Relationship Between Rewards and Nurses' Work Motivation in Addis Ababa Hospitals
Relationship Between Rewards and Nurses' Work Motivation in Addis Ababa Hospitals
Relationship Between Rewards and Nurses' Work Motivation in Addis Ababa Hospitals
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nurses constitute the largest human resource element and have a great impact on
quality of care and patient outcomes in health care organizations. The objective of this study was to
examine the relationship between rewards and nurse motivation on public hospitals administrated by
Addis Ababa health bureau.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from June to December 2010 in 5 public hospitals
in Addis Ababa. Among 794 nurses, 259 were selected as sample. Data was collected using self-
administered questionnaire. After the data was collected, it was analysed using SPSS version16.0
statistical software. The results were analysed in terms of descriptive statistics followed by inferential
statistics on the variables.
RESULTS: A total of 230 questionnaires were returned from 259 questionnaires distributed to
respondents. Results of the study revealed that nurses are not motivated and there is a statistical
significant relationship between rewards and the nurse work motivation and a payment is the most
important and more influential variable. Furthermore, there is significant difference in nurse work
motivation based on age, educational qualification and work experience while there is no significant
difference in nurse work motivation based on gender.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that nurses are less motivated by rewards they received while rewards
have significant and positive contribution for nurse motivation. Therefore, both hospital administrators’
and Addis Ababa health bureau should revise the existing nurse motivation strategy.
KEYWORDS: Rewards, Nurses, Motivation, Public Hospitals
Nurses constitute the largest human resource of this research is to examine the relationship
element in the healthcare organizations, and have between rewards and nurse work motivation in
a great impact on the quality of care and patient hospitals administrated by Addis Ababa Health
outcomes (6), but there is a limited amount of Bureau. The study was guided by theoretical
literature in the area of relationship between framework developed by Khan, Farooq and Ullan
rewards and nurse work motivation. The objective (7) ( Fig. 1).
motivation questionnaire and he reported that a Ethical clearance was obtained from Addis Ababa
coefficient alpha that is consistently high, ranging Health Bureau ethical review committee, and
from 0.82 to 0.93(10). This suggests that the items permission to conduct the study was obtained
of the questionnaire are relatively homogeneous from Addis Ababa Health Bureau. Verbal consent
with respect to the attitude construct they measure was obtained from every one of the participants
(10) reported (11). before the data collection. Additionally, names of
Data were collected by five diploma holder participants were not used in the study and
nurses after they were provided a thorough confidentially of the respondents’ information was
training on data collection procedure. A strict maintained.
supervision was made by the researcher during the
data collection. Before data collectors delivered RESULTS
the questionnaire to respondents, they had
explained the objective of the research including A total of 230 questionnaires were returned out of
questionnaire returning date. the 290 questionnaires distributed to the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences respondents which made the response rate 80%.
(SPSS) version 16 software was used for data Most of the participants 98(43.0%) were in
analysis. Descriptive statistics was used for the age group of 20-29 and 168 (73.0%) of them
demographic information. Spearman’s correlation were females. One hundred thirty three (58.0%)
coefficient and incremental regression analysis had a diploma in nursing and over half of them
were used to determine the relationship between 132(57.0%) had a working experience of 1-5 years
rewards (payment, promotion, recognition and (Table 1).
benefits) and nurses’ work motivation.
The means for the payment, promotion, that nurses are not motivated by the payment,
recognition and benefits ranged from 1.44 to 1.53. promotion, recognition and benefit they receive.
Results of the descriptive statistics in terms of Compare to other independent variables, the mean
arithmetic mean and standard deviation show that value of payment is the lowest and this revealed
the mean values for all the variables are low. Low that nurses are more de-motivated by the payment
mean values of independent variables revealed they receive. Furthermore, Mean value for nurse
110 Ethiop J Health Sci. Vol. 22, No. 2 July 2012
work motivation is 1.41 which show that nurses Spearman’s correlation was performed to study
are not motivated overall (Table 2). the size and magnitude of the relationship between
the variables. The relationships between rewards
Table 2: Descriptive statistics of rewards and (payment, promotion, recognition and benefits)
nurse work motivation in hospitals administrated are positive and significantly related with nurses’
by Addis Ababa Health bureau, August 2010. work motivation (Table 3). Correlation coefficient
between payments and motivation (0.74) is the
Variables Mean Standard highest among the entire variables and significant
Deviation at 99% whereas recognition has a weakest
Payment 1.44 0.74 correlation (0.29) among all variables but
Promotion 1.51 0.72 significant at 95.0% (Table 3).
Recognition 1.53 0.67
Benefits 1.45 0.72
Nurse motivation 1.41 0.73
Table 3. Correlation of payment, promotion, recognition and benefits with nurse work motivation in
hospitals Administrated by Addis Ababa Health Bureau, August 2010.
Table 4: Incremental Regression of nurse work motivation, hospitals administrated by Addis Ababa Health
Bureau, August 2010.
9. Mitchell, T. Matching motivational strategies 13. Gray, B. Are California Nurses Happy?
with organizational contexts. Journal of Journal of nursing, 1991; 13(2):12-17.
organizational Behavior, 1997; 19(2): 57-63. 14. Chris A, Awobnusi A. Influence of rewards on
10. Rehman, K. A study measuring the effect of workers’ performance in health organization.
pay, promotion and training on job satisfaction Journal of Social Science, 2004; 8(1):7-12.
in the Pakistani service industry. European 15. Agyepong I, Anafi P, Asiamah E, Ansah EK,
Journal of Social Science, 2007; 5(3): 37-51. Ashon DA, Narh-Dometey C. Health worker
11. Roberts, R. Relationship between rewards, (internal customer) satisfaction and
recognition and motivation at insurance motivation in the public sector in Ghana.
company in the Western Cape. Cape Town: International Journal of Health Planning and
University of the Western Cape; 2005. Management, 2004; 19(4):319-336.
12. Cashman S, Parks C, Ash A, Hemingway D, 16. James R. Understanding Employee
Bicknell W. Physician satisfaction in a major Motivation. Journal of Extension, 1998; 36(3).
chain of Investor Owned Walk- in centres. Available at: http://www.joe.org/joe/
Health care management review, 1990;15(2): 1998june/rb3.php. Date accessed: September
47-57. 29, 2010.