Clases de Ajedrez Dvoretsky43
Clases de Ajedrez Dvoretsky43
Clases de Ajedrez Dvoretsky43
Lilienthal - Keres
Leningrad/Moscow 1941
The Instructor
Mark Dvoretsky 1. d2-d4 Ng8-f6 2. c2-c4 e7-e6 3. Ng1-f3 b7-b6 4. g2-g3 Bc8-b7 5. Bf1-g2 Bf8-e7
6. 0-0 0-0 7. Nb1-c3 Nf6-e4 8. Qd1-c2 Ne4xc3 9. Qc2xc3 Bb7-e4
Black forestalls the move Qc3-c2. His intent is to continue with c7-c6 and d7-d5,
without walling in the bishop. The loss of tempo involved in the exchange of bishops
plays no substantive role.
10. Nf3-e1
Lilienthal suggests an idea here which does not appear in "ECO": 10. Bh3!? f5 11.
Nd2 Bb7 12. Re1, preparing e2-e4. But in his opinion, as well as that of
contemporary theory, the strongest move is 10. Bf4.
12. d4-d5?!
12... c6xd5
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 2 of 11
In the 6th match game Korchnoi – Huebner (Solingen 1973), Black equalized by
playing 12...Bf6 13. Qd2 ed 14. cd cd 15. Qxd5 (15. Nf4 d4) 15...Nc6 16. Rd1 Qe7
17. Ne3 Rfd8 18. Rb1 Qe6 19. b3 Ne7 20. Qf3 Rac8 21. Ba3 d6. White should
probably have retreated his queen elsewhere: 13. Qf3!?, after which the double
capture at d5 has less of a point, in view of 15. Nf4.
13...ed is bad, of course, because of 14. Nf4, when White recovers the pawn with the
better position, because of the weakness at d7. Now on 14. d6, Black does not
answer 14...Bxd6? because of 15. Qd3 with a double attack, but 14...Bf6.
14...Rc8 was possible too, but White must retreat the queen anyway, since the
endgame resulting from an exchange would not be good for him.
Up to this point, our game follows the 13th Euwe - Keres Match Game (Holland,
1939/40); Keres continued 15...e5, when Euwe sacrificed a pawn by 16. d6, without
obtaining compensation. Of course, the sacrifice was unnecessary: either 16. Nd3 or
16. Ng2 would have been good. Black would reply 16...d6, and if 17. e4 e5 retaining
an excellent position – White has real difficulty developing his queen's bishop.
Fine thought the pawn sacrifice correct - except that after 16. d6 Bxd6, White should
not have continued 17. Nh5? Be7! 18. Be3 Qc6, with great advantage to Black, but
17. Nd5!, with outstanding compensation.
But is this true? Of course, after the passive 17...Nc7 18. Rd1 Nxd5 19. Qxd5 Bc7
(19...Bc5 20. Qxe5 Re8 21. Qh5, with some advantage) 20. Bg5!, White's initiative
is dangerous enough; but Black could play something a lot more energetic: 17...Qc2!
18. Ne3 (18. e4 Nc5 is very good for Black) 18...Qg6 19. Nf5 Re8 20. e4 Bf8, when
all Black's affairs are in order. All of this means he was right to play 15...e5.
With this move, Keres hampers the development of the queen's bishop, and
strengthens Black's play considerably.
16. e2-e4
16...e6-e5?!
The correct continuation was 16...Nc5!, and if 17. e5 d6 liquidates White's pawn
center. Fine adds the moves 18. ed Bxd6 19. de fe!, believing that Black would have
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 3 of 11
the initiative. Let's extend his variation: 20. Qd1!? Qxd1 21. Rxd1 Be5! 22. Rb1
Rad8, and the endgame is about even.
We may conclude that Black obtained an excellent position from the opening, as a
result of the overhasty advance 12. d5!?
17. Nf4-d3
Not 17. Nh5, in view of 17...f5!, when the knight has no retreat squares.
On 17. Ng2 (intending 18. Ne3), Black has either the same reply: 17...f5, or else
17...Nc5.
17...f7-f6?
On 17...d6 18. Ne1 Qc8, White would prevent f7-f5 by means of 19. g4. However,
17...Nc5, to simplify the position was worth considering. Fine gives the continuation
18. Nxe5 Bf6 19. Bf4! Bxe5 20. Bxe5 Rfe8 21. Bd4! (21. Rac1? Qd3!) 21...Qxe4
(the American GM also gives 21...Rxe4 22. Bxc5 bc 23. Rac1 Qe2 =, but on 23.
Rfc1! Qe2 24. Qxe2 Rxe2 25. Rxc5 Rxb2 26. Rc7, Black still has an unpleasant
endgame to defend) 22. Qxe4 Nxe4 23. Rac1 Rac8, when White has the preferable
position.
18. Nd3-e1!
White's task is to drive away the queen and get his queenside pieces into the game.
Not only driving off the queen, but also parrying the threatened 19...Nc5. If 19...Qd4
20. Nc2.
20...Be7-c5
With the unmistakable aim of exchanging the knight when it gets to e3.
Keres probably did not yet sense the strategic dangers of his position. Otherwise, he
would probably have made a violent attempt to change the course of the game by
20...f5!? 21. ef Bf6 22. Qe2 e4 23. Rb1 Nb4. Of course, it's hardly possible to
evaluate the consequences of such a desperate action over the board. If the variations
don't work out, Black could very well wind up with a shattered position.
21...Ba3 was worth considering. White would have replied 22. Nh4, intending Qg4
and Nf5.
22. Be3xc5
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 4 of 11
22...Qa5xc5
Here Botvinnik thought Black should have played 22...bc, closing the c-file. After 23.
Ne3 d6 24. Nc4 Qd8 "Black practically equalizes". But I think that 25. Qf5! would
have placed Black in a difficult position. If 25...Re8, then 26. f4! And 25...Nc7 26. f4
g6 27. Qg4 favors White too.
Besides, instead of Botvinnik's 24. Nc4, it would be more exact to play 24. Qf5,
threatening 25. Qe6+ or 25. Nc4 followed by 26. f4.
Fine also examines 22...Nxc5 23. Ne3! Qb4 24. Nf5! Kh8 (24...Nxe4 loses to 25.
Qg4 g6 26. a3!) 25. Rfe1 a5 26. Re3, when White's advantage is obvious.
Black loses the exchange after 24...Qe7 25. Nf5 Qf7 26. Nd6. He should have played
24...Rfd8 instead, in order to keep his rooks connected.
Referring to that knight on a6, Fine comments in the well-known words of Siegbert
Tarrasch:
And he provides this English translation (it's inaccurate, but it keeps the meter):
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 5 of 11
Attempting to prevent the doubling of rooks (29. Rfc1 would now be met by
29...Qxc1+)
31. h2-h4!
31...Qb4-f8
White is happy to exchange rooks. As we shall see, this simplifies the task of
invasion.
32. Nc4-e3 Rc8xc2 33. Rc1xc2 Rd8-c8 34. Rc2xc8 Qf8xc8 35. Qe2-f3 Kh8-g7
As Fine pointed out, 36...Qd8 was a little more stubborn, but it wouldn't have
changed the assessment of the position: 37. h5! d6 38. Qe3! g5 39. h6+ Kf7 40. Qf3,
etc.
37. h4-h5!
Threatening 38. h6+ with the win of the f6-pawn, thus forcing Black's reply.
37...g6xh5
This new switch from one side of the board to the other is the quickest route to
victory.
40...Nb8-a6
Black's knight re-enters the game, but too late. Tearing into the enemy position, the
White queen snaps up the queenside pawns.
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 6 of 11
Even simpler than 42. Nxd6. The queen on the seventh plus the knight at f5 bind
Black hand and foot.
Lilienthal - Dubinin
XII USSR Championship, Moscow 1940
1. d2-d4 Ng8-f6 2. c2-c4 e7-e6 3. Ng1-f3 b7-b6 4. g2-g3 Bc8-b7 5. Bf1-g2 Bf8-b4+
6. Bc1-d2 Qd8-e7 7. 0-0 Bb4xd2
8. Qd1xd2
More energetic than 8. Nbxd2. The queen's knight will be better developed at c3.
10. c4xd5
10...Nf6xd5
Black did not wish to recapture on d5 with the pawn, so as not to be left with the
"bad" bishop. However, this would also have given him the half-open e-file and a
strongpoint on e4, and thus sufficient counterplay.
11. Nc3xd5
Another good idea was 11. Rac1 Na6 12. Ne5, for example:
12...Rfd8 13. Nxd5 ed 14. e3!+ (14. Nc6? Bxc6 15. Rxc6 Nb4 is weaker: not only is
the rook attacked, but also the a2-pawn; or 14. Nd3?! c5 15. dc bc 16. e3 d4, with a
small edge to White [Sosonko - Hecht, Malta Olympiad 1980]);
12...c5 13. dc Nxc5 14. Nxd5 ed 15. Nf3 Ne6 16. e3, also with a small advantage
[Tukmakov - Reshevsky, Vilnius 1978].
11...Bb7xd5
Not wishing to have this bishop "butting into" the d5-pawn, Black gets himself in
trouble. By now, he should have been thinking about 11...ed, followed by c7-c6 and
Nb8-d7.
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 7 of 11
12. Nf3-e5!
Obviously, White is going to "press" along the c-file, so the rook move looks natural.
However, it would have been better to have held off on the exchanges, and even to
have ceded White the open lines, in order to exchange off the c7-pawn. After 13...c5
14. dc Qxc5 15. f4 Na6, White of course has the advantage, but it will be quite
difficult to realize. For example, 16. Rac1 (16. Nd7 Qc6+ and 17...Rfd8) 16...Qb4
17. Qxb4 Nxb4 18. a3 Nd5 19. Kf3 Rfc8 20. e4 Nf6, and Black can defend.
The endgame after 21. g4 Kf8 22 g5. Ne8 23. h4 is still unpleasant for Black.
Additionally, White could very well exchange queens somewhat differently: 17.
Qc2!? Nc5 18. a3 Qe4+ 19. Qxe4 Nxe4 20. Rc7.
14. Rf1-c1
Now the weakness of the c-pawn will make itself felt. 14...c5 is now bad in view of
15. dc Rxc5 16. Rxc5 Qxc5 17. Rc1.
The intermediate move 15...f6 (instead of 15...Rxc5) is decisively refuted by 16. cb!
Rxc1 17. Rxc1 fe 18. Rc8+ Kf7 19. Rc7.
14...f7-f6
A move which pursues three aims at once: long-term prevention of c6-c5, creating
pressure on the e6-pawn, and the possibility of exploiting the e-file pin by d4-d5.
The pawn is in fact not won here and it's not clear, therefore, whether 18. d5 is worth
playing; Black actually has two defenses:
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 8 of 11
de c4 21. Nc5 Qd6 is unconvincing. On the other hand, 19. d6! Qxd6 20. Nxc5 bc
21. Rd2!? keeps White's advantage.
B) 18...Qd6!? 19. Qxe6+ (19. de Nf8 20. Nf4 Re8) 19... Qxe6 20. de Nf8 21. Nb4
(21. Rac1 c5) 21...c5 22. Nd5 Rb7, and White's advantage is small.
And now White threatened 19. Qe4, which would cost Black the c6-pawn. This too is
not completely accurate: the pawn could be saved (by 19...f5, for instance), although
only at the cost of serious positional concessions.
19. Qe3-f4!
Black hopes to save himself in a heavy-pieces endgame. After 20...fe 21. Qe4 Rac8
22. b4! c5 23. bc bc 24. Rc4, he would be totally helpless.
Perhaps it would have been better to withhold this check for a while, and play 22.
Qe4.
I think that Lilienthal actually came to the correct decision intuitively. For on 22.
Qe4?! Rac8 23. Rc3 Qd4!, it is not likely that he could then have occupied the vital
d-file.
23...h7-h6
Now the c6-c5 advance would have played into White's hands, handing over the
important d5-square for the use of his pieces. The "airhole" h7-h6 is necessary
anyway, as otherwise Black will find himself hampered by the weakness of the e5-
and c6-pawns.
24. Qc4-e4 Ra8-c8 25. Rc3-d3 Qd6-e6 26. Rc1-d1 Rc7-e7 27. b2-b3
This cold-blooded continuation leaves the opponent no chances. In view of the threat
to the c6-pawn (after 28. Rd6), Black must play c6-c5 (a move which until recently
he was himself striving to play), and surrender the d5-square to White.
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 9 of 11
However, 27. a4!? looks more straightforward, creating the same threat; the
weakening of the b3-square hardly counts here. Evidently, White still had not
foreseen the next stage of the plan of strengthening his position. And this is normal:
very rarely are plans created whole, from beginning to end. Usually, the player will
find one stage after the other; only later, in our eyes, do his actions fall together into
a unified plan.
27...Rc8-f8 28. Rd3-d6 Qe6-f7 29. f2-f3 c6-c5 30. Rd1-d5 Rf8-e8
Black must defend not only the e5-pawn, but the 7th rank as well.
31. Rd5-d3
33. Rd7 R6e7 34. Qb7 would be premature, in view of 34...e4! 35. fe Rf8 36. Rf3
Rxd7 37. Rxf7 Rfxf7. With two rooks for the queen, Black should not lose.
The last few moves were made to gain time. Black can undertake nothing, and must
await developments.
In his turn, White seeks the most favorable moment for the push a4-a5-a6.
There is no joy in 37...ba 38. Rxc5 Rb6 39. Rxa5 Rxb3 40. Rxb3 Rxb3 41. Rxa7,
when Black is a pawn down, and without a defense against White's many threats.
In strategically difficult situations, sometimes the best practical chance lies in a well-
timed attempt to change the character of the struggle. In this case, that would be:
38...e4!? 39. Re5 (39. Rxe4 Rxe4 40. fe Kh7) 39...Qf7 40. Rxe6 Rxe6. On the other
hand, this too would leave Black with a difficult position. I recommend comparing
this episode with my commentary to Black's 20th move in the earlier game Lilienthal
- Keres.
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 10 of 11
39. a5-a6
White threatened 42. Rd7 Re7 43. Qb7. Debatable – if you compare it with the
commentary on move 33, the pawn's advance to a6 hardly changes anything about
the variation given there. On the other hand, this means little, since there is in fact no
good advice for Black here: individual moves can't change anything now.
Since further exchanges are unavoidable, White brings up his king first. This is the
principle of "Never be in a hurry, when you have an advantage to exploit!" Before
changing the character of the position, first make every useful move you can – even
if it's only a minimal improvement.
A more normal course - 46...Rxd8 47. Rxd8+ Kh7 48. Qxf7 Rxf7 49. Rb8, followed
by the approach of the king - would have been hopeless for Black. So he makes a
desperate attempt to complicate. (Note that the situation is now less favorable than it
would have been on move 38.)
47. Rd8xe8+ Re7xe8 48. Rd3-d7 Qf7xc4 49. b3xc4 e4xf3 50. Kf2xf3!
Much stronger than 5. ef. Marching the king over to the queenside quickly decides
matters.
50...Re8-a8
53...Ra8-e8 54. Rd7xa7 Re8xe2 55. Ra7-d7 Re2xh2 56. a6-a7 Rh2-a2 57. Kc6-b7
According to Lilienthal's book, the game ended here. The computer database,
however, gives a few more completely unnecessary moves: 57...Kf6 58. a8Q Rxa8
59. Kxa8 h5 60. Kb7 g5 61. Kxb6 Kf5 62. Kxc5 Kg4 63. Rg7, and Black resigned.
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004
Page 11 of 11
file://C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\7LUAGN8G.htm 4/9/2004