Clinical Practice Evaluation 2 – FOR FEEDBACK PURPOSES ONLY*

Formative Feedback Worksheet

* This form is not to be accepted by faculty for official scoring. The GCU Faculty Supervisor will
submit each official Clinical Practice Evaluation to GCU.

Clinical Practice Evaluation 2 focuses on the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) standards.
Please consider how the teacher candidate has performed in relation to the following standards.
Standard 1: Student Development
1.1 Teacher candidates create developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual students’
strengths, interests, and needs and enables each student to advance and accelerate his or her learning.
1.2 Teacher candidates collaborate with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote student
growth and development.
Evidence:
Brandy has used our curriculum to plan lessons that are differentiated in accordance to the needs of our students. She
uses various strategies that appeal to different learning styles. She has also attended all school events that our parents
were invited to and has developed rapport with them.

Standard 2: Learning Differences

2.1 Teacher candidates design, adapt, and deliver instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths and
needs and create opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways.
2.2 Teacher candidates incorporate language development tools into planning and instruction, including strategies for
making content accessible to English language students and for evaluating and supporting their development of English
proficiency.
2.3 Teacher candidates access resources, supports, specialized assistance and services to meet particular learning
differences or needs.
Evidence:
Brandy has used various learning tools and sites to help all our learners be successful in accordance to their
developmental level and learning style. She has also incorporated strategies in her ELA lessons to help ELL learners
have a better understand of our language and phonics skills. These strategies have also helped our SPED and 504
students grasp the phonics and language concepts being taught as well.

Standard 3: Learning Environments

3.1 Teacher candidates manage the learning environment to actively and equitably engage students by organizing,
allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and students’ attention.
3.2 Teacher candidates communicate verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and responsiveness
to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives students bring to the learning environment.
Evidence:
Brandy has improved her time management skills to ensure that all lesson components move smoothly throughout the
day. She is also understanding of learning differences and offers opportunities to celebrate and bring to life cultural
differences.

Standard 4: Content Knowledge

4.1 Teacher candidates stimulate student reflection on prior content knowledge, link new concepts to familiar concepts,
and make connections to students’ experiences.
4.2 Teacher candidates use supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and relevance
for all students.
4.3 Teacher candidates create opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in their
content area.
Evidence:
Brandy makes sure to incorporate academic vocabulary in both math and ELA and teaches students the meanings of the
words and allows opportunities to use this vocabulary throughout the day. Brandy also allows time for students to make
connections to their learning both to their life and other subjects.
© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
 Standard 5: Application of Content
5.1 Teacher candidates engage students in applying content knowledge to real-world problems through the lens of
interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy).
5.2 Teacher candidates facilitate students’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand their
understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems.
Evidence:
Brandy engages the student using relevant examples in her teaching to help the students make connections to what they
are learning. She also incorporates diversity in her lesson to help students broaden their horizons.

Standard 6: Assessment
6.1 Teacher candidates design assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimize
sources of bias that can distort assessment results.
6.2 Teacher candidates work independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to
understand each student’s progress and to guide planning.
6.3 Teacher candidates prepare all students for the demands of particular assessment formats and make appropriate
modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for students with disabilities and language learning needs.
Evidence:
Brandy has worked hard to make sure her assessments match our Louisiana State Standards. She has also analyzed both
the EASY CBM (Math universal screener) and DIBELS (reading universal screener) in order to see deficits in student
learning. She has also helped students who need accommodations in a small group and has provided modified tests and
assignments for them.

Standard 7: Planning for Instruction

7.1 Teacher candidates plan how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and
accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of students.
7.2 Teacher candidates develop appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provide multiple ways to
demonstrate knowledge and skill.
7.3 Teacher candidates plan for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior student
knowledge, and student interest.
Evidence:
Brandy has set goals for the students based on the universal screeners mentioned under standard 6 and has created
instruction and assessment to measure progress in meeting these goals.

Standard 8: Instructional Strategies

8.1 Teacher candidates vary their role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in
relation to the content, purpose of instruction, and student needs.
8.2 Teacher candidates engage students in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to access, interpret,
evaluate, and apply information.
8.3 Teacher candidates ask questions to stimulate discussion that serve different purposes (e.g., probing for student
understanding, helping students articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity, and helping students
to question).
Evidence: Brandy does a great job varying her type of instruction, allowing for whole group, small group, and
independent time. She also asks higher order thinking questions in her lessons to facilitate student conversation.

Standard 9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice

9.1 Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, teacher candidates use a variety of data (e.g., systematic
observation, information about students, and research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and to adapt
planning and practice.
9.2 Teacher candidates actively seek professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside the
school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem solving.
Evidence: Brandy has attended all grade level meetings with me and has sought advice from our curriculum coaches as

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

well as myself and other team teachers. She has taken every opportunity to learn.

Standard 10: Leadership and Collaboration

10.1 Teacher candidates use technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and global
learning communities that engage students, families, and colleagues.
10.2 Teacher candidates advocate to meet the needs of students, to strengthen the learning environment, and to enact
system change.
Evidence:
Brandy has done a great job leading the students during this 8 week period and has advocated for fairness for all
students.

Grand Canyon University: Impact on Student Learning

Teacher candidates demonstrate an understanding of their impact on student learning as evidenced in the Student
Teaching Evaluation of Performance (STEP) and other formative and summative assessments.
Evidence:

Brandy reflects on feedback that is given to her and applies it to her teaching.

Additional Feedback Areas Below

Overall Feedback

Strengths Opportunities for Growth Suggestions/Ideas to Implement

Creates a very positive learning Continue to work on developing Read Harry Wong's book on
environment where students feel your classroom management style, Routines and Procedures as well as
comfortable and safe. this will come with time. I know it research whole brain teaching (if
is hard trying to implement the that is something you would like to
whole brain management style incorporate into your future
Has developed great relationships which I have been using for years. classroom) Those are the two
with the students as well as their You will develop your own style as fundamental practices I have found
parents. you get more experience to be successful personally,
teaching. :) however, everyone is different and
you will discover your style! :)
Gives relevant examples to what
the students are learning while When calling on students
she's teaching. remember, phrase the question, Use popsicle sticks or a random
give think time, allow for partner name selector on ipad, computer,
talk, then restate question and then etc.
Has done well with pacing and pull a name randomly.
time management.

Continue to be aware of using

active monitoring and position in While going over student work
classroom while students are (like dictation or handout) just be
working. sure to circle room constantly.

© 2018. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.