03 Reference Material HMT ME302 Steady Heat Conduction PDF
03 Reference Material HMT ME302 Steady Heat Conduction PDF
03 Reference Material HMT ME302 Steady Heat Conduction PDF
ME302
Dr Ramjee Repaka
Disclaimer
• This is a reference material only and refer to the text books for
complete details
• Material has been taken from different sources and efforts have been
made to cite the relevant material
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Objectives
• Understand the concept of thermal resistance and its limitations, and develop
thermal resistance networks for practical heat conduction problems
• Solve steady conduction problems that involve multilayer plane walls
• Develop an intuitive understanding of thermal contact resistance, and
circumstances under which it may be significant
• Identify applications in which insulation may actually increase heat transfer
• Analyze finned surfaces, and assess how efficiently and effectively fins
enhance heat transfer
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Steady Heat Conduction in Plane Walls
The Fourier’s law for one-dimensional steady heat conduction through
the wall can be expressed as
Eq. (1)
That is, the temperature distribution in the wall under steady conditions is a straight
line.
Eq. (2)
The rate of heat conduction through a plane wall is proportional to the average
thermal conductivity, the wall area, and the temperature difference, but is inversely
proportional to the wall thickness.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Resistance Concept
The heat conduction through a plane wall can be rearranged as
Eq. (3)
Equation for heat transfer (Eq. (3)) is analogous to the relation for electric current flow I,
expressed as
Eq. (5)
where Re = L/e A is the electric resistance and V1 - V2 is the voltage difference across the
resistance (e is the electrical conductivity).
Thus, the rate of heat transfer through a layer corresponds to the electric current, the
thermal resistance corresponds to electrical resistance, and the temperature difference
corresponds to voltage difference across the layer.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Resistance Concept
Consider convection heat transfer from a solid surface of area As and temperature Ts to a
fluid whose temperature sufficiently far from the surface is T, with a convection heat
transfer coefficient h.
Newton’s law of cooling for convection heat transfer rate can be
rearranged as
Eq. (6)
Note: When the convection heat transfer coefficient is very large (h ), the convection
resistance becomes zero and Ts T.
That is, the surface offers no resistance to convection, and thus it does not slow down the
heat transfer process.
Eq. (8)
Eq. (10)
When Tsurr T, the radiation effect can properly be accounted for by replacing h in the
convection resistance relation (Eq. (7)) by
Eq. (11)
The thermal resistance network for heat transfer through a plane wall subjected to convection on both sides, and the
electrical analogy.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Resistance Network
Under steady conditions :
Eq. (12)
or
Eq. (13)
Eq. (14)
Once the rate of heat transfer is calculated, Eq. (14) can also be used to determine the
intermediate temperatures T1 or T2.
Adding the numerators and denominators yields
Eq. (15)
where
Eq. (16)
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Resistance Network
Note: The heat transfer area A is constant for a plane wall, and the rate of heat transfer
through a wall separating two media is equal to the overall temperature difference (T1 -
T2) divided by the total thermal resistance between the media.
Also note that the thermal resistances are in series, and the equivalent thermal resistance
is determined by simply adding the individual resistances, just like the electrical
resistances connected in series.
The rate of steady heat transfer between two surfaces is equal to the temperature
difference divided by the total thermal resistance between those two surfaces.
Another observation that can be made from Eq. (15) is that the ratio of the temperature
drop to the thermal resistance across any layer is constant, and thus the temperature
drop across any layer is proportional to the thermal resistance of the layer.
Eq. (17)
which indicates that the temperature drop across any layer is equal to the rate of heat
transfer times the thermal resistance across that layer.
Eq. (18)
The surface temperature T1 of the wall can be determined by using the thermal resistance
concept as
Eq. (19)
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Multilayer Plane Walls
Consider a plane wall that consists of two layers (such as a brick wall with a layer of
insulation).
The rate of steady heat transfer through this two-layer composite wall can be expressed
as
Eq. (20)
Eq. (21)
Eq. (22)
Eq. (23)
In reality, however, even flat surfaces that appear smooth to the eye turn out to be rather
rough when examined under a microscope, with numerous peaks and valleys.
Rc is determined experimentally.
Temperature distribution and heat flow lines along
two solid plates pressed against each other for the
case of perfect and imperfect contact.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Contact Resistance
Consider heat transfer through two metal rods of cross-sectional area A that are pressed
against each other.
Heat transfer through the interface of these two rods is the sum of
• the heat transfers through the solid contact spots (solid-to-solid conduction) and
• the gaps (conduction and/or radiation across the gaps) in the noncontact areas (which
is a major contributor to heat transfer) and can be expressed as
Eq. (24)
Eq. (25)
where
• A is the apparent interface area (which is the same as
the cross-sectional area of the rods)
• Tinterface is the effective temperature difference at the
interface A typical experimental setup for the
determination of thermal contact resistance.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Contact Resistance
The quantity hc, which corresponds to the convection heat transfer coefficient, is called the
thermal contact conductance and is expressed as
Eq. (26)
This can be answered by comparing the magnitudes of the thermal resistances of the
layers with typical values of thermal contact resistance.
E.g.: The thermal resistance of a 1-cm-thick layer of an insulating material for a unit
surface area is
Eq. (28)
Eq. (29)
Thermal contact resistance is significant and can even dominate the heat transfer for
good heat conductors such as metals, but can be disregarded for poor heat conductors
such as insulations.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Contact Resistance
Thermal contact conductance for
The thermal contact resistance can be minimized by aluminum plates with different fluids at
applying a thermally conducting liquid called a thermal the interface for a surface roughness of
10 mm and interface pressure of 1 atm
grease on the surfaces before they are pressed against
each other.
E.g.: Silicon oil
This is commonly done when attaching electronic
components such as power transistors to heat sinks.
The thermal contact resistance can also be reduced by
replacing the air at the interface by a better conducting
gas such as helium or hydrogen
Another way to minimize the contact resistance is to insert a soft metallic foil such as tin,
silver, copper, nickel, or aluminum between the two surfaces.
Experimental studies show that the thermal contact resistance can be reduced by a factor
of up to 7 by a metallic foil at the interface.
For maximum effectiveness, the foils must be very thin.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Thermal Contact Resistance
Note: The thermal contact conductance is highest (and thus the contact resistance is
lowest) for soft metals with smooth surfaces at high pressure.
Eq. (30)
Eq. (31)
where
Eq. (32)
Eq. (33)
where
Eq. (34)
and
Once the individual thermal resistances are evaluated, the total resistance and the total
rate of heat transfer can easily be determined from the relations above.
(1)
These two assumptions resulted in different resistance networks, and thus different (but
usually close) values for the total thermal resistance and thus heat transfer.
In geometries in which heat transfer occurs Differences in Rtot increase with increasing
predominantly in one direction, either |kF - kG| as multidimensional effects
approach gives satisfactory results. become more significant.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Numerical 6
A 3-m-high and 5-m-wide wall consists of long 16-cm 22-cm cross section horizontal bricks (k =
0.72 W/m·K) separated by 3-cm-thick plaster layers (k = 0.22 W/m·K). There are also 2-cm-thick
plaster layers on each side of the brick and a 3-cm-thick rigid foam (k = 0.026 W/m·K) on the inner
side of the wall, as shown below. The indoor and the outdoor temperatures are 20°C and -10°C,
respectively, and the convection heat transfer coefficients on the inner and the outer sides are h1 =
10 W/m2·K and h2 = 25 W/m2·K, respectively. Assuming one-dimensional heat transfer and
disregarding radiation, determine the rate of heat transfer through the wall.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Heat Conduction In Cylinders And Spheres
Consider steady heat conduction through a hot-water pipe.
Heat is continuously lost to the outdoors through the wall of the
pipe.
The temperature gradient in the radial direction is relatively large.
Heat transfer through the pipe is steady when the fluid Heat is lost from a hot-water pipe
to the air outside in the radial
temperatures inside and outside the pipe remain constant. direction, and thus heat transfer
from a long pipe is one-
Thus heat transfer through the pipe can be modeled as steady and dimensional.
one-dimensional.
The temperature of the pipe depends on one direction only (the radial r-direction) can be
expressed as T = T(r).
This situation is approximated in practice in long cylindrical pipes and spherical containers.
Under steady conditions, heat transfer through the pipe must be constant, = constant.
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Heat Conduction In Cylinders And Spheres
Consider a long cylindrical layer (such as a circular pipe) of inner
radius r1, outer radius r2, length L, and average thermal
conductivity k.
Assumptions:
No heat generation in the layer
The thermal conductivity is constant.
1-D heat conduction through the cylindrical layer (T(r)). A long cylindrical pipe (or
spherical shell) with specified
inner and outer surface
Fourier’s law of heat conduction for heat transfer through the temperatures T1 and T2.
cylindrical layer can be expressed as
Eq. (36)
Separating the variables in the above equation and integrating from r = r1, where T(r1)
= T1, to r = r2, where T(r2) = T2, gives
Eq. (37)
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Heat Conduction In Cylinders And Spheres
Substituting A = 2rL and performing the integrations give
Eq. (38)
since = constant.
where
Eq. (40)
is the thermal resistance of the cylindrical layer against heat conduction (i.e., the
conduction resistance).
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Heat Conduction In Cylinders And Spheres
Consider a spherical layer of inner radius r1 and outer radius r2,
average thermal conductivity k and by taking A = 4r2 and
perform the integrations in Eq. (37).
The result can be expressed as
Eq. (42)
is the thermal resistance of the spherical layer against heat conduction (i.e., the
conduction resistance).
References: Cengel and Ghajar, HMT
Incropera and Dewitt, Principles of HMT
Heat Conduction In Cylinders And Spheres
Now consider steady one-dimensional heat transfer through a
cylindrical or spherical layer that is exposed to convection on
both sides to fluids at temperatures T1 and T 2 with heat
transfer coefficients h1 and h2, respectively, as shown in the
figure.
where
Eq. (43)
Eq. (44)
Eq. (45)
Eq. (46)
• Yunus A. Cengel and Afshin Ghajar, Heat and Mass Transfer, 5th edition, McGraw-
Hill Education (India) Private Limited, 2016.
• Frank P. Incropera and David P. Dewitt, Principles of Heat and Mass Transfer, 7th
edition, Wiley India Private Limited, 2012.
• J.P. Holman, Heat Transfer, 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill College, 1996.