Discriminating Taste Treat: Stephen Ham
Discriminating Taste Treat: Stephen Ham
Discriminating Taste Treat: Stephen Ham
Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part Two: Kasparov vs. Karpov 1975-
1985, by Garry Kasparov, 2008 Everyman Chess, Figurine Algebraic
Notation, Hardcover, 424pp., $45.00.
Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part Two: Kasparov vs. Karpov 1975-
1985 recounts in detail all 76 games played between these two chess
titans (possibly the strongest players in history) during that period, while
also providing deep contextual and autobiographical material.
Play through and download
the games from Kasparov and Karpov played almost 200 games against each other in the
ChessCafe.com in the careers. Many of these games were subsequently annotated by each
DGT Game Viewer. protagonist independently. In addition to the 76 finely annotated games in
Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part Two: Kasparov vs. Karpov 1975- My Great Predecessors
The Complete 1985, we’re treated to highly informative commentary from “behind the Part 5
DGT Product Line scenes.” This commentary includes discussion of the ubiquitous politics by Garry Kasparov
involved with such high-level matches. It also provides character
development of the people who were involved, autobiographical data, and
the thoughts and perceptions of Garry Kasparov – both contemporary
with the events described, and after the passage of time.
Kasparov has an introduction to each game and some are quite detailed
and lengthy. One of my favorite stories is part of the lead-in to Garry’s
very first battle against Karpov. Garry was then a member of the Baku
Young Pioneers team that was competing against Karpov’s Chelyabinsk
team. The format of such matches involves the grandmaster from each
team playing a simultaneous exhibition against the young players from
the opposing team. The year was 1975 and Karpov was 24 and already
world champion, while Kasparov was just 12. How Life Imitates Chess
by Garry Kasparov
“…that first meeting with Karpov did not provoke in me the same
trepidation as the game with Tal. But the other lads in my team were
nervous and they went along to the game as though they were already
lost. In the foyer of the hotel, where the tournament was being held, I
said: ‘What are you afraid of? Karpov is the world champion, but even he
can make a mistake.’ Apparently these words were overheard, and the
following day one of Karpov’s backers, the secretary of the local regional
party committee Tupikin, said to my mother: ‘Bear in mind: Karpov is
unforgiving.’”
What ominous words to say to the mother of a twelve-year old! But, this
sets the almost paranoid tone for subsequent anti-Kasparov politics, the
dirty deeds, and the shenanigans documented throughout the book. These
exist in such quantity that one almost suspects Kafka of being the book’s
“ghost writer.”
Karpov quickly established a 4-0 lead in just the first nine games, but
their next 17 games were draws. Karpov won again in game 27. So, a lop-
sided match victory for Karpov seemed inevitable – the score was now 5-
0. Many experts predicted a 6-0 whitewash.
The next sentence in the book sets the stage for the controversial match
climax: “It was not only Karpov who might have remembered Baguio –
Campomanes, Sevastyanov, and Baturinsky were also there. It was then
that the idea occurred to them of terminating the match.”
Kasparov won the next game, making the score 5-3. On page 247, a
prophetic quote of from Botvinnik is cited. “There are three possibilities
of how the match will end. The first, and least likely, is that Karpov will
after all win the single game he needs and will remain champion. The
second, and more likely, is that Kasparov will win another three games
and become the champion. And the third possibility is that the match will
simply be stopped. The third possibility is the most likely, because the
second possibility is more likely than the first.”
At this point in the match, before the start of Game 49, Kasparov took a
timeout. Things then unraveled swiftly. First, FIDE president
Campomanes declared a time-out, and then terminated the entire match!
Several “official” reasons were given for the match truncation, but the
primary reason cited was the health of both players. Yet, both players
publicly claimed they wanted to continue, although Karpov had visibly
lost a lot of weight. So, was the matched stopped against the wishes of
both players, or was one player’s public declaration a sham?
In any event, the termination of their first world championship match led
to a rematch in Moscow, later in 1985. Kasparov eventually triumphed in
this back-and-forth struggle by winning the twenty-fourth and final game,
as black. So, at the age of 22, Garry Kasparov became the youngest world
champion in history. The games and commentary for that match are also
presented thoroughly in this wonderful book.
So, where does Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part Two: Kasparov
vs. Karpov 1975-1985 fit into the overall collection of Kasparov’s chess
output? This is not immediately clear. Garry sets thing straight in his
interview however, noting that this is the first of three books that will deal
with his games with Karpov.
All games in Garry Kasparov on Modern Chess, Part Two: Kasparov vs.
Karpov 1975-1985 have some lead-in commentary or some post-game
commentary, or both. And the games themselves are annotated in great
detail, with at least the same level of analytical depth and quality, plus
verbal commentary, as seen in the previous volumes of My Great
Predecessors. Volume V of that series discussed Karpov’s games in the
section entitled “Anatoly the Twelfth.” None of the K-K games appeared
in that volume, however.
Note that Chess Informants #39 and #40 offer these same match games,
annotated either by Karpov or Kasparov. But the annotations of these
games in this book are vastly deeper and more thorough…and they’ve
been checked by computer engines. Plus, we have the benefit of
Kasparov’s narratives here, an aspect always absent in the Informant’s
language-less format.
As with all Everyman Chess books I’ve seen, Garry Kasparov on Modern
Chess, Part Two: Kasparov vs. Karpov 1975-1985 is published in
“British” English and usage. It has occasional typos, but is generally well
prepared.
Ken Neat seems to be the “go-to man” for Everyman Chess when they
want to translate Russian into English. But translators also end up being
writers since direct translations usually result in the same gibberish we
see from computer translations. But as a book reviewer, I’ve seen several
examples where Neat’s English leaves a great deal to be desired. Here,
the translated prose isn’t too bad – sometimes just awkward. It’s on par
with the writing seen in the My Great Predecessors series.