Shreya Family
Shreya Family
Shreya Family
Faculty of Law
B.A.LLB. (Hons.)
Family Law-II Assignment
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my thanks to the people who have helped me most throughout my
project. I am grateful to my teacher, Professor Dr. Kahkashan Y. Daniyal for her guidance
and constant supervision as well as for providing necessary information regarding the project
& also for their support in completing the project.
A special thank of mine goes to my colleagues and every other person who have willingly
helped me out with their abilities; who helped me out in completing the project, where they
all exchanged their own interesting ideas, thoughts and made this possible to complete my
project with all accurate information. I wish to thank my parents for their personal support or
attention who inspired me to go my own way.
3
INDEX
1. Introduction
2. Who is Hindu? From where the term Hindu has been derived?
3. What is marriage under Hindu law?
4. Nature of Marriage
5. Forms of Marriage
6. Ceremonies
7. Valid Marriage
8. Void Marriage
9. Voidable Marriage
10.Conclusion
11.Bibliography
4
INTRODUCTION
All the laws of our India were divided into two parts i.e. personal law and territorial law. In
personal law all the law related to family affairs, i.e. divorce, marriage, succession etc comes
and in territorial or country law all the laws which are within the territory of our India except
the family affairs they all come into this.1
What is family and why we need this?
The term family is derived from the Latin word i.e. “ familia” which means a group of people.
So, when two or more people comes together and form some specific kind of relationship in
between them like husband and wife and started sharing common ancestors then that will be
referred as a family.
Family is one of the most important thing for every individual , as family is needed for the pro
creation of the social status as well as to share our emotions and feelings with them because it
is not possible to share each and everything with others like relative, friends etc .
Types of family: -
1. Patriarchal family: - In this the authorities lies mainly on the hand of male member i.e.
on the hand of the father.
2. Matriarchal family: - In this the authorities lies mainly on the hand of female member
.i.e. on the hand of the mother.
3. Patrilocal family: - In this the family lives in the house of the male member. I.e. in the
house of the father.
4. Matrilocal family: - In this the family lives in the house of the female member. I.e. in
the house of the mother.
5. Patrilineal family: - In this the inheritance were traced out from the side of male
member. i.e. from the side of the father
6. Matrilineal family: - In this the inheritance were traced out from the side of female
member. I.e. from the side of the mother.
7. Joint family: - In this more than two generation of people live together in one roof
sharing common economic, social and religious regulations it can be from any side i.e. either
from paternal line or maternal line.
8. Nuclear family: - In this two or less than two generation of people live together in one
roof and sharing common economic, social and religious regulations. I.e. father, mother and
their children.
1
http://www.timesofindia.com
5
Who is Hindu? From where the term Hindu has been derived?
The term Hindu is derived from the Greek word i.e. “Indoi”. The Greek used to call the
inhabitance of Indus valley as Indoi.
All the person will consider as a Hindu if they were falling under the below points: -
1. “Any child, legitimate or illegitimate, both of whose parents are Hindus, Buddhists,
Jains or Sikhs by religion;
2. Any child, legitimate or illegitimate, one of whose parents is a Hindu, Buddhist, jain or
Sikh by religion and who is brought up as a member of the tribe, community, group or family
to which such parent belongs or belonged;2 and 3
3. Any person who is a converts or re-convert to Hindu, Buddhist, Jain or Sikh religion”.
2
http://www.timesofindia.com
3
http://www.wikipedia.org
6
Krishnamurthy vs. Syamanthakamani(AIR 1977) : -In this the court said that, the person who
has withdraw the spouse from the society he/she has only has to face the burden of proving and
give the reasonable excuse to the court that why he/she has done that.
Parbia Ram vs. Thopali 3: - In this case the court said that, the parties were not legally married
or the marriage was not subsisting at the time of the petition, so the question of granting
restitution of conjugal rights does not arise.
Ranjan Vinod Kumar KujIwal vs. V.K. Kujiwal4: -In this the court said that, the wife itself
said that her marriage was not valid in the eyes of law so the question of granting a decree of
restitution of conjugal rights was not maintainable.
Judicial separation: -
Section 10 of the Hindu marriage act 1955, talks about the judicial separation, and it simply
means suspension of conjugal rights for some time. I.e. one year.
Section 10(1) of the Hindu marriage act 1955, said that whether the marriage of the party was
solemnized before or after this act, may present the decree of judicial separation on any ground
which were specified under sub-section (1) of section 13, and in case of wife they can also file
under any ground which were specified under sub-section (2) of the section 13.
Shyam chand vs. janki : - In this case husband claim for judicial separation on the ground of
desertion but all the evidence which was shown to the court from that basis court came to the
conclusion that husband has the malafide intension for filing the case that is why court did
not grant the judicial separation. 4
Shankuntala vs. Om prakash : - In this case court said that for filing the case of judicial
separation or divorce there must be the entire gap of two years before preceding the date of the
case.
Marriage being one of the essential Samskaras is sacramental in nature. The sacramental
nature of marriage has three characteristics:
Since Hindu marriage was considered to be sacrament, the consent of the parties did not
occupy any important place. Thus the person married may be a minor or even of unsound
mind, if the marriage is duly solemnized there is valid marriage.
Under the Contract Act, the contract of a minor or of a person of unsound mind is void.
Further, Section 12 of Hindu Marriage Act does lay down that a marriage is voidable if
4
http://www.netlawman.co.in
5 1966 AIR 644,1966 SCR (1)430
consent is obtained by fraud or force, but it is not laid down that if one’s consent was not
obtained the marriage is voidable. This shows that despite the fact that a party is able to prove
the absence of consenting mind, the marriage will continue to remain valid.
The modern concept of marriage is contractual in nature. It receives the ideals of liberty and
equality (free volition of individuals). Today, it is an established notion of the west that
marriage, to be effective, must be an agreement voluntarily entered into by both parties.
In the light of modern concept of marriage could we say that Hindu marriage continues to be
sacrament? By recognising the divorce and widow remarriage the first two characteristics of
sacramental marriage have been waived. However, the third characteristic is still retained.
To sum up the Hindu marriage has not remained a sacrament and has also not become a
contract, but it has a semblance of both.
Forms of Marriage
The ancient Hindu law recognised three forms of Shastric marriages as regular and valid.
These were Brahma (bride given gift by father), Gandharva (mutual agreement of bride and
bridegroom) and Asura(bride virtually sold by the father). The first and the third are arranged
marriage whereas the second one is love marriage.7
Forms of marriages in modern Hindu law: The Hindu marriage Act, 1955, does not specially
provide for any forms of marriage. The Act calls marriage solemnized under the Act as Hindu
marriage which may be performed in accordance with shastric rites and ceremonies or in
accordance with the customary ceremonies prevalent in the community to which bride or
bridegroom belongs. However, it does not mean that a marriage cannot take any of the
aforesaid forms now. Marriage can still be entered into in anyone of the three forms.
Looking at from another aspect in Hindu society there are mainly two forms of marriages:
arranged marriages and love marriages. Most Hindu5 marriages are still arranged marriages.
An arranged marriage may be either in the form of Brahma marriage or in the form
of Asura marriage. Among the Sudras, the Asura form of marriage is very common. Among
the high-class Hindus, the Brahma form of marriage is common. The Gandharva form of
marriage is fast becoming popular among the younger generation.8
Ceremonies
Marriage among Hindus being a religious and sacred tie, performance of certain ceremonies
is still necessary for a valid marriage. There were three important stages wherein certain
ceremonies were to be performed. They were:
7
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/paragraphs/marriage-meaning-definition-and-forms-of-marriage/31312
8 http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/hindu/traditional-forms-of-hindu-marriage-in-india/4377
8
Customary ceremonies may not include any one of the Shastric ceremonies including
Saptapadi. It may be totally non-religious ceremony or it may be very simple ceremony. For
instance, among santhals smearing of vermilion by bridegroom on the forehead of the bride is
the only essential ceremony.
Necessary ceremonies, shastric or customary, whichever are prevalent on the side of the bride
or bridegroom, must be performed otherwise marriage will not be valid. No one can innovate
new ceremonies and a marriage performed with the innovated ceremonies and rites is invalid.
Hindu Marriage Act allows inter-caste marriages. But marriage between a Hindu and a Non-
Hindu is not permissible under Hindu Marriage Act and such a marriage if performed in
India, will be invalid. But foreign country such marriage is valid. Such marriage is also valid
in India, if performed under the Special Marriage Act, 1954.10
A marriage may be solemnised between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are
fulfilled, namely:–
(b) Though capable of giving a valid consent, has been suffering from mental disorder
of such a kind or to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and the procreation of
children; or
3. The bridegroom has completed the age of twenty one (21) years and the bride the age
of eighteen years at the time of marriage.
4. The parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the custom or
usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two;
5. The parties are not sapindas of each other, unless the custom or usage governing each
of them permits of a marriage between the two.6
9. http://ijlljs.in/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Ceremony_and_Valid_Marriage_among_the_Hindus-A_Dichotomy.pdf
10.https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/hindumarriage/7.php?Title=Hindu%20Marriage%20Act,%201955&STitle=Ceremonies%20for%
20a%20Hindu%20marriage
9
Void marriage: -
Section 11 of the Hindu marriage act talks about the void marriage, and according to this act
the marriage will be consider as void if the following below points gets infringed: -
1. “Neither party has a spouse living at the time of marriage. [sec. 5 (i)].
2. The parties are not sapindas. [sec.5 (ii)].
3. The parties are not within degree of prohibited relationship. [sec. (iv)].”
Umashankar vs. Radhadevi8 and in Trilochand vs. Om Prakash - Court said that second wife
can file a suit for perpetual injunction restraining the husband from contracting a second
marriage, under sec 9 of C.P.C read with section 54 of specific Relief Act,1963.
M .M Malhotra vs. Union Of India10: - In this case court said that, if the first marriage of the
man was in the subsistence, then he can go for the second marriage and that second marriage
will consider as valid.11
Voidable marriage: -
section 12 of the Hindu marriage act, 1955 talks about voidable marriage, the term voidable
marriage means in this “ one of the party can be avoided the option of one of the parties of the
marriage. It remains valid for all practical purpose until and unless its validity is questioned”.
Section 12(1) (b) says that “any marriage shall be voidable and may be annulled if the marriage
is in contravention of the condition specified in section 5 (ii) of the act.”
Shewanti vs. Babrao (AIR 1971): - In this court said that, incapacity owing to congenital
deformities to beget/conceive children would not amount to impotency.127
Babai Panmato vs. R.A. singh (AIR 1968): - In this case due to the misrepresentation of the
fact fact 16 year old girl marry with 60 year old man by under the believe that he was 25 year
old so in this court grant the divorce because the consent of the girl was taken fraudly.
CONCLUSION: -
Hindu marriage is considered as a sacramental. According to the Manu, “husband and wife
are united to each other not merely in this life but even after the death, in the other world. The
rule is that, once is a maiden given in marriage. A true wife must preserve her chastity as much
after as before her husband’s death.”
Hindu marriage act, 1955 do not prescribed any specific form of marriage it just simply lays
down some criteria for a valid marriage. All the conditions and criteria which were mentioned
under the old Hindu law were considered as very strict in nature. But after the commencement
of the Hindu marriage act 1955 it modifies all the conditions and criteria of the old law and
also make the law more liberalized. According to the new law, it gave the permission for
marrying in different caste and community and it also abolished all the restrictions which were
made on inter-caste, sagotra, inter-sub-caste and sapravara marriages. According to the new
11. https://www.shoneekapoor.com/void-marriage/
12. https://www.vakilno1.com/legalviews/void-marriage-nullity-of-marriage.html
10
law, any two different sex person who were Hindu by religion and fulfilling all the term and
conditions of this act then they can do the marriage.
Thus, the new act of 1955 modifies the old Hindu law of marriage and makes the procedure
and performance of the marriage more easier and this is the welcomed changed which is
happily accepted by the present society.
______________________________________________________________
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Primary Sources:
1. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
2. The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006
3. The Constitution of India, 1950
Secondary Sources:
I. Books:
• Paras Diwan, Family Law of Marriage and Divorce in India, Allahabad Law agency
• Mulla, Principles of Hindu law; Butterworth co.
• Diwan Paras, Modern Hindu Law, Allahabad Law Agency, Faridabad
• Subba Rao, G.C.V., Family Law in India, S. Gogia and Co.
II. Articles
https://www.vakilno1.com/legalviews/void-marriage-nullity-of-marriage.html
https://www.shoneekapoor.com/void-marriage/
http://ijlljs.in/wp-
content/uploads/2015/04/Ceremony_and_Valid_Marriage_among_the_Hindus-
A_Dichotomy.pdf
https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/hindumarriage/7.php?Title=Hindu
%20Marriage%20Act,%201955&STitle=Ceremonies%20for%20a%20Hindu%20marria
ge
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/paragraphs/marriage-meaning-definition-and-
forms-of-marriage/31312
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/hindu/traditional-forms-of-hindu-marriage-in-
india/4377