Project No. 3 Case Study - Cumene Production Plant Simulation

Project No.
3
Case Study – Cumene Production Plant Simulation
In the text Analysis, Synthesis, and Design of Chemical Processes, Richard Turton et al.,
Prentice Hall (1998), there is a description of a cumene production plant. Dr. R. Miller
has modified and simplified this process to produce the following case study. The feed
streams are liquid benzene (20 C, 1 bar, pure) and liquid propene (20 C, 11.66 bar, with
0.0476 mole fraction propane impurity). The product streams are a fuel gas mixture
(90 C, 1.75 bar), liquid cumene (20 C, 1.90 bar, greater than 0.99 mole fraction
cumene) and liquid p-diisopropylbenzene (20 C, 2.10 bar, with significant cumene
impurity).
The benzene plus recycle (from the separations unit) is pumped (to 31.50 bar) and mixed
with the propene, which has been pumped to the same pressure. The mixed feed plus
recycle stream passes through a fired heater, where it is heated to 345 C, and then it is
fed to a packed-bed reactor. Heat is removed from the exothermic reactions occurring in
the reactor, so that the exit temperature is 405 C. The reactor exit stream pressure is
then reduced to 1.75 bar across a valve, and then cooled to 90 C in a product cooler.
This stream is fed to a flash vaporization unit operating at 90 C and 1.75 bar. The flash
overhead is the fuel gas product stream, and the bottoms stream is fed to a two-tower
distillation separations unit. The overhead from the first tower (Tower A) is the recycle
stream, and the bottoms is fed to Tower B. With appropriate cooling, the overhead from
Tower B is the cumene product stream, and the bottoms is the p-diisoproplybenzene
byproduct stream.
At the specified operating conditions, the two towers can be simulated by stream splitters,
with the overhead/bottoms splits indicated below: I will get you information on how to
either set up, or simulate the towers.
Component Tower A Tower B

Benzene 0.992 1.000
Propene 1.000 1.000
Propane 1.000 1.000
Cumene 0.010 0.990
p-DIPB 0.000 0.011
Tower A should produce an overhead product at 57 C and the same pressure as the feed,
and a bottoms product at 179 C and 1.90 bar. To simulate this, the bottoms from the
Tower A stream splitter can be at 57 C and 1.90 bar, and then can be heated at constant
pressure to 179 C prior to being fed to the Tower B simulator. The Tower B simulator
should produce the desired product streams at their specified conditions.
The feed pumps can be assumed to have isentropic efficiencies of 80 %. The feed heater,
reactor, product cooler, and flash unit can be assumed to be isobaric.
The reactions and kinetics for the gas-phase production of cumene (Reaction 1) and
byproduct p-DIPB (Reaction 2) are given below:
C3 H 6  C6 H 6  C9 H12
r1  k1c p cb mol / g cat  s
  24.90 
k1  3.0 x10 4 exp   L2 / mol  g cat  s
 RT 
C3 H 6  C9 H 12  C12 H18
r2  k 2 c p cc
  35.08 
k 2  2.7 x10 6 exp  
 RT 
In these expressions, the concentrations are in mol/L, and the activation energies are in
kcal/mol. The actual reactor bed volume is 6.50 m3, the bed void fraction is 0.50, and the
catalyst particle density is 1600 kg/m3. The rates should be converted from a “per unit
mass of catalyst” basis to a “per unit bed volume” basis before entry into the reactor
simulator. Watch out for the units on the activation energies when you enter them!
Produce a PRO/II simulation of this cumene production process, including a print-out of

the process flow diagram and the complete workbook (Material Streams, Compositions,
Energy Streams, Unit Ops). Use the SRK (Soave-Redlich-Kwong) equation of state for
fluid properties, vapor-liquid equilibria and enthalpy calculations.
CORRECTIONS/UPDATES:
1. Feed rates: Benzene Feed stream 105 kmol/hr. Propylene feed stream 110.27
kmol/hr.
2. Use a heat exchanger instead of a fired heater. I can’t find enough information in
the original source to specify a fired heater
3. For the reactor, I converted the 6.5 m3 of volume to an equivalent volume plug
flow reactor with a single tube (taking into account the volume taken up by
catalyst). cp is the concentration of propylene, cb is the concentration of benzene,
and cc is the concentration of cumene. Temperature in the reaction data is in
Kelvin.
4. I couldn’t get a shortcut column to work right. The first distillation column has
27 actual trays that are 50% efficient. I’m trying the feed at tray 10, though feel
free to adjust that.
5. The second distillation column: 37 trays, 50% efficient., reflux ratio 0.63. I’m
trying the feed at try 15.
Additional Questions:
1. What horsepower feed pumps are required?
2. What is the single-pass per cent conversion of benzene in the reactor?
3. What is the selectivity of cumene to p-DIPB in the reactor?
4. What is the duty for the feed heater? If this energy comes from burning
natural gas (assume pure methane), what natural gas feed rate is required
(SCFH)? Assume that the natural gas is completely burned with 10 % excess
air, and that the flue gases leave the heat transfer zone at 960 C. (Note: Use a
conversion reactor in HYSYS.)
5. What fraction of the duty for the feed heater could be obtained by burning the
fuel gas produced by this process? (Note: Modify your HYSYS simulation
for Part 4 for this calculation.)
6. The condenser and reboiler duties for Tower A are reported to be Qc = -5390
MJ/h and Qr = 7100 MJ/h. Calculate the net duty. How close does this value
agree with the combined duties found for your simulation of Tower A?
7. What is the ratio of benzene in the recycle stream to benzene feed? Plot this
ratio versus reactor exit temperature, for values between 350 C and 450 C.
Also, plot the heater duty versus temperature over the same range. Explain
the advantages of operating at higher temperatures? Speculate on some
possible disadvantages.

Project No. 3 Case Study - Cumene Production Plant Simulation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project No. 3 Case Study - Cumene Production Plant Simulation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project No. 3 Case Study - Cumene Production Plant Simulation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Project No.

Component Tower A Tower B

Produce a PRO/II simulation of this cumene production process, including a print-out of

You might also like