Compedium
Compedium
Compedium
Born August 9, 1896, Neuchâtel, Switzerland—died September 16, 1980, Geneva. Jean
Piaget is a swiss psychologist who was the first to make a systematic study of the acquisition of
understanding in children. He is thought by many to have been the major figure in 20th-century
developmental psychology.
MATURATION THEORY
The maturation theory states that Children would be ready to read when they have
developed certain prerequisite skills and there is little that teachers and parents can do to hurry the
process of cognitive development. In other ways, the theory advocate for not teaching reading until
children were mature enough for instruction. Scholars for this theory hypothesized that this could
happen when children were at mental age of 6 1/2. Aldridge & Goldman (2007) noted that the
Maturational Theory of child development was developed by Arnold Gesell with his colleagues
including Morphette and Washburne who constructed a set of behavioral norms that illustrate
sequential and predictable patterns of growth and development. Gesell contended that all children
go through similar stages, although each child may move through these stages at their own rate
(Godwin, Herb, Ricketts & Wymer, 2013).
DONALD HOLDAWAY
Donald Holdaway was born on 1930 and died in 2004. He is the father of the big book and
the founder of “Shared Reading” and the developer of the Natural Learning Model. He worked in
New Zealand and Australia with students who lacked reading abilities developed the best way to
teach Malread students. His work really helped a lot of malread children in the world.
a) Observation -which demand that children need to have the opportunity to observe literacy
behaviours from others. For example, parents and siblings to read for them.
b) Collaboration – this require that children need to interact with others who provide
encouragement and help with the reading process.
c) Practice – children need the opportunity to practice alone in order to self-evaluate, make
corrections and increase their skills independently.
d) Performance – children need the opportunity to share their new reading skills with those
who support them.
LESLEY MANDEL MORROW
Lesley Mandel Morrow is a Professor of Literacy at Rutgers University's Graduate School
of Education, where she is Chair of the Department of Learning and Teaching. She began her
career as a classroom teacher, then became a reading specialist and later received her PhD from
Fordham University in New York City. Her area of research deals with early literacy development,
and the organization and management of Language Arts Programs. Her research is carried out with
children and families from diverse backgrounds.
SHARED READING
Shared reading is “an interactive reading experience that occurs when students join in or
share the reading of a book or other text while guided and supported by a teacher. The teacher
explicitly models the skills of proficient readers, including reading with fluency and expression.”
It is a method of teaching reading that allows for students to be supported while reading a leveled
text just above their reading level. It can be used to teach all reading strategies including decoding,
fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary, and it is an appropriate activity for all grade levels, but
should especially be done in the primary classroom.
Brenda Parkes says that “shared reading is to provide children with an enjoyable reading
experience, to introduce them to a variety of authors and illustrators…and to entice them to want
to be readers themselves.” Another purpose “is to teach children systematically and explicitly how
to be readers and writers themselves.”
Essentially, during shared reading, you are reading a book WITH your students as they
chime in. You are demonstrating comprehension and word solving strategies and showing them
what it looks like to be a reader.
Like interactive read alouds and guided reading, shared reading is an important aspect of
any balanced literacy program. While interactive read alouds support comprehension and provide
a fluent reading model, shared reading is an interactive experience where students help you read
and learn strategies right along with you.
JAMES ASHER
Dr. James J. Asher, a professor of psychology and former associate dean at San Jose State
University, has degrees in psychology from the University of New Mexico and the University of
Houston with postdoctoral training at the University of Washington (Linguistics), Standford
University (Research in Educational Psychology), and the Defense Language Institute West Coast
(Arabic). His research into language acquisition has been funded by grants from the Office of
Education, the Office of Naval Research, the Department of Defense, and the State of California.
MONTESSORI
Montessori is a method of education that is based on self-directed activity, hands-on
learning and collaborative play. In Montessori classrooms children make creative choices in their
learning, while the classroom and the highly trained teacher offer age-appropriate activities to
guide the process. Children work in groups and individually to discover and explore knowledge of
the world and to develop their maximum potential.
Every material in a Montessori classroom supports an aspect of child development, creating
a match between the child’s natural interests and the available activities. Children can learn
through their own experience and at their own pace. They can respond at any moment to the natural
curiosities that exist in all humans and build a solid foundation for life-long learning.
Above all, Montessori classrooms at all levels nurture each child’s individual strengths and
interests. Montessori education encourages children to explore their world, and to understand and
respect the life forms, systems and forces of which it consists. It all starts with a trained teacher.
SAMUEL WILDERSPIN
Samuel Wilderspin was born March 23, 1791, in a working-class neighborhood of London,
England. He was the only child of Alexander Wilderspin, a printing shop worker, and wife Ann
Wilderspin. On April 10, 1791, Wilderspin was baptized at the Swedenborgian Chapel in London.
He grew up in Hornsey, near an aqueduct that diverted water into the city of London and played
in the grassy, nature-filled banks alongside the artificial waterway. He also spent time exploring
the nearby woods, observing the animals he encountered there. These experiences had a lasting
influence; when he later worked as a teacher, he would take his young student outdoors to play
and to study the plants and animals.
INPUT HYPOTHESIS
The input hypothesis posits the process that allows second language learners to move
through the predictable sequence of the acquisition of grammatical structures predicted by the
natural order hypothesis. According to the input hypothesis, second language learners require
comprehensible input, represented by i+1, to move from the current level of acquisition,
represented by i, to the next level of acquisition. Comprehensible input is input that contains a
structure that is “a little beyond” the current understanding—with understanding defined as
understanding of meaning rather than understanding of form—of the language learner. Learners
progress in their knowledge of the language when they comprehend language input that is slightly
more advanced than their current level. Krashen called this level of input "i+1", where "i" is the
learner's interlanguage and "+1" is the next stage of language acquisition.
LOUISE ROSENBLATT
Louise Rosenblatt (b. 1904–d. 2005) was a highly influential thinker in literary and critical
theory, reading pedagogy, and education. She was professor of education at New York University
from 1948 until 1972, and she continued to teach for many years at other universities. The impact
of her writings extends to aesthetics, communication and media studies, and cultural studies. Her
transactional theory of reading literature earned a permanent place among methodologies applied
to the study of reader comprehension and improving the teaching of reading, from preschool to
college-age years. She is most widely known for her “reader response” theory of literature. The
process of reading is a dynamic transaction between the reader and the text, in which meaningful
ideas arise for readers from their own thoughtful and creative interpretations.
PEER ASSESSMENT
Peer assessment or peer review provides a structured learning process for students to
critique and provide feedback to each other on their work. It helps students develop lifelong skills
in assessing and providing feedback to others, and also equips them with skills to self-assess and
improve their own work.
In peer assessment, a collaborative learning technique, students evaluate their peers’ work
and have their work evaluated by peers.
Often used as a learning tool, peer assessment gives students feedback on the quality of
their work, often with ideas and strategies for improvement. At the same time, evaluating peers’
work can enhance the evaluators’ own learning and self-confidence. Peer involvement
personalizes the learning experience, potentially motivating continued learning.
When used in grading, peer assessment can give the instructor needed information on
student performance. Especially for large online classes, it may allow inclusion of assignments
where students’ creative work could not be graded reliably through automation or efficiently by
teaching staff.
Peer assessment techniques vary considerably, and are often best understood through
example. To give effective, valid and reliable feedback to fellow learners, students need clear
guidelines, training on assessment criteria and scoring rules, and practice with examples. Before
students are ready to give feedback to others, their assessments should be compared to staff-
grading of the same examples for quality assurance.
STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT
Student self-assessment describes the process in which each student evaluates his or her
own progress or performance. This can take the form of “I can” statements, learner contracts,
reflections, portfolio reviews, and recording oneself. Research has shown that using self-
assessment with students can positively effect self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation levels in
students Student self-assessment involves students in evaluating their own work and learning
progress.
Self-assessment is a valuable learning tool as well as part of an assessment process.
Through self-assessment, students can:
identify their own skill gaps, where their knowledge is weak
see where to focus their attention in learning
set realistic goals
revise their work
track their own progress
if online, decide when to move to the next level of the course
This process helps students stay involved and motivated and encourages self-reflection and
responsibility for their learning.
You should set clear expectations for student performance. As in peer assessment, you
need to coach students on assessment criteria and how to apply them in grading their work. Give
them practice assessing themselves.
A valuable process on its own, self-assessment may be paired with peer assessment.
Applying knowledge gained through peer assessment, students’ self-assessment can be a potent
next step in actively promoting their own learning and achievement.
Having students complete self-assessments and peer assessments is a valuable process.
With the assistance of the assessment methods mentioned above, students are able to evaluate their
performance as well as that of their peers. Through this reflective process, students may become
more aware of their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of familiarity with the content, their
learning styles, and learning strategies. This also helps the teacher assess exactly where students
feel their weaknesses and strengths lie, and therefore help the teacher to focus review work.
EDGAR DALE
Edgar Dale (April 27, 1900 – March 8, 1985) was a U.S. educationist who developed the
famous Cone of Experience. Dale was a professor of education at University. He made several
contributions to audio and visual instruction, including a methodology for analyzing the content
of motion pictures Edgar Dale, an expert in audiovisual education, created a model in his 1946
book Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching that he named the Cone of Experience to discuss various
modalities/channels of imparting information. . The cone of experience given by Edgar dale has
rightly said that it is not offered as a perfect or mechanically flaw less picture to be taken with
absolute literalness in its simplified form. It is merely a visual aid to explain the interrelationships
of various types of audiovisual materials, as well as their individual positions in learning process
His cone did not refer to learning or retention at all, instead modelling levels of abstraction: words
being the most abstract in his model, at the top of the cone, and real-life experiences the most
concrete, and at the base of the cone.
CONE OF EXPERIENCE
Dale’s Cone of Experience is a visual model that is composed of eleven (11) stages starting
from concrete experiences at the bottom of the cone then it becomes more and more abstract as it
reach the peak of the cone. Also, according to Dale, the arrangement in the cone is not based on
its difficulty but rather based on abstraction and on the number of senses involved. The experiences
in each stages can be mixed and are interrelated that fosters more meaningful learning.
JOHN BOWLBY
John Bowlby (February 27, 1907 - September 2, 1990) was a British psychologist and
psychoanalyst who believed that early childhood attachments played a critical role in later
development and mental functioning. His work, along with the work of psychologist Mary
Ainsworth, contributed to the development of attachment theory.
Bowlby believed that children are born with a biologically-programmed tendency to
seek and remain close to attachment figures. This provides nurturance and comfort, but it
also aids in the child’s survival. Sticking close to a caregiver ensures that the child’s needs
are met and that he or she is protected from dangers in the environment.
ATTACHMENT THEORY
Bowlby believed that early relationships with caregivers play a major role in child
development and continue to influence social relationships throughout life.
Bowlby's attachment theory suggested that children are born with an innate need to form
attachments. Such attachments aid in survival by ensuring that the child receives care and
protection. Not only that, but these attachments are characterized by clear behavioral and
motivational patterns. In other words, both children and caregivers engage in behaviors designed
to ensure proximity. Children strive to stay close and connected to their caregivers who in turn
provide a safe haven and a secure base for exploration.
Researchers have also expanded upon Bowlby's original work and have suggested that a
number of different attachment styles exist. Children who receive consistent support and care are
more likely to develop a secure attachment style, while those who receive less reliable care may
develop an ambivalent, avoidant, or disorganized style.
ALBERT BANDURA
Albert Bandura is an influential social cognitive psychologist who is perhaps best
known for his social learning theory, the concept of self-efficacy, and his famous Bobo doll
experiments. He is a Professor Emeritus at Stanford University and is widely regarded as one
of the greatest living psychologists.
One 2002 survey ranked him as the fourth most influential psychologist of the
twentieth century, behind only B.F. Skinner, Sigmund Freud, and Jean Piaget.
SOCIAL-LEARNING THEORY
Social learning theory is based on the work of psychologist Albert Bandura. Bandura
believed that the conditioning and reinforcement process could not sufficiently explain all of
human learning. For example, how can the conditioning process account for learned behaviors that
have not been reinforced through classical conditioning or operant conditioning?
According to social learning theory, behaviors can also be learned through observation and
modeling. By observing the actions of others, including parents and peers, children develop new
skills and acquire new information.
Bandura's child development theory suggests that observation plays a critical role in
learning, but this observation does not necessarily need to take the form of watching a live
model. Instead, people can also learn by listening to verbal instructions about how to perform a
behavior as well as through observing either real or fictional characters display behaviors in books
or films.
REFERENCES:
Aldridge, j. & R. L. Goldman (2007). Current Issues and Trends in Education. Boston:
Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of the written Language. 2nd
Ed. USA. Blackwell Publishing.
Campbell, S. R., & Zazkis, R. (2002). Toward number theory as a conceptual field. In S.
R. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.) Learning and teaching number theory: Research in
cognition and instruction (pp. 1-14). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Godwin, E., Herb, B., Ricketts, A. & Wymer, S. (2013). Theories of Literacy
Development 1930s – Present Day. Available at
http//:hillerspires.wikispaces.com/file/view/Theories%
Lilly, E. & Green, C. (2004). Developing Partnerships with Families through Children’s
Literature. Boston: Pearson Allyn Bacon Prentice Hall
http://www.education.com/reference/article/early-literacy/
http//:hillerspires.wikispaces.com/file/view/Theories%2Bof%2BLiteracy%2BDevelopm
entm
Vygotsky LS. Thought and Language. Kozulin A, trans. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press;
1986. (Original work published in 1934)
Vygotsky LS. Thinking and Speech. Minick N, trans. New York: Plenum Press; 1987.
Student development theory chart. (2007). Retrieved from
http://studentaffairs.webs.com/collegeimpact.htm
William perry's scheme of intellectual and ethical development. (n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www.jmu.edu/geology/evolutionarysystems/protected/handouts/willperry2.pdf
Gutaa, B.S. & Tarekegne, W.M. (2018). The Contribution of Pre-School Education
toStudents' Academic Achievement in first cycle Primary Schools of Ethiopia.
International Journal of Educational Researchers , 9(2), 24-36.
Leitch, James, Practical Educationists and Their Systems of Teaching, James MacLehose,
1876.
McCann, Phillip, and Francis A. Young, Samuel Wilderspin and the Infant School Movement,
Croom Helm, 1982.
Barnett, W. Steven, et al. "The State of Preschool: 2003 State Preschool Yearbook." National
Institute for Early Education Research ,2004. Available online at http://nieer.org/yearbook
Kafer, Krista. "A Head Start for Poor Children?" The Heritage Foundation , May 4, 2004.
Available online at http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/bg1755.cfm
Moffatt, Gregory K. "Child's Play." The Citizen , July 2002. Available online at
http://www.mpsconsultations.com/702.htm
Gass, Susan M. & Larry Selinker. 2008. Second language acquisition: An introductory course,
3rd edn. New York: Routledge.
Krashen, Stephen D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford:
Pergamon. http://www.sdkrashen.com/Principles_and_Practice/Principles_and_
Practice.pdf.
Swain, Merrill. 1993. The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The
Canadian Modern Language Review 50(1). 158-164.
Zafar, Manmay. 2009. Monitoring the ‘monitor’: A critique of Krashen’s five hypotheses.
Dhaka University Journal of Linguistics 2(4). 139-146.
Andrade, H. & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-
assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48, 12-19.
Dale Edgar. (1954). Audio-visual methods in Teaching. (2nd ed).New York: The Dryden Press.
Dale, Edgar.(1946). Audio-visual methods in Teaching. New York: The Dryden Press.
Dale Edgar. (1969). Audio-visual methods in Teaching. (3rd ed).New York: The Dryden Press.
Dewey, John. (1998) Experience and Education: The 60th Anniversary Edition . Kappa Delta
Pi: West Lafayette IN.
Lalley, James P. & Robert H. Miller. (2007). The Learning Pyramid: Does It Point Teachers in
the Right Direction?. Education 128, No. 1: 64-79.
Bowlby, J. (1946). Maternal Care and Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child's tie to his mother. International Journal of
Psychoanalysis, 39, 1-23.
Bowlby, J. (1968). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2: Separation, Anxiety, and Anger. London:
Penguin Books.
Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3: Loss: Sadness and Depression. New York:
Basic Books.