Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. (2009) - Encyclopedia of Communication Theor
Littlejohn, S., & Foss, K. (2009) - Encyclopedia of Communication Theor
Communication Theory
Media and Mass Communication Theories
10.4135/9781412959384.n231
Although the definition of mass communication can vary from source to source, most
definitions have similar elements. Mass communication is often described or explained
by comparing it to interpersonal communication, when a source encodes a message
and sends it to a receiver via both verbal and nonverbal messages who then decodes
the message and provides feedback. In interpersonal communication, the source
and receiver are typically individuals, the channel is typically face-to-face, and the
communication is typically private. Feedback is generally direct and immediate.
New technology, however, tends to blur the lines between traditional interpersonal
communication and mass communication. With a good computer and basic computer
skills, a single individual can publish his or her own professional looking magazine. With
the trend towards narrowcasting in the broadcast and cable industries, the audience
is becoming less anonymous and less heterogeneous. And with Internet channels
designed to show unique content, the audience can be relatively small.
There are three paradigms by which the media have been examined. The first
paradigm, called the [p. 624 ↓ ] powerful effects paradigm, viewed the media as very
strong and powerful; it governed from around the 1920s to the 1940s. Researchers felt
that the media (primarily radio and television) had a very immediate and direct impact
on audiences. The assumption was that the audience was passive and uncritical.
Research during this timeframe generally supported the powerful effects paradigm.
Perhaps the most famous large-scale examination of the media was The Payne Fund
Studies, a series of 13 studies undertaken between 1929 and 1932 that focused
on the effects of movies on young people. The results of these studies showed that
there were strong and powerful effects of viewing movies on children. However,
current researchers generally dismiss the results of these studies due to numerous
methodological errors.
The second paradigm, often referred to as the minimalist effects or the limited effects
paradigm, began in the 1940s and ended in the 1970s. Perhaps no study was more
influential in the paradigm shift from powerful effects to limited effects than one
conducted by Paul Lazarsfeld and his colleagues on the influence of the media in the
1940 presidential election. The researchers found that the mass media had little direct
influence on voting behavior and that it was interpersonal communication with others
that had a far greater influence. The media tended to reinforce existing behaviors rather
than change them. Reinforcing this paradigm, Wilbur Schramm conducted a series
of well-publicized, multiyear studies on the effects of television on children. Results
of Schramm's work showed that there is a complex relationship between children's
television viewing and subsequent behavior. He found it difficult to predict the effect of
watching television and questioned the causal relationship between watching television
and negative effects. There were many variables that would influence this relationship,
including the child's age, mental ability, and social situation.
Changes in society and in communication technology in the 1960s ushered in the third
paradigm, often called the cumulative effects paradigm. An increase in the number of
households with television, violent images of the civil rights movement, and a number
of new theories of media exposure caused a reevaluation of the perception of the
effects of media exposure. It is during this time that theories of long-term influence
such as social learning theory (social cognitive theory) and cultivation theory were
developed. Researchers no longer saw the effects of the media as limited or directed
and immediate, but they did see the effects as cumulative and powerful. It was the first
time that children had been exposed to television all their lives, and it was thought that
this constant, long-term viewing of violent or negative images would have profound
effects on viewers. This paradigm was supported by research during this time period,
and the idea of long-term, cumulative effects of mass media is generally supported
today.
Media systems dependency theory is a systems-based theory that examines the mutual
dependence between the media system, the political system, and the general public.
According to this theory, each member of the dependency triad is dependent upon
and has influence over the other two. Each has influence over the other, yet each
needs the other to exist. For example, the political system needs the media system
for information dissemination and publicity and needs the general public for legitimacy
and for votes during the election season. The general public needs the political system
for authority [p. 625 ↓ ] and structure and needs the media system for entertainment
and information. Those who examine the media from a dependency perspective argue
that any systemwide examination of the media should be examined through these
dependencies.
Agenda-setting theory attempts to explain how the general public determines the most
important issues of the day. According to agenda setting, the media do not necessarily
tell people what or how they should think about an issue. However, the media (and
specifically the news media) can influence people's perception as to what is important
to consider and talk about. The more someone sees an issue being covered in the
news, the more this person will feel this is an important issue. So the influence is not
in the direction as would be expected—from the individual to the media. It is not the
individual that sets the media agenda, it is the media coverage of an issue that sets
the public agenda. This becomes increasingly distressing given the criteria that news
organizations use to determine the newsworthiness of a story.
Spiral of silence is a theory of public opinion. The theory is based on the assumption
that people do not like to feel isolated and that society tends to isolate those with
deviant or novel positions not congruent with prevailing thought. Because we fear
isolation, we constantly assess the situation around us and the perceptions of people
with whom we interact. If our opinion is that of the dominant majority, we speak out
and give our opinion. If our opinion is deviant from the dominant majority, we are more
likely to keep our opinion to ourselves. This could eventually lead to an actual change
in our position. The spiral of silence focuses on how different or deviant opinions are
suppressed in our society.
Knowledge gap hypothesis looks at the role of and use of communication technology
in society. According to those who study this hypothesis, the general public can be split
into two segments: the information rich and the information poor. The information rich
are those of a higher socioeconomic status that tend to be wealthier, better educated,
and have greater knowledge on a variety of issues than those who are information poor.
The information rich have better access to technology and are more technologically
savvy. When a new technology is introduced, the information rich tend to acquire
information and adopt the new technology at a faster rate than the information poor.
Therefore, the gap between the two population segments tends to increase rather than
decrease. This concept is very similar to the digital divide.
Cultural imperialism typically focuses on how Western nations dominate the media
around the world and how this domination can have powerful effects on other cultures.
According to the theory, the importing of cultural products (primarily film and television)
by smaller, less-developed countries can have the unintended effect of imposing
Western values and ideology—inherently imbedded in cultural products—on the
importing country. This can then have relatively large, macrolevel effects on the host
country by Americanizing it, changing or destroying the local culture.
Critical cultural studies theories focus on the social role of mass media and how the
media can be used to define power relations among various subcultures and maintain
the status quo. Critical cultural studies researchers examine how the media relate to
matters of ideology, race, social class, and gender. The media are seen not only as a
reflection of culture, but also as cultural producers themselves. The emphasis is on how
political and social structures influence mediated communication and how this affects
power relations by maintaining or supporting those with power in our society.
Social cognitive theory, developed primarily by psychologist Albert Ban dura in the
1960s, focuses on how and why people tend to model what they see in the media.
It is a theory that focuses on our capacity to learn without direct experience. This
observational learning is dependent upon a number of things including the subject's
ability to understand and remember what he or she saw, identification with the mediated
character, and the circumstances that would lead up to the modeling of this behavior.
Social cognitive theory is one of [p. 626 ↓ ] the most often cited and examined theories
applied to the study of the media and mass communication.
Cultivation theory research began towards the end of the 1960s in reaction to the
turmoil from the civil rights and women's movements being presented in the news.
According to cultivation researchers, television is the primary storyteller in today's
society and has become the primary source of socialization for people today. Television
also presents a mainstream, homogenous view of the world. There are consistent
themes such as high levels of violence, stereotypical gender roles, and the virtual
nonexistence of the elderly that cross all program genres. The more someone watches
television, the more he or she will perceive television reality as the same as real life.
Therefore, heavy television viewers feel the world is a more dangerous place, place a
stronger emphasis on traditional gender roles, and underestimate the number of elderly
people at greater rates than light television viewers.
The elaboration likelihood model (ELM) examines the ways in which people are
persuaded. According to the ELM, there are two routes to persuasion: the central
route and the peripheral route. If persuasion takes place via the central route, critical
examination of the situation has occurred, and the best decision with the available facts
is made. For example, a student deciding whether to go to a study group or to stay
home would examine all the facts and decide that it would be better for his grade if he
attended the study group. If a peripheral route is taken, some decision rule other than
critical thinking is used. In this example, this person could be persuaded to go to a study
group because all his friends want to go to a study group. The decision rule here would
be majority rule. Little critical thinking would occur. Persuasion via the central route
tends to last longer and be more salient than persuasion via the peripheral route.
Desensitization is one of the most often cited media theories by the popular press.
According to desensitization, repeated exposure to violent or sexual images reduces
the initial negative reaction to these images, and viewers tend to eventually become
comfortable viewing those images. Viewers are no longer bothered by seeing
somebody murdered or raped on television. The fear, then, is that these viewers will
then not have the feelings of concern, empathy, or sympathy toward victims of actual
violence. Additionally, desensitized viewers may end up seeing these deviant or criminal
behaviors as normal and common.
Although research indicates that the media can play a small role in these issues, it
is clear that a number of variables can lead a person to become violent, including
the person's history, personality, upbringing, and other events that have shaped that
person's life. The media are one aspect of this complex relationship. The media,
however, are often a [p. 627 ↓ ] convenient scapegoat for those looking for an easy
answer or for something or someone to blame. Anyone knowledgeable about the effects
of media should recognize this as a fallacy and understand that the media are just part
of a large group of variables that should be examined when studying violence in society.
Summary
The definition of media and mass communication is in a state of flux. New
communication technologies are blurring the lines and altering the definitions. New
theories are being developed to address the changing nature of the media. The theories
discussed here are just a sample of the ways at which researchers try to understand the
media and their influence on our lives.
Kevin J. Pearce
10.4135/9781412959384.n231
See also
Further Readings
Hetsroni, A., Elphariach, H., Kapuza, R., and Tsfoni, B. Geographical proximity, cultural
imperialism, and the cultivation effect. Communication Monographs vol. 74 (2007). pp.
181–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637750701390077
Jeffres, T., Neuendorf, K., Bracken, G., and Atkin, D. Integrating theoretical
traditions in media effects: Using third-person effects to link agenda-setting and
cultivation. Mass Communication & Society vol. 11 (2008). pp. 470–491. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1080/15205430802375303
Nabi, R., and Clark, S. Exploring the limits of social cognitive theory: Why negatively
reinforced behaviors on TV may be modeled anyway. Journal of Communication vol. 58
(2008). pp. 407–427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00392.x