Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Westray Mine Disaster

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Westray Mine Disaster 1

Running Head: WESTRAY MINE DISASTER

Westray Mine Disaster

Writer's Name

Teacher's Name
Westray Mine Disaster 2

Westray Mine Disaster

Question 1: What were the incidents that led to the outcome of the incident?

Answer: On 9th May 1992, early in the morning in a small town of Plymouth, Nova

Scotia 'Westray Mine' had an explosion when methane gas leaked inside the mine followed by a

coal dust explosion (Novascotia.ca, 1997) The miners present in the southwest sections and the

North mains died because of the poisoning of carbon monoxide combustion along with serious

physical injuries. Whereas, the miners present within the Southwest 2 section died

instantaneously due to carbon monoxide. After carefully reading the case study, it can be said

there was a series of factors that led to the outcome of the Westray Mine Disaster including

insufficient experience and training of the duty inspectors of Westray along with negligence of

bureaucrats, mine management and politicians, all such factors collectively led to the Westray

Mine Disaster.

Question 2: What could have been done to protect this?

Answer: As O'Connelt & Mills, (2017) stated Westray Mine was full of coal and its

buyers were disparate to get it, massive loans were given by the governments, every news was

good except some complains from the workforce that there should have been more safety

precautions as it was a dangerous mine. Precautions to keep coal dust and methane at safe levels

and improvement in ventilation design were needed to avoid the disaster. It was also a big

mistake to disconnect Methane detectors due to repeated alarms. The Department of Labour

raised its concerns with regards to the absence of stone-dusting (carried out to neutralize the

explosive nature of the material) along with accumulation of the highly flammable coal dust on
Westray Mine Disaster 3

the walls and floors of Westray. Also, A provincial inspector ordered to clean the stone-dust and

coal dust; however, the order was not enforced during his next visit that he paid few days prior to

the disaster which was a big negligence. Also, a safety training of everyone associated with the

mine was highly needed. Proper legislation and regulation could have helped to avoid the

situation. Of course legal change does not have an immediate or direct impact on mining;

however, it was needed for making sure that coal mining was done while keeping the safety as

the primary and most significant consideration.

Question 3: Who in your estimation was at fault?

Answer: The mine was seen as dangerous from the beginning (Thompsom, 2017). In a

letter Bernie Boudreau, Liberal MLA warned Leroy Legere who was Labour Minister of Nova

Scotia that the Westray coal mine was possibly the most dangerous mine of the world. Later,

within the very first two months of its operation, the Westray Mine had experienced four roof

falls. Inspectors of Department of Labour asked to improvise the roof support plans from the

company. In my view, the poor management on behalf of the Curragh Resources Incorporated,

politicians and negligence of the government regulators should be held responsible for the

disaster.
Westray Mine Disaster 4

References

Novascotia.ca, (1997) https://novascotia.ca/lae/pubs/westray/

O'Connelt, C. J., & Mills, A. J. (2017). The Westray mine explosion. In The Dark Side (pp. 162-

178). Routledge.

Thompsom, M. (2017). Hell's History: The USW's Fight to Prevent Workplace Deaths and

Injuries from the 1992 Westray Mine. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, 72(1),

207-209.

You might also like