498 0.1372 0.1280 0.1145 -0.0675
Circular
exit angle (deg) 2.193 2.193 8.581 7.859 7.333 6.563 -3.865
Curve
Radius of curve 52.267 52.267 13.404 14.627 15.669 17.499 -29.667
exit angle (rad) 0.0383 0.0383 0.1498 0.1372 0.1280 0.1145 -0.0675
exit angle (deg) Circular
2.193 2.193 8.581 7.859 7.333 6.563 -3.865
Curve
Radius of curve 52.267 52.267 13.404 14.627 15.669 17.499 -29.667
exit angle (rad) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.000 0.000
exit angle (deg) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Curve in
Plan
Radius of curve 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
1
Z= ( exp )-(μΣθ+kΣx) 1.00000 0.99289 0.98251 0.95921 0.95921
Px = Po * Z (KN) 2732.90 2713.46 2685.10 2621.43 2621.43
Px1 2487.63 2507.08 2535.44 2599.11 2599.11
Σx (m) 0.000 3.570 5.570 17.570 17.570
Y (m) 0.3000 0.1633 0.1250 0.1250 0.1250
Σθ (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.03827 0.03827 0.03827
128.4
2
Z= ( exp )-(μΣθ+kΣx) 1.00000 0.99289 0.98251 0.95921 0.95921
Px = Po * Z (KN) 2732.90 2713.46 2685.10 2621.43 2621.43
Px1 2487.63 2507.08 2535.44 2599.11 2599.11
Σx (m) 0.000 9.570 11.570 17.570 17.570
Y (m) 1.7200 0.2759 0.1250 0.1250 0.1250
Σθ (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.14977 0.14977 0.14977
127.8
3
Z= ( exp )-(μΣθ+kΣx) 1.00000 0.98104 0.95256 0.94120 0.94120
Px = Po * Z (KN) 2732.9 2681.1 2603.3 2572.2 2572.2
Px1 2469.1 2520.9 2598.8 2572.2 2572.2
Σx (m) 0.000 11.570 13.570 17.570 17.570
Y (m) 2.0600 0.4630 0.3250 0.3250 0.3250
Σθ (rad) 0.00000 0.00000 0.13716 0.13716 0.13716
128.2
4
Z= ( exp )-(μΣθ+kΣx) 1.00000 0.97713 0.95079 0.94322 0.94322
Px = Po * Z (KN) 2732.9 2670.4 2598.4 2577.7 2577.7
Px1 2489.2 2551.7 2598.4 2577.7 2577.7
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN- Sep'2
102 018
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure:
Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
128.6
5
Z= ( exp )-(μΣθ+kΣx) 1.00000 0.97322 0.94848 0.94469 0.94469
Px = Po * Z (KN) 1438.37 1399.86 1364.26 1358.82 1358.82
Px1 1316.81 1355.33 1364.26 1358.82 1358.82
At Span At Support
Total Height of the girder h = 2.825 2.825 m
C.G. of Girder from bottom Y = 1.888 1.720 m
M.O.I. of the Section I = 1.919 2.403 m4
Area of the Section A = 1.9896 2.966 m2
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecd Ec = 3.52E+07 KN/m2
Coefficient of shrinkage of concrete εdiff = 0.0000504
creep factor = 0.542 (Refer Eq. 7.3)
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 2.0486 2.1745 m3
Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 2.6964 2.7303 m3
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 1.0160 1.3974 m3
h1 = 0.225 m
σ = ediff *0.542* Ec
1.0 COMPUTATION OF STRESSES DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE
4.000 m 4.000 m
1 0.225 Stress 1.000 m 1.000 m
2 -962.0 0.225 0.225
3 0.150 0.3 0.150 0.1929
Stresses
Stress due
Assuming Stress due
y to release
Height Stress b Force e Moment End to release Final Stress
Segment from top of Axial
Restrained of Moment
Force
m KN/m2 m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
1 0.225 -962.0 4.000 -865.84 0.113 0.824 -713.49 -962.04 435.18 348.28 -178.6
2 0.000 -962.0 4.0 -865.84 0.1 0.8 -713.5 -962.0 435.2 264.61 -262.3
3 0.000 0.0 1.000 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 435.18 264.61 699.8
4 0.000 0.0 0.800 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 435.18
5 0.000 0.0 0.800 0.00 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 435.18 -702.27 -267.1
-865.84 -713.49
95 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after S2 prestress t/m2 545.3 568.4 1095.1 1321.1 1628.1 1632.7
96 Stress at C.G of S2 cables after S2 prestress t/m2 634.1 681.9 1247.6 1502.7 1763.6 1750.7
97 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S1 t/m2 1258.2
98 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S2 t/m2 1401.2
99 Immediate Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2 Cables
100 Elastic Shortening Loss in S1 t 0.0
101 Elastic Shortening Loss in S2 t 0.0
102 Force in Stage 2 Prestressing Cables after ES t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
103 Av.Force in St.2 Cables after Elastic Short.Loss 0.0
104 Av. Force in S-2 Cables in UTF 0.000
105 Relaxation Loss in S2 t 0.0
106 % of Relxation Loss in 4 hours % 15.13
107 Immediate Losses in Cables
108 Losses in S1 Prestress on account of ES t 0.0
109 Losses in S2 Prestress on account of ES + RL t 0.0
Stress due to Losses in Prestress on account of E.
110 Shortening & Immediate Relaxation "P"
111 top slab stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
112 top girder stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
113 bottom stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
114 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after loss t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
115 Stress at C.G of S-2 Cables due to loss t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
116 Av. Stress at c.g of S1 cables due to loss t/m2 0.0
117 Av. Stress at c.g of S2 cables due to loss t/m2 0.0
118 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S1 t/m2 1258.2
119 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S2 t/m2 1401.2
120 St
Stress att T
Transfer
f after
ft 2nd
2 d stage
t Prestress
P t
121 top slab stress t/m2 0 0 0 0 0 0
122 top girder stress t/m2 448 407 772 531 306 327
123 bottom stress t/m2 634 682 1248 1503 1764 1751
124 OK OK OK OK OK OK
125 Losses in Cables, 35-90 days
126 % of RL Loss in S2 cables, 35-90 days % 19.55
127 % of RL Loss in S1 cables, 35-90 days % 4.70
128 Relaxation Loss in S1 cables, 35-90 days t 7.08
129 Relaxation Loss in S2 cables, 35-90 days t 0.00
130 Res. Shrinkage Strain between 35-90 days 0.000042
131 Shrinkage Loss, S1 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 7.14
132 Shrinkage Loss, S2 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 0.00
133 Res. Creep Strain between 35-90 days 0.00008
134 Creep Loss, S1 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 17.42
135 Creep Loss, S2 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 0.00
Total Loss in S1 Cables t 31.64
Total Loss in S2 Cables t 0.00
Stress due to Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2
136 Prestress on account of Creep & Shrinkage
top slab stress t/m2 -3.7 -1.2 0.4 5.8 9.5 9.9
137 top girder stress t/m2 -5.1 -3.2 -3.5 0.6 3.4 3.7
138 bottom stress t/m2 -21.5 -25.3 -48.7 -59.6 -67.2 -68.0
139 Total Stress before SIDL at 90 days
top slab stress t/m2 -4 -1 0 6 10 10
140 top girder stress t/m2 443 403 769 532 309 331
141 bottom stress t/m2 613 657 1199 1443 1696 1683
142 OK OK OK OK OK OK
143 Change of Support + SIDL Bending Moment tm 0.0 171.4 400.7 685.4 854.8 911.3
144 top slab stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 78.8 195.6 334.6 417.3 444.8
145 top girder stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 62.8 148.6 254.2 317.0 338.0
146 bottom stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 -122.7 -394.4 -674.6 -841.4 -897.0
147 Total Stress after SIDL
2
148 top slab stress t/m -4 78 196 340 427 455
149 top girder stress t/m2 443 466 917 786 626 669
150 bottom stress t/m2 613 534 804 768 855 786
151 OK OK OK OK OK OK
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
152 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after SIDL t/m2 531.6 506.0 840.6 771.8 833.7 776.1
153 Stress at C.G of S2 Cables after SIDL 612.7 533.9 804.5 768.5 855.0 785.7
154 Av. Stress at c.g of S1 cables t/m2 755.9
155 Av. Stress at c.g of S2 cables t/m2 762.1
156 Losses in Stage 1 prestress,90days to infinity
157 % Residual Relaxation Loss 62.79
158 Relaxation Loss in S1,90days to infinity t 94.57
159 Residual Shrinkage Strain at 90 days 0.00014
160 Shrinkage Loss in S1,90days to infinity t 23.42
161 Res. Creep Strain beyond 90- days 0.00022
162 Creep Loss in S1,90 days to infinity t 27.75
163 Losses in Stage 2 prestress,90days to infinity
164 % Residual Relaxation Loss 65.32
165 Relaxation Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
166 Shrinkage Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
167 Creep Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
Stress due to Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2
168 Prestress on account of CR+SH+RL
2
169 top slab stress t/m -17.2 -5.7 1.7 26.5 43.9 45.8
170 top girder stress t/m2 -23.7 -14.5 -16.3 2.5 15.8 17.2
171 bottom stress t/m2 -98.8 -116.8 -224.5 -274.4 -309.5 -313.3
172
173 Total Stress after SIDL & all Losses
174 top slab stress t/m2 -21 72 198 367 471 501
175 top girder stress t/m2 419 452 901 789 642 686
176 bottom stress t/m2 514 417 580 494 545 472
177 OK OK OK OK OK OK
190 STRESS DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE
191 top slab stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 -26.5 -26.5 -18.2 -18.2 -18.2 -18.2
192 top girder stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 63.1 63.1 71.3 71.3 71.3 71.3
193 bottom stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 -35.3 -35.3 -27.2 -27.2 -27.2 -27.2
191 Total Stress after SIDL & all Losses + Differential Shrinkage
192 top slab stress t/m2 -47 45 180 349 453 482
193 top girder stress t/m2 483 515 972 860 713 758
194 bottom stress t/m2 479 382 553 467 518 445
195 OK OK OK OK OK OK
178 LL + FPLL Bending Moment tm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
179 top slab stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
180 top girder stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
181 bottom stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
182 STRESS DUE TO TEMP RISE
183 top slab stress due to temp-rise t/m2 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4
184 top girder stress due to temp-rise t/m2 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4
185 bottom stress due to temp-rise t/m2 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4
186 STRESS DUE TO TEMP FALL
187 top slab stress due to temp-fall t/m2 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7
188 top girder stress due to temp-fall t/m2 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1
189 bottom stress due to temp-fall t/m2 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3
179 Wind Load Bending Moment tm 0.0 20.5 45.8 79.0 98.7 105.3
180 top slab stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 9.4 22.4 38.6 48.2 51.4
181 top girder stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 7.5 17.0 29.3 36.6 39.1
182 bottom stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 -14.6 -45.1 -77.7 -97.2 -103.7
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
184 Service stage check : Case 1 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Fall (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
185 Live load Factor 1.0 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
186 top slab stress t/m2 -196 -103 31 200 304 334
187 top girder stress t/m2 554 586 1044 932 785 829
188 bottom stress t/m2 305 208 379 293 345 272
189 OK OK OK OK OK OK
190 Service stage check : Case 2 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Rise (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
191 Live load Factor 1.0 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
192 top slab stress t/m2 229 322 456 625 729 759
193 top girder stress t/m2 390 423 880 768 621 666
194 bottom stress t/m2 593 497 668 582 633 560
195 OK OK OK OK OK OK
196 Service stage check : Case 3 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Fall (Leading) - Rare Combination
197 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 1.0
198 top slab stress t/m2 -295 -202 -68 101 205 235
199 top girder stress t/m2 602 634 1091 979 832 877
200 bottom stress t/m2 189 93 263 177 229 156
201 CHECK OK OK OK OK OK
202 Service stage check : Case 4 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Rise (Leading) - Rare Combination
203 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 1.0
204 top slab stress t/m2 413 506 640 809 913 943
205 top girder stress t/m2 674 706 1164 1052 905 949
206 bottom stress t/m2 670 573 744 658 710 637
207 OK OK OK OK OK OK
208 Service stage check : Case 5 : With Live Load (Leading) + Wind Load (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
209 Live load Factor 1.0 Wind Load Factor 0.6
2
210 top slab stress t/m -47 51 193 372 481 513
2
211 top girder stress t/m 483 519 982 878 735 781
212 bottom stress t/m2 479 373 526 420 460 383
213 OK OK OK OK OK OK
214 Service stage check : Case 6 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Wind Load (Leading) - Rare Combination
215 Live load Factor 0.75 Wind Load Factor 1.0
2
216 top slab stress t/m -47 55 202 387 501 534
217 top girder stress t/m2 483 522 989 889 750 797
218 bottom stress t/m2 479 367 508 389 421 342
219 OK OK OK OK OK OK
220 Service stage check : Case 1 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Fall (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
221 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 0.5
222 top slab stress t/m2 -171 -78 56 225 329 358
223 top girder stress t/m2 542 574 1032 920 773 817
224 bottom stress t/m2 334 237 408 322 374 301
225 OK OK OK OK OK OK
226 Service stage check : Case 2 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Rise (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
227 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 0.5
2
228 top slab stress t/m 183 276 410 579 683 713
229 top girder stress t/m2 578 610 1068 956 809 853
230 bottom stress t/m2 574 478 648 563 614 541
231 OK OK OK OK OK OK
232 Service stage check : Case 3 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Fall (Leading) - Frequent Combination
233 Live load Factor 0.2 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
234 top slab stress t/m2 -196 -103 31 200 304 334
235 top girder stress t/m2 554 586 1044 932 785 829
236 bottom stress t/m2 305 208 379 293 345 272
237 OK OK OK OK OK OK
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
238 Service stage check : Case 4 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Rise (Leading) - Frequent Combination
239 Live load Factor 0.2 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
2
240 top slab stress t/m 229 322 456 625 729 759
2
241 top girder stress t/m 597 630 1087 975 828 872
2
242 bottom stress t/m 593 497 668 582 633 560
243 OK OK OK OK OK OK
244 Service stage check : Case 5 : With Live Load (Leading) + Wind Load (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
245 Live load Factor 0.75 Wind Load Factor 0.5
246 top slab stress t/m2 -47 50 191 368 477 508
247 top girder stress t/m2 483 518 981 875 732 777
248 bottom stress t/m2 479 375 530 428 470 393
249 OK OK OK OK OK OK
250 Service stage check : Case 6 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Wind Load (Leading) - Frequent Combination
251 Live load Factor 0.2 Wind Load Factor 0.6
252 top slab stress t/m2 -47 51 193 372 481 513
253 top girder stress t/m2 483 519 982 878 735 781
254 bottom stress t/m2 479 373 526 420 460 383
255 OK OK OK OK OK OK
NOTE :
1. TENSION IS PERMITTED IN DECK SLAB AS WELL AS GIRDER, FOR WHICH UNTENSIONED STEEL CAN BE PROVIDED.
2. SINCE THE TENSILE STRESSES ARE WITHIN THE MODULUS OF RUPTURE OF CONCRETE, THERE IS NO NEED TO CHECK CRACK WIDTH.
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Prepared By
FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
95 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after S2 prestress t/m2 456.1 470.3 888.9 1021.8 1224.8 1215.9
96 Stress at C.G of S2 cables after S2 prestress t/m2 530.4 542.9 965.1 1122.3 1306.1 1284.1
97 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S1 t/m2 972.5
98 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S2 t/m2 1054.6
99 Immediate Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2 Cables
100 Elastic Shortening Loss in S1 t 0.0
101 Elastic Shortening Loss in S2 t 0.0
102 Force in Stage 2 Prestressing Cables after ES t 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
103 Av.Force in St.2 Cables after Elastic Short.Loss 0.0
104 Av. Force in S-2 Cables in UTF 0.000
105 Relaxation Loss in S2 t 0.0
106 % of Relxation Loss in 4 hours % 15.13
107 Immediate Losses in Cables
108 Losses in S1 Prestress on account of ES t 0.0
109 Losses in S2 Prestress on account of ES + RL t 0.0
Stress due to Losses in Prestress on account of E.
110 Shortening & Immediate Relaxation "P"
111 top slab stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
112 top girder stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
113 bottom stress t/m2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
114 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after loss t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
115 Stress at C.G of S-2 Cables due to loss t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
116 Av. Stress at c.g of S1 cables due to loss t/m2 0.0
117 Av. Stress at c.g of S2 cables due to loss t/m2 0.0
118 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S1 t/m2 972.5
119 Av. Stress at c.g of Tendon, S2 t/m2 1054.6
120 St
Stress att T
Transfer
f after
ft 2nd
2 d stage
t Prestress
P t
121 top slab stress t/m2 0 0 0 0 0 0
122 top girder stress t/m2 375 367 727 584 431 460
123 bottom stress t/m2 530 543 965 1122 1306 1284
124 OK OK OK OK OK OK
125 Losses in Cables, 35-90 days
126 % of RL Loss in S2 cables, 35-90 days % 19.55
127 % of RL Loss in S1 cables, 35-90 days % 4.70
128 Relaxation Loss in S1 cables, 35-90 days t 2.98
129 Relaxation Loss in S2 cables, 35-90 days t 0.00
130 Res. Shrinkage Strain between 35-90 days 0.000042
131 Shrinkage Loss, S1 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 7.14
132 Shrinkage Loss, S2 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 0.00
133 Res. Creep Strain between 35-90 days 0.00008
134 Creep Loss, S1 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 13.46
135 Creep Loss, S2 cables, ( 35-90 days) t 0.00
Total Loss in S1 Cables t 23.59
Total Loss in S2 Cables t 0.00
Stress due to Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2
136 Prestress on account of Creep & Shrinkage
top slab stress t/m2 -2.8 -0.9 0.3 4.3 7.1 7.4
137 top girder stress t/m2 -3.8 -2.4 -2.6 0.4 2.6 2.8
138 bottom stress t/m2 -16.0 -18.9 -36.3 -44.4 -50.1 -50.7
139 Total Stress before SIDL at 90 days
top slab stress t/m2 -3 -1 0 4 7 7
140 top girder stress t/m2 371 364 725 585 433 463
141 bottom stress t/m2 514 524 929 1078 1256 1233
142 OK OK OK OK OK OK
143 Change of Support + SIDL Bending Moment tm 0.0 171.4 400.7 685.4 854.8 911.3
144 top slab stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 78.8 195.6 334.6 417.3 444.8
145 top girder stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 62.8 148.6 254.2 317.0 338.0
146 bottom stress due to SIDL t/m2 0.0 -122.7 -394.4 -674.6 -841.4 -897.0
147 Total Stress after SIDL
2
148 top slab stress t/m -3 78 196 339 424 452
149 top girder stress t/m2 371 427 873 839 750 801
150 bottom stress t/m2 514 401 534 403 415 336
151 OK OK OK OK OK OK
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Prepared By
FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
152 Stress at C.G of S1 cables after SIDL t/m2 445.9 412.0 643.2 484.7 445.8 375.0
153 Stress at C.G of S2 Cables after SIDL 514.4 401.4 534.4 403.3 414.7 336.5
154 Av. Stress at c.g of S1 cables t/m2 481.6
155 Av. Stress at c.g of S2 cables t/m2 429.3
156 Losses in Stage 1 prestress,90days to infinity
157 % Residual Relaxation Loss 62.79
158 Relaxation Loss in S1,90days to infinity t 39.81
159 Residual Shrinkage Strain at 90 days 0.00014
160 Shrinkage Loss in S1,90days to infinity t 23.42
161 Res. Creep Strain beyond 90- days 0.00022
162 Creep Loss in S1,90 days to infinity t 17.68
163 Losses in Stage 2 prestress,90days to infinity
164 % Residual Relaxation Loss 65.32
165 Relaxation Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
166 Shrinkage Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
167 Creep Loss in S2,90days to infinity t 0.00
Stress due to Losses in Stage 1 & Stage 2
168 Prestress on account of CR+SH+RL
2
169 top slab stress t/m -9.5 -3.2 1.0 14.7 24.4 25.4
170 top girder stress t/m2 -13.2 -8.1 -9.0 1.4 8.8 9.5
171 bottom stress t/m2 -54.9 -64.8 -124.6 -152.4 -171.8 -173.9
172
173 Total Stress after SIDL & all Losses
174 top slab stress t/m2 -12 75 197 354 449 478
175 top girder stress t/m2 358 419 864 840 759 811
176 bottom stress t/m2 460 337 410 251 243 163
177 OK OK OK OK OK OK
190 STRESS DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL SHRINKAGE
191 top slab stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 -26.5 -26.5 -18.2 -18.2 -18.2 -18.2
192 top girder stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 63.1 63.1 71.3 71.3 71.3 71.3
193 bottom stress due to D. Shrinkage t/m2 -35.3 -35.3 -27.2 -27.2 -27.2 -27.2
191 Total Stress after SIDL & all Losses + Differential Shrinkage
192 top slab stress t/m2 -39 48 179 335 431 459
193 top girder stress t/m2 421 482 936 912 830 882
194 bottom stress t/m2 424 301 383 224 216 135
195 OK OK OK OK OK OK
178 LL + FPLL Bending Moment tm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
179 top slab stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
180 top girder stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
181 bottom stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
182 STRESS DUE TO TEMP RISE
183 top slab stress due to temp-rise t/m2 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4 460.4
184 top girder stress due to temp-rise t/m2 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4 -153.4
185 bottom stress due to temp-rise t/m2 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4 191.4
186 STRESS DUE TO TEMP FALL
187 top slab stress due to temp-fall t/m2 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7 -247.7
188 top girder stress due to temp-fall t/m2 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1 119.1
189 bottom stress due to temp-fall t/m2 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3 -289.3
179 Wind Load Bending Moment tm 0.0 20.5 45.8 79.0 98.7 105.3
180 top slab stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 9.4 22.4 38.6 48.2 51.4
181 top girder stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 7.5 17.0 29.3 36.6 39.1
182 bottom stress due to LL t/m2 0.0 -14.6 -45.1 -77.7 -97.2 -103.7
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Prepared By
FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
184 Service stage check : Case 1 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Fall (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
185 Live load Factor 1.0 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
186 top slab stress t/m2 -187 -100 30 187 282 311
187 top girder stress t/m2 493 553 1007 983 902 953
188 bottom stress t/m2 251 128 209 50 42 -38
189 OK OK OK OK OK OK
190 Service stage check : Case 2 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Rise (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
191 Live load Factor 1.0 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
192 top slab stress t/m2 237 324 455 612 707 736
193 top girder stress t/m2 329 390 844 820 738 790
194 bottom stress t/m2 539 416 497 339 330 250
195 OK OK OK OK OK OK
196 Service stage check : Case 3 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Fall (Leading) - Rare Combination
197 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 1.0
198 top slab stress t/m2 -287 -199 -69 88 183 212
199 top girder stress t/m2 540 601 1055 1031 949 1001
200 bottom stress t/m2 135 12 93 -66 -74 -154
201 CHECK OK OK OK OK OK
202 Service stage check : Case 4 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Rise (Leading) - Rare Combination
203 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 1.0
204 top slab stress t/m2 422 509 639 796 891 920
205 top girder stress t/m2 612 673 1127 1103 1022 1073
206 bottom stress t/m2 616 493 574 415 407 327
207 OK OK OK OK OK OK
208 Service stage check : Case 5 : With Live Load (Leading) + Wind Load (Accompanying) - Rare Combination
209 Live load Factor 1.0 Wind Load Factor 0.6
2
210 top slab stress t/m -39 54 192 359 459 490
2
211 top girder stress t/m 421 487 946 929 852 905
212 bottom stress t/m2 424 292 355 177 157 73
213 OK OK OK OK OK OK
214 Service stage check : Case 6 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Wind Load (Leading) - Rare Combination
215 Live load Factor 0.75 Wind Load Factor 1.0
2
216 top slab stress t/m -39 58 201 374 479 511
217 top girder stress t/m2 421 490 953 941 867 921
218 bottom stress t/m2 424 287 337 146 118 32
219 OK OK OK OK OK OK
220 Service stage check : Case 1 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Fall (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
221 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 0.5
222 top slab stress t/m2 -163 -76 55 212 307 336
223 top girder stress t/m2 481 542 995 971 890 942
224 bottom stress t/m2 280 157 238 79 71 -9
225 OK OK OK OK OK OK
226 Service stage check : Case 2 : With Live Load (Leading) + Temperature Rise (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
227 Live load Factor 0.75 Diff. Temp Factor 0.5
2
228 top slab stress t/m 191 278 409 566 661 690
229 top girder stress t/m2 517 578 1031 1008 926 978
230 bottom stress t/m2 520 397 478 319 311 231
231 OK OK OK OK OK OK
Document No:
Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-
Sep'2018
102
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT REPORTS Prepared By
FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall R0
SKJ
232 Service stage check : Case 3 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Fall (Leading) - Frequent Combination
233 Live load Factor 0.2 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
2
234 top slab stress t/m -187 -100 30 187 282 311
2
235 top girder stress t/m 493 553 1007 983 902 953
2
236 bottom stress t/m 251 128 209 50 42 -38
237 OK OK OK OK OK OK
238 Service stage check : Case 4 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Temperature Rise (Leading) - Frequent Combination
239 Live load Factor 0.2 Diff. Temp Factor 0.6
240 top slab stress t/m2 237 324 455 612 707 736
241 top girder stress t/m2 536 597 1051 1027 945 997
242 bottom stress t/m2 539 416 497 339 330 250
243 OK OK OK OK OK OK
244 Service stage check : Case 5 : With Live Load (Leading) + Wind Load (Accompanying) - Frequent Combination
245 Live load Factor 0.75 Wind Load Factor 0.5
246 top slab stress t/m2 -39 53 190 355 455 485
247 top girder stress t/m2 421 486 944 926 849 902
248 bottom stress t/m2 424 294 360 185 167 83
249 OK OK OK OK OK OK
250 Service stage check : Case 6 : With Live Load (Accompanying) + Wind Load (Leading) - Frequent Combination
251 Live load Factor 0.2 Wind Load Factor 0.6
252 top slab stress t/m2 -39 54 192 359 459 490
253 top girder stress t/m2 421 487 946 929 852 905
254 bottom stress t/m2 424 292 355 177 157 73
255 OK OK OK OK OK OK
NOTE :
1. TENSION IS PERMITTED IN DECK SLAB AS WELL AS GIRDER, FOR WHICH UNTENSIONED STEEL CAN BE PROVIDED.
2. SINCE THE TENSILE STRESSES ARE WITHIN THE MODULUS OF RUPTURE OF CONCRETE,, THERE IS NO NEED TO CHECK CRACK WIDTH.
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'2018
9.1 Girder Composite Section At Midspan:
1.00
0.15
0.15
Z Z
1.800
0.300
εps1 Tu1
5
εps2 0.20 0.200 Tu2
εps3 4 0.20
1 3 2
0.15 0.3 Tu3
Strain Diagram Stress Diagram
0.8
Cables
Component Cable 4 Cable 5 TOTAL
1+2+3
1 Area of Cables, As (mm2) 5625.9 1875.3 987.0 8488.2
2 C.G of cables from soffit (mm) 125 325 525
3 Total Force after friction and Slip (KN) 7768.8 2579.1 1359.6
4 Total Losses due to ES+SH+CR+REL (%) 22.1 22.1 22.1
5 Final Force in Cables, Fs (KN) 6050.9 2008.8 1058.9 9118.6
6 Prestrain in cables = Fs/(As x Es) = 0.0055 0.0055 0.0055
7 Total Force in Steel, Tu = As x fpd (KN) = 7916.4 2638.8 1388.8 11944.0
8 Depth of Cable Layer from top (d1, d2,d3) (m) = 2.675 2.48 2.28
9 Depth of n. axis from top, n1 = Tu / (b x 0.446 x fck) 0.167 m
(assuming rectangular stress block)
9 Actual neutral axis depth, n = n1/0.8 = 0.209 m
(Neutral axis is within the deck slab depth)
10 Strain in Concrete & Prestressing Steel due to bending :
εc = 0.0035
εps1 = 0.0346
εps2 = 0.0379
εps3 = 0.0412
As the moment of resistance is much higher than the ultimate moment therefore only the Outer Girder Mid Span
(Most Ciritcal Section) is considered for design check.
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'2018
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY
Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
R0
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall SKJ
10.0 DESIGN FOR ULTIMATE SHEAR & PROVISION OF SHEAR REINFORCEMENT
Outer Girder considered for design. Same reinforcement provided for Inner Girder also
A. For Girder
Location Support 0.052 L 0.124 L 0.250 L 0.375 L 0.500 L
S.no
Distance from Support 0.000 1.800 4.300 8.650 12.975 17.300
A. SHEAR FORCE & CORRESPONDING MOMENTS
2 Effect of Vertical Prestress, Vpr KN -820.2 -824.4 -776.7 -691.1 -216.2 0.0
11 fcd = 0.67 x fck / γc Mpa 22.33 22.33 22.33 22.33 22.33 22.33
12 σcp = Min. of (NED/Ac, 0.2 fcd) Mpa 4.28 4.30 4.47 4.47 4.47 4.47
16(a) Net Design Shear Force, VED KN 1445.0 1507.2 1295.6 1352.9 635.8 81.7
Document No: Date:
B&S ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. BSEC/MJ18-02/DN-102 Sep'2018
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY
Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
R0
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall SKJ
18 Outer Dia of Sheathing Duct, φ m 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.120
21 C.G of Strands from soffit, yb m 1.243 1.071 0.834 0.486 0.242 0.216
3/2 1/2
27 Vmin= 0.031 K fck Mpa 0.35 0.34 0.33 0.32 0.32 0.32
29 Area of Tension Steel, Asl mm2 8488.20 8488.20 8488.20 8488.20 8488.20 8488.20
33 Is Shear Reinforcement Reqd ? NOT REQD. NOT REQD. REQD. REQD. NOT REQD. NOT REQD.
D. CHECK FOR SHEAR CAPACITY OF SECTION AGAINST WEB CRUSHING (WITH SHEAR REINFORCEMENT)
35 Assumed angle of variable strut degrees 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8
VR,dmax =
38 KN 8870.96 8877.89 2463.18 1835.45 2027.28 2047.75
αcw.bw.z.v1.fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
SHEAR CAPACITY OF
39 KN 8871.0 8877.9 2463.2 1835.5 2027.3 2047.7
SECTION
Project: SMART INTEGRATED INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN AND DETAILED PROJECT Prepared By
REPORTS FOR PHASE-II INFRASTRUCTURE WORKS FOR/AT AMARVATI CAPITAL CITY
Rev:
Satyam
Component Structure: Checked By
R0
Design of PSC T Girder for 37m Span, Deck Slab, End Cross Girder & Parapet Wall SKJ
Min. Reinft.
Asw,min / S = ρw. bw. Sinα mm2/m 814.6 814.6 305.5 305.5 305.5 305.5
No. of Links 4 4 2 2 2 2
Design SF, VED (t)* 131.7 132.1 125.4 82.2 39.0 4.2
vRdi,max = 0.5 x ν x fcd (Mpa) 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6
Status OK OK OK OK OK OK
NOTE :
1 Effect of 'μ.σn' neglected conservatively while assessing the resistance.
2 Angle of reinforcement to the interface, 'α' is taken as 90 degrees