Quality of Life in Patients Suffering From Insomnia
Quality of Life in Patients Suffering From Insomnia
Quality of Life in Patients Suffering From Insomnia
261 insomnia
Zammit et al
SF-36 subjects, 101 Insomnia patients had significantly lower SF-36 scores compared to controls (p< 0.0001).
(1999)11
controls
In a population of older adults, 26% reported 1 insomnia symptom, 13% reported 2, and
Schubert et
SF-36 2,800 10% reported 3. SF-36 decreased on all 8 domains as the number of reported symptoms
al (2002)12
increased (p< 0.0001).
Chronic physical illness was associated with poorer HRQOL (p<0.0001). Psychotropic
Stein et al
SF-36 1,359 medications use was associated with lower scores on SF-36 MCS (p=0.0001) and SF-36
(2008)13
PCS (p=0.015) in women (controlling for age and number of comorbid illnesses).
This study compared good sleepers (GS) to patients with severe insomnia (SI)—Physician
240 insomnia visit with insomnia complaint: 0% GS v. 18% SI (p<0.0001); regularly taking sleeping pills:
Léger et al
SF-36 subjects and 391 0% GS v. 28% SI (p<0.0001); hospitalizations (past 12 mo.): 9% GS v. 18% SI
(2001)17
good sleepers (p=0.0017); on at least 1 medication: 44% GS v. 67% SI (OR=2.59); “Work error that could
have serious consequences:” 6% GS v. 15% SI (p<0.001).
34% had mild insomnia and 16% had severe insomnia at baseline. 59% (95% CI, 55%-
Katz and 63%) of patients’ with mild insomnia and 83% (95% CI, 78–88%) with severe insomnia at
McHorney SF-36 3,445 baseline still had problems at 2-year follow-up. Mild and severe insomnia were associated
(2002)29 with decreases in physical health perception (mild: OR=2.0; severe: OR=5.1), vitality (mild:
OR=2.4; severe: OR=7.4), and mental health (mild: OR=3.5; severe: OR=10.2) domains.
Sleep problems were found to be associated with physical (AOR=1.21, 95% CI=1.01–1.45)
and mental health problems (AOR=3.58, 95% CI=2.95–4.35) especially in those with
Stein et al comorbid physical health issues. The co-occurrence of insomnia was independently
SF-36 4,181
(2002)31 associated with poorer ratings on the SF-36 PCS (p< 0.001) and increased the odds of 1 or
more days taken off from work in the past 30 days due to physical problems (AOR=1.55,
95% CI=1.20–1.98) by 50%.
Insomnia with reported impairments in daytime functioning was associated with significant
QOL deficits across all domains (p<0.001). Compared to patients without insomnia,
Hatoum et al
SF-36 1,100 patients with problems with quality/quantity of sleep (no reported daytime symptoms)
(1998)32
demonstrated significantly lower scores on the PCS (p<0.001) and the body pain (p=0.01)
subscale.
Guereje et al 2,152 elderly Difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep and early AM awakening were associated with
WHOQOL-Bref
(2009)34 Nigerians physical, psychological, social, and environmental subscales and overall QOL (p<0.05).
Sleep disturbance and daytime fatigue were associated with increased likelihood of low
Lee et al scores on the following subscales: physical functioning, AOR=6.10; physical health
SF-36 397
(2009)35 problems, AOR=8.28; bodily pain, AOR=6.41; general health, AOR=5.88; vitality,
AOR=17.09; social functioning, AOR=5.46; and mental health, AOR=12.83.
QOL: quality of life; SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; HRQOL: health-related quality of life; MCS: mental component score;
PCS: physical component score; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AOR: adjusted odds ratio; WHOQOL-Bref: World Health Organization
Quality of Life—Brief Form
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
REFERENCE MEASURE USED N INTERVENTION DURATION
(P VALUES, ODDS RATIOS, PERCENTAGES, OR EFFECT SIZES)
ESZ 2mg group had greater QOL (p<0.05), daytime alertness, and
231 adults aged ESZ 1mg (n=72),
Scharf et al sense of well-being as compared to placebo on the following
Q-LES-Q 65–85 years with ESZ 2mg (n=79), or 2 weeks
(2005)70 domains: physical health, mood, household activities, and leisure
primary insomnia placebo (n=80)
time activities.
SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy; BASIS-32: Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale; DLRF: daily living and role functioning;
RSO: relation to self and others; Q-LES-Q: Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form; FLX: fluoxetine; ESZ: eszopiclone; QOL: quality of life; MCS: mental
component score; PCS: physical component score; OR: odds ratio
to those receiving placebo. They also addition to the Q-LES-Q to assess within the same treatment group.
demonstrated decreased sleep onset QOL in a population of individuals Both subscales of the BASIS-32 had
latency, increased time to waking, with comorbid unipolar depression moderate effect sizes (DLRF: 0.62;
and total sleep time.69 Scharf et al70 and insomnia at baseline and RSO: 0.44) and the Q-LES-Q had a
corroborated these findings in an following treatment with a small effect size (0.38).
elderly population randomized to combination of fluoxetine and Melatonin and melatonin
placebo or eszopiclone. In this eszopiclone or placebo. Following receptor agonists. Melatonin is a
subset of the population, the above eight weeks of treatment with either hormone produced in humans by the
sleep parameters as well as QOL fluoxetine plus eszopiclone or pineal gland in the central part of
showed improvement in the fluoxetine plus placebo, the the cerebrum. Melatonin agonists
eszopiclone group on the following eszopiclone group demonstrated are safe, nonaddictive, sleep-
domains: household activities, significantly greater improvement in inducing drugs that eliminate
leisure activities, mood, medication, QOL as compared to the placebo changes in the circadian rhythm.
and physical health, as measured by group. Additionally, women They can regulate sleep-wake cycles
the Q-LES-Q.70 demonstrated significantly greater and re-adjust circadian rhythms.71 In
McCall et al22 used the DLRF and improvement in QOL at the end of a review evaluating the safety of
RSO subscales of the BASIS-32 in treatment compared to the men different pharmacotherapeutic
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
REFERENCE MEASURE USED N INTERVENTION DURATION
(P VALUES, ODDS RATIOS, PERCENTAGES, OR EFFECT SIZES)
Self-administered
23-item
Insomnia patients
questionnaire
taking zoplicone for
developed by study
12 months or more
Leger et al sleep experts (5 167 with insomnia, No differences found in quality of life between subjects with
vs. good sleeper Cross-sectional
(1995)81 aspects of QOL- 381 good sleepers insomnia and good sleepers.
with no hypnotic use
Safety, Professional,
in the past 12
Leisure, Domestic,
months
Relational, and
Sentimental)
Zolpidem 10mg po 5
nights/week and
Both groups demonstrated improvement with treatment. The
Hajak et al 789 with insomnia, placebo 2
SF-36 14 days continuous group demonstrated a greater increase in mean MOS
(2002)82 aged 18–60 years nights/week vs.
score as compared to the discontinuous group (p=0.005).
Zolpidem 10mg po
continuously
Individual CBT v.
group CBT. CBT
Individual treatment: included
18 chronic primary psychoeducation, 6 consecutive weekly
Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in QOL on the
Verbeek et al insomnia. Group sleep hygiene, sessions and follow-
SF-36 SIP SIP: pre- to post-treatment (p=0.000) and from pre-treatment to
(2006)83 treatment: 40 stimulus control, up sessions 1, 3,
follow-up (p=0.025).
primary or sleep restriction, and 6 months
secondary insomnia. relaxation exercises,
and cognitive
restructuring.
SF-36: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36; CBT: cognitive behavioral therapy; CIS-20: Checklist Individual Strength; GHQ: General Health Questionnaire; PANAS: Positive Affect
Negative Affect Schedule; ES: effect size; BASIS-32: Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale; DLRF: daily living and role functioning; RSO: relation to self and others; Q-LES-Q:
Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form; FLX: fluoxetine; ESZ: eszopiclone; QOL: quality of life; MCS: mental component score; PCS: physical component
score; OR: odds ratio; HRQOL: health-related quality of life; FACT-G: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy; MOS: Medical Outcomes Study sleep module; SIP: Sickness Impact
Profile