See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/323782984

FUNGAL CELLULASE; PRODUCTION AND APPLICATIONS: MINIREVIEW

Article · March 2018

DOI: 10.20319/lijhls.2018.41.1936

CITATION READS
1 953

2 authors, including:

Amer Ahmed
Università degli Studi di Siena
5 PUBLICATIONS   15 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Structural Biology View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Amer Ahmed on 27 November 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Ahmed & Bibi., 2018

Volume 4 Issue 1, pp. 19 - 36
Date of Publication: 15th March, 2018
DOI-https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.41.1936
This Paper Can Be Cited As: Ahmed, A., & Bibi, A. (2018). Fungal Cellulase; Production and
Applications: Minireview. LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life Sciences, 4(1), 19 -36.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a
letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.

FUNGAL CELLULASE; PRODUCTION AND APPLICATIONS:

MINIREVIEW
Amer Ahmed
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, The Islamia University of
Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
aa.biotechiub@gmail.com
Aasia Bibi
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur,
Bahawalpur, Pakistan
aasiabibi40@yahoo.com

Abstract
Cellulose is the most abundant biomaterial derived from the living organisms on the earth; plant
is the major contributor to the cellulose pool present in the biosphere. Cellulose is used in
variety of applications ranging from nanomaterials to biofuel production. For biofuel
production, cellulose has first to be broken-down into its building blocks; β-D-glucosyl unit
which subsequently can be fermented to different product such as ethanol, acetic acids, among
others. Cellulase is the enzymatic system, which degrades cellulose chains to glucose monomers.
Cellulase is a group of three enzymes endoglucanase, exoglucanases and β-glucosidases which
act together to hydrolyze cellulose to glucose units. Cellulases are found in bacteria, fungi,
plants, and some animals. Fungi are the preferred source of cellulase for industrial applications
since they secrete large quantities of cellulase to culture medium. Despite a remarkable number
of fungi found to produce cellulase enzymes, few have been extensively investigated because they
produce large quantities of these enzymes extracellularly. In this mini-review, the production of
cellulase from fungi and the parameters affecting cellulase production are discussed briefly on

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 19

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

light of recent publications. Furthermore, potential applications of cellulase enzymes are

highlighted.
Keywords
Fungi, Cellulase, Production, Optimization, RSM, Application, Biofuel

1. Introduction
Cellulose is the most abundant biomaterial derived from the living organisms on the
earth. Plant is the major contributor to the cellulose pool in the biosphere being synthesized
through the process of photosynthesis. Thus it is the major constituent of plant biomass followed
by hemicellulose and lignin (Nidhi et al. 2017, Saxena et al. 2009). Chemically, cellulose
consists of β-D-glucopyranoside units that are linked together via β-D-glucosyl bonds (Ahmed et
al. 2017b). Despite the fact that cellulose potentially can be used in wide range of applications
from nanomaterials to biofuel production, majority of cellulose, annual production estimated 1.5
x 1012 tons, is being wasted (Al-Kharousi et al. 2015). For the cellulose to be utilized in various
industrial applications it needs first to be converted into its building blocks (Glucose) by the
hydrolysis of β-D-(1,4) glucosidic linkages. Naturally, cellulose degradation is mediated by an
enzymatic system referred to as cellulases. Cellulase is a group of three individual enzymes
namely endoglucanase (endo-1,4-β-D-glucanase (EG), EC 3.2.1.4), cellobiohydrolase (exo-1,4-
β-D-glucanase (CBH), EC 3.2.1.91), and β-glucosidase (1,4-β-D-glucosidase (BG), EC 3.2.1.21)
(Dashtban et al. 2010). These enzymes work synergistically to degrade cellulose to glucose units
which can then be used in various biotechnological applications such as textile, paper and pulp
industry, laundry industry, biofuel production and amino acids synthesis (Ahmed et al. 2017b,
Imran et al. 2016, Sun and Cheng 2002). Microorganisms are the major contributor to cellulose
degradation and carbon recycling (Lynd et al. 2002). Cellulases are synthesized by bacteria,
fungi, plants and some animals, and anaerobic microorganisms are known to produce single
discrete cellulase system known as cellulosome, more powerful and efficient system for cellulose
degradation. Cellulosome, since its discovery, has been worked out and reviewed by many
experts (Ahmed et al. 2017a, Artzi et al. 2017, Doi and Kosugi 2004, Zhang Xiao‐Zhou and
Zhang 2013). For the last three decades cellulase enzymes have been the focus of many research
groups which aim at its production, characterizations, engineering, and applications in various
industries. The annual sale of cellulase reached up 8% of total enzyme markets and is expected

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 20

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

to exceed the protease market in the future (Horn et al. 2012). Currently many research agencies
are focusing on cellulase production for biomass conversion and biofuel production because the
cost of cellulases is the major obstacle in biomass hydrolysis and industrialization. Fungi are a
crucial contributors to cellulose decomposers, accounting for 80% of the cellulose breakdown in
nature particularly forest ecosystem where fungi play a significant roles in biomass
decomposition. Fungal species known to degrade cellulose encompass members of the
Ascomycota (Hernandez et al. 2018, Timo et al. 2017), Basidiomycota (Baldrian and Valaskova
2008), and chytrids encountered in the rumen of some animals. Remarkably, aerobic fungi are
known to secrete large quantities of extracellular cellulase making them preferable for industry
comparably to anaerobic fungi which are known to synthesize multi-enzyme complexes,
cellulosome, bound to cell surface making its recovery ultimately difficult (Imran et al. 2016,
Quiroz-Castañeda and Folch-Mallol 2013). Cellulases have been produced and characterized
from different aerobic fungi such as Aspergillus (Bansal et al. 2012), Trichoderma (Ellilä et al.
2017), Penicillium (Prasanna et al. 2016), among others. The present mini-review aims to briefly
discuss the production of fungal cellulases with focus on the parameters affecting their
production on light of recent publications. It will also discuss the various potential applications
of cellulases in various industrial sectors.

2. Production of Cellulases
Enzymes production is the first crucial step in enzyme technology which needs to be paid
much attention since it determines the economic feasibility of the process. Considerable number
of cellulase has been produced from fungal species such as Aspergillus ornatus (Toor and Ilyas
2014), Penicillium sp. (Picart et al. 2007, Prasanna et al. 2016), Aspergillus terreus MS105
(Sohail et al. 2016), Aspergillus terreus M1 (Gao et al. 2008), Aspergillus niger and Rhizopus sp.
(Santos et al. 2016), Aspergillus niger (Baig and Saleem 2012), Trichoderma longibrachiatum
(Pachauri et al. 2017), Beauveria Bassiana (Petlamul et al. 2017), among many others.
2.1 Factor Affecting Cellulase Production
Several fermentation conditions play fundamental roles on cellulases production, among
which fermentation method, carbon source, nitrogen source, pH, temperature, salt/metal ions
effect, incubation time, aerations, and fungal species (Norouzian 2008, Okoye et al. 2013, Saini
et al. 2017).

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 21

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

2.1.1 Fermentation Method

Fungal cellulases have been produced through solid state fermentation (SSF) and
submerged fermentation (SmF). In SSF, the fungal species is grown on one or more solid
substrate such as rice straw, wheat bran, corn husk, cassava cake, or sugar cane bagasse without
or very low water content. The grown microorganism utilized the solid substrate steadily and
slowly thus under SSF condition, the microorganism can be grown for long period of time, for
instance, for several days (Ahmed et al. 2017). The high productivity, cheap substrate utilization,
low energy requirement are the advantages of SSF. Moreover, under SSF conditions, there is
minimal water output and lacking of foam up which make it economically feasible (Faisal and
Benjamin 2016). SSF shortcomings are limited to heat generation and lack of knowledge on
automation (Ahmed et al. 2017, Shweta 2015, Soccol et al. 2017). SSF has been utilized for
cellulase production from several fungal species such as lichtheimia romosa (Garcia et al. 2015),
Phaffomycetaceae (Cerda et al. 2017), Dipodascaceae (Cerda et al. 2017), Trichoderma
citrinoviride AUKAR04 (Periyasamy et al. 2017), Humicola insolens MTCC 1433 (Singla and
Taggar 2017), among many others. On the other hand, in SMF, free flowing liquid like molasses
and or broths supplemented with different nutrients is used to cultivate of microorganisms. The
enzymes including cellulase and metabolic byproducts are secreted into fermentation medium
and medium supplements or nutrients are rapidly utilized and a continuous supply with is
needed. SMF has several advantages such as simplicity of sterilization, heat and mass transfer,
process monitoring (pH, temperature, and soluble molecules) and automation, and extraction and
recovery of enzymes and bioactives (Ahmed et al. 2017). Several cellulase enzymes have been
produced by SMF from different fungal species including Aspergillus flavus (Gomathi et al.
2012), Aspergillus Niger FC-1(Jiang et al. 2013), Aspergillus niger (Reddy et al. 2015), among
many others.
2.1.2 Carbon Source
Carbon source is the major factor affecting the cellulases production, attributing to the
fact that cellulases are inducible enzymes that are expressed by cells in response to different
carbon source present in the fermentation medium (Saini et al. 2017, Zhang Y. et al. 2017). For
instance, optimal cellulase production from Hypocrea jecorina QM6a, QM9414, and RUTC-30
was attained in medium containing microcrystalline celluloses as the sole carbon source
(Dashtban et al. 2011). Penicillium sp. produced the highest cellulases activity on lactose

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 22

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

containing media among different carbon sources tested such as sarbose, maltose, sucrose,
lactose, dextrose, galactose, cellobiose, and CMC (Prasanna et al. 2016). Expression of different
cellulase isoforms in response to carbon source has also been reported (Amore et al. 2013). For
examples, Aspergillus terreus expressed four endoglucanase (EG) isoforms in presence of rice
straw as solid substrate or corn cobs liquid substrate. Similarly, supplementation of fructose and
cellobiose to corn cobs medium up-regulates at least one of EG while adding mannitol, ethanol
and glycerol selectively suppressed the expression of three EG isoforms. Similarly four isoforms
of β-glucosidase (βG) was expressed in presence of corn cob containing medium and addition of
glucose, cellobiose, mannitol, fructose, sucrose or glycerol repressed of one or more βG isoforms
(Nazir et al. 2010). Aspergillus fumigatus Z5 grown on culture media containing glucose, avicel,
and rice straw secreted 61, 125, and 152 proteins, respectively. Proteomic analysis suggested that
glycoside hydrolases including cellulases, hemicellulases were overexpressed on rice straw and
avicel containing media compared to glucose used as carbon sources (Liu et al. 2013). The
molecular mechanisms by which the expression of these different isoforms are regulated and
different carbon sources influence the quantity and isoforms expression are not well established
which hampered genetic engineering of these fungi for industrial purpose (Coradetti et al. 2012).
Thus understanding the mechanisms of cellulase expression hold a critical significance for
enhancement of cellulase enzymes production and have been investigated in Aspergillus and
Trichoderma (Gautam et al. 2011). These fungi produce extracellular cellulase enzymes when
they are grown on media containing plant polymers, or short oligosaccharides as an energy
source, and when cultivated on media containing easily metabolizable sugar such as glucose, the
expression of these enzymes is repressed. Carbon catabolite repression is considered the most
acceptable mechanism to repress cellulase production when grown on easily metabolizable
sugars (Antonella et al. 2013).
Recently Zhang et al published a study demonstrated that Rhizopus stolonifera host a
gene which encode for cellobiose synthetase (CBS) to synthesize cellobiose from uridine
diphosphate glucose (UDPG). CBS was found to play a fundamental role in expression of
cellulase gene through the induction of the cellobiose-responsive regulators CLR1 and CLR2 and
thus inducing the transcription of cellulase genes. The author suggested that minimal constitutive
expression of cellulase may be driven by cellobiose synthesized by CBS from carbohydrate
metabolites (Zhang Y. et al. 2017).

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 23

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

2.1.2 Nitrogen Source

Another important factor affect protein secretion in fungi is nitrogen. Different nitrogen
source can be included in fermentation medium for cellulase production. Among organic
nitrogen source that’s can be used are peptone, yeast or beef extract, tryptone or soybean meal.
Inorganic nitrogen source like ammonium sulphate, ammonium chloride, ammonium hydrogen
phosphate can also be used as a nitrogen source (Ahmed et al. 2017c, Kachlishvili et al. 2006).
Optimum cellulase activity was achieved from Penicillium sp. when cultivated on yeast extract
containing medium (Prasanna et al. 2016). Trichoderma reesei showed optimum production of
cellulase when cultivated on Parthenium biomass containing ammonium molybdate, peptone or
yeast extracts as nitrogen source (Saini et al. 2017).
2.1.3 pH and Temperature
Optimization of parameters such as pH and temperature is also of crucial significance for
enzyme production since these physicochemical parameter affect the growth of microorganism
hence the bioactives production. The optimal cellulase production from Penicillium sp was
attained on Czapek-Dox medium at pH 5.0 and 30˚C (Prasanna et al. 2016). Similarly, optimum
production of celllulase by Aspergillus tubingensis KY615746 was achieved at pH 4, and
temperature of 30 °C (El-Nahrawy et al. 2017).
2.1.4 Incubation Time
Myceliophthora heterothallica produced the highest endoglucanase on SSF containing
wheat bran or sugarcane occurred at 192 hours and on SmF containing cardboard at 168 hours
(Teixeira da Silva et al. 2016). Optimal production of carboxymethylcellulase (CMCase) from
Aspergillus hortai under SMF was achieved after 96 h (El-Hadi et al. 2014).
2.2 Statistical Approach for Optimization of Cellulase Production
Optimization of cellulases production is critical process for efficient and cost-effective
cellulase production. Traditionally optimization of cellulase production is carried out by
employing One Variable at A time (OVAT) approach. OVAT involves varying one parameter at
a time keeping other factors constant. OVAT is regarded as a laborious technique, time
consuming and misleading approach because these parameters are independent and OVAT tend
to ignore the interactions between them, in addition to extensive time needed to perform large
number of experiments.

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 24

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Statistical approaches such as Surface Response Methodology and Plackett–Burman

Design is an efficient approach employed for optimization of fermentation parameters (Shajahan
et al. , Singh et al. 2014). Several studies have employed statistical methods for optimization of
cellulase production. Cellulase production from Trichoderma reesei was optimized using
Plackett-Burman design of 9 nutrients for their influence on cellulase secretion using Response
Surface Methodology (RSM). The study demonstrated that the optimal concentration of avicel,
soybean cake flour, KH2PO4, and CoCl2·6H2O for cellulase production were 25.30 g/l, 23.53 g/l,
4.90 g/L, and 0.95 g/l, respectively (Saravanan et al. 2012). In another study, using statistical
Full Factorial Design (FFD), optimal cellulase production from Penicillium funiculosum
ATCC11797 was achieved on culture media containing avicel (10 g/l) as carbon source, urea
(1.2 g/l), yeast extract (1.0 g/l), KH2PO4 (6.0 g/l), and MgSO4⋅7H2O (1.2 g/l) with an agitation
speed of 220 rpm and aeration rate of 0.6 vvm. These conditions resulted in activities of 508 U/l
for FPase, 9,204 U/l for endoglucanase, and 2,395 U/l for 𝛽-glucosidase which are 3.6-9.5 times
higher than production using non-optimized conditions (de Albuquerque de Carvalho et al.
2014). Cellulase production from Trichoderma reesei RUT C-30 was optimized employing a two
stage statistical design namely Fractional Factorial Design and Response Surface Box Behnken Design
on wheat bran and cellulose under SSF. This approach resulted in a 3.2-fold increase in CMCase
production to 959.53 IU/gDS (Idris et al. 2017). The statistical approach for optimization of
fermentation conditions are considered efficient because the interaction of multiple variables are
taken into consideration and the number of experiments needed to be performed are reduced to
minimum (Ahmed et al. 2017, Shajahan et al. 2017, Singh et al. 2014).

3. Application of Cellulases
Cellulases, over many decades, are used in various industrial applications, securing the
third rank among enzymes annual sale and expected to exceed the protease in the near future
(Menendez et al. 2015). Cellulase enzymes have got tremendous applications in different
industries including biofuel production, paper and pulp industry, detergent industries, animal
feeds among others.
3.1 Biomass Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production
Cellulase along with other enzymes is used in the hydrolysis of biomass into sugar and
other chemicals. Sugar either hexoses or pentoses are then fermented to bioethanol or other fuel.

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 25

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

With the rapid increase in world population accompanied by increase demand of energy,
depletion of fossil fuel, and enhanced greenhouse effect from traditional fuel, there is crucial
need to develop or search for cheap, renewable and sustainable sources of energy. Thus
cellulases involves in biofuel productions and minimization of energy crisis and environmental
pollution (Horn et al. 2012, Sharada et al. 2014). However, the bioconversion of pretreated
cellulose-based materials at the industrial level into fermentable sugars employ a mixture of
enzymes for complete hydrolysis, of which the cost is very high, making biorefining processes
economically unfeasible. Thus the search of biocatalysts such as cellulases with novel properties
exemplified by high thermostabilty, acidophilicity and high solvent tolerance could help to
overcome the cost hurdles. Cellulases application in biomass hydrolysis and biofuel productions
is currently the subject of numerous studies supported by different agencies across the world
(Budihal et al. 2016, Srivastava et al. 2015).
3.2 Paper and Pulp Industry
Cellulases are used in the paper and pulp industry which has expanded significantly in the
last decades from 320 to 395 million tons (Przybysz Buzała et al. 2016). Pulping process can be
achieved either through mechanical or biomechanical manners. Mechanical pulping such as
refining and grinding of the woody raw material results in pulps containing high content of fines,
bulk, and stiffness. On the other hand, biomechanical pulping employing enzymes such as
cellulases results in around 20–40% energy savings during refining making the process
economically feasible and significantly improved hand-sheet strength properties (Demuner et al.
2011, Sharada et al. 2014). It has also been reported that addition of cellulases enhanced the
bleachability of softwood kraft pulp and improve the final brightness score comparable to that of
xylanase treatment (Kuhad et al. 2011).
3.3 Waste Management
Cellulase can be used in waste management. For instance, cellulases are used in the
conversion of cellulosic municipal solid wastes to desirable chemicals and energy. Cellulases
benefits in minimizing the effect of cellulose waste on our environment and driving the
conversion of the pollutants to an alternative source of energy and chemicals thus displacing our
growing dependence on fossil fuels (Bayer et al. 2007, Gautam et al. 2011, Kuhad et al. 2011a).
3.4 Animal Feed Industry

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 26

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Cellulase has a great potential to be used in the animal feeds industry. Cellulase can be
used in the pretreatment of agricultural silage and grain feed to enhance nutritional value and
performance of animals (Kuhad et al. 2011). Similarly, addition of cellulase, along with other
enzymes, can eliminate anti-nutritional factors present in the feed grains such as arabinoxylans,
cellulose, dextrins, inulin, lignin, pectins, β-glucan, and oligosaccharides by degrading them.
This in turn enhances the nutritional value and improves animal’s health and performance
(Asmare 2014, Murad and Azzaz 2010, Sharada et al. 2014).
3.5 Laundry and Detergent Industry
Cellulases are also used in the laundry and detergent industry which is one of the most
popular markets for enzymes sale accounting for 20-30%, with lipase and proteases are major
enzymatic component. An innovative approach recently adopted in this industry is the use of
alkaline cellulases, protease and lipase results in a crucial improvement of color brightness and
dirt removal from the cotton blend garments (Juturu and Wu 2014, Olsen and Falholt 1998).
3.6 Textile Industry
The most successful and popular application of cellulases is textile industry. Cellulases
are used in textile wet processing such as finishing of cellulose-based textiles, biostoning of
jeans and biopolishing of cotton and other cellulosic fabrics in order to improve hand and
appearance (Arja 2007, Duran and Duran 2000, Juturu and Wu 2014).
3.7 Wine and Beverage Industry
Cellulase enzymes along with glucanase can be used to improve both quality and yields
of the fermented products such as wine and beverages. For examples, during wine production,
cellulase, pectinases, glucanases, and hemicellulases are used to improve color extraction, skin
maceration, must clarification, filtration, and finally the wine quality and stability. Addition of β-
glucosidases can increase the aroma of wines by hydrolyzing glycosylated precursors into their
aglycones and glucose (Araujo et al. 2008, Kuhad et al. 2011).
3.8 Other Applications
Cellulases have also been applied in agriculture where they are used to hydrolyze the cell
wall of plant pathogens thus controlling the plant infection and diseases. Many cellulolytic fungi
including Trichoderma sp., Geocladium sp., Chaetomium sp., and Penicillium sp. are known to
play a key role in agriculture by enhancing the seed germination, rapid plant growth and
flowering, improved root system and increased crop yields (Behera et al. 2016, Kuhad et al.

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 27

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

2011). Cellulases have also been used for the improvement of the soil quality (Phitsuwan et al.
2013). In addition, cellulases are used in food processing during fruit and vegetable juices
manufacturing to improve extraction (Sharada et al. 2014, Zhang Xiao‐Zhou and Zhang 2013).
Furthermore, applications of cellulases along with macerating enzymes has been found to
increase extraction of olive oil under cold processing conditions and to improve its antioxidants
and vitamin E contents (Aliakbarian et al. 2011, Sharma et al. 2015). Moreover, humans is
known to poorly digest cellulose fiber and taking a digestive enzyme product containing
cellulases like Digestin help to relieve digestive problems such as malabsorption (Gurung et al.
2013, Sharada et al. 2014). Finally, an interest in applying cellulases enzymes in chemical
analysis such as diagnostic and food analysis has been considered (Li et al. 2012).

4. Conclusion
The increase demand of energy and natural products combines with increase in the
demand of industrial enzymes such as cellulases being critical enzymes in degradation of
biomass and biofuel production. The major hurdle in the production of biofuel and other
products from biomass is the lack of efficient economically feasible cellulase. Microorganisms
represent a part of the solution of this problem because they can produce a robust set of enzymes
to degrade biomass i.e., cellulase, hemicellulase and lignin degrading enzymes. Fungi have the
advantage over other microbes because of their ability to secrete large quantities of biomass-
degrading enzymes when grown on cheap substrates. Although remarkable work has been
performed on production, characterization of cellulases from different fungi, future studies
should focus on manipulation of cellulase research by gene and protein engineering to enhance
the efficiency of biomass degradation and bioconversion. Application of statistical methods for
optimizations of cellulase production on SmC and SSF from fungi is another frontier in cellulase
research. Similarly, understanding transcription regulation of cellulase and other biomass
degrading enzymes is significant to designing the best culture conditions for production of the
best enzymes.
References
Ahmed A, Aslam M, Ashraf M, ul-Hassan Nasim F, Batool K, Bibi A. (2017a). Microbial ß-
Glucosidases: Screening, Characterization, Cloning and Applications. Journal of Applied
& Environmental Microbiology, 5, 57-73, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/jaem-5-2-2

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 28

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Ahmed A, Nasim Fu-H, Batool K, Bibi A. (2017b). Microbial β-Glucosidase: Sources,

Production and Applications. Journal of Applied & Environmental Microbiology 5:31-
46, DOI: 10.12691/jaem-5-1-4.
Al-Kharousi MM, Sivakumar N, Elshafie A. (2015). Characterization of cellulase enzyme
produced by Chaetomium sp. isolated from books and archives. EurAsian Journal of
BioSciences, 9, 52-60. DOI: 10.5053/ejobios.2015.9.0.7
Aliakbarian B, De Faveri D, Casazza A, Oliveira R, Oliveira M, Converti A, Perego P. (2011).
Bio-extraction of olive oil: improvement of quality and extraction outputs: Citeseer.
Amore A, Giacobbe S, Faraco V. (2013). Regulation of cellulase and hemicellulase gene
expression in fungi. Current Genomics, 14, 230-249, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202911314040002
Araujo R, Casal M, CavacoPaulo A. (2008). Application of enzymes for textile fibres processing.
Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, 26, 332-349, Doi.org
https://doi.org/10.1080/10242420802390457
Arja M-O. (2007). Cellulases in the textile industry. Industrial enzymes, (pp 51-63), Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5377-0_4
Artzi L, Bayer EA, Morais S. (2017). Cellulosomes: bacterial nanomachines for dismantling
plant polysaccharides. Nature Review Microbiology, 15, 83-95, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.164
Asmare B. (2014). Biotechnological Advances for Animal Nutrition and Feed Improvement.
World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2, 115-118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/wjar-
2-3-5
Baig S, Saleem M. (2012). Production and characterization of cellulases of Aspergillus niger by
using rice husk and saw dust as substrates. Pakistan Journal of Botany (Pakistan), 44,
377-382.
Baldrian P, Valaskova V. (2008). Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS
Microbiology Review, 32, 501-521, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-
6976.2008.00106.x
Bansal N, Tewari R, Soni R, Soni SK. (2012). Production of cellulases from Aspergillus niger
NS-2 in solid state fermentation on agricultural and kitchen waste residues. Waste
Management 32, 1341-1346, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.03.006

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 29

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Bayer EA, Lamed R, Himmel ME. (2007). The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for
cellulosic waste management. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 18, 237-245, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2007.04.004
Behera B, Sethi B, Mishra R, Dutta S, Thatoi H. (2016). Microbial cellulases–Diversity &
biotechnology with reference to mangrove environment: A review. Journal of Genetic
Engineering and Biotechnology. 15, 197-210 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.12.001
Budihal, S., R., D. Agsar, and S. Patil, R. (2016). Enhanced production and application of
acidothermophilic Streptomyces cellulase. Bioresource Technology. 200, 706-712. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.098
Cerda A, Gea T, Vargas-García MC, Sánchez A. (2017). Towards a competitive solid state
fermentation: Cellulases production from coffee husk by sequential batch operation and
role of microbial diversity. Science of The Total Environment, 589, 56-65, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.184
Coradetti ST, Craig JP, Xiong Y, Shock T, Tian C, Glass NL. (2012). Conserved and essential
transcription factors for cellulase gene expression in ascomycete fungi. Proceedings of
the national academy of sciences 109, 7397-7402, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200785109
Dashtban M, Buchkowski R, Qin W. (2011). Effect of different carbon sources on cellulase
production by Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) strains. International Journal of
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, 2, 274-286.
Dashtban M, Maki M, Leung KT, Mao C, Qin W. (2010). Cellulase activities in biomass
conversion: measurement methods and comparison. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology,
30, 302-309, Doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2010.490938
De Albuquerque de Carvalho ML, Carvalho DF, de Barros Gomes E, Nobuyuki Maeda R, Melo
Santa Anna LM, Castro AMd, Pereira N. (2014). Optimisation of Cellulase Production by
Penicillium funiculosum in a Stirred Tank Bioreactor Using Multivariate Response
Surface Analysis. Enzyme Research, 2014, pp: 8, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/703291
Demuner BJ, Pereira Junior N, Antunes AMS. (2011). Technology Prospecting on Enzymes for
the Pulp and Paper Industry. 6, 11. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000300011
Doi RH, Kosugi A. (2004). Cellulosomes: plant-cell-wall-degrading enzyme complexes. Nature
Reviews Microbiology, 2, 541-551, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro925

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 30

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Duran N, Duran M. (2000). Enzyme applications in the textile industry. Coloration Technology,
30, 41-44, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2000.tb03779.x
El-Hadi AA, El-Nour SA, Hammad A, Kamel Z, Anwar M. (2014). Optimization of cultural and
nutritional conditions for carboxymethylcellulase production by Aspergillus hortai.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 7, 23-28,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2013.11.003
El-Nahrawy s, Metwally M, Abd El-Kodoos RY, Belal E-SB, Shabana SA, El-Refai IM. (2017).
Optimization of culture conditions for production of cellulase by Aspergillus tubingensis
KY615746 using rice straw waste. Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security 1, 177-
189, DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs.2017.1525.1007
Ellilä S, Fonseca L, Uchima C, Cota J, Goldman GH, Saloheimo M, Sacon V, Siika-aho M.
(2017). Development of a low-cost cellulase production process using Trichoderma
reesei for Brazilian biorefineries. Biotechnology for Biofuels 10, 30,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0717-0
Faisal PA, Benjamin S. (2016). Optimization of Parameters for the Production of Cellulase from
Achromobacter xylosoxidans BSS4 by Solid-State Fermentation. Electronic Journal of
Biology, 12, 4.
Gao J, Weng H, Zhu D, Yuan M, Guan F, Xi Y. (2008). Production and characterization of
cellulolytic enzymes from the thermoacidophilic fungal Aspergillus terreus M11 under
solid-state cultivation of corn stover. Bioresource Technology, 99, 7623-7629,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.005
Gautam SP, Bundela PS, Pandey AK, Khan J, Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S. (2011). Optimization for
the Production of Cellulase Enzyme from Municipal Solid Waste Residue by Two Novel
Cellulolytic Fungi. Biotechnology Research International, 2011, pp 8,
https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/810425
Gomathi D, Muthulakshmi C, Kumar DG, Ravikumar G, Kalaiselvi M, Uma C. (2012).
Submerged fermentation of wheat bran by Aspergillus flavus for production and
characterization of carboxy methyl cellulase. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical
Biomedicine 2, S67-S73, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60132-4

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 31

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Gurung N, Ray S, Bose S, Rai V. (2013). A Broader View: Microbial Enzymes and Their
Relevance in Industries, Medicine, and Beyond. BioMed Research International, 2013,
PP 18, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/329121
Hernandez C, Milagres AMF, Vazquez-Marrufo G, Munoz-Paez KM, Garcia-Perez JA, Alarcon
E. (2018). An ascomycota coculture in batch bioreactor is better than polycultures for
cellulase production. Folia Microbiology (Praha). (Accepted). Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-018-0588-1
Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink V. (2012). Novel enzymes for the degradation
of cellulose. Biotechnology for biofuels, 5, 45, https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-45
Idris ASO, Pandey A, Rao SS, Sukumaran RK. (2017). Cellulase production through solid-state
tray fermentation, and its use for bioethanol from sorghum stover. Bioresource
Technology 242, 265-271, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.092
Imran M, Anwar Z, Irshad M, Asad MJ, Ashfaq H. (2016). Cellulase production from species of
fungi and bacteria from agricultural wastes and its utilization in industry: A review.
Advances in Enzyme Research 4, 44, Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/aer.2016.42005
Jiang SY, (2013). Cellulase Production by Submerged Fermentation Using Biological Materials
of Corncob Residue with Aspergillus Niger FC-1. Advanced Materials Research, 648,
116-119, Doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.648.116
Juturu V, Wu JC. (2014). Microbial cellulases: engineering, production and applications.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 33, 188-203,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.077
Kachlishvili E, Penninckx MJ, Tsiklauri N, Elisashvili V. (2006). Effect of nitrogen source on
lignocellulolytic enzyme production by white-rot basidiomycetes under solid-state
cultivation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 22, 391-397, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-005-9046-8
Kuhad R, C., Gupta R, Singh A. (2011). Microbial Cellulases and Their Industrial Applications.
Enzyme Research, 2011, PP 10, https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/280696
Li S, Yang X, Yang S, Zhu M, Wang X. (2012). Technology Prospecting on Enzymes:
Application, Marketing and Engineering. Computational and Structural Biotechnology
Journal, 2, e201209017, Doi: https://doi.org/10.5936/csbj.201209017

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 32

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Liu D, Li J, Zhao S, Zhang R, Wang M, Miao Y, Shen Y, Shen Q. (2013). Secretome diversity
and quantitative analysis of cellulolytic Aspergillus fumigatus Z5 in the presence of
different carbon sources. Biotechnology for biofuels, 6, 149, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-149
Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. (2002). Microbial Cellulose Utilization:
Fundamentals and Biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66,
506-577. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002
Menendez E, Garcia-Fraile P, Rivas R. (2015). Biotechnological applications of bacterial
cellulases. AIMS Bioengineering, 2, 163-182, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.163
Murad H, Azzaz H. (2010). Cellulase and dairy animal feeding. Biotechnology, 9, 238-256, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2010.238.256
Nazir A, Soni R, Saini HS, Kaur A, Chadha BS. (2010). Profiling differential expression of
cellulases and metabolite footprints in Aspergillus terreus. Applied Biochemistry and
Biotechnology, 162, 538-547, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8775-9
Nidhi C, Sharma B, Singh PK. (2017). Energy Value in Biomass and Plastic Components of
Municipal Solid Waste Matter, International Journal of Science and Technology, 3, 82-
90, Doi: https://doi.org/10.20319/mijst.2017.32.8092
Norouzian D. (2008). Effect of Different Factors on Fermentative Production of Enzymes by
Fungi. Dynamic Biochemistry, Process Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, 2, 14-18.
Okoye I, Ezugwu A, Udenwobele D, Eze S, Anyawu C, Chilaka F. (2013). Production and
Partial Characterization of Cellulases from Apergillus fumigatus Using Two Distinct
Parts of Corn Cob as Carbon Sources. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 26, 50-59.
Olsen HS, Falholt P. (1998). The role of enzymes in modern detergency. Journal of Surfactants
and Detergents 1:555-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-998-0058-7
Pachauri P, V A, More S, Sullia SB, Deshmukh S. (2017). Purification and characterization of
cellulase from a novel isolate of Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Biofuels, 1-7,
https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1345357
Periyasamy K, Santhalembi L, Mortha G, Aurousseau M, Guillet A, Dallerac D, Sivanesan S.
(2017). Production, partial purification and characterization of enzyme cocktail from

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 33

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Trichoderma citrinoviride AUKAR04 through solid-state fermentation. Arabian Journal

for Science and Engineering 42, 53-63, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-016-2110-x
Petlamul W, Sripornngam T, Buakwan N, Buakaew S, Mahamad K. (2017). The Capability of
Beauveria Bassiana for Cellulase Enzyme Production. Pp 62-66. Proceedings of the 7th
International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3051166.3051167
Phitsuwan P, Laohakunjit N, Kerdchoechuen O, Kyu KL, Ratanakhanokchai K. (2013). Present
and potential applications of cellulases in agriculture, biotechnology, and bioenergy.
Folia microbiologica, 58, 163-176, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-012-0184-8
Picart P, Diaz P, Pastor F. (2007). Cellulases from two Penicillium sp. strains isolated from
subtropical forest soil: production and characterization. Letters in Applied Microbiology,
45, 108-113, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02148.x
Prasanna HN, Ramanjaneyulu G, Rajasekhar Reddy B. (2016). Optimization of cellulase
production by Penicillium sp. 3 Biotech 6, 162, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-
0483-x
Przybysz Buzała K, Przybysz P, Kalinowska H, Derkowska M. (2016). Effect of Cellulases and
Xylanases on Refining Process and Kraft Pulp Properties. PLOS ONE, 11, e0161575,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161575
Quiroz-Castañeda RE, Folch-Mallol JL. (2013). Hydrolysis of biomass mediated by cellulases
for the production of sugars. Sustainable degradation of lignocellulosic biomass-
techniques, applications and commercialization, InTech. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.5772/53719
Reddy GPK, Narasimha G, Kumar KD, Ramanjaneyulu G, Ramya A, Kumari BS, Reddy BR.
(2015). Cellulase production by Aspergillus niger on different natural lignocellulosic
substrates. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 4, 835-
845.
Saini A, Aggarwal NK, Yadav A. (2017). Cost-effective cellulase production using Parthenium
hysterophorus biomass as an unconventional lignocellulosic substrate. 3 Biotech 7, 12.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0604-1
Santos TCD, Arbreu Filho G, Brito ARD, Pires AJV, Bonomo RCE, Franco M. (2016).
Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes by aspergillus niger and rhizopus

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 34

LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

sp. By solid state fermentation of prickly pear. Revista Caatinga, 29, 222-233,
https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252016v29n126rc
Saravanan P, Muthuvelayudham R, Viruthagiri T. (2012). Application of Statistical Design for
the Production of Cellulase by Trichoderma reesei Using Mango Peel. Enzyme Research
2012, 7, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/157643
Saxena R, Adhikari D, Goyal H. (2009). Biomass-based energy fuel through biochemical routes:
a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 167-178,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.011
Shajahan S, Moorthy IG, Sivakumar N, Selvakumar G (2017). Statistical modeling and
optimization of cellulase production by Bacillus licheniformis NCIM 5556 isolated from
the hot spring, Maharashtra, India. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 29, 302-
310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2016.08.001
Sharada R, Venkateswarlu G, Venkateswar S, AnandRao M. (2014). Applications Of Cellulases
: Review. International Journal Of Pharmaceutical, Chemical and Biological Science, 4,
424-437.
Sharma R, Sharma PC, Rana JC, Joshi VK. (2015). Improving the Olive Oil Yield and Quality
Through Enzyme‐Assisted Mechanical Extraction, Antioxidants and Packaging. Journal
of Food Processing and Preservation, 39, 157-166, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12216
Shweta A. (2015). Solid state fermentation for cellulase production. Biotechnological Research,
1, 108-112.
Singh K, Richa K, Bose H, Karthik L, Kumar G, Bhaskara Rao KV. (2014). Statistical media
optimization and cellulase production from marine Bacillus VITRKHB. 3 Biotech, 4,
591-598, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-013-0173-x
Singla D, Taggar MS. (2017). Production of Cellulases by Solid State Fermentation of Different
Agricultural Residues Using Humicola insolens MTCC 1433. International Journal
Current Microbiology Applied Science, 6, 1409-1418,
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.611.168
Soccol CR, Costa ESFd, Letti LAJ, Karp SG, Woiciechowski AL, Vandenberghe LPdS. (2017).
Recent developments and innovations in solid state fermentation. Biotechnology
Research and Innovation, 1, 52-71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2017.01.002

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 35

 LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences
ISSN 2454-5872

Sohail M, Ahmad A, Khan SA. (2016). Production of cellulase from Aspergillus terreus MS105
on crude and commercially purified substrates. 3 Biotech, 6, 103, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0420-z
Srivastava N, Srivastava M, Mishra P, Singh P, Ramteke P. (2015). Application of cellulases in
biofuels industries: an overview. Journal of Biofuels and Bioenergy, 1, 55-63, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-8618.2015.00007.3
Sun Y, Cheng J. (2002). Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review.
Bioresource Technology, 83, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00212-7
Teixeira da Silva VdC, xe1, ssia, de Souza Coto AL, de Carvalho Souza R, Bertoldi Sanchez
Neves M, Gomes E, Bonilla-Rodriguez GO. (2016). Effect of pH, Temperature, and
Chemicals on the Endoglucanases and β-Glucosidases from the Thermophilic Fungus
Myceliophthora heterothallica F.2.1.4. Obtained by Solid-State and Submerged
Cultivation. Biochemistry Research International, 2016, PP 9,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9781216
Timo S, Raphael G, Nora B, Scott EB, Steven WS. (2017). Thermoascus aurantiacus is an
Intriguing Host for the Industrial Production of Cellulases. Current Biotechnology, 6, 89-
97, Doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/2211550105666160520123504
Toor Y, Ilyas U. (2014). Optimization of cellulase production by Aspergillus ornatus by the solid
state fermentation of Cicer arietinum. American Journal of Research, 2, 125-141.
Zhang XZ, Zhang YHP. (2013). Cellulases: characteristics, sources, production, and
applications. Bioprocessing Technologies in Biorefinery for Sustainable Production of
Fuels, Chemicals, and Polymers, 1, 131-146, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118642047.ch8
Zhang Y, Tang B, Du G. (2017). Self-induction system for cellulase production by cellobiose
produced from glucose in Rhizopus stolonifer. Scientific Reporpt, 7, 10161, Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10964-0

Available Online at: http://grdspublishing.org/ 36

View publication stats