The document provides guidelines for writing titles, backgrounds, literature reviews, theoretical and conceptual frameworks for research papers. It discusses:
1. Guidelines for writing titles including keeping them brief, concise and including key elements like subject matter, location and time period.
2. Steps for developing a research background including conducting preliminary research, developing a thesis statement, using sources to guide research, and identifying areas for further study.
3. Purposes of literature reviews which are to establish prior knowledge on a topic, identify agreements and disagreements, and point to directions for future research.
4. Functions of reviewing literature such as justifying a study, providing background to support findings, and identifying gaps.
The document provides guidelines for writing titles, backgrounds, literature reviews, theoretical and conceptual frameworks for research papers. It discusses:
1. Guidelines for writing titles including keeping them brief, concise and including key elements like subject matter, location and time period.
2. Steps for developing a research background including conducting preliminary research, developing a thesis statement, using sources to guide research, and identifying areas for further study.
3. Purposes of literature reviews which are to establish prior knowledge on a topic, identify agreements and disagreements, and point to directions for future research.
4. Functions of reviewing literature such as justifying a study, providing background to support findings, and identifying gaps.
The document provides guidelines for writing titles, backgrounds, literature reviews, theoretical and conceptual frameworks for research papers. It discusses:
1. Guidelines for writing titles including keeping them brief, concise and including key elements like subject matter, location and time period.
2. Steps for developing a research background including conducting preliminary research, developing a thesis statement, using sources to guide research, and identifying areas for further study.
3. Purposes of literature reviews which are to establish prior knowledge on a topic, identify agreements and disagreements, and point to directions for future research.
4. Functions of reviewing literature such as justifying a study, providing background to support findings, and identifying gaps.
The document provides guidelines for writing titles, backgrounds, literature reviews, theoretical and conceptual frameworks for research papers. It discusses:
1. Guidelines for writing titles including keeping them brief, concise and including key elements like subject matter, location and time period.
2. Steps for developing a research background including conducting preliminary research, developing a thesis statement, using sources to guide research, and identifying areas for further study.
3. Purposes of literature reviews which are to establish prior knowledge on a topic, identify agreements and disagreements, and point to directions for future research.
4. Functions of reviewing literature such as justifying a study, providing background to support findings, and identifying gaps.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19
The title
Guidelines in writing the title:
1. Generally, the title is formulated before the start of the research work. It may be revised and refined later if there is a need. 2. The title must contain; - The subject matter of the study, - The locale of the study - The population involve, and - The period when the data were gathered or will be gathered. 3. It must be broad enough to include all aspects of the subject matter studied or to be studied. Hence, the title indicates what is expected to be found inside the thesis report. 4. It must be brief and concise as possible. 5. Avoid using the terms - “An Analysis of” - “A Study of” - “An Investigation of” All these things are understood to have been done or to be done when a research is conducted. 6. If the title contains more than one line, it must be written like an inverted pyramid, all words in capital letters. Examples of a complete title: THE TEACHING OF SCIENCE IN THE HIGH SCHOOLS OF PROVINCE A AS PERCEIVED BY THE SCIENCE TEACHERS AND STUDENTS DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR 1989-1990 The contents as required by guidelines no.2: A. Subject Matter: The Teaching Science B. Locale of the Study: High School of Province A C. Population Involve: The Science and Students; and D. Period of the Study: School Year 1989-1990 A brief and concise form of the title and a better one follow: The Teaching of Science in the High Schools of Province A
It will be noted that the population, the science teachers
and students as well as the period of the study, 1989-1990, are omitted when writing the second form but they have to mention in the scope and delimitation of the study. Background of the study This part of research includes information which would focus attention on the importance and validity of the problem. It is the general orientation to the problem are. A brief rationale to justify the problem must be provided. This is the present state of knowledge regarding to the problem. The background of a research study composes of an overview of the research topic, the area being researched, and previous studies and relevant information on the topic. The purpose of this part of the research paper is to demonstrate the relevance of the research question. STEPS IN DEVELOPING A RESEARCH BACKGROUND: 1. CONDUCT PRELIMINARY RESEARCH In the beginning stages of formulating a thesis, when many issues are unclear and thought need to be solidified, and the area of the study and specific topic will help you to formulate a research question or thesis statement that will lead to more specific and relevant research, find and used the preliminary sources like books and journals and other databases. 2. READ INFORMATION AND DEVELOP A RESEARCH QUESTION You will need to take notes and keep accurate track of the sources that you used up to this point. Be sure to cite the source of the information on each note so you don’t forget where each piece of information came from should you decide to use it in your thesis or research paper. 3. WRITE A THESIS STATEMENT OR RESEARCH QUESTION Think about what you’ve read and look for issues, problems, or solutions that others have found and determine your own opinion on the issue. Write your opinion as an authoritative statement on the issue, problem or solution. 4. USE YOUR THESIS STATEMENT ND RESEARCH QUESTIONS AS GUIDE Complete your research using your thesis statement and research question as your guide. You will find relevant sources that will provide insights into your specific thesis issue or problem. Make sure that your sources provide details on the history and past researches related to your research question. 5. CREATE RELEVANT SECTIONS AS YOU WRITE THE BACKGROUND STUDY As you evaluate your research and begin to write the background study, create five separate sections that cover the key issues, more findings and controversies surroundings your thesis, as well as sections for evaluation and conclusion. 6. IDENTIFY ANY FURTHER STUDY THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE Conclude your background by identifying any further study that needs to be done in that area, or provide possible solutions to the issue that haven’t been considered before. 7. USE YOUR THESIS STATEMENT ND RESEARCH QUESTIONS AS GUIDE Complete several drafts of your work, revising and filing in information as you go. Each time that you read over your work, try to leave it better than it was before. It’s also a great idea to have someone else look it over. Selecting relevant literature and studies Literature Review- is a major part of any research and it is not undertaking for its own sake. The primary purpose of the literature review is to establish the state of current “knowledge” or agreement about our research topic. A literature review is not merely a chronicle of who wrote, what, and when but in depth examination of text to identify and investigate more critical elements where current understanding is unclear and which the new research can address. GOALS OF A LITERATURE REVIEW 1. To demonstrate a familiarity with a body of knowledge and establish credibility. A good review increases a reader’s confidence in the researcher’s professional competence, ability and background. 2. To show the path of prior research and how a current project is linked to it. A good review places a research project in a context and demonstrates its relevance by making connections to a body of knowledge. 3. To integrate and summarize what is known in an area. A good review points out areas where prior studies agree, where they disagree and where major questions remain. It also indicates the directions for future research. 4. To learn from others and stimulants new ideas. A good review identifies blind alleys and suggest hypotheses for replication and gain new insights. PURPOSES OF REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE A literature review is a comprehensive summary of previous research on a topic. - It provides insight into the theoretical and conceptual background of the study. - It helps the researcher to gather valuable data and ideas that can guide the researcher in his own research. A literature review creates a “landscape” for the reader, giving her or him a full understanding of the developments in the fields. - Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort. - Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research. - Locate your own research within the context of existing FUNCTIONS OF REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND STUDIES To convey to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on the topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses. To provide justification of the study. To have basis that will be used to support the findings of the study To identify gaps, problem and need of related. TYPES OF LITERATURE REVIEW 1. ARGUMENTATION REVIEW This form examines literature selectively in order to support an argument, deeply embedded assumption, or philosophical problem already in the literature. 2. INTEGRATIVE REVIEW A form of research that reviews, critiques and synthesizes representative literature on a topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. 3. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant research. 4. HISTORICAL REVIEW It focuses on examining research throughout period of time, often starting with the first time an issue, concept, theory phenomena emerged in the literature THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK A theoretical framework is a collection of interrelated concept, like theory but not necessarily so well worked- out. It is a guide to your research, determining what thing you will measure, and what statistical relationships you will look for. PURPOSE OF THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS 1. To test theories 2. To make research findings meaningful and generalizable. 3. To stimulate research 4. To predict and control situations IMPORTANCE OF THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK Theories are formulated to explain, predict and understand phenomena and, in many cases, to challenge and extend existing knowledge within the limits of critical bounding assumptions. Conceptual framework A conceptual framework maps out the actions required in the course of the study given his previous knowledge of other researcher’s point of view and his observations on the subject of research. PURPOSES OF CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 1. To clarify concepts and purpose relationships among concepts in a study. 2. To explain observations. 3. To provide a context for interpreting the study finding. IMPORTANCE OF CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK is important as it gives the critical, historical perspective of the topic, and indicate the gap in the research. Citation style guide REFERENCE- is an important part of a research paper. REFERENCING- is a method used to demonstrate to the readers that you have conducted a thorough and appropriate literature search and reading. 5 KINDS OF CITATION STYLE GUIDE 1. APA (AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION) It is an author/date based style. This means emphasis is placed on the author and the date of a piece of work to uniquely identify it. A. Book with One Author: - (In a reference list) King, M (2000). Wrestling with the angel: a life of Janet Frame. Auckland, New Zealand: Viking - (In text citation) (King, 2000) or King (2000) Frame… B. Course Handouts/Lecture Notes - (In a reference list) Salter, G. (2007). Lecture 3: SPLS205-07A (PowerPoint slides). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Walkato. - (In text citation) (Salter, 2007) C. Journal Article- academic/scholarly (internet only-no print version) - (In a reference list) Snell, D. & Hodgetts, D. (n.d.). The psychology of heavy metal communities and white supremacy. - (In text citation) (Snells & Hodgettes, n.d.)
D. Magazine Articles- popular/trade/general interest
- (In a reference list) Goodwin, D.K. (2002, February 4). How I caused that story. Time, 159(5), 69. - (In text citation) (Goodwin, 2002) E. Newspaper Article (Print version) - (In a reference list) Harteveit, J. (2007, December 20). Boy racers. The press,3. - (In text citation) (Hartevelt, 2007) 3. MLA (MODERN LANGUAGE ASSOCIATION) It is most often applied by the arts and humanities, particular in the USA. It is arguably the most well used of all of the citation styles. In text citations: a. If the author’s name is mention in the sentence, only cite the page number b. If the author’s name is not mention in the sentence, cite both the name and the page number. c. Font and capitalizations must match in the reference list d. Long quotations (more than three lines) should be indented. e. If you are citing more than reference at the same point in a document, separate the references with semicolon (Example: Faltado 1110; Pogoy 101) f. If the work has no author, use the title g. If two authors have the same surname, use their first initial (H. Boholano 65)
2. HARVARD REFERENCING GUIDE
It is a style of referencing, primary used by university students, to cite information sources. It is the preferred referencing style for many disciplines of study and it is an author-date referencing style. The Harvard citation style can vary in minor features such as punctuation, capitalization, abbreviation and the use of italics. In text citations are used when directly quoting or paraphrasing a source. They are located in the body of the work and contain a fragment of the full citation. Reference Lists are located at the end of the work and display full citations for sources used in the assignment. HARVARD EXAMPLES OF REFERENCES BY TYPE A. Book: Single Author Holt, DH 1997, Management Principles and practices Prentice- Hall, Sydney In text citation: (Holt 1997) B. Book: More than 3 authors Bond, WR, Smith, JT, K.L. & George, M 1996, Management of small firms, McGraw-Hill, Sydney In text citation: (Bond et al. 1996)
5. VANCOUVER REFERENCING STYLE
It is the preferred referencing style for most faculty of medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences course. Reference List in Vancouver Style: - Arrange your list chronologically - Number all references - List the first 6 authors followed by ‘et. al.’ if there are more than 6 authors - Use official abbreviations for titles of journals (if available)
4. CHICAGO STYLE CITATION
This style presents bibliography information in notes and often a bibliography. It accommodates a variety of sources. Two Basic Documentation System of Chicago: A. Notes and Bibliography B. Author-date CITING BENEFITS AND BENEFICIARIES TIPS OUTLINED WHEN CITING BENEFITS AND BENEFICIARIES: 1. List any academic beneficiaries from the research and give details on how they will benefit and how the results of the proposed research will be disseminated. 2. Specific beneficiaries might be: - Researchers in the investigator’s immediate professional circle carrying out similar or related research; - Researchers in other discipline; - Researchers in other academic institutions. 3. Describe the relevance of the research to its beneficiaries. - Identify the potentials academic impact of the proposed work; - Show how the research will benefit other researchers (this might include the methodological or theoretical advances) - Identify whether the research will produce data or materials of benefits to other researchers. Explain how these will be stored, maintained, and made available. - Explain any collaboration with other researchers and their role in the project. INSTRUCTIONS: One of the reasons why the research studies are conducted is to contribute to the understanding and explanation of why things happen in certain ways. In the cases written below, determine the value of interest and identify the beneficiaries of the research. 1. A survey on the Presidential preference of the basic sectors (farmers, fisher folk, indigenous people, laborers, and urban poor) in the 2018 election. Answer the following questions: a. What is the value of the research? Explain. b. Who are the beneficiaries? Why do you think so? 2. A study on the perception of the urban on housing programs of the government. a. What is the value of the research? Explain. b. Who are the beneficiaries? Why do you think so? 3. A study on the impact of Pantawid Pampamilyang Pilipino Program (4’s) of DSWD on urban and rural poor household. a. What is the value of the research? Explain. b. Who are the beneficiaries? Why do you think so? ASSIGNMENT: Stating the Questions/Statement of the Study: Significant of the Study: 1. Give the briefly explanation of statement of the study and significance of the study 2. State the research questions and samples. Research ethics It addresses the application of ethical principles or values to the various issues and fields of research. This includes ethical aspects of the design and conduct of research, the way human participants or animals within research projects are treated, whether research results may be misused for criminal purposes and it refers also on aspects of scientific misconduct. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH ETHICS 1. MINIMIZING THE RISK OF HARM 2. OBTAINING INFORMED CONSENT 3. PROTECTING ANONYMITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY 4. AVOIDING DECEPTIVE PRCTICES 5. PROVING THE RGHT TO WITHDRAW BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ETHICAL PRACTICE 1. INFORMED CONSENT 2. THERE SHOULD BE NO PRESSURE ON INDIVIDUALS TO PARTICIPATE 3. RESPECT INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY 4. AVOID CAUSING HARM 5. MAINTAIN ANONYMITY AND CONFIDENTIALITY 6. TAKE PARTICULAR CARE IN RESEARCH WITH VULNERABLE GROUPS PLAGIARISM It is a common (and often misunderstood) problem that is often the result of a lack of knowledge and skills. Our mission is to support the education community with a comprehensive set of resources to help students write with integrity. All of the following are considered plagiarism: a. Turning in someone else’s work as your own b. Copying word or ideas from someone else without giving credit c. Failing to put a quotation in quotation marks d. Giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation e. Changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit. f. Copying is many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on ‘fair use’ rules) TYPES OF PLAGIARISM 1. DIRECT PLAGIARISM It is the word-for-word transcription of a section of someone else’s work, without attribution and without quotation. 2. SELF-PLAGIARISM It occurs when a student submits his or her own previous work, or mixes parts of previous works, without permission from all professors involved. For example, it would be unacceptable to incorporate part of a term paper you wrote in high school into a paper assigned in a college course. 3. MOSAIC PLAGIARISM It occurs when a student borrows phrases from a source without using quotation marks, or finds synonyms for the author’s language while keeping to the same general structure and meaning of the original. 4. ACCIDENTAL PLAGIARISM It occurs when a person neglects to cite their sources, or misquotes their sources, or unintentionally paraphrases a source by using similar words, groups of words, and/or sentence structure without attribution.