Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Abt Des

Download as xls, pdf, or txt
Download as xls, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 83

Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.

335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report


Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

INPUT DATA

1 HYDRAULOGICAL DATA
High Flood Level (HFL) = 346.235 m
Low Bed Level (LBL) = 342.370 m
Design discharge in cumecs (Q) = 288 m3/sec
Vertical Clearance = 0.900 m
Afflux = 0.05 m
Freeboard = 0.950 m
Type of Soil (Hard Rock/Rock/Soil) = Soil
Silt Factor (from Soil) = 1.000
Mean Velocity of Water (Vm) (at 0.000 Chainage of River) = 1.274 m/sec

2 SUPERSTRUCTURE
Super Structure Details are addopted from Standard Drawing = 24 m RCC T BEAM
Grade of Concrete(Superstructure) = 30 (M)
skew angle = 0 ˚
Finished Road Level (FRL) = 350.288 m
Level at bottom of girder (Bearing level) = 347.785 m
Thickness of bituminous concrete wearing coat = 0.065 m
Thickness of cement concrete wearing coat 0.075 m
Unit weight of wearing course(RCC concrete) = 25 kN/m3
Effective span (c/c of bearing/cross girder/abutment) (Le) = 24.0 m
No. of Span = 3 no
Length between Expansion Gap center to center = 24.700 m
Expansion gap between Dirt wall inner face to Deck edge = 0.040 m
Expansion gap between Dirt wall outer face to Approach Slab = 0.020 m
Total length of bridge between Inner face of Dirt wall ( L total ) = 74.140 m

=
Distance between center line of Cross Girder & Deck Edge 0.330 m
Length of Approach Slab = 3.500 m
Thickness of Approach Slab = 0.300 m
Total Length of Bridge with Approach Slab = 81.980 m
Total width (W) = 16.000 m
Carriageway width = 11.000 m
Provision of Footpath = yes Area of footpath
Width of Footpath = 1.500 m 0.36
Width of Kerb (bk) = 0.500 m
Width of Crash Barrier (bc) = 0.500 m
Ht. of Kerb (hk) = 0.225 m
Ht. of Crash Barrier (hc) = 0.900 m
Area of Crash Barrier = 0.330 m2
Depth of Girder (Including Deck Slab) at mid point = 2.438
Depth of Girder (Excluding Deck Slab) = 2.051 m
Thickness of deck slab at end = 0.250 m
Thickness of deck slab at mid point = 0.388 m
Length of Cantilever portion of deck slab = 0.180 m

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

Camber in deck slab = 2.5 % (both side camber)


Unit weight of RCC = 25 kN/m3
Grade of Steel = 500 (Fe)

3 GIRDER DETAILS
No. of Longitudinal Girder = 5 no
No. of Cross Girder in one span = 3 no
Length of Centre line of bearing to Girder End = 0.330
Total Longitudinal Girder length end to end in one Span = 24.66
Length of the straight part of the Girder at support = 1.0 m
Length of the varying part of the Girder = 1.2 m
Length of the middle part = 20.26 m
Distance between center line of Longituding Girder = 2.900 m
Ht of Rectangle portion in Bulb = 0.25 m
Width of Rectangle portion in Bulb = 0.625 m
Ht of Trapizoidal portion in Bulb = 0.15 m
Thickness of Web of Longitudinal Girder = 0.325 m
Ht. of cross Girder = 1.650 m
Thickness of cross Girder = 0.300 m
Thickness of cross Girder(at end) = 0.300 m
Cross Sectional Area of Deck with Girder at mid portion = 8.876 m2
Cross Sectional Area of Deck with Girder at end portion = 11.317 m2
C.G. Distance of Girder Section (with Deck) from Bottom of Girder = 1.642 m
Total Dead Load of Super Structure on Pier = 6075.822 kN
Total Dead Load of Super Structure on Abutment = 3037.911 kN

4 SUBSTRUCTURE & FOUNDATION


Grade of Concrete(Substructure & Foundation) = 30 (M)
Young's modulus of Concrete, Ecm = 31000 N/mm2
(From table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page no. 38)
Reinforcement
Grade of steel = 500 (Fe 500)
No of Abutment = 2 no
No of Pier = 2 no
FOR ABUTMENT
Type of Foundation = Open foundation
Existing Ground Level (EGL) at A1 = 346.090 5.151
Existing Ground Level (EGL) at A2 = 345.788 4.849
Top of rock level = 0.000 m
Maximum Scour Level = 343.019 m Rock level
Depending on Soil type Minimum Depth of Foundation below EGL = 2.000 m (Ref :IRC 78,pg = 15,16)
Bottom of Foundation/Pile Cap at Abutment Location = 340.939 m 340.988
Depth of Foundation at Abutment from Lowest EGL = 4.849 m OK
Abutment Shaft
Thickness of Abutment Wall at top = 1.000 m
Thickness of Abutment Wall at bottom 1.200 m
Avg. Thickness of Abutment Wall = 1.100 m
Length of Abutment Wall (sq dimension= 16.0 m) = 16.000 m
Abutment Cap

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)
Length of Abutment Cap (considering sq. dim.= 16.0 m) = 16.000 m
Width of Abutment cap = 1.250 m
Distance between CL of bearing & face of abt cap = 0.500 m
Height of Abutment cap trapezoidal Portion = 0.000 m
Height of Abutment cap rectangular Portion = 1.000 m
Dirt Wall & Return Wall
Thickness of Dirt Wall = 0.400 m
Length of Dirt Wall = 16.000 m
Length of Return Wall = 4.000 m
Thickness of Return Wall at Edge = 0.300 m
Thickness of Return Wall at Face = 0.700 m
Abutment Foundation
Foundation Shape (Rectangle/Tappered) = Tappered
Total Width of Abutment Foundation = 7.100 m FRL-BTFS=
Width of Abutment Foundation at Toe Side = 2.200 m 75%=
Width of Abutment Foundation at Hill Side = 3.700 m
Length of Abutment Foundation = 16.100 m
Thickness of Abutment Foundation at Abutment Face = 1.200 m
Thickness of Abutment Foundation at Edge = 0.600 m
Area of Tappered Foundation = 6.750 m2
Area of Rectangular Foundation = 0.000 m2
C.G of Trapizoidal part of Foundation from foundation bottom = 0.956 m
C.G of Rectangular part of Foundation from foundaion bottom = 0.300 m
C.G of Foundation = 0.538 m
Allowable Base Pressure at Founding Lvl. = 350 kN/m2
Pile and pile cap/Foundation Details :-
Diameter of piles = = 0.000 m
Height of pile cap/foundation slab = = 1.200 m
Length of pile cap/foundation slab = = 16.100 m
Width of pile cap/foundation slab = = 7.100 m

5
DETAILS OF BEARING AND ARRESTER BLOCK
Bearing Type ( Elastomeric/ Rocker-Roller/ Pot cum PTFE ) = Elastomeric
Bearing on Abutment ( Elastomeric/ Rocker-Roller/ Pot PTFE/Pot-Po = Elastomeric
No. of Bearing at Abutment 5 no
No. of Bearing at Pier 10 no
Height of Bearing at C/L of slab = 0.096
Hight of Pedestal below centre Bearing = 0.150
a)
For Elastomeric Bearing
Length of Bearing (along road width ) = 0.56 m
Width of Bearing (along bridge length) = 0.38 m
Height of Bearing = 0.096 m
Maximum Height of Pedestal at Bearing side = 0.15 m
Length Width

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)
M X M
6 M X M
SEISMIC ZONE
Seismic Zone = III
Importance Factor = 1.2

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

Coefficient of linear Thermal Expansion = 0.0000117


Shrinkage Cofeeicient = 2.00E-04

From IRC:5 (Page - 16,Clause -106.2.1)

Design Discharge Minimum Clearance


(m3/sec) (mm)
0.3 to 3 450
3 to 30 600
30 to 300 900
300 to 3000 1200
above 3000 1500

RCC T BEAM
From IRC:6 (Page - 23,Clause - 211)

Live Load For Calculations


Effective Span (M) 24.000 3 Lane IRC CLASS A 1 Lane 70R WHEEL

IMPACT FACTOR 0.15 0.15


Multiplying Factor 1.15 1.15

From IRC:6 (Page - 51,Table- 5,Clause - 222.5)


ZONE
ZONE NO. FACT
OR

Type of Bridge
II 0.10
III 0.16 Normal Bridges
IV 0.24 Important Bridges
V 0.36 Large Critical Bridges
rea of footpath
m2
Wind Calculation:

Basic Wind speed = 39 m/s


considering basic wind speed 33 m/s,

Bridge Situated in
Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstruction
H (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

both side camber) 10 27.8 463.7 17.8 190.5


15 29.2 512.5 19.6 230.5
20 30.3 550.6 21 265.3
30 31.4 590.2 22.8 312.2
50 33.1 569.2 24.9 370.4
60 33.6 676.3 25.6 392.9
70 34 693.6 26.2 412.8

80 34.4 711.2 26.9 433.3


90 34.9 729 27.5 454.2
100 35.3 747 28.2 475.6
H = avg. Height from Ground/water lev.
Vz = Hourly mean speed of wind at Ht. H
Pz = Horizontal wind mean speed of wind at Ht. H

Height of the superstructure = 10.249 m ~ 10.000


so,

Bridge Situated in
Plain Terrain Terrain with Obstruction
H (m) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2) Vz (m/s) Pz (N/m2)
10 32.85 647.65 21.04 266.07

Super Structure:
Gust Factor = 2.00

Deck Type = deck supported by plate girder Slab Bridge


2011, page no. 38) no. of girder = more than two Deck supported by beam or box girder
b= 24.00 m
d= 2.05 m
c= 2.90 m Deck supported by plate girder
b/d = 11.70

Drag Coefficient = 1.95


Excavati Drag Coefficient = 1.3
on

342.590
IRC 78,pg = 15,16) 311.823 -1.651
309.523

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)
###

Tharmal Calculation:

Thermal co-efficient of RCC (α) = 1.20E-05


Temperature variation at our location of bridge = 42.50
9.349 = t/2 21.25
7.012
So, movement of deck due to temperature variation = L.α.t 0.006
= 5.61

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

per degree centegrade

oad For Calculations Crowd Load


1 Lane 70R WHEEL 1 Lane 70R TRACKED Footpath LL(kN/m2)

0.15 0.100 4.000


1.15 1.100

Importance Factor for Bridges


1.0
1.2
1.5

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)

no of beam b/d Value od CD

>=10 1.1
single 2 1.5
>=6 1.3
two or more 1.95
single 2.2
two or more 2.1

d/b CD for pier t/b ratio of


1 2 4 6 10 20 40
<= 0.25 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1
< 0.5 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2 2.2
< .67 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2 2.2
<1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.8 2
< 1.5 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.7
<2 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
<3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1
>=4 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 1
square or Octagonal 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4
12 side POLYGON 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 1 1.1 1.3
circle with smooth surface 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
Design Calculation For Bridge over Hardiya River at Chainage 32.335 Km of Draft Detailed Project Report
Road Dumka to Hansdiha upto Bihar Border(SH-17)
circle with rough surface 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.9 1 1.2

/8 C (Clause 215.4, IRC:6-2010, page-42)


/8C (Fig. 8&9, IRC:6-2010, pages-39,40)
/8C

m
mm

Clint:SHAJ
Consultant:CETEST-SNBAPL JV Govt. of Jharkhand
ANALYSIS OF ABUTMENT
Basic design data:-

a) Superstructure:-
Formation level = 350.288 m
R.L. of carriageway at end long girder = 350.150 m
Overall length of Bridge= 74.940 m
Span ( c/c of expansion joint) = 24.700 m
Distance between C/L of bearing to C/L of exp. joint = 0.350 m
Effective span (C/C of bearing) = 24.000 m
Clear carraige way width = 11.000 m
Depth of girder+deck slab at CL of carraigeway = 2.438 m
Thickness of Bituminus concrete Wearing Coat = 0.065 m
Thickness of cement concrete Wearing Coat = 0.075 m
b) Sub-structure :-
Bearing and pedestal :
Level of bearings = 347.785 m.
Thickness of bearing = 0.096 m
Thickness of pedestal = 0.150 m
Maximum ht of bearing + pedestal = 0.246 m
c) Abutment cap :
Top of abutment Cap = 347.539 m
Bottom of Abutment cap = 346.539 m
Length of abutment Cap = 16.000 m
Thickness of abutment cap= 1 m
Width of abutment cap at top (including dirt wall part) = 1.250 m
Width of abutment cap at bottom = 1.250 m
abutment shaft :
Total length of abutment shaft = 16.00 m
Thickness of abutment wall = 1.200 m
Height of abutment wall = 4.400 m
Height of frame at abutment location = 5.646 m
Dirt wall :
Thikcness of Dirt wall = 0.400 m
Height of Dirt wall = 2.680 m
Length of dirt wall = 16.000 m
Return wall :
Width of Return wall = (avg.) 0.500 m
Length of return wall = 4.000 m
Height of return wall = 8.221 m
Foundation and foundation Slab :
Thickness of foundation slab at abutment face= 1.200 m
Thickness of foundation slab at edge= 0.600 m
Length of foundation slab = 16.1 m
Width of foundation slab = 7.1 m
Bottom of foundation slab = 340.939 m
Top of foundation slab = 342.139 m

Approach Slab :
Length of approach slab = 3.500 m
Thickness of approach slab = 0.438 m (At mid-section)
Thickness of approach slab = 0.300 m (At edge)
d) Material Properties :
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Grade of Concrete = M 30
Unit Weight of concrete = 25 KN/m3
Unit Weight of Cement concrete Wearing Coat = 25 KN/m3
Unit Weight of Bituminus concrete Wearing Coat = 22 KN/m3
e) Soil property:-
Density of soil = 20.00 KN/m3
Angle of Shearing resistance of backfill soil = 30o
Property of Backfill material behind Abutment and Return wall
f= 30.00 o
d= 20.00 o

a= 0.00 o

i= 0.00 o

g= 20.00 KN/m3

FRL = 350.288 m

2.680 0.5

1
1.25

4.400
CL of bearing

3.70 2.2 Top of foundation =342.139 m

1.2
1.2
0.6
Bottom of foundation =340.939 m

7.10

Details of abutment
LOAD CALCULATIONS

Permanent Load :
Self Weight/Dead Load

Dead Load from super-structure = 6100 KN


So, dead load in one abutment = 3050 KN
Line of action of load from center of abutment = -0.1 m
Self weight of dirt wall = (16 m x 2.68 m x 0.4 m x 25)= 428.8 KN
Line of action of load from center of bearing = -0.45 m
Self weight of Abutment Cap = (16 m x 1.25 m x 1 m x 25)= 500.000 KN
Line of action of load from center of bearing = -0.025 m
Self weight of abutment shaft = (16 m x 4.4 m x 1.2 m x 25)= 2112.000 KN
Self weight of foundation slab = 16.1 m x [ { 0.5 x ( 7.1 + 1.2 ) m x ( 1.2 - 0.6 ) m } + ( 7.1 m x 0.6 m ) ] x 25
= 2716.875 KN
Backfill Weight

Weight of backfill above the hill side of the abutment foundation slab=
( 15.1 m x 3.7 m x 7.6335 m x 20)-(0.05 m x 3.68 m x 15.1 m x 20)= 9465.797 KN
Distance of center of load from abutment center = 2.35 m

Earth Pressure
Calculation of Active Earth Pressure Coefficient (Static)
cos2(8-8) = 0.75
cos28 = 1.00
cos(8+8) = 0.94
cos(8-8) =1.00
sin(8+8) = 0.77
sin(8-8) =0.50
Ka = 0.279
Considering dirt wall
Height of Dirt wall = H = 2.680 m
Length of dirt wall = 16.000 m

2.680

1.126

14.95 KN/m2
Earth pressure at base due to backfill soil =0.279x20x2.68 = 14.95 KN/m2
Total load on dirt wall = 320.53 KN
This load is located 0.42 of the height of wall above base,
Lever arm = 1.126 m…..(Clause 214.1,IRC:6-2014,page-41)
Moment at dirt wall base = 360.786 KN-m

Considering abutment wall :


Height of the abutment=Height of abutment wall+Dirt wall= 8.080 m
Length of abutment wall = 16.00 m
Height from foundation slab bottom to deck level = 9.280 m

8.08

3.394

45.086 KN/m2

Calculation of moment due to earth pressure :-


Earth pressure at base due to backfill soil =0.279x20x8.08 = 45.086 KN/m2
Horizontal force due to backfill earth = 2914.38 KN (Considering abutment bottom)
This load is located 0.42 of the height of wall above base,
Lever arm = 3.394 m…..(Clause 214.1,IRC:6-2014,page-41)
Acting at a ht of = 3.394 m ( from base of abutment )
Earth pressure at base due to backfill soil =0.279x20x9.28 = 51.782 KN/m2
Horizontal force due to backfill earth = 3844.33 KN (Considering foundation slab bottom)
Acting at a ht of = 0.42 m of total height = 3.90 m ( from bottom of foundation slab level )
Total moment at the base of abutment due to earth pressure = 9890.26 KN-m
Total moment at the base of foundation slab due to earth pressure = 14983.643 KN-m
Variable gravity loads treated as permanent loads

Super Imposed Dead Load (SIDL) (except surfacing)


Super Imposed Dead Load acting on abutment = 423 KN

Surfacing and Wearing Coat


Surfacing or loading on abutment due to cement concrete wearing coat = ( 2 x 24.66m x 1.5m x 0.075m x 25KN/cum)KN /2
(For footpath) = 69.36 KN
Surfacing or loading on abutment due to cement concrete wearing coat = (24.66m x 11m x 0.065m x 22KN/cum)KN /2
(For carriageway) = 193.95 KN

So,on one abutment total surfacing load or load due to wearing coat = 263.31 KN
Vehicular Live Load

Carriageway Live load


(I) 3 lanes of Class-A
(II) 1 lane of 70R + 1 lane of Class A
(III) 1 lane of 70R Wheele + 1 lane of Class A
(IV) 1 lane of Special Vehicle( 385 T)
1 Type of Loading = Class A train of vehicle.
A) One Span Loaded
Span, Le = 24.00 m Case - 1: One Lane / one span loaded.
Lc = 0.33 m Minimum Clearence = 150 mm
Expansion gap = 0.04 m Width of ground contact (In transverse direction) = 500 mm
Impact Factor = 1.15 Width of Footpath with crush barrier & kerb = 2500 mm
Width of carriageway = 11.00 m

114 114 68 68 68 68
1.2 4.3 3 3 3 9.83

0.33 24.0 0.33


Rb Ra

2.9 1.8

8m eT 8 m

Maximum Reaction = Rb = 446.0 kN


And transverse eccentricity, wrt deck, eT = 4.2 m
And longitudinal eccentricity, wrt abutment, eL = -0.1 m

Case - 2: Three Lane / One span loaded.


Minimum clearence = 1200 mm between two outer edges of vehicle.
CG of Load
0.70
2.5 0.4 1.7 1.6 1.7
1.8 0.2 1.8

8 8
684
Maximum Reaction = 1338.1 kN
And transverse eccentricity, wrt deck, eT = 0.70 m
And longitudinal eccentricity, wrt abutment, eL = -0.1 m

2 Type of Loading = IRC class 70R Tracked + Single lane Class A


A) One Span Loaded
Case - 1: 70R Tracked + Class A
Span, Le = 24 m Minimum Clearence = 1200 mm
Lc = 0.33 m Width of ground contact = 840 mm
Expansion gap = 0.04 m Width of footpath with kerb & crash barrier = 2500 mm
Impact factor = 1.100 Width of carriageway = 11.00 m

700/4.57 = 153.17 kN/m


4.57

0.33 24.0 0.33


Rb Ra
70R Tracked Loading 1.92 Class A Loading
350 350 114 114

2.5 1.2 1.22 1.2 1.3 3.4 2.5


0.84 0.84 0.5 0.5

8 8
928
Maximum Reaction for 70R Tracked = Rb = 698.3 kN
Maximum Reaction for single lane Class A = Rb = 446.0 kN
Hence,Total Reaction Rb = 1144.3 kN

And transverse eccentricity, wrt deck, eT = 1.92 m


And longitudinal eccentricity, wrt abutment, eL = -0.1 m

3 Type of Loading = IRC 70 R Wheel + single lane Class A


A) One Span Loaded
Case - 1: 70 R Wheel + Class A
Span, Le = 24 m Minimum Clearence = 1200 mm
Lc = 0.33 m Width of ground contact = 860 mm
Expansion gap = 0.04 m Width of footpath with kerb & crash barrier = 2500 mm
Impact factor = 1.15 Width of carriageway = 11.0 m

170 170 170 170 120 120 80


1.37 3.05 1.37 2.13 1.52 3.96 10.93

0.33 24.0 0.33


Rb Ra
Maximum reaction = Rb = 920.30 kN
Maximum reaction due to Class A = Rb = 446.02 kN
Hence,Total Reaction Rb = 1366.32 kN
max longitudinal eccentricity = eL = -0.100 m

70R Wheeled Loading Class A Loading


1.40
170 170 114 114
2.5 1.2 0.86 0.86 1.3 0.5 2.5
1.07 1.20 0.5 3.51

8 8
568
max transverse eccentricity = eT = 1.40 m
4 Type of Loading = IRC Class SV Loading : Special Multi Axel Hydraulic Trailer Vehicle
(AMENDMENT TO IRC:6-2014, AMENDMENT NO.1_CLAUSE 204.5)

A) One Span Loaded


Case - 1: IRC Class SV Loading
Span, Le = 24 m Minimum Clearence = -
Lc = 0.33 m Width of ground contact = 860 mm
Expansion gap = 0.04 m Width of crash barrier = 2500 mm
Impact factor = 1 Width of carriageway = 11.0 m

1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180 180

0.33 24 0.33
Rb Ra

Loading= 20 nos. of wheels each 180 KN @ c/c 1.5 m for 28.5 M Span.
so,(28.5/1.5+1)= 20
hence for, 24.33 m Sapn = 17
Left side of Ra 24.33 m Sapn = 17

Maximum reaction = Rb = 1563.30 kN


Hence,Total Reaction Rb = 1563.30 kN
max longitudinal eccentricity = eL = -0.100 m

0.244 0.506 0.244


8 8.00

max transverse eccentricity = eT = 0.30 m (AMENDMENT TO IRC:6-2014, AMENDMENT NO.1_CLAUSE 204.5.3)

Vehicular live load


Detail analysis of vehicular live loads are done in previous pier analysis sheets

Load cases considered for abutment are tabulated bellow :

Load due to ML MT
Load due to eL eT
CASE additional
main wheel (m) (m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
wheel
CLASS A
1500 0 1338.05 -0.100 0.700 -134 936.638
THREE LANE SINGLE SPAN

70R TRACKED ONE LANE &


CLASS A ONE LANE SINGLE 1200 0 1144.335 -0.100 1.916 -114 2192.979
SPAN
70R WHEELED ONE LANE &
CLASS A ONE LANE SINGLE 1500 0 1366.315 -0.100 1.402 -137 1915.198
SPAN
IRC CLASS SV LOADING :
SPECIAL MULTI AXEL 3060 0 1563.300 -0.100 0.300 -156 468.990
HYDRAULIC TRAILER VEHICLE
Longitudinal Forces
Calculation of Braking Forces ……. (Ref. cl. 211 of IRC 6-2014, page-37)

Case - I Case - II Case - III


Braking force line of actio
70R Wh.
70R Tr. Load +
1.2m Class A - +Class-A - Class-A -
Three lane / Three Lane , Three
one span one span Lane , one
loaded loaded span loaded
a Total Load kN = 1500 1200 1500
b Braking force Fh kN = 125.00 215 225
c Braking force at Abutment side Fh/2 kN = 62.50 107.5 112.5
d Breaking forces at bearing level Fh/2 + Vr.Itc kN = 197.27 242.27 247.27
e ThickNess of wearing coat m = 0.065 0.065 0.065
f Ht. of Braking force act above bearing m = 3.713 3.713 3.713
g Moment at bearing level kN-m = 232.06 399.15 417.71
h Reaction as push/pull (+/-) kN = 9.67 16.63 17.40
i For moment at Abt. base, lever arm m = 5.646 5.646 5.646
j Longitudinal moment at Abt. base due to bearing force kN-m = 1113.81 1367.88 1396.11

Calculation of shear rating of support


Type of bearing at support = Elastomeric
For a simply supported span sitting on identical elastomeric bearing at each end resting on unyielding supports,
Force at each end = Fh/2 + (Vr x Itc) ( Ref:IRC:6-2000,clause214.5.1.4,where, Vr = shear rating ,Itc = movement
of deck above bearing other than that due to applied load )
Size Elastomeric Bearing (in cm)= = 56 x 38 x 9.6
No of girder = 5
No of bearing pad taking load = 5
ThickNess of neoprene that taking shear = 4.80 cm
Shear Modulus = 10 Kg/cm2
Shear Rating (Vr) = 22166.667 Kg/cm
Movement of deck (Itc) = = 0.608 cm ( Due to temperature and shrinkage )
56

9.6 0.6
56 9.6
38
0.6

Force on Abutment in Non-Seismic case = (F h/2 + Vr.Itc) Where Fh = Braking Force on Pier
Hence Force on Abutment cap in Non-Seismic Condition
( Case I ) = 125/ 2 + (22166.667 x 0.608/100) = 197.273 KN
( Case III ) = 215 / 2 + (22166.667 x 0.608/100) = 242.273 KN
( Case V ) = 225 / 2 x (22166.667 + 0.608/100) = 247.273 KN

Live load surcharge pressure is to be considered


Equivalent to 1.2 m height of soil = 6.70 KN/m2 …..(Clause 214.1,IRC:6-2010,page-37)
Considering dirt wall :
Height of Dirt wall = H = 2.680 m
Length of dirt wall = 16.000 m
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 287.124 KN

Moment at base of dirt wall due to live


load surcharge = 384.747 KN-m

2.680
1.340

6.70 KN/m2

Considering Abutment Shaft


Height of the abutment=Height of abutment wall+Dirt wall= 8.084 m
Length of abutment wall = 16.00 m
Height from foundation slab bottom to deck level = 8.687 m
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 866.087 KN (For abutment)
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 930.637 KN (For foundation slab base)

Moment at base of abutment wall due to live


load surcharge = 3500.73 KN-m
Moment at base of foundation slab due to live
8.084 load surcharge = 4041.989 KN-m

4.042

6.70 KN/m2

Wind load calculation:


(As per IRC:6-2014, clause 209, page-27)
pz = 463.7 N/m2 (From IRC:6-2014, table 5, for 33m/s basic wind speed)
Basic wind speed at bridge location = 39 m/s
Actual hourly mean wind pressure = 0.65 KN/m2
Wind force = Area x pz x G x ( CD or CL )
= Area x pz'
= Area x 2.526 KN/m2 for super-structure
Where G = 2.00
CD = 1.95 for super-structure (from table 5, IRC:6-2014, page-33)
1.3 for abutment shaft
CL = 0.75 (Lift co-efficient)
Wind load as per clause 209, IRC:6-2014
a Wind Force on superstructure:
i. Transverse wind force (FT) :
Solid area (A1) = Exposed area in Transverse direction = 82.449 m2
FT for abutment = 104 kN
ii. Longitudinal wind force (FL) :
FL = 25% of transverse wind force = 26.03 kN
iii. Vertical wind load (FV) :
Plan area (A3) for abutment = 197.6 m2
Lift Coefficient (CL) = 0.75
FV = 192 kN
b Wind force on live load:
as per clause 209.3.7 of IRC: 6, 2014, bridge shall not be
considered to carry any live load if the basic wind velocity exceeds 36m/sec.
c Wind force on Substructure:
Pier Cap Velocity Of Wind
i. Transverse wind force: Position Direction vert. comp. Hortz. Comp.
Exposed area = 1.25 m2 kN kN
Super
Transverse wind force = 2.1 kN structure Transverse 191.96 104.13
ii. Longitudinal Wind Force: Longitudinal 26.03
Exposed area = 16.0 m2

ACCIDENTAL ACTIONS

Seismic Hazards

Seismic Zone of bridge location = III


Zone factor, Z = 0.16 (Table 7, IRC:6-2014, page-51)
Seismic importance factor of the structure( I )= 1.2 (Table 8, IRC:6-2014, page-55)
Average response acceleration co-efficient (S a/g) 2.5 (Clause 219.5.1, IRC:6-2014, page-54)
Horizontal seismic co-efficient Ah
= (Z/2)X (I)X(Sa/g)/R = 0.240 /R
Where R is response reduction factor to be considered
Is ductile detailing to be done ? No
Value of R for sub-structure = 2.5
Hence horizontal seismic co-efficient (A h) for sub-structure = 0.096
Horizontal seismic force, Feq = Ah.(Dead Load+Appropriate Live Load)

Seismic force due to dead load


(Inertia loads due to self-mass generated in bridge structure by ground acceleration)
A. Seismic on Superstructure:
Seismic forces in super-structure and SIDL without surfacing is done in previous pier calculation sheets
Dead Load from super-structure and SIDL without surfacing = = 3473 KN
C.G. of Deck from girder bottom = 1.642 m
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient Ah = 0.096
Seismic force in longitudinal direction Fh Ah x (Total Dead Load)= 333.42 KN
Seismic force in longitudinal direction taken by one support Fh = 333.42 KN ………r1
Acting at RL = 349.279 m
Lever arm for moment at bearing level = 1.642 m
Longitudinal moment at bearing level = 547.47 KN-m
Vertical pull-push effect due to Horizontal seismic force = 22.811 KN
Lever arm for moment at abutment base = 5.646 m
Longitudinal moment at abutment base = 1882.461 KN-m ……..Mz
Horizontal seismic force in transeverse direction = Fh = 333.42 KN ………..r2
Acting at RL = 349.279 m
Lever arm for moment at abutment base = 5.646 m
Transeverse moment at abutment base = 1882.46 KN-m ……Mx
Vertical component of seismic force = 222.277 KN …r3 (Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-51)

Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2014, page-51)


Design force in longitudinal direction = ±r1±0.3r2±0.3r3 = 500.123 KN
Design force in transeverse direction = ±0.3r1±r2±0.3r3 = 500.123 KN
Design force in vertical direction = ±0.3r1±0.3r2±r3 = 422.326 KN
Design longitudinal moment at Abutment base= Mz + 0.3Mx = 2447.199 KN-m
Design transeverse moment at Abutment base = 0.3M z+ Mx = 2447.20 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 2967.33 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab=0.3 Mz + Mx = 2967.33 KN-m
B. Seismic on Sufacing:
Surfacing or load due to wearing coat taken by one abutment = 263.307 KN
C.G. of wearing coat from girder bottom = 2.476 m
Design Horizontal Seismic coefficient Ah = 0.096 kN
Seismic force in longitudinal direction Fh Ah x (Total Dead Load) = 25.277 KN
Seismic force in longitudinal direction taken by one support Fh = 25.277 KN ………r1
Acting at RL = 350.25 m
Lever arm for moment at bearing level = 2.476 m
Longitudinal moment at bearing level = 62.57 KN-m
Vertical pull-push effect due to Horizontal seismic force = 2.61 KN
Lever arm for moment at abutment base = 5.646 m
Longitudinal moment at abutment base = 142.72 KN-m ……..Mz
Horizontal seismic force in transeverse direction = Fh = 25.277 KN ………..r2
Acting at RL = 350.25 m
Lever arm for moment at abutment base = 5.646 m
Transeverse moment at abutment base = 142.72 KN-m ……Mx
Vertical component of seismic force = 16.852 KN ……r3 (Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-47)

Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2010, page-47)


Design force in longitudinal direction = ±r1±0.3r2±0.3r3 = 37.92 KN
Design force in transeverse direction = ±0.3r1±r2±0.3r3 = 37.92 KN
Design force in vertical direction = ±0.3r1±0.3r2±r3 = 32.02 KN
Design longitudinal moment = Mz+ 0.3Mx = 185.53 KN-m
Design transeverse moment = 0.3Mz+ Mx = 185.53 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 224.96 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab= 0.3Mz + Mx = 224.96 KN-m

C. Seismic on Dirt wall :


CG of the dirt wall from top of foundation slab = 5.740 m
Longitudinal seismic force = A_h x W_dirt wall = 41.16 KN ……….r1
Acting at RL = 347.879 m RL
Longitudinal moment at Abutment base = 236.258 KN-m ……..Mz
Transverse seismic = A_h x W_dirt wall = 41.16 KN ……….r2
Acting at RL = 347.879 m RL
Transeverse moment at Abutment base = 236.258 KN-m ……..Mx
Vertical component of seismic force =(2/3)x Horizontal Force Component (Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-51)
= 27.440 KN ………r3

Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2014, page-52)


Design force in longitudinal direction = ±r1±0.3r2±0.3r3 = 61.74 KN
Design force in transeverse direction =±0.3r1±r2±0.3r3 = 61.74 KN
Design force in vertical direction =±0.3r1 ± 0.3r2 ± r3 = 52.136 KN
Design longitudinal moment = Mz + 0.3Mx = 307.136 KN-m
Design transeverse moment = 0.3Mz + Mx = 307.136 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 371.346 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab= 0.3Mz + Mx = 371.346 KN-m

D. Seismic on Abutment Cap:


CG of the abutment cap from top of foundation slab = 4.900 m
Longitudinal seismic force = A_h x W_cap = 48.00 KN ……….r1
Acting at RL = 347.039 m RL
Longitudinal moment = = 235.200 KN-m ……..Mz
Transverse seismic = A_h x A_cap = 48.00 KN ……….r2
Acting at RL = 347.039 m RL
Transeverse moment = 235.200 KN-m ……..Mx
Vertical component of seismic force =(2/3)x Horizontal Force Component
(Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-51)
= 32.000 KN ………r3
Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2014, page-52)
Design force in longitudinal direction = ± r1 ± 0.3r2 ± 0.3r3 = 72 KN
Design force in transeverse direction = ± 0.3r1 ± r2 ± 0.3r3 = 72 KN
Design force in vertical direction = ± 0.3r1 ± 0.3r2 ± r3 = 60.800 KN
Design longitudinal moment = Mz + 0.3Mx = 305.760 KN-m
Design transeverse moment = 0.3Mz + Mx = 305.760 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 380.640 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab= 0.3Mz + Mx = 380.640 KN-m

E. Seismic on Abutment Shaft:


CG of the abutment shaft from top of foundation slab = 2.200 m
Longitudinal seismic force = A_h x A_shaft = 202.75 KN ……….r1
Acting at RL = 344.339 m RL
Longitudinal moment at Abutment base = 446.05 KN-m ……..Mz
Transverse seismic = A_h x A_cap = 202.75 KN ……….r2
Acting at RL = 344.339 m RL
Transeverse moment at Abutment base = 446.05 KN-m ……..Mx
Vertical component of seismic force =(2/3)x Horizontal Force Component (Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-51)
= 135.168 KN ………r3

Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2014, page-52)


Design force in longitudinal direction =±r1±0.3r2±0.3r3 = = 304.128 KN
Design force in transeverse direction = ±0.3r1±r2±0.3r3 = 304.128 KN
Design force in vertical direction =±0.3r1±0.3r2±r3 = 256.819 KN
Design longitudinal moment = Mz + 0.3Mx = 579.871 KN-m
Design transeverse moment = 0.3Mz + Mx = 579.871 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 896.164 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab= 0.3Mz + Mx = 896.164 KN-m

F. Seismic on Return Walls:


CG of the return walls from top of foundation slab 4.111 m
Longitudinal seismic force = A_h x R_walls 78.92 KN ……….r1
Acting at RL 346.275 m RL
Longitudinal moment at Abutment base 326.380 KN-m ……..Mz
Transverse seismic = A_h x R_walls 78.92 KN ……….r2
Acting at RL 346.275 m RL
Transeverse moment at Abutment base 326.380 KN-m ……..Mx
Vertical component of seismic force =(2/3)x Horizontal Force Component (Clause 219.3, IRC:6-2014, page-51)
= 52.614 KN ………r3

Combination of force components …….(Clause 219.4, IRC:6-2014, page-52)


Design force in longitudinal direction = ± r1 ± 0.3r2 ± 0.3r3 = 118.382 KN
Design force in transeverse direction = ± 0.3r1± r2± 0.3r3 = 118.382 KN
Design force in vertical direction = ± 0.3r1 ± 0.3r2 ± r3 = 99.967 KN
Design longitudinal moment = Mz + 0.3Mx = 424.294 KN-m
Design transeverse moment = 0.3Mz + Mx = 424.294 KN-m
Design longitudinal moment at bottom of foundation slab= Mz + 0.3M = 547.41 KN-m
Design transverse moment at bottom of foundation slab= 0.3Mz + Mx = 547.41 KN-m
G. Seismic on carriageway live load …….(Clause 219.5.2, IRC:6-2014, page-55)
(Inertia loads due to mass of vehicular live load)

20% Reaction Ah Transverse Acting RL at Lever arm Transverse

component
vertical force
sl. No.

moment at
(KN) seismic (+1.20) at Abutment Abutment
Live Load Case force base base

For Class-A Class A 70R


2 Three lane class A/ one span loaded 232.71 0.096 22.34 351.49 9.35 208.85 14.89
For IRC class 70R Tracked
5 One lane 70R TR & one lane class A / one span loaded 204.54 0.096 19.64 351.49 9.35 183.57 13.09
For IRC class 70R Wheeled
7 One lane 70R Wh. & one lane class A/ one span loaded 237.62 0.096 22.81 351.49 9.35 213.26 15.21

I. Increased Earth Pressure due to Seismic

Calculation of Dynamic Earth Pressure Coefficient …..(Clause 8, IS:1893-1984, page-46)


Horizontal seismic force co-efficient = Ah = 0.096
Horizontal seismic force co-efficient = Av = 0.06
Calculation of Active Earth Pressure Coefficient (Dynamic)

For +Av : For -Av :


1+Av = 1.064 1-Av = 0.936

l= tan-1{Ah/(1+Av)}= 5.1556 o 8 = tan-1{Ah/(1-Av)} = 5.8560 o

cos2(8-8-8) = 0.8235 cos2(8-8-8) = 0.8327


cos(8+8+8) = 0.9052 cos(8+8+8) = 0.8999
cos(8-8) = 1.0000 cos(8-8) = 1.0000
cos8 = 0.9960 cos8 = 0.9948
cos28 = 1.0000 cos28 = 1.0000
sin(8+8) = 0.7660 sin(8+8) = 0.7660
sin(8-8-8) = 0.4202 sin(8-8-8) = 0.4090
Ca = 0.381 Ca = 0.344
Maximum of these two = 0.381 to be considered

Considering dirt wall portion


Height of Dirt wall = H = 2.680 m
Length of dirt wall = 16.000 m

2.680

1.126

5.49 KN/m2
Dynamic increment :
Earth pressure at base due to backfill = 5.49 KN/m2
Horizontal force due to backfill soil = 117.71 KN
Acting at =2.68 x 0.42= 1.126 m
(Clause-8.1.1.2,IS:1893-1984,Page-47)
Bending moment increment for dynamic condition= 132.49 KNm
Considering Abutment Shaft
Height of the abutment=Height of abutment wall+Dirt wall= 8.074 m
Length of abutment wall = 16.00 m
Height from foundation slab bottom to deck level = 9.274 m

8.074

3.39

16.540 KN/m2
Dynamic increment
Earth pressure at abutment base due to backfill = 16.540 KN/m2
Horizontal force increment due to backfill soil = 1068.35 KN (For abutment shaft)
Acting at a ht. of = 3.39 m ( from base of abutment )
Horizontal force increment due to backfill soil = 1268.36 KN (from bottom of foundation slab)
Acting at a ht. of = 3.90 m ( from bottom of foundation slab level )
Total moment increment at the base of abutment due to Earth pressure = 3622.87 KN-m
Total moment increment at the base of foundation slab due to Earth pressure = 4940.35 KN-m

Earthpressure surcharge effect due to live load :

Live load surcharge pressure is to be considered


Equivalent to 1.2 m height of soil = 2.46 KN/m2 …..(Clause 214.1,IRC:6-2014,page-41)

Considering dirt wall :


Height of Dirt wall = H = 2.680 m
Length of dirt wall = 16.000 m
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 105.485 KN

Moment at base of dirt wall due to live


load surcharge = 141.350 KN-m

2.680

1.340

2.46 KN/m2
Considering Abutment Shaft
Height of the abutment=Height of abutment wall+Dirt wall= 8.074 m
Length of abutment wall = 16.00 m
Height from foundation slab bottom to deck level = 9.274 m
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 317.793 KN (For abutment)
Total horizontal force in longitudinal direction = 365.025 KN (For foundation slab bnase)

Moment at base of abutment wall due to live


load surcharge = 1282.929 KN-m
Moment at base of foundation slab due to live
load surcharge = 1692.619 KN-m

8.074

4.037
2.46 KN/m2
Load combination at abutment base:-

SL
LOAD DESCRIPTION V HL HT LA ML MT
NO
A Permanent Action
i Dead load from super-structure 3050 -305.00
ii Self weight of dirt wall 428.80 -192.960
iii Self weight of abutment cap 500.00 -12.50
iv Self weight of abutment wall 2112.00
v Self weight of return wall 822.1 -2137.46
vi Earth Pressure due to back-Fill 2914.38 3.39 9890.26
B Variable gravity treated as Permanent
i Super Imposed Dead Load 423 -42.31
ii Surfacing 263.307 -26.33
D Variable Actions
Vehicular Live Load
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 1338.1 -133.81 936.64
ii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 1144.3 -114.43 2192.98
iii 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 1366.3 -136.63 1915.20
IRC Class SV Loading : Special Multi Axel Hydraulic
iv Trailer Vehicle-1 LANE 1 SPAN 1563.3 -156.33 468.99
i Longitudinal Forces (Braking)
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 9.7 197.27 5.646 1113.81
iii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 16.6 242.27 5.646 1367.88
v 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 17.4 247.27 5.646 1396.11
Earth Surcharge due to Live Load 866.09 4.04 3500.73
E Seismic Forces
Seismic forces for dead load
a) on superstructure 422.33 500.12 500.12 2447.20 2447.20
b) Surfacing 32.02 37.92 37.92 185.53 185.53
c) on dirt wall 52.14 61.74 61.74 307.14 307.14
d) on abutment cap 60.80 72.00 72.00 305.76 305.76
e) on abutment wall 256.82 304.13 304.13 579.87 579.87
f) on return wall 99.97 118.38 118.38 424.29 424.29
vertical push-pull due to seismic at sup. 25.42
Seismic forces for Live Load
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 14.9 22.34 9.35 208.85
iii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 13.1 19.64 9.35 183.57
v 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 15.2 22.81 9.35 213.26
Wind Load
Wind Load on super-structure 191.96 26.03 104.13 4.07 106.06 424.259
Increased Earth Pressure due to seismic 1068.35 3.39 3622.87
Increased surcharge earth pressure due to
seismic 317.793 4.037 1282.93
Load combination at Bottom of foundation level (For open foundation) :-

SL
LOAD DESCRIPTION V HL HT LA ML MT
NO
A Permanent Action
i Dead load from super-structure 3050.00 -305.000
ii Self weight of dirt wall 428.80 -192.960
iii Self weight of abutment cap 500.00 -12.50
iv Self weight of abutment wall 2112.00
v Self weight of return wall 822.1 -2137.46
vi Self weight of foundation slab 2716.9
vii Back Fill weight on foundation slab 9465.8
viii Earth Pressure due to back-Fill 3844.33 3.90 14983.64
B Variable gravity treated as Permanent
i Super Imposed Dead Load 423.073 -42.31
ii Surfacing 263.307 -26.33
D Variable Actions
Vehicular Live Load
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 1163.53 -116.35 814.47
ii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 634.83 -63.48 1216.58
iii 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 800.26 -80.03 1121.74
IRC Class SV Loading : Special Multi Axel Hydraulic
iv Trailer Vehicle-1 LANE 1 SPAN 1563.30 -156.33 468.99
Longitudinal Forces (Braking)
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 9.67 197.27 6.85 1350.53
ii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 16.63 242.27 6.85 1658.60
iii 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 17.40 247.27 6.85 1692.83
Earth Surcharge due to Live Load 930.64 4.34 4041.99
E Seismic Forces
Seismic forces for dead load
a) on superstructure 527.91 625.15 625.15 1.20 3709.16 3709.16
b) Surfacing 40.02 47.40 47.40 1.20 281.21 281.21
c) on dirt wall 65.17 77.18 77.18 1.20 464.18 464.18
d) on abutment cap 76.00 90.00 90.00 1.20 475.80 475.80
e) on abutment wall 321.02 380.16 380.16 1.20 1120.20 1120.20
f) on return wall 124.96 147.98 147.98 1.20 684.27 684.27
vertical push-pull due to seismic at sup. 31.77
Seismic forces for Live Load
i CLASS A-3 LANE 1SPAN 18.62 27.92 10.55 294.58
iii 70R TRACKED -1LANE+ CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 16.36 24.54 10.55 258.92
v 70R WHEELED-1 LANE + CL-A 1L 1 SPAN 19.01 28.51 10.55 300.80
Wind Load
Wind Load on super-structure 191.96 26.03 104.13 5.27 137.30 549.21
Increased Earth Pressure due to seismic 1585.446 3.90 6175.44
Increased surcharge earth pressure seismic 456.281 4.64 2115.77
LOAD COMBINATION FOR PIER SHAFT BASE (For Ultimate Limit State)

Loads V ML MT HL HT
Dead Load 6912.90 -2647.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL 423.07 -42.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Surfacing 263.31 -26.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Class A(3L/1S) LL1 1338.05 -133.81 936.64 0.00 0.00
70R Tr.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL2 1144.33 -114.43 2192.98 0.00 0.00
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 1366.32 -136.63 1915.20 0.00 0.00
Class SV LL4 1563.30 -156.33 468.99 0.00 0.00
BrakingClass A(3L/1S) LL1 9.67 1113.81 0.00 197.27 0.00
Braking70R Tr.1L+CL-A
0.00 0.00
1L(1S) LL2 16.63 1367.88 242.27
Braking70R Wh.1L+CL-A
0.00 0.00
1L(1S) LL3 17.40 1396.11 247.27
Earth Pressure 0.00 9890.26 0.00 2914.38 0.00
LL surcharge on Earth Pr. 0.00 3500.73 0.00 866.09 0.00
Dead Load Seismic 949.48 4249.79 4249.79 1094.29 1094.29
Seismic Class A(3L/1S) LL1 14.89 0.00 208.85 0.00 22.34
Seismic 70R Tr.1L+CL-A 13.09 0.00 183.57 0.00 19.64
1L(1S) LL2
Seismic 70R Wh.1L+CL-A 15.21 0.00 213.26 0.00 22.81
1L(1S) LL3
Wind load 191.96 106.06 424.26 26.03 104.13
Increased Earth Pr. due to Sis. 0.00 3622.87 0.00 1068.35 0.00
Increased EP surch. due to Sis. 0.00 1282.93 0.00 317.79 0.00

NON-SEISMIC CASE

B WIND
A DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP DL+/-WL
Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1.00 Dead Load 1.00
SIDL 1.00 SIDL 1.00
Surfacing 1.00 Surfacing 1.00
LL 1.50 LL 1.50
Braking LL 1.15 Braking LL 1.15
EP 1.50 EP 1.50
EP LL surcharge 1.20 EP LL surcharge 1.20
WL 1.50

SEISMIC CASE
A C
DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL+DL S+LL S+EP S+EP LL S DL+SIDL+Surfacing+EP+DL seis+EP seis
Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1 Dead Load 1.00
SIDL 1 SIDL 1.00
Surfacing 1 Surfacing 1.00
LL 0.2 EP 1.00
Braking LL 0.2 DL sis 1.50
EP 1 EP seis 1.50
EP LL surcharge 0.2
DL sis 1.5
LL sis 1.5
EP LL sis 1.5
EP sis 1.5
Vu MLu MTu HLu Htu
1 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge 9617.48 17399.87 1404.96 5637.75 0.00
2 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge 9334.91 17721.10 3289.47 5689.50 0.00
3 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge 9668.77 17720.27 2872.80 5695.25 0.00
NON SEISMIC

4 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL4+EP+EP LL Surcharge 9944.23 16085.20 703.49 5410.88 0.00


5 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 9905.42 17558.96 2041.34 5676.79 156.19
6 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 9622.85 17880.20 3925.86 5728.54 156.19
7 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 9956.71 17879.37 3509.19 5734.29 156.19
8 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 9329.54 17240.77 768.57 5598.70 -156.19
9 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 9046.96 17562.01 2653.08 5650.45 -156.19
10 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 9380.82 17561.17 2236.41 5656.20 -156.19
DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL1 S+EP
11 S+EP LL Surcharge 9293.05 21803.22 187.33 6847.71 0.00
SEISMIC

DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL2 S+EP


12 S+EP LL Surcharge 9255.70 21857.91 438.60 6856.71 0.00
DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL3 S+EP
13 S+EP LL Surcharge 9300.25 21859.12 383.04 6857.71 0.00
14 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+EP+DL seis+EP seis 9023.51 18982.69 0.00 6158.35 0.00
LOAD COMBINATION FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT BASE (For Servicibility Limit State)

Loads V ML MT HL HT
Dead Load 6912.90 -2647.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL 423.07 -42.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Surfacing 263.31 -26.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Class A(3L/1S) LL1 1338.05 -133.81 936.64 0.00 0.00
1144.33 -114.43 2192.98 0.00 0.00
70R Tr.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL2
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) 1366.32 -136.63 1915.20 0.00 0.00
LL3
Class SV LL4 1563.30 -156.33 468.99 0.00 0.00
BrakingClass A(3L/1S) LL1 9.67 1113.81 0.00 197.27 0.00
Braking70R Tr.1L+CL-A 16.63 1367.88 0.00 242.27 0.00
1L(1S) LL2
Braking70R Wh.1L+CL-A 17.40 1396.11 0.00 247.27 0.00
1L(1S) LL3
Earth Pressure 0.00 9890.26 0.00 2914.38 0.00
LL surcharge on Earth Pr. 0.00 3500.73 0.00 866.09 0.00
Dead Load Seismic 949.48 4249.79 4249.79 1094.29 1094.29
Seismic Class A(3L/1S) LL1 14.89 0.00 208.85 0.00 22.34

Seismic 70R Tr.1L+CL-A 13.09 0.00 183.57 0.00 19.64


1L(1S) LL2
Seismic 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL3 15.21 0.00 213.26 0.00 22.81
Wind load 191.96 106.06 424.26 26.03 104.13
Increased Earth Pr. due to Sis. 0.00 3622.87 0.00 1068.35 0.00
Increased EP surch. due to Sis. 0.00 1282.93 0.00 317.79 0.00

NON-SEISMIC CASE

B WIND
A DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP DL+/-WL
Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1.00 Dead Load 1.00
SIDL 1.00 SIDL 1.00
Surfacing 1.00 Surfacing 1.00
LL 1.00 LL 1.00
Braking LL 1.00 Braking LL 1.00
EP 1.00 EP 1.00
EP LL surcharge 0.80 EP LL surcharge 0.80
WL 1.00

Vu MLu MTu HLu Htu


1 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL 8947.00 10954.28 936.64 3804.53 0.00
2 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL 8760.25 11227.72 2192.98 3849.53 0.00
3 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL 8983.00 11233.75 1915.20 3854.53 0.00
NON SEISMIC

4 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL4+EP+EP LL 9162.58 9817.95 468.99 3607.25 0.00


5 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL+WL 9138.97 11060.34 1360.90 3830.56 104.13
6 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL+WL 8952.21 11333.79 2617.24 3875.56 104.13
7 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL+WL 9174.96 11339.82 2339.46 3880.56 104.13
8 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL-WL 8755.04 10848.21 512.38 3778.50 -104.13
NON SEIS
9 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL-WL 8568.28 11121.66 1768.72 3823.50 -104.13
10 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL-WL 8791.04 11127.69 1490.94 3828.50 -104.13
ABUTMENT SHAFT DESIGN

Total Ultimate Loads (Loads in KN, moments in KN-m)


Load Case Vu MLu MTu
13 Maximum longitudinal Moment case 9300.25 21859.1 383.04
7 Maximum vertical load case 9956.71 17879.4 3509.19
9 Minimum vertical load case 9046.96 17562.0 2653.08
14 Unloaded case 9023.51 18982.7 0.00
Section is checked at abutment base

Length of abutment = 16.00 m


Abutment stem thickness at bottom = 1.2 m
Area of section = 19.20 m2

Grade of concrete : M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Ecm of concrete = 31000 N/mm2 (From table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page no. 38)
Es of steel = 200000 N/mm 2
(From clause6.3.5, IRC:112-2011, page no. 32)

Design compressive strength of concrete = sc = fcd = afck/gm = 13.400 N/mm2


(From clause6.3.5, IRC:112-2011, page no. 49)
Design peak strength of steel = fy/gs = 434.783 N/mm2

Checking as wall:
Ref. Cl-7.6.4.1, IRC-112:2011
0.1.fcd.Ac= 25728 kN
Maximum Design verical Load= 9956.71 kN
The section is to be designed for pure bending element also.
Checking for pure Bending:
Design moment = 21859.12 KN-m
Width of section = 16.00 m
Depth of section = 1.2 m
Concrete failure strain = εcu1 = 0.0035 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Concrete limiting strain = εc2 = 0.002 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.00218
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87fy/Es+0.002) = 0.00418

Total reinforcement provided = 62800 mm2


Clear cover = 75 mm
Effective depth "d" = 1112.5 mm
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb )= 158.09 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.025 mm
Stress in steel = =0.87*fy= 434.783 Mpa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 507.3 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok, proceed
CG of compressive force = 65.766 mm from most compressed surface
Moment of resistance, Mu =0.87*fy*Ast*(d-0.416*xu) =
28580.40 kN-m OK
Slenderness criteria check:
Clear height of Abutment shaft = 4.400 m (upto abutment cap top)
Effective length, le = 1.3l0 = 5.72 m (Table 11.1, case-4, IRC:112-2011, page-114)

Now thickness of the wall, t = 1.2 m


Ratio of effective length to its thickness, le/t = 4.767

As the ratio does not exceed 12, it is short and no secondary effect to be considered
(clause 7.6.4, IRC:112-2011, page-57)

1 Analysis of section longitudinal direction : ( Check for load combination case 13 )


Provide 25 mm dia. Bar @ 125 mm c/c
Provide 25 mm dia. Bar 128 nos 62800 mm2
+ 25 mm dia. Bar 128 nos 62800 mm2
and 25 mm dia. Bar 7 nos 3434.375 mm2
+ 25 mm dia. Bar 7 nos 3434.375 mm2
Effective cover = 87.5 mm
The section is divided into 7 segments. Depth of each = 171 mm
Area of reinforcement in segment 1 = 63781.25 mm2
Area of steel in segment 2 to 6 981.25 mm2
Area of steel in segment 7 63781.25 mm2
total area of steel = 125600 mm2
% of steel = 0.66
P / fck = 0.022 section about longituidinal (xx) axis -
Pu / fck x b x d = 0.02 d' / D = 0.073 ~ 0.05
so, Mu / fck x b x d =
2
0.050 fy = 500
so, Mux1 = 34560 kN-m use chart no. 35

section about transverse (yy) axis -


Pu / fck x b x d = 0.02 d' / D = 0.005 ~ 0.05
so, Mu / fck x b x d =
2
0.050 fy = 500
so, Muy1 = 460800 kN-m use chart no. 35

Interaction check

(MEdx/MRdx)^a+(MEdy/MRdy)^a<= 1 (Eq. 8.3, IRC:112-2011,page-75)


7 = L/C - 12 L/C - 6 L/C - 13 L/C - 11
MEdx = Design moment in longitudinal direction = KN-m 21859.12 17879.4 18982.7 17562.0
MEdy = Design moment in transeverse direction = KN-m 383.04 3509.19 0.00 2653.08
MRdx = Resisting moment in longitudinal direction = KN-m 34560.00 34560.00 34560.00 34560.00
MRdy = Resisting moment in transeverse direction = KN-m 460800.0 460800.0 460800.0 460800.0
NEd = Design axial force = KN 9300.25 9956.71 9023.51 9046.96
NRd = Design axial resistance = KN 310205.66 310205.66 310205.66 310205.66
NEd/NRd = 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Type of cross section of abutment = Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular Rectangular
a= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
(MEdx/MRdx)^a+(MEdy/MRdy)^a = 0.63 0.52 0.55 0.51
Check = OK OK OK OK

ABUTMENT SHAFT DESIGN (SLS)

Load Case Vu MLu MTu


7 Maximum longitudinal Moment case 9174.96 11339.8 2339.46
7 Maximum vertical load case 9174.96 11339.8 2339.46
9 Minimum vertical load case 8568.28 11121.7 1768.72

Stress level check:

Grade of concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for SLS


Design moment = 708.74 KN-m (for 1m width)
Width of section = 1 m
Depth of section = 1.2 m
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
"E" value of concrete = 31000 Mpa
Modular ratio in tension = 9.3
Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48fck = 14.4 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Maximum allowable stress in steel = 0.8fyk = 400 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Total reinforcement provided = 3937 mm2
Effective depth "d" = 1112.5 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 158.59 mm
CG of compressive force = 65.970 mm from most compressed surface
Moment , Mu =σst*Ast*(d-0.416*xu) = 1792.45899 OK

So, stress in steel = 172.0 Mpa OK, within permissible limit


Total force = 677.2 KN
Stress in concrete = 8.5 Mpa OK, within permissible limit

Crack width check:

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(Ôsm-8cm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


8sm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
8cm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,
(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)
Where, ssc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 172.00 Mpa
ae = Es/Ecm = 6.4516
fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa
rr.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.ef
Where, hc.ef = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2
Where, A = level of steel centroid
x B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
81,82 = greater and lesser tensile strain
h
d

hc.eff

B
So, hc.eff = 218.75 mm
Ac.eff = 218750 mm2
Now. 88.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.01799955
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5

Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+f/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

Where, 8 = diameter of bar = 25 mm c = clear cover = 75 mm


k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
So,Sr.max = 491.117 mm
And, 8sm-8cm = 0.00047244
Minimum value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000516
So, governing value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000515997

So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8sm-8cm) = 0.253 mm


Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
crack width within permissible limit
D. LOAD COMBINATION FOR ABUTMENT FOUNDATION BASE (Ultimate Limit State)

Loads V ML MT HL HT
Dead Load 9629.77 -2647.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
Backfill weight 9465.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL 423.07313 -42.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Surfacing 263.30715 -26.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Class A(3L/1S) LL1 1163.53 -116.35 814.47 0.00 0.00

70R Tr.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL2 634.83 -63.48 1216.58 0.00 0.00

70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 800.26 -80.03 1121.74 0.00 0.00


Class SV LL4 1563.30 -156.33 468.99 0.00 0.00

BrakingClass A(3L/1S) LL1 9.67 1350.53 0.00 197.27 0.00


Braking70R Tr.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL2 16.63 1658.60 0.00 242.27 0.00
Braking70R Wh.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL3 17.40 1692.83 0.00 247.27 0.00
Earth Pressure 0.00 14983.64 0.00 3844.33 0.00
LL surcharge on Earth Pr. 0.00 4041.99 0.00 930.64 0.00
Dead Load Seismic 1186.86 6734.82 6734.82 1367.86 1367.86
Seismic Class A(3L/1S) LL1 18.62 0.00 294.58 0.00 27.92
Seismic 70R Tr.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL2 16.36 0.00 258.92 0.00 24.54
Seismic 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL3 19.01 0.00 300.80 0.00 28.51
Wind load 191.96 137.30 549.21 26.03 104.13
Increased Earth Pr. due to Sis. 0.00 6175.44 0.00 1585.45 0.00
Increased EP surch. due to Sis. 0.00 2115.77 0.00 456.28 0.00

NON-SEISMIC CASE 70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S

A DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL B DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP DL+/-WL


Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1.35 Dead Load 1.35
SIDL 1.35 SIDL 1.35
Surfacing 1.75 Surfacing 1.75
LL 1.5 LL 1.5
Braking LL 1.15 Braking LL 1.15
EP 1.5 EP 1.5
EP LL surcharge 1.2 EP LL surcharge 1.2
Thermal loads 0.90 WL 1.5
Bakfill weight 1.50
SEISMIC CASE
A C
DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL+DL S+LL S+EP S+EP LL S DL+SIDL+Surfacing+EP+DL seis+EP seis
Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1.35 Dead Load 1.35
SIDL 1.35 SIDL 1.35
Surfacing 1.75 Surfacing 1.75
LL 0.2 EP 1.00
Braking LL 0.2 DL sis 1.50
EP 1 EP seis 1.50
EP LL surcharge 0.2
DL sis 1.5
LL sis 1.5
EP LL sis 1.5
EP sis 1.5
Backfill weight 1
COMB V ML MT HL HT
N 1 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge 29987.24 25026.55 1221.70 7110.12 0.00
O 2 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge 29202.20 25460.13 1824.87 7161.87 0.00
N
3 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge 29451.23 25474.68 1682.61 7167.62 0.00
S 4 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL4+EP+EP LL Surcharge 30575.78 23413.47 703.49 6883.25 0.00
E 5 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 30275.18 25232.50 2045.51 7149.16 156.19
I 6 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 29490.15 25666.09 2648.69 7200.91 156.19
S 7 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 29739.18 25680.64 2506.43 7206.66 156.19
M
I 8 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 29699.29 24820.60 397.89 7071.07 -156.19
C 9 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 28914.26 25254.18 1001.06 7122.82 -156.19
10 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 29163.29 25268.73 858.80 7128.57 -156.19
DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL1
11 S+EP S+EP LL Surcharge 25536.91 34359.82 162.89 9105.37974 0.00
S
E DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL2
I
S 12 S+EP S+EP LL Surcharge 25426.40 34308.78 243.32 9096.38 0.00
M
I DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge+DL S+LL3
C 13 S+EP S+EP LL Surcharge 25463.30 34299 224.35 9095.38 0.00
14 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+EP+DL seis+EP seis 25278.21 30671.14 0.00 8274.29 0.00
H. LOAD COMBINATION FOR ABUTMENT FOUNDATION BASE (Servicebility Limit State)

Loads V ML MT HL HT
Dead Load 9629.77 -2647.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
Backfill weight 9465.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SIDL 423.07 -42.31 0.00 0.00 0.00
Surfacing 263.31 -26.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Class A(3L/1S) LL1 1163.53 -116.35 814.47 0.00 0.00
70R Tr.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL2 634.83 -63.48 1216.58 0.00 0.00

70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 800.26 -80.03 1121.74 0.00 0.00


Class SV LL4 1563.30 -156.33 468.99 0.00 0.00
BrakingClass A(3L/1S) LL1 9.67 1350.53 0.00 197.27 0.00
Braking70R Tr.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL2 16.63 1658.60 0.00 242.27 0.00
Braking70R Wh.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL3 17.40 1692.83 0.00 247.27 0.00
Earth Pressure 0.00 14983.64 0.00 3844.33 0.00
LL surcharge on Earth Pr. 0.00 4041.99 0.00 930.64 0.00
Dead Load Seismic 1186.86 6734.82 6734.82 1367.86 1367.86
Seismic Class A(3L/1S) LL1 18.62 0.00 294.58 0.00 27.92
Seismic 70R Tr.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL2 16.36 0.00 258.92 0.00 24.54
Seismic 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
1L(1S) LL3 19.01 0.00 300.80 0.00 28.51
Wind load 191.96 137.30 549.21 26.03 104.13
Increased Earth Pr. due to Sis. 0.00 6175.44 0.00 1585.45 0.00
Increased EP surch. due to Sis. 0.00 2115.77 0.00 456.28 0.00

NON-SEISMIC CASE

A DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP LL (II) DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL+Br. LL+EP+EP DL+/-WL


Loads FOS Loads FOS
Dead Load 1 Dead Load 1
SIDL 1 SIDL 1
Surfacing 1 Surfacing 1
LL 1 LL 1
Braking LL 0.75 Braking LL 0.75
EP 1 EP 1
EP LL surcharge 1 EP LL surcharge 1
Thermal loads 0.90 WL 1
Bakfill weight 1.00 Thermal loads 0.90

COMB V ML MT HL HT
1 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge 20952.73 17205.62 814.47 4922.92 0.00
2 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge 20429.26 17489.54 1216.58 4956.67 0.00
3 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge 20595.26 17498.67 1121.74 4960.42 0.00
NON SEISMIC

4 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL4+EP+EP LL Surcharge 21345.25 16152.74 468.99 4774.96 0.00


5 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 21144.69 17342.92 1363.68 4948.95 104.13
6 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 20621.22 17626.84 1765.79 4982.70 104.13
7 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge+WL 20787.23 17635.97 1670.95 4986.45 104.13
8 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL1+Br. LL1+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 20760.77 17068.32 265.26 4896.89 -104.13
NON SEIS 9 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL2+Br. LL2+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 20237.30 17352.24 667.37 4930.64 -104.13
10 DL+SIDL+Surfacing+LL3+Br. LL3+EP+EP LL Surcharge-WL 20403.30 17361.37 572.53 4934.39 -104.13
CHECK FOR STABILITY

1.2
0.6
A B

3.7 1.2 2.2

Distance of CL of abutment from toe = 2.8

OVERTURNING CHECK
Non-Seismic

Overturning Restoring
Loads V ML LA
moment moment
Dead Load 9629.77 -2647.92 -2647.92 2.8 26963.370
Earth weight 9465.80 0.00 0.00 5.15 48748.857
SIDL 423.07 -42.31 -42.31 2.8 1184.605
Surfacing 263.31 -26.33 -26.33 2.8 737.260
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 800.26 -80.03 -80.03 2.8 2240.723
Braking 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
17.40 1692.83 1692.83
1L(1S) LL3 2.8 48.733
Earth pressure 0.00 14983.64 14983.64 0 0.000
Earth pressure LL Surcharge 0.00 4041.99 4041.99 0 0.000
Total 17921.88 79923.548

FOS against overturning moment= 79923.548 / 17921.881 = 4.46 OK

Seismic case [Combination III , as per IRC:78-2014, Cl. 706.1]

Overturning Restoring
Loads V ML LA
moment moment
Dead Load 9629.77 -2647.92 -2647.92 2.8 26963.37
Earth weight 9465.80 0.00 0.00 5.15 48748.86
SIDL 423.07 -42.31 -42.31 2.8 1184.60
Surfacing 263.31 -26.33 -26.33 2.8 737.26
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 160.05 -80.03 -80.03 2.8 448.14
Braking 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
3.48 338.57 338.57
1L(1S) LL3 2.8 9.75
Earth Pressure 0.00 14983.64 14983.64 0 0.00
LL Surcharge earth pressure 0.00 4041.99 4041.99 0 0.00
Dead Load Seismic 1186.86 6734.82 6734.82 2.8 3323.20
Increased earth due to seismic 0.00 8291.21 8291.21 0 0.00
Total 31593.64 81415.179
FOS against overturning moment= 81415.179 / 31593.641 = 2.58 OK
SLIDING CHECK
Considering frictional co-efficient; m = 0.50
Non-Seismic

Sliding Restoring
Loads V HL
force force
Dead Load 9629.77 0.00 0.000 4814.888
Earth weight 9465.80 0.00 0.000 4732.899
SIDL 423.07 0.00 0.000 211.537
Surfacing 263.31 0.00 0.000 131.654
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 800.26 0.00 0.000 400.129
Braking 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
17.40 247.27
1L(1S) LL3 247.273 8.702
Earth pressure 0.00 3844.33 3844.325 0.000
Earth pressure LL Surcharge 0.00 930.64 930.637 0.000
Total 5022.236 10299.808

FOS against sliding= 10299.808 / 5022.236 = 2.05 OK

Seismic

Sliding Restoring
Loads V HL
force force
Dead Load 9629.77 0.00 0.00 4814.888
Earth weight 9465.80 0.00 0.00 4732.899
SIDL 423.07 0.00 0.00 211.537
Surfacing 263.31 0.00 0.00 131.654
70R Wh.1L+CL-A 1L(1S) LL3 160.05 0.00 0.00 80.026
Braking 70R Wh.1L+CL-A
3.48 49.45 49.45
1L(1S) LL3 1.740
Earth pressure 0.00 3844.33 3844.33 0.000
Earth pressure LL Surcharge 0.00 930.64 930.64 0.000
Dead Load Seismic 1186.86 1367.86 1367.86 593.428
Increased earth due to seismic 0.00 2041.73 2041.73 0.000
Total 8234.005 10566.171

FOS against sliding= 10566.171 / 8234.005 = 1.28 OK


CHECK FOR BASE PRESSURE

Length of foundation = 16.1 m


Width along heel side = 3.7 m
Width along toe side = 2.2 m
Thickness of foundation at abutment face = 1.2 m
Thickness of foundation at end = 0.6 m
Abutment shaft thickness = 1.2 m
Total width = 7.1 m
Area of foundation base = 114.31 m2
Section modulus longitudinal direction; ZL = 135.267 m3
Section modulus transverse direction; ZT = 306.732 m3
D L A

16.1 T

C 7.1 B

3.7 1.2 2.2


y1 y2

C B
b
Foundation center line from B = 3.55 m
Load center line from B = 2.8 m
Unfactored load only due to foundation wt. = 2716.88 KN

Calculation with unfactored load:


Resultant
Moment for Overturning Net reaction Eccentrici Status wrt
V, wrt point Moment ML Moment from B; x ty (e) = tension
Load V
B (MR) (MO) (MR-MO) = (MR- developme Remarks
Case b/2-x
nt
MO)/V

KN KN-m KN-m KN-m m m


MLmax 1 20791.578 83445.279 18059.18 65386.096 3.14 0.4052 e<b/6, OK
Considering Wind
Vmax 2 21537.215 85533.063 16290.05 69243.017 3.22 0.3350 e<b/6, OK
MLmax 1 22572.806 88432.717 31657.66 56775.055 2.52 1.0348 e<b/6, OK
Considering Seismic
Vmax 2 23315.197 90511.412 31581.94 58929.475 2.53 1.0225 e<b/6, OK
MLmax 3 20599.616 82907.784 17921.88 64985.903 3.15 0.3953 e<b/6, OK
Normal Case
Vmax 4 21345.253 84995.567 16152.74 68842.824 3.23 0.3248 e<b/6, OK
Unloaded Non
MLmax 5 19781.953 80618.327 -2716.558 83334.885 4.21 -0.6627 e<b/6, OK
seismic
Base pressure calculation

Base Base
V Net ML MT Base pressure pressure Base
Load
pressure (Corner (Corner pressure Remarks
Case
(Corner A) B) C) (Corner D)
KN KN-m KN-m KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2
MLmax 1 20791.58 65386.096 1670.95 249.612 238.717 114.163 125.058
Considering Wind
Vmax 2 21537.22 69243.017 1018.20 245.062 238.423 131.759 138.398
MLmax 3 20599.62 64985.903 1121.74 244.063 236.749 116.354 123.668
Normal Case
Vmax 4 21345.25 68842.824 468.99 239.513 236.455 133.949 137.007
Unloaded (Non-
MLmax 5 19781.95 83334.885 0.000 76.144 76.144 269.967 269.967
seismic)

Maximum base pressure = 269.967 KN/m2


Allowable base pressure = 350 KN/m2 OK
Minimum base pressure = 76.144 KN/m2 OK, No tension developed
G. DESIGN OF FOUNDATION BY BENDING ANALOGY (ULS)

COMB LOAD CASE Vu MLu MTu HLu HTu


11 MLmax 25536.910 34359.819 162.894 9105.380 0.000
4 Vmax 30575.779 23413.470 703.485 6883.252 0.000
14 Vmin 25278.214 30671.137 0.000 8274.286 0.000

Area of foundation base = 114.310 m2


Height of earth above heel slab = 8.626 m

ML
C D
2.20
2.588 1.113 1.088
B
A

MT
16.1

A B
C D

7.1

1.2 0.6

A B
3.70 1.2

Foundation center line from B = 3.55 m


Load center line from B = 2.8 m
Factored load only due to backfill weight = 14198.70 KN
Factored load only due to foundation wt. = 3667.78 KN

Resistive Resultant
Moment Overturnin Net Moment reaction Base
g Moment Eccentricity
COMB V WRT point B ML (M ) (MR-MO) from B; x = (e) = b/2-x Base pressure
(MR) O
(MR-MO)/V pressure (Heel
(Toe side) side)
KN KN-m KN-m KN-m m m KN/m2 KN/m2
11 25536.91 109040.988 34359.819 74681.169 2.924 0.626 341.499 105.302
4 30575.78 123149.821 23413.470 99736.352 3.262 0.288 332.594 202.368
14 25278.21 108316.640 30671.137 77645.503 3.072 0.478 310.532 131.743
105.302 228.391 268.311 341.499

DESIGN OF TOE SLAB:


Moment calculation at abutment face;

Load Case Total Load (KN/m) Lever arm Moment


(m) (KN-m)

11 670.792 1.144 767.390


Wt. of slab -49.500 0.725 -35.876
Total 731.515

Design of foundation in flexure (toe side)

Grade of concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for ULS


Design moment = 731.51 KN-m (for 1m width)
Width of section = 1 m
Depth of section = (at face) 1.2 m
Depth of section = (at edge) 0.6 m
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
"E" value of concrete = 31000 Mpa
Design compressive strength of concrete =
fcd=afck/gm = 13.40 Mpa Where, 8 = 0.67
8m = 1.5
Design peak strength of steel = fy/8s = 434.783 Mpa Where, 8s = 1.15
Concrete failure strain = Ôcu1 = 0.0035 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Concrete limiting strain = 8c2 = 0.002 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.00218
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87fy/Es+0.002) = 0.00418

Reinforcement provided: 25 mm dia.


100 mm c/c distance
Total reinforcement provided = 5397 mm2
Clear cover = 75 mm
Effective depth "d" = 1112.5 mm
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb )= 217.37 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.018 mm
Stress in steel = 434.783 Mpa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 507.3 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 90.428 mm from most compressed surface
Moment of resistance, Mu = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =
or, Mu =σst*Ast*(d-0.416*xu) = 2398.259 OK
CHECK FOR SHEAR IN FOUNDATION TOE SIDE (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

Shear force should be checked at a distance d from abutment face

2.2

1.2

0.6

3.70 1.2 1.1125

105.302 228.391 268.311 305.321 341.499

1.0875

Moment calculation at 'd' distance fron abutment face;

Shear force
at "d"
Load Case Total Load (KN/m) Lever arm Moment distance
(m) (KN-m) from face
(KN)

11 351.709 0.554 194.807 351.709


Wt. of slab -20.350 0.725 -14.749 -20.350
Total 180.058 331.359

Total depth at a distance 'd' from abutment face = 897 mm


Effective depth at a distance 'd' from abutment face = 809 mm

Design Shear Force = 331.359 KN

The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c =
=[0.12K(80r1.fck)0.33+0.15scp]bw.d

Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0
So, K = 1.424
81 = Asl/bw.d
Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 5397 mm2
bw = Width of section = 1000 mm
d= 809 mm
81 = 0.0067
8cp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
Ac = Cross Sectional area of concrete
8cp = 0
So,VRd.c = 345.22 KN

Now, VRd.c minimum = (nmin+0.158cp)bw.d


where 8min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.289
So, VRd.c minimum = 233.419 KN
So, governing shear resistance = 345.22 KN OK, Safe in shear
DESIGN OF HEEL SLAB:
Moment calculation at abutment face;

Load Case Total Load (KN/m) Lever arm Moment Shear force
(m) (KN-m) at face (KN)

11 617.331 1.623 1001.638 617.331


Wt. of slab -83.250 0.725 -60.336 -83.250
Earth Wt. above slab -638.324 1.850 -1180.899 -638.324
Total -239.598 -104.243

Design of foundation in flexure (heel side)

Section is checked for ULS


Design moment = -239.60 KN-m (for 1m width)
239.598 KN-m Moment downword
Reinforcement provided: 20 mm dia.
100 mm c/c distance
Total reinforcement provided = 3140 mm2
Clear cover = 75 mm
Effective depth "d" = 1115 mm
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb )= 126.47 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.031 mm
Stress in steel = 434.783 Mpa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 508.44 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 52.612 mm from most compressed surface
Moment of resistance, Mu = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =
or, Mu =σst*Ast*(d-0.416*xu) = 1450.390 OK

CHECK FOR SHEAR IN FOUNDATION HEEL SIDE (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

3.7

105.302 191.298 228.391

1.115

Moment calculation at "d" distance from abutment face;

Shear force
Lever arm at "d"
Load Case Total Load (KN/m) distance
(m) from face
(KN)

11 383.355 1.168 383.355


Wt. of slab -52.314 0.862 -52.314
Earth Wt. above slab -445.964 1.293 -445.964
Total -114.923

Total depth at a distance 'd' from abutment face = 1019 mm


Effective depth at a distance 'd' from abutment face = 932 mm
Design Shear Force = -114.923 KN
114.923 KN Downword direction
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c =
=[0.12K(8081.fck)0.33+0.158cp]bw.d

Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0
So, K = 1.463
81 = Asl/bw.d
Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 3140 mm2
bw = Width of section = 1000 mm
d= 931.5 mm
81 = 0.0034
8cp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
Ac = Cross Sectional area of concrete
8cp = 0
So,VRd.c = 326.09 KN

Now, VRd.c minimum = (8min+0.158cp)bw.d


where 8min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.30057405
So, VRd.c minimum = 279.985 KN
So, governing shear resistance = 326.09 KN OK, Safe in shear

CHECK FOR PUNCHING SHEAR FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT


(Clause 10.4, IRC:112-2011, page-98)
a
Basic Control
Perimeter u1
2d
b
Reduced Control
Perimeter

Face of loaded area


Abutment Shaft

Punching shear is to be checked at distance "2d" from abutment shaft face


Now from abutment shaft, Maximum Vertical design force, VEd = 9956.71 KN
Corresponding longitudinal design moment, ML u = 17879.37 KN-m
Longitudinal eccentricity, el = 1.796 m
Corresponding transeverse design moment, MTu = 3509.19 KN-m
Transeverse eccentricity, et = 0.352 m

As the basic control perimeter is exceeding the foundation dimension, we will check the
punching shear at reduced control perimeter.
b

a
a= 16.1 m
b= 5.65 m OK, Shear check at basic control perimeter
Now, b = 1+1.8√((el/a)2+(et/b)2) (8 = Factors accounting for effects of bending
= 1.230 moment and axial load acting on loaded area)
Now, reduced control perimeter, u = 50 m

So, total load for punching shear = Load from abutment shaft+ Wt. within reduced control perimeter
VEd = 12003.425 KN
Shear stress, ƬEd = 8VEd/ud = 0.365 Mpa

Punching shear check at face of abutment shaf

a= 16.10 m
b= 1.2 m
Now, 8 = 1+1.8√((el/a)2+(et/b)2) (8 = Factors accounting for effects of bending
= 1.566 moment and axial load acting on loaded area)
Now, reduced control perimeter, u = 34.600 m

So, total load for punching shear = Load from abutment shaft
VEd = 9956.71 KN
Shear stress,ƬEd = 8VEd/ud = 0.557 Mpa

Calculation for punching shear resistance at reduced control perimeter

Maximum punching shear resistance, 8Rd.max = (1/2).8.fcd


where, 8 = 0.6[1-fck/310]
= 0.542 (Eq. 10.6, IRC:112-2011. page-90)
So, 8Rd.max = 3.631 Mpa

Again, Minimum punching shear resistance, 8min .2d/a=


where 8min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.289
a= distance from the face of column to control perimeter
= 1.618 m
Minimum punching shear resistance = 0.289 Mpa

Now punching shear resistance, 8Rd = 0.12K(808lfck)1/3.2d/a


where, 8l = √(8ll.8lt) = 0.335
So, 8Rd = 1.589 Mpa
So, governing 8Rd = 1.589 Mpa OK

Punching shear resistance at face

Punching shear resistance at face, 8Rd = 0.18/8cK(808lfck)1/3+(0.18cp)>=8min+0.18cp


Here, 8cp = 0
So, 8Rd = 1.589
8min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.289
So, governing shear resistance, 8Rd = 1.589 Mpa OK
I. DESIGN OF FOUNDATION (SLS)

COMB LOAD CASE Vu (KN) MLu (KN-m) MTu (KN-m) HLu (KN) HTu(KN)
11 MLmax 20787.227 17635.974 1670.951 4986.449 104.125
4 Vmax 21345.253 16152.743 468.990 4774.962 0.000
14 Vmin 20237.297 17352.240 667.372 4930.636 -104.125

Area
x of foundation base = 114.31 m2
Section modulus longitudinal direction; ZL = 135.267 m3
Section modulus longitudinal direction; ZT = 306.732 m3

ML D
2.5875 C A B 1.1125 1.0875

2=0

16.100
MT
.

A B
C D
7.1
3.70 1.2 2.20

1.2
0.6

Foundation center line from B = 3.55 m


Load center line from B = 2.8 m
Load center line from base center = 0.75 m
Factored load only due to foundation wt. = 2716.88 KN
Resistive Overturni Resultant Base
Moment ng Net Moment reaction Base
Eccentricity pressure pressure
COMB V WRT point B Moment (MR-MO) from B; x = (e) = b/2-x (Toe side) (Heel
(MR) ML (MO) (MR-MO)/V side)

KN KN-m KN-m KN-m m m KN/m2 KN/m2


11 20787.23 83433.096 17635.97 65797.121 3.165 0.3847 240.974 122.725
4 21345.25 84995.567 16152.74 68842.824 3.225 0.3248 237.984 135.478
14 20237.30 81893.291 17352.24 64541.051 3.189 0.3608 231.016 123.061

122.725 184.348 204.333


240.974

CHECK FOR TOE SLAB:


Moment calculation at abutment face (considering 1m width);
A
Shear
force at
Load Case Total Load (KN/m) Moment Shear force "d"
Lever arm (m) (KN-m) at face (KN) distance
from face
(KN)

11 489.838 1.130 553.600 489.838 242.136


Wt. of slab -49.500 1.100 -54.450 -49.500 -24.469
Total 499.150 440.338 217.667

Stress level check:

Grade of concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for SLS


Design moment = 499.15 KN-m (for 1m width)
Width of section = 1 m
Depth of section = (at face) 1.2 m
Depth of section = (at edge) 0.6 m
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
"E" value of concrete = 31000 Mpa
Modular ratio in tension = 9.333
Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48fck = 14.4 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
x allowable stress in steel = 0.8f =
Maximum yk 400 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)

Total reinforcement provided = 5397 mm2


Effective depth "d" = 1112.5 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 288.17
CG of compressive force = 96.058 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 91.0 Mpa OK, within permissible limit


Total force = 491.1 KN
Stress in concrete = 3.4 Mpa OK, within permissible limit

Crack width check:

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(Ôsm-8cm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


8sm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
8cm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,

(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)


Where, ssc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 90.99 Mpa
ae = Es/Ecm = 6.451613
f
1 ct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa
rr.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.ef
Where, hc.ef = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2

B
Where, A = level of steel centroid
B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
d 81,82 = greater and lesser tensile strain

hc.eff

So, hc.eff = 218.75 mm


Ac.eff = h
218750 mm2
Now. 88.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.024671429
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5
Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+f/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

Where, 8 = diameter of bar = 25 mm c = clear cover = 75 mm


k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
So,Sr.max = 427.264 mm
And, 8sm-8cm = 0.000161311
Minimum value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000272978
So, governing value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.00027298

So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8sm-8cm) = 0.117 mm


Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
crack width within permissible limit

CHECK FOR HEEL SLAB:


Moment calculation at abutment face (considering 1m width);

Shear
force at
Moment Shear force "d"
Load Case Total Load (KN/m) Lever arm (m)
(KN-m) at face (KN) distance
from face
(KN)

11 568.086 1.726 980.657 568.086 397.276


Wt. of slab -83.250 1.850 -154.013 -83.250 -58.219
Earth Wt. above -638.324 -1180.899 -638.324 -446.395
slab 1.850
Total -354.255 -153.488 -107.338

A
Stress level check:

Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for SLS


Moment = -354.25 KN-m (for 1m width)
= 354.25 KN-m downword direction

Total reinforcement provided = 3140 mm2


Effective depth "d" = 1112.5 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 227.73 mm
CG of compressive force = 75.909 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 108.8 Mpa OK, within permissible limit


Total force = 341.7 KN
Stress in concrete = 3.0 Mpa OK, within permissible limit
Crack width check:

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8sm-8cm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


8sm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
8cm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,

(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)


Where, 8sc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 108.84 Mpa
8e = Es/Ecm = 6.451613
fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa
88.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.ef
Where, hc.ef = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2

2=0 Where, A = level of steel centroid


B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
d 81,82 = greater and lesser tensile strain

hc.eff

1
B

So, hc.eff = 218.75 mm


Ac.eff = 218750 mm2
Now. 88.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.014354286
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5

Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+8/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

Where, 8 = diameter of bar = 20 mm c = clear cover = 75 mm


k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
So,Sr.max = 491.863 mm
And, 8sm-8cm = 6.845E-05
Minimum value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000326512
So, governing value of 8sm - 8cm = 3.27E-04

So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8sm-8cm) = 0.161 mm


Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
crack width within permissible limit
Design of dirt wall

Grade of concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for ULS


Design moment (Non-Seismic) = 69.894 KN-m (for 1m width)
Design moment (Seismic) = 44.473 KN-m (for 1m width)
Width of xsection = 1 m
Depth of section = 0.4 m
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
2=0 "E" value of concrete = 31000 Mpa
Design compressive strength of concrete =
fcd=afck/gm = 13.40 Mpa Where, a = 0.67
gm = 1.5
Design peak strength of steel = fy/gs = 434.783 Mpa Where, gs = 1.15
Concrete failure strain = Ôcu1 = 0.0035 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Concrete limiting strain = Ôc2 = 0.002 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.00218
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87fy/Es+0.002) = 0.00418

Reinforcement provided: 12 mm dia.


100 mm c/c distance
Total reinforcement provided = 1130 mm2
Clear cover = 50 mm
Effective depth "d" = 344 mm
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb )= 45.53 mm
h
Actual strain in steel = 0.026 mm
Stress in steel = 434.783 Mpa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 156.864 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 18.940 mm from most compressed surface
Moment of resistance, Mu = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =
d
159.760 kN-m OK

CHECK FOR SHEAR IN RETURN WALL (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

Design Shear Force (Non-Seismic) = 56.967 KN (For 1m strip)


Design Shear Force (Seismic) = 37.571 KN (For 1m strip)
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c =
=[0.12K(80r1.fck)0.33+0.15scp]bw.d

Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0
So, K = 1.762
r1 = Asl/bw.d
Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 1130 mm2
bw = Width of section = 1000 mm
d= 344 mm
r1 = 0.0033
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
Ac = Cross Sectional area of concrete
scp = 0
So,VRd.c = 143.83 KN

Now, VRd.c minimum = (nmin+0.15scp)bw.d


where nmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.397
So, VRd.c minimum = 136.670 KN
So, governing shear resistance = 143.83 KN OK, Safe in shear
A
Serviceability Limit State check

For serviceability limit state, design moment = 69.894 KN-m

Modular ratio in tension = 9.33


Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48f ck = 14.4 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Maximum allowable stress in steel = 0.8f yk = 400 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)

Total reinforcement provided = 1130 mm2


Effective depth "d" = 344 mm
Netralhc.eff
axis depth = x = 75.30 mm
CG of compressive force = 25.099 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 193.89 Mpa OK, within permissible limit


Total force = 219.17 KN
Stress in concrete = 5.821 Mpa OK, within permissible limit

Crack width check:

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(Ôsm-Ôcm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


Ôsm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
Ôcm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,

(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)


Where, ssc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 193.89 Mpa
ae = Es/Ecm = 6.451613
1 fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa

B
rr.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.eff
Where, hc.eff = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2

Where, A = level of steel centroid


B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
B
Ô1,Ô2 = greater and lesser tensile strain

So, hc.eff = 140 mm


Ac.eff = 140000 mm2
Now. ρρ.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.008074
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5

Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+φ/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

Where, f = diameter of bar = 12 mm c = clear cover = 50 mm


k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
So,Sr.max = 422.654 mm
And, Ôsm-Ôcm = 0.000155
Minimum value of Ôsm - Ôcm = 0.000582
So, governing value of Ôsm - Ôcm = 0.0005817

So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(Ôsm-Ôcm) = 0.246 mm


Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
crack width within permissible limit
M. DESIGN OF RETURN WALL - II

Height of Return Wall = 8.889 m


Avarage Ground level = 1.2 m
top width = 0.3 m
bottom width = 0.6 m
toe width = 1.2 m
toe thickness at end = 0.6 m
toe thickness at junction = 0.6 m
heel width = 2.2 m
heel thickness at end = 0.6 m
heel thickness at junction = 0.6 m
Live load surcharge = 1.2 m
friction angle of backfill (φ) = 30 deg
inclination angle of backfill (α) = 0 deg
Angle of friction between wall & earth fill (δ) = 20 deg
backfill inclination with horizontal (i) = 0 deg
Density of soil = 20 kN/m3
unit wt of concrete = 25 kN/m3
coefficient of friction = 0.5
grade of concrete = 30 M
grade of steel = 500 Fe
modulus Of elasticity of steel = 200000 N/mm2
co-efficient Of active earth pressure = 0.297
clear cover of rainforcement = 75 mm
Allowable max bearing capacity = 150 kN/m2

0 0.3

8.889

heel side
toe side
1.2

0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6


2.2 0.6 1.2
4

Earth Pressure Coefficient:

cos(φ-α) = 0.866025 cosα = 1 cos(α+δ) = 0.93969262


sin(φ+δ) = 0.766044 sin(φ-ί) = 0.5 cos(α-ί) = 1
coefficient of earth pressure under normal condition is = 0.297

Force & Moment per unit length of wall:


Disturbing Resisting
Vert. Force Hortz. Force Lever arm moment moment
no. Details (kN) (kN) at toe (m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Vertical Forces
1 Straight portion of stem above backfill = 0 0 0
Inclined portion of stem upto junction = 31 1.60 49.734
Rectangular portion os stem upto junction = 62 1.20 74.601
stem below junction = 9 1.50 13.500
self wt. of toe slab = 18 0.6 10.800
self wt. of heel slab = 33 2.9 95.700
soil above toe = 4.32 0.6 2.592
soil above heel upto GL = 7.92 2.9 22.968
soil above GL = 338.316 2.9 981.116
soil above heel inclined portion of stem = 23.067 1.70 39.214

Horizontal Force
Earth Pressure due to surcharge = 63.43 4.4445 281.90
Active earth Pressure = 234.92 3.7 877.05

TOTAL = 526.87 298.35 1158.95 1290.23

CG distance from toe = 0.25 m


total base width = 4m
Eccentricity = 1.75 m ( + ) ve
CHECK
Allowable bearing capacity = 150 kN/m2
Max base pressure = 477.65 kN/m2 CHECK
Min base pressure = -214.21 kN/m 2
CHECK

A. Safety against Overturning


Resultant of vertical forces lies at a distance from toe = 2.45 m
Resisting moment about A = 1290.23 kN-m
Overturning moment about A = 1158.95 kN-m
Factor of Safety against Overturning = 1.1 <2, CHECK

B.Safety against Sliding


Forces causing sliding = 298.35 kN
Resisting force= mW = 628.153125 kN
Factor of Safety against Sliding = 2.1 >1.5, HENCE OK

1 DESIGN OF TOE SLAB

upward pressure at toe slab end = 477.65 kN/m2


minimum upward pressure = -214.21 kN/m2
upward pressure at toe slab and stem junction = 270.09 kN/m2

Moment Moment
due to due to
Lever arm upward downward
Upward Downward from the force (kN- force (kN-
SL Details force force section m) m)

1 upward soil pressure = 448.64 0.54 244.28


2 Self weight of Toe slab = = 18 0.6 10.80
3 Wt. of Soil above toe slab = = 4.32 0.6 2.59
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
"E" value of concrete = 32000 Mpa
Design compressive strength of concrete fcd=α fck/γm = 13.4 Mpa
Design peak strength of steel = fy/gs = 434.782609 Mpa
Concrete failure strain = εcu1 = 0.0035
Concrete limiting strain = εc2 = 0.002
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.002175
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87f y/Es+0.002) = 0.004175
Net Design moment at section = 230.886383 kN-m
Factored Design moment at section = 311.696618 kN-m

Assume bottom reinforcement 16 mm dia bar 250 mm c/c spacing.


clear cover = 75 mm
depth provided (deff) = 517 mm
Ast provided = 804.247719 mm2
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb ) = 32.3933109 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.0558603 mm
Stress in steel = 434.782609 mPa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 235.752 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 13.4756173 mm
Moment of resistance, Mu = 176.068842 kN-m Revise

CHECK FOR SHEAR (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

Maximum allowable Shear Force:-


Design Shear Force = 426.322 kN
Factored Design Shear Force = 575.535 kN
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c = 175.615 kN
Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0 r1 = Asl/bw.d = 0.00129634
So, K = 1.62 Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 804.247719 mm2
bw = Width of section = 1200 mm
d= 517 mm
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
scp = 0 Ac = Cross Sectional area of concrete = 400000 mm2
Now, VRd.c minimum = (nmin+0.15scp)bw.d = 217.600 kN
where nmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.3507
So, governing shear resistance = 217.599805 kN
< DESIGN SHEAR, SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED

Allowable shear force without reduction factor:


Ved <= 2252.652 kN (Eq. 10.5, cl: 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-89)
v = strength reduction factor = 0.542 OK

Force reduction factor:


β= αv / 2d but 0.5*d<= αv <= 2*d (cl: 10.3.3, IRC:112-2011, page-93)
= 0 αv = 0.6

Serviceability limit state check


Grade of concrete = 30 M
Grade of steel = 500 Fe
Width of section considered = 1.2 m
Section is checked for SLS
Design moment = 311.697 kN-m
Width of section = 1.2 m
Depth of section = 517 mm
"E" value of steel = 200000 mPa
"E" value of concrete = 32000 mPa
Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48fck = 14.4 mPa
(Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Maximum allowable stress in steel = 0.8fyk = 400 mPa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Total reinforcement provided = 804.247719 mm2
Effective depth "d" = 517 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 74.41 mm
CG of compressive force = 24.80 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 787.42 mPa REVISE


Total force = 633.28 kN
Stress in concrete = 17.021 mPa REVISE

DESIGN OF HEEL SLAB


upward pressure at toe slab end = 477.65 kN
minimum upward pressure = -214.21 kN
upward pressure at heel slab and stem junction = 166.31 kN

Moment Moment
due to due to
Lever arm upward downward
Upward Downward from the force (kN- force (kN-
SL Details force force section m) m)

1 upward soil pressure = 708.35 4.013 2842.57


2 Self weight of Heel slab = = 33 0.6 19.80
3 Wt. of Soil above Heel slab upto GL = 7.92 1.1 8.71
4 Wt. of Soil above Heel slab above GL = 338.32 1.1 372.15
5 Wt. of Soil above Heel slab at inclined portion of stem = 23.07 0.10 2.31

"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa


"E" value of concrete = 32000 Mpa
Design compressive strength of concrete fcd=α fck/γm = 13.4 Mpa
Design peak strength of steel = fy/gs = 434.782609 Mpa
Concrete failure strain = Ôcu1 = 0.0035
Concrete limiting strain = Ôc2 = 0.002
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.002175
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87f y/Es+0.002) = 0.004175
Net Design moment at section = 2439.61 kN-m
Factored Design moment at section = 3293.47 kN-m

Assume bottom reinforcement 16 mm dia bar 250 mm c/c spacing.


clear cover = 75 mm
depth provided (deff) = 517 mm
Ast provided = 804.248 mm2
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb ) = 32.393 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.056 mm
Stress in steel = 434.783 mPa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 235.752 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 13.4756173 mm
Moment of resistance, Mu = 176.068842 kN-m Revise

CHECK FOR SHEAR (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

Maximum allowable Shear Force:-


Design Shear Force = 306.05 kN
Factored Design Shear Force = 413.168931 kN
The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c = 263.593314 kN
Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0 r1 = Asl/bw.d = 0.00070709
So, K = 1.62 Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 804.247719 mm2
bw = Width of section = 2200 mm
d= 517 mm
scp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
scp = 0 A c
= Cross Sectional area of concrete = 720000 mm2
Now, VRd.c minimum = (nmin+0.15scp)bw.d = 398.932976 kN
where nmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.3507
So, governing shear resistance = 398.932976 kN
< DESIGN SHEAR, SHEAR REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED

Allowable shear force without reduction factor:


Ved <= 4306.85683 kN (Eq. 10.5, cl: 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-89)
v = strength reduction factor = 0.565 OK
x
Force reduction factor:
β= αv / 2d but 0.5*d<= αv <= 2*d (cl: 10.3.3, IRC:112-2011, page-93)
= 1 αv = 1.1

Serviceability limit state check


Grade of concrete = 30 M
Grade of steel = 500 Fe
Width of section considered = 2.2 m

Section is checked for SLS


Design moment = 3293.471 kN-m
Width of section = 2.2 m
Depth of section = 517 mm
"E" value of steel = 200000 mPa
"E" value of concrete = 32000 mPa
Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48fck = 14.4 mPa
h (Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Maximum allowable stress in steel = 0.8fyk = 400 mPa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Total reinforcement provided = 804.247719 mm2
Effective depth "d" = 517 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 56.08 mm
CG of compressive force = 18.69 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 8218.04 mPa REVISE


Total force = 6609.34 kN
Stress in concrete = 235.700 mPa REVISE

DESIGN OF STEM 0.3 7.7 m


section 1 2 3
1 height of the stem from stem junction (m) = 0 1.5 3 3m
2 stem height available at section (m) = 7.7 6.2 4.7
3 Depth of stem available (m) = 0.600 0.541 0.483
4 Effective Depth (mm) = 515 456 398
5 Force due to earth pressure surcharge (kN) = 54.87 44.16 33.46
6 Lever arm (m) = 3.8445 3.0945 2.3445
7 Moment due to surcharge at base (kN-m) = 210.93 136.66 78.44 1.5 m
8 Force due to Active earth pressure (kN) = 175.774 113.882 65.370
9 Lever arm (m) = 3.22938 2.59938 1.96938
10 Moment due to active EP at base (kN-m) = 567.64 296.02 128.74 0m
11 Design moment (kN-m) = 766.32 399.63 173.80 0.6
12 Diameter of bar (mm) = 20 20 20
13 spacing (mm) = 175 175 175
14 ast provided (mm2) = 1795.20 1795.20 1795.20
15 Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = 72.3 72.3 72.3
16 Actual strain in steel = 0.025 0.022 0.019
17 Stress in steel = 434.78 434.78 434.78
18 Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = A234.840 208.153 181.465
Under Under Under
check
19 Reinforced Reinforced Reinforced
20 CG of compressive force = 30.080 30.080 30.080
21 Moment of resistance, Mu = 378.49 332.81 287.13
22 check revise revise OK

CHECK FOR SHEAR:

1 design shear force (kN) = 311.363 213.360 133.418


2 K= 1.623 1.662 1.709
3 ρ1 = 0.002 0.003 0.001
4 σcp = 0 0 0
5 Vrd.c = 772.84 685.08 1866.26
6 Vmin = 0.351 0.364 0.379
7 Vrd.c min = 271.2 249.08 707.81
8 governing shear resistance = 772.8 685.1 1866.3
not not
9 shear reinforcement = required required not required
Section is checked for SLS
1 Netral axis depth = x (mm) = 115.68 100.79 83.72
2 CG of compressive force (mm) = 38.56 33.60 27.91
3 So, stress in steel (mPa) = 895.96 462.42 198.75
4 check = REVISE REVISE OK
5 Total force (kN) = 1608.418 830.139 356.802
6 Stress in concrete (mPa) = 27.809 16.473 8.524
7 check = REVISE REVISE OK
CHECK FOR CRACK WIDTH

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(εsm-εcm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


εsm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
εcm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,

(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)


SECTION 1 2 3
Where, σsc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 895.96 462.42 198.75 in mPa
αe = Es/Ecm = 6.25
fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa
ρr.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.eff
Where, hc.eff = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2

Where, A = level of steel centroid


B
B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
2=0
d ε1,ε2 = greater and lesser tensile strain

hc.eff

1

SECTION 1 2 3
So, hc.eff = 212.5 212.5 212.5 in mm
Ac.eff = 212500 212500 212500 in mm2
Now. ρr.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.008 0.008 0.008
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5
Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+φ/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

SECTION 1 2 3
Where,φ = diameter of bar = 20 20 20 in mm
c = clear cover = 75 mm
k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
SECTION 1 2 3
So,Sr.max = 657.463 657.463 657.463 in mm
And, εsm-εcm = 0.0037 0.0037 0.0037
Minimum value of εsm - εcm = 0.0026879 0.0013873 0.0005963
So, governing value of εsm - εcm = 0.0037009 0.0037009 0.0037009
So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(εsm-εcm) = 2.433 2.433 2.433 in mm
Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
Revise
CHECK FOR MINIMUM REINFORCEMENT: (According to chapter 16, IRC:112-2011, page-171)
MINMUM VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT PROVIDE
SECTION - 1 20 mm dia 175 mm c/c spacing
SECTION - 2 20 mm dia 175 mm c/c spacing
SECTION - 3 20 mm dia 175 mm c/c spacing
S-1 S-2 S-3
Total vertical reinforcement provided = mm2 1795.196 1795.196 1795.196
Concrete area, Ac = mm2 570737.417 512212.251 391474.83
Now, 0.0024Ac = mm2 1369.770 1229.309 939.540
check OK OK OK
and 0.04Ac = mm2 22829.5 20488.5 15659.0
check OK OK OK

HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT PROVIDE


SECTION - 1 12 mm dia 200 mm c/c spacing
SECTION - 2 12 mm dia 200 mm c/c spacing
SECTION - 3 12 mm dia 200 mm c/c spacing
S-1 S-2 S-3
Total horizontal reinforcement provided = mm2 565.49 565.49 565.49
25% of vertical steel = mm2 448.80 448.80 448.80
and 0.001Ac = mm2 570.7 512.2 391.5
check REVISE OK OK

REINFORCEMENT PROVIDE AT BOTTOM 16 mm dia 250 mm c/c spacing


(According to cl. 16.5.1, IRC:112-2011, page-175)
min. reinforcement shall be .13% of concrete c/s area at the bottom of slab = 600000 mm2
required reinforcement = 780 mm2
reinforcement provided = 804.247719 mm2
OK

REINFORCEMENT PROVIDE AT TOP 16 mm dia 250 mm c/c spacing

min. reinforcement shall be .13% of concrete c/s area at the top of slab = 600000 mm2
required reinforcement = 780 mm2
reinforcement provided = 804.247719 mm2
OK

MINIMUM DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED:


(According to cl. 16.6.1, IRC:112-2011, page-181)

minimum distribution bar shall be 20% of the main reinforcement = 160.849544 mm2
Provide 12 mm dia 250 mm c/c spacing
reinforcement provided = 452.389342 mm2
OK
RETURN WALL DESIGN

Height of return wall = 8.221 m


Length of return wall = 4m
Coefficient of horizontal active earth pressure = 0.279
Earth pressure at bottom of wall = 45.873 KN/m2
Eart pressure at 1m above wall bottom = 40.293 KN/m2
Average eatrh
x pressure in 1m strip = 43.083 KN/m
Surcharge earth pressure equivalent to earth pressure of 1.2 m height = 6.696 KN/m2
Bending moment at wall junction due to earth pressure, M1 = 344.665 KN-m
2=0
Bending moment at wall junction due to surcharge earth pressure, M2 = 53.568 KN-m
Design moment at junction, Mu = 1.5M1+1.2M2 = 581.280 KN-m
Design shear force at junction, Fu = 1.5F1+1.2F2 = 290.640 KN
Design of return wall in flexure

4m

0.7 m

Grade of concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
Width of section considered = 1m

Section is checked for ULS


Design moment = 581.280 KN-m (for 1m width)
Width of section = 1 m
Depth of section = 0.7 m
"E" value of steel = 200000 Mpa
"E" value of concrete = 32000 Mpa
Design compressive strength of concrete =
fcd=afck/gm = 13.40 Mpa Where, 8 = 0.67
h 8m = 1.5
Design peak strength of steel = fy/8s = 434.783 Mpa Where, 8s = 1.15
Concrete failure strain = Ôcu1 = 0.0035 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Concrete limiting strain = 8c2 = 0.002 (Table 6.5, IRC:112-2011, page-38)
Yield strain of steel = 0.87fy/Es = 0.00218
Limiting strain of steel = (0.87fy/Es+0.002) = 0.00418

Reinforcement provided: 25 mm dia.


125 mm c/c distance
Total reinforcement provided = 4416 mm2
Clear cover = 50 mm
Effective depth "d" = 637.5 mm
Actual Neutral Axis depth xu = (0.87fyAst )/(0.36fckb )= 177.85 mm
Actual strain in steel = 0.013 mm
Stress in steel = 434.783 Mpa
Balanced Neutral Axis depth xu,max = 290.7 mm
So, Section is under reinforced, ok
CG of compressive force = 73.986 mm from most compressed surface
Moment of resistance, Mu = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =
1081.855 OK

CHECK FOR SHEAR IN RETURN WALL (Clause 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011, page-88)

Design Shear Force = 290.640 KN

The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement, V Rd.c =
=[0.12K(80r1.fck)0.33+0.15scp]bw.d

Where, K = 1+√(200/d)<=2.0
So, K = 1.560
81 = Asl/bw.d
Where Asl = Area of steel provided = 4416 mm2
bw = Width of section = 1000 mm
d= A 637.5 mm
81 = 0.0069
8cp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd, where, NEd = Axial compressive force = 0
Ac = Cross Sectional area of concrete
8cp = 0
So,VRd.c = 301.76 KN

Now, VRd.c minimum = (nmin+0.158cp)bw.d


where 8min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.331
So, VRd.c minimum = 210.929 KN
So, governing shear resistance = 301.76 KN OK, Safe in shear

Serviceability Limit State check

For serviceability limit state, design momeny = M1+0.8M2 = 387.520 KN-m

Modular ratio in tension = 9.333333


Concrete failure strain = 0.0035
Maximum allowable stress in concrete = 0.48fck = 14.4 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.1(1), IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Maximum allowable stress in steel = 0.8fyk = 400 Mpa
(Clause 12.2.2, IRC:112-2011, page-120)
Total reinforcement provided = 4416 mm2
Effective depth "d" = 637.5 mm
Netral axis depth = x = 191.69 mm
CG of compressive force = 63.897 mm from most compressed surface
Now moment, M = (Stress in steel)x(area of steel)x(d-CG of compressive force) =

So, stress in steel = 153.00 Mpa OK, within permissible limit


Total force = 675.59 KN
Stress in concrete = 7.049 Mpa OK, within permissible limit

Crack width check:

Crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8 sm-8cm) Where, Sr.max = Maximum crack spacing


8sm = mean strain in the reinforcement under the relavant combination of loads
8cm = mean strain in the concrete between cracks.

Now,

(Eq. 12.6, IRC:112-2011, page-125)


Where, 8sc = stress in the tension reinforcement = 153.00 Mpa
8 e = Es/Ecm = 6.25
1fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of concrete = 2.5 Mpa
8r.eff = As/Ac.eff Where, Ac.eff = Effective area of concrete in tension, surrounding
the reinforcement of depth hc.ef
Where, hc.ef = lesser of the followings
2.5(h-d);(h-x/3);or h/2

B
Where, A = level of steel centroid
B = Effective tension area, Ac.eff
d 81,82 = greater and lesser tensile strain

hc.eff

So, hc.eff = 156.25 mm


Ac.eff = 156250 mm2
Now. 88.eff = As/Ac.eff = 0.02826
kt = factor dependant on duration of the load may be taken as 0.5
Now in situations where spacing of bonded reinforcement within the tension zone is reasonably
close (i.e <=5(c+f/2)), the maximum crack spacing,

Where, 8 = diameter of bar = 25 mm c = clear cover = 50 mm


k1 = co-efficient taking acount of bond properties of reinforcement = 0.8
k2 = co- efficient taking account of distribution of strain = 0.5
So,Sr.max = 320.389 mm
And, 8sm-8cm = 0.000505
Minimum value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000459
So, governing value of 8sm - 8cm = 0.000505

So, crack width, Wk = Sr.max(8sm-8cm) = 0.162 mm


Maximum crack width = 0.3 mm (Table 12.1, IRC:112-2011, page-122)
crack width within permissible limit
Summarized Reinforcement Detailing
(According to chapter 16, IRC:112-2011, page-171)
ABUTMENT SHAFT

Total vertical reinforcement provided = 8279 mm2


Concrete area, Ac = 1200000 mm2
Now, 0.0024Ac = 2880 mm2 < steel provided, OK
and 0.04Ac = 48000 mm2 >steel provided, OK

Horizontal Reinforcement provide 16 mm dia. @


125 mm c/c.
Total horizontal reinforcement provided = 1608 mm2
Now 25% of vertical steel = 1035 mm2 < steel provided, OK
(For one face)
and 0.001Ac = 1200 mm2 OK < steel provided, OK

Transverse reinforcement provided =


Now, 0.02Ac = 24000 mm2
> steel provided,No transeverse reinforcement required

Vertical reinforcement provided =


25 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c.
Horizontal reinforcement provided =
16 mm dia @ 125 mm c/c.

Ductile detailing of shaft (According to chapter 17, IRC:112-2011, page-192)

Maximum axial force, seismic case: VEd = 9300.25 KN


Normalised axial force for seismic case, hk = 0.016 < 0.08
Now provide cross ties of 10 mm dia.
Maximum spacing ties in the longitudinal direction, S Lmax = Minimum of
= 5 x dia. Of long. Bar = 125 mm
and 1/5 times of smallest dia of confined core = 220 mm
(As per clause 17.2.1.3, IRC:112-2011, page-195, SL ≤ 5 times dia. Of smallest
longitudinal bar, SL ≤ 1/5 times smallest dimension of confined core for
rectengular section)
Provide spacing of ties in longitudinal direction, S L = 125 mm
Longitudinal direction
Provide total 128 nos. in transeverse direction (spacing = 125 mm c/c)
Area of stirrups provided: Asw = 10048 mm2
Dimension of concrete core perpendicular to direction considered: b =
15850 mm
Volumetric ratio of transeverse reinforcement: r w = Asw/SL.b 0.00507
Confine reinforcement ratio: vwd = rwfyd/fcd = 0.1646
Minimum confining reinforcement ratio: vwd = max[vvreq;0.12]
(Eq. 17.5, IRC:112-2011, page-194)

Where,
So, vv.req = -0.0061862
So, vvd = 0.12 < provided, OK
Buckling of longitudinal compression reinforcement

Spacing of ties in transeverse direction: St = 125.000 mm


< 200, OK
< 1/3 of smallest dimension of concrete core, OK
(clause 17.2.1.3, IRC:112-2011, page-195)
Now, At = steel area of one tie leg = 78.5 mm2
No. of longitudinal bars restrained by 1 tie = 2
Sum of areas of total longitudinal bars restrained by tie = SA s = 981.25 mm2

Now, minimum amount of transeverse tie;

Where, fyt = yield strength of tie


Where, fys = yield strength of longitudinal reinforcement
So, area of tie reinforcement required; At = 76.66015625 mm2 < provided, OK

Potential plastic hinge: Lh = 2.04 m


Provide these reinforcements upto 2.5 m

FOUNDATION SLAB
Reinforcement of toe slab
Main reinforcement provided 25 mm dia. 100 mm c/c
Steel in 1m strip = 4906.25 mm2
As.min =( 0.26fctm/fyk)btd= 1446.25 mm2 OK
or, 0.0013btd = 1446.25 mm 2
OK
Reinforcement of heel slab
Main reinforcement provided 20 mm dia. 100 mm c/c
Steel in 1m strip = 3140 mm 2

As.min =( 0.26fctm/fyk)btd= 1446.25 mm2 OK


or, 0.0013btd = 1446.25 mm 2
OK
Calculation of distrubution reinforcement
Top bar at toe slab 20 mm dia. 200 mm c/c
Steel in 1m strip = 1570 mm 2
OK
25% of main steel = 1226.5625
Bottom bar at heel slab 25 mm dia. 200 mm c/c
Steel in 1m strip = 2453.125 mm 2
OK
25% of main steel = 785
Transverse reinforcement provided at bottom and at top
16 mm dia. 150 mm c/c
Steel in 1m strip = 1339.73333 mm 2

OK
Provide surface reinforcement 16 mm dia. 2 Nos. each face
RETURN WALL
Main reinforcement provided 25 mm dia. 125 mm c/c
Distributor reinforcement 16 mm dia. 125 mm c/c
OK
DIRT WALL
Provide main reinforcement 12 mm dia. 100 mm c/c
Distributor reinforcement 10 mm dia. 125 mm c/c
OK

You might also like