Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Theoretical Framework Equity Theory

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

Equity Theory
Equity theory recognizes that individuals are concerned not only with the absolute
amount of rewards they receive for their efforts, but also with the relationship of the
amount to what others receive (Armstrong, 2010). Based on one’s inputs, such as
effort, experience, commitment, education and competence, one can compare
outcomes such as levels, increases, compensation, recognition and other factor. One of
the prominent theories with respect to equity theory was developed through the work of
J.S. Adams. Adams’ theory (Adams, 1963) is perhaps the most rigorously developed
statement of how individuals evaluate social exchange relationships (Armstrong, 2010).
The major components of exchange relationships in this theory are inputs and
outcomes or the performance and compensation. In a situation where a person
exchanges his or her services for pay, inputs may include previous work experience,
education, effort on the job and training. Outcomes are those factors that result from the
exchange. The most important outcome is likely to be pay with outcomes such as
incentives, supervisory treatment, job assignments, benefits and status symbols also
taken into consideration.

Equity theory rests upon three main assumptions (Carrell & Dittrich, 1978):
• The theory holds that people develop beliefs about what constitutes a fair and
equitable return for their contributions to their jobs;

 The theory assumes that people tend to compare what they perceive to be
the1exchange they have with employers.1

 The theory assumes that when people believe that their own treatment is not
equitable, relative to the exchange theory they perceive others to be making,
they will be in motivated to take actions they deem appropriate. This concept of
equity is most often interpreted in work organizations as a positive association
between an employee’s performance on the job and the compensations that
individual receives.

Equity theory states, in effect, that people will be better motivated if they are treated
equitably and de-motivated if they are treated inequitably (Armstrong, 2010). 1In this
theory, INPUTS serve as the Job performance of the employees and OUTPUTS serve
as the Compensation strategies within an organization.
INPUTS EQUITY OUTPUTS

(PERFORMANCE) (COMPENSATION
STRATEGIES)
Theoretical Review

The relationship between compensation practices and employee performance was


viewed from the perspectives of a number of theories relevant to the study. For the
purpose of the study, the researcher reviewed a number of theories as applied by
various researchers globally. The theories are further critiqued on the basis of empirical
evidence found in literature on the subject matter of compensation practices and
employee performance.

Expectancy Theory

According to (Armstrong, 2010), in the expectancy theory, motivation is likely to be


when there is a perceived and usable relationship between and outcome, with the
outcome being seen as a means of rewarding needs. In other words, there must be a
relationship between a certain reward and what has to be done to achieve it. This theory
is very important in the context of this research. It is instrumental especially when
designing performance-based employee wellbeing programmes. This theory helps
explain why an organization’s staff would feel confident that they can grow in the same
organization, hence remain there or seek development elsewhere by exiting the
organisation. 3

You might also like