Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Who Is South Fraser Ontrax ?

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

A case for new transit options in the south Fraser region

Presented To:
New Westminster Environmental Partners (NWEP) AGM
The Evolution of Transportation

South Fraser OnTrax

November 9, 2010

WHO IS SOUTH FRASER ONTRAX ?

“We engage – We DON’T Protest”


A Holistic Approach to Transit

  Not For Profit / Non-Partisan BC Society Founded in April 2008


  Advocate for smart growth development and transit options
  Sponsor several free public education workshops each year
  We advocate by engaging public officials in open discussions
  We listen to reason – We encourage SOLUTIONS

1
THE ISSUES WE SEE AND HEAR

  “Transit Deficit” in south Fraser (SF) region


  Current focus = get people to Vancouver ??
  TransLink numbers show need for SF community connections
  SF = roads and buses only - no LRT or Streetcars
  Aging population - transit for seniors and handicapped needed
  Disconnect between development (TOD) & transit due to focus

THE ISSUES WE SEE AND HEAR

  We are built around roads (mobility) vs. people & walkability


  We have set ourselves up for what we have today
  Local work options growing – much more needed

  Long-term sustainable living/working/transport solutions


  No progressive alternatives to goods movement implemented
  Lack “complete roads” LRT – walkers – cyclers – automobiles

2
THE SOLUTIONS WE SEE AS PRACTICAL

  Land Use Planning + Transportation Planning (in tandem)


  Light Rail Transit servicing Abbotsford – Langley - Surrey
  Open to alignment – Safety & Serves the Greatest Concern
  Frequent LRT service with connection to region (MAX Line)
  Community Shuttle Service is exceptional – connect to LRT
  Local bus or Community Shuttle 15/15/7 – integrated LRT
  Build Complete Communities (Metro Van Livable Region)
  Complete Roads and Rail as Development Tool

POPULATION From Stats Canada

2006:
2012: 1,000,000 846,166
2031: 3,000,000

1910: 18,000 1951: 77,583

3
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND

20%

80%

30% - No Car

ROAD NETWORK DEMAND

Assuming a 50% goods movement by rail


BC Port Traffic x3 by 2020

Increasing truck demand on our road network


-- MoT Gateway Program Discussion

4
ABBOTSFORD PATTERNS

Destinations

ABBOTSFORD PATTERNS

5
The Old Interurban Corridor

Will it still work for us? Should we keep options open?


We do own other Right-of-Ways.

ABBOTSFORD PATTERNS

“Horseshoe” Concept Transit & Other Corridors

6
SURREY PATTERNS

Surrey = 2,428 vs. Burnaby 2,387 people per sq km

LANGLEY CITY “MASTER PLAN”

7
LANGLEY CITY “MASTER PLAN”

Transit Hub

The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Brookswood

Fernridge


• 
Presently

14,000


• 
Future

Development
Area

(2010‐2030?):

minimum
35,000,
but

more
likely
50,000


8
The
200th
Streetcar
Line

City
of
Langley


• 
Presently

20,000


• 
PreBy
much
built‐
out,
but
pursuing

aggressive

densificaHon;


could
top
out
at

39,000


The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Willoughby


• 
Presently

18,000


• 
Current

Development
Area

(2008‐2020):


likely
70,000,

including
high
rises

along
200th


9
The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Walnut
Grove


• 
Presently

24,000


• 
Very
modest

opportuniHes
for
in‐
fill;
will
top
out
at

25,000


The
200th
Streetcar
Line

200th
Corridor
Total

(from
196
to
216)


• 
Presently

76,000

(65%
of
the
present

total
populaHon
of

Langley)


• 
Will
top
out
at

184,000
(80%
of
the

projected
total

populaHon
of
Langley)


10
The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Employment
Areas


• 
NW
Langley
Industrial

Park

• 
Walnut
Grove

Interchange

• 
200th
Office
Parks

• 
Langley
Regional
Town

Centre

• 
Brookswood

• 
Campbell
Heights

Industrial
Park


The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Township
of
Langley

High
Density
Zoning


• 
High‐rises
of
up
to

20
storeys


11
The
200th
Streetcar
Line

Other
Factors


• 
Regional
links:
The

Golden
Ears
Bridge

and

the
Interurban

• The
Langley
Events

Centre

• 
Open
space
sHll
exists

along
200th
for
TransLink

to
purchase
and
develop

for
funding


Streetcar
Benefits


We
know
from
studies
of
places
like
Portland





that
streetcars
do
two
things:


• 
They
get
people
out
of
their
cars

• 
They
aBract
quality
development



We
need
both
of
these
on
200th
Street.


12
COST TO BUILD LRT vs. SKYTRAIN
Light Rail Transit (LRT)
Fraser Valley Heritage RR (2010 Tourist) = $325,000/per km
Typical North American LRT = $35M/per km
Typical Light Rail Station = $ 5K - $ 10K

SkyTrain
Canada Line = $105M/per km
Evergreen Line $127M/per km
UBC Line = $233M/per km
Typical SkyTrain Station = $30M - 40M

12 km. UBC SkyTrain


175 km LRT

13
What’s Happening Now? SRTS

Surrey Rapid Transit Study

Examining A Range of Technologies

14
More Information

Blog: www.southfraser.net

E-Mail: info@sfot.info

15

You might also like