150 Chess Endings Part. 3

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 by Jan van Reek
Fifty-two endgame experts were selected from the over-the-board players. Their 150 best
over-the-boards, theoretical and composed endings got new annotations.
Great innovators are Philidor, Lasker, Botvinnik and Kramnik. Philidor played the first recorded
endgame of acceptable quality. Lasker used endgame technique as a weapon. He approached
perfection in some games. Botvinnik scored wins and saved games by superior analyses of
adjourned games. Kramnik applies all aspects of struggle and prophylaxis with great talent.
Other experts from the list of fifty are Tarrasch, Rubinstein, Capablanca, Euwe, Reshevsky,
Keres, Smyslov, Petrosian, Korchnoi, Fischer, Karpov and Kasparov.
The endings are a small selection from a series of thirty books on chess players as
endgame artists.
The games diverts from the usual order in two ways:

A. Players are rank ordered by year of birth.
B. The round number has been used for the follow-up of the endings by the expert.
(101) Benko,Pal
Benko 1st pr. Magyar Sakkelet 1986 (2), 1928
[JvR]
White has to occupy c4. 1.c4+ [Insufficient is 1.¦h4? ¤b2 2.¢d7 c4 3.¦h5+ (3.¢c7 ¤a4
4.¦h3 ¤xc3!) 3...¢e4 4.¢c6 ¤d1 5.¦h3 ¢f5 6.¢c5 ¢g4!] 1...¢e5 2.¦g4! [Not 2.¦h4? ¤e1!
(the try is 2...¤b2? 3.¢d7 ¤xc4 4.¦xc4 ¢d5 A study by Reti has arisen. 5.¦c2 c4 6.¦c1!)
3.¢d7 ¤f3! 4.¦g4 ¢f5] 2...¤b2 3.¦h4! Zugzwang. 3...¤xc4! 4.¦xc4 ¢d5 5.¦c1! c4
6.¢d7 It is Reti again. 6...¢c5 7.¢c7 ¢d4 8.¢b6 Reworking famous material leads to a
postmodern study. 1–0
CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 1

(102) Fischer,Bobby - Petrosian,Tigran [C12]

Petrosian Curacao 1962 (1), 1929
[JvR]
A great prophylactic player was Tigran Petrosian (1929–1984). 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3
¤f6 4.¥g5 ¥b4!? 5.e5 h6 6.¥d2 ¥xc3 7.¥xc3 ¤e4 8.¥a5 0–0 9.¥d3 ¤c6 10.¥c3
¤xc3 11.bxc3 f6 12.f4 fxe5 13.fxe5 ¤e7 14.¤f3 c5 15.0–0 £a5 16.£e1 ¥d7 17.c4!
£xe1 18.¦fxe1 dxc4 19.¥e4 cxd4 20.¥xb7 ¦ab8 21.¥a6 ¦b4 22.¦ad1
Black has to return the extra pawn. 22...d3! [No winning chance gives 22...¦a4 23.¦xd4!]
23.cxd3 cxd3 24.¦xd3 ¥c6 25.¦d4 ¦xd4 26.¤xd4 ¥d5 Fischer has to protect his
weak pawns. 27.a4? [White narrowly escapes in 27.¥d3! ¥xa2 28.¦a1 ¦d8 29.¦xa2 ¦xd4
30.¦xa7 ¤c6 31.¦a6 ¦xd3 32.¦xc6 ¢f7 33.¦c7+ ¢g6 34.¦e7] 27...¦f4! 28.¦d1 ¤g6
29.¥c8 ¢f7 30.a5 ¤xe5 31.a6 ¦g4 32.¦d2 ¤c4 33.¦f2+ ¢e7 34.¤b5 ¤d6
35.¤xd6 [Or 35.¤xa7 ¦c4 36.¥b7 ¤xb7 37.axb7 ¥xb7] 35...¢xd6 36.¥b7 ¥xb7
37.axb7 ¢c7 38.h3 ¦g5 39.¦b2 ¢b8 40.¢f2 ¦d5 41.¢e3 ¦d7 42.¢e4 ¦xb7
43.¦f2 Petrosian applied the modern strategy wonderfully. 0–1
(103) Petrosian,Tigran - Geller,Efim [D34]

Petrosian Amsterdam 1956 (2), 1929
[JvR]
1.c4 c5 2.g3 ¤c6 3.¥g2 ¤f6 4.¤f3 e6 5.0–0 d5 6.cxd5 exd5 7.d4 ¥e7 8.¤c3 0–0
9.¥f4 cxd4 10.¤xd4 £b6 11.¤xc6 bxc6 12.£c2 ¥e6 13.¥e3 £a5 14.£a4 £xa4
15.¤xa4 ¤d7 Black threatens to advance the backward c-pawn. White prevents the
plan. 16.¦fd1 ¦fc8 17.b3 [More obvious is 17.¦ac1! ] 17...¥a3 18.¥d4 ¥g4 19.¦d2
¦e8 20.e3 ¥f5 21.¥b2 ¥xb2 22.¦xb2 ¤b6?! 23.¤c5! The weak pawn is blockaded.
23...a5 24.¦c1 ¦ec8? Black allows an attack in the center. 25.e4! ¥g6 Exchange
weakens the c-pawn. 26.f4 f6 27.¥h3 ¦cb8 [Petrosian has calculated 27...¦e8?! 28.¥e6+
¥f7 29.¥xf7+ ¢xf7 30.¤b7!] 28.e5 fxe5 29.fxe5 a4 30.bxa4 ¤c4 31.¦xb8+ ¦xb8
32.e6 ¦b1 33.¦xb1 ¥xb1 White's passed pawns seem to have little strength.

34.¥f1! ¤d6 If Black allows the exchange of his knight, he loses at once. [34...¤a5
35.¤b3] 35.a3 ¢f8 36.a5 ¤c8 37.¢f2 ¢e7 38.¢e3 ¢d6 39.¢d4 ¥f5 40.¥e2 ¤a7
White blockades two passed pawns. Petrosian applies the ideas of Nimzowitsch. 41.a6
¥h3 [Bondarevsky analyses 41...¥xe6 42.¤xe6 c5+ 43.¤xc5 ¤c6+ 44.¢e3 ¢xc5 45.a4
White has a decisive advantage.] 42.a4 ¤c8 [Lilienthal investigates 42...g6 43.g4 ¥g2
44.¢e3 ¤c8 45.¢f2 ¥h1 46.¢g1 ¥e4 47.¤xe4+ dxe4 48.¥c4 and the win has been
achieved elegantly.] 43.¤b7+ ¢xe6 44.¢c5 ¢d7 45.¤a5 ¢c7 46.¤xc6 ¤b6 47.¥b5
¤d7+ Black sets a trap in a lost position. 48.¢xd5? Petrosian misses his usual prudence.
[48.¢d4 wins easily.] 48...¥g2+ 49.¢e6 ¥xc6 50.¥xc6 ¢xc6 51.a7 ¤b6? [Correct is
51...¤c5+! 52.¢f7 ¢b7 53.¢xg7 ¤e4 54.¢xh7 ¤d2! 55.h4 ¤e4 The knight will be given for
the two kingside pawns.] 52.a5 ¤a8 53.¢f7?! White loses time. [53.h4! ¢b7 54.¢f7 g5!
55.h5!+-] 53...g5! 54.¢f6 g4 55.¢g5 ¢b7 56.¢xg4 ¤c7 57.¢g5 ¤d5 58.h3!?
[58.¢h6? ¤e3! Draws (Euwe).; 58.g4! ¤e3 59.h3! ¤d1 60.h4! wins more quickly.] 58...¤c3
59.g4 ¤e4+ 60.¢f5 ¤g3+ 61.¢f4 ¤e2+ 62.¢e3 ¤c3 63.g5 ¤d5+ 64.¢e4 ¤e7
65.¢f4 ¤d5+ [Or 65...¤g6+ 66.¢g4 ¤e5+ 67.¢g3! ¤c6 68.h4!] 66.¢f3 ¤e7 67.h4!
¢xa7 68.¢f4 ¤g6+ 69.¢g4 ¤e7 70.h5! ¢a6 71.¢f4 ¢xa5 72.¢e5 ¢b6 73.¢e6
Black lacks one tempo.[73.¢e6 ¤g8 74.¢f7 dominates the knight.] 1–0
(104) Petrosian,Tigran - Bertok,Mario [E85]

Petrosian Bled 1961 (3), 1929
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 d6 3.¤c3 g6 4.e4 ¥g7 5.f3 0–0 6.¥e3 e5 7.¤ge2 ¤c6 8.d5 ¤e7 9.g4
c5 10.h4 ¤d7 11.¤g3 ¦e8 12.¥d3 a6 13.h5 ¤f8 14.£d2 ¥d7 15.a4 ¤c8 16.¢f2 f6
17.a5 ¦e7 18.¦hb1 ¥e8 19.h6 ¥h8 20.¤a4 ¦c7 21.b4 ¥xa4 22.¦xa4 ¤d7 23.b5
¤f8 24.¦a2 ¦f7 25.¦ab2 axb5 26.¦xb5 b6 27.axb6 ¦b7 28.¥f1 ¦xb6 29.¦xb6
¤xb6 30.£b2 ¤a4 31.£c1 ¤d7 32.¦a1 ¤ab6 33.¦xa8 £xa8 34.£c2 ¢f7 35.¤e2
£a4 36.£xa4 ¤xa4 Black has a bishop of the sad figure. 37.¤g3

This move makes the advance of black's g- or f-pawn unfavorable. White starts activity on
the queenside after the consolidation of the kingside. 37...¤db6 38.¥c1 ¤c3 39.¢e1
¢e7 40.¢d2 ¤ca4 41.¢c2 ¤c8 42.¢b3 ¤ab6 43.¥h3! [More natural looks 43.¥d3
but the bishop remains inactive in that case.] 43...¢d7 44.¥d2 ¤e7 Black stops the
intruders easily, although his bishop has no positional value. 45.g5+! This a-positional
move is necessary for strategic reasons. White opens a second front. 45...¢e8 46.¥a5
¤ec8 The knights are needed for the defense of the queenside. 47.¤h1 The plan is to
play and -g4. 47...fxg5 Black complies and activates his bishop. 48.¤f2 ¥f6
49.¥g4 ¥d8 50.¤h3 ¥f6 51.¥d2 ¤e7 52.¤xg5 ¥xg5 The bishop has done its duty.
53.¥xg5 Black can do very little. 53...¢f7 54.¥d2 Petrosian chooses the positional
solution. [The fortress is conquered faster by 54.f4! exf4 55.¥xf4 ¤ec8 56.¥xc8 ¤xc8
57.¢a4] 54...¤ec8 55.¥xc8 ¤xc8 56.¥g5! A counteraction on the kingside is avoided
by consolidation. 56...¤b6 57.¥d8 ¤c8 58.¢a4 ¢e8 59.¥g5 ¢d7 60.¢b5 ¢c7
61.¢a6 ¤b6 62.¥d8+! The exchanges lead to a won pawn ending. 1–0
(105) Petrosian,Tigran - Botvinnik,Mikhail [D94]

Petrosian W Ch Moscow 1963 (4), 1929
[JvR]
Petrosian played Botvinnik for the world championship. He gave lessons in endgame
strategy. 1.c4 g6 2.d4 ¤f6 3.¤c3 d5 4.¤f3 ¥g7 5.e3 0–0 6.¥e2 dxc4 7.¥xc4 c5 8.d5
e6 9.dxe6 £xd1+ 10.¢xd1 ¥xe6 11.¥xe6 fxe6

The endgame has been reached. 12.¢e2 ¤c6 13.¦d1 ¦ad8 [13...h6! achieves a plus.]
14.¦xd8 ¦xd8 Exchange has decreased black's plus by a greater mobility. 15.¤g5 ¦e8
16.¤ge4 ¤xe4 17.¤xe4 b6 18.¦b1 ¤b4 White has made a small success by placing a
knight in the center. 19.¥d2! ¤d5 Black also moves a knight to the center. [19...¤xa2?
20.¦a1 ¤b4 21.¥xb4 cxb4 22.¦xa7 ¥xb2 23.¦b7 favors White (Petrosian).] 20.a4 ¦c8
21.b3 ¥f8 22.¦c1 ¥e7 23.b4! White can start a minority attack by his active pieces.
23...c4 24.b5! ¢f7? Black will lose the c-pawn eventually. [Correct is 24...¥a3 25.¦c2 c3!
26.¥xc3 ¥b4 27.¢d2 ¦c4 28.¥xb4 ¦xe4 29.¥d6 ¦xa4 (Averbakh).] 25.¥c3! The passed
pawn is blockaded. 25...¥a3 26.¦c2 ¤xc3+ 27.¦xc3 ¥b4 28.¦c2 ¢e7 [Better is
28...e5 29.¤d2 c3 30.¤e4 ¢e6 (Tal) 31.¢d3 ¦d8+ 32.¢c4 ¦d2 33.¢b3 ¦xc2 34.¢xc2 ¢d5
35.¤xc3+ ¢c4 36.¤e4 ¥e7 37.g3 ¢b4 38.¢d3 ¢xa4 39.¢c4 White has the advantage of
the central position.] 29.¤d2! c3 30.¤e4 ¥a5 31.¢d3 ¦d8+ 32.¢c4 ¦d1 33.¤xc3
¦h1?! Exchange of minor pieces is better. 34.¤e4! ¦xh2 35.¢d4! The center has been
conquered. 35...¢d7 Absolute control of the seventh rank by the rook has been
prevented. 36.g3 ¥b4 37.¢e5 ¦h5+ 38.¢f6 ¥e7+ 39.¢g7! The central position of the
king has been utilized for an invasion. 39...e5 40.¦c6! ¦h1 41.¢f7 ¦a1 42.¦e6! ¥d8
43.¦d6+ ¢c8 44.¢e8! ¥c7 45.¦c6 ¦d1 [Or 45...¦xa4 46.¤c3 and .] 46.¤g5
¦d8+ 47.¢f7 ¦d7+ 48.¢g8 The first lesson showed the center strategy. 1–0
(106) Botvinnik,Mikhail - Petrosian,Tigran [D31]

[JvR]
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.¤c3 ¥e7 4.cxd5 exd5 5.¥f4 c6 6.e3 ¥f5 7.g4 ¥e6 8.h3 ¤f6
9.¤f3 ¤bd7 10.¥d3 ¤b6 11.£c2 ¤c4 12.¢f1 ¤d6 13.¤d2 £c8 14.¢g2 ¤d7
15.f3 g6 16.¦ac1 ¤b6 17.b3 £d7 18.¤e2 ¤dc8 19.a4 a5 20.¥g3 ¥d6 21.¤f4 ¤e7
22.¤f1 h5 23.¥e2 h4 24.¥h2 g5 25.¤d3 £c7 26.£d2 ¤d7 27.¥g1 ¤g6 28.¥h2
¤e7 29.¥d1 b6 30.¢g1 f6 31.e4 ¥xh2+ 32.£xh2 £xh2+ 33.¦xh2 Black has a plus

because his bishop is more active. 33...¦d8 34.¢f2? [The immediate 34.¦d2 saves two
tempi (see the moves 35 and 37).] 34...¢f7 35.¢e3 ¦he8 36.¦d2 ¢g7 37.¢f2 dxe4
38.fxe4 The center pawns become a target. 38...¤f8 39.¤e1 ¤fg6 [Timman prefers
39...¥f7! followed by .. and .. in order to pressure the center pawns strongly.]
40.¤g2 ¦d7
Euwe already wrote about the vulnerability of two isolated center pawns in the twenties.
Nevertheless Bronstein, Tal, Flohr and Botvinnik evaluated the position as better for White.
41.¥c2! Square e4 is overprotected and square d1 becomes available for the bishop.
41...¥f7! 42.¤fe3 c5! The preparatory move. 43.d5 ¤e5 44.¦f1? A wrong strategic
choice decides the match. [44.¤c4! reacts to the blockade with the same idea. 44...¤xc4
45.bxc4 ¥g6 46.¤e3 ¤c8 47.¤f5+! ¥xf5 48.exf5 ¦de7 White is hopeless (Timman). 49.¥d3
¦e3 50.¦e2= But Black cannot progress.] 44...¥g6 45.¢e1 ¤c8 46.¦df2 ¦f7 47.¢d2
¤d6 Both players have completed their strategy. Botvinnik battles on the half-open file
and Petrosian has blockaded the center. 48.¤f5+ ¥xf5 49.exf5 c4! The knights support
the attack on the queenside. 50.¦b1 b5 51.b4 c3+! An elegant decision. 52.¢xc3 ¦c7+
53.¢d2 ¤ec4+ 54.¢d1 ¤a3 55.¦b2 ¤dc4 56.¦a2 axb4 57.axb5 ¤xb5 58.¦a6
¤c3+ 59.¢c1 ¤xd5 60.¥a4 ¦ec8 61.¤e1 ¤f4 Impressive prophylactic play has
ended the opposition in the second strategic lesson. 0–1
(107) Petrosian,Tigran - Botvinnik,Mikhail [E19]

[JvR]
Both strategic lessons are repeated in the endgame. 1.c4 ¤f6 2.¤c3 e6 3.¤f3 b6 4.g3
¥b7 5.¥g2 ¥e7 6.0–0 0–0 7.d4 ¤e4 8.£c2 ¤xc3 9.£xc3 f5 10.b3 ¥f6 11.¥b2 d6
12.¦ad1 ¤d7 13.¤e1 ¥xg2 14.¤xg2 ¥g5 15.£c2 ¥h6 16.e4 f4 17.¤e1 £e7 18.e5
dxe5 19.dxe5 ¦ad8 20.£e2 £g5 21.¢g2 a5 22.¤f3 £h5 23.¥a3 ¦fe8 24.¦d4 ¤b8
25.¦fd1 ¦xd4 26.¦xd4 fxg3 27.hxg3 £f7 28.£e4 g6 29.£b7 ¥g7 30.c5 bxc5
31.¥xc5 ¤d7 32.£xc7 ¤xe5 33.£xf7+ ¤xf7

Black has two weak pawns. The a-pawn is most vulnerable. 34.¦a4 ¥c3 35.¦c4?!
Petrosian plays too hesitant. [A great battle gives 35.¥d4! ¥xd4 36.¤xd4 e5 37.¤c6 and the
attack on the queenside is decisive.] 35...¥f6 36.¥b6 ¦a8 37.¦a4 ¥c3 38.¥d4 ¥b4
39.a3 ¥d6 40.b4 ¥c7 41.¥c3 ¢f8 So far the strategy has been the struggle for a weak
pawn. 42.b5! White switches to a strategy of restraint. 42...¢e8 [Horrible is 42...¤d6
43.¥b4! ¢e7 44.¥c5 ¦b8 45.¦h4 h5 (45...¦xb5 46.¦xh7+ ¢d8 47.¤d4) 46.a4 and White
attacks on all fronts.] 43.¦c4 ¢d7 44.a4 The protected passed pawn restricts black's
mobility. 44...¦c8 45.¤d2 ¤d6 46.¦d4 ¢e7 47.¦d3 ¤b7?! The control over square e4
is given away. 48.¤e4! e5 49.¥b2 ¥b6 50.¥a3+ ¢e6 51.¤g5+ ¢f5 52.¤xh7 e4
53.g4+?! [Even better is 53.¦d5+ ¢e6 54.¦g5] 53...¢f4! 54.¦d7 ¦c7 55.¦xc7 ¥xc7
56.¤f6 Black has got chances due to the weakening of the g-pawn. 56...¥d8 [56...¥d6
sets a trap. Black draws, if White exchanges. 57.¥c1+! ¢e5 58.¥b2+ ¢f4 59.¥d4 ¥c5
60.¥c3 ¥d6 The win is forced by a combination. 61.¤d5+! ¢xg4 62.¤e3+ ¢f4 63.¤c4]
57.¤d7 ¢xg4 58.b6 ¥g5 [An interesting alternative is 58...¢f5!? 59.¤c5 ¥xb6 60.¤xb7
e3 61.fxe3 ¥xe3 62.¤xa5 Analysts mention drawing chances, but the position is won, if
White avoids the exchange of knights.] 59.¤c5 ¤xc5 60.¥xc5 ¥f4 61.b7 ¥b8 62.¥e3
g5 63.¥d2 ¢f5 64.¢h3! ¥d6 [Similar to the game is 64...g4+ 65.¢h4 ¥a7 66.¥xa5
¥xf2+ 67.¢h5 ¥g3 68.¥b6] 65.¥xa5 g4+ 66.¢g2 Petrosian changed his strategy in order
to achieve victory. 1–0
(108) Korchnoi,Viktor - Livshin,Iosif [D12]

Korchnoi Kiev 1954 (1), 1931
[JvR]
Korchnoi (1931) is one of the greatest fighters in the history of chess. 1.d4 ¤f6 2.¤f3 d5
3.c4 c6 4.e3 ¥f5 5.¥d3 ¥xd3 6.£xd3 e6 7.0–0 ¤e4 8.¤c3 f5 9.cxd5 cxd5 10.¤e5
¤xc3 11.bxc3 ¤c6 12.c4 dxc4 13.¤xc4 b5 14.¤d2 a6 15.a4 ¦b8 16.¥a3 ¥xa3
17.£xa3 ¢f7 18.¦fc1 ¤e7 19.¤f3 ¦e8 20.¤e5+ ¢g8 21.axb5 axb5 22.¦ab1 ¦b7
23.¦c5 £d6 24.¤c4 £b8 25.£a6 ¤d5 26.¦cxb5 ¦xb5 27.¦xb5 £a8 28.£xa8
¦xa8

White has won a pawn. The first aim becomes to stay within the time control. 29.g3 h6
30.h4 g5 31.hxg5 hxg5 32.¢g2 g4 33.¤d6 ¦d8 34.¤c4 ¦a8 35.¦b2 ¦a1 36.¤d2
¦d1 37.¤c4 ¦a1 38.¤e5 ¢g7 39.¦b7+ ¢f6 40.¦f7+ ¢g5 The first goal has been
achieved. 41.¦g7+ ¢f6 42.¦b7!? [The alternative 42.¦g6+ ¢e7 43.e4 fxe4 44.¦xg4 e3
creates a passed pawn, but makes too many exchanges. White sets a new goal: his king
has to become mobile by an exchange of rooks.] 42...¦a2 43.¤d7+ ¢g5 44.¦b3 ¢g6
45.¦d3 ¤b4 46.¦d1 ¤c2 47.¢f1 ¦a1?? White gets his way freely. [Right is 47...¤b4 ]
48.¦xa1 ¤xa1 49.¢e2 A conquest of the center becomes the third goal. 49...¤c2
50.¤e5+ ¢f6 51.¤c6 ¤a3 52.¢d3 ¤b5 53.e4! The thematic advance has been carried
out. 53...fxe4+? The g-pawn will be lost. [53...¤c7 54.e5+! ¢g5 (54...¢f7 55.¢c4 ¢e8
56.¢c5 ¢d7 57.¤b4 leads to zugzwang) 55.¤e7 f4 56.¢e4 fxg3 57.fxg3 ¤e8 58.d5 exd5+
59.¤xd5 ¤g7 60.¤f4 ¤f5 61.¤e2 ¤g7 62.¢d5 ¤f5 63.¢e6 The penetration by the king
secures the win.] 54.¢xe4 ¤c3+ 55.¢f4! ¤d1 56.¤e5 ¢e7 [Black might have missed
56...¤xf2 57.¤xg4+] 57.¤xg4 ¢d6 58.¢e4 ¤c3+ 59.¢d3 ¤b5 60.f4 ¢e7 61.¤e5
¤d6 62.g4 ¢f6 63.¢e3 ¤b5 64.¤c6 ¤c3 65.g5+ ¢g6 66.¢d3 ¤d1 67.¢e4 ¤f2+
68.¢e3 ¤d1+ 69.¢f3 ¤c3 70.¤e5+ ¢f5 71.¤g4 ¢g6 72.¤e3 ¢h5 73.¤f1 ¢g6
74.¤g3 ¢f7 75.¢e3 ¢g6 76.¤e2 ¤d5+ 77.¢e4 ¤e7 78.¤c1 ¤c6 79.¤d3 ¢g7
80.¤c5 ¢f7 The last blow follows. 81.¤xe6! A long struggle has ended. 1–0
(109) Matanovic,Aleksandar - Korchnoi,Viktor [C08]

Korchnoi Wijk aan Zee 1968 (2), 1931
[JvR]
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤d2 c5 4.exd5 exd5 5.¤gf3 a6 6.dxc5 ¥xc5 7.¤b3 ¥a7 8.¥d3
£e7+ 9.£e2 ¤c6 10.0–0 ¥g4 11.h3 ¥h5 12.¥f4 £xe2 13.¥xe2 ¤f6 14.c3 0–0
15.¦fe1 ¦fe8 16.g4 ¥g6 17.¥f1 ¦e4 18.¦xe4 ¥xe4 19.¥g2 h5 20.g5 ¤d7 21.¦d1
¤f8 22.¥e3 ¥xe3 23.fxe3 ¤e6 24.h4 ¦e8 25.¢f2 ¤e7 26.¥h3 ¥c2 27.¦a1 ¤g6
28.¥xe6 fxe6

Black dominates the center. 29.¢g3 e5 30.¤bd2? [White has counter-play in the
variation 30.¤c5 ¤e7 31.¤d7 ¤f5+ 32.¢f2] 30...¤e7 31.¦e1 ¤f5+ 32.¢h3 ¤d6! Black
controls square e4. White has to remain passively. 33.¢g2 ¢f7 34.¤f1 ¢e6 35.¤g3 g6
36.¤d2 ¦f8 37.¦e2 b5 38.¦f2? [The time is ripe for 38.e4 ¦f4 39.exd5+ ¢xd5 40.¤f3 e4
41.¦d2+ ¥d3 42.¤e1 White has fighting chances.] 38...¥f5 39.¢f1 ¦c8 40.¢e1 a5
41.a3 b4! A minority attack is carried out. 42.axb4 axb4 43.¤e2 [The wonderful pointe is
43.cxb4 ¦c1+ 44.¢e2 ¥g4+ 45.¢d3 e4+ 46.¢d4 ¤b5# (Korchnoi).] 43...¦a8 44.¤b3
¤e4 45.¦h2 ¦b8 46.cxb4 ¦xb4 47.¤bc1 ¤d6 [47...¦xb2?? 48.¤d4+] 48.b3?! [Better is
48.¤c3 ] 48...¤e4 49.¤g1 ¤c5 50.¢d1 ¤xb3 The knight maneuver has netted a pawn.
51.¦b2 ¦g4 52.¤ce2 ¤a5 53.¦b6+ ¢e7 54.¤f3 ¤c4 55.¦b7+ ¢e6 56.¢e1 ¥e4
57.¤d2 ¤xd2 58.¦b6+ ¢f7 59.¦b7+ ¢f8 60.¦b8+ ¢e7 61.¦b7+ ¢e8 62.¢xd2
¦xh4 63.¤c3 d4 64.¤xe4 ¦xe4 65.¦g7 ¦xe3 66.¦xg6 The fight for square e4 gave a
great content to the game. 0–1
(110) Korchnoi,Viktor - Karpov,Anatoly [A46]

Korchnoi Candidates' final Moscow 1974 (3), 1931
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.¥g5 e6 3.e4 h6 4.¥xf6 £xf6 5.¤f3 d6 6.¤c3 g6 7.£d2 £e7!? 8.0–0–0
a6 9.h4 ¥g7 10.g3 b5 11.¥h3 b4 12.¤d5 exd5 13.¥xc8 0–0 14.¥b7 ¦a7 15.¥xd5
c6 16.¥b3 £xe4 17.£d3 £xd3 18.¦xd3 ¤d7 19.¦e1 ¤b6 20.a4 bxa3 21.bxa3 a5
22.¦de3 ¥f6 23.a4 c5 24.dxc5 dxc5 25.¤d2 ¢g7 26.¦f3 ¦c7 27.¤c4 ¤xc4
28.¥xc4 ¦d8 29.c3 ¦cd7 30.¢c2 ¦d2+ 31.¢b3 ¦d1 32.¦xd1 ¦xd1 White has the
initiative.

33.¥b5! ¦d5 34.¦e3 ¦e5 35.¦d3 ¦e2 36.¦f3 ¦e5?! [Botvinnik prefers 36...¦d2
37.¢c4 ¦c2! 38.¥c6 ¦c1 39.¥d5 ¦c2 40.¢b5 ¦xc3 41.¢xa5 ¦xf3 42.¥xf3 c4 43.¢b4 c3=]
37.¢c4 ¦f5 38.¦d3 ¦xf2 39.¢xc5 ¥e5 40.¢b6! ¦g2 41.c4 ¦xg3 42.¦d7! g5
43.hxg5 hxg5 44.c5 ¦c3 45.c6 g4 46.c7 g3! 47.¥c6 ¥xc7+ 48.¦xc7 ¢h6 [The
elegant variation 48...¦xc6+! 49.¦xc6 f5 50.¦c1 ¢f6 51.¢xa5 f4 52.¦g1 ¢f5 53.¢b4 ¢g4
54.a5 f3 55.a6 f2 56.¦a1 g2 57.a7 g1£ 58.a8£ £e1+ draws (Konoplava).] 49.¦c8 f5
50.¦f8 Karpov nears a defeat in the difficult endgame. 50...¦xc6+? [The escape brings
50...¢g5! 51.¥a8 f4 52.¢xa5 ¦b3! 53.¥d5 ¦b2 (Botvinnik).] 51.¢xc6 ¢g5 52.¦g8+! ¢f4
The king blocks his pawn. 53.¢b5 ¢f3 54.¢xa5 f4 55.¢b4 ¢g2 [Or 55...g2 56.¢c4!
¢f2 57.¢d4+-] 56.a5 f3 57.a6 f2 58.a7 f1£ 59.a8£+ A check decides the game.
59...£f3 60.£a2+ White has to avoid the exchange of queens. 60...£f2 61.£d5+ £f3
62.£d2+ £f2 63.¢c3 ¢g1 64.£d1+ ¢g2 65.£d3 £c5+ 66.¢b3 £b6+ 67.¢c2
£c6+ 68.¢d2 £h6+ 69.£e3 £h4 70.¦b8 £f6 71.¦b6 £f5 72.¦b2 ¢h2 73.£h6+
¢g1 74.£b6+ ¢h2 75.£b8 ¢h3 76.£h8+ ¢g4 77.¦b4+ ¢f3 78.£h1+ ¢f2
79.¦b2 Karpov would win the final and become world champion. 1–0
(111) Karpov,Anatoly - Korchnoi,Viktor [C82]

Korchnoi W Ch Baguio City 1978 (4), 1931
[JvR]
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 ¤f6 5.0–0 ¤xe4 6.d4 b5 7.¥b3 d5 8.dxe5 ¥e6
9.c3 ¤c5 10.¥c2 ¥g4 11.¦e1 ¥e7 12.¤bd2 £d7 13.¤b3 ¤e6 14.h3 ¥h5 15.¥f5
¤cd8 16.¥e3 a5 17.¥c5 a4 18.¥xe7 £xe7 19.¤bd2 c6 20.b4 ¤g5 21.£e2 g6
22.¥g4 ¥xg4 23.hxg4 ¤de6 24.£e3 h5 25.¤xg5 £xg5 26.£xg5 ¤xg5 27.gxh5
¦xh5 28.¤f1 Korchnoi has the initiative.

28...¦h4 29.¦ad1 ¢e7 30.f3 ¤e6 31.¤e3 ¦d8! Doubling of the rooks on the h-file
will have little effect. 32.¤g4 ¤g5 33.¤e3 ¤e6 34.¤g4 ¤g7 35.¤e3 ¤f5 36.¤c2! If
White exchanges the knight, he will be restricted. 36...¦c4 37.¦d3 d4! Black opens the
position with a temporary sacrifice. 38.g4 ¤g7 39.¤xd4 ¤e6 40.¦ed1 ¤xd4 41.cxd4
¦xb4 42.¢f2 c5! Korchnoi sets a new problem with his sealed move. 43.d5! [The
alternative is 43.¢e3!? ¦dxd4! 44.¦xd4 cxd4+ 45.¦xd4 ¦b2 46.¢e4 a3 47.¦d5!] 43...¦b2+
44.¢g3? Karpov fails with his second move after the adjournment. [The commentators
overlook 44.¦3d2! ¦xd5 45.¦xb2 ¦xd1 46.¦xb5 ¦d2+ 47.¢e3 ¦xa2 48.¦xc5=] 44...¦xa2
45.¦e3 b4 46.e6 ¦a3 47.¦e2 [Langeweg analyses 47.¦xa3 bxa3 48.exf7 ¦b8! 49.¦a1
¦b3 50.¢f4 ¢xf7 51.¢e5 ¢e7! 52.d6+ ¢d7–+] 47...fxe6 48.¦xe6+ ¢f7 49.¦de1 ¦d7!
50.¦b6 ¦d3 51.¦ee6 ¦3xd5 52.¦xg6 a3 53.¦bf6+ ¢e7 54.¦e6+ ¢f8 55.¦ef6+
¢e7 56.¦e6+ ¢d8 57.¦a6 ¦b7 58.¦g8+ ¢c7 59.¦g7+ ¦d7 60.¦g5 b3 61.¦xc5+
¢b8 Korchnoi seemed to be beaten in the match, but he fought back with an energetic
game. The score became 5-3. 0–1
(112) Korchnoi,Viktor - Karpov,Anatoly [D36]

Korchnoi W Ch Baguio City 1978 (5), 1931
[JvR]
1.c4 e6 2.¤c3 d5 3.d4 ¤f6 4.cxd5 exd5 5.¥g5 ¥e7 6.e3 0–0 7.¥d3 ¤bd7 8.¤f3
¦e8 9.£c2 c6 10.0–0 ¤f8 11.¥xf6 ¥xf6 12.b4 ¥g4 13.¤d2 ¦c8 14.¥f5 ¥xf5
15.£xf5 £d7 16.£xd7 ¤xd7 It seems to be drawn, but Korchnoi has just started. 17.a4
¥e7 18.¦fb1 ¤f6 19.a5 a6 20.¤a4 ¥f8 21.¤c5 ¦e7 The minority attack on the
queenside ended. Gaining territory becomes the new aim. 22.¢f1 ¤e8 23.¢e2 ¤d6
24.¢d3 ¦ce8 25.¦e1 g6 26.¦e2 f6 27.¦ae1 ¥h6 28.¤db3 ¥f8 29.¤d2 ¥h6 30.h3
¢f7 31.g4 ¥f8 32.f3 ¦d8 33.¤db3 ¤b5 34.¦f1 ¥h6 35.f4 ¥f8 36.¤d2

[36.f5 creates the strong square e6.] 36...¤d6 37.¦fe1 h6 38.¦f1 ¦b8 39.¦a1 ¦be8
40.¦ae1 ¦b8?! Black allows an advance in the center. 41.e4! dxe4+ 42.¤dxe4 ¤b5
43.¤c3 ¦xe2 44.¦xe2 ¥xc5 45.bxc5 ¦d8 46.¤xb5 axb5 47.f5! The fight for terrain
continues in the rook ending. An adjournment follows. 47...gxf5 48.gxf5 ¦g8! Korchnoi
and his seconds have prepared a surprise. 49.¢c3! [The obvious 49.d5 ¦d8 50.d6 ¦e8
draws quickly.] 49...¦e8 [Korchnoi analyses 49...¦g3+!? 50.¢b4 ¦xh3 51.a6! bxa6 52.d5!
¦h4+! 53.¢a5 cxd5 54.¦c2 d4! 55.c6 d3 56.c7 dxc2 57.c8£ ¦c4 58.£e6+ ¢f8 59.£xf6+
¢e8 60.£e6+ ¢d8 61.£d6+ ¢c8 62.£xa6+ ¢d8 Black narrowly escapes.] 50.¦d2 ¦e4!
51.¢b4 ¢e8 52.a6! bxa6 53.¢a5 ¢d7 54.¢b6! b4 55.d5 cxd5 56.¦xd5+ ¢c8
57.¦d3! Korchnoi investigates this position in his book about rook endings. 57...a5?
Karpov makes a grave error. [Correct is 57...¦c4! 58.c6 ¦c3 59.¦d6!? b3 60.¦xf6 ¢d8
(Korchnoi).] 58.¦g3 b3? [The variation 58...¦c4? 59.c6 ¢d8 60.c7+ ¢e7! 61.¢b7 ¢d6!
draws, according to Timman. However, 62.c8£ ¦xc8 63.¢xc8 wins. See for instance
63...¢c5 64.¢c7 a4 65.¦g6! a3 66.¦xf6 b3 67.¦c6+ ¢d5 68.f6 a2 69.¦d6+! ¢e5 70.f7 a1£
71.f8£ £a7+ 72.¢c6 £a6+ 73.¢d7 £b7+ 74.¢e8 £c8+ 75.¦d8; Best is 58...¦d4! 59.¢xa5
¢c7 60.¢b5 ¦h4! and Black has excellent drawing chances.] 59.¢c6! Karpov has missed
this move. 59...¢b8 [59...¢d8 60.¦xb3 a4 61.¦b8+ ¢e7 62.¦b7+ ¢d8 63.¢d6 ¦d4+
64.¢e6+- (Korchnoi).] 60.¦xb3+ ¢a7 61.¦b7+ ¢a6 62.¦b6+ ¢a7 63.¢b5 a4
64.¦xf6 ¦f4 65.¦xh6 a3 66.¦a6+ ¢b8 67.¦xa3 ¦xf5 68.¦g3 ¦f6 69.¦g8+ ¢c7
70.¦g7+ ¢c8 71.¦h7 Korchnoi won the best endgame of his career. The score had
become 5-5. Anatoly won the next game and kept the title. 1–0
(113) Tal,Mikhail - Taimanov,Mark [B43]

Tal Riga 1958 (1), 1936
[JvR]
Tal (1936–1992) was a fantastic attacker. He played a fine endgame, when his health was
okay. 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 e6 3.¤c3 a6 4.g3 b5 5.d4 cxd4 6.¤xd4 ¥b7 7.¥g2 ¤f6 8.0–0
¥b4 9.e5 ¥xg2 10.¢xg2 ¥xc3 11.bxc3 ¤d5 12.£g4 ¢f8 13.f4 h5 14.£f3 ¤c6
15.f5 ¤xd4 16.cxd4 £c7 17.c4 bxc4 18.¥a3+ ¢g8 19.¥d6 £a7 20.¥c5 £c7
21.¦ac1 £c6 22.¢g1 exf5 23.¦xc4 ¦c8 24.¦fc1 ¤b6 25.£xc6 ¦xc6

Tal has the initiative and the better pawn structure for a pawn. 26.¦b4 Exchanges lead to
equality. 26...¦hh6 Protection and development are combined. 27.¦cb1 ¤d5! [27...¤c8
28.¦b8 is unpleasant for Black.] 28.¦b8+ ¢h7 29.¦1b7 ¦c7 30.¦xc7 ¤xc7 31.¦d8
¤e6 32.¦xd7 ¤xc5 33.dxc5 Black has returned the pawn for exchanges. The second
phase of the endgame consists of a rook ending. White has a passed pawn. 33...¦e6
34.¦d5 f6? [Better is 34...g5 ] 35.exf6 ¦xf6 36.¦d6! Tal has a trick. 36...¢g6 37.¦b6
¢f7 38.¢f2 ¦e6 39.c6 ¦e4 40.¦xa6 f4! White has gained a pawn during the time
pressure. Black is able to exchange pawns and analyses during the adjournment. 41.¦a5
[The tactical justification shows 41.¢f3 fxg3!] 41...fxg3+ 42.hxg3 h4 43.¦c5 hxg3+
44.¢xg3 ¦e8 Black has to make one good move. 45.¢f4 ¦a8? The experienced player
failed to do proper homework [Black can force a draw with 45...g5+! 46.¢f5 (46.¦xg5 ¦c8;
46.¢xg5 ¢e6) 46...g4! 47.¦c3 ¦g8 48.c7 ¦c8=; 45...¢e6? 46.¦e5+ ¢f7 47.¦xe8 ¢xe8
48.¢e5 ¢e7 49.a4 g5 50.a5 g4 51.a6 g3 52.a7 g2 53.a8£ g1£ 54.£b7+ and a theoretical
win.] 46.¢e5 ¢e7 47.¦d5! ¦a7 [The pointe is 47...¦xa2? 48.¦d7+ ¢e8 49.¢d6+-] 48.a4!
g5 49.a5 g4 50.¦b5 g3 51.¦b7+ ¦xb7 52.cxb7 g2 53.b8£ g1£ The third phase is a
queen ending. Black draws according to the modern theory. 54.£c7+ ¢e8 55.£c8+
¢e7 56.£c7+ ¢e8 57.¢d6 £d4+ 58.¢c6 £e4+ 59.¢b6 £b4+? [Correct is the
mysterious 59...£e3+ 60.¢b7 £b3+ 61.¢a8 £f3+] 60.¢a6? £a4? [Right is 60...£a3!
61.¢a7 £e3+ 62.£b6 £c3] 61.¢b7? £b4+? The queen has to move to the third rank.
62.£b6! Suddenly Tal finds the right moves. 62...£e7+ 63.¢c8 £e4 64.£b5+ ¢f8
65.a6 £e6+ 66.¢c7 £e7+ 67.£d7 £c5+ 68.£c6 £e3 69.¢b7 £e7+ 70.¢c8 £e3
71.£f6+ ¢g8 72.£d8+ ¢h7 73.£c7+ ¢h6?? A human error is made. [A long resistance
is offered by 73...¢h8! 74.¢b8 £b3+ 75.£b7 £g3+ 76.¢a8 £g4 77.a7 £c4 78.£b2+ ¢g8
79.£b6 White delivers mate in forty-eight moves.] 74.a7 £e4 75.£b6+! Tal was able to
play long endgames in his early twenties.[White wins quickly in 75.£b6+ ¢g5 (75...¢g7
76.£b7+) 76.£a5+] 1–0

(114) Botvinnik,Mikhail - Tal,Mikhail [E81]

Tal W Ch Moscow 1961 (2), 1936
[JvR]
1.d4 g6 2.e4 ¥g7 3.c4 d6 4.¤c3 ¤f6 5.f3 ¤bd7 6.¥e3 0–0 7.¥d3 e5 8.¤ge2 ¤h5
9.dxe5 dxe5 10.0–0 c6 11.£d2 £e7 12.¦ad1 ¤c5 13.¥b1 ¤e6 14.£e1 ¥f6
15.¢h1 ¤hf4 16.g3 ¤xe2 17.¤xe2 h5 18.£f2 b6 19.f4 exf4 20.gxf4 ¥b7 21.e5 c5+
22.¦d5 ¥g7 23.¢g1 ¤c7 24.¤c3 ¤xd5 25.cxd5 ¦ad8 26.¥e4 ¥a8 27.£g3 b5
28.£f2 £d7 29.¥xc5 ¦fe8 30.£g3 ¦c8 31.b4 ¢h8 32.£f3 a6 33.¢h1 f5 34.exf6
¥xf6 35.¥xg6 £g4 36.£d3 ¦g8 37.¥e4 ¦ce8 38.¥f3 £xf4 39.¤e2 £h4 40.¥f2
£g5 41.¤g3 ¦d8 42.¥e3 £e5 43.¦d1 ¦g4 44.a3 ¥b7 45.¥b6 ¦d7 46.¥e3 ¦h4
47.¤f1 ¦c4 48.¥g2 ¦g7 49.£d2 h4 50.h3 £b2 51.£xb2 ¥xb2 52.¥c5 ¦d7
53.¤e3 ¦c1 54.¦xc1 ¥xc1
Black has a material advantage and threatens the center. 55.¥d4+ ¢g8 56.¤g4 ¥g5
57.¢g1 [Khalifman mentions 57.¥f6 ¥f4 58.¥xh4 ¢f7 and an easy win for Black.]
57...¥xd5! 58.¤e5 ¥xg2! 59.¤xd7 ¥xh3 Black has the pair of bishops and an extra
pawn. 60.¤c5 ¥c8 61.¢f2 ¢h7 62.a4 White has to make exchanges. 62...bxa4
63.¤xa4 ¥f4 64.¢f3 h3 65.¥g1 h2 66.¥xh2 ¥xh2 67.¢e4 ¥d7 68.¤c5 ¥b5
69.¢d5 ¢g6 70.¤e4 ¢f5 71.¤c3 [71.¤d6+ ¥xd6 72.¢xd6 ¢e4 loses immediately.]
71...¥f1 72.¢c5 ¥e5 73.¤b1 ¢e6?! [The preparatory move 73...¥d3! simplifies
matters.] 74.¤d2 ¥d6+ 75.¢b6 ¥g2 [Tal intended to play 75...¢d5?? but noticed the
attack on a bishop (Flohr).] 76.¤b3 [Long resistance is offered by 76.b5! axb5 77.¢xb5
¢d5 78.¢a4] 76...¥xb4 77.¢xa6 ¥f1+ 78.¢b6 ¢d6 79.¤a5 ¥c5+ If the knight
reaches b7, a position of Kling and Horwitz comes into being. They regarded it as drawn
in 1851. More than a century later a win within fifty moves was found. 80.¢b7 ¥e2
81.¤b3 [81.¢b8 ¥b6 82.¤b7+ The journey of the knight to the ideal square fails due to
82...¢d7 83.¢a8 ¢c7 84.¤c5 ¥f3+] 81...¥e3 82.¤a5 ¢c5 83.¢c7 ¥f4+ The knight will
be lost within a few moves. The 'Magician of Riga' became the eighth world champion in
1960. He suffered from poor health during the rematch in 1961. Still he was able to
perform well in some endgames. 0–1

(115) Smyslov,Vasily - Tal,Mikhail [A36]

Tal Moscow 1964 (3), 1936
[JvR]
1.c4 g6 2.¤c3 ¥g7 3.g3 c5 4.¥g2 ¤c6 5.b3 e6 6.¥b2 ¤ge7 7.¤a4 ¥xb2 8.¤xb2
0–0 9.e3 d5 10.¤f3 ¤f5 11.0–0 b6 12.¤a4 ¥b7 13.cxd5 exd5 14.d3 £f6 15.£d2
¦ad8 16.¦fd1 ¦fe8 17.¦ab1 ¤d6 18.¤e1 d4 19.e4 £e7 20.¤c2 f5 21.exf5 ¤e5
22.f4 ¤f3+ 23.¥xf3 ¥xf3 24.¦e1 £e2 25.¦xe2 ¦xe2 26.£xe2 ¥xe2 27.¤b2 gxf5
28.¦e1 ¥h5 29.¤c4 ¤xc4 30.bxc4 ¦e8 31.¢f2 ¦xe1 32.¢xe1
Tal has the better ending against a great expert. 32...¢f8 33.¢d2 [An escape from the
restriction starts with 33.¢f2! a6 34.¤e1! b5 35.¤f3 The knight threatens to go to e5.
35...¥xf3 36.¢xf3 bxc4 37.dxc4 White can stop the entrance of the black king.] 33...¢e7
34.¤e1 a6 35.a4!? a5! Black continues the restraint. [35...¥e8? 36.a5! bxa5 37.¤f3 White
has a defendable position.] 36.¢c2 ¥e8 37.¢b3 ¥c6 38.¢a3 ¢f6 39.¢b3 ¢g6
40.¢a3 ¢h5 The game is adjourned. The tempo ..h7-h6 appears to be important during
the analyses. 41.h3 ¢g6 The king returns after he has forced a weakening. 42.¢b3 ¢g7!
Black loses one tempo. 43.¢a3 ¢f6 44.¢b3 ¥e8! The calculated maneuver. 45.¤g2!?
White avoids the preparation. [Tal has analyzed 45.¤f3 ¥h5 46.¤e5 ¥d1+! Black gives a
check because he has lost a tempo. 47.¢a3 ¢e6 48.¤c6 ¥c2 49.¤e5 h6! This tempo
decides the game. 50.g4 ¥d1 Zugzwang.] 45...¥h5 46.¢c2 ¥e2 47.¤e1 ¥f1 An
opening is forced in the fortress. 48.¤f3 [48.h4 ¥e2 The bishop returns via h5 and e8 to
c6. Thereafter the black king enters through the kingside.] 48...¥xh3 49.¤g5 ¥g2
50.¤xh7+ ¢g7 51.¤g5 ¢g6 52.¢d2 If White protects the a-pawn, the black king
enters. 52...¥c6 53.¢c1 ¥g2 54.¢d2 ¢h5 55.¤e6 ¥c6 56.¤c7 ¢g4 57.¤d5 ¢xg3
58.¤e7 ¥d7! 59.¤d5 ¥xa4 60.¤xb6 ¥e8 61.¤d5 ¢f3 [61...a4! wins easily.] 62.¤c7
¥c6 63.¤e6 a4 64.¤xc5 a3 65.¤b3 a2 66.¢c2 White would like to give his knight for
the pawns d4 and f5. [Or 66.¤xd4+ ¢xf4 67.¤b3 ¥a4 68.¤a1 ¢g3] 66...¢xf4 67.¢b2
¢e3 But the d-pawn gets protection in time. 68.¤a5 ¥e8 69.c5 f4 70.c6 ¥xc6
71.¤xc6 f3 72.¤e5 f2 Smyslov was beaten with his own method: the opponent is
encircled and a hole is created in a fortress. Spassky told me that Tal was proud of this
endgame.[72...f2 73.¤g4+ ¢e2 74.¤xf2 ¢xf2 75.¢xa2 ¢e3 Black wins with his last pawn.]
0–1

(116) Keres,Paul - Portisch,Lajos [C93]

Portisch Moscow 1967 (1), 1937
[JvR]
Portisch (1937) is an accurate positional player. His endgames have an educational value.
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 a6 4.¥a4 ¤f6 5.0–0 ¥e7 6.¦e1 b5 7.¥b3 d6 8.c3 0–0
9.h3 h6 10.d4 ¦e8 11.¤bd2 ¥f8 12.a3 ¥d7 13.¥a2 a5 14.¤f1 a4 15.¤g3 ¤a5
16.¥e3 c6 17.¦c1 ¥e6 18.¥xe6 ¦xe6 19.dxe5 dxe5 20.£xd8 ¦xd8 21.¥b6 ¦a8
22.¥xa5 ¦xa5 23.¦ed1 ¦e8 24.¦d3 ¦aa8 25.¢f1 ¦ab8 26.¤e1 g6 27.¤c2 h5
28.f3 ¦ed8 29.¦cd1 ¦xd3 30.¦xd3 c5 31.¤e2 c4 32.¦d1 ¦b7 33.¤b4 ¦d7 34.¢e1
¦xd1+ 35.¢xd1 Black controls more territory. 35...¥c5 36.¤c6 ¤d7 37.f4? Keres
weakens his kingside. 37...f6 38.fxe5 fxe5 39.¤g3 ¢f7 40.¢e2 ¢e6 41.¤f1 ¥f8
42.¤e3 ¢d6 43.¤b4 ¤c5 44.¢f3 ¥h6 45.h4!? ¤d3?!
[Even stronger is 45...¤b3! 46.¢e2 ¥f4 47.¤a6 ¥g3] 46.¤d1 ¥c1 47.¢e2! Keres has set a
wonderful trap. 47...¤c5! [47...¤xb2? 48.¤xb2 ¥xb2 49.¢d2 ¥xa3 50.¢c2 ¥xb4 51.cxb4
White has a foirtress in the pawn ending.] 48.¢f3 g5 49.hxg5 ¥xg5 50.¤a2 ¢e6
51.¤f2 ¢f6 52.¤d1 ¤d3 53.g3 ¢g6 54.¢g2 ¥d2 55.¢f3 ¢g5 56.¢e2 ¥e1
57.¢f3 ¥d2 58.¢e2 ¥e1 59.¢f3 ¢f6 60.¢g2 [White wins elegantly in 60.¤b4 ¤xb4
61.cxb4 ¥d2! 62.¢e2 ¥c1! 63.¤c3 ¥xb2 64.¤xb5 ¢g5 (Barcza).] 60...¢g6 [Better is
60...¤c5! 61.¢f3 ¤e6 62.g4 h4] 61.¢f3 ¢g5 62.¢g2 h4 63.gxh4+ ¢f4? [Black makes
slow progress in 63...¥xh4 64.¢f3 ¤e1+ 65.¢e3 ¢g4] 64.h5 ¢xe4 65.h6 ¤f4+ 66.¢f1
¥h4 67.¤b4 ¥f6 68.¢e1 ¢f3 69.h7 ¥g7 Black has a big advantage but the h-pawn
hinders him. 70.¤c2? [70.¤c6! ¤d3+ 71.¢d2 The e-pawn is stopped at the third rank. It is
dangerous to conquer the h-pawn, because the active knight on c6 will attack pawns on
the queenside. That knight also threatens to support the passed pawn.] 70...¤d5! 71.¢d2
¤f6 72.¤e1+ ¢e4 73.¤f2+ ¢f5 74.¤g2 ¤xh7 Black has won a pawn and finishes the
game. 75.¤e3+ ¢e6 76.¤e4 ¥h6 77.¢e2 ¥xe3! 78.¢xe3 ¤f6 79.¤g5+ ¢d5
80.¢f3 ¤h5 81.¤e4 ¤f4 82.¤f6+ ¢c6 83.¢e4 ¤d3 84.¤g4 ¢d6 85.¤h6 ¤xb2!
86.¤f7+ ¢c5 87.¤xe5 ¤d1 88.¤d7+ ¢d6 89.¢d4 ¤xc3 Normally foreigners were
crushed in Moscow, but Portisch competed on an equal level. He won a great endgame of
Keres. 0–1

(117) Hort,Vlastimil - Portisch,Lajos [E14]

Portisch Wijk aan Zee 1975 (2), 1937
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 c5 4.e3 b6 5.¥e2 ¥b7 6.0–0 ¥e7 7.¤c3 cxd4 8.¤xd4 0–0
9.b3 ¤a6 10.¥f3 £b8 11.¥xb7 £xb7 12.£f3 £xf3 13.gxf3 ¦fc8 14.¥b2 ¤c7
15.¦ac1 a6 16.¦fd1 ¢f8 17.¦d2 ¤ce8 18.¢f1 ¦c7 19.¦cd1 ¦ac8 20.¤de2 d6
21.f4 ¦b7 22.¤d4 g6 23.¢e2 ¤g7 24.¦c1 ¤f5 25.¤xf5 gxf5 26.¤b1 ¦c6 27.¦dc2
¦bc7 28.¢d3 ¤d7 29.f3 ¤c5+ 30.¢e2 ¤d7 31.¢d3 ¦c8 32.¤d2 ¥f6 33.¥xf6
¤xf6 The chances are equal. 34.¦g1 ¢e7 35.a3 ¦6c7 36.¢c3? [36.b4 b5 37.¦gc1 is
okay.] 36...d5! 37.¢b2!? ¦d8 38.cxd5 ¦xc2+ 39.¢xc2 ¤xd5 40.¦e1 ¦c8+ 41.¢d3
¦d8 Hort has prepared a strange move. 42.¤c4?? [Correct is 42.¢c2 b5 43.¦e2 and White
has a stubborn defence.] 42...¤xf4+ 43.¢c2 b5 44.¤e5 [The pointe is 44.exf4 bxc4
45.bxc4 ¦d4 and Black also wins a pawn.] 44...¦c8+ 45.¢d2 ¤d5 46.e4 fxe4 47.fxe4
¤b6 48.¤d3 ¤d7 49.¦e3 ¤f6 50.¤f2 ¦g8 51.¦h3 ¦g7 52.¦h4 a5 53.¤d3 ¦g2+
54.¢c3 ¦e2 55.¢d4 ¦a2 56.¢c3 ¢f8 Black does not capture the poisoned pawn.
57.¤c5 ¢e7
[Timman prefers 57...h5 58.a4 bxa4 59.¤xa4 ¢g7] 58.a4 bxa4 59.¤xa4 ¦g2 60.¢d4
¦g4 Portisch exchanges the rooks. Otherwise he will not make progress. 61.¦xg4 ¤xg4
62.h3 ¤f2 63.h4 ¢d6 64.¤b2 ¢c6 65.¢e3 ¤g4+ 66.¢f4 ¤f6 67.¤c4 ¢b5 68.¤e5
¤e8! [Not 68...¢b4? 69.¤c6+] 69.¢g5 White has a difficult position. [I analyse after
Timman and Varnusz 69.¤xf7 ¢b4 70.¤d8 ¢xb3 71.¤b7! (71.¤xe6 ¢c4! 72.¢e3 a4 73.¤d4
a3 74.¤c2 a2) 71...a4 72.¤c5+ ¢b4 73.¤xa4? ¢xa4 74.¢e5 ¤c7! 75.¢f6 (75.¢d6 ¢b5
76.¢xc7 ¢c5) 75...¢b4 76.¢g7 h5 77.¢g6 ¢c4 78.¢xh5 ¢d4 79.¢g6 ¢xe4 80.h5 e5 81.h6
¤e6 82.¢f6 ¤f8 83.¢f7 ¢f5!! Black wins with his last pawn in the critical variation.]
69...¤d6! Black avoids a trap. [69...f6+? 70.¢h6 fxe5 71.¢xh7 ¢b4 72.¢g6! draws.]
70.¢h6 f5! 71.¢xh7 fxe4 72.¢g6 ¢b4 73.¢f6 [The last trap is 73.¤c6+ Black answers
73...¢c3!] 73...¤f5 74.h5 e3 75.¢xe6 ¤g7+ 76.¢d5 ¤xh5 77.¢d4 ¢xb3 78.¢xe3
Black has to play the knight game accurately. 78...¢c3! 79.¤c6 a4 80.¤a7 ¤f6
81.¤b5+ ¢b4 82.¤d4 ¢c4 83.¤c2 ¢c3 84.¤d4 ¤d5+ 85.¢e4 ¤c7! The influence
of the white knight is restricted. 86.¤e2+ ¢d2 This game would decide about the first
place in the tournament. 0–1

(118) Salov,Valery - Portisch,Lajos [A11]

Portisch Skelleftea 1989 (3), 1937
[JvR]
1.¤f3 ¤f6 2.g3 d5 3.¥g2 c6 4.0–0 ¥g4 5.c4 e6 6.cxd5 exd5 7.d3 ¤bd7 8.¥f4 ¥e7
9.¤c3 0–0 10.h3 ¥xf3 11.¥xf3 ¤c5 12.d4 ¤e6 13.¥e3 ¤e8 14.£d3 ¤d6 15.¦ad1
¥f6 16.b3 ¦e8 17.¥g4 g6 18.h4 h5 19.¥h3 ¥g7 20.¢h2 £f6 21.f3 ¤f5 22.¥xf5
£xf5 23.£xf5 gxf5 White has the better pawn structure. 24.¥f2 ¤f8 25.¦d2 ¦e7
26.¢g2 ¦ae8 27.¦fd1 ¤g6 28.¦c2 ¥f6 29.¦h1 ¦e6 30.¢f1 ¢g7 31.¤a4 ¦6e7
32.¤c5 ¤f8 33.¤d3 ¤e6 34.e3 ¢h7 35.¢g2 ¥g7 36.¦b1 ¥h6 37.¦d1 ¤c7
38.¤f4 ¥xf4 39.gxf4 Both parties have a doubled pawn. 39...¤b5 40.a4 ¤d6 41.¦c3
¦g8+ 42.¢h3 ¦e6 43.¦g1 ¦xg1 44.¥xg1 ¦g6 45.¥f2 ¢g8 46.¦c1 ¢f8 47.¥e1
¢e8 48.¥b4 ¢d7 49.¢h2 ¤e8 50.¥c5 b6 51.¥b4 a5 52.¥d2 ¤c7 53.¥e1 ¤a6
54.¥d2 ¤b4 55.¦c3 ¢d6 56.¦c1 ¦g8 57.¦c3? [Correct is 57.¦g1 ] 57...c5 58.¦c1
¤c6 59.dxc5+ bxc5 60.¦c3 [It is too late for 60.¦g1 due to 60...¦b8! 61.¦b1 c4] 60...f6
61.¥c1 d4 62.exd4 ¤xd4 63.¥a3 ¤e6 64.¦d3+ ¢c6 65.¥c1 ¤d4 66.¥b2 ¢d5
67.¦e3 ¦b8 68.¢g2 ¦b6
[68...¤xb3 69.¥xf6 ¤d4 70.¦e5+ allows counter-play to White.] 69.¢f2 ¦e6 70.¦xe6
¢xe6 71.¢e3 ¢d5 72.¢d3 [72.¥xd4 cxd4+ 73.¢d2 ¢c5 74.¢d3 ¢b4 Black wins the
pawn ending.] 72...¤xb3 73.¥xf6 c4+ 74.¢e3 ¤c5 75.¥c3 ¤xa4 76.¥xa5 White
loses the bishop versus knight ending. 76...¤c5! 77.¥b4 ¤b3 The march of the black
king to the queenside has been prepared. 78.¥e7 ¢c6 79.¥f6 ¢b5 80.¢e2 ¢b4
81.¢d1 ¢c5 82.¢e2 ¤d4+ 83.¢e3 ¤e6 The knight has prepared another king
maneuver. 84.¥e7+ ¢b5 85.¢d2 White gives an unimportant pawn. [The passive
85.¥d6 ¢a4 86.¢d2 ¢b3 87.¥e5 ¤f8 88.¥f6 ¤g6 89.¥g5 c3+ also loses.] 85...¤xf4
86.¥d6 ¤g6 87.¥g3 f4 88.¥e1 ¢c5 89.¥f2+ ¢b4 90.¥e1 ¢b3 91.¢e2 ¢c2 White
has no defence against the threats. Portisch showed more patience than Salov in this
endgame. 0–1

(119) Gligoric,Svetozar - Spassky,Boris [C64]

Spassky Amsterdam 1964 (1), 1937
[JvR]
Spassky (1937) plays the middle game brilliantly and the endgame solidly. 1.e4 e5 2.¤f3
¤c6 3.¥b5 ¥c5 4.c3 f5 5.d4 fxe4 6.dxc5 exf3 7.£xf3 £e7 8.£h5+ g6 9.£e2 d6
10.0–0 ¤f6 11.¥g5 0–0 12.¤d2 d5 13.¥xc6 bxc6 14.¤f3 e4 15.¤d4 £xc5 16.f3 a5
17.£f2 £d6 18.fxe4 ¤xe4 19.£xf8+ £xf8 20.¦xf8+ ¢xf8 Black has an extra pawn
temporarily. 21.¦f1+ ¢g7 22.¥f4 ¥d7! [The initiative shift to White in 22...c5 23.¥e5+]
23.¥xc7 a4 24.a3? Pawn b2 becomes a weakness. [Bondarevsky proposes 24.¤c2 as
prevention of ..a3; more aggressive is 24.¤f3! ¦f8 (the pointe is 24...a3 25.b4! ¤xc3??
26.¥e5+) 25.¤e5 ¦xf1+ 26.¢xf1 ¥e8 with equality.] 24...c5 The restriction begins. 25.¤f3
¥b5! 26.¦d1 ¥c4 The bishop blockades the c-pawn and fixes the b-pawn. 27.¥f4?!
[Analysts prefer 27.¤e5 ; More aggressive is 27.¤d2! ¥e2 28.¦e1 ¥d3 29.¤xe4 dxe4
30.¢f2 The dominant knight has been exchanged.] 27...¢f6 28.h4?! [Bondorevsky
proposes 28.¤d2 White misses the last opportunity to play this move.] 28...¢f5 29.¥c1
¦b8
When we look at the start of the endgame, Black has kept the control over the center.
Furthermore, his bishop, king and rook have improved positions. White has to remain
passively. 30.¦e1 h6 31.¤h2 h5 32.¤f3 ¦b7 It is hard for Black to strengthen his
position. 33.¤g5? [Better is the passive 33.¢h2 ] 33...¤xg5 34.hxg5 The bishops of
opposite colors hardly are a disadvantage for the attacker, when rooks remain on the
board and restraint increases. This was shown by Nimzowitsch. 34...d4! Black creates a
passed pawn. 35.cxd4 cxd4 36.¢f2 ¦f7 37.¢g3 ¦b7 Spassky hesitates again. 38.¦e8?!
The provocation is accepted for the second time. [38.¢f2 gives a proper answer.]
38...¥e6! The rook is cut off. 39.¢f3 ¥d5+ 40.¢f2 ¦c7! 41.¥d2 ¦c2 42.¢e2 ¥c4+
43.¢d1 ¦xb2 The rest is simple. 44.¦f8+ ¢e4 45.¦f4+ ¢d5 46.¦f6 ¥d3 47.g3 ¦a2
48.¥c1 ¥f5 49.¦b6 ¦g2 50.¥f4 ¢e4 51.¥d6 d3 52.¦b4+ ¢d5 53.¥f4 ¥g4+
54.¢c1 ¦c2+ 55.¢b1 ¥f5 56.¦b5+ ¢e4 57.¥d6 ¢f3 Amsterdam 1964 has been
Spassky';s hardest tournament. He had to win a lot and play endgames to the bitter end. 0–
1

(120) Spassky,Boris - Petrosian,Tigran [C11]

Spassky W Ch Moscow 1966 (2), 1937
[JvR]
1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 ¤f6 4.e5 ¤fd7 5.¤f3 c5 6.dxc5 ¤c6 7.¥f4 ¥xc5 8.¥d3 f6
9.exf6 ¤xf6 10.0–0 0–0 11.¤e5 ¥d7 12.¤xc6 ¥xc6 13.£e2 £e7 14.¦ae1 ¦ae8
15.¥g3 a6 16.a3 £f7 17.b4 ¥d4 18.¥e5 ¥xe5 19.£xe5 ¤d7 20.£g3 e5 21.f3 £f4
22.£xf4 ¦xf4 White has a plus due to the hanging pawns in the center. He wants to lure
a pawn forwards in order to blockade the center. 23.¦f2 g6 24.¦d2 ¤b6 25.¦de2
¤d7?! [White exerts pressure on the center pawns. Black should counter by 25...¤c4 ]
26.¤d1 b5 27.c3 ¦f7?!
Spassky refuses the offer of a draw. 28.¥c2 ¢g7 29.¥b3 h5 Square g4 becomes
inaccessible for the knight. 30.¤e3 ¤b6 31.¤c2 ¤d7!? 32.¦e3! h4 33.h3 ¦f6 34.¤d4
¥b7 35.a4 ¦d8 36.¤e2 bxa4 37.¥xa4 ¤b6 38.¥b3 e4? [The weakening is avoided
by 38...¦f5! ] 39.¤d4 ¢h6 40.¦d1 ¦c8 White's win is hard to achieve. 41.fxe4! dxe4
42.¤e6? [The knight maneuver should be prepared by 42.¦a1 and Ra5.] 42...¤c4?
[Analysts regard 42...a5! 43.¦d6! as won for White, but 43...a4! 44.¥a2 ¤c4 45.¥xc4 ¦xc4
46.¤d8 ¦xd6 47.¤f7+ ¢h5 48.¤xd6 ¦c7 49.¤xb7 ¦xb7 50.¦xe4 ¦c7 51.c4 a3 52.c5 a2
53.¦e1 ¦b7 54.¦a1 ¦xb4 55.¦xa2 ¦c4 draws.] 43.¥xc4 ¦xc4 44.¤c5 ¦f7 45.¦a1 ¢g5
46.¦a5! [46.¤xa6 ¥xa6 47.¦xa6 ¦d7 and Black survives (Bondarevsky).] 46...¢f4
47.¢f2 ¥d5 48.¤b3! [Spassky does not allow the simplification by 48.¦xa6 g5 49.¦a5
g4] 48...¢e5+ 49.¢e2 ¦c6 50.¤d2 ¢e6 [The pointe is 50...¦f4? 51.c4!] 51.¤xe4 ¥c4+
52.¢d2 ¦d7+ 53.¢c2 ¢f7 54.¦e5 ¢g7 55.¤d2 ¥b5 56.¤f3 ¥a4+ 57.¢b2 ¦d1
58.¦5e4 ¦f1 59.¦e1 ¦xe1 60.¦xe1 ¦f6 61.¦e4 g5 62.¤xg5 ¦f2+ 63.¢a3 ¥c6
64.¦xh4 ¥xg2 65.¤e4 ¦e2 66.¤c5 ¥f1 67.¦f4 ¦e1 68.h4 Spassky had beaten
Petrosian in the endgame. Boris would do even better in their next match and become the
tenth world champion. 1–0

(121) Spassky,Boris - Byrne,Robert [B52]

Spassky San Juan 1974 (3), 1937
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.¥b5+ ¥d7 4.¥xd7+ £xd7 5.c4 e5 6.¤c3 ¤c6 7.d3 g6 8.a3 ¥g7
9.¦b1 ¤ge7 10.b4 b6 11.0–0 0–0 12.¤d5 ¤xd5 13.cxd5 ¤d4 14.¤xd4 cxd4
15.¥d2 ¦ac8 16.£b3 ¦c7 17.¦bc1 ¦fc8 18.b5 ¦xc1 19.¦xc1 ¦xc1+ 20.¥xc1 £c7
21.£c4 £xc4 22.dxc4
White has little advantage, despite the strong bishop. 22...f6 Black chooses for a passive
defense. [He could play 22...f5 because 23.exf5 gxf5 24.¥g5 ¢f7 25.¥d8 e4 endangers
White.] 23.¢f1 ¥f8 24.a4 ¥e7 25.¢e2 ¢f7 26.¥d2 f5 Suddenly Black changes his
strategy. He wants to force the draw. It favors White. 27.exf5 gxf5 28.¢d3 ¥f6 29.f3 h5
30.a5 ¢e8 31.a6 ¢d7 32.g3 ¢c7 33.h3 ¢d7 34.¥a5 ¢c8 35.¥e1 ¢d7 36.¥f2 ¢e8
37.¥e1 ¢f7? [The retreat 37...¢d7! is correct. 38.¥d2 (The introduction 38.¥a5! ¥d8
39.¥d2 wins a tempo. 39...¥f6 40.g4 hxg4 41.hxg4 e4+! (41...fxg4? 42.fxg4 and the white
king cannot be stopped) 42.fxe4 fxg4 43.¥f4 ¥e5 44.¥xe5 dxe5 45.c5 g3 46.cxb6 g2
47.bxa7 g1£ 48.a8£ £e3+ 49.¢c2 Black delivers perpetual check) 38...¢e8! 39.g4 hxg4
40.hxg4 fxg4! (40...e4+? 41.fxe4 fxg4 42.¥f4 ¥e5 43.¥xe5 dxe5 44.c5! A white pawn will
queen with check) 41.fxg4 ¢f7 42.¢e4 ¢g6 The white king is stopped. These two
variations can be seen as twins. A move is correct in one case and is refuted in the other.]
38.¥b4 ¥e7 39.f4 White threatens to break through with 40.fxe5 dxe5 41.Bxe7 Kxe7
42.c5! 39...exf4 40.gxf4 ¢e8 41.¢xd4 ¢d7 42.¢d3 ¢c7 The game is adjourned.
Spassky and Bondarevsky find the win one hour before the resumption. 43.¢e3 ¥f6
44.¢f3 h4 Black can postpone this weakening by two moves. [44...¥g7 45.¢g3 ¥f6
46.¥a3 (zugzwang) 46...h4+ leads to the game (Kavalek).(46...¢d7 47.c5; 46...¥g7 47.¢h4;
46...¥e7 47.¥b2 ¢d7 48.¥g7 and Bh6-g5) ] 45.¢e3 ¥g7 46.¢d3 ¥f6 47.¥d2 ¢d7
48.¥e3 ¢c7 49.¥f2! Black suffers from zugzwang. 49...¢c8 The intended position has
been reached. 50.c5!! dxc5 [The alternative is 50...bxc5 51.¥e1 (Belyavsky and
Mikhalchiskin).] 51.d6! ¢d7 52.¥xc5! ¥d8 53.¥b4 ¢e6 54.¢c4 ¥f6 55.¥c5 ¥d8
56.¥d4 ¢xd6 57.¥e5+ ¢e6 58.¥b8 ¢d7 59.¢d5 The fortress has collapsed. 1–0

(122) Taimanov,Mark - Fischer,Bobby [E51]

Fischer Buenos Aires 1960 (1), 1943
[JvR]
Robert James Fischer (1943) played a nearly perfect endgame. Chess was the goal of his
life. 1.c4 ¤f6 2.¤c3 e6 3.d4 ¥b4 4.e3 0–0 5.¥d3 d5 6.¤f3 ¤c6 7.0–0 dxc4 8.¥xc4
¥d6 9.¤b5 ¥e7 10.h3 a6 11.¤c3 ¥d6 12.e4 e5 13.¥e3 exd4 14.¤xd4 ¥d7
15.¦e1 £e7 16.¥g5 ¤xd4 17.¤d5 £e5 18.f4 ¤f3+ 19.£xf3 £d4+ 20.¢h1 ¤g4
21.hxg4 £xc4 22.b3 £b5 23.a4 £a5 24.¦ed1 ¥c6 25.e5 ¥b4 26.£e4 ¥xd5
27.¦xd5 £b6 28.f5 ¥c3 29.¦c1 ¥b2 30.¦b1 ¥c3 31.¦c1 ¥b2 32.¦c4 ¦ae8 33.f6
c6 34.fxg7 cxd5 35.gxf8£+ ¢xf8 36.£xh7 ¥xe5 37.¦f4 £e6 38.¦f1 b5 39.axb5
axb5 40.¥d2 ¢e7 41.¥b4+ ¢d8 42.¦xf7 ¦h8 43.¦f8+ ¦xf8 44.¥xf8 £f6 45.¥c5
d4 46.¢g1 £f4 47.£e7+ ¢c8 48.£f8+ £xf8 49.¥xf8
Black's future looks dark due to the distant doubled passed pawns. 49...¥g3! 50.¢f1 d3
The white king has been imprisoned with minimal means. 51.¥b4 ¢d7 52.¥e1 ¥f4
53.¥c3 ¥g3 54.g5 ¢e6 55.g6 ¢e7 56.¥e1 ¥f4 57.¥h4+ ¢f8 58.g3 Sacrifice of part
of the doubled pawns liberates the king. 58...¥d6 59.¢f2 ¥c5+ 60.¢f3 ¢g7 61.¥g5
¢xg6 62.¥f4 ¢h5! [62...¢f5? 63.g4+ ¢e6 64.¢e4 Black loses the d-pawn without
compensation.] 63.¢e4 [63.g4+ ¢h4! 64.g5 ¢h5 65.¢e4 and the endgame continues
similar to the game.] 63...¢g4 64.¢xd3 ¢f3 Pressure on the g-pawn gives
compensation for the lost d-pawn. 65.¥c7 ¥f2 66.¥d6 ¥e1 Penetration by the white
king cannot be stopped. 67.¢d4 ¢g4 68.¢c5 b4 69.¢b5 ¢f5 70.¢c4 ¢e6 71.¥c7
¢f5 72.¢d3 ¢g4 73.¥d6 ¥c3 74.¢c4 ¥e1 75.¥xb4 ¥xg3 Naturally Black should
try to give his bishop for the pawn. 76.¥c3 ¥d6 77.¢d5 ¥e7 78.¥d4 ¥b4 79.¢c4
¥a5 80.¥c3 ¥d8 81.b4 ¢f4 [81...¢f5 82.¢d5 leads to a position known from the game
Capablanca-Janowski, New York 1916. Black resigned due to 82...¥c7? (he missed
82...¢f4! ) 83.¥d4 ¥d8 84.¥c5 ¥c7 85.¥d6 ¥d8 86.¢c6 ¢e6 87.b5 ¥a5 88.¥c7 ¥d2 89.b6
¥e3 90.b7 ¥a7 91.¢b5 ¢d7 92.¢a6 and White wins.] 82.b5 ¢e4 83.¥d4 ¥c7 84.¢c5
¢d3 85.¢c6 ¢c4! The pawn has to be attacked from behind. Averbakh published this
discovery in 1954. Fischer has read the analyses and played the last fifteen moves within a
minute, like a chess machine. 86.¥b6 ¥f4 87.¥a7 ¥c7 ½–½

(123) Fischer,Bobby - Reshevsky,Samuel [B90]

Fischer New York 1962 (2), 1943
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6 6.h3 g6 7.g4 ¥g7 8.g5 ¤h5
9.¥e2 e5 10.¤b3 ¤f4 11.¤d5 ¤xd5 12.£xd5 ¤c6 13.¥g4 ¥xg4 14.hxg4 £c8
15.£d1 ¤d4 16.c3 ¤xb3 17.axb3 £e6 18.¦a5 f6 19.£d5 £xd5 20.¦xd5 ¢d7
21.gxf6 ¥xf6 White blockades a weak pawn. 22.g5! Another weakling is fixed. The
weakening of the g-pawn bears no importance because it can only be attacked by a
bishop. 22...¥e7 23.¢e2 ¦af8 24.¥e3 ¦c8 25.b4 b5? The a-pawn becomes the third
backward pawn. This error becomes fatal. 26.¦dd1 ¢e6 27.¦a1 ¦c6 28.¦h3 ¥f8
29.¦ah1 ¦c7 Black protects the h-pawn in time. 30.¦h4!
The restriction has led to zugzwang. If the king, king's rook or bishop moves, the h-pawn
is lost. If the queen's rook moves on the seventh rank, White wins the a-pawn with
31.Ra1. 30...d5 [30...¦c4 31.f3 ¦c7 32.¢f2 d5 makes a difference two moves.] 31.¦a1!!
¦c6 32.exd5+ ¢xd5 33.¦d1+ ¢e6 34.¦d8 ¢f5 [34...¥g7 costs a pawn, because the
queen's rook has been lured from c7 to c6.] 35.¦a8 ¦e6 36.¦h3 The threat on the f-file
decides the game. 36...¥g7 [36...¢g4 37.¦g3+ ¢h5 38.¦f3 ¥g7 39.¦xh8 ¥xh8 40.¦f8
¥g7 41.¦f7 and the h-pawn falls too (Fischer).] 37.¦xh8 ¥xh8 38.¦xh7 ¦e8 39.¦f7+
¢g4?! 40.f3+ ¢g3 41.¢d3?! [41.¢f1 threatens 42.Bf2+ and 43.Rh7#.] 41...e4+ 42.fxe4
¦d8+ 43.¥d4 ¢g4 44.¦f1 ¥e5 45.¢e3 ¥c7 46.¦g1+ ¢h4 47.¢f3 ¦d7 48.e5 ¦f7+
49.¢e4 ¦f5 50.e6 ¥d8 51.¥f6 ¥xf6 52.gxf6 ¦xf6 53.¢d5 ¦f2 54.¦e1 The
alterations of attacks on weak pawns are carried out with brilliant maneuvers over the
whole board. 1–0

(124) Fischer,Bobby - Taimanov,Mark [B47]

Fischer Quarter final Vancouver 1971 (3), 1943
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 £c7 5.¤c3 e6 6.g3 a6 7.¥g2 ¤f6 8.0–0
¤xd4 9.£xd4 ¥c5 10.¥f4 d6 11.£d2 h6 12.¦ad1 e5 13.¥e3 ¥g4 14.¥xc5 dxc5
15.f3 ¥e6 16.f4 ¦d8 17.¤d5 ¥xd5 18.exd5 e4 19.¦fe1 ¦xd5 20.¦xe4+ ¢d8
21.£e2 ¦xd1+ 22.£xd1+ £d7 23.£xd7+ ¢xd7 The mobility of his pieces gives
White a plus. 24.¦e5 b6?
[Black ends the pressure with 24...¢d6! 25.a4! a5 26.b3 b6 and he gets the time for ..Re8
(Radulescu).] 25.¥f1 a5 26.¥c4 ¦f8 The activity of the rook has been restricted. 27.¢g2
¢d6 [27...¢c6 28.a4 ¦d8 29.¦e2 ¦d4 30.b3 ¤d5 31.¢f3 ¢d7 32.¦e5 ¢c6 33.¦e8] 28.¢f3
¤d7 29.¦e3 ¤b8 30.¦d3+ ¢c7 31.c3 ¤c6 32.¦e3 ¢d6 33.a4! White has restricted
the queenside. Square b5 becomes a stronghold for the bishop. 33...¤e7 34.h3 ¤c6
35.h4! White threatens to advance his pawns on the kingside. 35...h5 The action is
prevented at a high prize. 36.¦d3+ ¢c7 37.¦d5 f5 Another pawn has been fixed on a
white square, but the black rook is liberated. 38.¦d2 ¦f6 39.¦e2 ¢d7 40.¦e3 g6
41.¥b5 ¦d6 The game is adjourned. 42.¢e2 ¢d8?! [Or 42...¦f6 43.¢d3 ¦d6+ 44.¢c4
¦f6 45.¦e1 ¦d6 46.¦e2! ¦f6 47.¦e3 ¦d6 48.¦d3 and the exchange has been forced.]
43.¦d3! ¢c7 44.¦xd6 ¢xd6 45.¢d3 The king penetrates. 45...¤e7 46.¥e8 ¢d5
47.¥f7+ ¢d6 48.¢c4 ¢c6 49.¥e8+ ¢b7 50.¢b5 ¤c8! The restriction is not fatal
right away because Black threatens mate in one. 51.¥c6+ ¢c7 52.¥d5 ¤e7 53.¥f7!
¢b7 54.¥b3! ¢a7! Black stands with his back against the wall. 55.¥d1 ¢b7 56.¥f3+
¢c7 57.¢a6 ¤c8 58.¥d5! ¤e7 59.¥c4! ¤c6 60.¥f7 ¤e7 61.¥e8 ¢d8 Black seems
to escape, but Fischer finds a great finish. 62.¥xg6! ¤xg6 63.¢xb6 ¢d7 [Or 63...¤f8
64.¢xc5 ¤d7+ 65.¢d6] 64.¢xc5 ¤e7 65.b4! axb4 66.cxb4 ¤c8 67.a5 ¤d6 68.b5
¤e4+ 69.¢b6 ¢c8 [After 69...¤d6 70.a6 ¤c8+ 71.¢c5 White wins on the kingside.]
70.¢c6 ¢b8 71.b6 Taimanov played the role of 'Dr. Watson' and could only admire the
intelligence of 'Sherlock Holmes' Fischer. 1–0

(125) Fischer,Bobby - Larsen,Bent [B88]

Fischer Semifinal Denver 1971 (4), 1943
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¥c4 e6 7.¥b3 ¥e7 8.¥e3 0–
0 9.0–0 ¥d7 10.f4 £c8 11.f5 ¤xd4 12.¥xd4 exf5 13.£d3 fxe4 14.¤xe4 ¤xe4
15.£xe4 ¥e6 16.¦f3 £c6 17.¦e1 £xe4 18.¦xe4 White has a lot of pressure for a
pawn. 18...d5 19.¦g3! g6 20.¥xd5 ¥d6?
Larsen demonstrates his usual optimism. [20...¥xd5 21.¦xe7 ¦fe8 leads to a defendable
endgame (Gipslis).] 21.¦xe6! ¥xg3 22.¦e7 ¥d6 23.¦xb7 ¦ac8 [Larsen prefers 23...a5
after the game, but 24.c4 ¦ae8 25.¦d7 ¥b4 26.a3 ¦e7 27.axb4 ¦xd7 28.bxa5 favors
White.] 24.c4 a5 25.¦a7 Black can grab his last chance with a natural move. 25...¥c7?
[Larsen does not believe in 25...¥c5! 26.¥xc5 ¦xc5 27.¢f2 but 27...¦fc8 28.¥xf7+ ¢f8
29.¥d5 ¦xc4! 30.¥xc4 ¦xc4 31.¦xa5 ¦c2+ 32.¢f3 ¦xb2 might draw.] 26.g3 ¦fe8 27.¢f1
¦e7 28.¥f6 ¦e3 29.¥c3 h5 30.¦a6 ¥e5 31.¥d2 ¦d3 32.¢e2 ¦d4 33.¥c3 ¦cxc4
34.¥xc4 ¦xc4 35.¢d3 ¦c5 36.¦xa5 ¦xa5 37.¥xa5 ¥xb2 38.a4 ¢f8 39.¥c3
¥xc3 40.¢xc3 ¢e7 41.¢d4 ¢d6 42.a5 f6 43.a6 ¢c6 44.a7 ¢b7 45.¢d5 h4
46.¢e6 Fischer played a fantastic endgame. 1–0
(126) Petrosian,Tigran - Fischer,Bobby [A06]

Fischer Final Buenos Aires 1971 (5), 1943
[JvR]
1.¤f3 c5 2.b3 d5 3.¥b2 f6! 4.c4 d4 5.d3 e5 6.e3 ¤e7 7.¥e2 ¤ec6 8.¤bd2 ¥e7 9.0–
0 0–0 10.e4 a6 11.¤e1 b5 12.¥g4 ¥xg4 13.£xg4 £c8 14.£e2 ¤d7 15.¤c2 ¦b8
16.¦fc1 £e8 17.¥a3 ¥d6 18.¤e1 g6 19.cxb5 axb5 20.¥b2 ¤b6 21.¤ef3 ¦a8
22.a3 ¤a5 23.£d1 £f7 24.a4 bxa4 25.bxa4 c4 26.dxc4 ¤bxc4 27.¤xc4 ¤xc4
28.£e2 ¤xb2 29.£xb2 ¦fb8 30.£a2 ¥b4 31.£xf7+ ¢xf7

Fischer has utilized the passive play by his opponent and achieved a positional advantage.
32.¦c7+ ¢e6! 33.g4! [Petrosian does not like 33.¦xh7 ¥c3 34.¦d1 ¦xa4] 33...¥c3
34.¦a2 ¦c8 35.¦xc8 ¦xc8 36.a5 ¦a8 37.a6 ¦a7 38.¢f1 g5 Black closes the kingside
before he activates his king. 39.¢e2 [Better is 39.h4 h6 40.h5] 39...¢d6 40.¢d3 ¢c5
41.¤g1?! [More useful is 41.h4 and an exchange.] 41...¢b5 42.¤e2 ¥a5 Black will gain
a pawn as a reward for his excellent restriction. 43.¦b2+? Petrosian blunders right after
the resumption. [Correct is 43.¤g3! ¢xa6! (Korchnoi) (43...¦xa6 44.¤f5 ¦c6 45.¦c2 The
rooks are exchanged.) 44.¤h5 ¦f7 45.¦b2 White might survive by passive restriction.]
43...¢xa6 44.¦b1 ¦c7 45.¦b2 ¥e1 46.f3 ¢a5 47.¦c2 ¦b7 48.¦a2+ ¢b5 49.¦b2+
¥b4 50.¦a2 ¦c7 51.¦a1 ¦c8 52.¦a7?! [More resistance is offered by 52.¦a2! but
52...¦c7 53.¦a1 ¦c6! 54.¦a2 ¥c3! 55.¦a3 ¢b4 56.¦a2 ¥e1! 57.¦a1 ¥f2 looks horrible for
White.] 52...¥a5! 53.¦d7 [Or 53.¦xh7 ¥b6! 54.¦f7 ¦a8 55.¦xf6 ¦a3+ (Shamkovich).]
53...¥b6 54.¦d5+ ¥c5 55.¤c1 ¢a4 56.¦d7 ¥b4 57.¤e2 ¢b3 58.¦b7 ¦a8
59.¦xh7 ¦a1 The net around the white king is closed. 60.¤xd4+ exd4 61.¢xd4 ¦d1+
62.¢e3 ¥c5+ 63.¢e2 ¦h1 64.h4 ¢c4 65.h5 ¦h2+ 66.¢e1 ¢d3 Fischer had won an
important game and crushed 'the other guy's ego'. 0–1
(127) Spassky,Boris - Fischer,Bobby [B46]

Fischer W Ch Reykjavik 1972 (6), 1943
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 a6 5.¤c3 ¤c6 6.¥e3 ¤f6 7.¥d3 d5 8.exd5
exd5 9.0–0 ¥d6 10.¤xc6 bxc6 11.¥d4 0–0 12.£f3 ¥e6 13.¦fe1 c5 14.¥xf6 £xf6
15.£xf6 gxf6 Fischer has the initiative. 16.¦ad1 ¦fd8 17.¥e2 ¦ab8 18.b3 c4
19.¤xd5! Spassky keeps the equality with 'a petite combination'. 19...¥xd5 20.¦xd5
¥xh2+ 21.¢xh2 ¦xd5 22.¥xc4 ¦d2 23.¥xa6 ¦xc2 24.¦e2 ¦xe2 25.¥xe2 ¦d8
Fischer takes the initiative again. 26.a4 ¦d2 27.¥c4 ¦a2! Black chooses for restriction of
the queenside. [27...¦xf2 28.a5 ¢f8 29.a6 ¦b2 (previous analyses continue with 29...¦a2?
30.b4! ¦a4 31.b5) 30.¥d5 ¦a2 31.¥c4 ¦b2=] 28.¢g3 ¢f8 29.¢f3?! [29.f4 f5 30.¢f3 ¢e7
31.g3 builds a fortress (Karpov).] 29...¢e7 30.g4?! f5! 31.gxf5 f6 32.¥g8 h6 33.¢g3
¢d6 34.¢f3 ¦a1 35.¢g2? [Right is 35.¥c4 ¦g1 36.a5 ¢c5 37.a6 ¢b6 38.¢e3 h5 39.f3 h4
40.¢f2 ¦g5 41.¥f1! ¦xf5 42.¢g2 White is just in time.] 35...¢e5 36.¥e6 ¢f4 37.¥d7

¦b1 38.¥e6 ¦b2 39.¥c4 ¦a2 40.¥e6 h5 White is lost in the adjourned position.
41.¥d7
Fischer became the eleventh world champion by this win. He had achieved his aim.[The
interesting 41.¢h3 ¦xf2 42.b4 draws according to Timman, but Krogius gives the win
42...¢g5 43.b5 ¦f3+ 44.¢g2 ¦a3 45.b6 ¦xa4 46.b7 ¦b4; 41.¥d7 Spassky resigned due to
41...¢g4 42.¥c6 h4 43.¥f3+ ¢xf5 44.¥c6 (Krogius) 44...¦b2 45.¥d5 ¢e5 46.¥c4 ¦a2
47.¢h3 ¢f4] 0–1
(128) Huebner,Robert - Spassky,Boris [C67]

Huebner Venezia 1989 (1), 1948
[JvR]
Robert Huebner (1948) plays and analyses with great precision. 1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6
3.¥b5 ¤f6 4.0–0 ¤xe4 5.d4 ¥e7 6.£e2 ¤d6 7.¥xc6 bxc6 8.dxe5 ¤b7 9.¤c3 0–0
10.¦e1 ¦e8 11.£c4 ¤c5 12.¥g5 ¥a6 13.¥xe7 ¥xc4 14.¥xd8 ¦axd8 15.¦ad1 f6
16.exf6 ¦xe1+ 17.¦xe1 gxf6 Black has a damaged pawn structure. Square f5 is a
weakness for him. 18.¤d4 ¢f7? [Correct is 18...¤e6! 19.¤f5 ¤g7 20.¤xg7 ¢xg7 21.¦e7+
¥f7] 19.b3 ¥a6 If the bishop goes to e6, he will stand in the way of the knight. 20.f4 ¦e8
21.¦xe8 ¢xe8 22.¢f2 ¢f7 23.g4 ¤e6 24.¤xe6 ¢xe6 25.¤e4 d6?

[Better is 25...¥c8 26.¢f3 d6 27.b4 f5 28.gxf5+ ¢xf5 29.¤g3+ ¢g6] 26.g5 fxg5 27.¤xg5+
¢f5 28.¤xh7 ¢xf4 29.¤f6 ¥c8 30.¤e8 ¥f5 31.c3 Pawn c7 is lost. 31...¥b1 [More
subtle is 31...¢e4 32.¢e2 ¥g4+ 33.¢d2 ¢f3 34.¤xc7 ¢g2 35.¤e8 d5 36.¤f6 ¥h3 37.¢d3
¢xh2 38.¢d4 Black has kept material equality, but white's positional advantage seems to
be decisive.; Huebner analyses the surprising 31...¥g4! 32.¤xc7 ¢e4! 33.¤e8 ¢d3 34.¤xd6
¢xc3 35.¤c4 c5 36.h4 ¢b4! (He continues with 36...¥h5 37.¢e3 ¢c2 and evaluates the
position as drawn. However White wins by 38.¢e4! ¢b1 39.¢d5 ¢xa2 40.¤a5 ¢a3
41.¢xc5) 37.¢e3 a5 38.¢d2! a4 39.¤e5 ¥f5 (39...axb3 40.¤xg4 bxa2 41.¤e3) 40.bxa4 c4
41.¤c6+ ¢xa4 42.¢c3 ¥g4 43.¢xc4 ¢a3 44.¤e5 ¥h5 45.¢d4 ¢xa2 46.¢e4 and White
wins with great difficulty.] 32.a3 ¥a2 33.b4 c5 34.¤xc7 ¥c4 35.h4 cxb4 36.axb4 ¢e4
[Insufficient is 36...¢g4 37.¢e3 ¢xh4 38.¢d4 ¥f1 39.c4] 37.¤e8 ¢e5 38.¢e3 ¥f7
39.¤c7 ¥g6 40.¤b5 ¢d5 41.¤xa7 ¢c4 42.¤c6 Huebner won the match with 4-
2.[Elementary is 42.¤c6 ¢xc3 43.b5 ¥e8 44.¤d4] 1–0
(129) Elwert,Hans Marcus - Andersson,Ulf [B42]

Andersson Millennium Email Tourn. 2000, 1951
[JvR]
Ulf Andersson (1951) plays highly accurate over-the-board chess. This quality also is very
useful in correspondence chess. 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 a6 5.¥d3 ¥c5
6.¤b3 ¥a7 7.0–0 ¤e7 8.£e2 d6 9.¥e3 ¥xe3 10.£xe3 e5 11.c4 ¥e6 12.¤c3 ¤d7
13.¥e2 £b6 14.£xb6 ¤xb6 15.¤d2 ¤c6 16.b3 ¤d4 17.¦fd1 ¢e7 18.¤f1 a5
19.¤e3 a4 20.¥d3 ¦hc8 21.¦db1 axb3 22.axb3 g6 23.g3 ¢d8 24.¦xa8 ¦xa8
25.¤c2 ¤xc2 26.¥xc2
Black controls an open file as compensation for the backward pawn on d6. 26...¥d7!?
Andersson makes this move after 43 days! He plays for a win. The opponent answers
sharply. 27.¦d1 ¢e7 28.f4 f6 29.¢f2 ¦a3 30.¦d3 ¥e6 31.¤b5 ¦a2 32.¦d2 ¤d7!
33.¢e2 [Naturally 33.¤xd6?? ¦xc2 34.¤c8+ ¢d8 35.¦xc2 ¢xc8 costs material.] 33...¤c5
34.f5 ¥d7!? Apparently the white pieces are brought to better squares. 35.¤c3 ¦a3
36.¤d5+ ¢f7 37.b4 ¤b3 38.¥xb3 ¦xb3 39.fxg6+ hxg6 40.¦a2 ¥e6 41.b5 f5!
42.¦a7 ¥xd5 43.exd5 e4! The pointe becomes apparent. Andersson sacrifices a pawn
for the conquest of the center. 44.¢d2! [The black king marches forwards in 44.¦xb7+?!

¢f6 45.¦d7? (45.¢d1! draws according to Elwert) 45...¢e5 46.¢d2 ¢d4 47.¦xd6 e3+
48.¢c2 ¦c3+ 49.¢d1 ¢d3] 44...¢f6 45.¢c2 ¦b4 46.¢c3 ¦b1 A critical position has
arisen again. 47.¢c2?! [Capturing the pawn is right this time: 47.¦xb7! e3! 48.¢d3 ¦b3+
49.¢e2 ¢e5 50.¦h7 g5 51.h4! ¢d4! 52.hxg5 ¦b2+ 53.¢f1! ¢xc4! (Not 53...¢d3? 54.¦e7
¦b1+ 55.¢g2 e2 due to 56.c5!) 54.¦e7 ¢d3 55.g6 ¦xb5 56.g7 ¦b8 57.¦a7 White draws.]
47...e3?! Andersson misses the chance to win. [Better is 47...¦h1! 48.¦xb7 ¦xh2+ 49.¢c3
¦h3 50.¢c2 ¦xg3 51.b6 ¦h3!! (Elwert continues with 51...¦g2+ ) 52.¦b8 ¦h7 53.¦e8 ¢g5
54.¦e6 f4 55.¦xe4 ¦b7 Black has a big advantage.] 48.¢d3 ¦b3+ 49.¢d4 g5 50.¦a2 b6
51.¦e2 f4 52.gxf4 gxf4 53.¢e4 ¦c3 54.¢xf4 ¦xc4+ 55.¢xe3 ¢e5 56.¢f3+! ¢xd5
57.¢g3 ¦c5 This endgame was played well by both men. ½–½
(130) Smejkal,Jan - Karpov,Anatoly [B49]

Karpov Leningrad 1973 (1), 1951
[JvR]
Karpov (1951) is one of the greatest players of the endgame in the history of chess. He
applies prophylaxis in an excellent manner. 1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤c6
5.¤c3 £c7 6.¥e2 a6 7.0–0 ¤f6 8.¥e3 ¥b4 9.¤a4 0–0 10.¤xc6 bxc6 11.¤b6 ¦b8
12.¤xc8 ¦fxc8 13.¥xa6 ¦d8 14.¥d3 ¥d6 15.¢h1 ¥e5 16.c3 ¦xb2 17.£c1 ¤g4
18.f4 ¤xe3 19.£xb2 ¥xf4 20.£f2 ¤xf1 21.¦xf1 e5 22.g3 £d6 23.¥e2 ¥g5
24.£xf7+ ¢h8 25.a4 ¥e7 26.a5 ¦f8 27.£c4 ¦xf1+ 28.¥xf1
The distant passed brings a great advantage to White. 28...£f6 29.¢g2 £f8 30.¥e2
¥c5 31.¥g4! £f2+ 32.¢h3 d6 Black has stopped the passed pawn. 33.¥d7 White
wins a pawn. [Petrosian and Keres analyze the strong alternative 33.£e6! in the press
room. 33...g6! 34.£e7! £f1+ (not Karpov's 34...¥e3? 35.¥e2!) 35.¢h4! ¥e3 36.a6 h6 White
has to deliver perpetual check.] 33...g6 34.¥xc6 ¢g7 35.¥b5 £b2 36.a6 ¥g1 37.£e2
£xc3 38.¥c4 £c1! Karpov notices a trick. [38...£e3 draws.] 39.£f1? Poor Jan! He loses
a pawn. [Correct is 39.¢g2 ] 39...£h6+ 40.¢g2 £xh2+ 41.¢f3 £h5+ 42.¢g2 £h2+
43.¢f3 ¥d4? [Both players miss 43...g5! during some moves.] 44.¥d5 ¥c5 45.¥c6
¥d4 46.¥b7 g5! At last! 47.¢g4 h5+! 48.¢f5! [Terrible is 48.¢xg5 £xg3+ 49.¢xh5 ¥f2]
48...£xg3 49.¢e6 £f2! 50.£b5 [The pointe is 50.£xf2 ¥xf2 51.¢f5 g4 and the g-pawn
queens.] 50...£f6+ 51.¢d5 g4 52.¥c8 £e7 53.¥f5 ¢h6 54.£f1 £c7 55.£e2 £c5+

56.¢e6 ¢g5 57.£f1 £a3 58.£e2 ¥c5 59.£d2+ £e3 60.£a5 ¥b6 61.£a2 £f2
62.£b1 g3 63.¥h3 ¢h4 64.¥g2 £g1 Karpov chooses a witty finish. 65.£xg1 ¥xg1
66.¢xd6 [66.¢f5 ¥d4 67.¥f1 g2 68.¥xg2 ¢g3 wins elegantly.] 66...¥d4 67.a7 ¥xa7
68.¢xe5 ¢g4 69.¢d5 h4 70.e5 h3 71.¥xh3+ ¢xh3 72.e6 ¥c5! Smejkal could not
solve the set problems. 0–1
(131) Karpov,Anatoly - Hort,Vlastimil [B10]

Karpov Tilburg 1979 (2), 1951
[JvR]
1.e4 c6 2.¤c3 d5 3.¤f3 dxe4 4.¤xe4 ¤f6 5.¤xf6+ exf6 6.¥e2 ¥d6 7.0–0 0–0 8.d4
¦e8 9.¦e1 ¥f5 10.¥e3 ¤d7 11.h3 ¥e4 12.¤d2 f5 13.¤xe4 fxe4 14.c4 £c7
15.¥f1 ¥h2+ 16.¢h1 ¥f4 17.£d2 ¥xe3 18.£xe3 ¤f6 19.¦ad1 ¦ad8 20.¦d2 h6
21.g3 £a5 22.b3 ¦d7 23.¥g2 ¦ed8 24.¦ed1 £g5 25.¢g1 a6 26.¦e2 ¢f8 27.£c3
£f5 28.a4 ¢g8 29.£e3 ¦e8 30.¢f1 £a5 31.£d2 £xd2 32.¦exd2 e3 33.¦e2 exf2
34.¦xe8+ ¤xe8 35.¢xf2
White controls more territory. He plans to attack on the queenside. 35...a5 Black forestalls
the plan. 36.¢e3 ¢f8 37.¦b1 ¢e7 38.g4 ¢d8 39.b4 ¦e7+ 40.¢d3 axb4 41.¦xb4
¢c7 42.¦b1 ¤f6 43.a5 ¤d7 44.¦a1 ¤b8 45.h4 ¤a6 46.¦b1 ¤b8 47.¥f3 ¤d7
48.¦a1 ¦e8 49.¦f1 The maneuvering has little effect so far. [Unwise is 49.a6? ¦a8! 50.a7
¤b6] 49...¦e7 50.¥g2 ¤b8 51.¦f4 ¤d7 52.¦f1 ¤b8 53.¥e4 ¤a6 54.¦b1 ¤b8
55.¥f5 ¤d7 56.¦a1 g6? Black should have continued with quiet moves. [Parma suggests
56...¤b8 ] 57.¥xd7 ¦xd7 Square f6 has become a big hole in the black position, a fatal
weakening. 58.¦f1! ¢b8!? [The critical variation is 58...¢d6 59.¦f6+ ¢e7 60.g5 hxg5
61.hxg5 ¦c7 (61...¦d6 62.¦xd6 ¢xd6 63.¢e4 and the pawn ending is lost according to
Gligoric) 62.¢c3 ¦c8 63.¢b4 ¦h8 aims at g5. (63...¦a8 prevents a further invasion. 64.d5
cxd5 65.cxd5 ¦d8 66.¢c5) 64.a6 bxa6 65.¦xc6 ¦h5 66.¦xa6 ¦xg5 67.¦a7+ The two extra
tempi will bring victory.] 59.¦f6 ¢a7 60.h5 ¢a6 Exchange does not suffice. 61.g5! A
fine decision. 61...hxg5 62.h6 ¢xa5 63.h7 ¦d8 64.¦xf7 b5 65.cxb5 ¢xb5 [Or
65...cxb5 66.¦g7 ¦h8 67.d5] 66.¦b7+! White wins a tempo. 66...¢a6 67.¦g7 ¦h8
68.¢e4 ¢b5 69.¢f3 ¢c4 70.¦d7 ¢d3 71.¢g4 ¦xh7 72.¦xh7 ¢xd4 73.¦d7+
White gains another tempo.[73.¦d7+ ¢e4 74.¦c7 ¢d5 75.¢xg5+-] 1–0

(132) Kasparov,Gary - Karpov,Anatoly [E15]

Karpov W Ch Moscow 1984 (3), 1951
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 b6 4.g3 ¥a6 5.b3 ¥b4+ 6.¥d2 ¥e7 7.¥g2 0–0 8.0–0 d5
9.¤e5 c6 10.¥c3 ¤fd7 11.¤xd7 ¤xd7 12.¤d2 ¦c8 13.e4 b5 14.¦e1 dxc4 15.bxc4
¤b6 16.cxb5 cxb5 17.¦c1 ¥a3 18.¦c2 ¤a4 19.¥a1 ¦xc2 20.£xc2 £a5 21.£d1
¦c8 22.¤b3 £b4 23.d5 exd5 24.exd5 ¤c3 25.£d4 £xd4 26.¤xd4 ¤xa2 27.¤c6
¥c5 28.¥h3 ¦a8 29.¥d4 ¥xd4 30.¤xd4 ¢f8 31.d6 ¤c3 32.¤c6 ¥b7 33.¥g2
¦e8 34.¤e5 f6 35.d7 ¦d8 36.¥xb7 fxe5 37.¥c6 ¢e7 38.¥xb5 ¤xb5 39.¦xe5+
¢xd7 40.¦xb5 ¢c6 41.¦h5?!
[More resistance is offered by 41.¦e5! ¦a8 42.¦e6+ ¢c5 43.¦e7 a5 44.¦xg7 (Yusupov)
44...a4 45.¦c7+ ¢b4 46.¦b7+ ¢a5! 47.¦xh7 a3 48.¦c7 a2 49.¦c1 ¢b4 50.¦a1] 41...h6
42.¦e5 ¦a8 43.¦a5 [Interesting is 43.¦e6+!? ¢c5 44.¦g6 a5 45.¦xg7 a4 46.¦c7+ ¢b4
47.¦b7+ ¢a5! (Yusupov). Black has an extra pawn compared to the previous variation.]
43...¢b6 44.¦a2! Square a1 remains open for the king. 44...a5 45.¢f1 a4 46.¢e2 ¢c5
47.¢d2 a3 48.¢c1 ¢d4 49.f4! The f-pawn needs the protection by another pawn.
49...¢e4 50.¢b1 ¦b8+ 51.¢a1 ¦b2! 52.¦xa3! ¦xh2 Black's advantage has become
the central position of his king. 53.¢b1 ¦d2! 54.¦a6 [Or 54.¦a7 g5 55.¢c1 ¦d5 56.¦e7+
¢f5] 54...¢f5 55.¦a7 g5 56.¦a6 g4!! Subtle play overcomes an excellent defense.
57.¦xh6 [An important alternative is 57.¦a5+!? ¢e4 58.¦a4+ ¢f3 59.¦a3+ ¢e2! 60.¦a2 h5!
Black gains a tempo because he will queen with check. 61.¦xd2+ ¢xd2 62.f5 h4 63.f6
hxg3 64.f7 g2 65.f8£ g1£+ 66.¢a2 £a7+ 67.¢b3 £d4 and a theoretical win.] 57...¦g2
58.¦h5+ ¢e4 59.f5 ¦f2 60.¢c1 ¢f3 61.¢d1 [The stubborn 61.f6! ¢xg3 62.¦h6 ¢g2
63.¢d1 g3 64.¦g6! ¦f5 65.¢e2 ¦e5+ 66.¢d3 ¢f3 67.¢d4 ¦h5!! 68.f7 ¦f5 69.¦g7 g2 leads
to mutual zugzwang. 70.¢d3 ¦f4 and Black wins.] 61...¢xg3 62.¢e1 ¢g2 63.¦g5 g3
Black wins. 64.¦h5 [A pawn costs 64.¢d1 ¢h3 65.¢e1 ¢h4] 64...¦f4 65.¢e2 ¦e4+
66.¢d3 ¢f3 67.¦h1 g2 68.¦h3+ ¢g4 69.¦h8 ¦f4 70.¢e2 ¦xf5 Karpov also won a
spectacular knight versus bishop ending in this match. 0–1

(133) Karpov,Anatoly - Sokolov,Andrej [E15]

Karpov Final Linares 1987 (4), 1951
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 b6 4.g3 ¥a6 5.b3 ¥b4+ 6.¥d2 ¥e7 7.¤c3 0–0 8.e4 d5
9.cxd5 ¥xf1 10.¢xf1 exd5 11.e5 ¤e4 12.£e2 ¤xc3 13.¥xc3 £d7 14.¢g2 ¤c6
15.¦he1 ¤d8 16.¤g1 c5 17.f4 cxd4 18.¥xd4 £f5 19.¦ad1 ¥b4 20.¦f1 ¤e6
21.£d3 £xd3 22.¦xd3 ¦ac8 23.¤f3 ¦c2+ 24.¦f2 ¦fc8 25.f5 ¤xd4 26.¤xd4
¦xf2+ 27.¢xf2 White has two pieces and two pawns in the central area. Black only has a
blockaded pawn in the same place. 27...¦c1 A counteraction develops by an attack in the
back. 28.g4 ¢f8 29.¢f3 ¦f1+ 30.¢g3 ¦c1 31.¢f4 If the rook delivers check, the
knight interferes. 31...h6 32.h4 ¢e8 33.¤f3 ¦c2 34.a4 ¦b2?! [The exchange 34...¦c3 is
okay.] 35.¤d4 ¥e7?! [Risky looks 35...¦d2 36.¢e3 ¦xd3+ 37.¢xd3 ¢d7 due to 38.e6+
fxe6 39.¤xe6 but 39...¥e7 40.¤xg7 ¥xh4 draws.] 36.h5 a6 37.¢f3 ¥c5 38.¤e2 d4?!
The white king gets an entrance to the center. [More subtle is 38...¦b1! 39.¤f4 ¦f1+
40.¢g3 ¦g1+=] 39.¤f4 ¢d7?! Black helps the advance. 40.e6+ ¢e8 [40...fxe6 41.¤xe6
costs a pawn.] 41.¢e4 a5
White seals a move. 42.¦f3 ¦b1 43.¤d5 ¦g1? [Karpov has prepared 43...¢f8 44.e7+
¥xe7 45.¢xd4 ¦g1 46.¢c4 ¦xg4+ 47.¢b5 ¦d4 (he continues in his optimism with
47...¥d8 48.¦c3 ¦h4 49.¢c6 ¦xh5 50.¢d7 ¦xf5 51.¤xb6) 48.¤xb6 ¥b4 is much stronger.]
44.¢d3! White has achieved a lot. The advance in the central area has progressed. The
king is on his way to the queenside. 44...¦xg4 [Or 44...¢f8 45.¦f4 ¦g3+ 46.¢c4 d3
47.¢c3] 45.f6! The f-pawn should not be captured. 45...¥d6 [The other point is 45...fxe6
46.f7+ ¢f8 47.¤c7] 46.¤xb6! ¦g5 47.fxg7 ¦xg7 [47...fxe6 48.¦f6 ¦xg7 49.¦xe6+ ¥e7
50.¤d5 will lead to a won pawn ending.] 48.¤c4 ¥b4 49.exf7+ ¦xf7 50.¦xf7 ¢xf7
Matters seem to be alright for Black, but White has a forced win. 51.¤e5+! The knight
becomes highly active. 51...¢f6 52.¤c6 ¥e1 53.¤xd4 ¥b4 [Not 53...¢g5?? 54.¤f3+]
54.¤c6 ¥e1 55.¢e2 ¥c3 56.¢d3 ¥e1 57.¢c4 ¢g5 58.¤xa5! Karpov decides the
endgame with a sacrifice. 58...¥xa5 [The alternative is 58...¢xh5 59.¤c6 ¢g4 60.b4 h5
61.a5 h4 62.a6 h3 63.a7 h2 64.a8£ h1£ 65.¤e5+ (Karpov).] 59.b4 ¥d8 60.a5 ¢xh5
61.¢b5 ¥g5 62.a6 ¥e3 63.¢c6 The endgame seems an easy win to Karpov, but further
analyses give chances to Black. 1–0

(134) Karpov,Anatoly - Timman,Jan [D85]

Karpov FIDE W Ch Amsterdam 1993 (5), 1951
[JvR]
1.d4 ¤f6 2.c4 g6 3.¤c3 d5 4.cxd5 ¤xd5 5.e4 ¤xc3 6.bxc3 ¥g7 7.¥e3 c5 8.£d2
£a5 9.¦b1 b6 10.¥b5+ ¥d7 11.¥e2 0–0 12.¦c1 ¥b5!? 13.d5 ¤d7 14.c4 £xd2+
15.¢xd2 ¥a4 16.¤h3!? e6 17.¤f4 ¦ae8 18.f3 ¤e5 19.¦c3 ¥d7 20.¦a3 exd5
21.exd5 h5! Black remains active. 22.¦xa7 ¥f5!? 23.¦d1 ¦a8 24.¦xa8 ¦xa8 25.¢e1
¦xa2 Active black pieces compensate the central position of White. 26.d6 ¤d7 27.¤d5
¢f8
Karpov rules in the center. Timman is active on the flanks. 28.¥d3!? ¥xd3 [The
justification gives 28...¦xg2 29.¥xf5 gxf5 30.¤xb6! ¤xb6 31.d7 ¤xd7 32.¦xd7 draw
(Karpov).] 29.¦xd3 ¥e5 [Not 29...¦xg2? 30.¦a3!] 30.¥h6+ ¢g8 31.¤e7+ ¢h7 32.¥d2
¥xh2!? 33.f4 ¥g1 [33...h4! keeps a plus.] 34.¤c6 ¢g8 [34...f6! controls square e5.]
35.¤e5 ¦a7 36.¤c6 ¦a1+ 37.¢e2 ¢f8 38.f5! gxf5 39.¦h3 [Dangerous is 39.¦g3! ¦a2
40.¢d1 ¦a1+ 41.¢c2 ¦a2+ 42.¢c1 The king has been lured to c1. 42...f6 43.¥h6+ ¢e8
44.¦g8+ ¢f7 45.¦g7+ ¢e6 46.¥f4 ¥e3+! 47.¥xe3 ¦a4 Black escapes.] 39...¥d4 40.¦xh5
¥f6?! [40...¦g1 draws more easily.] 41.¦xf5 ¦a4 42.¢d3 ¢e8 43.¥g5 ¥a1?! [43...¦a1
is more prudent.] 44.¥e7! f6 45.g4 ¦a3+ 46.¢e4 ¦c3 47.¦h5 ¦xc4+ 48.¢f5 White
has changed the initiative into an attack on the king. 48...b5? [Right is 48...¦c1! 49.¢g6
(Karpov) 49...¤e5+ 50.¤xe5 ¥xe5 51.¦h8+ ¢d7 52.¢f7 ¥xd6 53.¦d8+ ¢c7 54.¦xd6 ¦c4
drawn.] 49.¦h8+ ¢f7 50.¦d8 ¥e5 51.¤xe5+ ¤xe5 52.¦f8+ ¢g7 53.g5! This match
had no adjournment after the first time control. Hence, this game was played in one
session. A resumption after the second time control did not occur during the match. The
organizers wanted to minimize the influence of computer analyses during the
adjournment. 1–0

(135) Gelfand,Boris - Karpov,Anatoly [E14]

Karpov Sanghi Nagar 1995 (6), 1951
[JvR]
1.c4 ¤f6 2.d4 e6 3.¤f3 b6 4.e3 ¥b7 5.¤c3 d5 6.cxd5 exd5 7.¥b5+ c6 8.¥d3 ¥e7
9.0–0 0–0 10.b3 ¤bd7 11.¥b2 ¥d6 12.¦c1 ¦e8 13.¤e2 £e7 14.¤g3 g6 15.£e2
¥a3 16.¦fe1 £d6 17.£c2 ¥xb2 18.£xb2 c5 19.¦ed1 ¦ac8 20.¤e2 a6 21.¦c2
cxd4 22.¤exd4 ¦xc2 23.¥xc2 ¦c8 24.¦c1 ¤e4 25.¥d3 ¦xc1+ 26.£xc1 £c5
27.£d1 b5 28.¤e2 b4 29.£a1 £d6 30.£d4 £c5 31.£a1 £d6 32.h3 ¤dc5 33.¥c2
£f6 34.£e5 £xe5 35.¤xe5 Black has an isolated pawn but controls more territory.
35...f6 36.¤f3 ¤e6 37.¤e1 ¢f7 38.f3 ¤4c5 39.g4 a5 40.¢f2 ¥a6 41.h4 h6 42.h5?!
Gelfand wants to play for a win and accepts a slight weakness. 42...gxh5 43.gxh5 ¢e7
44.¤g3 ¤g7 45.¥g6 ¢d6 46.¢g2 ¥b5 47.¤c2 ¤ce6 48.f4 ¥d7 49.¢f2 ¤c7
50.¤d4 ¤b5 51.¤xb5+ ¥xb5 52.¢e1 ¥d7 53.¥d3 ¥g4 54.¥e2
[54.¥g6 is slightly better.] 54...¤f5! This move has become possible. 55.¤xf5+ [Karpov
condemns and Gelfand praises the alternative 55.¥xg4 We investigate 55...¤xg3 56.¢d2
¤e4+ 57.¢c2 ¢c5 58.¥f3 White wants to exchange. 58...¤c3 59.a4 White has a fortress.]
55...¥xf5 56.¢d2 ¢c5 57.¥d3 ¥d7 The exchange of bishops draws. 58.¥c2 ¥e8
59.¥g6 ¥c6 60.¥c2 ¥d7 The game is adjourned. Black seems to have a minimal
advantage. White moves his bishop from c2 to d1 and back in order to prevent a5-a4. If
Black exchanges the bishops, the game is drawn. 61.¥d1 [Karpov's team has analyzed
61.¢e1! for hours. Promising seems to be 61...d4 62.¢d2 dxe3+ 63.¢xe3 ¥e6 64.¥b1 ¥g8
Zugzwang. 65.¥d3 a4 66.bxa4 ¥xa2 67.a5 ¥e6 68.a6 ¢b6 69.¢d4 ¥c8 I thought this
position is won for Black until Gelfand sent me Karpov's analyses in 'Schach'. The night
before the resumption Tolya cannot fall asleep and finds 70.¥c2!! ¥xa6 (and 70...¢xa6
71.¢c5) 71.¢d5 draw.] 61...¥h3 [I find 61...¥e6! more direct. 62.¥c2 d4! Black threatens
..a4. White has to withdraw. 63.¥b1! ¥g8! 64.¢e2 ¥d5 65.¢f2 ¥e6 66.¢f3 White avoids
zugzwang.] 62.¥f3 ¥f5 [62...d4 63.¥e4! ¥e6 64.¥b1 draws.] 63.¢c1?! [Gelfand analyses
63.¥e2 ¥e4 (63...d4 64.¥d3; 63...¥b1 64.¥d3 ¥xa2 65.¢c2 a4 66.bxa4 ¥c4 67.¥xc4 dxc4
68.e4! ¢d4 69.e5 fxe5 70.f5 b3+ 71.¢b2 c3+ 72.¢xb3 ¢d3 73.f6 c2 74.f7 c1£ 75.f8£ and
White survives) 64.¥d3 f5 65.¢e2 d4 66.¢d2 ¥f3 67.¥xf5 ¥xh5 68.e4 ¥f3 69.¢d3 h5
70.e5 drawn.] 63...¥d7! 64.¢d2 White cannot prevent ..a4. [64.¥d1? d4 65.¢d2 ¥f5!

66.¥e2 dxe3+ 67.¢xe3 ¥b1 68.¢d2 ¢d4 Black has achieved the entrance.] 64...a4! Black
has achieved an important goal: the advance of the a-pawn. 65.bxa4? [Correct is 65.¥d1!
a3 66.¥c2 ¥e6! 67.¥d1!! (Fridstein and Atlas find the complicated line 67.¥d3? d4! 68.¥c2
dxe3+ 69.¢xe3 ¥g8 70.¥d1 ¥h7 71.¥e2 ¥c2 72.¥c4 ¥d1 73.¥f7 ¢d6 74.¢d2 ¥g4
75.¥g6 ¢e7 Zugzwang. 76.¢c1 ¥e6 77.¥c2 ¥f7 78.¥d1 ¢e6 79.¢d2 ¢f5 80.¢e3 ¥e6
81.¢f3 ¥d5+ 82.¢e3 ¥f7 Zugzwang. 83.¥c2+ ¢g4 84.¥d1+ ¢g3 85.¢d4 ¢f2 86.¢c5 ¢e1
87.¥c2 ¢d2 88.¥g6 ¥xb3 89.¢xb4 ¥xa2 90.¢xa3 ¥e6 91.¢b4 ¢e3 92.f5 ¥c8 and Black
wins.) 67...¥f7! 68.¢d3! ¥g8 69.¢d2 ¥h7 70.¥c2 White protects the weaknesses and
keeps the answer e4 in reserve.] 65...¥xa4 66.¥e2 ¥c6 67.¥f3 ¥e8 68.¥d1 d4
69.¢d3 ¥b5+ Black makes a slow progress. 70.¢e4 [70.¢d2 ¥d7 71.¢d3 ¥f5+ 72.¢d2
dxe3+ 73.¢xe3 ¢c4 The king enters. 74.¢d2 ¢d4 75.¥c2 ¥g4 76.¥g6 ¥e6 77.¥b1 ¥f7
Black wins a pawn. White cannot protect everything after the fatal pawn exchange.]
70...d3 71.¢f5 ¥c4 72.¢e4 White has no better. 72...d2 73.f5 [73.¥g4 f5+ (Ree).]
73...¥xa2 74.¢d3 ¥b1+ 75.¢xd2 ¥xf5 76.¥e2 ¥e4 77.¢c1 ¢d6 78.¢b2 ¥d5
79.¥d3 ¥f7 80.¥e2 ¢e5 Complicated zugzwang positions may arise in endings with
bishops of the same color. 0–1
(136) Timman,Jan - Velimirovic,Dragoljub [D30]

Timman Rio de Janeiro 1979 (1), 1951
[JvR]
Jan Timman (1951) plays a solid endgame. He competed with Karpov for the FIDE-title in
1993. 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.g3 ¤c6 6.¥g2 cxd4 7.¤xd4 ¥c5
8.¤xc6 bxc6 9.£c2 £e7 10.0–0 ¥d7 11.¤c3 ¤f6 12.¥g5 0–0 13.¥xf6 gxf6
14.¦ac1 ¥b6 15.e3 h5 16.h4 ¢h8 17.¤e2 ¥g4 18.¤f4 ¦ac8 19.¥h3 ¥xh3
20.¤xh3 £e5 21.¤f4 ¦g8 22.£e2 ¦xg3+ 23.fxg3 ¥xe3+ 24.¢g2 ¥xf4 25.£xe5
¥xe5
The endgame starts with a damaged black pawn structure. 26.b3 ¢g7 27.¦fd1 ¦c7
28.¦c2 ¥d6 29.b4?! [Timman misses the chance 29.¦dc1! c5 30.b4 c4 31.¦d1] 29...¥xb4
30.¦xd5 ¢g6 31.¦d4 a5 32.g4 c5 33.gxh5+ ¢xh5 34.¦d5+ ¢h6 35.¦c4 a4?!
[35...¦e7 offers an active defense.] 36.¢f3 a3 37.¦d6 ¦e7?! Now this move costs a pawn.
38.¦xf6+ ¢g7 39.¦f5 ¦d7 40.¦g5+ ¢f8 41.¦g2! ¦d5 42.¢e4 ¦h5 43.¢f3 ¢e7

44.¢g4 ¦h7 45.¦f2 ¦g7+ 46.¢f5 ¦h7 47.¦f3?! [47.¦h2! ¦h5+ 48.¢g4 prepares the
advance of the h-pawn.] 47...¢f8 48.¦h3 ¦h5+ 49.¢e4 ¢e7 50.¢f4 ¢f6 51.¢g4
¢g6 52.¦f4 f5+ 53.¢f3 ¢f6 54.¢e2 ¢e5 55.¦c4 ¢d5 56.¦f4 ¢e5 57.¦c4 ¢d5
58.¢d3 ¥a5 59.¦h1 ¥d8 60.¦f1 ¥e7 61.¦cf4 The critical position arises after long
maneuvers. Velimirovic exchanges. The result is a dead draw, he thinks. Actually White
gets a new chance. 61...¥xh4? [Correct is 61...¢e5! The critical variation is according to
me 62.¢c4!? ¦xh4! 63.¦xh4 ¥xh4 64.¦f3 f4 65.¦xa3 ¢e4 66.¦h3 ¥g3 67.a4 f3 68.¦h1 f2
and Black escapes.] 62.¦xf5+ ¦xf5 63.¦xf5+ ¢e6 64.¦xc5 The game will be played
over a period of sixteen days. This ending of rook and pawn versus bishop and pawn is
known from Cheron. The continuation is followed with great interest in the Netherlands.
64...¥f6 65.¦c6+ ¢e7 [Or 65...¢f5 ] 66.¢e4 ¥b2 67.¢d5 ¢f7 68.¦e6 If the black
king avoids imprisonment, it is drawn. 68...¢g7?? [Later Timman discovers by means of
Cheron III the line 68...¥f6 69.¢d6 ¥b2 70.¢d7 ¥c3 71.¦e3 ¥b2 72.¦f3+ ¢g6 73.¢e6
¢g5! 74.¦f5+ ¢g4! Black draws.] 69.¢e4! ¢f7 70.¢f5 ¢f8 71.¢g6 ¥c3 72.¦a6 ¥b2
73.¦a7 ¢e8 74.¢f5 ¢f8 75.¢e6 ¢g8 76.¦f7 ¥c3 77.¦f3 ¥b2 The game is
adjourned for the second time. He finds the ending in Cheron I the next morning. White
needs more than fifty moves for the win, according to this book. He starts to shorten the
known analyses with his second Andersson. 78.¢e7 ¢h7 79.¦g3 ¢h6 Forcing the
black king to the h-file is essential. 80.¢d6! ¢h5 81.¢c5 ¢h4 82.¦g8 ¥e5 83.¢d5
¥b2 84.¢c4 ¥f6 [84...¥e5 The bishop goes to another diagonal in the variation 85.¢b3
¥d6 White uses the vulnerability in e.g. 86.¦g6 ¥f8 87.¢c4 ¢h5 88.¦g8 ¥e7 89.¦e8 ¥d6
90.¦a8 ¥e7 91.¢d5 ¢g6 92.¢e6 ¥c5 93.¦a5 ¥b4 94.¦a6 ¢g5 95.¦a8 ¢g6 96.¦a4 ¥f8
97.¦g4+ ¢h5 98.¢f5 ¥c5 99.¦a4 ¢h6 100.¢f6 ¢h7 101.¢f7 ¢h6 102.¦a6+ ¢h5 103.¦a5]
85.¦g6 ¥g5 86.¢d5 ¥c1 87.¢e4 ¥b2 88.¢f5 ¢h5 89.¦d6 ¢h4 90.¦d3 ¥c1
91.¦c3 ¥b2 92.¦e3 ¥c1 93.¦e1 ¥d2 [Timman and Andersson analyze 93...¥b2!
94.¦g1 ¢h3 95.¢f4 ¢h2 96.¦g4 ¢h3 97.¢f3 ¢h2 98.¢f2 ¢h3 99.¦a4 ¥c1 100.¢e2 ¢g3
101.¢d1! ¥b2 102.¢c2 ¢f3 103.¢b3 ¢e3 104.¦xa3] 94.¦h1+ ¢g3 95.¦d1 ¥b4
96.¦d3+ ¢f2 97.¢e4 ¢e2 98.¢d4 ¥c5+ 99.¢c4 ¥e7 100.¦h3 ¥d6 101.¢b3 ¥f8
102.¦h8 ¥d6 103.¦a8 White threatens Rxa3.[The alternative is 103.¦a8 ¢d3 104.¦d8]
1–0
(137) Timman,Jan - Ivanchuk,Vassily [B52]

Timman Amsterdam 1994 (2), 1951
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.¥b5+ ¥d7 4.£e2 ¤f6 5.¥xd7+ £xd7 6.e5 dxe5 7.¤xe5 £e6
8.¤a3 ¤fd7 9.¤ac4 ¤xe5 10.¤xe5 f6 11.¤c4 £xe2+ 12.¢xe2 ¤c6 Little is going
on. 13.c3?! A pawn will go to d3 and become a weakness. 13...e5 14.a4 ¥e7 15.d3 0–0–
0 16.¥e3 b6 17.f3 ¦d7 18.g4 ¦hd8 19.¦hd1 ¥f8 20.h4 ¤e7?! The next advance is
allowed. 21.a5! ¢b7?! [Better is 21...b5 22.¤a3 b4 23.¤c4 ¤d5! (Timman).] 22.axb6 axb6
23.¦a3 ¤d5 24.¦da1 ¥e7 25.h5 g6 26.¦a7+ ¢c6 27.¦xd7 ¦xd7 28.hxg6 hxg6
29.g5 b5 30.gxf6 ¥xf6

[Less favorable is 30...bxc4 31.fxe7 cxd3+ 32.¢xd3 (Timman).] 31.¤a5+ ¢b6 32.¤b3
¤xe3 [The neutral 32...¥e7 is punished by 33.¥xc5+! ¥xc5 34.¦a6+!] 33.¢xe3 White has
an advantage in the center. 33...c4? [Black should have tried 33...¦h7 34.¦g1 ¦h6 35.¤d2!
¢c6 36.¤e4 ¥d8] 34.¦a6+! ¢xa6 35.¤c5+ ¢a5 36.¤xd7 ¥g5+ 37.¢e4 ¥c1
38.dxc4 ¥xb2 [A pawn is lost in 38...bxc4 39.¤xe5 ¢b5 40.¢d4! ¥xb2 41.¤xg6!] 39.c5
[39.¢d3 b4?! 40.cxb4+ ¢xb4 41.c5 ¢b5 42.¢e4 ¢a6 (42...¢c6 43.¤xe5+!) 43.c6 ¢a7
44.¢d5] 39...¥xc3 40.c6 ¢a6 41.¢d5 The c-pawn still has a long way to go. [White
wins with his last pawn in 41.c7 ¢b7 42.¤b6! ¢xc7 43.¤d5+ ¢d6 44.¤xc3 b4 45.¤b1! ¢e6
46.¤d2 g5 47.¤b3 ¢d6 48.¤c1 ¢e6 49.¤d3!] 41...¥a5 [More resistance is offered by
41...¢a7! but 42.¤xe5! wins. See 42...¥xe5 (42...b4 43.¤c4 ¥e1 44.¢d6 ¥g3+ 45.¢d7 ¢b8
46.¤d2 g5 47.¤b3 ¥h2 48.¤c5 ¢a7 49.c7) 43.¢xe5 b4 44.¢e6 b3 45.c7 b2 46.c8£ b1£
47.£c5+ ¢b7 48.¢f6 and White wins the queen ending.] 42.¤c5+! ¢a7 43.¢d6 ¢b8
44.¢d7 g5 45.¤d3! b4?! [Or 45...¥c7 46.¤b4 ¥a5 47.¤d5] 46.¤xb4 e4 47.fxe4 g4
48.¤a6+! ¢a7 49.c7 ¥xc7 50.¤xc7 g3 51.¤b5+ ¢b6 52.¤d4 The knight arrives in
time. 1–0
(138) Timman,Jan - van Reek,Jan

Timman 1st prize Wola Gulowska 1994 (3), 1951

The theme of this study was developed by Timman. I helped him to develop a good
quality study. 1.¥c3 ¥xe5! 2.¥xe5 c3+ 3.¢b1 ¤d3 4.¦xf5 c2+! [4...¥g6! 5.¥h5! ¤xe5
A mutual pin. 6.¢a1!! The king moves sideward. (The try is 6.¢a2? ¥f7+! 7.¢a1 ¤g6! A
double deepen.) 6...¥xh5 7.¦xe5+] 5.¢xc2 ¥g6 6.¥h5! [Not 6.¥c6+? ¢e7 7.¥d6+ ¢xd6
8.¦f6+ ¢c5 9.¦xg6 ¤b4+] 6...¤xe5 A mutual pin. 7.¢c3!! The king moves forwards.
7...¥xh5 8.¦xe5+ White wins the piece. 1–0
(139) Korchnoi,Viktor - Kasparov,Gary [D30]

Kasparov Semifinal London 1983 (1), 1963
[JvR]
Kasparov (1963) plays an accurate endgame. He is the thirteenth world champion. 1.d4 d5
2.c4 e6 3.¤f3 c5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.g3 ¤c6 6.¥g2 ¤f6 7.0–0 ¥e7 8.¥e3 c4 9.¤e5 0–0
10.b3 cxb3 11.£xb3 £b6 12.¦c1 £xb3 13.axb3 ¤b4 14.¤a3 a6 15.¥d2 ¦b8
16.¥xb4 ¥xb4 17.¤d3 ¥d6 18.¤c2 ¥g4 19.¢f1 ¥f5 20.¤c5 ¦fc8 21.¤e3 ¥e6
22.b4 ¢f8 23.¦c2 ¢e7 24.¢e1 h5 25.¦b2 ¦c7 26.¤d3 ¦a8 27.b5 a5 28.b6 ¦c6
29.¦b5 a4 30.¤xd5+ ¤xd5 31.¥xd5 ¥xd5 32.¦xd5 ¦xb6 33.¦xh5 ¦b3 34.¢d2
b5
Black has ample positional compensation for the pawn. 35.h4? White chooses the wrong
strategy. The advance on the kingside goes too slow. [Action in the center starts with 35.e4!
] 35...¦c8 36.g4?! [36.¦g5! g6 37.e4! changes the strategy.] 36...a3 37.f4 ¦cc3 38.¦d5
¢e6 39.¦h5 b4 40.¦a5 ¦xd3+ 41.exd3 ¥xf4+ 42.¢e2 ¦c3! [Korchnoi expected
42...¦b2+ 43.¢f3 ¥d2 44.¢e4 and White will deliver perpetual check.] 43.g5?! [White can
draw by 43.¢f3! ¥d6 44.¢e4 b3 45.¦5xa3 ¥xa3 46.¦xa3 (Kasparov).] 43...¥c1 44.h5 b3!
45.¦5xa3 ¥xa3 46.¦xa3 Black has tactical chances in the rook ending. 46...b2!
47.¦a6+ ¢f5 48.¦b6 ¦c2+ 49.¢e3 ¢xg5 50.d5 ¢xh5 51.¢d4 [51.d6?? ¦c6!] 51...g5
52.¦b8 g4 53.d6 ¦c6 54.¢e5 ¦c5+ 55.¢f6 g3 56.¦xb2 ¦d5 57.¢xf7 ¦xd6 58.¦d2
¢g4 59.d4 ¢f5 60.¢e7 ¦d5 [Great problems are set by 60...¦g6! 61.¦g2! ¢e4 62.¢f7
¦g4 63.¢e6 ¢f3 but 64.¦xg3+! ¦xg3 65.d5 ¢e4 66.d6 ¦g6+ 67.¢e7 ¢e5 68.d7 ¦g7+
69.¢e8 ¢e6 70.d8¤+ achieves the draw.] 61.¦d3 ¢f4 62.¢e6 ¦g5 63.d5? The obvious
move causes defeat. [Correct is 63.¦d1! g2 64.¦g1 ¢e4 65.d5 ¦g6+ 66.¢f7=] 63...¦g6+!
The decision has fallen. [No 63...g2? 64.¦d4+] 64.¢e7 g2 65.¦d1 ¢e5 66.d6 ¦e6+!

67.¢d7 ¦xd6+ 68.¦xd6 g1£ 69.¦e6+ ¢f5 70.¦d6 £a7+ 71.¢d8 ¢e5 72.¦g6
£a5+ 73.¢d7 £a4+ 74.¢e7 £h4+ 75.¢f8 £d8+ 76.¢f7 ¢f5 77.¦h6 £d7+ 0–1
(140) Kasparov,Gary - Karpov,Anatoly [A14]

Kasparov W Ch Sevilla 1987 (2), 1963
[JvR]
1.c4 e6 2.¤f3 ¤f6 3.g3 d5 4.b3 ¥e7 5.¥g2 0–0 6.0–0 b6 7.¥b2 ¥b7 8.e3 ¤bd7
9.¤c3 ¤e4 10.¤e2 a5 11.d3 ¥f6 12.£c2 ¥xb2 13.£xb2 ¤d6 14.cxd5 ¥xd5 15.d4
c5 16.¦fd1 ¦c8 17.¤f4 ¥xf3 18.¥xf3 £e7 19.¦ac1 ¦fd8 20.dxc5 ¤xc5 21.b4
axb4 22.£xb4 £a7 23.a3 ¤f5 24.¦b1 ¦xd1+ 25.¦xd1 £c7 26.¤d3 h6 27.¦c1
¤e7 28.£b5 ¤f5 29.a4 ¤d6 30.£b1 £a7 31.¤e5 ¤xa4 32.¦xc8+ ¤xc8 33.£d1
¤e7 34.£d8+ ¢h7 35.¤xf7 ¤g6 36.£e8 £e7 37.£xa4 £xf7 38.¥e4 ¢g8 39.£b5
¤f8 40.£xb6 £f6 41.£b5 £e7
Will White be able to take the fortress? Encirclement begins. 42.¢g2 g6!? Karpov
enlarges the bastion. If a pawn is admitted to g5, an advance to h5 can start. 43.£a5 £g7
44.£c5 £f7 45.h4 h5?! [Kasparov prefers 45...¢g7 46.g4 Thereafter, white's g- and e-
pawn will advance to the fifth rank.] 46.£c6 £e7 47.¥d3 £f7 48.£d6 ¢g7 49.e4!
¢g8 50.¥c4 ¢g7 51.£e5+ ¢g8 [After 51...£f6 52.£c7+ £f7 53.£xf7+ ¢xf7 54.e5 ¤d7
55.f4 White wins the endgame.] 52.£d6 ¢g7 53.¥b5 ¢g8 54.¥c6 £a7 55.£b4! £c7
56.£b7! £d8 Even the exchange of queens does not save Black. Now White is able to
complete the encirclement. 57.e5! £a5 58.¥e8 £c5 59.£f7+ ¢h8 60.¥a4 £d5+
61.¢h2 £c5 62.¥b3 £c8 63.¥d1 £c5 64.¢g2 Kasparov kept the title of world
champion after an exciting finish of the match.[Kasparov's commentaries end with 64.¢g2
£b4 65.¥f3 £c5 66.¥e4 £b4 67.f3! (not 67.¥xg6?? ¤xg6 68.£xg6 £b7+ 69.¢h2 £g2+!)
67...£d2+ 68.¢h3 £b4 69.¥xg6 ¤xg6 70.£xg6 £xh4+ 71.¢g2!] 1–0

(141) Kasparov,Gary - Karpov,Anatoly [C45]

Kasparov W Ch Lyon 1990 (3), 1963
[JvR]
1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.d4 exd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤xc6 bxc6 6.e5 £e7 7.£e2 ¤d5 8.c4
¤b6 9.¤d2 £e6 10.b3 a5 11.¥b2 ¥b4 12.a3 ¥xd2+ 13.£xd2 d5 14.cxd5 cxd5
15.¦c1 0–0 16.¦xc7 £g6 17.f3 ¥f5 18.g4 ¥b1 19.¥b5 ¦ac8 20.¦xc8 ¦xc8 21.0–0
h5 22.h3 hxg4 23.hxg4 ¥c2 24.£d4 £e6 25.¦f2 ¦c7 26.¦h2 ¤d7 27.b4 axb4
28.axb4 ¤f8 29.¥f1 ¥b3 30.¥d3 ¥c4 31.¥f5 £e7 32.£d2 ¦c6 33.¥d4 ¦a6
34.¥b1 ¦a3 35.¦h3 ¦b3 36.¥c2 £xb4 37.£f2 ¤g6 38.e6 ¦b1+ 39.¥xb1 £xb1+
40.¢h2 fxe6 41.£b2 £xb2+ 42.¥xb2
Black has some material compensation for the material minus. 42...¤f4 43.¦h4 ¤d3!
44.¥c3 e5 45.¢g3 d4 46.¥d2 ¥d5 47.¦h5! White starts with long maneuvers in a
better endgame. 47...¢f7 48.¥a5! ¢e6 49.¦h8 ¤b2 50.¦e8+ ¢d6 51.¥b4+ ¢c6
52.¦c8+ [Not 52.¦xe5?? due to 52...¤d3] 52...¢d7 53.¦c5 ¢e6 54.¦c7 g6 55.¦e7+
¢f6 56.¦d7 ¥a2 57.¦a7 ¥c4 58.¥a5 ¥d3?! [58...¤d3 prevents the next move.] 59.f4!
exf4+? [59...¢e6! keeps the extra pawn.] 60.¢xf4 ¥c2 61.¦a6+ ¢f7 62.¢e5! ¤d3+
63.¢xd4 ¤f2 64.g5 Hereafter, White has to beleaguer a solid fortress. 64...¥f5 65.¥d2
¢e7 66.¢d5 ¤e4 67.¦a7+ ¢e8 68.¥e3 ¤c3+ 69.¢e5 ¢d8 70.¥b6+ ¢e8 71.¦c7
¤e4 72.¥e3 ¤g3 The third time control has passed. White discovers a bishop route to
e5. 73.¥f4 ¤h5 74.¦a7 ¢f8 75.¥h2 ¤g7 76.¥g1 ¤h5 77.¥c5+ ¢g8 78.¢d6 ¢f8
Black has to prevent 79.Ke7. 79.¥d4 ¥g4 80.¥e5! The knight is restricted by the white
bishop. 80...¥f5 81.¦h7 ¢g8 82.¦c7 ¢f8 83.¢c6 ¢g8 84.¦e7 ¢f8 85.¥d6 ¢g8
86.¦e8+ ¢f7 87.¦e7+ ¢g8 88.¥e5 ¢f8 The game is adjourned for the second time.
Kasparov and his team find the important king walk to d8. 89.¦a7 ¥g4 90.¢d6 ¥h3
91.¦a3! ¥g4 92.¦e3! ¥f5 93.¢c7 ¢f7 94.¢d8! Subsequently the king has to move to
e7. 94...¥g4 95.¥b2! ¥e6 96.¥c3! A position of zugzwang has arisen. 96...¥f5 [The
pointe is 96...¤f4 97.¦f3] 97.¦e7+ ¢f8 98.¥e5 ¥d3 99.¦a7 ¥e4 100.¦c7 ¥b1
101.¥d6+ ¢g8 102.¢e7! [102.¢e7 ¤g7 103.¦c8+ ¢h7 104.¥e5 ¥a2 105.¥xg7 White
captures forty-one moves after the last pawn advance.. 105...¢xg7 106.¢d6 Hereafter the
white king moves to f6, and the win becomes elementary.] 1–0

(142) Yermolinsky,Alex - Kasparov,Gary [D85]

Kasparov Wijk aan Zee 1999 (4), 1963
[JvR]
1.¤f3 c5 2.c4 ¤f6 3.¤c3 d5 4.cxd5 ¤xd5 5.d4 ¤xc3 6.bxc3 g6 7.e4 ¥g7 8.¥e3
£a5 9.£d2 ¥g4 10.¦c1 ¥xf3 11.gxf3 e6 12.d5 exd5 13.exd5 ¤d7 14.c4 £b6
15.¥h3 f5 16.0–0 £d6 17.¥f4 ¥e5 18.¦fe1 0–0–0 19.¥xe5 ¤xe5 20.£c3 ¦he8
21.¦e3 £f6 22.f4 ¤d7 23.¥g2 £xc3 24.¦cxc3 ¤f6 25.¥f3 ¦xe3 26.fxe3
White has weaknesses on a2, c4 and e3. 26...¦d6 [The obvious move is 26...¤e8! in order
to blockade with the knight on d6.] 27.¦a3 ¢b8 28.¦b3 ¦a6 29.a3 ¤e8! The right
move is made at last. 30.e4! White needs simplification. 30...fxe4 31.¥xe4 ¤d6?!
Kasparov has difficulties with prophylactic play. [An advantage is gained by 31...¦f6!
32.¦f3 ¤d6 33.¥d3 ¢c7 34.¢f2 a6 35.¢e3 b5] 32.¥d3 ¦a4 33.¦c3 ¢c7 The activity of
rook a4 is deceiving. 34.¢f2? [Best is 34.¥e2! b5 35.cxb5 ¢b6 36.¦h3! White benefits
from the absence of the black rook on the kingside.] 34...b5! The blunder is utilized
tactically. 35.cxb5 ¢b6! Black threatens to capture pawn f4 with check. 36.¢e3 c4
37.¥c2 ¤xb5 38.¥xa4 ¤xc3 White lacks one tempo. 39.¥e8 [39.¥c2 ¢c5 40.d6 ¢xd6
41.f5 g5 42.f6 h5 and Black wins (Hecht).] 39...¢c5 40.d6 ¤d5+ 41.¢e4 ¤f6+ 42.¢e3
[Hecht shows the pointe of the combination 42.¢e5 ¤xe8! 43.d7 ¤d6 44.d8¤! c3 45.¤e6+
¢c4! 46.¤d4 ¤b5] 42...¢xd6 Black has won a pawn. 43.¥f7 ¢c5 44.h4 ¤g4+ 45.¢d2
[Or 45.¢e4 ¤h6! 46.¥e6 ¤f5] 45...¢d4 46.h5 gxh5 47.¥xh5 ¤f6 The two distant
passed pawns cannot be stopped. 0–1

(143) Anand,Viswanathan - Kasparov,Gary [B80]

Kasparov Linares 1999 (5), 1963
[JvR]
1.e4 c5 2.¤f3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.¤xd4 ¤f6 5.¤c3 a6 6.f3 e6 7.¥e3 b5 8.g4 h6 9.£d2
¤bd7 10.0–0–0 ¥b7 11.h4 b4 12.¤b1 d5 13.¥h3 g5 14.hxg5 hxg5 15.exd5 ¤xd5
16.¥xg5 £b6 17.¥g2 ¦xh1 18.¥xh1 ¦c8 19.¦e1 £a5 20.f4 £xa2 21.f5 ¤c5
22.fxe6 ¥g7 23.exf7+ ¢xf7 24.¥xd5+ £xd5 25.¦e7+ ¢g8 26.¦xg7+ ¢xg7
27.¤c3 bxc3 28.¤f5+ ¢f7 29.£xd5+ ¥xd5 30.¤d6+ ¢g6 31.¤xc8 ¢xg5
Black has an extra bishop, but it is a draw if all pawns are exchanged. 32.¤b6 [32.bxc3
¢xg4 33.¤e7 ¥e4 brings no relief.] 32...¥e6! Exchange of the b-pawn brings a king into
the game. 33.bxc3 ¢xg4 34.¢b2 ¢f4 35.¢a3 a5 [35...¢e5 36.¢b4 ¢d6 37.¢a5 ¢c6
38.¤a4] 36.¤a4 Black has to avoid the exchange of knights. 36...¤e4? The knight goes to
the wrong square. [Correct is 36...¤d7! 37.¤b2 ¤b6 38.c4 (38.¤d3+ ¢e3 39.¤c5 ¥d5
40.¤b3 ¤c4+) 38...¥xc4! 39.¤xc4 ¤xc4+ 40.¢b3 ¤e5 41.¢a4 ¤c6 (Kasparov).] 37.¤b2
The defense of the c-pawns has no importance. 37...¤xc3 38.¤d3+ ¢e3 39.¤c5 ¥f5
[No win brings 39...¥d5 40.¤b3 ¥xb3 41.cxb3 ¢d4 42.b4 a4 43.b5 ¢c5 44.b6 (Kasparov).]
40.¢b2! The knight is chased for the first time. Square b3 remains open for the white
knight. 40...¤d5 41.¤b7 a4 42.c4! The knight is attacked for the second time. The
protection of the a-pawn becomes a problem. 42...¤b6 43.¤d6 The other knight wins a
tempo. 43...¥d3 [43...¥d7 44.c5 ¤d5 45.¤c4+ ¢d4 46.¤b6 also draws.] 44.c5! The knight
has to jump for the third time. 44...¤d5 45.¢a3 ¥c2 46.¤b5! ¤e7 Black stops the c-
pawn. 47.¤a7? Anand has defended brilliantly until this moment. [47.¤c3! ¢d4 48.¤xa4
¢c4 49.¤b6+ ¢xc5 50.¤d7+ White has achieved a theoretical draw.] 47...¢d4 48.c6 ¤d5
49.¤b5+ [Or 49.¢b2 ¥d1 50.¤b5+ ¢c4 51.c7 ¥g4] 49...¢c5 50.c7 ¥f5! Black wins
although he abandons the a-pawn.[The tactical justification gives 50...¥f5 51.¢xa4
(51.¤a7 ¤xc7 52.¢xa4 ¢b6) 51...¤b6+ 52.¢a5 ¤c4+ 53.¢a6 (53.¢a4 ¥c2#) 53...¥c8+
54.¢a7 ¢xb5 55.¢b8 ¤d6] 0–1

(144) Khalifman,Alexander - Salov,Valery [E14]

Salov Cand. match Wijk aan Zee 1994 (1), 1964
[JvR]
Salov (1964) loves the endgame. He wants to create and utilize weaknesses. 1.d4 ¤f6
2.¤f3 e6 3.e3 b6 4.¥d3 ¥b7 5.0–0 d5 6.c4 dxc4 7.¥xc4 a6 8.£e2 ¤bd7 9.¦d1 c5
10.a4 ¥d6 11.¤c3 0–0 12.b3 cxd4 13.exd4 ¦e8 14.¤e5 ¤d5 15.¥b2 £c7
16.¤xd7 £xd7 17.¥xd5 ¥xd5 18.¤xd5 exd5 19.£d3 b5 20.axb5 £xb5 21.£xb5
axb5 22.¦xa8 ¦xa8 23.¦a1 ¦xa1+ 24.¥xa1
Black has the good bishop. 24...h5 25.h3 [25.f3 is fine too.] 25...¢h7 26.¢f1 ¢g6
27.¢e2 [27.¥c3! prevents the restriction of the bishop.] 27...b4! 28.g3! ¢f5 [Wrong is
28...h4 29.¢f3 hxg3 30.fxg3 ¢f5 31.¥b2 ¥xg3? 32.¢xg3 ¢e4 33.¥c1 ¢d3 34.¢f4 ¢c2
35.¢e5 ¢xc1 36.¢xd5 ¢c2 37.¢c4 f5 38.d5 f4 39.¢d4 and White wins (Salov).] 29.¥b2
g5 White has an escape. 30.¥c1? [Correct is 30.¢d3! g4 (30...h4 31.g4+ ¢f4?? 32.¢e2! f5
33.¥c1+ ¢e4 34.¥e3) 31.h4! (Salov).] 30...g4 31.hxg4+ ¢xg4! 32.¥d2 f5 33.¥e1 ¥e7
34.¥d2 ¥d6 35.¥e1 f4 36.f3+ [Or 36.gxf4 ¢xf4 37.f3 ¥e7] 36...¢h3! 37.gxf4 ¢g2
38.f5 ¥e7! 39.f6 ¥xf6 40.¥xb4 h4 41.¥d6 h3 42.b4 ¥e7! Salov ends the game
elegantly. 0–1
(145) Timman,Jan - Salov,Valery [D20]

Salov Quater fin. Sanghi Nagar 1994 (2), 1964
[JvR]
1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e4 ¤f6 4.e5 ¤d5 5.¥xc4 ¤b6 6.¥d3 ¤c6 7.¥e3 ¤b4 8.¥e4
f5 9.exf6 exf6 10.¤c3 f5 11.¥b1 ¤4d5 12.¤f3 ¥d6 13.¥g5 £d7 14.£e2+ £e6
15.¤e5 0–0 16.0–0 ¤xc3 17.bxc3 ¥xe5 18.dxe5 £c6 19.¥d3 ¥e6 20.¦ac1 h6
21.¥e3 f4 22.¥d4 ¥c4 23.¥xc4+ £xc4 24.¦fe1 ¦ae8 25.e6 £xe2 26.¦xe2 The
passed pawn looks threatening. Black has to reorganize his position. 26...¤c4! 27.f3 b6
28.¦d1 ¦f5 29.¥f2?! White allows an unfavorable exchange. [29.¦de1 overprotects the
important pawn.] 29...¦e5! 30.¦xe5 ¤xe5 31.¦d4 g5 32.¦e4 ¤d3?! The passed pawn
cannot be won easily. [32...¤g6! 33.g3 c5 introduces a serious threat (Salov).] 33.¥d4!
¢h7 34.c4! ¢g6 35.g3 fxg3 36.hxg3 ¢f5? [36...¤b4 brings the knight back into the

own camp.] 37.e7 [37.a3! springs a nasty surprise. White gains a plus in 37...¢g6 38.¦e3
¤c5 39.¥xc5 bxc5 40.¦e5] 37...¢g6 38.¦e6+ ¢f7 39.¦xh6 ¦xe7 40.¦h7+ ¢e6
41.¦xe7+ ¢xe7 The exchanges have led to an almost equal position. 42.¢f1! c5!
43.¥c3 ¢e6 44.¥d2 ¤e5 45.¢e2 g4!
Black keeps a plus. [He avoids 45...¢f5? 46.¥xg5!] 46.fxg4 ¤xc4 47.¥c1 ¤e5 48.g5 b5
49.¢d2 ¢f5 50.¢c3 ¢e4 51.¢c2 a5 Correct prophylaxis is needed in order to stop the
avalanche of pawns. 52.¥d2? [Correct is 52.¢c3! b4+ (52...a4 53.a3) 53.¢b3 ¢f5 54.¢a4
and Black cannot make progress.] 52...a4 53.a3 ¢d4 54.¥c3+ ¢d5 55.¢b2 [55.¥d2
¢c4! 56.¥f4 ¤g6 and the b-pawn will advance.] 55...¢e6 56.¢a2 ¢f5 57.¥d2 ¤c4
58.¥c1?! [Timman analyses 58.¥e1! ¤d6! 59.¥d2 ¤e4 60.¥e3 b4 61.axb4 cxb4 62.¥c1
¤d6 63.¢b2 ¤c4+ 64.¢c2! The king escapes from imprisonment.] 58...b4! 59.axb4 cxb4
60.¢b1 b3 61.¢a1 Before Timman went to India, I had warned him for the behaviour of
the boa-constrictor. He got into a strangulation nevertheless. The adjourned position was
analyzed in the Netherlands with great interest. 61...¢g6 Boa has sealed a quiet move.
62.¢b1 ¢f7! 63.¢a1 ¢g7! 64.¢b1 ¢g6 The exchange of moves increases the
difficulties for White. 65.¢a1 [Salov analyses the variation 65.g4? ¤e5 66.¥a3 ¢xg5
67.¥e7+ ¢xg4 68.¢b2 ¤c4+ 69.¢c3 ¢f5! 70.¥f8 ¢f6! Probably Black wins by supporting
the pawns from behind with the king.] 65...¤e5 This position was discussed by Hans Ree
and Gert Ligterink in the Dutch press. 66.¥a3? The pawn sacrifice is wrong. [Correct is
66.¢b1! ¤d3 67.¥d2 a3 68.¢a1! (Valery and Jan investigate 68.g4 ¤e5 69.¥c3 ¤c4! 70.¥f6
¤d2+ 71.¢a1 ¤e4! This position gave Timman a sleepless night. Later Goldsteen found the
move 72.¥c3!! Promising seems 72...¢xg5 73.¥b4 a2 74.¢b2 ¢xg4 75.¥f8 ¢f3 76.¥g7
¤d2 77.¥c3 ¢e2 78.¥g7 ¢d3 but 79.¥c3! is okay.) 68...a2 69.g4 ¤e5 70.¥c3 ¤c4 71.¥f6
draws more easily.] 66...¢xg5 67.¥e7+ ¢f5 68.g4+ [More resistance is offered by
68.¢b2! ¢e6!! 69.¥f8 ¢f7 70.¥h6! ¤c4+ 71.¢c3 b2 72.¢c2 a3 73.¢b1 ¢g6 74.¥f4 ¢f5
75.¥h6 ¢e4 76.¢a2 ¢d3! (Salov).] 68...¢e6 69.¥f8 ¢f7 Salov and Timman had chosen
for participation in the FIDE-cycle. They despised the break of Kasparov and Short with
FIDE in 1993.[The pointe is 69...¢f7 70.¥c5 ¤d3 71.¥a3 ¢f6! Black wins the last white
pawn and the game.] 0–1

(146) Kramnik,Vladimir - Ivanchuk,Vassily [D21]

Kramnik Dortmund 1995 (1), 1975
[JvR]
Vladimir Kramnik (1975) plays all aspects of the game with virtuosity. His greatest
expertise lies in the endgame. 1.¤f3 d5 2.d4 e6 3.c4 dxc4 4.£a4+ ¤c6 5.£xc4 ¤f6
6.¥g5 h6 7.¥xf6 £xf6 8.¤c3 ¥d6 9.g3 0–0 10.¥g2 ¥d7 11.0–0 ¦fd8 12.¦ac1
£e7 13.¤e4 ¥e8 14.e3 ¦ac8 15.¦fd1 a6 16.¤c5 ¥xc5 17.£xc5 £xc5 18.¦xc5
¤e7 White pieces exert pressure in different ways. 19.¤e5 ¤d5?! [19...b6 20.¦cc1 f6
21.¤d3 c6 chases pieces away and creates a solid wall.] 20.a3 f6? This move should have
been prepared. 21.¥h3!
A weakness comes under fire. 21...fxe5!? [Even worse would be 21...¦d6? 22.¤c4; or
21...¥f7? 22.¤xf7 ¢xf7 23.e4 ¤e7 24.d5 (Kramnik).] 22.¥xe6+ ¥f7 23.¥xc8 ¦xc8
24.dxe5 Black has two minor pieces for a rook and two pawns. 24...¤b6 25.¦d4 ¥e6
26.f4 ¢f7 27.e4 g6 28.¢f2 ¢e7 29.¦c1!? a5!? 30.¦c5 a4 31.¦b4 ¥d7 32.¦c1 ¥c6
33.¢e3 ¤d7 [33...¥d7 is answered by 34.g4! ¥xg4 35.f5! gxf5 36.¢f4 and the restriction
of the kingside has ended.] 34.¦bc4 ¦b8 35.h4!? h5! 36.¦g1 ¦h8 37.¦c2 ¢e6
38.¦gc1 ¤b8 39.¦c5 ¢e7 40.¦1c2 ¤d7? [Correct is 40...¦f8 (Kramnik).] 41.¦xc6! The
position is opened by a sacrifice. 41...bxc6 42.¦xc6 ¦b8 43.¦xg6 ¦xb2 The pawns in
the central area are ready for an attack. 44.f5! Naturally this is not a real sacrifice.
44...¦b3+ 45.¢f4! ¦xa3 46.¦g7+ ¢e8 47.e6 ¤f6 48.g4! Again White plays a
magnificent move. Sacrificing a pawn is even better than capturing a pawn. Black is able to
capture the heroic pawn in two manners. [Avoids 48.e5? ¤d5+ 49.¢e4 ¤c3+=] 48...¦a1
[The pointes are 48...hxg4 49.¢e5; 48...¤xg4 49.e5; and 48...¦h3 49.g5 ¦xh4+ 50.¢f3
(Kramnik).] 49.e5 ¤d5+ 50.¢e4 Vladimir played a wonderful endgame.[50.¢e4 ¤c3+
51.¢d4 ¤b5+ 52.¢c4 and White wins easily (Kramnik).] 1–0

(147) Kramnik,Vladimir - Illescas Cordoba,Miguel [A17]

Kramnik Dos Hermanas 1997 (2), 1975
[JvR]
1.¤f3 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤c3 ¥b4 4.£c2 0–0 5.a3 ¥xc3 6.£xc3 b6 7.g3 ¥b7 8.¥g2 c5
9.b4 d6 10.0–0 ¤bd7 11.¥b2 £e7 12.d3 ¦fc8 13.b5 a6 14.a4 axb5 15.axb5 £f8
16.e4 ¦xa1 17.¦xa1 ¦a8 18.£c1 ¦xa1 19.£xa1 £a8 20.£xa8+ ¥xa8 White has
slight positional advantages like the pair of bishops. The game really starts for Kramnik.
21.¤d2! The knight goes on its way to threaten the weakness b6. 21...¤e8 22.¤b1!
¥b7 23.f4 f6? The center pawns are weakened. 24.¤c3 ¢f7 25.¤a4 ¢e7 26.d4 ¢d8
27.d5 exd5 Black may not lose a tempo. 28.exd5 ¤c7 29.¥h3 ¤a8! White threatened
30.Bxd7. Black has protected the weakness b6 in time. 30.¥e6 ¤f8 31.f5 The weakness
e6 has been used by White. 31...¥c8 32.¢f2 ¥d7 33.g4 ¢e7 34.g5!
A breakthrough starts on the kingside. Black is in zugzwang nearly. 34...¤xe6 35.fxe6

¥e8! 36.gxf6+ gxf6 37.¢e3 ¥g6 This bishop has moved to a favorable square in five
moves. 38.¢d2!? The white king defends the queenside temporarily. 38...¥e4 39.¥c1
¥g2 40.¢c3 ¥f1 41.¥h6 ¥g2 42.¥f4 ¥f1 43.¤b2 ¤c7 44.¤d1 ¥g2 45.¤e3 The
knight takes over the protection of c4. 45...¥e4 46.¥h6 ¤e8 47.¢d2 Is Black able to
activate his knight? 47...¤c7 [The natural 47...f5? fails due to 48.¥g5+ ¢f8 (48...¤f6 leads
to a fatal pin) 49.¥d8] 48.¢e2 ¤e8 49.¢f2 ¤c7 50.¢g3 ¥d3 51.¢g4! ¤e8 52.¢f4
¥b1 [52...¥e2 53.¢e4! leads to zugzwang.] 53.¤f5+ ¢d8 [A witty line is 53...¥xf5?
54.¢xf5 ¤c7 55.¥g7 ¤e8 56.¥h8!] 54.¥f8 ¥d3 55.¥e7+! ¢c7 56.¤e3 ¢c8 57.¢g4
¢c7 58.¢h5 ¤g7+ 59.¢h6 ¤e8 [No good is 59...¤f5+? 60.¤xf5 ¥xf5 61.¢g7 ¥d3
62.¢f7 ¥xc4 63.¥d8+!] 60.h4 ¢c8 61.h5 ¢c7 62.¤g2! ¢c8 The black bishop has to
protect h7. 63.¤f4 ¥c2 All preparations have been made. 64.¥xf6? He sacrifices the
wrong piece! [Right is 64.¤g6! hxg6 65.hxg6 ¥d3 66.g7 ¤xg7 67.¢xg7 ¥xc4 68.¥xd6
¥xb5 69.¢f8 and White wins (Kramnik).] 64...¤xf6 65.¢g7 ¤e8+ 66.¢f7 ¤c7
[66...¢d8? 67.e7+ ¢d7 68.¤e6 ¥d1 69.¤f8+ ¢c8 70.h6! ¥h5+ 71.¢g8 ¤f6+ 72.¢h8 and
White wins with great difficulties.] 67.e7 h6 68.¤e6! ¥d1! 69.¢g6 ¤e8 70.¤f8 ¥e2
71.¢xh6 ¥xc4 72.¢g6 The battle rages on. 72...¥xd5?! [Probably Black draws in
72...¥d3+ 73.¢f7 c4 74.¢xe8 c3 75.¢f7 ¥xb5 76.h6 c2 77.h7 c1£ 78.h8£ £f4+ 79.£f6
¥e8+ (Kramnik).] 73.h6 c4? The last chance is missed. [73...¤c7! 74.¤e6! ¥xe6 75.h7 ¢d7

76.h8£ ¢xe7 Black has a fortress. I do not find a win for White.] 74.h7 ¥e4+ 75.¢f7
¥xh7 76.¢xe8 ¥g8 77.¤d7! c3 Black overstepped the time limit in a lost position. It
has been a great battle.[77...c3 78.¢f8 and White wins.] 1–0
(148) Kasparov,Gary - Kramnik,Vladimir [C67]

Kramnik BGN W Ch London 2000 (3), 12.10.1975
[JvR]
When Kramnik played with Black against Kasparov in the world title match, he had to
avoid Gary's opening preparation. 1.e4 e5 2.¤f3 ¤c6 3.¥b5 ¤f6 4.0–0 ¤xe4 5.d4
¤d6 6.¥xc6 dxc6 7.dxe5 ¤f5 8.£xd8+ ¢xd8 The Berlin Defense was renamed
'Berlin Wall' during this match. White seems to have a great advantage but it appears to be
hard to make any progress. 9.¤c3 ¥d7 10.b3 h6 11.¥b2 ¢c8 12.¦ad1 [Kasparov
played 12.h3 in the first game and achieved little.] 12...b6!? Vladimir diverts from Shirov-
Krasenkov, Polanica Zdroj 2000. 13.¤e2! c5 14.c4 ¥c6 15.¤f4 ¢b7! [Kramnik avoids
15...¥xf3 16.gxf3 after a long thought due to passivity.] 16.¤d5! ¤e7! 17.¦fe1 ¦g8!
Black starts a remarkable development of the king's rook. The planned route to the open
d-file is h8-g8-g6-e6-e8-d8. 18.¤f4! The knight returns in order to prepare e5-e6.
18...g5 19.¤h5 ¦g6!? Kramnik has planned ..Re6. Kasparov prevents this move. 20.¤f6
¥g7 21.¦d3 ¥xf3!? Two exchanges lessen the pressure. 22.¦xf3 ¥xf6 23.exf6 ¤c6
24.¦d3 ¦f8! 25.¦e4 [25.¦d7 ¢c8 shows the point of black's prophylactic move.]
25...¢c8 26.f4 gxf4 27.¦xf4 ¦e8
[Black draws quickly with 27...¤b4! 28.¦e3 ¦d8! (threatens ..Nd3) 29.¦ff3 (29.¦e7? ¦d2!
30.¦f2 ¦xf2 31.¢xf2 ¤d3+) 29...¦d1+ 30.¦f1 ¦d2 31.¦f2] 28.¥c3 ¦e2 29.¦f2 ¦e4
30.¦h3!? Kasparov wants to win. [30.¦fd2 ¤d4 followed by exchanges draws.] 30...a5
31.¦h5!? a4 32.bxa4?! ¦xc4 33.¥d2 ¦xa4 34.¦xh6 ¦g8?! [Kramnik can make an
attempt to win, but he misses 34...¦xh6! 35.¥xh6 c4 36.g4 c3 37.h3 ¦b4] 35.¦h7 ¦xa2!
36.¦xf7 ¤e5! 37.¦g7 ¦f8 38.h3 c4 [Even stronger is 38...¤d3! 39.f7 ¢d7! 40.¦g8 ¦a1+
41.¢h2 ¤xf2 42.¦xf8 ¢e7] 39.¦e7 [Kramnik prefers 39.¥c3 ¦xf2 40.¢xf2 but 40...¤d7
draws in that case.] 39...¤d3 40.f7 ¤xf2! [The second Lautier worried about 40...¢d8??
41.¦e8+ ¦xe8 42.¥g5+ but his boss pays attention and safely reached the time control
after forty moves in two hours.] 41.¦e8+ ¢d7 42.¦xf8 ¢e7 43.¦c8 ¢xf7 44.¦xc7+

¢e6 45.¥e3! ¤d1! 46.¥xb6 [Not 46.¦xc4? ¦xg2+ 47.¢xg2?? ¤xe3+] 46...c3 47.h4 ¦a6
48.¥d4 ¦a4 49.¥xc3 ¤xc3 50.¦xc3 ¦xh4 51.¦f3 ¦h5 52.¢f2 ¦g5 53.¦f8 ¢e5
White goes forwards and his opponent centralizes. Kramnik was successful with his
prophylactic strategy. He drew with Black anytime. The results were even better with
White.[53...¢e5 54.¢f3 ¦f5+ 55.¦xf5+ ¢xf5 is elementary.] ½–½
(149) Topalov,Veselin - Kramnik,Vladimir [A17]

Kramnik Dortmund 2001 (4), 12.07.1975
[JvR]
1.¤f3 ¤f6 2.c4 e6 3.¤c3 ¥b4 4.£b3 c5 5.g3 ¤c6 6.a3 ¥a5 7.¥g2 0–0 8.0–0 d5
9.d3 h6 10.¥f4 ¦e8 11.¤a4 b6 12.¤e5 ¥d7 13.e3 g5 14.¤xc6 ¥xc6 15.¥e5 ¤g4
16.¥c3 ¥xc3 17.¤xc3 dxc4 18.dxc4 ¥xg2 19.¢xg2 £e7 20.¤e4 f5 21.h3 ¤e5
22.£c3 ¤d7 23.¤d2 ¦ad8 24.¦ad1 ¤f6 25.¤f3 ¦xd1 26.¦xd1 Nothing seems to
happen. 26...e5! Suddenly the pin ..Qb7 threatens. White has no convincing answer.
27.£c2? [The players dislike 27.¤g1! £b7+ 28.¢h2 ¢f7 but 29.f3! e4 30.f4 creates a
defensive screen.] 27...e4! 28.¤g1?! [Better is 28.¤e1 ] 28...¦d8 29.¤e2 ¦xd1 30.£xd1
£d7 31.£xd7 ¤xd7
Black controls more area. Furthermore the pawns c4 and h3 are weak. 32.b3 The
weakness of c4 transfers to b3. 32...¤e5 33.¤c3 ¢f7 34.g4!? Otherwise the weaknesses
of b3, f2 and h3 will become fatal. [Kramnik analyses 34.¤b5 a5! 35.a4 ¤f3 36.¤d6+ ¢e6
37.¤c8 ¤d2 38.¤xb6 ¤xb3 and Black has a great advantage.] 34...fxg4 35.hxg4 ¤xg4
36.¤xe4 ¢e6 37.¤c3 ¤e5 The distant passed pawn decides the knight ending, like it
did in Lasker-Nimzowitsch, Zuerich 1934. 38.f4!? [More prudent is 38.¢g3 ¤c6 39.¤e4
¢e5 40.f3! ¤e7 41.¢g2 ¤f5 42.¢f2 but 42...g4! 43.¤c3 h5 advances the distant passed
pawn.] 38...gxf4 39.exf4 ¤c6 40.¤b5 h5! The passed pawn becomes a real danger.
41.¢g3 a5 42.¤c7+ ¢f5 43.¤d5 ¤d4 44.¢h4 White wants to exchange. 44...¤xb3
45.¢xh5 ¤d2 46.¤xb6 ¢xf4 47.¤a4 ¤e4 Vladimir has scored a wonderful positional
win. Naturally the opponent seems to reach a lost position.[Topalov notices 47...¤e4
48.¢g6 ¢e5 49.¢f7 ¢d4 50.¢e6 ¢xc4 51.¢e5 ¢b3 52.¤b6 ¤d2 Black has won a pawn.
Sufficient material has remained for a win.] 0–1

(150) Kramnik,Vladimir - Bareev,Evgeny [B19]

Kramnik Wijk aan Zee 2003 (5), 14.01.1975
[JvR]
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.¤c3 dxe4 4.¤xe4 ¥f5 5.¤g3 ¥g6 6.h4 h6 7.¤f3 ¤d7 8.h5 ¥h7
9.¥d3 ¥xd3 10.£xd3 ¤gf6 11.¥f4 e6 12.0–0–0 ¥e7 13.¤e4 ¤xe4 14.£xe4 ¤f6
15.£d3 £d5 16.c4 £e4 17.£xe4 ¤xe4 No player has an advantage in a known
position. 18.¥e3 ¤d6!? Bareev starts a counterattack before he castles. 19.b3 ¥f6 20.g4
The first new move, according to Kramnik. He wants to gain territory. 20...b5! Black
counters. 21.¤d2 [The advance 21.c5!? weakens square d5.] 21...¢d7 22.¢c2 ¥d8?! The
bishop has no use on the queenside. [More useful is 22...¦hd8 23.f4 ¢e8] 23.¤f3! ¥f6!?
Bareev changes his mind. 24.¤e5+ ¢c7 25.c5!? [More natural looks 25.¥f4 ¥xe5
(Kramnik) 26.¥xe5! f6 27.¥f4 ¢d7 28.¢d3] 25...¥xe5 26.dxe5 ¤c8 The knight is on its
way to d5. 27.¦h3! ¤e7 28.¦f3 ¦hf8 29.¦d6! a5 30.g5!
The attack on the kingside begins. 30...hxg5 [The immediate 30...¤f5?! allows the
positional sacrifice 31.gxh6 gxh6 32.¦xf5! exf5 33.¦xh6! ¦h8 34.¦f6 (Kramnik).] 31.¥xg5
¤f5! The knight has to control h6. Pawn f7 needs indirect protection. Black has lost the
struggle for the d-file, because the knight cannot go to d5 and square d8 cannot be
occupied by a rook. 32.¦d1 a4 33.b4 Black has to look for counter-play, if he wants to
survive. 33...¢c8? Black becomes completely passive. [The counterattack 33...¦h8!
34.¦fd3 ¦af8! develops the rooks and attacks a pawn. 35.¦d7+ ¢b8! White has not a
decisive attack (Lukacs).] 34.¦fd3 ¦a7 35.¦d8+ ¦xd8 36.¦xd8+ ¢b7 37.¢c3 ¢a6
38.¢d3! ¦c7 39.¢e4 ¢b7 40.¦d1 ¢c8 41.¦d8+ ¢b7 42.¢f4! ¦c8 43.¦d7+ ¦c7
44.¦d3 ¢c8 [Black repeats the moves because 44...¦c8 fails due to 45.¥d8] 45.¦d8+
¢b7 An unexpected decision occurs. 46.¥f6!! White brings a magnificent sacrifice. He
threatens with the continuation 47.Bxg7. 46...g6 [46...gxf6 47.exf6 ¦c8 48.¦xc8 ¢xc8
49.¢g5! ¢d7 50.h6 ¤xh6 51.¢xh6 e5 52.¢h7! and White wins the tempo play (Kramnik):
52...e4 53.¢g7 ¢e6 54.a3] 47.hxg6 fxg6 48.¢g5 Kramnik plays a perfect combination of
combinatory struggle and subtle prophylaxis. 1–0

150 Chess Endings Part. 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

150 Chess Endings Part. 3

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

150 Chess Endings Part. 3

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What are some of the great innovators in endgame play mentioned in the text and their contributions?

What are some of the great innovators in endgame play mentioned in the text and their contributions?

What details are provided about Tigran Petrosian's playing style?

What details are provided about Tigran Petrosian's playing style?

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 by Jan van Reek

The games diverts from the usual order in two ways:

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 1

(102) Fischer,Bobby - Petrosian,Tigran [C12]

(103) Petrosian,Tigran - Geller,Efim [D34]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 2

(104) Petrosian,Tigran - Bertok,Mario [E85]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 3

(105) Petrosian,Tigran - Botvinnik,Mikhail [D94]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 4

(106) Botvinnik,Mikhail - Petrosian,Tigran [D31]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 5

(107) Petrosian,Tigran - Botvinnik,Mikhail [E19]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 6

(108) Korchnoi,Viktor - Livshin,Iosif [D12]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 7

(109) Matanovic,Aleksandar - Korchnoi,Viktor [C08]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 8

(110) Korchnoi,Viktor - Karpov,Anatoly [A46]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 9

(111) Karpov,Anatoly - Korchnoi,Viktor [C82]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 10

(112) Korchnoi,Viktor - Karpov,Anatoly [D36]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 11

(113) Tal,Mikhail - Taimanov,Mark [B43]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 12

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 13

(114) Botvinnik,Mikhail - Tal,Mikhail [E81]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 14

(115) Smyslov,Vasily - Tal,Mikhail [A36]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 15

(116) Keres,Paul - Portisch,Lajos [C93]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 16

(117) Hort,Vlastimil - Portisch,Lajos [E14]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 17

(118) Salov,Valery - Portisch,Lajos [A11]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 18

(119) Gligoric,Svetozar - Spassky,Boris [C64]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 19

(120) Spassky,Boris - Petrosian,Tigran [C11]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 20

(121) Spassky,Boris - Byrne,Robert [B52]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 21

(122) Taimanov,Mark - Fischer,Bobby [E51]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 22

(123) Fischer,Bobby - Reshevsky,Samuel [B90]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 23

(124) Fischer,Bobby - Taimanov,Mark [B47]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 24

(125) Fischer,Bobby - Larsen,Bent [B88]

(126) Petrosian,Tigran - Fischer,Bobby [A06]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 25

(127) Spassky,Boris - Fischer,Bobby [B46]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 26

(128) Huebner,Robert - Spassky,Boris [C67]

CHESS ENDINGS PART 3 http://www.scribd.com/elvuelodelcondor 27