Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 268 views

    Problem 5-4 West Sparkle Material Balance

    Uploaded by

    Charles Pabane
    1. 78% of the original gas-in-place (OGIP) of 1,328 Bcf can be recovered at an abandonment pressure of 1000 psia. 2. Based on a pressure survey after 1.7 Bsm3 of production, the apparent OGIP is 1.23 Bsm3. This is lower than the volumetric estimate of 1.328 Bcf (37.62 Bsm3), possibly due to rock compaction reducing the effective pore volume. 3. The material balance calculations using the actual production data indicate a lower remaining p/z and apparent OGIP than estimated volumetrically, suggesting some reservoir compression has occurred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Problem 5-4 West Sparkle Material Balance

    Uploaded by

    Charles Pabane
    268 views3 pages
    1. 78% of the original gas-in-place (OGIP) of 1,328 Bcf can be recovered at an abandonment pressure of 1000 psia. 2. Based on a pressure survey after 1.7 Bsm3 of production, the apparent OGIP is 1.23 Bsm3. This is lower than the volumetric estimate of 1.328 Bcf (37.62 Bsm3), possibly due to rock compaction reducing the effective pore volume. 3. The material balance calculations using the actual production data indicate a lower remaining p/z and apparent OGIP than estimated volumetrically, suggesting some reservoir compression has occurred.

    Original Description:

    tekres

    Original Title

    Problem 5-4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. 78% of the original gas-in-place (OGIP) of 1,328 Bcf can be recovered at an abandonment pressure of 1000 psia. 2. Based on a pressure survey after 1.7 Bsm3 of production, the apparent OGIP is 1.23 Bsm3. This is lower than the volumetric estimate of 1.328 Bcf (37.62 Bsm3), possibly due to rock compaction reducing the effective pore volume. 3. The material balance calculations using the actual production data indicate a lower remaining p/z and apparent OGIP than estimated volumetrically, suggesting some reservoir compression has occurred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    268 views3 pages

    Problem 5-4 West Sparkle Material Balance

    Uploaded by

    Charles Pabane
    1. 78% of the original gas-in-place (OGIP) of 1,328 Bcf can be recovered at an abandonment pressure of 1000 psia. 2. Based on a pressure survey after 1.7 Bsm3 of production, the apparent OGIP is 1.23 Bsm3. This is lower than the volumetric estimate of 1.328 Bcf (37.62 Bsm3), possibly due to rock compaction reducing the effective pore volume. 3. The material balance calculations using the actual production data indicate a lower remaining p/z and apparent OGIP than estimated volumetrically, suggesting some reservoir compression has occurred.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    Problem 5-4

    West Sparkle Material Balance


    Your asset team has selected 37.62 Bsm3 or 1,328 Bcf as the most likely value for the West
    Sparkle OGIP. Assume that rock compressibility is sufficiently low that rock compaction can be
    ignored.
    1. What fraction of the OGIP can be recovered at an abandonment pressure of 1000 psia?
    2. Assume that after 1.7 Bsm3 had been produced, a pressure survey indicated that the
    reservoir pressure was 4330 psia.
    What is the apparent value of OGIP? How does this compare with your volumetric estimate?
    What are the possible causes for any discrepancy?
    *West Sparkle Gas Properties
    During testing of the WS-2 well, a gas sample was obtained with the following composition.
    Initial pressure is estimated to be 4500 psia (31,000 kPa). Use a reservoir temperature of 180 F
    (82 C).

    Mole
    Component
    Percent
    N2 0.1490
    CO2 0.5970
    C1 91.4800
    C2 5.0060
    C3 1.6030
    i-C4 0.3470
    n-C4 0.3460
    i-C5 0.1310
    n-C5 0.0970
    C6 0.2440
    C7+ 0.0000
    TOTAL 100.0000
    Compound yi MWi yiMWi pci (psia) yipci (psia) Tci, (oR) yiTci (oR)
    C1 0.915 16.04 14.67 673 615.66 344 314.69
    C2 0.050 30.07 1.51 709 35.49 550 27.53
    C3 0.016 44.10 0.71 618 9.89 666 10.66
    i-C4 0.003 58.12 0.20 530 1.84 733 2.54
    n-C4 0.003 58.12 0.20 551 1.91 766 2.66
    i-C5 0.001 72.15 0.07 482 0.48 830 0.83
    n-C5 0.001 72.15 0.07 485 0.47 847 0.82
    C6 0.002 86.18 0.21 434 1.06 915 2.23
    C7+ 0.000 114.23 0.00 361 0.00 1024 0.00
    N2 0.001 28.02 0.04 227 0.34 492 0.73
    CO2 0.006 44.01 0.26 1073 6.41 548 3.27
    H2S 0.000 34.08 0.00 672 0.00 1306 0.00
    1.000 MWa = 17.94 ppc = 674 Tpc = 366
    gg = 0.62

    Ppr @4500 6.681045157


    Ppr @1000 1.484676702
    Ppr @4330 6.428650117
    Tpr = 1.747872834

    p z p/z Gp
    4500 0.96 4687.5 0
    0 0 0 37.62

    1. Ditanya:

    Gp G
    p z p/z
    (Bsm3) fraction
    1000 0.97 1030.93 29.34247 78%

    Volumetrik:

    p z p/z Gp
    4500 0.96 4687.5 0
    4330 0.955 4534.03 1.7

    Actual:

    p z p/z Gp
    4500 0.96 4687.5 0
    4330 0.955 4534.03 1.227677
    p/z vs Gp
    5000

    4000

    3000
    p/z

    2000 p/z vs Gp
    Linear (p/z vs Gp)
    y = -124.6x + 4687.5
    1000

    0
    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
    -1000
    Gp (Bsm3)

    p/z Vs Gp
    4700

    4680

    4660

    4640

    4620
    p/z

    Volumetrik
    4600
    Actual
    4580

    4560

    4540

    4520
    0 0.5 1 1.5 2
    Gp (Bsm3)

    You might also like