Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Report: Marking Rubric Riju - Pramod - Vinu: Page 1 of 3

    Uploaded by

    mohammad Ali
    This document provides a marking rubric for evaluating a report on lean systems in industry and comparing process improvement methodologies. It outlines criteria for ratings from A-A+ to D, assessing dimensions such as the quality of discussion, critique, comparison, organization, and writing style. For the highest ratings, the discussion must be well-supported by sources and draw clear conclusions, while lower ratings are given if the discussion relies more on opinion than evidence or is incomplete. The rubric provides detailed guidance on meeting the standards for each rating level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Report: Marking Rubric Riju - Pramod - Vinu: Page 1 of 3

    Uploaded by

    mohammad Ali
    10 views3 pages
    This document provides a marking rubric for evaluating a report on lean systems in industry and comparing process improvement methodologies. It outlines criteria for ratings from A-A+ to D, assessing dimensions such as the quality of discussion, critique, comparison, organization, and writing style. For the highest ratings, the discussion must be well-supported by sources and draw clear conclusions, while lower ratings are given if the discussion relies more on opinion than evidence or is incomplete. The rubric provides detailed guidance on meeting the standards for each rating level.

    Original Description:

    assignment

    Original Title

    assignment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a marking rubric for evaluating a report on lean systems in industry and comparing process improvement methodologies. It outlines criteria for ratings from A-A+ to D, assessing dimensions such as the quality of discussion, critique, comparison, organization, and writing style. For the highest ratings, the discussion must be well-supported by sources and draw clear conclusions, while lower ratings are given if the discussion relies more on opinion than evidence or is incomplete. The rubric provides detailed guidance on meeting the standards for each rating level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    10 views3 pages

    Report: Marking Rubric Riju - Pramod - Vinu: Page 1 of 3

    Uploaded by

    mohammad Ali
    This document provides a marking rubric for evaluating a report on lean systems in industry and comparing process improvement methodologies. It outlines criteria for ratings from A-A+ to D, assessing dimensions such as the quality of discussion, critique, comparison, organization, and writing style. For the highest ratings, the discussion must be well-supported by sources and draw clear conclusions, while lower ratings are given if the discussion relies more on opinion than evidence or is incomplete. The rubric provides detailed guidance on meeting the standards for each rating level.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Report: Marking Rubric Riju - Pramod - Vinu

    Criteria A-A+ B-B+ C -C+ E-D


    80%-100% 65% - 79% 50-64% 0-49%
    Evaluation of  Discussion is formed from the  Discussion highlights  Discussion is formed from  Discussion is based on
    lean systems in sources. The approaches are advantages, disadvantages, the sources appearing in opinion rather than 7/20
    an industry described well, using appropriate strengths, weaknesses and is the body appropriate sources.
    sources. drawn from the literature.  Attempts made to  Descriptions, critique or
     Critique highlights advantages,  Discussion is fair and thorough. compare and critique discussions are incomplete
    disadvantages, strengths, sourced information. and/or uninformed by
    weaknesses and is drawn from the suitable sources
    literature.
     Comparison is fair and thorough
    Comparison of  Discussion is formed from the  Discussion highlights  Discussion is formed from  Discussion is based on
    process sources. The approaches are advantages, disadvantages, the sources appearing in opinion rather than
    improvement described well, using appropriate strengths, weaknesses and is the body appropriate sources.
    methodologies sources. drawn from the literature.  Attempts made to  Descriptions, critique or
     Critique highlights advantages,  Discussion is fair and thorough. compare and critique discussions are incomplete
    disadvantages, strengths, sourced information. and/or uninformed by 8/20
    weaknesses and is drawn from the suitable sources
    literature. 
     Comparison is fair and thorough
    Organisation and  Uses logical structure appropriate  Shows a logical progression of  Shows a logical  Answers/paragraphs lack
    coherence to assessment tasks throughout ideas in most progression in some organisation, and coherence
     Transitional sentences develop answers/paragraphs answers/paragraphs but throughout 3.5/5
    and link ideas  Transitional sentences develop may list ideas  Uses inappropriate or no
     Paragraphs have topic sentences and link ideas, but some logical  Few transitional sentences transitional sentences
    guiding the reader through the links may be incorrect used and logical links not throughout
    chain of reasoning or progression  Topic sentences may not always clear  Topic sentences not used
    of ideas always be evident, but  Few topic sentences used. throughout. Lacks
     Assessment completed within paragraphs clearly relate to Paragraphs not always paragraphs and appropriate
    word count central ideas clear to central ideas. structure

    Lean Management Akld T3 2019


    Page 1 of 3
     Introduction and conclusion are  Assessment completed within  Assessment completed but  Assessment too brief or
    strong, clearly linked, memorable word count may be slightly brief or excessively exceeds word
    and establish focus  Introduction and conclusion exceeded word count count
     are linked and establish  Introduction and  Introduction and conclusion
    focus conclusion are adequately are not linked or focused or
    linked and attempt to are absent
    establish focus 
    Style & Technical  Chooses words for their precise  Uses words and  Uses words and  Overall sentence structure is
    (sentence meaning and uses professional/industry professional/industry too simple with non-
    structure and professional/industry appropriate appropriate language appropriate language in professional/industry
    academic style, language effectively throughout accurately and effectively in some answers/paragraphs appropriate language and
    spelling,  Sentences are varied, clearly most answers/paragraphs  Sentences generally clear style throughout 2 /5
    punctuation, structured, focused and succinct  Sentences are clear, structured and correct, but some may  Contains awkward or
    referencing and  Follows guidelines for assignment and focused be awkward and grammatically incorrect
    formatting) presentation  Follows guidelines for ineffective sentences throughout
     Almost entirely free of spelling and assignment presentation  Follows guidelines for  Does not follow guidelines
    grammatical errors  Minor spelling and grammatical assignment presentation, for assignment presentation
     Documented sources/APA errors may have minor errors  Contains many spelling and
    referencing technically correct  Documented sources/APA  Contains some spelling and grammatical errors
    throughout referencing contain very few grammatical errors  Documented sources/APA
    errors referencing absent or
    contains many errors
    Evaluation of lean systems in an industry

    In this section you have provided rather longish summaries of the case studies. Your section
    ‘comparison’ is again a synopsis of what has happened at each organisation rather than a
    comparison and evaluation.

    As discussed in class and outlined in the assignment instructions, this means you need to focus on
    how were the challenges similar/different? How did this impact the choice of solutions? Were the
    solutions similar/different? Why? Why not? Would one solution be better than the other one? How
    come?

    You also did not evaluate the impact of lean thinking on the overall operations strategy of each
    organisation.

    Also, see comments on Turnitin.

    Comparison of process improvement methodologies

    Your section 3.3 leaves your reader mostly confused and not sure if you have understood the
    concept of Six Sigma. See comments on Turnitin. Also, where is the ‘evaluation’?

    Further, I am very much struggling with your choice of sources (3.1) or lack thereof (3.2 & 3.3). See
    comments on Turnitin.

    Organisation and coherence

    See comments on Turnitin re executive summary, introduction and adding more paragraphs.

    Style & Technical

    You are quite sloppy with your referencing. Also, you must add more sources to give your
    comparison and evaluation credibility.

    Mistakes with regards to grammar, tenses, sentence structure and diction. Use ‘Grammarly’ and
    consult Glen from Studyskills for further work.

    You might also like