Engstrom Mirror Case Study
Engstrom Mirror Case Study
Engstrom Mirror Case Study
(HRM 5001)
PGDM
TERM 1
BATCH 2019-2021
FAS L2
ADITYA SHAHRI (19F205)
DAMINI DESUR (19F215)
PRATIK UPADHYAY (19F236)
SAI SUJITH (19F245)
SONALI JAKHAR (19F256)
Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant: Motivating in Good Times and Bad
Problem Recognition –
Engstrom Auto Mirror Plant , a manufacturer of mirrors for automobile
industry, was going through a downturn in performance. Plant-Manager Ron
Bent and his assistant, Joe Haley were convinced that this dip in productivity
and increased anguish among the employees were to be attributed to the low
morale and motivation due to the sudden reduction in payments, specifically
from holding back of bonuses which the employees had been enjoying since
the past few years.
When Ron Bent was appointed as the plant-manager ,he was keen on
deploying a group incentive plan to bring a change in the current situation and
motivate employees to work together and reap the benefits of their hard work
in the form of bonuses from the Scanlon plan.
Bent, after due deliberation and a fair opportunity to the employees to
understand how the Scanlon incentive plan works, instated the same at
Engstrom. The plan gave outstanding results and kept both the employees and
the employers happy for the initial few years, however there were problems
starting to creep up in the process –
The workers had begun to take advantage of the profit sharing/bonus
plan by reducing their work load/under delivering and still securing the
same benefits – Low employee productivity.
Feeling of distrust crept in, employees believed that the employers were
“playing with numbers”, even though they were aware of the bonus
sharing system, they didn’t really have a say about how much
percentage should it be – Lack of motivation and thus disinterested to
take contribute in decisions.
Inequality in the work load shared and yet the same amount of bonus to
everyone started to annoy those who worked comparatively more as
opposed to others who escaped their responsibility and just enjoyed the
benefits – workers restricted their output and avoided responsibility;
they displayed characteristics of Type B personality.
Bent realised that some measure had to be taken immediately to curb this
downturn and get production back on line.
Identification of External & Internal factors which affect the
situation –
INTERNAL FACTORS –
The employees were too set in their “routines” because of the same
set of tasks , hence the motivation to contribute in idea generation
had slacked.
This disinterest led to low productivity among the employees
,harming the company as a whole.
Employees could take part in decision in making but only to the
extent of their work and not their compensation plan, thus later
when the percentage of bonus changed, a feeling of doubt crept in
which made the employees question their employers’ integrity.
This sudden reduction in their income, made the employees hostile
towards the management – seen from Maslow’s Hierarchy the
second level of “security needs” was shaken.
Workers were restricting themselves from delivering to their capacity
and inhibitive to accept changes.
Employers started to perceive every employee as a Type B
personality due to their falling performance.
EXTERNAL FACTORS –
The market downturn which forced the employers to make changes
in the Scanlon Plan affected the employees’ morale.
The following lay-off made the employees sceptical of their future at
Engstrom.
Employees lost their confidence and trust in the Scanlon plan and the
employers.