Apathy and Hypersomnia Are Common Features of Myotonic Dystrophy
Apathy and Hypersomnia Are Common Features of Myotonic Dystrophy
Apathy and Hypersomnia Are Common Features of Myotonic Dystrophy
com
Table 1 Demographics of myotonic dystrophy (MD) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) day tasks or activities. The questionnaire covers
groups if they were able to manage the following six
MD CMT
tasks: walk up 15 stairs, ride a bicycle, open a
jar easily, lift heavy parcels (a standard example
Sample number (n) 36 13 of four full shopping bags was given), lift them-
Mean age (y (SD)) 42.3 (12.3) 43.5 (13.6)
Age range (y) 23-68 24-69 selves out of the bath, and lift their head oV the
Male:female ratio 14:22 5:8 bed if they were lying flat on it (without turning
Mean illness duration (y (SD)) 11 (6)* 23.2 (18.3)* on the side). This was then used to group
Maternal:paternal inheritance† 12:20 7:6
Mean years of schooling (SD) 11.8 (1.3) 11.2 (1.3) patients into mild (one to two negative replies),
NART IQ scores (range) 106 (78-120) 105 (80-120) moderate (three to four negative replies), and
* Mann-Whitney U; p = 0.037.
severe (five to six negative replies). The age of
NART IQ scores of patients with MD are repeated in Rubinsztein et al.17 onset of the muscle weakness and or myotonia
† It could not be determined from the family history of four patients if their illness was inherited was obtained. This correlates broadly with tri-
from the maternal or paternal side. plet repeat size.2 33 and therefore provides an
DiVerences between age, IQ, and years of schooling were non-significant with a t test for the first
two sets of data and Mann-Whitney U test for years of schooling. indirect measure of the degree of disability.
For genetic analysis, CTG triplet repeat sizes
asked to elicit other medical conditions, were determined using Southern analysis.33
current medication, schooling, and employ- Statistical analysis was performed using the
ment record. SPSS-PC software package (SPSS Inc, Chi-
The Maudsley Hospital sleep questionnaire (J cago, Ill). Much of the data were ordinal, so
D Parkes, personal communication) was used to non-parametric statistics were used.
assess sleep patterns. This questionnaire elicits
symptoms about the main sleep disorders and Results
contains the Epworth sleepiness scale.27 Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics
The following psychopathology rating scales of the myotonic dystrophy and Charcot-Marie-
were used: Tooth disease groups. These groups had similar
(1) Apathy evaluation scale28—the clinician mean ages, male:female ratios, years of educa-
rated and self rated versions of this scale were tion, and IQ levels. Other cognitive data from the
administered. This is an 18 item questionnaire patients with myotonic dystrophy have been
in which there are four options per question on reported separately.17 In the myotonic dystrophy
a continuum. The higher the score the greater group, 22 patients had mild disability (61%),
the apathy. The validity and reliability (internal seven (19%) moderate, and seven (19%) severe.
consistency, test-retest, and interrater) of these In the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease group five
apathy scales have been established.28 (39%) patients had mild disability, seven (54%)
(2)Fatigue questionnaire29—a 13 item moderate, and one (8%) severe. The degree of
graded and self rated questionnaire which is disability in the myotonic dystrophy and
divided into physical and mental symptoms Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease groups were not
relating to fatigue was given. significantly diVerent. CTG expansions in the
(3) The schedule for aVective disorder and myotonic dystrophy cases ranged from 0.3–4.6
schizophrenia-lifetime version (SADS-L) was kb (fig 1). The age of onset of the patients with
used.30 myotonic dystrophy was as follows: no patients
General intelligence was rated using the with age of onset under 10 years, five patients
National adult reading test.31 (14%) between the ages of 10–17, 20 patients
Muscle power was assessed using the MRC (56%) between the ages of 18–39, 10 patients
United Kingdom scale.32 There was no estab- (28%) aged 40 and above; one subject had no
lished test of functional disability available for clinical manifestations but had DNA confirma-
patients with peripheral nerve or muscle weak- tion of myotonic dystrophy.
ness and therefore a scale was devised which
assessed muscle functioning by asking about APATHY
the ability of the patients to undertake day to Significantly higher apathy scores were found in
the myotonic dystrophy group than in the
14 Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease group. Even
when the two patients with current diagnoses of
12 depression (and high apathy scores) were
excluded from these calculations, the difference
10 in apathy scores remained significant (Mann-
Whitney U test, p=0.0001—self rated and
Subjects (n)
20 DEPRESSION
A current diagnosis of major depression was
found in two of 36 (5.6%) patients with
myotonic dystrophy and in none of the patients
Cases (%)
15
with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (diVerence
not significant, table 2). The current point
10 prevalence for major depression in cases of myo-
tonic dystrophy is similar to that in the large epi-
demiological survey of Weissman and Myers,35
5 who also used the SADS-L (÷2=0.13, p=0.72).
Fifteen of 36 (42%) patients with myotonic
dystrophy and four of 13 (31%) patients with
0
17 22 27 32 37 42 47 52 57
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease met the research
diagnostic criteria (RDS)30 for “probable or
Apathy rating
definite lifetime history of major depression”
Figure 2 Clinician rated version of the apathy evaluation scale28 using patients with (there was no significant diVerence between
myotonic dystrophy (black bars) and patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (striped
bars). the two groups, table 2). Lifetime depression
ratings in myotonic dystrophy showed a trend
and 0.52 respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). towards being raised in the myotonic dystrophy
Apathy did not correlate with either mental or group compared with the data of Weissman
physical fatigue scores suggesting that “apathy” and Myers.35 When our data were subdivided
is a separate entity from fatigue. by sex, women with myotonic dystrophy
showed increased lifetime depression scores
HYPERSOMNIA
compared with these epidemiological data.
This trend was not found in men (table 2).
Fourteen patients with myotonic dystrophy
Depression was often temporally related to
(39%) met minimal diagnostic criteria for
divorce or separation, and less commonly
idiopathic “hypersomnolence”.34 However, in
followed diagnosis or worsening of the illness.
the presence of myotonic dystrophy, the hyper-
In four of 15 patients with myotonic dystrophy
somnolence cannot be considered truly idi-
the onset of depression predated the onset of
opathic. In addition, two patients with myot-
the myotonia or muscle weakness and in only
onic dystrophy had symptoms of sleep apnoea
four patients was there a recurrent history of
as well as being hypersomnolent. One has had
major depressive episodes. There was no
this diagnosis subsequently confirmed by sleep
apparent excess of the following psycho-
studies and is receiving treatment. The other pathologies in myotonic dystrophy: alcohol
patient refused investigation. None of the misuse (two of 36), generalised anxiety (two of
patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 36), labile personality disorder (one of 36),
had hypersomnia although five complained of intermittent depressive disorder (one of 36),
secondary insomnia (secondary to cramps in and minor depressive episode (two of 36).
their legs). The myotonic dystrophy group Some patients had more than one diagnosis
(excluding two patients with sleep apnoea and during their lifetime using RDC rules.30
two depressed patients) were compared with
the Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease group (from
Discussion
which we excluded the cases with secondary
Myotonic dystrophy is generally thought of as a
insomnia). Significantly more patients with
neurological disease with the main emphasis
myotonic dystrophy had hypersomnia (Fisher’s
placed on the characteristic progressive myo-
exact test, p=0.03). In the hypersomnolent
tonia and muscle weakness. In this study we
group there was only one pair of siblings; the
have focused on the psychopathological fea-
rest were unrelated.
tures and abnormal sleep patterns associated
Functional disability was more pronounced
with myotonic dystrophy. We think that these
in the hypersomnolent compared with the
aspects of myotonic dystrophy are important for
non-hypersomnolent cases with myotonic dys-
three main reasons. Firstly, if they are found to
trophy (Mann Whitney U test, two tailed,
be a significant part of the phenotype then this
p=0.0027). However, the presence of hyper-
knowledge will help people with myotonic dys-
somnolence in myotonic dystrophy did not
trophy and their families to understand their
correlate significantly with apathy scores, dura-
problems better. Secondly, some of these
tion of illness, age, or CTG repeat length
associated problems may be amenable to treat-
Table 2 Current and lifetime depression rates of patients with myotonic dystrophy (MD) ment and thus lead to an improved quality of
and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease using SADS-L life. Thirdly, if a specific psychopathology can
be shown to be the direct consequence of the
Population controls35
MD (n=36) CMT (n=13) (n=511) myotonic dystrophy mutation (as opposed to
being, for example, secondary to muscle weak-
Current depression 2 0 22
Lifetime depression (all) 15* 4 136* ness), there is the potential for investigating the
Lifetime depression (women) 12** 3 98** molecular biological basis for that psychopa-
Lifetime depression (men) 3 1 38 thology. Thus we think that it is important to
* ÷2 = 3.81; p = 0.056; ** ÷2 = 3.91; p = 0.048. investigate and quantify psychopathology in
All other comparisons of MD cases with either CMT or population controls were non-significant. genetic diseases in which it has been anecdotally
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on February 6, 2018 - Published by group.bmj.com
reported. Our data suggest that apathy and concludes that the hypersomnolence seen was
hypersomnolence are common and independ- not explicable purely in terms of sleep apnoea
ent features of myotonic dystrophy. alone but is due to a disturbance in central
Our study design was constrained by practi- sleep regulation. Hypersomnolence is likely to
cal considerations. Firstly, the investigator see- be an independent feature to apathy in
ing the patients was not blinded to their myotonic dystrophy, as the hypersomnolent
diagnosis. This is not an easy problem to over- patients did not have greater levels of apathy
come, as many patients with myotonic dystro- than the non-hypersomnolent group. In five of
phy have characteristic facies. However, the 13 cases, hypersomnolence seemed to predate
SADS-L30 is a structured interview, which will the onset of muscle involvement and in another
reduce interviewer bias, and apathy and hyper- five cases occurred at the same time as these
somnolence were assessed with questionnaires peripheral features, suggesting that this symp-
completed by the study patients. Secondly, 10 tom is unlikely to be secondary to general or
of the 36 patients with myotonic dystrophy respiratory muscle weakness (which tends to
were first degree relatives and psychopathology occur late in the illness). There was greater
may be familial. However, this does not alter functional disability in the hypersomnolent
our findings of the relation between having group, so hypersomnolence may follow the
myotonic dystrophy and the presence of apathy course of the illness more closely in the later
and hypersomnolence. It would only give rise phase, or may be independently associated with
to a spurious interpretation if the increased the extent of the disability.
apathy and hypersomnolence were due to the Subjects with myotonic dystrophy show
inheritance of a gene closely linked to the myo- increased apathy compared both to patients
tonic dystrophy protein kinase gene and coseg- with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and litera-
regating with it, or if these features were ture controls. The mean (SD) of the clinician
strongly determined by common familial envi- rated apathy score for patients with myotonic
ronmental factors. Both of these seem unlikely. dystrophy was 38.4 (10.4) and for the patients
Thirdly, although this is one of the largest with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 23.7 (4.4).
series of patients with myotonic dystrophy The mean scores (SD) reported previously in
examined for psychopathology, the sample size the following groups are: normal elderly
is not large enough to confidently exclude sample 26 (6.2), left hemispheric stroke 31.9
eVects where no significant correlations or (9.6), right hemispheric stroke 34.7 (7.3),
associations were detected. In addition, we Alzheimer’s disease 44.4 (11.1), and major
have specifically excluded patients with con- depression 40.5 (9.7) (one of the sets of
genital disease, who are more likely to have clinician rated scores from Marin et al.28 )
larger CTG expansions. As the points at the Our ascertainment of patients on the basis of
extremes have greater weight in correlation DNA records has ensured the inclusion of
analyses, the paucity of severe cases may have patients with milder symptomatology, who may
diminished our ability to relate psychopathol- previously have gone unnoticed. This has, in
ogy to severity of disease or CTG repeat length. part, allowed us to conclude that apathy is not
The low current prevalence rates of depres- simply a feature of the severely aVected patients
sion in patients with myotonic dystrophy (two with myotonic dystrophy. As the Charcot-
of 36) are very diVerent to those found by Marie-Tooth disease group did not have
Brumback et al.25 who found current depres- apathy, we concluded that apathy is not a gen-
sion in 100% of their patients. This may be eral secondary psychological reaction related to
accounted for in part by the milder degree of having a chronic genetic disease causing
functional disability in our patients. The diVer- muscle weakness. The very limited number of
ence in lifetime depression rates in patients patients with myotonic dystrophy showing
with myotonic dystrophy versus the epidemio- major depression when interviewed, mitigate
logical control group were only of borderline against explaining apathy simply as part of a
significance in women. This sample may not depressive syndrome.
have shown significance for men because of the The symptom of apathy is seen commonly in
fewer men seen. Other than the one patient patients with a frontal lobe syndrome and these
with postnatal depression who was excluded at patients perform poorly on executive function
the request of her clinician, there seemed to be tasks. In myotonic dystrophy there are conflict-
no bias against selection of patients with ing reports about frontal lobe tasks being
depression. aVected. Whereas some11 12 38 39 found frontal
Hypersomnia is a common and disabling lobe tasks such as the Wisconsin card sorting
symptom in myotonic dystrophy. About one test or the verbal fluency test to be aVected,
third of patients with myotonic dystrophy have others20 40 report diVerences of borderline
sleep disorders.36 In the general population significance or no deficits. This discrepancy
3.7%-4.2% describe hypersomnolence.37 may be due to the exclusion of congenital
Thirty nine per cent of our patients met crite- cases.20 This is particularly relevant as execu-
ria for “idiopathic hypersomnolence” and a tive function tests are particularly sensitive to
further 6% had both sleep apnoea and low intelligence. We have compared patients
hypersomnolence. A recent study on those with with myotonic dystrophy with normal age and
myotonic dystrophy referred to a sleep disor- IQ matched controls17 on three tests of execu-
ders clinic reported that 14 of 22 (63.6%) were tive function—namely, a verbal fluency task,
hypersomnolent but did not fulfil criteria for the modified Wisconsin card sorting test,41 and
sleep apnoea (although both diagnoses were the cognitive estimates test.42 Patients with
present in a further three patients).24 This study myotonic dystrophy were not significantly
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on February 6, 2018 - Published by group.bmj.com
aVected on the first but results reached border- frequent appearance in myotonic dystrophy. Clin Neu-
ropathol 1994;13:134–8.
line significance (p=0.053 and p=0.047) on the 9 Avrahami E, Katz A, Bornstein N, et al. Computed
second two tests. These findings, combined tomographic findings of brain and skull in myotonic
dystrophy J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:435–8.
with the apathy we documented, are consistent 10 Glantz RH, Wright RB, Hackman MS, et al. Central
with frontal lobe involvement. In addition, this nervous system magnetic imaging findings in myotonic
dystrophy. Arch Neurol 1988;45:36–8.
hypothesis is supported by pathological find- 11 Abe K, Fujimura H, Toyooka K, et al. Involvement of the
ings involving the frontal lobes4 and frontal central nervous system in myotonic dystrophy. J Neurol Sci
1994;127:179–85.
hypoperfusion on SPECT.13 12 Huber SJ, Kissel JT, Shuttleworth EC, et al. Magnetic reso-
Apathy has been found and quantified in nance imaging and clinical correlates of intellectual impair-
ment in myotonic dystrophy. Arch Neurol 1989;46:536–40.
other neuropsychiatric disorders—for exam- 13 Chang L, Anderon T, Migneco OA, et al. Cerebral
ple, in patients with Parkinson’s disease,43 cer- abnormalities in myotonic dystrophy: cerebral blood flow,
magnetic imaging and neuropsychological tests. Arch Neu-
ebrovascular disease,28 44 and Alzheimer’s rol 1993;50:917–23.
disease.28 Although little is known about the 14 Fiorelli M, Duboc D, Mazoyer BM, et al. Decreased cerebral
glucose utilisation in myotonic dystrophy. Neurology
neurochemistry of myotonic dystrophy, it is 1992;42:91–4.
interesting to consider whether there may be 15 Harper PS. Congenital myotonic dystrophy in Britain. Arch
Dis Child 1975;50:505–13.
common mechanisms underlying apathy in 16 Turnpenny P, Clark C, Kelly K. Intelligence quotient profile
myotonic dystrophy and other disorders. in myotonic dystrophy, intergenerational deficit and correla-
tions with CTG amplifications. J Med Genet 1994;31:300–5.
Marin23 suggested that a common neurochemi- 17 Rubinsztein JS, Rubinsztein DC, McKenna PJ, et al. Mild
cal basis underlies some disorders presenting myotonic dystrophy is associated with memory impairment
in the context of normal general intelligence. J Med Genet
with apathy. For instance, a functional defi- 1997;3:229–33.
ciency of dopaminergic systems may explain 18 Bird TD, Follett C, Griep E. Cognitive and personality
function in myotonic dystrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg
the apathy seen in neuroleptic induced aki- Psychiatry 1983;46:971–80.
nesia, the negative symptoms in schizophrenia, 19 Ambrosini PJ, Nurnberg HG. Psychopathology: a primary
feature of myotonic dystrophy. Psychosomatics 1979;20:
and the apathy in subcortical dementias such 393–9.
as Parkinson’s disease and frontal lobe 20 Palmer BW, Boone KB, Chang L, et al. Cognitive deficits in
personality patterns in maternally versus paternally inher-
syndromes.23 However, he has argued that this ited myotonic dystrophy. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1994;16:
simple model is unlikely to explain apathy in 784–95.
21 Brumback RA, Carlson KM. Psychiatric disorder in myoto-
other disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease, in nia [letter]. Biol Psychol 1983;18:603.
which there is damage to the hippocampus, 22 Caughey JE, Myrianthopoulos NC. Dystrophia myotonica and
related disorders. Springfield Ill: Charles C Thomas, 1963.
amygdala, and contiguous structures. The role 23 Marin RS. Apathy: a neuropsychiatric syndrome. J Neu-
of the amygdala and closely related temporal- ropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1991;3:243–54.
diencephalic subsystems in apathy is suggested 24 Van der Meche FGA, Bogaard JM, van der Sluys RJ, et al.
Daytime sleep in myotonic dystrophy is not caused by sleep
by the Kluver-Bucy syndrome in monkeys.45 apnoea. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:626–8.
In conclusion, we think that apathy and 25 Brumback RA, Carlson KM, Wilson H, et al. Med
Hypotheses 1981;7:1059–6.
hypersomnia may be CNS features of the myo- 26 Raeymackers P, Timmerman V, Nelis E, et al. Duplication in
tonic dystrophy mutation. Apathy in these chromosome 17p 11.2 in Charcot Marie Tooth neuropathy
type 1a (CMT 1a). Neuromuscul Disord 1991;1:93–7.
patients did not correlate with hypersomno- 27 Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness:
lence or functional disability. In addition, most the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540–5.
28 Marin RS, Biedrzycki RC, Firinciogullari S. Reliability and
patients did not have clinical depression when validity of the apathy evaluation scale. Psychiatry Res 1991
interviewed and therefore the high apathy 38:143–62 .
29 Wessely S, Powell R. Fatigue syndromes: a comparison of
levels in the group as a whole cannot be chronic “postviral” fatigue with neuromuscular and aVective
explained in these terms. Although myotonic disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989;52:940–8.
30 Endicott J, Spitzer RL. A diagnostic interview—the
dystrophy is considered primarily as a schedule for aVective disorders and schizophrenia. Arch
neurological disease, we think that apathy and Gen Psychology 1978;35:837–44.
31 Nelson HE. The national adult reading test (NART).
hypersomnia are integral parts of the disease Windsor: NFER- Nelson, 1982.
and reflect CNS involvement. These features of 32 Medical Research Council of the UK. Aids to the examination
of the peripheral nervous system. Palo Alto: Pendragon
the illness impair quality of life and should be House,1978.
considered as they may be treatable. 33 Harley HG, Rundle SA, MacMillan JC, et al. Size of the
unstable CTG repeat sequence in relation to phenotype
and parental transmission in myotonic dystrophy. Am J
This research project was undertaken during a research post on Hum Genet 1993;52:1164–74.
the Cambridge Psychiatric Training Scheme. Funding was 34 Thorpy MJ. International classification of sleep disorders. Diag-
received from Lifespan Community NHS Trust and Merck- nostic and coding manual. Diagnostic Classification Steering
Lipha Research prize for Psychiatry. We acknowledge all the Committee. Rochester, MN: American Sleep Disorders
participating patients and their general practitioners, the gener- Association, 1990.
ous assistance of the Medical Genetics Department, Adden- 35 Weissman MM, Myers JK. AVective disorders in a US
brooke’s Hospital and Mr D Dow, Dr C Walsh, Professor RS urban community. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:1304–11.
Marin, Dr J Sussman, and Dr GE Berrios. Special thanks to Mrs 36 Parkes JD. Sleep and its disorders. Philadelphia: WB Saun-
R Patterson for secretarial assistance. ders, 1985.
37 Guilleminault C. Disorders of excessive sleepiness. Annals of
1 Wieringa B. Commentary: myotonic dystrophy reviewed: Clinical Research 1985;17:209–219.
back to the future? Hum Mol Genet 1994;3:1–7. 38 Woodward JB, Heaton RK, Simon DB, et al. J Clin
2 Hunter A, Tsilfidis C, Mettler G, et al. The correlation of Neuropsychology 1982;4:335–42.
age of onset with CTG trinucleotide repeat amplification in 39 Censori B, Danni M, DelPesce M, et al. Neuropsychological
myotonic dystrophy. J Med Genet 1992;29:774–9. profile in myotonic dystrophy. J Neurol 1990;237:251–6.
3 Harper PS. Myotonic dystrophy. London: WB Saunders, 1979. 40 Malloy P, Mishra SK, Adler SH. Neuropsychological
4 Rosman NP, Kakulas BA. Mental deficiency associated with deficits in myotonic dystrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychia-
myotonic dystrophy: a neuropathological study. Brain try 1990;53:1011–3.
1966;89:769–87. 41 Nelson HE. A modified card sorting test to frontal defects.
5 Culebras A, Feldman RG, Meak FB. Cytoplasmic inclusion Cortex 1976;12:313–24
bodies within neurones of the thalamus in myotonic 42 Shallice T, Evans ME. The involvement of the frontal lobes
dystrophy. A light and electron microsopic study. J Neurol in cognitive estimation. Cortex 1978;14:294–303.
Sci 1973;19:319–29. 43 Starkstein SE, Mayberg HS, Preziosi TJ, et al. Reliability,
6 Wisniewski HM, Berry K, Spiro AJ. Ultrastructure of the validity and clinical correlates of apathy in Parkinson’s dis-
thalamic neuronal inclusions in myotonic dystrophy. J ease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1992;4:134–9.
Neurol Sci 1975;24:321–9. 44 Starkstein SE, FederoV JP, Price TR, et al. Apathy following
7 Ono S, Inoue K, Mannen T, et al. Neuropathological cerebrovascular lesions. Stroke 1993;24:1625–30.
changes in the brain in myotonic dystrophy: some new 45 Rolls ET. Connections, functions and dysfunctions of limbic
observations. J Neurol Sci 1987;81:301–20. structures, the prefrontal cortex and hypothalamus. In: M
8 Oyanagi K, Ogawa H, Nakajima T. Rod-like intracytoplas- Swash, C Kennard eds. Scientific basis of neurology.
mic inclusions in large neurons of the caudate nucleus in Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1985:201–13.
Downloaded from http://jnnp.bmj.com/ on February 6, 2018 - Published by group.bmj.com
These include:
References This article cites 37 articles, 10 of which you can access for free at:
http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/64/4/510#ref-list-1
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up in the
service box at the top right corner of the online article.
Notes