Bash
Bash
Bash
CHAPTER 1
The Problem
connectivity.
using new media, they may lack imagination and basic skills
skills.
defines the usage of the World Wide Web especially the young
is a fun site. In this site the user can chat, video calls,
play games, upload and share pictures and videos and can also
be usedin advertisement.
and people.
untapped.
sites.
skills, but their writing skills are not equal to those who
reader.
basic Education.
education for all and add a dimension to what has been thus
some website that are more often to visit and factors why the
that today’s children were born into and have grown up in the
and football. During the Palarong Bicol last March 15, 2015
and 1, 400 Meter Run. More and more contests and competitions
Reading.
social networking sites user are teens like high school and
2.3 Comprehension
13
exposed to the Social Networking Sites and those who were not
the study?
study.
consideration:
14
networking sites.
be more open minded of the new things around, where they can
programs with the use of ICT. This may also give bases for
DepEd. ----------------------------------
Comprehension.
However, all the four groups were given the post test
and the study does not cover any third party arguments and
District was divided into two Sectors. The first which is the
Principal I, one (1) Head Teacher II, four (4) Head Teacher-
study, the Buhi Central School and the Buhi North Central
along the provincial road from Buhi proper to Iriga City. The
rooms are being used at present and two (2) more buildings
study.
and football. During the Palarong Bicol last March 15, 2015
21
and 1, 400 Meter Run. More and more contests and competitions
Reading.
Source: https://www.google.com.ph/images
Figure 1
Map of Buhi Highlighting the Buhi Central School
23
Definition of Terms
to the sites in the internet the pupils use to visit and use,
sites.
CHAPTER 2
criminal investigation.
26
are also regarded as the top photo uploaders and web video
number worldwide.
their knowledge.
prestige.
All human beings crave social life, but not all can have time
organizations etc.)
English Proficiency
writing.
language has not been shown to differ for children and for
native-like pronunciation.
association to zero.
to them. Since the pupils are still high school pupils, the
positive way like SNS have given them some facts, trivia, and
study found out that the higher the time spent on SNSs showed
the frequency of SNSs use, since when they have SNSs, length
environment and other factors may affect the way a pupil views
learning and studying. Truly SNSs are one of the factors that
who spend more time on SNSs like Facebook spend less time in
the reason why they usually ban it during class hours. The
who used Facebook had a significant lower GPA than those who
did not use the SNSs. But the most interesting finding was
academic performance.
teachers and pupils form far flung areas of the country with
with the other schools and the division office. All children
a word processor.
generations.
up.
Central School.
Theoretical Framework
for example.
which one person teaches another what they have learned. Pask
following:
holists).
Figure 2
Conceptual Framework
Act of 2013, K-12 program, Deped memo and orders, BESRA and
Figure 3
The Conceptual Paradigm
56
CHAPTER 3
Research Design
A O1 X O2
B O3 O4
C X O5
D O6
Figure 4
Figure 5
Sampling Methods
researcher will determine those pupils who are using and not
all the number of pupils who are using and not using social
Central School.
𝑁
𝑛=
1 + 𝑁𝑒 2
Where:
N = is the population
(B) and Mercury(C) and Neptune (D). Sections Earth and Venus
are the same. With these groups are highly comparable when it
comes to gender.
Chi-Square Test.
Table 5
o e o E o e o E
Internet
Connection at 8 7.5 8 7.5 7 7.5 7 7.5 30
home
freedom
Mobile Phones 15 12 12 12 11 12 10 12 48
Total
35 35 35 35 140
63
16
14
12
F
r 10
e A
q 8 B
u
e 6 C
n D
c 4
y
2
0
Internet Connection Free hotspots Internet Shops Mobile Phones
at home
Internet Access
Figure 10
figure.
them are from Earth, 3 from Venus, 7 from Mercury, and 9 from
Neptune.
Table 6
Experimental
Control Group
Frequency Group Tabular
Total Computed X2
of use Earth Venus Mercury Neptune X2
o e o e O e o E
18
16
14
F
r 12
e Earth
q 10
Venus
u 8
e Mercury
n 6 Neptune
c
y 4
0
Once a day Twice a day Thrice a day more never
Internet Access
Figure 11
study conducted.
70
Table 7
Social Experimental
Control Group
Networking Group Tabular
Total Computed X2
sites Earth Venus Mercury Neptune X2
visited o e o e O e o E
21.026
Facebook 18 17 15 17 18 17 17 17 68
at 12
Instagram 1 1.25 2 1.25 2 1.25 0 1.25 5
Twitter 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 8 degrees
6.77
Youtube 14 12.75 13 12.75 12 12.75 12 12.75 51 of
Others 0 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 8 freedom
Total
35 35 35 35 140
71
20
18
16
F
14
r
e 12 A
q
10 B
u
e C
8
n D
6
c
y 4
0
Facebook Instagram Twitter Youtube Others
Figure 12
Neptune.
sites. It can be seen from the same table that the computed
study conducted.
76
Table 8
Experimental
Purpose of Control Group
Group Computed Tabular
visiting the Total
Earth Venus Mercury Neptune X2 X2
site
o e o E o e O e
4
Study/research 5.25 6 5.25 7 5.25 4 5.25 21 21.026 at
16
14
12
F
r 10
e A
q 8 B
u
C
e 6
n D
c 4
y
2
0
Study/research Communicate Get updated Gaming Watching Videos
Figure 13
Table 9
No. Degrees
Computed No. of Tabular Significant of
Variables of of
X2 Columns X2.05 Comparability
Rows Freedom
Access to
5.62 4 4 9 16.919 Highly Comparable
internet
Frequency of
17.50 5 4 12 21.026 Highly Comparable
use
Number of
6.77 5 4 12 21.026 Highly Comparable
sites visited
Purpose of
visiting the 11.90 5 4 12 21.026 Highly Comparable
site
80
teacher-made test.
type of test.
Table 10
Verbal
20 1-20 33.33
communication
Written
20 21-40 33.33
communication
Comprehension 20 41-60 33.33
Total
60 100%
82
happen.
shown ion Appendix D. The same set of the test was given for
1966):
Index of Difficulty = PU - PL
2
83
2 = Constant
84
Table 11
Index of Difficulty
Total
Number
Criteria Item Number Percent
of
Items
91 and above
(VE)
76 to 90
4,7,13,18,23,15,44,45,47,52,54,55 12 20%
Easy (E)
26 to 75 2,3,8,19,20,22,27,
Easy 50,56,58
11 to 25
6,9,12,24,26,32,33,35,39,42
Difficult 14 23.33%
51,53,57,59
(D)
10 and below
Very
11,25,28,30,41,60 6 10%
Difficult
(VD)
Total 60 100%
85
And six (6) of the total number of items that ranged from 10
of difficulty.
Index of Discrimination = PU - PL
Table 12
Index of Discrimination
Total
Number
Criteria Item Number Percent
of
Items
41 and
1,2,5,7,10,11,15,16,19,20,22,25,30,33
above 27 45%
35,36,39,40,45,47,48,49,50,52,54,58,60
High (H)
20 to 40
3,4,6,8,9,12,13,14,17,18,21,23,24,26,27
Moderate 33 55%
,28,29,31,32,34,37,38,41,42,43,44,46,51,53,55
(M)
56,57,59
19 and
below 0 0
Low (L)
Total 60 100%
87
test the reliability of the test, the Split – half method was
done by overseeing the test once and the results were broken
pupilsin the “odd and even” items were used in computing the
acceptable.
n = number of population
11
2(𝑟 )
2 2
𝑟= 11
1+𝑟
2 2
test, the t-test was used. Using the formula (Reyes, 1996):
𝑁−2
𝑡 = 𝑟√
1 − 𝑟2
The computed t-value was 5.478 which was higher than the
5 4.50-5.00 Excellent
3 2.50-3.49 Satisfactory
2 1.50-2.49 Fair
Study Procedure
2. Title Defense;
September
November
December
February
October
January
Activities
August
Chapter
March
April
June
July
May
1. Submission of Proposal
2. Title Defense
Chapter I and II
7. Dissemination of research
instrument
8. Retrieval Research Instrument
9. Data Collection
10. Plotting of data
11. Data illustration through figure
12. Data Presentation,
interpretation and analysis
13. Pre-Oral Defense
14. Matrix of panel's suggestion
Chapter IV and V
Figure 14
GANNT Chart for the Research Procedure
92
treatment of data:
of the items.
test given.
𝑋 − μO
𝑧= 𝑆
𝑆/√𝑛
Where:
is zero.
𝑆
= Standard error of the mean
𝑆/√𝑛
test:
94
𝑋1 − 𝑋2
𝑧=
𝑆1 2 𝑆2 2
√ +
𝑛1 𝑛2
Where:
2
∑(𝑓𝑂 − 𝑓𝑒 )2
𝑋 =
𝑓𝑒
Where:
X2 = Chi-square
Σ = Summation
fe = expected frequency
2
(∑𝑥)2
SST = ∑𝑋 −
𝑁
2
(∑𝑥1 )2 (∑𝑥2 )2 (∑𝑥3 )2 (∑𝑥4 )2 (∑𝑥5 )2
SSTr = 𝑋 = + + + +
𝑁1 𝑁2 𝑁3 𝑁4 𝑁5
CHAPTER 4
networking sites;
exposed to the Social Networking Sites and those who were not
shows that;
respondents.
Table 13
test.
Needs improvement.
101
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
Table 16
Table 17
Base from the table, the computed F-test value is 17.49 where
Table 18
Table 19
Degrees F-Value
Sum of Mean
Sources of Variation of Decision on Ha
Squares Squares Computed Tabular
Freedom
Between Groups K-1 3 582.91 194.30
between
Within Group (N-1)-(K-1) 66 355.66 5.39 36.06 5.86 and Accepted
6.17
Total N-1 70 938.57
112
Table 20
Table 21
Degrees F-Value
Sum of Mean
Sources of Variation of Decision on Ha
Squares Squares Computed Tabular
Freedom
Between Groups K-1 3 642.06 214.02
between
Within Group (N-1)-(K-1) 66 807.43 12.23 17.49 5.86 and Accepted
6.17
Total N-1 70 1449.49
Table 22
Table 23
Degrees F-Value
Sum of Mean
Sources of Variation of Decision on Ha
Squares Squares Computed Tabular
Freedom
Between Groups K-1 3.00 600.36 200.12
between
Within Group (N-1)-(K-1) 66.00 791.94 12.00 16.68 5.86 and Accepted
6.17
Total N-1 70.00 1392.30
comprehension).
deviation was 1.31 for verbal, 1.7 for written and 1.6 for
value computed in the z test was 0.26 for verbal, 1.49 for
Venus, the control group was lower than the tabular value.
than the tabular value which means that the null hypothesis
Table 24
Earth Venus
Section
Verbal Written Comprehension Verbal Written Comprehension
Number of Cases 35 35 35 35 35 35
Population Mean of
3.371 2.229 2.771 0.057 0.492 0.257
the Difference
Standard Deviation of
1.93 2.281 3.993 1.31 1.7 1.63
the Difference
Computed Z-test result 10.33 5.781 4.106 0.26 1.49 0.93
Degrees of Freedom 34 34 34 34 34 34
117
the manipulation.
Table 25
118
Table 27
performance of the two groups are not the same or not equal.
Table 28
Verbal Communication
Indicator Experimental Group Control Group
Section Mercury Neptune
Number of Cases 35 35
Population Mean of the Difference 17.03 11.26
Standard Deviation of the Difference 2.19 2.38
Computed Z-test result 10.554
Degrees of freedom 34
Tabular Z- test result at 0.05 1.664
0.025 1.990
0.01 2.374
0.005 2.639
0.001 3.416
Decision on Null Hypothesis Rejected
Significance of Difference 0.001
Table 29
Written Communication
Indicator Experimental Group Control Group
Section Mercury Neptune
121
Number of Cases 35 35
Population Mean of the Difference 15.94 9.89
Standard Deviation of the Difference 3.70 3.17
Computed Z-test result 7.346
Degrees of freedom 34
Tabular Z- test result at 0.05 1.664
0.025 1.990
0.01 2.374
0.005 2.639
0.001 3.416
Decision on Null Hypothesis Rejected
Significance of Difference 0.001
Table 30
Comprehension Communication
Indicator Experimental Group Control Group
Section Mercury Neptune
Number of Cases 35 35
Population Mean of the Difference 16.03 10.17
Standard Deviation of the Difference 2.91 3.85
Computed Z-test result 7.184
Degrees of freedom 34
Tabular Z- test result at 0.05 1.664
0.025 1.990
0.01 2.374
0.005 2.639
0.001 3.416
Decision on Null Hypothesis Rejected
Significance of Difference 0.001
in the post-test of the two groups. This means that the level
equal.
Table 31
Mean
Test No Group Mean Sd t-value p-value Remark
Diff
Ex1pre 13.54 1.98 Sig @
1(Pt-test) 3.37 10.172 3.385
Expost 16.91 1.22 1%
Mean
Test No Group Mean Sd t-value p-value Remark
Diff
1(Pt- Ex1pre 13.71 2.05 Sig @
2.23 5.711 3.385
test) Expost 15.94 1.64 1%
Table 32
Table 33
Mean
Test No Group Mean Sd t-value p-value Remark
Diff
1(Pt- Ex1pre 13.40 3.05 Sig @
2.77 4.046 3.385
test) Expost 16.17 2.55 1%
purely identical.
126
CHAPTER 5
the major findings upon which the conclusions were based. The
significantly?
pre-test?
group, who were not given such opportunity since only the
traditional method was applied. The two (2) groups were pre-
tested but all the groups (Earth, Venus, Mercury, and Neptune)
Findings
years old to 14 years old. Most of the pupils are age 12,
day with 20 pupils, more with 19 pupils and thrice a day with
6 pupils.
with 5 pupils.
with 30 pupils, research and just to get updated has the same
pupils.
130
Earth and mercury has improved after they were exposed to the
and Satisfactory for post-test for Earth and for Mercury the
are exposed with the SNS the experimental group while there
Base from the table, the computed F-test value is 17.49 where
comprehension).
deviation was 1.31 for verbal, 1.7 for written and 1.6 for
value computed in the z test was 0.26 for verbal, 1.49 for
pointers:
networking sites.
Conclusions
improvement.
highly improved.
Recommendations
in English Proficiency.