Acupoint Stimulation For Acne
Acupoint Stimulation For Acne
Acupoint Stimulation For Acne
Hui-juan Cao, PhD,* Guo-yan Yang, BSMed,* Yu-yi Wang, BSMed, and Jian-ping Liu, PhD
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION the face; anterior trunk; and upper back.1 Mild acne is
characterized by comedones, or blackheads, which are di-
Centre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
*Both authors contributed equally.
173
174 CAO ET AL.
those on the skin and emotional scars can last a lifetime. review that evaluated the clinical evidence of all types of
Acne affects 80% of adolescents (most commonly from 12 acupoint-stimulation therapies. This systematic review
years of age), but it can also affect 54% of adult women was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of
and 40% of adult men (primarily those in their early or all acupoint-stimulation techniques used to treat acne
mid-20s).2 vulgaris.
Acne treatment is aimed at decreasing inflammation of
the lesions and accompanying discomfort with the ultimate
goals of improving appearance and preventing or minimizing METHODS
scarring and emotional distress.3 Effective prescription
medications are available, although side-effects—such as Inclusion Criteria
local irritation, teratogenicity, dry skin, hyperlipidemia,
and increased risk of depression—are reported.4,5 Over- Parallel-group RCTs were included in any data analysis
the-counter preparations and herbal remedies, as well as with interventions for the treatment of acne vulgaris using
skin- hygiene routines and dietary modifications may be any acupoint stimulation technique—such as acupuncture,
recommended by dermatologists or, more often, are self- moxibustion, cupping, acupoint injection, and acupoint
prescribed.4 catgut embedding—compared with no treatment, placebo,
In China, in addition to prescription medications, tradi- or conventional pharmaceutical medication. Comparisons
tional Chinese therapies are used to treat acne. One such also included a combination of acupoint-stimulation tech-
therapy is acupoint stimulation. Several methods can be niques, plus other therapies, versus the same other therapies
applied: acupuncture with needles; moxibustion, which in- alone. Participants who were diagnosed with acne vulgaris,
volves the controlled burning of material, typically mugwort or papulopustular, inflammatory, adolescent, or polymor-
(Artemisia vulgaris) herb, at certain points or areas of the phic acne—regardless of gender, age, and ethnicity—were
body surface; cupping therapy, which involves applying included. Primary outcome measures were reduction of
suction by placing a vacuumized, usually by fire, cup or jar signs and symptoms and presence of adverse effects. Sec-
on acupoints or affected body surfaces to induce local hy- ondary outcome measures included post-treatment evalua-
peremia or hemostasis; acupoint injection, which involves tion, participants’ self-assessment of change in lesions after
injecting medication into an acupuncture point; and acu- treatment, psychosocial outcomes, and quality of life (QoL)
point embedding, which involves embedding in the skin measurements.
over the acupoint a small needle(s), or medicated catgut.
Acupoint-stimulation methods are based on the Tradi- Identification and Selection of Studies
tional Chinese Medicine (TCM) view that acne is caused by Searches were conducted in the China Network Knowl-
any or a combination of several pathogenic factors. These edge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1979–2012), Chinese Scientific
include intense Lung Heat or Stomach Heat, Damp–Heat Journals Database (VIP, 1989–2012), Wan Fang Database
with Blood Stasis, and Qi (vital energy) Stagnation. As the (1985–2012), Chinese Biomedicine (CBM, 1978–2012),
condition becomes protracted, pathogenic Heat rises and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL,
accumulates in the skin and tissues, which brings on the 1999–2012), and PubMed (1966–2012). All searches ended
lesions.6 in May 2012. Search terms included acupuncture, electro-
Potential mechanisms of acupoint stimulation for acne acupuncture, auricular therapy, acupoint, meridian, combined
are to relieve Heat toxicity, eliminate Dampness, regulate with acne vulgaris and acne. Unpublished postgraduate theses
the Qi and Blood, and enhance immunologic function.6 in Chinese databases were also searched. No language re-
Some studies also mention that acupuncture can stimulate strictions were imposed. Three authors (H.-j.C., G.-y.Y., and
and balance androgen levels to inhibit excess secretion of Y.-y.W.) independently selected studies for eligibility and
the sebaceous gland.7 checked against the inclusion criteria.
Articles with clinical observations have reported the
efficacy of acupoint-stimulation therapies for acne. A
systematic review7 assessing seventeen TCM randomized
Data Extraction and Quality Assessment
controlled trials (RCTs) suggests that acupuncture and Three authors (H.-j.C., G.-y.Y., and Y.-y.W.) indepen-
moxibustion are better than conventional pharmaceutical dently extracted population and intervention characteristics
medication for reducing symptoms of acne. Another sys- using self-designed data extraction templates. Disagreements
tematic review8 involving twenty-three trials of topical and were resolved by discussion with another author ( J.-p.L).
oral complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) Risk of bias for each study was conducted in accord
concluded that, poor methodological quality aside, the with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of
evidence suggests that many of these therapies are bio- Intervention.9 Six criteria were applied, as follows: (1) se-
logically plausible. However, there has been no systematic lection bias (random-sequence generation and allocation
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 175
Data Analysis
Dichotomous data were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with
a 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous data were ex-
pressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Statis-
tical heterogeneity was tested by the I2 test. RevMan 5.1
software (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for data ana-
lyses. Meta-analysis was used if the trials had acceptable FIG. 1. Search strategy flow chart.
homogeneity (I2 < 85%) of study design, participants, in-
terventions, controls, and outcome measures. Meta-analyses
were performed using fixed-effect 9 models (I2 < 25%) for moxibustion, and combination of acupoint-stimulation
homogeneous studies and using random-effects methods therapies and herbal medicine. Controls included pharma-
prior to fixed-effect models when there was substantial ceutical medications and herbal medicine alone. Courses of
heterogeneity (25% < I2 < 85%). treatment ranged from 1 to 12 weeks.
Degree of reduction in clinical symptoms (known as the
cure rate) as the major outcome measurement was reported in
RESULTS all forty-three included trials. Responses to interventions were
classified as cure, markedly effective, effective, and ineffec-
Description of Studies tive.53 Cure was defined as lesions totally faded (or > 95%
faded) and only mild pigmentation and scars remaining.
After primary searches of six databases, 535 citations
Markedly effective was defined as lesions faded > 60% and
were identified. We excluded 484 studies because they
severity of lesions was alleviated. Effective was defined as
did not meet inclusion criteria. Full-text articles for 51
lesions faded 20%–59% and severity of lesions was reduced.
studies were retrieved. Finally, 43 trials10–52 were in-
Ineffective was defined as lesions faded < 20% or worsening
cluded in this review (Fig. 1). Characteristics of included
of lesions. Four trials13,19,43,45 counted the number of skin
trials are listed in Table 1. Among the included trials,
lesions, three trials14,42,45 reported QoL scores, two trials 42,43
fourteen studies11–15,19,21,26,31,35,42,43,45,46 were unpublished
reported recurrence rates, and three trials14,42,43 listed labo-
master’s theses.
ratory test results.
The forty-three trials involved a total of 3453 patients,
with an average of 40 participants in each group. Age ran-
Methodological Quality
ged between 13 and 43, and duration of disease varied from
1 week to 17 years. Ten trials 22,23,25,27,29,38,39,47,48,50 did not According to the current authors’ predefined quality-
report diagnostic criteria, two trials10,30 used international assessment criteria, all forty-three trials were evaluated
diagnostic criteria, and thirty-three trials reported using one as having a high risk of bias (Fig. 2). Study sample size
of four TCM diagnostic criteria.53–56 Of the thirty-three varied from 20 to 112 participants, with an average of
trials, six trials 24,36,40,41,43,52 did not report sources for di- 40 patients per group. None of the trials reported
agnostic criteria, and eight trials11,15,17,20,31,34,37,51 used self- sample-size calculation methodology. Fifteen tri-
established diagnostic criteria for acne. als11,12,14,15,19,21,26,30,32,35,42,44–46,48 described randomiza-
Interventions included acupuncture (electroacupuncture, tion procedures, using random number tables or computer
auricular acupuncture, and ear point pressure), cupping generation of random numbers, but only 1 trial14 reported
therapy, acupoint injection, acupoint catgut embedding, adequate allocation concealment. The majority of trials
176 CAO ET AL.
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Chen 200710 Chinese 10/26 8/22 22.13 21.63 2.61 y 1.96 y Yes
criteria &
Western
criteria
Chen 200911 Nonstandard 30* 60* 22.93 – 6.03 21.83 – 6.07 4.31 – 3.24 y 2.60 – 1.92 y Yes
Chinese
criteria
Cheng 201012 Chinese 27/23 26/24 21.2 (14–35) 21.5 (13–36) 6.5 m (1 w–5 y) 6.3 m (1 w–6 y) Yes
criteria56
Fan 201013 Chinese 15/10 11/15 22.24 – 4.087 22.32 – 4.534 1 y–3 y 1 y–3 y Yes
criteria53
Gong 200514 Chinese 9/11 6/14 21.3 21.5 2.89 y 3.57 y Yes
criteria53
Han 201015 Nonstandard 18/28 14/33 25.83 24.68 2.35 y 2.15 y Yes
Chinese
criteria
He 200916 Chinese 8/16 10/12 25.2 (17–41) 23.6 (16–38) 20 d–16 y 1 m–17 y Yes
criteria54
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 177
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
(continued)
178 CAO ET AL.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Hong 201117 Nonstandard 8/11 7/11) 24 (15–36) 23 (14–35) 2.5 (1–10) y 2.2 (1–11) y Yes
Chinese
criteria
Huang 201119 Chinese 7/23 7/23 19.23 – 3.05 19.03 – 3.18 11.57 d – 7.55 d 11.47 d – 6.72 d Yes
criteria54
Jin 200923 NR 14/18 12/14 24.5 (18–24) 23 (16–30) (4.7 – 1.2) y (4.8 – 1.14) y Yes
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 179
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
(continued)
180 CAO ET AL.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Li 200926 Chinese 0/29 0/30 25.48 – 4.09 25.57 – 4 .67 < 13 y < 13y NR
criteria53
Li 201128 Chinese 10/13 10/12 25.3 (18–39) 24.5 (18–35) 19.17 (1–65 m) 19.36 (2–67m) NR
criteria53
Lu 201131 Nonstandard 21/39 18/42 20.17 – 4.48 22.17 – 4.12 1 m–10 y 1 m–10 y Yes
Chinese (13–34) (14–30)
criteria
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 181
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
(continued)
182 CAO ET AL.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Song 201134 Nonstandard 34/26 36/24 20.3 (14–30) 21.1 (13–31) 389 d (7 d–3 y) 392 d (5 d–3 y) Yes
Chinese
criteria
Wang 201135 Chinese 10./14 11/13 22.58 (18–32) 22.33 (18_33) >2 w >2 w Yes
criteria53
Wu 200840 Chinese 9/21 7/23 26.13 – 2.54 24.83 – 3.07 15.20w – 136 w 14.53 w + 187 w Yes
criteria
without
source
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 183
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
(continued)
184 CAO ET AL.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Xie 201142 Chinese 7/22 6/22 25.6 25.3 6 m–10 y 5 m–10 y Yes
criteria55 (29.6–21.5) (29.3–21.3)
Xie 200843 Chinese 23/7 25/5 20.70 – 4.35 22.20 – 4.27 1.70y – 2.46 y 2.30y – 2.59 y Yes
criteria
without
source
Xu44 2009 Chinese 37/25 17/13 21.3 21.5 1.72 y 1.67 y Yes
criteria54
Yan46 2006 Chinese 5/27 6/26 22.97 (17–43) 22.63 (18–38) 2 m–13 y 2 w–13 y Yes
criteria53
Zhang49 2007 Chinese 29/27 28/28 22.4 (16–34) 22.1 (15–35) 2.2 y 2.3 y Yes
criteria54 (15 d–10 y) (16 d–11 y)
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 185
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
(continued)
186 CAO ET AL.
Table 1. (Continued)
Sample size (M/F) Sample age (range, y) Disease duration (average) Baseline
Study 1st Diagnostic data
author & ref. criteria I C I C I C comparable?
Zhang51 2006 Nonstandard 27/51 30/52 24.2 22.7 1 y–10 y 6 m–* 7 y Yes
Chinese
criteria
Zhang52 2010 Chinese 57/55 51/47 22.5 – 4.3 21.3 – 4.5 3.3 m – 2.1 m 3.6 m – 2.3 m Yes
criteria
without
source
compared acupoint stimulation therapies and pharmaceutical ference in the number of cured patients between
medication; thus, blinding could not be applied for patients acupuncture plus herbal medicine and herbal medicine
and researchers. Six trials13,25,26,32,45,46 reported the number alone (RR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.19–2.14; P = 0.002; random
of dropouts, but none used intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. model; I2 = 46%; 9 trials), and between acupuncture plus
None of the trials mentioned sources of financial support. herbal facial mask and herbal facial mask alone (RR: 2.14;
95% CI: 1.29–3.55; P = 0.003; fixed model; I2 = 0%; 2 tri-
als). No difference was seen in the comparison between
Effect Estimates
acupuncture and pharmaceutical medications (RR: 1.49;
Because of variations in study quality, participant char- 95% CI: 0.82–2.73; P = 0.19; random model; I2 = 54%;
acteristics, intervention types, controls, and outcome mea- 5 trials), and in the comparison between acupuncture plus
sures, results of most trials could not be synthesized by acupoint injection and acupoint injection alone (RR: 2.00;
quantitative methods. Therefore, qualitative methods were 95% CI: 0.64–6.29, P = 0.24; fixed model; I2 = 0%; 2 trials).
used (Table 2). Three trials13,19,45 reported changes in skin-lesion count.
One study13 that used a skin-lesion scoring system,53
Therapeutic effect of acupuncture. Therapeutic ef- showed that acupuncture was superior to pharmaceutical
fect of acupuncture for acne was evaluated in 22 studies. Five medication for reducing the skin-lesion area (MD: - 26.95;
studies13–16,32 compared acupuncture with pharmaceutical 95% CI: - 31.84 to - 22.06; P < 0.00001; 1 trial). The re-
medications. Nine trials 12,19,24,25,27,28,44–46 compared acu- maining two trials compared acupuncture plus herbal
puncture plus herbal medicine with herbal medicine alone. medicine with herbal medicine alone. One of the trials45
Two trials21,33 compared acupuncture plus acupoint injection found that a combination of acupuncture and herbal medi-
with acupoint injection alone. Two trials23,41 compared acu- cine was better than herbal medicine alone for reducing
puncture plus a herbal facial mask with a facial mask alone. skin lesions (MD: - 13.88; 95% CI: - 19.17 to - 8.59;
One trial18 compared acupuncture plus cupping therapy with P < 0.00001, 1 trial), while the other trial19 showed no dif-
cupping therapy alone. One trial35 compared acupuncture plus ference between the comparison treatments (MD: - 0.97;
guasha (scraping) with guasha alone. One trial26 compared 95% CI: - 3.06 to 1.12; P = 0.36; 1 trial).
acupuncture plus herbal medicine and acupoint injection with QoL (Acne-QoL)57 was assessed in one trial,14 finding
herbal medicine and acupoint injection alone. that, compared with pharmaceutical medication, acupunc-
Nineteen trials 12–16,18,19,21,23–25,27,28,32,33,41,44–46 were in- ture appeared to significantly improve self-perception (MD:
cluded in four meta-analyses. There were a significant dif- 3.40; 95% CI: 2.16–4.64; P < 0.00001; 1 trial), social
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 187
Table 1. (Continued)
Duration of
Intervention Control treatment (w) Outcome Adverse events
function (MD: 2.30; 95% CI: 1.23–3.37; P < 0.0001; 1 trial), Therapeutic effect of acupoint injection. Seven trials
and emotional function (MD 2.30; 95% CI: 0.74–3.86; evaluated the effect of acupoint injection for acne. Of the seven
P = 0.004; 1 trial). trials, three22,39,48 compared acupoint injection with pharma-
ceutical medication, and four trials compared acupoint injection
Therapeutic effect of cupping therapy. Ten trials plus other treatment with other treatment alone (pharmaceutical
evaluated the effectiveness of cupping therapy for acne. Of medication,29,47 acupuncture,42 and herbal medicine49).
the ten trials, four34,38,40,50 compared cupping therapy with Meta-analysis showed that acupoint injection used alone
pharmaceutical medications, three trials11,20,31 compared (RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.13–2.03; P = 0.006; fixed model;
cupping therapy plus herbal medicine with herbal medicine I2 = 0%; 3 trials) and combined with pharmaceutical
alone, two trials30,37 compared cupping plus acupuncture medication (RR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.12–1.99; P = 0.007; fixed
with acupuncture alone, and one trial17 compared cupping model, I2 = 0%; 2 trials) were significantly better than
plus a herbal facial mask with herbal facial mask alone.
Meta-analysis showed that cupping therapy was signifi-
cantly better than pharmaceutical medications, such as
tanshinone, tetracycline, and ketokonazole (RR: 2.11; 95%
CI: 1.45–3.07; P < 0.0001; fixed model; I2 = 6%, 4 trials).
Furthermore, cupping therapy combined with herbal medi-
cine (RR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.32–2.74; P = 0.0005; fixed model;
I2 = 0%; 3 trials) or acupuncture (RR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.12–
2.86; P = 0.01; fixed model; I2 = 6%; 2 trials) was superior to
herbal medicine or acupuncture alone. However, no differ-
ence was found between cupping plus a facial mask and a
facial mask alone (RR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.72–3.45; P = 0.25; 1 FIG. 2. Risk of bias graph shows the review authors’ judgments
trial). As each comparison had fewer than five trials, it was about each risk of bias item, presented as percentages across all
not meaningful to conduct a funnel-plot analysis. included studies.
188 CAO ET AL.
Table 2. Effect of Estimates of Acupoint Stimulation Treatment for Acne on Increasing Numbers
of Cured Patients in 43 Randomized Controlled Trials
1. Acupuncture
1.1 Acupuncture versus pharmaceutical medications
Fan 201013 Acupuncture with fire needling versus topical tazarotene cream & 2.43 [0.74, 7.99]
clindamycin gel
Gong 200514 Body acupuncture + ear acupressure versus licorsinc capsule 2.00 [0.20, 20.33]
Han 201015 Abdominal acupuncture versus isotretinoin capsule 0.80 [0.50, 1.27]
He 200916 Abdominal & facial acupuncture versus topical metronidazole 1.38 [0.45, 4.24]
solution
Mao 200832 Acupuncture versus minocycline 2.34 [1.23, 4.47]
Overall (random, I2 = 54%) RR 1.49 [0.82, 2.73] 0.19
Overall (fixed, I2 = 54%) RR 1.36 [0.97, 1.89] 0.07
1.2 Acupuncture + other treatments versus other treatments alone
1.2.1 Acupuncture + herbal medicine versus herbal medicine alone
Cheng 201012 Ear acupressure + Bai Xian Xia Ta Re tablet versus Bai Xian Xia Ta 1.33 [1.02, 1.74]
Re tablet alone
Huang 201119 Acupuncture + Pi Pa Qing Fei decoction & herbal facial mask 2.00 [0.78, 5.15]
versus herbal decoction & facial mask alone
Lan 200424 Acupuncture + Qin Shen Fen Ci Qing oral liquid versus Qin Shen 1.49 [0.75, 2.96]
Fen Ci Qing liquid alone
Li 199525 Auricular therapy + herbal decoction versus herbal decoction alone 2.86 [1.17, 6.97]
Li 201127 Acupuncture + herbal decoction and She Dan cream external 1.07 [0.79, 1.44]
application versus herbal decoction & topical She Dan cream
alone
Li 201128 Acupuncture + Yang He decoction versus Yang He decoction alone 5.10 [1.72, 15.11]
Xu 200944 Acupuncture + herbal decoction versus herbal decoction alone 1.37 [0.60, 3.12]
Xu 201045 Acupuncture + Pi Pa Qing Fei decoction versus Pi Pa Qing Fei 2.00 [0.67, 5.98]
decoction alone
Yan 200646 Body & facial acupuncture + herbal decoction & topical San Huang 2.00 [0.67, 5.98]
lotion versus herbal decoction & topical San Huang lotion alone
Overall (random, I2 = 46%) RR 1,60 [1.19, 2.14] 0.002
Overall (fixed, I2 = 46%) RR 1.56 [1.30, 1.89] < 0.00001
1.2.2 Acupuncture + acupoint injection versus acupoint injection alone
Huang 200921 Electroacupuncture plus autologous blood injection versus 2.00 [0.40, 10.11]
autologous blood injection alone
Mi 201133 Acupuncture plus acupoint injection versus acupoint injection alone 2.00 [0.40, 10.11]
Overall (random, I2 = 0%) RR 2.00 [0.64, 6.29] 0.24
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 2.00 [0.64, 6.29] 0.24
1.2.3 Acupuncture + cupping therapy versus cupping therapy alone
Hou 200918 Auricular therapy + wet cupping versus wet cupping alone 1.47 [1.00, 2.18] 0.05
1.2.4 Acupuncture + herbal facial mask versus herbal facial mask alone
Jin 200923 Body & facial acupuncture + herbal facial mask versus herbal facial 2.17 [0.64, 7.35]
mask alone
Xie 200941 Acupuncture + herbal facial mask versus herbal facial mask alone 2.13 [1.24, 3.68]
2
Overall (random, I = 0%) RR 2.14 [1.30, 3.52] 0.003
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 2.14 [1.29, 3.55] 0.003
1.2.5 Acupuncture plus guasha (scraping) versus guasha alone
Wang 201135 Acupuncture + guasha versus guasha alone 3.00 [0.92, 9.74] 0.07
(continued)
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 189
Table 2. (Continued)
Study 1st Effect estimates
author and ref. Comparisons [95%CI] P
1.2.6 Acupuncture plus herbal medicine and acupoint injection versus herbal medicine and acupoint injection
Li 200926 Auricular therapy + herbal decoction, topical medicine, acupoint 1.38 [0.55, 3.49] 0.50
injection versus herbal decoction, topical medicine, & acupoint
injection
2. Cupping therapy
2.1 Cupping + other interventions versus other interventions alone
2.1.1 Cupping + herbal medicine versus herbal medicine alone
Chen 200911 Wet cupping + herbal decoction versus herbal decoction alone 2.33 [0.67, 8.18]
Huang 201019 Wet cupping + herbal preparation, topical cream versus herbal 2.06 [1.33, 3.18]
preparation & topical cream
Lu 201131 Wet cupping + herbal decoction versus herbal decoction alone 1.44 [0.67, 3.12]
2
Overall (random, I = 0%) RR 1.92 [1.34, 2.76] 0.0004
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 1.91 [1.32, 2.74] 0.0005
2.1.2 wet cupping plus acupuncture versus acupuncture alone
Liu 200930 Flash cupping plus acupuncture versus acupuncture alone 1.91 [0.99, 3.72]
Wang 200737 Moving and wet cupping + acupuncture versus acupuncture alone 1.67 [0.87, 3.20]
Overall (random, I2 = 0%) RR 1,79 [1.12, 2.86] 0.01
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 1.79 [1.12, 2.86] 0.01
2.1.3 wet cupping plus facial mask versus facial mask
Hong 201117 Wet cupping + herbal facial mask versus herbal facial mask alone 1.58 [0.72, 3.45] 0.25
2.2 wet cupping versus pharmaceutical medication
Song 201134 Wet cupping versus vitamin B/metronidazole/erythromycin, 2.00 [0.80, 4.98]
metronidazole cream/benzoyl peroxide gel/sulfur/Mei Lu Xiao
Cuo cream
Wu 201038 Wet cupping versus tonshinone 1.07 [0.45, 2.56]
Wu 200840 Wet cupping versus tetracycline & ketoconazole cream 2.50 [1.31, 4.77]
Zhang 200850 Wet cupping versus tetracycline 2.75 [1.38, 5.48]
Overall (random, I2 = 6%) RR 2.10 [1.42, 3.11] 0.0002
Overall (fixed, I2 = 6%) RR 2.11 [1.45, 3.07] < 0.0001
3. Acupoint injection
3.1 Acupoint injection versus pharmaceutical medication
Huang 201122 Autologous blood acupoint injection versus viaminate capsule & 2.13 [1.09, 4.16]
tetracycline tablet
Wu 199839 Yu xing cao & dang gui acupoint injection versus metronidazole 1.67 [1.09, 2.56]
tablet & minocycline tablet
Yang 200848 Autologous blood acupoint injection versus erythromycin tablet & 1.29 [0.71, 2.36]
topical ketoconazole
Overall (random, I2 = 0%) RR 1.51 [1.13, 2.03] 0.006
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 1.64 [1.20, 2.24] 0.002
3.2 Acupoint injection + other treatment versus other treatment alone
3.2.1 Acupoint injection + pharmaceutical medication versus pharmaceutical medication alone
Liu 200829 Autologous blood acupoint injection + vitamin B/zinc gluconate 1.43 [1.03, 1.98]
tablet/Luo Hong enzyme capsule/Pi Pa Qing Fei decoction/acne
tincture & acupoint injection versus pharmaceutical medication
& acupoint injection
Yang 200847 Compound betamethasone injection with 2% lidocaine acupoint 1.78 [0.93, 3.40]
injection + viaminate & roxithromycin versus viaminate &
roxithromycin
Overall (random, I2 = 0%) RR 1.49 [1.12, 1.99] 0.007
Overall (fixed, I2 = 0%) RR 1.79 [1.12, 2.86] 0.01
(continued)
190 CAO ET AL.
Table 2. (Continued)
Study 1st Effect estimates
author and ref. Comparisons [95%CI] P
medication alone. However, no difference was found be- alone in increasing the number of cured patients (RR: 1.85;
tween acupoint injection combined with herbal medicine 95% CI: 1.24–2.77; P = 0.003; 1 trial). One study43 showed
(RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.83–1.41; P = 0.55; 1 trial) or acu- no difference between acupoint catgut embedding plus
puncture (RR: 1.45; 95% CI: 0.46–4.59; P = 0.53; 1 trial) pharmaceutical medication and pharmaceutical medication
compared with herbal medicine or acupuncture alone. As alone in increasing the number of cured patients (RR: 1.40;
each comparison had fewer than five trials, it was not 95% CI: 0.50–3.92; P = 0.52; 1 trial), reducing skin-lesion
meaningful to conduct a funnel-plot analysis. area (MD: 2.67; 95% CI: - 0.07 to 5.41; P = 0.06; 1 trial),
One trial 42 reported QoL scores and recurrence rate. and reducing recurrence rate (RR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.12–1.88;
Results showed no difference between acupoint injection P = 0.29; 1 trial).
plus acupuncture and acupuncture alone in improving QoL
(MD: - 1.76; 95% CI: - 3.80 to 0.28; P = 0.09; 1 trial) and Therapeutic effect of moxibustion. Meta-analysis of
in reducing recurrence rate (RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.03–1.60; two trials10,51 showed that a combination of moxibustion
P = 0.13; 1 trial). and acupuncture was better than acupuncture alone for in-
creasing the number of cured patients (RR: 1.47; 95% CI:
Therapeutic effect of acupoint catgut embed- 1.05–2.07; P = 0.03; fixed model; I2 = 0%; 2 trials).
ding. Three trials36,43,52 evaluated the therapeutic effect of
acupoint catgut embedding for acne. One study52 showed Adverse events. Twenty-nine trials did not mention ad-
acupoint catgut embedding was superior to pharmaceutical verse events. Of the fourteen trials10,11,13,19,27,30,31,36,42,43,45,47,50,52
medication in increasing the number of cured patients (RR: that did report adverse events, seven trials11,27,30,31,42,45,50
1.57; 95% CI: 1.15–2.15; P = 0.004; 1 trial) and in reducing found no adverse events in both intervention and control
recurrence rate (RR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08–0.62; P = 0.004; 1 groups. The remaining seven trials reported mild adverse
trial). One trial36 showed acupoint catgut embedding com- events in the intervention and control groups (Table 1), such
bined with herbal medicine was superior to herbal medicine as thirst, dizziness, redness and swelling of the treated site,
ACUPOINT STIMULATION FOR ACNE 191
Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medi- 42. Xie GX, Ding H. Clinical Observations on Quality of Life
cine; 2009. After Treatment of Acne with Acupuncture and Injection [in
27. Li Q, Sun YC. Acne Chinese medicine complex therapy ef- Chinese; Master’s thesis]. Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou
fect observation analysis [in Chinese]. Chinese Manipulation University of Chinese Medicine; 2011.
Rehabil Med. 2011;38(1):175–177. 43. Xie J, Wang WZ. Acupoint Catgut Embedding Combined with
28. Li Y, He L, Liu BH, Zhang HR, Zhang P, Ai MM. Fire needle Minocycline in the Treatment of Acne due to Damp-Heat
therapy combined with Yanghe decoction in the treatment of Syndrome [in Chinese; Master’s thesis]. Hubei, China: Hubei
acne of yang deficiency type [in Chinese]. J Clin Acupunct University of Chinese Medicine; 2008.
Moxibustion. 2011;27(4):11–13. 44. Xu JP, Liu CZ. Observations on the therapeutic effect of oral
29. Liu HL, Wang LX. Observation on therapeutic effect of Chinese medicine combined with acupuncture in the treat-
acupoint autologous blood injection as an adjuvant treatment ment of 62 cases of acne vulgaris [in Chinese]. Chinese J
for acne vulgaris [in Chinese]. J Changzhi Med Coll. 2008; Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(1):55–56.
22(6):452–453. 45. Xu RJ, Fu WB. Clinical Observations on Combination of
30. Liu HP, Liang B, He JB, Zhang CQ. Therapeutic effect of Acupuncture with Herbs in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris of
acupuncture combined with flash cupping for acne vulgaris Lung Wind-Heat Type [in Chinese; Master’s thesis].
[in Chinese]. Liaoning J Traditional Chinese Med. 2009; Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou University of Chinese Medi-
36(8):1395–1397. cine; 2010.
31. Lu LH, Zhu MH. Clinical Observations on Treating Acne 46. Yan DY, Fan RQ. Clinical Observations on Quality of Life
(Chinese Medicine Type): Lung Wind Heat by Bloodletting After Treatment of Acne with Traditional Chinese Herbs
and Cupping with Herbal Medicine on Dazhui Acupoint [in Combined with Facial Acupuncture [in Chinese; Master’s
Chinese; Master’s thesis]. Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou thesis]. Guangzhou, China: Guangzhou University of Tradi-
University of Chinese Medicine; 2011. tional Chinese Medicine; 2006.
32. Mao L, Zhang MB. Clinical observations on acupuncture for 47. Yang L. Compound betamethasone acupoint injection and
the treatment of acne [in Chinese]. J Liaoning University vitamin A acid combination therapy in 31 cases of severe
Traditional Chinese Med. 2008;10(7):120–121. acne [in Chinese]. Nei Mongol J Traditional Chinese Med.
33. Mi JP, Yu ZS. Clinical observations on therapeutic effect of 2008;27(11):95–96.
acupuncture of abdominal acupoints in the treatment of cystic 48. Yang QJ. Observations on acupoint autologous blood injec-
acne [in Chinese]. 2011 Annual Symposium of China Asso- tion in 36 cases of acne [in Chinese]. China’s Naturopathy.
ciation of Acupuncture–Moxibustion, Beijing, China, August 2008;16(7):11.
19–22, 2011. 49. Zhang F. Clinical observations on traditional Chinese medi-
34. Song XW. Clinical observations on acupoint pricking therapy cine accompanied by hydro-acupuncture therapy in 56 cases
for treatment of acne [in Chinese]. Med JChinese People’s of acne [in Chinese]. Liaoning J Traditional Chinese Med.
Health. 2011;23(16):2008–2009. 2007;34(10):1423–1424.
35. Wang D, Fu YJ. Clinical Observations on Therapeutic Effect 50. Zhang KX, Song SJ. Clinical observations on pricking with
of Acupuncture and Guasha in the Treatment of Damp–Heat tri-ensiform needle and bloodletting cupping on back-shu
Type Acne [in Chinese; Master’s thesis]. Guangzhou, China: points in the treatment of acne vulgaris [in Chinese]. World
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine; 2011. Health Dig. 2008;5(5):193–194.
36. Wang L, Feng ZH, Liu L. Acupoint catgut embedding com- 51. Zhang L. Acupuncture and moxibustion treatment of 160
bined with oral Chinese medicine in the treatment of 68 cases cases of acne [in Chinese]. Beijing J Traditional Chinese
of acne [in Chinese]. Chinese J Dermatol Venereol Integr Med. 2006;25(8):497–498.
Traditional Western Med. 2009;8(3):168–169. 52. Zhang XP, Ran YY, Ma K. Treatment of acupoint catgut
37. Wang QF, Wang GY. Observations on the efficacy of acu- embedding with pharmaceutical medicine on 112 cases of
puncture and moxibustion plus bloodletting acupuncture and acne [in Chinese]. Henan J Traditional Chinese Med. 2010;
movable cupping in the treatment of acne [in Chinese]. 30(5):504–505.
Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibustion. 2007;26(12):20–21. 53. Zheng XY. Dermatology disease. In: Guiding Principle of
38. Wu FF, Yang SQ, Zhang SJ. Bloodletting acupuncture Clinical Research on New Drugs of Traditional Chinese
and cupping on Back-Shu acupoints in the treatment of ado- Medicine [in Chinese]. Beijing: China Medical Science Press;
lescent acne [in Chinese]. J Qiqihar Medical Coll. 2010; 2002:290–295.
31(10):1586. 54. State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. ZY/
39. Wu HX, Wang ZL. Clinical observations on therapeutic effect T001.8-94. Dermatology disease. In: Criteria of Diagnosis
of 68 cases of acne treated with hydroacupuncture [in Chinese]. and Therapeutic Effect of Traditional Chinese Medicine [in
J Zhejiang Coll Traditional Chinese Med. 1998;22(4):40–41. Chinese]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press; 1994:158.
40. Wu YT. Therapeutic effect of bloodletting cupping therapy on 55. Zhao B. Disease of skin appendages. In: Clinical Dermatol-
the back in the treatment of acne [in Chinese]. J Practical ogy [in Chinese]. Jiangsu: Jiangsu Science and Technology
Traditional Chinese Internal Med. 2008;22(10):61–32. Press; 2003:833–835.
41. Xie CC, Zhong JN, Yang ZX. Clinical observations on ther- 56. Wang XS, Liao KH. Monograph No. 44: Disease of seba-
apeutic effect of acupuncture and medicinal facial mask in the ceous glands and sweat glands. Yang Guoliang’s Dermatology
treatment of acne [in Chinese]. Southern China J Dermato- [in Chinese]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology
Venereol. 2009;16(3):193–195. Literature Press; 2005:725–726.
194 CAO ET AL.
57. Fehnel SE, Mcleod LD, Brandman J, et al. Responsiveness of Address correspondence to:
the acne-specific quality of life questionnaire (Acne-QoL) to Jian-ping Liu, PhD
treatment for acne vulgaris in placebo-controlled clinical tri- Centre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine
als. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(8):809–816. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
58. Adityan B, Kumari R, Thappa DM. Scoring systems in acne 88# Mail Box
vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(3):
Bei San Huan Dong Lu 11
323–326.
Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029
59. The CONSORT Group. CONSORT Statement 2001—
Checklist: Items to Include When Reporting a Randomized China
Trial. Online document at: www.consort-statement.org. Ac-
cessed: March 3, 2012. E-mail: jianping_l@hotmail.com