Shawn Hatchett
Shawn Hatchett
Shawn Hatchett
Do you ever wonder if conflicts between police officers and civilians would have changed if it
was actual footage of the conflicts between them?...In a scenario on the north side of Georgia had all their
officers with body cameras so when there was any situation with any citizens they can know what
actually happened at the scene. Helping with court cases having them not take so much time out the year
just to convict a suspect or find out if he guilty or innocent. Meanwhile on the south the officers has no
bodied cameras and is having all this trouble with citizens and in court cases it takes them a long time to
prosecute a suspect on what they have done or what they have not done.
In March, seven officers were arrested for abusing their power. In April, the Justice Department
placed the city under a consent decree aimed at reforming the city’s policing practices a result of the civil
rights investigation that followed the death of Freddie Gray in 2015. The city has planned public forums
next week to select an independent monitor for the decree, which will pour millions of dollars into
improving city law enforcement. Body cameras being added to the officers uniforms is helping better the
conflicts between police and citizens, having the right evidence to solve cases, and help make a better
environment so that a lot of crazy things won’t happen with people and police officers. “We have long
supported the use of police body cameras to help identify police misconduct, but such footage is
meaningless if prosecutors continue to rely on these officers, especially if they do so without disclosing
their bad acts”. Having the body cameras will hold officers accountable for how they react in situations
with public citizens. Police officers should be required to wear body cameras because it helps
decrease the negative conflict between police officers and public citizens, helps hold police officers
accountable for their actions, and they can help with evidence in court cases.
The study published in the Journal of Experimental Criminology informed that police officers
were more cautious and risk averse when wearing body cameras. Authors, Justin Ready and Jacob Young
suggest that the reason that officers who wear cameras have made fewer arrests and conducted fewer stop
and frisks was because they thought more carefully when approaching situations with public citizens.
The researchers note that a possible reason why officers with cameras wrote more citations was because
8397883
they were worried they would be put on suspension for not issuing a citation to a public citizen when they
have violated an order or a traffic law. “Police executives may support new technology that brings greater
accountability and less civil liability, but line officers focus on how it may limit their use of discretion in
the field,” the authors Justin Ready and Jacob Young state (Kelsh 2015). Officers who did not wear body
cameras applied more stop and frisks and made more arrests than officers who wore the video cameras.
Officers that didn’t wear cameras performed 9.8% more stop and frisks and made 6.9% more arrests than
In San Diego, there was a report on cops to see if wearing body cameras decrease the use of force
and yes, it showed that wearing body cameras has a positive impacted between citizens and officers. In
the report showed that “high-level use of force, such as physical takedowns and using Tasers, chemical
agents or weapons, is down 16.4 percent. Low-level use of force, such as physical strength, controlled
holds and Taser warnings, is up 25.3 percent” (Garrick 2017). “More serious allegations related to
criminal behavior, discrimination, force and racial or ethnic slurs are down 47.4 percent, while allegations
related to conduct, courtesy, procedure and service are down 40.4 percent” (Garrick 2017). Data from San
Diego nine pages paper report creates an eye opener for a new solution towards the negative conflicts
Democratic lawmakers Shirley Weber and Kevin McCarty announced a bill in California that
could improve officers accountability standards statewide by putting out stricter ways on how and when
officers should lethal force toward a public citizen. The legislation is aimed at making it easier to bring
cases against law enforcement. The Police Accountability and Community Protection Act would change
the current way from using force reasonable to use force necessary having officers take deadly action
“only when it is necessary to prevent things that about to happen and serious bodily injury or death” and
if, given all circumstances, there was no reasonable alternative. Shirley Weber said lawmakers must
ensure the state’s policy “stresses the importance of human life” (Charles 2018). Many policing experts
say the law may be a helpful step in society, but its not a solution for all situations. Alex Vitale, a
professor of sociology at Brooklyn College said “The mechanisms of accountability require discretion by
prosecutors and juries who typically have given police tremendous latitude in their use of force,
Body cameras have improved officer’s reactions in an uncomfortable situation making them
become more respectful towards public citizens (Sutherland, Ariel 2016). The killing of many people
8397883
wanted to change the way of how officers acted so many police departments supported body cameras for
the new tool on officers uniform. The more officers was wearing them the more they knew how to act
right when dealing with any situation. Cops became more cautious because they knew they are being film
so overtime that helped with a lot of lives being on the line when dealing with police authority. See it’s
not a bad thing to have these body cameras around because public citizens and officers are becoming
more friendly with one another instead of hating each other guts, causing problems, and destroying
society.
Body camera footages are extremely helpful in court between officers and members of the public
society. On March 11, 2015 in Cleveland there was a case dealing with a suspect Theodore Johnson and
four officers. During that night shooting had occurred but this time it wasn’t the officers that had shot
first. Court cases have a long time with convicting whether a suspect is innocent or guilty when it has
been a conflict between officers and a suspect but this situation was a little different from the other court
cases. On that night the officers had arrived to Johnson’s apartment to question him. For no apparent
reason, Johnson shot Officer David Muniz. The four officers ordered Johnson to put his gun down trying
to reason with him. As they kept telling him to put the gun down, he refused and started to raise the gun
up at the other officers leading them to shoot him. Now, In court the officers had their jobs on the line this
is where the body cameras help with court cases such as this one they had their body cameras on that
night so in court the judge could see evidence on how the situation had escalated to a deadly killing of
Theodore Johnson. Even though the officers killed him body cameras are a big help in court cases
because the footages are showing the judge and jury the truth of what happens between public citizens
and officers when citizens are confronted by them. Although society may think police hate them, Officers
wearing body cameras helps out with finding the true justice citizens will need in court when fighting for
their freedom."It was a horrible situation that obviously had deadly consequences, but at least we don’t
have to be at this point questioning whether the officer was making up a story," says Professor Burke a
Another example, In California there was a situation with a man and Officer Carlos Ramirez. As
Ramirez approached the man trying to question him about a child abused on his step son, the man started
to apply threats at the officer. Now, most situations like this end with deadly consequences. In this case
Ramirez didn’t lose his cool and act as if he was threatened by the suspect he walked back to his car and
uploaded the footage which increased public trust towards officers. “When you know you're being
watched you behave a little better. That's just human nature," said Farrar. "As an officer you act a bit
more professional, follow the rules a bit better." When the footage was released it was a eye opener for
the way police approach citizens for society having “use of force” to drop from a 88% to 60% which is a
big improvement to society and many lives (Carroll 2015). Say if the man was to take a statement to court
saying that he was assaulted by Officer Ramirez but wearing body cameras helps out with situations like
that.
Police officers should be required to wear body cameras on duty because it decreases the impacts
between officers and public citizens, helps hold policemen accountable for their actions, and they can
help with evidence in court cases. Years and years have past and officers continue to have conflicts with
civilians. Throughout those situations, society has lost a lot of trust in officers. Body cameras is a way for
the police to have better trustworthy relationships with public citizens. Wearing body cameras while
officers on duty cause them use force only when it’s right not when they always feel like they are in
danger. Unnecessary force has dropped ever since body cameras have been introduced.
Governments have become more strict with police officers ever since they have seen the way
negative stops and frisks occurred. Court cases have been taking a toll on how citizens look and treat
policemen when dealing with cop. In court, judge and jury take months to come up with a hearing that
says if they are guilty or innocent. In the end, officers are always let free and that’s where body cameras
come in. The footage that come from the body cameras will become a huge help for citizens and officers
to have true justice in court instead of not having evidence in a trial that take months after months to
prosecute an officer or a suspect on their wrong doing. Body cameras are not just help in society but it
matters because it will change the way society is acting nowadays, and the way police officers get away
8397883
with a lot of illegal treatments towards public citizens. These cameras are not just looking out for the
officers but they are also looking out for the people who are harassed, and they help reduce the unjust
killing of innocent people. If more people in society support this new tool on a cop uniform than they
wouldn’t have to worry about if they get assaulted by a cop unnecessarily. Having video footage will be
Works Cited
Carroll, Rory. “California Police Use of Body Cameras Cuts Violence and Complaints.” The
www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/04/california-police-body-cameras-cuts-violence-
complaints-rialto.
8397883
Charles, Safiya. “'Please Give Us Justice': New California Law Aims to Hold Police
california-law-aims-to-hold-police-accountable/.
“Cleveland Case Shows How Body Cameras Can Help Police.” The Christian Science Monitor,
www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/1013/Cleveland-case-shows-how-body-cameras-can-
help-police.
“Do Body Cameras Change How Police Interact with the Public?” Journalist's Resource,
justice/body-cameras-police-interact-with-public.
Garrick, David. “Report: SDPD Body Cameras Reducing Misconduct, Aggressive Use of
www.sandiegouniontribune.com/news/politics/sd-me-body-cameras-20170209-story.html.
Sutherland, et al. “How Police Body Cameras Can Improve Behavior, Ease Tension.” RAND
behavior-ease-tension.html.