Activator Testing
Activator Testing
Activator Testing
Assessment in Gonstead
Chiropractic By Mark Lopes, D.C.
Why this topic now?
Triano. Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the
site for applying manipulation. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
2013, 21:36
“Recommendation: The evidence from studies with high validity and
reliability is favorable for the use of thermography/thermometry of
the lower limb in confirming frank sciatica. The evidence from high
quality studies is unfavourable toward the use of paraspinal skin
temperature measures to locate the site of care, due to limited
reliability.”
Paraspinal Cutaneous Temperature
Assessment in Gonstead Chiropractic
Letter to the editor response:
Paraspinal skin temperature assessment rating incongruent with the data from
studies. Mark Lopes, D.C. (2013-11-27) GCSS.
“There is enough data from the studies accepted for this review that show
moderate to excellent reliability, however, that at least a conditional designation
such as ‘favorable with limitations’ or ‘unclear’ should have been given for the
paraspinal skin temperature assessment, although a ‘favorable’ rating appears
more appropriate. The noninvasive nature of the assessment, lack of an expense
burden to a patient, and a reasonable number of studies showing decent
reliability should be enough to suggest this as a favorable assessment or at least
unclear or favorable with limitations. Instrumentation thermography is close to a
gold standard for this aspect of the P.A.R.T.S. concept.”
P.A.R.T.S. (Triano)
Pain–P.
Self-reported and/or reproduction of pain through diagnostic maneuvers are spatially
related to the local presence of pathology/dysfunction.
•Asymmetry–A.
Location, motion and compliance/stiffness asymmetry.
Range of motion–R.
Disproportionate local and/or regional mobility.
P.A.R.T.S. (cont.)
No mention of temperature!
Special tests–S.
Spatially consistent neurogenic activity that demonstrates a muscular,
kinematic, vascular, or secretory response that is observable.
Hyperthermia:
Tendonitis, bursitis, fracture, arthritis, tennis elbow, acute muscle
injury, compartment syndrome, Ant. Cruciate lig surgery hx., any
inflammation.
Hypothermia:
DJD, vessel occlusion, nerve damage, RSD, Raynaud’s, avascular
tissue from wounds/burns.
Tattoos may alter it
Standards of Thermography
Previous day avoid drugs or treatment with any substance that may
alter the thermogram, or inform if you have taken them.
Avoid taking a shower or bath 1-2 hrs. before the eval.
Do not alter rest or meal habits; though in some cases, it is
preferable to not assess subject under normal conditions.
Room temperature: ideal 70 - 74ºF; critical values 65- 77°F; and
reduced humidity (35 – 40 %).
It may be infeasible to control for all factors that may affect PCT.
Be aware of all factors to properly judge the value of a positive finding.
Did patient exercise immediately prior?
Heated seats in car?
Sweat and then cool?
Overheated?
Office environment?
Proper equipment function/use?
Hair on skin?
Blemishes, surface vessels?
Rub or scratch?
PCT Asymmetry
Tilt Nervoscope?
Not likely valid
PCT Asymmetry
Theory:
Healthy: skin temp patterns will change but w/in symmetrical limits as
body adapts to environment.
Value of PCT:
Determining the mechanisms and the response to the adjustment.
History of PCT Asymmetries
in Chiropractic
Thermal readings - used in chiropractic to detect PCT asymmetries since 1920’s.
B.J. Palmer-fixed pattern of skin temp asymmetry vs adaptable and changing patterns
of symmetry.
First NCM patented in 1925.
Source of intra-professional disagreement since 1930s.
Thermeter, Nervoscope (1945-Gonstead consultant for EDL, helped define
Nervoscope’s sensitivity, parameters, and function), DermaThermograph (Kimmel,
1969), Visual Nerve Tracer (Novick, 1969), Sychrontherme, (Haldeman, 1970), Visitherm
(Stillwagon, 1984), Tytron (Titone, 1988), Modern Medical Thermography (1960s ->)
Uncertainty and lack of scientific documentation prevented their diffusion in
chiropractic.
Prof. Dr. Marcos Leal Brioschi. The history of thermography. Old concepts of the production of heat. Brazilian
Society of Thermology. PanAmerican Thermography Society Presentation.
Amman MJ. The machines and tools of Dr. Clarence S. Gonstead. Chiropactic History 2007;27(2):55-58.
PCT Stability
Johnson. Local thermal control of the human cutaneous circulation. J Appl Physiol 2010 Oct;109(4):1229–
1238.
Cutaneous vascular response to rapid local skin warming. Top: pattern of the blood flow response to local warming,
including an early transient vasodilation (axon reflex), a more sustained plateau vasodilation, and a later die-away
phenomenon. Bottom: our current understanding of the mechanisms leading to that pattern, including roles for the
endothelium and nitric oxide (NO) generation, sympathetic transmitters and co-transmitters, and warm-sensitive
afferents. NEPI, norepinephrine; NPY, neuropeptide Y
Nitric Oxide
How often?
One sided?
Stewart MS, Riffle DW, Boone WR. Computer-aided pattern analysis of temperature
differentials. JMPT 1989;12(5):345-352.
Spector B. Dynamic thermography: a reliability study. JMPT 1981;4.
Thermographic Technology
Advances
1995 vs 2011
1995 vs 2011
Regions of Interest
Status of Thermography
Thermal imaging has been used mainly for research over the last 50
years.
Literature supports a number of diseases where skin temp reflects
inflammation in underlying tissues, or increased or decreased blood flow
due to a clinical abnormality.
Thermal imaging in health care either as a diagnostic test or as
outcome measure for clinical trials.
Plaugher G, Lopes MA, Melch PE, Cremate EE. The inter and intra-examiner reliability of a
paraspinal skin temperature differential instrument. JMPT 1991;14:361-7.
Nervoscope Readings
Thermography and Nervoscope
Trial
Prospective, infrared thermography of 31 healthy students, then
blinded Nervoscope exam (“two experts”).
Attempt to generate description of thermal characteristics where a
Nervoscope reading existed.
In 5 subjects both ΔPCT methods found dysfunction at a particular
level.
Showed 0.3 to 1.1 C differential possibly related to subluxation.
Data 3D graphs were made.
Roy RA. Paraspinal cutaneous temperature modification after spinal manipulation at L5.
JMPT 2010 May;33(4):308-14.
ΔPCT L4 and L5 After Activator
Roy RA. Effects of a manually assisted mechanical force on cutaneous temperature. JMPT
2008;31:230-236
PCT Graph Activator Study
Hypotheses
Initial whitening/reddening-normal reaxn to pressure.
3 stages: whitening, reddening, edema (local axon reflex).
Antidromic relayed impulse to other sensory n. branches (Sub P, CGRP).
Mechanical stimulation of endothelium affecting the vascular system
locally.
Strong pressure or ms. spasm->vasoconstriction.
Pressure or spasm subsides->re-establish circulation.
Segmental sympathetic stimulation possible (Sato, Budgell, Pickar).
Prolonged warming might be from reduced symp tone or increased
vasodilator metabolites.
Relaxed ms. spasm after adjustment-release blood flow?
Thalamic thermoregulation reflex?
Initial local response followed by higher center normalization?
PCT Tx Difference Pain or No Pain
Tx and PCT for subjects with chronic LBP vs. no tx without chronic LBP.
Chronic LBP: n = 11, 7 males, 4 females.
Asymptomatic, no tx group: n = 10, 6 males, 4 females.
Outcomes: Oswestry and PCT prone position after 8-minute acclimation period.
Tx group: 9 instrument-based treatments over 2 weeks.
Reeval 2 weeks later for both groups.
Pre-tx Oswestry tx group: 29.8% ± 11.8%; asymptomatic group: 10.2% ± 10.6%.
Post-tx Oswestry tx group: 14.20 % ± 11.5%.
Pre-tx PCT higher in the chronic LBP group than the aymptomatic group.
Asymptomatic group PCT was stable, varying from 0.01°C to 0.02°C.
LBP group PCT varied from 0.10°C to 0.18°C.
Tx group post-tx PCT increase after the 9 visits, but not to asymptomatic group
levels.
Roy RA. Comparison of paraspinal cutaneous temperature measurements between subjects with and without
chronic low back pain. JMPT. 2013 Jan;36(1):44-50.
Thoraco-Lumbar
IVD Disease
Grossbard BP, Loughin CA, Marino DJ , et al. Medical infrared imaging (thermography) of type i
thoracolumbar disk disease in chondrodystrophic dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 2014;43:869–76.
Lumbar Disc IRT
Edeiken J. Thermography and herniated lumbar disc. Am J Roent Radiol Therapeu Nuclear Med
1968; 102:790.
Trigger Point Thermology
Diakow PR. Differentiation of active and latent trigger points by thermography. J Manipulative
Physiol Ther 15(7):439-441, 1992.
Pain and Thermal Images
Brioschi ML. Documentation of myofascial pain syndrome with infrared imaging. ACTA FISIATR
2007; 14(1): 41 – 48.
Thermography Research
Kruse. Thermographic imaging of myofascial trigger points: a follow-up study. Arch Phys Med
Rehabil 1993;73:819-823.
Thermography Research
Tuzgen S. Electrical skin resistance and thermal findings in patients with lumbar disc herniation. J
Clin Neurophys: 2010; 27(4):303-307.
IRT & Unilat. Lumbar Radiculopathy
101 ptnts w/ symptoms and signs of unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy, plus 27 normal controls. Digital
infrared thermographic imaging (DITI) of the back and lower extremities. Compared mean temperature
differences (ΔT) in 30 ROIs; abnormal thermal patterns divided into 7 regions. MRI and
electrophysiological tests were also done.
Disc herniation on MRI: 86%; 43% of patients showed electrophysiological abnormalities. On DITI, 97% of
the patients showed abnormal ΔT in at least one of the 30 ROIs, and 79% showed hypothermia on the
involved side. 78% of ptnt also showed abnormal thermal patterns in at least 1 of 7 regions. Ptnts w/ motor
weakness or lateral-type disc herniation: some correlations with abnormal DITI findings. Pain severity or
other physical or electrophysiological findings weren’t related to the DITI findings.
Skin temp change following lumbosacral radiculopathy was related to some clinical and MRI findings,
suggesting muscle atrophy. DITI, despite its limitations, might be useful as a complementary tool in the
diagnosis of unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Ra JY. Skin temperature changes in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Annals Rehab Med 2013; 37(3):355-
363.
Thermatomal Changes in CDH
DITI of 50 controls and 115 CDH ptnts - defined areas of thermatomal change in CDH C3/4, C4/5, C5/6,
C6/7 and C7/T1.
Minimal abnormal thermal diff. upper extremities: 0.1 C to 0.3 C, 99% confidence interval. If delta T was
more than 0.1 C, the anterior middle shoulder sector was considered abnormal. If delta T was more than
0.3 C, the medial upper aspect of the forearm and dorsal aspect of the arm, some areas of the palm
and anterior part of the fourth finger, and their opposite side sectors and all dorsal aspects of fingers were
considered abnormal. Other areas were considered abnormal if delta T was more than 0.2 C.
In p < 0.05,
C3/4: posterior upper back and shoulder and the anterior shoulder.
C4/5: middle and lateral aspect of the triceps muscle, proximal radial region, the posterior medial aspect of the
forearm and distal lateral forearm.
C5/6: anterior aspects of the thenar, thumb and second finger and the anterior aspects of the radial region and
posterior aspects of the pararadial region.
C6/7: posterior aspect of the ulnar and palmar region and the anterior aspects of the ulnar region and some fingers.
C7/T1: scapula and posterior medial aspect of the arm and the anterior medial aspect of the arm. The areas of
thermal change in each CDH included wider sensory dermatome and sympathetic dermatome.
There was a statistically significant change of temperature in the areas of thermal change in all CDH
patients. In conclusion, the areas of thermal change in CDH can be helpful in diagnosing the level of disc
protrusion and in detecting the symptomatic level in multiple CDH patients.
Zhang HY. Thermatomal changes in cervical disc herniations. Yonsei Med J 1999, 40(5):401-412.
Thermography, Ultrasound, TPTs
Mansholt BA. Inter-examiner reliability of the interpretation of paraspinal thermographic pattern analysis.
JCCA. 2015* Jun; 59(2): 157–164.
Nervoscope
Koprowski R. Automatic analysis of the trunk thermal images from healthy subjects and patients
with faulty posture. Comput Biol Med. 2015 Jul 1;62:110-8.
My Conclusions