Me Mod 3 PDF
Me Mod 3 PDF
Me Mod 3 PDF
MODULE 3 ENTREPRENEUR
Topics covered:
Entrepreneur – meaning of entrepreneur, types of entrepreneurship, stages of
entrepreneurial process, role of entrepreneurs in economic development,
entrepreneurship in India, barriers to entrepreneurship.
Identification of business opportunities- market feasibility study, technical
feasibility study, financial feasibility study and social feasibility study.
Entrepreneur: An entrepreneur is an enterprising individual who builds capital through
risk and/or initiative. The term was originally a loanword from French and was first defined by
the Irish French economist Richard Cantillon. Entrepreneur in English is a term applied to a
person who is willing to help launch a new venture or enterprise and accept full responsibility
for the outcome. Jean- Baptiste Say, a French economist, is believed to have coined the word
"entrepreneur" in the 19th century - he defined an entrepreneur as "one who undertakes an
enterprise, especially a contractor, acting as intermediatory between capital and labour".
Types of entrepreneurs:
The literature has distinguished among a number of different types of entrepreneurs, for
instance:
Social entrepreneur
Lifestyle entrepreneur
A lifestyle entrepreneur places passion before profit when launching a business in order to combine
personal interests and talent with the ability to earn a living. Many entrepreneurs may be primarily
motivated by the intention to make their business profitable in order to sell to shareholders.[examples
needed]
In contrast, a lifestyle entrepreneur intentionally chooses a business model intended to develop
and grow their business in order to make a long-term, sustainable and viable living working in a field
where they have a particular interest, passion, talent, knowledge or high degree of expertise. [6] A
lifestyle entrepreneur may decide to become self employed in order to achieve greater personal
freedom, more family time and more time working on projects or business goals that inspire
them. A lifestyle entrepreneur may combine a hobby with a profession or they may specifically
decide not to expand their business in order to remain in control of their venture. Common
goals held by the lifestyle entrepreneur include earning a living doing something that they love,
earning a living in a way that facilitates self-employment, achieving a good work/life balance
and owning a business without shareholders. Many lifestyle entrepreneurs are very dedicated to
their business and may work within the creative industries or tourism industry,[7] where a
passion before profit approach to entrepreneurship often prevails. While many entrepreneurs
may launch their business
with a clear exit strategy, a lifestyle entrepreneur may deliberately and consciously choose to
keep their venture fully within their own control. Lifestyle entrepreneurship is becoming
increasing popular as technology provides small business owners with the digital platforms
needed to reach a large global market. Younger lifestyle entrepreneurs, typically those between
25 and 40 years old, are sometimes referred to as Treps.
Cooperative entrepreneur
A cooperative entrepreneur doesn't just work alone, but rather collaborates with other
cooperative entrepreneurs to develop projects, particularly cooperative projects. Each
cooperative
entrepreneur might bring different skill sets to the table, but collectively they share in the risk
and success of the venture.
Theory-based Typologies
Recent advances in entrepreneurship research indicate that the differences in entrepreneurs and
heterogeneity in their behaviors and actions can be traced back to their the founder's identity.
For instance, Fauchart and Gruber (2011, Academy of Management Journal) have recently
shown that - based on social identity theory - three main types of entrepreneurs can be
distinguished: Darwinians, Communitarians and Missionaries. These types of founders not only
diverge in fundamental ways in terms of their self-views and their social motivations in
entrepreneurship, but also engage fairly differently in new firm creation.
Evolution of Entrepreneurship Researchers have been inconsistent in their definitions of
entrepreneurship (Brockhaus & Horwitz, 1986, Sexton & Smilor, Wortman, 1987; Gartner, 1988).
Definitions have emphasized a broad range of activities including the creation of organizat ions (Gartner,
1988), the carrying out of new combinations (Schumpeter, 1934), the exploration of opportunities
(Kirzner, 1973), the bearing of uncertainty (Knight 1921), the bringing together of factors of production
(Say, 1803), and others (See Long, 1983). The outline below presents some authors definitions of
entrepreneurship and attempts to summarize these viewpoints into a more meaningful whole.
Joseph Schumpeter (1934); The entrepreneur is the innovator who implements change within markets
through the carrying out of new combinations. The carrying out of new combinations can take several
forms; 1) the introduction of a new good or quality thereof, 2) the introduction of a new method of
production, 3) the opening of a new market, 4) the conquest of a new source of supply of new materials
or parts, 5) the carrying out of the new organization of any industry. Schumpeter equated
entrepreneurship with the concept of innovation applied to a business context. As such, the entrepreneur
moves the market away from equilibrium. Schumpter's definition also emphasized the combination of
resources. Yet, the managers of already established business are not entrepreneurs to Schumpeter.
Penrose (1963); Entrepreneurial activity involves identifying opportunities within the economic
system. Managerial capacities are different from entrepreneurial capacities
Harvey Leibenstein (1968, 1979); the entrepreneur fills market deficiencies through
inputcompleting activities. Entrepreneurship involves "activities necessary to create or carry on
an enterprise where not all markets are well established or clearly defined and/or in which
relevant parts of the production function are not completely known.
Israel Kirzner (1979); The entrepreneur recognizes and acts upon market opportunities. The
entrepreneur is essentially an arbitrageur. In contrast to Schumpeter's viewpoint, the
entrepreneur moves the market toward equilibrium.
Gartner(1988); The creation of new organizations
The Entrepreneurship Center at Miami University of Ohio has an interesting definition of
entrepreneurship: "Entrepreneurship is the process of identifying, developing, and bringing a
vision to life. The vision may be an innovative idea, an opportunity, or simply a better way to
do something. The end result of this process is the creation of a new venture, formed under
conditions of risk and considerable uncertainty. "
An entrepreneur performs a series of functions necessary right from the genesis of an idea up to
the establishment and effective operation of an enterprise. He carries out the whole set of
activities of the business for its success. He recognizes the commercial potential of a product or
a service, formulates operating policies for production, product design, marketing and
organisational structure. He is thus a nucleus of high growth of the enterprise.
According some economists, the functions of an entrepreneur is classified into five broad
categories:
1. Risk-bearing function,
2. Organizational function,
3. Innovative function,
1. Risk-bearing function:
The functions of an entrepreneur as risk bearer are specific in nature. The entrepreneur assumes
all possible risks of business which emerges due to the possibility of changes in the tastes of
consumers, modern techniques of production and new inventions. Such risks are not insurable
and incalculable. In simple terms such risks are known as uncertainty concerning a loss.
The entrepreneur, according to Kinght, "is the economic functionary who undertakes such responsibility
of uncertainty which by its very nature cannot be insured nor capitalised nor salaried too. "
Thus, risk bearing or uncertainty bearing still remains the most important function of an
entrepreneur which he tries to minimise by his initiative, skill and good judgement. J.B. Say
and other have stressed risk taking as the specific function of the entrepreneur.
2. Organisational Function:
Entrepreneur as an organiser and his organising function is described by J.B. Say as a function whereby
the entrepreneur brings together various factors of production, ensures continuing management and
renders risk-bearing functions as well. His definition associates entrepreneur with the functions of
coordination, organisation and supervision. According to him, an entrepreneur is one who combines the
land of one, the labour of another and the capital of yet another and thus produces a product. By selling
the product in the market, he pays interest on capital, rent on land and wages to labourers and what
remains is his/her profit. In this way, he describes an entrepreneur as an organiser who alone determines
the lines of business to expand and capital to employ more judiciously. He is the ultimate judge
in the conduct of the business.
Marshall also advocated the significance of organisation among the services of special class of
business undertakers.
1. Innovative Function:
The basic function an entrepreneur performs is to innovate new products, services, ideas and
informations for the enterprise. As an innovator, the entrepreneur foresees the potentially
profitable opportunity and tries to exploit it. He is always involved in the process of doing new
things. Ac cording to Peter Drucker, "Innovation is the means by which the entrepreneur either
creates new wealth producing resources or endows existing resources with enhanced potential
for creating wealth". Whenever a new idea occurs entrepreneurial efforts are essential to
convert the idea into practical application.
The introduction of a new product in the market with which the customers are not get familiar
with.Introduction of a new method of production technology which is not yet tested by
experience in the branch of manufacture concerned.
The opening of a new market into which the specific product has not previously entered.
The discovery of a new source of supply of raw material, irrespective of whether this source
already exists or has first to be created.
The carrying out of the new form of oranisation of any industry by creating of a monopoly
position or the breaking up of it.
2. Managerial Function:
Entrepreneur also performs a variety of managerial function like determination of business objectives,
formulation of production plans, product analysis and market research, organisation of sales procurring
machine and material, recruitment of men and undertaking, of business operations. He also undertakes
the basic managerial functions of planning, organising, coordinating, staffing, directing, motivating and
controlling in the enterprise. He provides a logical and scientific basis to the above functions for the
smooth operation of the enterprise thereby avoids chaos in the field of production, marketing,
purchasing, recruiting and selection, etc. In large establishments, these managerial functions of the
entrepreneur are delegated to the paid managers for more effective and efficient execution.
The most vital function an entrepreneur discharges refers to decision making in various fields of the
business enterprise. He is the decision maker of all activities of the enterprise. A. H. Cole described an
entrepreneur as a decision maker and attributed the following functions to him.
He decides in securing adequate financial resources for the organisation and maintains good
relations with the existing and potential investors and financiers.
He decides the development of a market for his product, develops new product or modify the
existing product in accordance with the changing consumer's fashion, taste and preference.
He also decides to maintain good relations with the public authorities as well as with the society
at large for improving the firms image before others.
Intrapreneurship
In 1992, The American Heritage Dictionary acknowledged the popular use of a new word,
intrapreneur, to mean "A person within a large corporation who takes direct responsibility for
turning an idea into a profitable finished product through assertive risk-taking and innovation".
Intrapreneurship is now known as the practice of a corporate management style that integrates
risk-taking and innovation approaches, as well as the reward and motivational techniques, that
are more traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship.
History
The first written use of the terms ‗intrapreneur‘, ‗intrapreneuring,‘ and ‗intrapreneurship‘ date from a
paper written in 1978 by Gifford and Elizabeth Pinchot. Later the term was credited to Gifford Pinchot
III by Norman Macrae in the April 17, 1982 issue of The Economist.[2] The first formal
academic case study of corporate entrepreneurship or intrapreneurship was published in June
1982, as a Master's in Management thesis, by Howard Edward Haller, on the intrapreneurial
creation of PR1ME Leasing within PR1ME Computer Inc. (from 1977 to 1981). This academic
research was later published as a case study by VDM Verlag as Intrapreneurship Success:A
PR1ME Example by Howard Edward Haller, Ph.D. The American Heritage
Dictionary of the English Language included the term 'intrapreneur' in its 3rd 1992 Edition, and
also
credited[3] Gifford Pinchot III as the originator of the concept. The term "intrapreneurship" was used in
the popular media first in February 1985 by TIME magazine article "Here come the Intrapreneurs" and
then the same year in another major popular publication was in a quote by Steve Jobs,App le
Computer‘s
Chairman, in an interview in the September 1985 Newsweek article,[4] where he shared, ¯The
Macintosh team was what is commonly known as intrapreneurship;only a few years before the term was
coined—a group of people going, in essence, back to the garage, but in a large company."
CONCEPT OF ENTERPRENEURSHIP:
1. Entrepreneurship is the process of creating value by bringing together a uniquepackage of resources
to exploit an opportunity.2. Entrepreneurship is the pursuit of opportunity without regard to resources
currentlycontrolled.From both definitions above, we can note that Entrepreneurs are opportunity
driven.Opportunity comes from changes in the environment, and one characteristic of Entrepreneurs is
that they are good a seeing patterns of change. It is also evidentthat Entrepreneurs are not resource
driven -while the manager asks, "Given theresources under my control, what can I achieve?" the
Entrepreneur asks "Given whatI want to achieve, what resources do I need to acquire?"
Difference between Intrepreneur andEntrepreneur:
Intrapreneur is a person who focuses on innovation and creativity and who transformsa dream
or an idea into a profitable venture, by operating within the organizationalenvironment.
Intrapreneurs, by definition, embody the same characteristics as theEntrepreneur, conviction,
passion, and drive. If the company is supportive, theIntrapreneur succeeds. When the
organization is not, the Intrapreneur usually fails orleaves to start a new company.An
Intrapreneur thinks like an entrepreneur seeking out opportunities, which benefitthe
corporation. It was a new way of thinking, in making companies more productiveand
profitable. Visionary employees who thought like entrepreneurs. IBM is oneof the leading
companies, which encourages INTRAPRENEUR.
MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ENTERPRENEURSHIP AND INTRAPRENEURSHIP:
There are, of course, a few things that are different between Intrapreneurship andEntrepreneurship. For starters,
the Intrapreneur acts within the confines of an existingorganisation. The dictates of most organisations would be
that the Intrapreneurshould ask for permission before attempting to create a desired future - in pract ice,the
Intrapreneur is more inclined to act first and ask for forgiveness than to ask forpermission before acting.The
Intrapreneur is also typically the intra-organisational revolutionary - challengingthe status quo and fighting to
change the system fro m within. This ordinarily creates acertain amount of organisational friction. A healthy dose
of mutual respect is required in order to ensure that such friction can be positively channeled. On e advantage of
Intrapreneurship over Entrepreneurship is that Intrapreneurtypically finds a ready source of "free" resources
within the organisation which can be Stages of Entrepreneurship
There are six stages of an entrepreneurial venture that founders of companies will
encounter. If you choose to purchase an existing business, you may skip a few steps, but you
will still be forced to address several of them. The six steps are:
Stage 1: CONVICTION
No matter the stage of the business when an individual begins his/her entrepreneurial journey, every
entrepreneur must address his/her conviction to be an entrepreneur. This sounds trivial, but I believe it is
the most important step in the process. It SHOULD be the first step; however, many entrepreneurs wait
until the VENTURE stage to address it. This can lead to grave problems. In the CONVICTION stage, an
entrepreneur needs to figure out if he/she has the conviction to withstand the fundamental
issues of entrepreneurship.
Stage 2: IDEA
The IDEA stage is the easiest stage. Everyone has an idea for a business. This is also the most
fun stage because the cost is zero and the excitement level high. Of course, the IDEA stage is
the basis for every other stage so it cannot be dismissed; however, as an entrepreneur, you
should never confuse an "idea" for a "concept". As you will see in the next step, a concept has
much more structure than an idea and subsequently warrants a different concerns and decision
making
Stage 3: CONCEPT
As mentioned above, a concept is characterized by structure. In the CONCEPT stage, you take
your idea and employ a certain intellectual rigor which includes:
- Extensive market research
- Development of the business model
- Conceptualization of the type of the team required to execute
- Engagement of informal and formal advisors
Stage 4: VENTURE
This is the most challenging stage of the business and for many entrepreneurs the most
fun...well at least in the beginning. The VENTURE stage is characterized by significant
investment. This investment typically comes in two forms: money and time. In most cases, as
the entrepreneur, it is "your" money and "your" time; and those can often be significant.
Stage 5: BUSINESS
The BUSINESS stage is where all entrepreneurs strive to be. This is the stage where you have
revenues that are commensurate with your expenses. Of course, there may be unprofitable
months or years, but in general, the business can support itself with little outside capital. This is
the stage where you are most likely to find investors.
Stage 6: SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS
Although most entrepreneurs are satisfied to build a Business, they should strive to become a
Sustainable Business. There are unique challenges to creating a sustainable business and it can
be defined in different ways. It is typically characterized by time. Ventures that last 10+ years
may be thought of as sustainable; however, the real challenge is for a business to outlast the
involvement of its founders. That is a more relevant definition of a sustainable business.
The Role of the Entrepreneur
Entrepreneurs occupy a central position in a market economy. For it's the entrepreneurs who serve as the
spark plug in the economy's engine, activating and stimulating all economic activity. The economic
success of nations worldwide is the result of encouraging and rewarding the entrepreneurial instinct.
A society is prosperous only to the degree to which it rewards and encourages entrepreneurial
activity because it is the entrepreneurs and their activities that are the critical determinant of the
level of success, prosperity, growth and opportunity in any economy. The most dynamic
societies in the world are the ones that have the most entrepreneurs, plus the economic and
legal structure to encourage and motivate entrepreneurs to greater activities.
For years, economists viewed entrepreneurship as a small part of economic activity. But in the
1800s, the Austrian School of Economics was the first to recognize the entrepreneur as the
person having the central role in all economic activity. Why is that?
Because it's entrepreneurial energy, creativity and motivation that trigger the production and
sale of new products and services. It is the entrepreneur who undertakes the risk of the
enterprise in search of profit and who seeks opportunities to profit by satisfying as yet
unsatisfied needs.
Entrepreneurs seek disequilibrium--a gap between the wants and needs of customers and the products
and services that are currently available. The entrepreneur then brings together the factors of production
necessary to produce, offer and sell desired products and services. They invest and risk their money--and
other people's money--to produce a product or service that can be sold at a profit.
More than any other member of our society, entrepreneurs are unique because they're capable
of bringing together the money, raw materials, manufacturing facilities, skilled labor and land
or buildings required to produce a product or service. And they're capable of arranging the
marketing, sales and distribution of that product or service.
Entrepreneurs are optimistic and future oriented; they believe that success is possible and are
willing to risk their resources in the pursuit of profit. They're fast moving, willing to try many
different strategies to achieve their goals of profits. And they're flexible, willing to change
quickly when they get new information.
Entrepreneurs are skilled at selling against the competition by creating perceptions of difference
and uniqueness in their products and services. They continually seek out customer needs that
the competition is not satisfying and find ways to offer their products and services in such a
way that what they're offering is more attractive than anything else available.
Entrepreneurs are a national treasure, and should be protected, nourished, encouraged and rewarded as
much as possible. They create all wealth, all jobs, all opportunities, and all prosperity in the nation.
They're the most important people in a market economy--and there are never enough of them.
As an entrepreneur, you are extremely important to your world. Your success is vital to the
success of the nation. To help you develop a better business, one that contributes to the health
of the economy, I'm going to suggest that you take some time to sit down, answer the following
questions, and implement the following actions:
What opportunities exist today for you to create or bring new products or services to your
market that people want, need and are willing to pay for? What are your three best
opportunities?
1. Identify the steps you could take immediately to operate your business more
efficiently, especially regarding internal operating systems.
2. Tell yourself continually "Failure is not an option." Be willing to move out of your
comfort zone, to take risks if necessary to build your business.
3. Use your creativity rather than your money to find new, better, cheaper ways to sell
your products or reduce your costs of operation. What could you do immediately in
one or both of these areas?
4. Imagine starting over. Is there anything you're doing today that, knowing what you
now know, you wouldn't get into or start up again?
5. Imagine reinventing your business. If your business burned to the ground today, and
you had to start over, what would you not get into again? What would you do
differently?
Sramana is doing a series on Entrepreneurship – Innovation in India for Forbes and requested
my perspective about the same. I chose to write down my thoughts as a post and seek out your
thoughts about it as well.
When it comes to entrepreneurship in India, for the longest time now, it seems that most of us
have been rehashing, repeating and regurgitating the same things over and over again:
¯Revamp Education system‖ , ¯Lack of funding‖ , ¯No ecosystem‖ , ¯No product companies‖ , ¯Indian mindset and culture‖ , ¯Bureaucratic red-tape‖ and many
other such reasons.
Its time we really took a deep, hard look at what is the current state of entrepreneurship in India,
what is broken and how can we really fix it ?
In all fairness, I am not on ground zero. And so it may seem as inappropriate to many that I
speak of entrepreneurship in India while residing in the US. You might very well diss my
opinions expressed below based on the same grounds, and in that case, I welcome your
perspective – hopefully we can have a healthy discussion via the comments. In my defense,
even though I‘m
not at ground zero, I have been closely monitoring the startup and entrepreneurship scene in
India over the last couple of years. I‘ve talked to lots of Indian entrepreneurs, tech enthusiasts
and VC‘s over this time – enough to form an opinion.
If someone who‘s totally ignorant about the Indian market walks up to me and asks me about
entrepreneurship in India – my answer to them would be that its more hype than happening.
The awareness about entrepreneurship is definitely increasing incredibly, but not enough
converts yet. Lots of wannapreneurs, but few actual entrepreneurs.Again, my goal isnt to
ridicule or point fingers, but rather narrow down on what‘s broken.
Some of the most commonly attributed reasons for the lack of entrepreneurship in India:
Lack of funding:
Is lack of funding that much of a big deal really ? The cost to do a technology startup has gone
down drastically. Reduced hardware costs, bandwidth costs have dropped, cloud computing
and open source technologies make it really cheap to launch a technology startup. Unless you
are launching a capital intensive business, why should you really need outside funding for
doing a startup ?
Look at the Ycombinator model – $5k – $10K per startup, which is literally peanuts if you need
to survive in Silicon Valley. Why cant Indian entrepreneurs be cheap in a similar way ? Why
not bootstrap ?
No Ecosystem:
If you would have made this argument 5 years back, I‘d probably have agreed. But over the last
few years, the startup ecosystem has improved by leaps and bounds. VC‘s have entered the
Indian market, events and conferences are helping the startup community to network and
converge, B- plan competitions on various campuses are raising awareness, an active and
vibrant community is forming around entrepreneurship.
Bureaucratic red-tape:
While I agree that some things in this aspect are not as smooth as in other countries. However,
most of the entrepreneurs I talked to did not cite this as a major hindrance as part of their
entrepreneurial journey. Hire a chartered accountant and he will take care of majority of the
initial process of incorporation, taxation and other legalities.
No Product Companies:
I for one dont really buy into this argument. While I agree that product companies may offer
long term sustainence value (while current outsourcing focused services companies are simply
benefiting from the cost advantage), but then entrepreneurship is still entrepreneurship – be it a
services or a product company.
Below are some of the reasons that I personally think have a strong impact on entrepreneurship in India:
Revamping Education:
If you look at the success of Silicon Valley, one of the key factors that was instrumental in
shaping it was Stanford & UC Berkeley. Ditto is the case with Israel‘s Technion. I strongly
believe that education, innovation and entrepreneurship go hand in hand – especially
technology innovation. While the IIT‘s have immensely successful alumni, the IIT‘s have not
been able to create a fertile hotbed of innovation & entrepreneurship in their own backyard.
At the same time, we need to encourage out of the box thinking as part of our education system.
Rote learning can only get us so far. We need to ramp up coursework so that student skills remain
in sync with the rest of the market. When Stanford and other universities are teaching iPhone and
Facebook app related courses, teaching Cobol & Fortran to Indian students would be stupid in
today‘s age. Students should be encouraged to consider entrepreneurship as a viable career
option. I believe this to be the single biggest factor that could foster entrepreneurship in India.
Young college graduates are at an age when their inherent risk is at the least to becoming an
entrepreneur. Educating them early enough would also give them ample time to shape up their
skills and experience that can prepare them for their entrepreneurial journey. We also should
make it easy and acceptable for students to take sabbaticals from their degree coursework.
Currently, this if frowned upon in Indian society — we should try to make people more accepting
of it.
The NEN Foundation has done a good job at increasing entrepreneurship awareness across
various campuses. However, when you take a quick peek at some of the questions that are asked
by some of the student participants, it just boggles your mind. Few are requesting ideas, several
requesting funding even before doing any analysis of the idea and several others simply leave you
in sheer disbelief. One common aspect across most of the questions is that they are looking for
handholding. And I think that really needs to change. I‘m not sure if we‘re (including mainstream
media that has glamourized stories about entrepreneurship and VC fundings) sending them the
wrong signals – but if you think all information, market research and other info will be served to
you on a silver platter, then probably being an entrepreneur is not in your best interests.
We missed out on the technology innovation bus, but if we dont really ramp up our education
system and associated R&D – innovation, we might end up sitting on the sidelines of the
cleantech wagon as well.
We probably need someone to lead & pave the way just like what Yossi Vardi did to Israel and
what NR Murthy did to the outsourcing market in India.
These are the three things that I think have the biggest impact — but then, there‘s a good chance
that you might disagree. This is a highly subjective topic and everyone has their own conviction
about it. I think when it comes to technology entrepreneurship, we should try and do a detailed case
study of Israel. The country has just a population of 7 million, hostile neighbors and high taxes. Yet
it boasts of the 2nd highest concentration of startups just after the
US. They‘re definitely doing something right. And that‘s what we should try & emulate.
Business opportunities can be obtained from various manazines, trade journals, financial
institutions, government, commercial organizations, friends, relatives, competitors etc.
Choosing of best business opportunity from the information collected requires ingenuity,
skill and foresight of entrepreneur. An entrepreneur has to identify and select the most
rewarding opportunity from the available ones. For this one has to evaluate the following
areas and understand the gap between demand and supply.
5.Government: Government also identifies and proposes ideas and give support for
business opportunities.
feasibility of that operation. Market feasibility study involves the study and analysis of the
following aspects. Market feasibility study will assess whether the product has good
market. This needs to study the following:
Nature of market: The nature of market in terms of monopolistic or perfect competition is
to be studied.
Selling price and profit: Selling price plays a vital role in profit. In price sensitive goods
like cosmetics, one should be careful in fixing the price.
Demand: Present demand and demand forecast are prepared and studied. This will decide
the facility planning.
Market share: Estimated market share is to be made. Comparison is made with share of
similar products.
Target market: Study is made with regard to the target market and market segmentation.
Utilities: The details about availability of utilities like water, gas electricity, petrol,
diesel etc. are to be studied.
Proposed balance sheet: Proposed balance sheet is made showing liabilities and
assets, depreciation, interest burden, profits expected etc.
• Location: The location is in such a place that it should not have objection
from the neighbors.
• Social problem: The enterprise should not create any nuisance to the public.
• Pollution: There should not have any sort of noise or other pollution objectionable
society. Suitable measures are to be taken for controlling pollution.
• Other problem: Any other problems related to the society and people are to be studied.
END