Transverse Myelitis: Clinical Practice
Transverse Myelitis: Clinical Practice
Transverse Myelitis: Clinical Practice
clinical practice
Transverse Myelitis
Elliot M. Frohman, M.D., Ph.D., and Dean M. Wingerchuk, M.D.
This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem.
Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented, followed by a review of formal guidelines,
when they exist. The article ends with the author’s clinical recommendations.
From the Departments of Neurology and The term “transverse myelitis” describes a heterogeneous group of inflammatory
Ophthalmology, University of Texas South disorders that are characterized by acute or subacute motor, sensory, and auto-
western Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas
(E.M.F.); and the Department of Neurol nomic (bladder, bowel, and sexual) spinal cord dysfunction (Table 1).1 The clinical
ogy, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ (D.M.W.). signs are caused by an interruption in ascending and descending neuroanatomical
Address reprint requests to Dr. Frohman pathways in the transverse plane of the spinal cord, and a resulting sensory level is
at the Department of Neurology, Uni
versity of Texas Southwestern Medical characteristic of the syndrome. The transverse myelitis syndrome may arise from
Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., various causes, but it most often occurs as an autoimmune phenomenon after an
Dallas, TX 75235, or at elliot.frohman@ infection or vaccination (accounting for 60% of the cases in children) or as a result
utsouthwestern.edu.
of a direct infection, an underlying systemic autoimmune disease, or an acquired
N Engl J Med 2010;363:564-72. demyelinating disease such as multiple sclerosis or the spectrum of disorders re-
Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society. lated to neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s disease, a demyelinating disease that is de-
fined by transverse myelitis and optic neuritis).2-7 However, after detailed evalua-
tion, 15 to 30% of the cases of transverse myelitis are ultimately categorized as
idiopathic.5,8
Estimates of the annual incidence of idiopathic or postinfectious transverse
myelitis range from 1.3 to 8 cases per million. Although the disorder can develop
An audio version
at any age, there is a bimodal peak in the incidence at 10 to 19 years of age and
of this article
is available at at 30 to 39 years.9,10 The incidence increases to 24.6 cases per million annually if
NEJM.org acquired demyelinating causes, especially multiple sclerosis, are included.11 There
is no clear pattern among cases of idiopathic transverse myelitis with respect to
sex, geographic distribution, or familial susceptibility.
The pathological hallmark of transverse myelitis is the presence of focal collec-
tions of lymphocytes and monocytes, with varying degrees of demyelination, axonal
injury, and astroglial and microglial activation, within the spinal cord.2 Neuro-
myelitis optica lesions contain deposits of immunoglobulin and complement
around small blood vessels, and necrosis can be observed in severe cases.7 The
observation that systemic infection or immunization precedes many cases of trans-
Compressive lesion?
No Yes
No Yes
No Yes
Consider noninflammatory
Determine cause of myelitis
myelopathies
Consider repeat MRI
in 2–7 days
Test for infection
Test for systemic inflam-
matory or autoimmune
disease
Test for cancer
Negative Positive
High risk for MS Low risk for MS Reconsider history Neuromyelitis optica
spectrum disorder
No Yes No Yes
A B C
D E F
lution of the inflammatory spinal cord lesion, or route of administration is lacking. Oral regi-
thereby speeding clinical recovery. Corticosteroids mens may be used in the case of patients with
are the standard first-line treatment; however, relatively mild episodes of myelitis who do not
because there have been no randomized, con- require hospitalization (e.g., in cases associated
trolled trials of corticosteroid therapy of patients with established multiple sclerosis).25,26 Potential
with transverse myelitis, supporting evidence for adverse effects of pulsed corticosteroid therapy
the use of corticosteroids as first-line therapy is include gastrointestinal symptoms, insomnia,
derived from case studies or extrapolation from headache, anxiety, mania, hypertension, hyper-
trials involving patients with multiple sclero- glycemia, and electrolyte disturbances.
sis.1-5,7,17,24,25 Approximately 50 to 70% of pa- Rescue therapy with plasma exchange may
tients have partial or complete recovery and are benefit patients who do not have a response to
ambulatory with or without aid.8,24 High-dose corticosteroids.27-29 In a randomized, crossover
intravenous regimens are typically used (e.g., trial involving 22 patients with idiopathic in-
1000 mg of methylprednisolone daily, generally flammatory demyelinating syndromes (7 of which
for 3 to 5 days),25 although evidence of the supe- were cases of myelitis) that did not respond to
riority of a particular corticosteroid drug, dose, corticosteroids, 42% of the patients had moder-
Table 2. Concise Differential Diagnosis and Diagnostic Testing for Transverse Myelitis.*
Infection Blood serologic studies; CSF culture, serologic studies, and PCR; chest radiography
and other imaging as indicated
Systemic autoimmune or inflammatory disease Clinical examination; serologic studies; chest and joint radiography; other tests or
imaging as indicated by history and examination
Paraneoplastic cause Chest radiography, computed tomography, or positron-emission tomography;
comprehensive serum and CSF paraneoplastic antibody panel
Acquired CNS demyelinating disease (multiple Brain MRI with gadolinium enhancement; CSF examination for cell count and differ
sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica) ential count, oligoclonal bands, and IgG index; tests of visual evoked potentials;
serum NMO-IgG testing
Postinfectious or postvaccination cause History taking that reveals clear, recent history of infection or vaccination; serologic
confirmation of recent infection; exclusion of other causes
* CNS denotes central nervous system, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, NMO neuromyelitis optica, and PCR polymerase chain reaction.
ate to marked improvement during plasma ex- confirm the specific efficacy of therapeutic or
change, as compared with only 5.9% of patients prophylactic interventions in patients with trans-
undergoing a sham procedure.27 Hypotension, verse myelitis; therefore, recommendations are
electrolyte imbalance, coagulopathy, thrombocy- based on observational studies or clinical experi-
topenia, catheter-related thrombosis, and infec- ence with patients who have multiple sclerosis or
tion are recognized complications of plasma other neurologic diseases. Most patients with
exchange. new-onset myelitis are hospitalized for observa-
In an uncontrolled, retrospective study involv- tion and management of their condition.
ing 122 patients with transverse myelitis from
various causes, 56 patients with severe impair- Respiratory and Oropharyngeal Support
ment that did not respond to corticosteroid ther- Transverse myelitis can cause respiratory failure
apy were further treated with plasma exchange, by involving the upper cervical spinal cord and
cyclophosphamide, or both. Plasmapheresis was brain stem7; therefore, regular reassessment of
associated with an improvement among patients respiratory and oropharyngeal functions are re-
who had some remaining sensorimotor function quired during the evolution of myelitis. Dyspnea,
at the nadir of the attack, but patients who had the use of accessory muscles, or a weak cough
complete loss of sensorimotor function gener- requires further evaluation with the use of tests
ally appeared to have improvement only when of respiratory forces and pulmonary function. In-
they were treated with both cyclophosphamide tubation for mechanical ventilation is required
and plasmapheresis. Adjunctive short-term im- for some patients. Dysarthria, dysphagia, or re-
munosuppressive strategies deserve further inves- duced tongue function or gag reflex warrants a
tigation. formal investigation of the patient’s swallowing
Among patients with underlying demyelinat- function to assess the need for the temporary
ing disease, long-term immunomodulatory or placement of a feeding tube, through which ad-
immunosuppressive therapies have been shown equate nutrition can be provided while the risk of
to reduce the risk of future attacks.30,31 A discus- aspiration pneumonia is minimized.
sion of these therapies is beyond the scope of
this article. Motor Weakness and Complications of Immobilization
Administration of low-molecular-weight heparin
Treatment of Symptoms and Complications for prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis is
There are several important stabilizing and pre- warranted for all patients with immobility.32 Non-
ventive measures that can be taken to reduce the ambulatory patients benefit from frequent ad-
symptoms and complications of transverse my- justments of their position while they are sitting
elitis (Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix). or in bed to promote comfort and maintain skin
No data from randomized trials are available to integrity. Collaboration with a physical medicine
team should be considered so that multidisci- placebo and amantadine for the treatment of fa-
plinary neurorehabilitation can be initiated early.33 tigue associated with multiple sclerosis,44 but larg-
Ambulation can be aided with the use of appro- er, controlled trials are required to corroborate this
priate devices. An oral sustained-release potassi- finding. Stimulants such as dextroamphetamine or
um-channel blocker, 4-aminopyridine, has been methylphenidate are occasionally used to treat se-
shown to improve walking speed in patients with vere, refractory fatigue that occurs after an epi-
multiple sclerosis, possibly by prolonging the du- sode of myelitis, but the usefulness of these agents
ration of the action potential, although this agent in treating patients with myelitis has not been
has not been studied specifically in patients with tested in randomized, controlled trials.
transverse myelitis.34
Genitourinary and Bowel Dysfunction
Abnormalities of Tone The placement of a urethral catheter is usually
Severe myelitis may be associated with hypotonia necessary during the acute phase of transverse
in the acute phase (during spinal shock), but this is myelitis, owing to retention of urine in the blad-
typically followed by the emergence of increased der. After the acute phase, detrusor hyperreflexia
resistance to movement (tonic spasticity), along typically develops and is characterized by urinary
with involuntary muscle spasms (phasic spastic- frequency, urgency, urge incontinence, and the
ity). Spasticity is an adaptive response that can perception of bladder spasms.45 These symptoms
facilitate ambulation, but when it is excessive, are usually reduced with the administration of
painful, or intrusive, it may require treatment anticholinergic agents (e.g., oxybutynin and tolt-
with physical therapy and medications. Data from erodine).30,46 Less frequently, there is inadequate
controlled trials support the benefits of baclofen, relaxation of bladder sphincters during detrusor
tizanidine, and benzodiazepines for the treat- contraction (detrusor–sphincter dyssynergia), re-
ment of patients with spasticity associated with sulting in retention of urine, with an increased
disorders of the brain and spinal cord.35 risk of vesicoureteral reflux, infection, and cal-
culus formation. Urinary symptoms are unreli-
Pain able in differentiating poor bladder compliance
Pain is common during and after an attack of (failure to store urine) from bladder retention.
myelitis and can be caused by direct neural injury Ultrasonographic assessment of residual urine
(neuropathic pain), orthopedic factors (e.g., pain volume in the bladder after voiding is useful to
due to postural derangements or bursitis), spas- rule out urinary retention, but urodynamic studies
ticity, or some combination of these factors. may be required to fully characterize the urinary
Neuropathic pain may respond to treatment with dysfunction.45 Drugs that inhibit α1-adrenergic re-
anticonvulsant agents, antidepressant medica- ceptors can promote urinary sphincter relaxation
tions (tricyclic antidepressants and reuptake in- and bladder emptying in patients with excess
hibitors of serotonin and norepinephrine), non- sphincter activity, but some patients require in-
steroidal analgesics, and narcotics.30,36-40 termittent catheterization to adequately empty
their bladder.47
Fatigue In the acute and chronic phases of transverse
Reduced mobility, medications, pain, and other fac- myelitis, bowel dysfunction is characterized by
tors can contribute to excessive fatigue after an epi- constipation and the risk of impaction, difficulty
sode of myelitis; systematic evaluation and man- with bowel evacuation from the rectal vault, and
agement of the causes of the fatigue are warranted in some cases incontinence, which is usually as-
(Table 2 in the Supplementary Appendix). Phar- sociated with an inadequate bowel program to
macotherapy is reserved for cases in which these reduce constipation and control the timing of
causes have been ruled out or treated.41 Data from defecation.30
randomized, controlled trials have shown the effi- Sexual dysfunction is a frequent consequence
cacy of amantadine for the treatment of fatigue as- of transverse myelitis and may be manifested as
sociated with multiple sclerosis, and in one study 42 reduced genital sensation, pain, reduced ability
— but not another 43 — modafinil was shown to be to achieve arousal, or anorgasmia.48 Therapeutic
beneficial. A randomized, blinded, crossover, pilot options are outlined in Table 2 in the Supple-
study showed that acetyl L-carnitine was superior to mentary Appendix.
Psychiatric Considerations ratory tests, and an MRI study of the brain, to-
Mood and anxiety disorders are among the most gether with an assessment of the characteristics
common long-term consequences of transverse of the spinal cord lesion, allow for a rapid assess-
myelitis and influence other symptoms, such as ment of the likelihood that the episode of trans-
pain and sexual function. Pharmacotherapy is verse myelitis is associated with an infection, an
commonly prescribed, either alone or in conjunc- underlying systemic disease, or a demyelinating
tion with psychological counseling. disease such as multiple sclerosis. Admission to
the hospital is warranted for observation of the
A r e a s of Uncer ta in t y evolution of the syndrome and for treatment of
the patient. Data from randomized trials to in-
Identifying the cause of transverse myelitis is of- form the treatment specifically for patients with
ten challenging, and in many circumstances the transverse myelitis are lacking; however, on the
cause remains unknown. The yield of several tests basis of clinical experience and trials involving
appears to be low, and there is no consensus re- patients with other demyelinating diseases, high-
garding the optimal evaluation in terms of cost- dose corticosteroids are considered to be the
effectiveness. Data from randomized trials to guide first-line therapy. Assessments by physical and
decisions regarding initial therapy, indications for occupational therapists and treatment of symp-
intensification of treatment, and the optimal toms such as pain and urinary dysfunction are
management of associated symptoms are scarce. indicated. Counseling about the natural history
of transverse myelitis and the prognosis must be
Guidel ine s given on an individual basis, depending on the
cause of the condition (if it is identified), and
Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of transverse patients and families should be offered support
myelitis have been developed.1 However, to our in managing this debilitating condition.
knowledge, there are no professional guidelines Dr. Frohman reports receiving speaking fees from Biogen
for the management of transverse myelitis. Idec, Teva Neuroscience, Bayer, and Novartis and consulting fees
from Biogen Idec, Teva Neuroscience, Abbott, and Genzyme;
and Dr. Wingerchuk, receiving research support from Alexion,
C onclusions a nd Genzyme, Genentech, Organon (now part of Merck), and the
R ec om mendat ions National Multiple Sclerosis Society and consulting fees from
Novartis, Teva Neuroscience, VLST, and the Guthy–Jackson
Charitable Foundation. No other potential conflict of interest
The patient described in the vignette presented relevant to this article was reported.
with classic clinical and neuroimaging manifes- Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with
tations of acute transverse myelitis. Information the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
We thank Marvin Ruona, Mayo Clinic Media Support Ser-
obtained from the clinical history, an analysis of vices, for assistance with Figure 1 in the Supplementary Ap-
the cerebrospinal fluid, the results of other labo- pendix.
References
1. Transverse Myelitis Consortium Work- SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Re- 11. Debette S, de Sèze J, Pruvo JP, et al.
ing Group. Proposed diagnostic criteria vised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis Long-term outcome of acute and subacute
and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. optica. Neurology 2006;66:1485-9. myelopathies. J Neurol 2009;256:980-8.
Neurology 2002;59:499-505. 7. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchi- 12. Pidcock FS, Krishnan C, Crawford
2. Kaplin AI, Krishnan C, Deshpande netti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The TO, Salorio CF, Trovato M, Kerr DA. Acute
DM, Pardo CA, Kerr DA. Diagnosis and spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet transverse myelitis in childhood: center-
management of acute myelopathies. Neu- Neurol 2007;6:805-15. based analysis of 47 cases. Neurology
rologist 2005;11:2-18. 8. de Seze J, Lanctin C, Lebrun C, et al. 2007;68:1474-80.
3. Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An approach Idiopathic acute transverse myelitis: appli- 13. Kumar N, Frohman EM. Spinal neuro-
to the diagnosis of acute transverse myeli- cation of the recent diagnostic criteria. sarcoidosis mimicking an idiopathic in-
tis. Semin Neurol 2008;28:105-20. Neurology 2005;65:1950-3. flammatory demyelinating syndrome.
4. Wingerchuk DM. Postinfectious en- 9. Berman M, Feldman S, Alter M, Zilber Arch Neurol 2004;61:586-9.
cephalomyelitis. Curr Neurol Neurosci N, Kahana E. Acute transverse myelitis: 14. Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF. Inflamma-
Rep 2003;3:256-64. incidence and etiologic considerations. tory transverse myelitis: evolving con-
5. de Seze J, Stojkovic T, Breteau G, et al. Neurology 1981;31:966-71. cepts. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:362-8.
Acute myelopathies: clinical, laboratory 10. Bhat A, Naguwa S, Cheema G, Gersh- 15. Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, de Seze J, et al.
and outcome profiles in 79 cases. Brain win ME. The epidemiology of transverse Neuromyelitis optica and non organ-spe-
2001;124:1509-21. myelitis. Autoimmun Rev 2010;9:A395- cific autoimmunity. Arch Neurol 2008;65:
6. Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock A399. 78-83.
16. Scott TF. Nosology of idiopathic trans- tem inflammatory demyelinating disease. for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database
verse myelitis syndromes. Acta Neurol Ann Neurol 1999;46:878-86. Syst Rev 2005;3:CD005454.
Scand 2007;115:371-6. 28. Watanabe S, Nakashima I, Misu T, et al. 40. Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ, Moore RA.
17. Compston A, Coles A. Multiple sclero- Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange Carbamazepine for acute and chronic
sis. Lancet 2008;372:1502-17. in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuro- pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:
18. Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, myelitis optica. Mult Scler 2007;13:128-32. CD005451.
O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical 29. Bonnan M, Valentino R, Olindo S, 41. Brañas P, Jordan R, Fry-Smith A, Burls
course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s Mehdaoui H, Smadja D, Cabre P. Plasma A, Hyde C. Treatments for fatigue in mul-
syndrome). Neurology 1999;53:1107-14. exchange in severe spinal attacks associ- tiple sclerosis: a rapid and systematic re-
19. Misu T, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Sato ated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum view. Health Technol Assess 2000;4:1-61.
S, Itoyama Y. Intractable hiccup and nau- disorder. Mult Scler 2009;15:487-92. 42. Rammohan KW, Rosenberg JH, Lynn
sea with periaqueductal lesions in neuro- 30. Courtney AM, Treadaway K, Reming- DJ, Blumenfeld AM, Pollak CP, Nagaraja
myelitis optica. Neurology 2005;65:1479- ton G, Frohman EM. Multiple sclerosis. HN. Efficacy and safety of modafinil
82. Med Clin North Am 2009;93:451-76. (Provigil) for the treatment of fatigue in
20. Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer 31. Wingerchuk DM, Weinshenker BG. multiple sclerosis: a two centre phase 2
TJ, et al. A serum autoantibody marker of Neuromyelitis optica. Curr Treat Options study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;
neuromyelitis optica: distinction from mul- Neurol 2008;10:55-66. 72:179-83.
tiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004;364:2106-12. 32. Spivack SB, Aisen ML. A comparison 43. Stankoff B, Waubant E, Confavreux C,
21. Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, of low molecular weight heparin and low et al. Modafinil for fatigue in MS: a ran-
Verkman AS, Hinson SR. IgG marker of dose unfractionated heparin prophylaxis domized placebo-controlled double-blind
optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to in subacute myelopathy. J Spinal Cord Med study. Neurology 2005;64:1139-43.
the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 1997;20:402-5. 44. Tomassini V, Pozzilli C, Onesti E, et al.
2005;202:473-7. 33. Kesselring J, Beer S. Symptomatic Comparison of the effects of acetyl L-car-
22. Weinshenker BG, Wingerchuk DM, therapy and neurorehabilitation in multi- nitine and amantadine for the treatment
Vukusic S, et al. Neuromyelitis optica IgG ple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2005;4:643- of fatigue in multiple sclerosis: results of
predicts relapse after longitudinally ex- 52. a pilot, randomised, double-blind, cross-
tensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 34. Goodman AD, Brown TR, Krupp LB, over trial. J Neurol Sci 2004;218:103-8.
2006;59:566-9. et al. Sustained-release oral fampridine in 45. Lemack GE, Frohman EM, Zimmern
23. Hummers LK, Krishnan C, Casciola- multiple sclerosis: a randomised, double- PE, Hawker K, Ramnarayan P. Urodynam-
Rosen L, et al. Recurrent transverse myeli- blind, controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373: ic distinctions between idiopathic detru-
tis associates with anti-Ro (SSA) autoanti- 732-8. sor overactivity and detrusor overactivity
bodies. Neurology 2004;62:147-9. 35. Groves L, Shellenberger MK, Davis CS. secondary to multiple sclerosis. Urology
24. Greenberg BM, Thomas KP, Krishnan Tizanidine treatment of spasticity: a meta- 2006;67:960-4.
C, Kaplin AI, Calabresi PA, Kerr DA. Idio- analysis of controlled, double-blind, com- 46. Abrams P, Freeman R, Anderström C,
pathic transverse myelitis: corticosteroids, parative studies with baclofen and diaze- Mattiasson A. Tolterodine, a new anti-
plasma exchange, or cyclophosphamide. pam. Adv Ther 1998;15:241-51. muscarinic agent: as effective but better
Neurology 2007;68:1614-7. 36. Namaka M, Leong C, Grossberndt A, tolerated than oxybutinin in patients with
25. Frohman EM, Shah A, Eggenberger E, et al. A treatment algorithm for neuro- an overactive bladder. Br J Urol 1998;81:
Metz L, Zivadinov R, Stüve O. Corticoste pathic pain: an update. Consult Pharm 801-10.
roids for multiple sclerosis: I. Application 2009;24:885-902. 47. Bennett JK, Foote J, El-Leithy TR, et al.
for treating MS exacerbations. Neurothera- 37. Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants Terazosin for vesicosphincter dyssynergia
peutics 2007;4:618-26. for neuropathic pain. Cochrane Database in spinal cord-injured male patients. Mol
26. Martinelli V, Rocca MA, Annovazzi P, Syst Rev 2007;4:CD005454. Urol 2000;4:415-20.
et al. A short-term randomized MRI study 38. Tzellos TG, Papazisis G, Amaniti E, 48. Fletcher SG, Castro-Borrero W, Rem-
of high-dose oral vs intravenous methyl- Kouvelas D. Efficacy of pregabalin and ington G, Treadaway K, Lemack GE, Froh
prednisolone in MS. Neurology 2009;73: gabapentin for neuropathic pain in spinal- man EM. Sexual dysfunction in patients
1842-8. cord injury: an evidence-based evaluation with multiple sclerosis: a multidisciplinary
27. Weinshenker BG, O’Brien PC, Petter- of the literature. Eur J Clin Pharmacol approach to evaluation and management.
son TM, et al. A randomized trial of plas- 2008;64:851-8. Nat Clin Pract Urol 2009;6:96-107.
ma exchange in acute central nervous sys- 39. Saarto T, Wiffen PJ. Antidepressants Copyright © 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society.