Sydney Opera House - Case Study Report
Sydney Opera House - Case Study Report
Sydney Opera House - Case Study Report
HOUSE
CASE STUDY
REPORT
Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... 2
Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 3
1. About this Report .................................................................................................................................. 5
2. About the Case Study ............................................................................................................................ 5
3. Acknowledgements............................................................................................................................... 6
4. About the Sydney Opera House ............................................................................................................ 6
4.1. BIM in the Sydney Opera House ................................................................................................... 7
4.2. BIM for Asset/Facility Management ........................................................................................... 11
4.3. Performance Indicators .............................................................................................................. 13
4.4. Drivers ......................................................................................................................................... 14
4.5. Challenges ................................................................................................................................... 16
4.6. Success Factors ........................................................................................................................... 19
4.7. Client Approach........................................................................................................................... 20
4.8. Expected Challenges during Implementation ............................................................................. 21
5. Bibliography ........................................................................................................................................ 22
6. Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 23
6.1. Sydney Opera House BIM for FM Objectives .............................................................................. 23
Figure 1 Sydney Opera House original model and drawings showing element information.. ..................... 7
Figure 2 Computer Report ............................................................................................................................ 8
Figure 3 Scottish Ten Scanning. .................................................................................................................. 11
Figure 4 Sample View – Potential Visual Analytics. .................................................................................... 12
Figure 5 The BIM interface Base Functionality ........................................................................................... 13
Figure 6 Objectives under Digital Modelling............................................................................................... 23
Figure 7 Objectives under Oriented Architecture....................................................................................... 23
Figure 8 Objectives under Enterprise Framework. ..................................................................................... 24
Figure 9 Objectives under Advantages of an Integrated Digital Model...................................................... 25
The present report summarises the findings of the Sydney Opera House (SOH) Case Study carried out as
part of SBEnrc Project 2.34 Driving Whole-of-life Efficiencies through BIM and Procurement. This report
is informed by outcomes from interviews and document analysis as they relate to the development and
implementation of the Building Information Modelling (BIM) for asset management interface at the
SOH.
The SOH is an iconic Australian building with a long-standing history of innovative information
management. This history starts with a challenging design and construction process which prompted
what could be the first field-to-finish system for surveyors in Australia creating great efficiency gains,
and now continues with the implementation of what is expected to be a fully integrated BIM asset
management system.
The SOH BIM journey started in 2004 with the Exemplar Project carried out by the Cooperative for
Research Centre (CRC) for Construction Innovation which tested a partial digital facilities management
model and made a number of recommendations in 2007 based on collaborative research with the SOH.
Since then, BIM practices have been used for construction works and their information management
team has endeavoured in completing the BIM REVIT /Architectural model.
The SOH expects to achieve significant advantages from implementing BIM. Specific drivers identified
were:
During the past 10 years, the SOH has faced the following challenges in the development of their BIM for
asset management system:
Software limitations/inadequacy
Limited funds
Data availability
Finding the right answer
Resistance to change
Public asset government requirements
Australia’s geographic isolation
Uniqueness of the SOH.
Success factors identified for the development of a BIM for asset management strategy:
The SOH has taken an informed and involved client approach to the development of their BIM guidelines
and requirements. They have carried out extensive research into international and national practices,
significant stakeholder engagement and collaboration as well as maintaining close ties to industry and
research groups.
The SOH will aim to address the following expected challenges during the BIM solution rollout:
Future research will aim to understand specific benefits achieved from the implementation of the BIM
interface for asset management systems.
This report summarises the findings of the Sydney Opera House (SOH) Case Study carried out as part of
SBEnrc Project 2.34 Driving Whole-of-life Efficiencies through BIM and Procurement. The case study
draws from: (i) an interview series with SOH staff at three levels of decision making (information
management, strategy and section director); (ii) documents analysis of key documentation provided by
SOH representatives and interviewees; and (iii) information provided by other sources previously
involved with the SOH.
(i) What frameworks and benchmarks exist nationally and internationally that could be applied to
the evaluation of whole-of-life benefits gained from implementing Building Information
Modelling (BIM) during procurement and asset management?
(ii) What Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and success criteria must be considered in order to
measure and monitor financial benefits, productivity gains, effective team integration,
sustainability/resource efficiency, disaster risk preparedness, and sustainability factors
throughout the life-cycle of assets?
(iii) How do existing procurement guidelines align with the defined KPIs and success criteria?
(iv) What are the tangible and intangible benefits of implementing BIM in the procurement of
building and infrastructure assets for different stakeholders?
This case study aims to gain insight into the uptake of BIM in complex projects during the asset
management stage. The interviews have been divided into two parts. Part I included three interviews
carried out on 06 February 2015 and aimed to understand “the journey so far”, drivers, success factors
and challenges as well as the expected role of BIM in the new system. Part II is to be carried out in July
2015 including 6-8 interviews after the BIM for asset management interface had been rolled out.
However, this section of the case study has now been postponed to be carried out as part of a new
SBEnrc research project 2.46 Whole-of-life Value of Constructed Assets through Digital Technologies. The
interviewees of Part I represented the client and are involved at different levels of decision making that
pertain to the uptake, development and implementation of the new system.
Prior to the interviews, the research team received several documents that were considered important
background for developing the interview questions and this report. These documents included contract
guidelines, presentations, technical specifications and model management plan.
This research was carried out under a confidentiality agreement with the Sydney Opera House Trust and
therefore the findings presented in this report are anonymised and have also been reviewed and
approved for distribution to the Project Steering Group by a designated representative of the SOH.
Additional supporting documentation was provided by SOH representatives and interviewees. These
documents were analysed and coded into emerging topics following a similar methodology to the
interviews analysis. Relevant information was then compared to the interviews findings and included in
the present report. The source of the documentation and parties mentioned has also been anonymised
The document analysis aimed to find support for claims made during the interviews as well as expand
the area of research. This report also includes information that although it does not relate directly to the
questions used for the interview, it was deemed useful towards achieving the overall research project
objectives expressed in the project schedule and research protocol.
3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
SBEnrc would like to express its gratitude to the Sydney Opera House for allowing access to their staff
and documentation to carry out this research. The research team would also like to acknowledge the
time donated by the interviewees who were open and cooperative at all times.
Additionally, SBEnrc would like to acknowledge the funding and support provided by SBEnrc core
partners: Aurecon, Curtin University, Government of Western Australia, Griffith University, John
Holland, New South Wales Roads and Maritime Services, Queensland Government and Swinburne
University of Technology.
The Sydney Opera House (SOH) is an iconic Australian building of late modern architecture (Figure 1). Its
history starts in 1956 when the NSW Government called an open-ended international design
competition based on broad specifications without design parameters or cost limit. The winning design
was created by Jørn Utzon who gave Australia a challenging, graceful piece of urban sculpture in
patterned tiles, glistening in the sunlight and invitingly aglow at night. Since the start, design and
construction were closely intertwined characterised by an exceptional collaborative and innovative
environment (Sydney Opera House, 2015).
Nowadays, it has been estimated that Sydney Opera House is worth AUD4.6 billion and contributes
AUD775 million annually to the Australian economy (Deloitte, 2013). In 2014, the Sydney Opera House
generated almost AUD100 million directly from sales, services and sponsorship, and spent AUD32.3
million on building maintenance (Sydney Opera House, 2014c).
It’s been a long, long path… from the BIM and FM as a business enabler, turning the dream
into reality has been probably more difficult and taken longer than we would have thought.
The roof of the SOH is made by 1600 segments each weighing an average of 10 tons and the outside of
the roof is clad with 5,400 precast tile panels. The highest point of the roof is 67 meters above sea level
and the whole building has 10,000 tile bolts which had to be surveyed to a guaranteed accuracy of ±
3mm so that the fixing brackets could be pre-set before each tile lid was lifted (Elfick, 2010).
During construction it was found that the calculation work to process field data and generate reports
would limit the response time of the project team at critical stages of the project. The usual time
necessary to calculate a typical rib deformation was over a week. The requirement however was to
Figure 2 Computer Report - Layout was point code followed by XYZ position and then dimensions from the
reference frame of that part of the structure (Elfick, 2010)
The construction program spanned over 15 years and the executed drawings and operational manuals
provided at the end of construction were incomplete and unreliable as to their accuracy. This meant
that in year 2000 the SOH had all the concept designs but lacked many of the as-built drawings, and two
rooms stacked floor to ceiling with plans and microfilms and copies of books and everything else as the
information database. At the time, individuals had started to amass documents related to their roles
and, as they left the organisation, this information was often lost. This led the SOH to develop an
information and documentation policy that required all employees to deliver all their documentation to
a central information office. Here the documents were manually compared to those in record to avoid
duplication of information and ensure version controls.
The SOH also had the Sydney Opera House Technical Documents Database (TDOC database) established
in the mid 1990’s to collate information about the engineering elements of the building. It was also used
to index a large set of microfilmed engineering drawings, covering the building’s engineering disciplines
(Sydney Opera House, 2014b).
In 2004, the SOH started a collaborative research project with the CRC for Construction Innovation to
research FM practices and demonstrate FM as a business enabler. This project combined three research
streams related to digital modelling, services procurement and benchmarking (Kivits & Furneaux, 2013).
At the end of this project in 2007, the CRC for Construction Innovation proposed that the Sydney Opera
House should develop a BIM model. This system was to be capable of integrating information from
disparate software systems and hard copy, and combining this with a spatial 3D computer-aided design
(CAD)/geographic information system (GIS) platform. The objective was that the SOH would be able to
mine data to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their FM strategy as it related to their Total
Asset Management (TAM) Plan and Strategic Asset Maintenance (SAM) Plan (CRC for Construction
Innovation, 2007).
The CRC for Construction Innovation proposal included a BIM for FM framework supported by an open
data exchange standard across multiple applications, use of data mining as an information gathering
tool and integrated strategic elements. It also included the use of performance benchmarking to
develop effective Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for an integrated performance hierarchy
assessment model. Some of the suggestions were: condition assessment (building structure and
services, public spaces, internal fittings and finishes); energy management (rate of consumption and
management); accessibility (security and information for visitors); and contractor’s performance (quality
of service, safety, timeliness and compliance) (CRC for Construction Innovation, 2007).
This research concluded that tests with partial digital FM model data demonstrated that the creation of
a complete Sydney Opera House digital FM model is realistic, but subject to resolution of compliance and
detailed functional support by participating software applications (CRC for Construction Innovation,
2007).
Following this work, the SOH team developed a set of BIM for FM objectives divided into four
categories:
In 2009, the design work undertaken on the Vehicle Access and Pedestrian Safety (VAPS) project which
contains roadway and tunnelling elements provided the SOH with an opportunity to test the use of a
fully integrated BIM approach to construction. All the outputs of this project were required in formats
that were highly interoperable in preparation for the implementation of a BIM asset management
system in the near future.
In 2011, SOH issued their BIM Guidelines to assist organisations working on various building projects
(including VAPS) who would prepare engineering documentation files for them upon completion of their
contractual obligations. This effort was driven by the belief that to use BIM effectively… and for the
benefits of its use to be realised, the quality of communication between the different participants in the
construction process needs to be improved. If the information required is available when it is needed, and
the quality of that information is appropriate, then the construction process can be improved… For this
to happen, there must be a common understanding of building processes and of the information that is
needed for and that results from their execution (Linning, 2011).
In this guide, SOH established their general BIM objective as: to build up an accurate, reliable, and
relevant integrated building model of the Sydney Opera House complex to support operational
management, building and service system alterations and additions and asset and maintenance
management… This is proposed to be achieved by progressive incremental development of a master
model, in accordance with operational, logistic and financial constraints (Linning, 2011)
In 2011, the SOH also issued the BIM Guidelines for Construction Phases as an adaption of the U.S.
Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) and NATSPEC BIM Guidelines, with an emphasis on construction and
final deliverables (Sydney Opera House, 2011). In 2012, the Scottish Ten1 used laser-mapping technology
to capture a point cloud map of the external structure, the main auditorium and some sections at the
back of the SOH. This meant taking over 950 laser scans and 56,000 digital photos to produce the
geospatially accurate point cloud (Figure 3) (Linning, 2014a).
1
The Scottish Ten project commenced in late 2009, and set out to digitally document Scotland’s five World Heritage
sites and five international heritage sites, in order to better understand how to conserve and manage them. It has
been delivered as a partnership between HS and DDS (Scottish Ten, 2015).
We see BIM as a fairly key component of our future strategy for managing the building
In 2013, the SOH started to develop a concerted strategy to implement a BIM interface solution for
asset management. The team first requested an expression of interest submission through a pre-
qualification questionnaire from which a short list of six organisations would be able to submit tenders.
This second stage required consultants to create a detailed technical specification document of the
proposed interface (Sydney Opera House, 2014b). Part of this effort included an end-user wish list
survey, where system users were provided with the opportunity to express any capabilities that they
would like to see in the new system. This solution will act as a centralised database and graphical
interface for data associated with the management of the SOH asset and services, and is based on a BIM
management plan. This document was developed through extensive research across international
documents prepared by EAC (UK), American Institute of Architects, Revit, and previous SOH
documentation (Sydney Opera House, 2014a).
The BIM for FM solution implementation will occur in two stages in order to test the robustness of the
solution provided, and evolve the data linked to the model: (i) fully functional BIM and basic functions of
the solution; and (ii) additional modules of functional requirements (Sydney Opera House, 2014b). The
first stage is expected to be rolled out in early September 2015.
The new BIM asset management system has the following purposes:
The SOH is currently considering using Omniclass2 classification across the asset management system,
integrating even financial and human resources systems. This classification is currently part of the
standards used for construction projects (Sydney Opera House, 2011). They have also used the British
2
The OmniClass Construction Classification System is a classification system for the construction industry,
developed by the Construction Standards Institute (CSI) and is used as a classification structure for electronic
databases... OmniClass incorporates other existing systems currently in use, including MasterFormat™ for work
results, UniFormat for elements, and EPIC (Electronic Product Information Cooperation) for structuring products
(Sydney Opera House, 2011).
Figure 5 The BIM interface Base Functionality (Sydney Opera House, 2014b)
The CRC for Construction Innovation recommended developing KPIs that link service outcomes to asset
condition and the role of FM as business enabler as well as using the model to support procurement
processes. Based on this, they suggested the following service and asset KPI as examples (CRC for
Construction Innovation, 2007):
backlog liabilities
cleaning and waste management
energy
grounds
maintenance
operating costs
parking
recycling
refurbishment
security
statistical data
water usage
Cost of:
o administration
o airconditioning
o carparking
o cleaning
o electricity
o energy management
o fire protection
o gas and oil
o insurance
o landscaping
o lifts and escalators
o pest control
o repairs and maintenance
o security
o supervision
4.4. DRIVERS
The ability to own, reuse, and properly manage building data throughout the facility
lifecycle accrues significant advantages for the Principal. Consequently, the accurate
creation, management, and stewardship of building information during project creation
is of utmost importance. Data created during construction and refined during the project
execution process provides a valuable resource for facility management (FM).
Sydney Opera House (2011)
This research identified the following drivers for developing and implementing the BIM for asset
management system in the SOH.
3
Building Fabric Index (BFI) and a Building Presentation Index (BPI), is a method the SOH has adopted to measure
general appearance, tidiness and cleanliness of functional spaces of the building (Linning, 2011).
BIM has been seen as an opportunity to merge a number of disparate sources of information currently
available in different databases… just having one system where the data is fully integrated and you know
is consistently working off the same baseline rather than having multiple systems (SOH Interviewee,
2015). This ensures consistency and reliability across data sets.
4.4.3. SAFETY
Once the new asset management system is in place, the team expects to use the BIM model to plan and
manage emergency responses as well as hazardous material tracking. It is envisioned that eventually
emergency responders may have access to live feed of the CCTV cameras in the affected areas through
the asset management interface as well as use the model for way finding and pinpointing hazardous
materials.
4.4.5. SUSTAINABILITY
The building consumes significant quantities of energy and water. It is expected that the use of BIM will
help SOH achieve their environmental sustainability targets. The second stage of development would
aim to, for example, link the consumption meter to the model in order to produce better analyses and
projections that can improve these aspects. By integrating a number of parameters such as cost,
efficiency and other, it is expected that the system will help provide a more holistic approach to
management and sourcing of plant and equipment that is also more economic.
4.5. CHALLENGES
The following section summarises the challenges identified over the course of the last 10 years in the
development of their BIM for asset management strategy and system.
The SOH team often required software capabilities that did not exist commercially and had to wait for
the industry to “catch-up”. For example, during the VAPS project, a document type “BIM” was required
within the project management software system. This led to the team approaching their project
management software vendor who later developed the document type for use within the software.
In general, it was the view of the interviewees that the most challenging factor which led to the 10-year-
long journey was the fact that the industry did not have commercially available software that were able
to provide the capabilities required by the SOH.
Additionally, commercial software copyright limitations were also mentioned. It has been important to
the SOH to not be “locked-in” with a provider. One of the requirements that has driven the
development of their BIM asset management system has been to be able to modify the software and
model as new needs are identified and technology progresses. The model should be easy to use and
update. This requirement is driven by the fact that the building is in constant flux and the model will
need to be changed in-house frequently. It was observed that common software platforms such as Revit
tend to be too complex for asset management and some software developers have struggled with the
idea of allowing the SOH to carry out in-house updates to the system. Most important is that the
solution and the technical document and information database are flexible and scalable. It is important…
that they can add modules of different functionality to the solution, as well as adding more searchable
databases and tables (Sydney Opera House, 2014b).
In relation to software, it was also identified that a large proportion of the commercial BIM software
packages have a specific focus on design and construction phases. However, the asset management and
Additionally, being able to understand what were the real capabilities of the organisations who
submitted an expression of interest was also considered a challenge because of the variety of
approaches offered. The SOH addressed this challenge by engaging BIMe as expert consultant for the
evaluation process.
Senior members of the construction teams have also had to adapt to the new way of working. Some of
these roles showed resistance to a paperless project environment as well as tended to attribute any
failure to the use of BIM. Resistance to change is also seen as a challenge due to the generational shift;
new workforce generations will expect to work on 3D digital integrated environments and are likely to
feel frustrated if forced to work on 2D due to senior management’s resistance to this technology. On the
The SOH is considered a unique building due to its use pattern and type of equipment requirements.
Therefore to apply a standard governance framework becomes challenging as well as predicting the
useful life of plant and equipment. The SOH is opened seven days a week with equipment running
depending on the day’s performance schedule, therefore typical equipment use projections are not
applicable. This has led the SOH to seek and develop more specialised approaches to asset management
and governance.
We have unique needs and if we were to just go with a vanilla solution then the air conditioner would
turn on at seven o’clock in the morning and turn off eleven o’clock at night and we would have consumed
all that power we didn't need to (SOH Interviewee, 2015).
The following were identified as success factors in the development of a BIM for asset management
strategy.
Because the building was built from the best practice… we’re always questioning I guess
and making sure are we doing it at the best?
The iconic nature of the building has also inspired a significant level of attention from different
stakeholders to seek establishing links to the SOH and contributing to the BIM for the asset
management development journey. People have assisted us and included us in the conversations of
what they have been doing and what they can do to assist us (SOH Interviewee, 2015).
The SOH has been in this BIM journey for ten years which has allowed them to carefully choose the
standards and processes that best suit the needs of the precinct as well as becoming a well-informed
client. This is seen as a risk mitigation strategy by allowing the SOH team to learn from the experiences
of previous implementers and develop a system that perfectly suits their needs. Additionally, the SOH
has seen becoming more informed and involved as a necessity due to the industry lagging behind in
developing BIM solutions for asset management. This has also been driven by the observed tendency of
commercial developers to promote “one-size-fits-all” solutions that would not suit the needs of the
SOH. This role of well-informed and innovative client is often acknowledged by the industry by inviting
SOH representatives to speak at conferences about BIM for FM as well as by the New South Wales
Architect who has shown a focus on implementing BIM.
It was acknowledged that taking this more proactive approach requires more time investment in staying
up-to-date with industry progress and requires a constant awareness of the consequences of decisions
made, so we’re not painting ourselves into a corner in a dead-end solution (SOH Interviewee, 2015).
However, the benefits are considered to offset the cost. This approach will also help the SOH to
understand the reasons behind decisions made in the system development and make better informed
decisions in future scenarios.
Being a more involved client has also led the SOH to introduce non-price criteria in their tender
evaluation which include the talent and skills that tenderers may bring to the SOH. The SOH has also
developed a service performance scoring and management system based on the work initiated with the
CRC for Construction Innovation.
The decision-making process in the SOH regarding BIM system requirements and development are
based on management trusting their team knowledge-based recommendations and self-education
about BIM through attending industry forums and staying up-to-date. Additionally, the SOH has
endeavoured in maintaining close ties with industry groups in order to learn from them.
If you want to succeed you have to take everyone on the journey with you.
Stakeholder engagement and active dialogue are key parts of decision-making and learning processes in
the SOH. This open-to-suggestions approach is reflected on their guidelines stating that to achieve this
final FMI system, Sydney Opera House BD&M portfolio is open to any suggestions and encourages
conversations to advance BIM and its adoption (Sydney Opera House, 2011). An example of this was the
BIM for asset management scope development. Part of this process included a needs analysis and
internal survey followed up by a workshop with end-users to gather a wish-list of the scope of the new
system. In another example, the SOH started a peer-review process of the operation and maintenance
information system. Outcomes of this effort were later used to produce standard templates.
The SOH also carries out a great deal of research into international best practices and published works in
order to develop their own practice guidelines.
The following challenges during implementation are expected to be addressed in the coming months.
5. BIBLIOGRAPHY
CRC for Construction Innovation, 2007. FM as a Business Enabler, Brisbane: Cooperative Research
Centre for Construction Innovation.
Deloitte, 2013. How Do you Value an Icon? The Sydney Opera House: Economic, Cultural and Digital
Value, Sydney: Deloitte.
Kivits, R. A. & Furneaux, C., 2013. BIM: Enabling Sustainability and Asset Management through
Knowledge Management. The Scientific World Journal.
Linning, C., 2011. BIM Guidelines - Basic Introduction, Sydney: Sydney Opera House.
Linning, C., 2014a. BIM4FM at Sydney Opera House. Sydney, Facility Management Association (FMA) of
Australia Conference.
Linning, C., 2014b. FM Exemplar Project 2014 SOH update, Sydney: Sydney Opera House.
Sydney Opera House, 2011. BIM Guideline: Construction Phase (+COBIE), Sydney: Sydney Opera House.
Sydney Opera House, 2014a. Professional Services Contractor Building Information Management Sydney
Opera House: Model Management Plan, Sydney: Sydney Opera House.
Sydney Opera House, 2014b. Building Information Management Sydney Opera House - Technical
Specification for BIM Interface, Sydney: Sydney Opera House.
Sydney Opera House, 2014c. Sydney Opera House Annual Report 2013-2014, Sydney: Sydney Opera
House.
Figure 6 Objectives under Digital Modelling. The “Delivered to Date” column is a brief summary of what has
transpired to date and what is being implemented. “Progress to Achievement” provides a graphical
representation of implementation (Linning, 2014b).
Figure 7 Objectives under Oriented Architecture. The “Delivered to Date” column is a brief summary of what has
transpired to date and what is being implemented. “Progress to Achievement” provides a graphical
representation of implementation (Linning, 2014b)
www.sbenrc.com.au
September 2015