1

As early as 1973—46 years ago—WHO knew the truth about the harmful effects of
microwave radiation. It published a document based on a symposium held in Warsaw on
15–18 October 1973 and attended by 60 researchers specializing in the biological effects of
microwaves on humans. See here for links to the 350-page document: Biologic Effects and
Health Hazards of Microwave Radiation.

Our world is about to change drastically. When you understand what’s going on and
your part in it, I hope you will take action. The facts about wireless radiation1 have been very
skillfully downplayed and covered up, causing many people to believe it’s not a problem.

Only when we know the truth can we make informed decisions and conscious choices—and
many thousands of independent scientific studies already confirm the harm caused by this
radiation.
No industry can survive unless we support it, so our choices determine the way things go.
If we don’t take responsibility for our choices, instead expecting governments to handle
things, we give them tremendous power. If we want our governments to be accountable to
us, and if we want to regain control of our own lives, we must hold ourselves accountable
for the way we are living. After all, if we continue to make choices that affect our health and
our planet, how can any external authority fix things? And if we keep supporting harmful in-
dustries, why on earth would they stop giving us the products or services we pay them for?

The truth is we are the problem,

although we are also the solution.

Design: Lewis Evans

https://lewisevans.net, https://cogenicamedia.com

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed in this document are those of the author, Olga Sheean,
based on her personal experience and extensive research.
However, the scientific information contained herein comes directly from
independent scientists, doctors and scientific studies.
This information is being updated all the time.
Please do your own due diligence so that you are aware of the facts
and can make informed choices to protect your health and our planet.

2
Do you want to know the deeper truth?

Over many generations, we have been programmed to defer to external authorities, to not
trust our own inner guidance, to believe that we are powerless in the face of life’s supposedly
random events, to rely on logic and hard work, to separate from our own spiritual autonomy,
and to remain disconnected from our higher creative faculties. Having increasingly surrendered
personal responsibility to external authorities, we have given them the power to make decisions
for us, regarding our food supply, medicine, natural resources, waste management, industry,
communications systems and technology. We blame them if things go wrong and we expect
them to fix things.
Now, as wireless technologies take over our lives and we realize just how little power or
freedom we have and just how much industry is running the show, we realize that those
external authorities are not taking care of our best interests but are instead trading our health
and safety for power and profit. If we do not reclaim our autonomy and change ourselves,
they will win.
Most people support the wireless industry. Unless we reduce the demand for harmful wireless
technologies, while increasing the demand for healthy alternatives, there will be no motivation
for the industry or governments to change direction.
With the wireless industry, we are seeing some of the same tactics used by the cigarette industry,
which spent millions of dollars creating doubt among the public and getting industry-friendly
scientists to say that smoking wasn’t harmful. Doubt is our product. Denial or non-response is
the best way to deal with this. We are too powerful to have to worry about dissenters when there
are so many others paying for our services: this is the industry/government/WHO ‘response’.
Industry only does what governments allow it to, and governments take their cues from WHO,
even though all parties know that the information is industry-biased. They also know that the
scientific evidence of harm is conclusive and irrefutable, not to mention the fact that millions
of people are being affected. If we focus exclusively on the science, however, we sustain the
debate, remaining distracted while the roll-out continues. We also distract ourselves from the
true underlying drivers …and nothing changes (or it won’t change fast enough for it to matter).
Denial, confusion and all the other tactics allow the roll-out to continue unimpeded. It’s a
very effective strategy. Once things are in place, most people will say: Now we just have to
learn to live with it. This technology is here to stay. What can we do? It’s everywhere and we
are all so dependent on it…
The same thing will happen with the satellites. Keep debating the science while things proceed
behind the scenes and, once the satellites are up there, people will focus on how to deal
with the effects. Same old symptomatic, reactive approach. Global irradiation, processed food,
drug-based medicine, corrupt politics—they are all symptoms of our dysfunction, and they
will continue to increase unless we become conscious of our pivotal role in shaping our reality
and our environment, and start to take responsibility for our choices in our everyday lives.

3
Having said YES to smart devices for the sake of convenience and an easier life, we should not be surprised
that we’re being taken over by technology, at the expense of our humanity. We must change if we want
to stick around and turn things around. But we must also challenge those who are promoting harmful
technologies, violating our human rights and deliberately hiding the truth about what is going on.

As early as 1977, a study of the effects of millimetre-wave (5G) radiation

on animals and humans confirmed significant harm
to multiple organs and body systems.2

Top of this list is the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations organization tasked with
protecting global health and advising governments on related issues.
Having worked for WHO and other United Nations organizations, I am aware of the politics involved and
the corruption that can undermine the UN’s many worthy causes. But WHO has seriously overstepped
its bounds regarding wireless radiation, promoting a cover-up that is literally costing us the earth. This
radiation comes from WiFi, cell phones, cordless phones, cell towers, smart meters and other wireless
devices, and it has been scientifically proven to harm all forms of life.

World Health Organization

(WHO)

4
Most people do not feel this radiation and they see no harm in using their wireless devices; nor do
they see the wider implications of carrying a trackable, data-generating transmitter on their person.
If you are unaware of the dangers to your health, and if the radiation continues to increase, you may
soon become sick or unable to work—and you will probably blame governments for not telling you
the truth. For economic reasons, they deny the dangers, and you may, too, if you rely heavily on your
wireless devices. But I hope you are smarter than that.
Exposure to wireless radiation caused a brain tumour that completely changed my life.3 Millions of
others are also experiencing wireless-radiation sickness or electro-sensitivity and many, like me, have
spent years and thousands of dollars trying to figure out what was making them sick, often being
misdiagnosed, ridiculed by their doctors or even treated as psychiatric cases before finally realizing
that it was wireless radiation that was making them ill.
Many more have yet to make that connection, suffering from the numerous conditions caused by
wireless radiation or aggravated by it.

They continue to suffer needlessly, drugged, dismissed and/or denounced by their own governments
…thanks to WHO.

When you understand the:

• conflict of interest
• corruption
• trillions of dollars generated by the wireless industry
• industry campaigns to create doubt among the public
• industry-funded scientists that deny the scientific facts and claim
no evidence of harm
• addictive nature of wireless gadgets
• marketing campaigns to make wireless connectivity look so enticing
and so essential to our safety and economic development
• blanket surveillance
• data-gathering
• phasing out of landlines so there are no safe alternatives to cell phones

you begin to see what a masterful stitch-up this really is.

5
Let’s look at what’s really going on at the World Health Organization
and how it affects you.

Within WHO, there is a unit called the International EMF Project. It was established in 1996 “to
investigate detrimental health effects from exposure” to the manmade electromagnetic fields (EMFs),
including radio-frequency microwave radiation, from WiFi, cell towers and other wireless devices. It
is also supposed to “facilitate the development of internationally acceptable standards limiting EMF
exposure”.4
The EMF unit is an industry pawn. WHO may claim to be facilitating the development of supposedly
safe standards for wireless radiation and assessing scientific data, but the reality is something else
altogether. Its EMF Project is deliberately hiding the truth, misinforming the public and devising utterly
meaningless safety standards based on unfounded science. It is also receiving funds from—and is
staffed by personnel who have worked for—the very industry from which it is meant to protect us.
It is also paving the way for the rollout of 5G, an extremely harmful technology that scientists say will
wreak havoc on our health and our planet, in addition to monitoring and controlling almost every
aspect of life.
In January 2017, I sent this document5 (see below) to three of the key players involved in this deadly
game of deception—the then Director-General of WHO, Dr Margaret Chan; the head of the EMF
Project, Emilie van Deventer, an electrical engineer with no medical qualifications; and Secretary-
General of the United Nations, António Guterres, also an electrical engineer.

Dr Margaret Chan Emilie van Deventer António Guterres

The document exposed WHO’s industry bias and its cover-up of the truth about wireless radiation,
challenging the addressees to be accountable. It went viral, reaching many thousands, but none of
the addressees replied.
They also failed to heed the hundreds of scientists, researchers, doctors and activists who have
documented the science and urged WHO to take the appropriate action.
Now, defying all logic, WHO is facilitating the deployment of 5G—the latest generation of wireless
telecom systems that will also be used for worldwide surveillance of our lives. This technology may be
up to 100 times faster and much stronger than 2G, 3G or 4G and will, say scientists, cause irreversible
damage to our health and our planet.

6
Let’s look more closely at how WHO supports the wireless telecom industry and is
intentionally misinforming the public:

1. WHO is actively facilitating the global deployment of 5G,6 even though this high-
frequency millimetre radiation is known to be even more harmful than the microwave
radiation from 3G and 4G and is causing a global outcry.7,8,9 To pave the way for 5G,
WHO is collaborating with ICNIRP—the International Commission on Non-Ionizing
Radiation Protection—to relax its already dangerously inadequate standards.10
The commission has no official or scientific status. It is made up of self-appointed
members and advisors who, for WHO and other government agencies, conduct biased
reviews of the scientific literature that downplay the health risks of EMF exposure,
promoting unfounded arguments to mislead the public and support the industry.

Do you think WHO should decide how much carcinogenic radiation we are exposed to, thereby
giving licence to governments and consumers to generate unlimited radiation in our shared
environment? Some governments are even making it illegal for their citizens to object on
health grounds to cell towers and 5G cells being erected right outside their homes, thanks to
WHO’s criminal negligence.

2. WHO blames those affected as being the problem, rather than the harmful radiation that
is undeniably making them ill. On its website, WHO claims that the EMF-related symptoms
experienced by millions of people worldwide “may be due to pre-existing psychiatric conditions
as well as stress reactions as a result of worrying about EMF health effects, rather than the
EMF exposure itself”.

Let’s translate this nonsense into real terms:

WHO claims that countless people have lost their minds worrying about this radiation affecting
them, even though most of them didn’t even know, at the time, that it existed.
WHO labels affected individuals as mentally unstable, causing uninformed doctors to put them
on anti-psychotic drugs that create more addiction, illness and despair.
Pollinating bees, insects, crops, wildlife, trees and babies are also affected,11,12 and former
Director-General, Dr Gro Harlem Brundtland, a highly qualified medical doctor, resigned from
WHO because the radiation from cell phones was making her ill. But, according to WHO,
it’s not the radiation that’s the issue; it’s the birds and the bees and former DGs that have
psychiatric problems.

Those responsible at WHO have lost their minds

if they think that what they are doing is acceptable,
sustainable or even remotely rational.

7
3. The head of the EMF Project, Emilie van Deventer, has worked for the mobile phone industry
and her unit gets funding from the wireless industry, violating WHO’s own rules about
conflict of interest and violating our right to health and safety. This factor alone completely
discredits WHO. Van Deventer is an electrical engineer with zero medical qualifications …but
lots of industry connections. Her disregard for our health reveals her medical ignorance, her
indifference and her industry bias. Anyone who knows how the body works and how wireless
radiation works knows that the two cannot co-exist long term without ill effects. But the World
Health Organization has sold us out to the highest bidder—the wireless industry itself—while
claiming to research the science, but delaying things for years so the roll-out could continue.

4. WHO has failed to address or document the global epidemic of wireless-radiation sickness
and electro-sensitivity. It has also ignored the appeals, evidence and petitions submitted
by hundreds of highly qualified scientists, researchers and doctors, urging WHO to take
appropriate action.13,14 Groups of specialized doctors have come together to build awareness
about this radiation and to help those who have been ridiculed and dismissed by their own
doctors and governments …all following WHO’s lead.

This is willful harm—harm masquerading as due diligence,

which is masquerading as political expediency,
which is masquerading as economic progress
…and it is beyond despicable.

8
UN conventions/international agreements violated by deployment of 5G

WHO appears to have committed almost every crime in the book, violating our human rights, the
Nuremberg Code on human experimentation, and many of the UN conventions designed to protect
humanity, while robbing us of our physical capacity to protect ourselves or our homes.
As reported by Dr Gabriel Cousens, MD, ND,15 at least 11 international agreements are being violated
by the implementation of 5G, constituting “a serious planetary violation”.

• The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states that States shall “undertake to ensure the
child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being” (art. 3), “ensure… the survival and
development of the child” (art. 6) …taking into consideration the dangers and risks of environmental pollution”
(art. 24c).

• The Nuremberg Code (1949) applies to all experiments on humans, thus including the deployment of 5G with
new, higher RF/microwave radiation exposure that has not been tested for safety. “The voluntary consent of
the human subject is absolutely essential” (art. 1). It is obvious that the majority of the humans exposed to
5G will be involuntary. “No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that
death or disabling injury will occur” (art. 5).

• The Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (1972): “The discharge of
toxic substances… in such quantities or concentrations as to exceed the capacity of the environment to render
them harmless, must be halted in order to ensure that serious or irreversible damage is not inflicted upon
ecosystems” (principle 6).

• The World Charter for Nature (1982): “Activities [that] are likely to cause irreversible damage to nature shall be
avoided… [W]here potential adverse effects are not fully understood, the activities should not proceed” (art.
11).

• The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992): “States have… the responsibility to ensure
that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of
areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction” (principle 2).

• The United Nations World Summit on Sustainable Development (2002): “There is an urgent need to… create
more effective national and regional policy responses to environmental threats to human health” (para. 54k).

• The African Convention on the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (2017): “The Parties shall…
take all appropriate measures to prevent, mitigate and eliminate to the maximum extent possible, detrimental
effects on the environment, in particular from radioactive, toxic, and other hazardous substances and wastes”
(art. 13).

• The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”
(art. 3).

• The United Nations Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030) has as
objectives and targets to “transform”, by expanding enabling environments; to “survive”, by reducing maternal
and newborn mortality; and to “thrive” by ensuring health and well-being and reducing pollution-related
deaths and illnesses.

• The Outer Space Treaty (1967) requires that the use of outer space be conducted “so as to avoid [its] harmful
contamination and also adverse changes in the environment of the Earth”(Art. IX).

• The United Nations Guidelines for The Long-Term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities (2018): “States and
international intergovernmental organizations should address… risks to people, property, public health and the
environment associated with the launch, in-orbit operation and re-entry of space objects” (guideline 2.2c).

9
 5. WHO claims to be facilitating the establishment of safety standards for radio-frequency
exposure, while delaying, denying, distorting and withholding the truth. These safety
standards are utterly meaningless and are based on criteria that have long been discounted
by independent scientists.16,17 The safety guidelines are based on the obsolete hypothesis that
heating is the only harmful effect of EMFs. As Markov and Grigoriev  have stated: “Today,
standards do not consider the real pollution of the environment with nonionizing radiation”.18
Regardless of whatever standards might be recommended, governments have no way of
monitoring, quantifying or controlling the wireless radiation in the air. At any one time—on
an airplane, in a conference room, in a cinema or in a classroom—we may be exposed to the
radiation from hundreds of wireless devices, all transmitting inhuman levels of radiation in the
sending and receiving of data. Even very low levels interfere with our bodies’ delicate electrical
systems and pose a risk.
The radiation coming at us from countless sources is now completely out of control and beyond
anyone’s control. You might as well try to define how much air you can hold in your hand.

WHO’s safety standards protect no one

and endanger everyone
by giving the illusion of safety.

6. WHO failed to invoke the precautionary principle, which it should have done long before
wireless technologies took hold. It has applied this principle very diligently …in withholding
the truth. But the principle is designed to save lives, not save face or funding.
Far less harmful frequencies could have been used for wireless telecom systems. Either WHO
knew this and failed to act on it or didn’t know it because it didn’t do the necessary research.
Either way, it is responsible.

Travelling at the speed of light, instantly penetrating

almost all matter and life on earth, this radiation
—just like WHO and the industry it supports—
will stop at nothing to deliver the wireless
connectivity that so many people crave,
oblivious to what it is costing us.

How can WHO serve anyone’s best interests if it promotes technologies that progressively undermine
our health?

10
None of this makes sense to any intelligent person.
• You don’t get the wireless telecom industry itself documenting the dangers of wireless
radiation, citing DNA damage and cancer, as Swisscom did in its 2003 international patent
application19,20,21 …if that radiation is harmless.
• You don’t get cancer clusters around cell masts, millions of people worldwide getting similar
symptoms when exposed, or teenagers getting sick from WiFi at school, with some even
committing suicide …if the radiation is not harmful.
• You don’t get some children developing autism and ADD when exposed to microwave radiation
and then recovering when they are no longer exposed …if that radiation is not affecting them.

Swiss Re, one of the world’s leading providers

of insurance and reinsurance,
rated 5G as a “high impact” risk
for the insurance industry
that may affect property and casualty claims.22,23

11
All life is affected
24,25

Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is abundant evidence of harm to plants, trees/
forests, wildlife, mammals, birds, mice, rats, ants, frogs, fruit flies, honey bees, insects and microbes.
The Earth and the ionosphere and the lower atmosphere form the global electric circuit in which we
live. It is well established that biological rhythms (such as those of humans, birds, hamsters and spiders)
are controlled by Earth’s natural electromagnetic environment, and that the well-being of all organisms
depends on the stability of this environment, including the electrical properties of the atmosphere.
In a ground-breaking paper, the late Dr Neil Cherry (an environmental scientist who specialized in the
effects of electromagnetic radiation on human health) explained the importance of the Schumann
resonances  and why ionospheric disturbances can alter blood pressure and melatonin and cause
“cancer, reproductive, cardiac and neurological disease and death”.
In essence, adding over 20,000 5G satellites will further pollute and potentially disrupt the  global
electric circuit and could alter the Schumann Resonance, around which all life on Earth has evolved.

By going global with 5G,

we are not just talking about human evolution,
but all life on planet earth.

We don’t need more proof of harm. The millions of people affected are more than enough evidence
that something is seriously wrong.
The impact of wireless radiation has been known since the 1930s. In the 1950s, it was developed as a
weapon, yet the same frequency is now being used to enable wireless telecom systems.
Our bodies, lives and planet are being taken over by this invasive technology, with 5G now being
progressively deployed around the globe. According to eminent scientists such as biochemist Dr
Martin Pall, 5G is the most harmful technology ever devised by man and will wreak havoc on our
planet. Rolling out 5G, without a single biological test of safety, “is absolutely insane,” he says.

5G will destroy our

protective mechanisms
and natural rhythms.

12
The rationale for 5G and the Internet of things
26

Information contributed by Kate Kheel (www.whatis5g.info) for EMF off!

To ensure continued innovation and future profits, the wireless telecom industry, along with
governments and others hoping to share in the bounty, decided to wirelessly connect all ‘things’ to the
Internet—and dubbed it the Internet of Things (IoT).
The technology and bandwidth we currently use for 2G, 3G and 4G are not enough to support IoT, which
will be used for applications such as driverless cars, artificial intelligence, robots, smart cities, virtual
reality, augmented reality, augmented humans, and other future tech innovations. So the telecom
industry is in a mad rush to acquire as much bandwidth and wireless real estate rights and sites as they
possibly can for 5G wireless technology.
Industry is predicting 50 billion connected devices by 2020, with the employment of escalating
transmission frequencies. Although 5G will use many of the same frequencies used in cell phones and
other wireless platforms, it will also use the higher millimetre wave frequencies (mmW), never before
used for wireless telecommunications. Although mmW frequencies are able to carry vast amounts of
data, they don’t travel well through most building materials. Millimetre and centimetre frequencies
such as 15GHz, 28GHz, 39GHz and 60GHz are expected to be put into widespread usage. These short-
range, high-speed signals would require antennae to be situated around towns and cities at intervals
of approximately 200–250 meters. In order for 5G to work, then, all of us would have to accept ‘small’
cells and their attendant infrastructure on lampposts and utility poles throughout our communities,
outside our homes and, potentially, even inside.
Not only that, but Boeing and SpaceX, among others,  have plans to launch thousands of satellites
to provide broadband Internet globally. (Astronomers say that these radio waves will create light
pollution, which will affect their ability to observe lower energy phenomena in our universe, such as
the cosmic microwave background—a form of radiation left over from the Big Bang.27)
So-called smart things are set to permeate every aspect of our lives. All things, machines and appliances
are being upgraded and reconfigured to be smart. Untold new IoT applications and platforms will
herald a new way of life for us all, ushering in a second digital revolution.
Somewhat hidden from public view, the IoT has a more sinister side. Everything we do, anywhere we
go, how we get there, what we buy or consider buying, anyone we talk to or text, and even what we
think about, would generate a valuable data point to be collected, analyzed, aggregated and served
back to us, via targeted marketing, surveillance and/or law enforcement.

13
The IoT includes the standard things most people have already heard about: wireless Internet-
connected coffee-makers, toothbrushes, refrigerators, toasters and the like. But there are many lesser-
known IoT phenomena, such as:
• ‘Smart’ diapers that alert you when your baby needs a diaper change: https://techcrunch.
com/2017/04/30/monit/.
• ‘Fitbits’ for babies to “allay parents’ fears”: https://newstarget.com/2018-01-11-parents-now-
urged-to-connect-their-babies-to-smart-phones.html.
• WiFi connected ingestible pills: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/device-harvests-
energy-stomach-sends-wifi-updates.
• Smart pacifiers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjcVx0iD3IA.
• Robots and artificial intelligence (AI) that use and generate our personal data.
• Surveillance cameras and sensors that increasingly pepper our cities, keeping tabs on us all to
‘better serve us’.
• Augmented humans, whereby technology ‘enhances’ human capabilities: http://humanxdesign.
com/.
• Micro-chipped humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchip_implant_(human).

A particularly disturbing IoT invention involves ‘drones’ made by outfitting a dragonfly with a tiny
backpack that is then connected to the insect’s brain. Humans wirelessly control the flight of the
dragonfly in much the same way that humans control conventional drones (see: https://www.youtube.
com/watch?v=TYBAal37stc).

A surgeon implants British scientist

Dr Mark Gasson in his left hand
with an RFID microchip (16 March
2009). Photo: Paul Hughes

14
As distasteful as these technologies are, they come with a slew of other problems.
1. With the roll-out of 5G and the Internet of Things, our health will inevitably suffer due to the
massive amounts of radiation being added to our already saturated environment. With 5G cells
beaming radiation into our homes and communities, and all machines, appliances, devices,
robots, sensors, driverless cars, etc communicating 24/7, health impacts will likely reach epidemic
proportions.
2. Our privacy is being violated by the non-consensual collection and use of our personal data.
3. Experts predict the IoT will result in cyber attacks far more extensive, devastating and potentially
life-threatening than anything we’ve experienced to date.
4. Wildlife, bees and other pollinators are struggling to withstand the many toxic stressors—
including radiation—that we have added to the environment; 5G and the IoT will likely make the
situation even more dire.
5. Discarded IoT ‘things’ and devices will continue to pollute the air, water and ground of remote
villages in Africa and the Far East, causing serious health effects, and sometimes death, to workers
who earn a dismal day’s pay dismantling our toxic e-waste.
6. The huge e-footprint from energy needed to produce and run all these wireless IoT products,
gadgets and platforms, will likely exceed the hoped-for and hyped-about energy-saving
technologies promoted by advocates of IoT.
7. With suicide rates, depression, anxiety, autism, ADHD and loneliness now reaching epidemic
proportions due to radiation exposure and screen-time addiction, adding robots and IoT ‘things’
to our lives may have irreversible effects on our children’s brains and humanity.
8. In the last 20 years, conflict minerals used in our technology have contributed to the death
of 5–6 million men, women and children from the Democratic Republic of Congo (see photo
below). What can we expect when all ‘things’ and appliances join the ranks of digital tech and
require yet more of these rare earth minerals?
9. And what about all the ethical questions that arise from the IoT? Consider the absurdity of a new
human rights law to “remain natural, i.e., ‘merely’ biological and organic”.28
For eons, our inherent dependence on earth’s bounty has deeply entwined us with mother Earth.
We are still reliant on the Earth for our sustenance, but many of us, hypnotized by technology, have
become putty in industry’s greedy hands. Telecom is now enticing and inviting us to sever the last roots
that tenuously connect us to our precious earth.
Playing to our weaknesses, tech companies have created a world where mainstream living means
spending much of our day tethered to a digital device, with our heads in the Cloud. Tech companies,
along with Google, Facebook, Amazon et al, promise us convenience, bounty, connection and even
love, via e-umbilical cords that connect us all with the Cloud, while severing us from the earth.

Children forced to work

in coltan mines in the
Democratic Republic of
Congo.

15
The deployment of 5G will support a much bigger agenda that has nothing to do with our safety
or convenience. Non-stop surveillance, tracking, data-gathering and the capacity to locate and even
disable citizens who may not comply with the new agenda—these are just some of the characteristics
of this invasive technology. Some scientists have referred to it as a ‘kill grid’.29
The argument is that 5G will boost the global economy like never before. However, with millions of
people already sick and unable to work, adding 5G will greatly swell those numbers and will eventually
cause the economy to crash …like never before. I have yet to see a thriving economy driven by sick
people. You need a living, functional population to create a thriving sustainable economy. So don’t be
fooled by such arguments: 5G will not boost the economy; it will ultimately decimate it.
Both 4G and 5G use the same frequencies as stealth warfare weapons developed for crowd control.
One of the latest of these is the Growler, which was developed for crowd control and is designed
to cause rapid neurological and physiological damage. I first heard about the Growler from Barrie
Trower—an atomic physicist and microwave-radiation expert who has a unique understanding of the
adverse biological effects of wireless technologies. A former Royal Navy microwave-weapons expert
trained in stealth microwave warfare and communications systems, he has witnessed those effects
firsthand and he dedicates himself to informing people about wireless technologies, especially 5G.
When you understand how seriously this radiation affects the body, there’s a danger of blaming
everything on it when there are, of course, many other possible sources of harm. But what is certain is
that numerous health conditions are caused by it and any existing conditions are made worse.

Wireless devices are handheld weapons of mass seduction

…and mass destruction.
Put down your weapons and let’s talk.

The Growler and other microwave weapons have been tested for their ability to harm humans and
have been found to be extremely effective. In a 2014 statement, the US National Safety Authority (NSA)
says this kind of weapon has the ability to “weaken, intimidate or kill an enemy over time, without
leaving evidence”.30,31 Despite having all the same attributes, however, wireless telecom systems have
been rolled out unchecked.

16
In an interview with award-winning Irish journalist Gemma O’Doherty,32 Barrie explained just how
deadly 5G is going to be. Referring to Ireland, which plans to roll out 5G in early 2019, he explained
how, within three generations, the country would no longer be able to function. As a result of the
roll-out of 5G, mixed with the existing 3G and 4G technologies, within 60 years, only 1 in 8 of Ireland’s
children will be born healthy, he says.
Barrie collaborates with some of the world’s top scientists and he has given numerous interviews
and legal testimony, free of charge. He is a scientist with tremendous heart. In my conversations
with him and in many of his presentations, he is visibly moved as he explains how this devastating
technology affects babies, schoolchildren and teenage girls who may be made infertile or may give
birth to deformed or stillborn babies because of their early exposure to WiFi in schools and elsewhere.
“Anyone who puts WiFi into a school should be locked up for the rest of their life,” he says. “They’re
not fit to walk on the surface of this planet, because they haven’t looked at the research and, whatever
incentive they have, it’s not worth the genetic problems that parents are going to face with their
children when they’re born.”
I can’t help wondering how parents will feel if their grown daughters take them to court for knowingly
irradiating them in the home, causing genetic deformities in their children, or preventing them from
conceiving at all. Parents rarely wish to harm their children, but the lure of wireless gadgets is so
strong that many of them deny the dangers, while disconnecting from their hearts and their capacity
to care. Distracted, overstimulated and addicted, they simply don’t care enough to protect themselves
or their children. That’s not just tragic; it’s deadly, because not caring means we don’t fight back.
Many governments are aware of the dangers of wireless radiation, but they quote WHO’s misinformation
to further their own economic agendas, causing untold illness, disease, pain, isolation, injury, addiction,
suicides, loss and despair. They are also invading people’s privacy and using personal data to monitor,
exploit and control the population.

Governments that knowingly harm and exploit

their own people are nothing less than
political pimps engaged in human trafficking.

Meanwhile, the technological takeover is creating a heartless, mercenary, data-driven, surveillance

society. It is, says scientist Joe Imbriano, “a silent war”—a war waged with invisible emissions that
people are so addicted to that they cannot see what is happening to them.
We have lost something very precious in this technological age—not just our health, safety, rights and
democratic freedom, but also our compassion and our connection to nature, as well as our ability to
think for ourselves, to evolve spiritually and to actively care about what is happening.

17
If 5G satellites are launched into orbit in June 2019—and over 20,000 of them are planned over
the next two years—it will be more than our bodies can handle. And you’ll never know what hit
you, because you won’t see it coming. You won’t know why you feel so ill, confused, lethargic and
many other things that you can’t even articulate. Because this radiation scrambles the brain and dulls
the senses—and I have experienced this when exposed to strong microwaves in WiFi zones. I know
of many young people on drugs for chronic anxiety and agitation due to the microwaves from their
phones, but they haven’t made the connection.

Are you ready to say goodbye?

The list of potential effects from 5G is as long as the body is complex, but what is already certain is that
this high-frequency radiation will profoundly affect our physical, emotional, neurological, mental and
spiritual well-being, while destroying our bodies’ protective mechanisms and natural rhythms, as well
as affecting crops, insects, plants, trees, our environment and our climate.

Already, over 93,000 people from 187 countries

have signed the International Appeal
to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.33

If this radiation is beamed at us from space, life on Earth may soon become unsustainable. According
to Dr Gabriel Cousens, MD, ND, 5G will cause electromagnetic chaos for all biological organisms on the
planet, as well as countless ill effects for humans. It is, he says, “an overt attack on the human body
[likely to cause] severe and irreversible effects.”
The high frequencies to be used for 5G also interfere with the oxygen molecules we breathe, explains
Joe Imbriano, who has researched the effects of these frequencies on the body. With deployment of
5G systems, our ability to absorb oxygen will be significantly impaired, resulting in slow suffocation.
Many cities’ trees are being cut down so that they do not block the millimetre waves from 5G systems.
It is hard to comprehend how any intelligent person could condone such a thing—the destruction of
trees that generate life-giving oxygen, in addition to fulfilling numerous other life-enhancing functions,
to make way for an extremely harmful technology that has been shown to inhibit our absorption of
oxygen.
5G will also inhibit critical, rational thinking, scrambling our brains and creating disorientation,
confusion and stupor …so those affected will be unable to make sense of things or take the necessary
action to protect themselves.
All this, just so you can send a text, download a movie, enjoy wireless gadgets whenever you want,
wherever you want, without suffering the intolerable inconvenience of having to use a wired device or
actually use your head or your hands to do something that a smart device could do instead. Of course,
in the process, you are being tracked and manipulated beyond your awareness. Because most people
are completely oblivious to the bigger agenda behind 5G deployment, they are willing pawns in this
rigged game.

18
If you feel you cannot live without your wireless devices, you need to ask yourself some questions:
1. What is the point of having high-speed wireless connectivity if it makes you so ill you can barely
function?
2. If you have cancer, can’t sleep or think clearly, can’t work, can’t access healthcare or even go
shopping for food, do you think that checking your smart phone for likes will be a priority?
3. How bad do things have to get before you give up your wireless lifestyle? You may not feel you
can live without your gadgets, but what if you can’t live with them?
4. Even if you are not immediately affected by the radiation, do you want to be among those
paying taxes for the rapidly increasing number of people who can no longer work or function
properly?

Why are we not asking why?

Why are we not seeing the bigger picture?

Why is there so much disease in our world?

Why are we not taking action to protect our health,

safety, privacy and natural environment?

Worldwide, this radiation is causing or exacerbating countless conditions and diseases. Record
numbers of people are having strokes and heart attacks, getting cancer, developing tumours, autism
or Alzheimer’s, are unable to sleep, focus, be present or relax, are increasingly addicted to their cell
phones, and are losing their memories, tempers, jobs, functionality, fertility, social skills, mobility,
their capacity for compassion, their connection to nature and their own humanity. We have never
been so sick …thanks to the World Health Organization.

19
Conscious evolution or tacit surrender: which will you choose?

If technology runs our lives, we no longer do.

And if the evolution of technology overrides the evolution of humanity,
we will have eliminated ourselves from the equation.

Evolution is about finding a higher way, when faced with a threat to our survival. That is what we must
now do as a species. Many might claim that wireless technology IS the higher way but, like the industry
that creates it, it has no heart, no conscience, no humanity and no regard for nature or our health. We
cannot evolve without these things or at the expense of them.
When we are disconnected from our hearts, we are disconnected from the harm we have done to
ourselves and our planet. We can only live in a technologically driven world if we are emotionally
disconnected; and only emotionally disconnected people would create this kind of world. Disconnected
from our pain and deeper feelings, we live and function dispassionately, speedily and distractedly,
without realizing that our hearts have gone offline.

If we all opened our hearts and our eyes to what we have done,
the whole world would be crying.34

If we continue to choose texting over talking, head over heart, commerce over conscience, addiction
over personal autonomy, industry over humanity, and technology over nature… well, unless you’ve
lost your mind somewhere along the way, you can probably see where those choices are taking us.
There is no negotiating with our planet. Wireless radiation is, quite simply, undermining our viability as
a species and destroying life on Earth. We need to become conscious of what we are doing and to stop
supporting the wireless industry.

No matter what we say or claim to want, nothing will change if we keep

supporting the industry that’s harming us.

20
Since 5G and the Internet of Things depend on our use of smart devices, we can very powerfully
demonstrate our dissent by giving up our smart phones, tablets etc. All wireless radiation is harmful,
but switching to a simple flip phone (without data-download capacity), exclusively for phone calls,
will send a clear message to the wireless industry that we do not agree to being irradiated, tracked,
monitored, exploited and potentially targeted via the 5G system. If enough of us did this, the whole 5G
infrastructure would collapse.
We must also hard-wire all our devices, support technologies that promote life on earth, and demand
that our governments invest in sustainable alternatives.
We must take responsibility for what is happening. We must hold ourselves accountable for our
choices and we must hold decision-makers responsible for their cover-up of the truth.
We need to choose between nature and wireless technology. We must decide which one we want,
because we can’t have both.

If we choose wireless technologies, we will ultimately have neither one because we cannot have life
without nature, and technology will never be able to replace it.
If we choose nature, we must do so before the thousands of 5G satellites are launched into orbit and
we must strongly voice our objections.35,36

21
You could wallpaper the world with the thousands of studies confirming that wireless radiation is
harmful.37 But this is not about the science, as WHO knows only too well. It’s about control and vast
sums of money, with the roll-out of 5G becoming a race between super-powers vying for global
domination, which could soon include space.
So let’s just drop this whole ‘prove-the-science’ charade and talk about what needs to be done.

A reality check————for WHO and those it has deceived

The task before you, WHO, is not to prove that wireless radiation is harmful. We already know it is and
so do you. And it’s not about reclassifying it as a Class 1 human carcinogen, although you need to do
that NOW.
You must tell governments and the public that you were wrong—not that you didn’t know that radio-
frequency radiation was harmful, because you clearly did—but that you knew the truth and purposely
misled us.
Governments quote you as saying that there is no evidence of harm and that those claiming to be
affected are mentally ill, and they use that information to further their own agendas, telling their
citizens that WHO says it’s okay, so it must be okay. So you’re probably worried about what will happen
when the truth gets out. Well, it’s out now, whether you acknowledge it or not.

This is not about your survival; it is about ours.

It is not about your jobs but our lives.
It is not about your credibility as a UN organization
but our viability as a species.
It is not about the political spin you put on things
to save face and funding,
but the truth that you need to declare right now
to protect our planet.

Whatever way you spin it, you need to remember the bottom line. There is no ‘business as usual’
when half the world is sick and our ecosystem is depleted.

There is no prosperity when humans are replaced, displaced and

progressively effaced by inanimate wireless devices.
Are you ready to say goodbye to this?

22
This is the denatured, toxic world you have helped to create …and that we all now perpetuate because
so much of our world revolves around mobile phones and we don’t see what is really going on. But it is
a world that simply cannot last, if the radiation keeps increasing and if 5G is beamed at us from space.

If you think that smart technologies will save us, you are dead wrong.

A friend of mine is a pilot—a captain for a major North American airline—who had to give up her career
because cell phone radiation on board was making her ill. She witnessed this radiation interfering with
navigation systems in the cockpit, and other pilots as well as aviation safety experts have confirmed
the dangers. But, the airlines tell us, rest assured that your safety is our top priority.
It’s a bit like WHO saying that their mandate is to protect global health.
It’s far too late to apply the precautionary principle to wireless radiation. What needs to happen now
is much more radical.

You, WHO, must urgently do the following:

1. Call for an immediate halt to the rollout of 5G. If you allow this
devastating technology to be deployed, it will be the ultimate crime
against humanity.
2. Call for a rollback of existing wireless systems and promote the
development of healthy alternatives. Inconvenient? Tough. Costly?
Your fault.
3. Call for WiFi, cordless phones, smart meters and other wireless
systems to be removed from schools, universities, libraries, hospitals,
healthcare centres, the workplace and public places, and to be replaced
with wired devices. Wireless telecom systems must also urgently be
prohibited on all commercial flights.
4. Launch a global public awareness campaign that clearly spells out the
proven dangers, the carcinogenic nature of this radiation, the long list
of possible symptoms, the multiple effects on our minds, bodies, brains,
reproductive organs, nervous systems and longevity, as well as the many
mental/behavioural/developmental disorders, social fragmentation,
addictions and cognitive dysfunction caused by excessive screentime
and non-stop wireless connectivity.
5. Initiate health programs for those who have been harmed, and
rehabilitation programs for those who are seriously addicted to
wireless devices—especially children and young people who have
become socially and mentally impaired.

23
While governments may claim that rolling back existing wireless technologies will cost the earth, it’s
the other way around. Not rolling back these technologies now will result in so much personal and
planetary devastation that we will not survive it. As more and more become ill due to the increasing
radiation, fewer and fewer will be able to function, work, pay taxes or contribute in any meaningful
way. As that trend continues, society will very quickly break down.

We stand at a crucial crossroads in our evolution:

stripped of our humanity, subsumed by wireless gadgets,
we are pliant puppets in the techno-takeover,
oblivious to our own demise.

But this is not about asking you, WHO, to kindly do your job. It is about the global cover-up that you
have intentionally orchestrated, with deadly consequences. You have purposely manipulated public
opinion and scientific findings so that the wireless industry could proceed unimpeded.
Every minute that you wait, every excuse you invent, every delaying tactic you use merely increases
the cost—to human life, to our precious environment and to the governments that will need to take
the appropriate action. Any delay will also greatly reduce the chances of recovery, while exponentially
increasing the challenges involved.
The truth is simple. The truth sets everyone free to make informed decisions and to choose what’s
best for them. It’s the lies that complicate things, cost money and keep us stuck in dysfunction.
You, WHO, need to find the guts to make a bold, clear statement about what needs to happen, how it
can be done and what is required to turn things around.
Then you need to hit the road.

We need a fresh team with the following characteristics and expertise:

• Specialized medical expertise relating to EHS and EMFs
• Wisdom, compassion and respect for our humanity
• An in-depth understanding of how life on earth is affected by EMFs
• A commitment to doing what needs to be done to roll back the current technologies and to
research healthy alternatives
• Zero allegiance to anything other than human health and our precious planetary home.
While we all need to make healthier choices in our own lives and to stop supporting the wireless
industry, you, WHO, need to urgently take action to bring things back to healthy, sustainable levels. No
more lies, no more hiding, no more delaying tactics, and no more deadly denial.

You need to tell the truth about this harmful radiation—

the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
And you need to do it now.

24
End notes

1 See here for a list of statements about wireless radiation from respected scientists around the world:
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/expressions-of-concern-from-physicians-scientists-and-health-
policy-experts/
2 A study carried out by the Soviet Union in 1977 tested the effects of millimetre wave radiation on
animals and humans exposed to it for 15 minutes/day over 60 days; both suffered severe effects
including oxidative stress, inhibited oxygen consumption of mitochondria, structural changes to
skin and internal organs, as well as damage to bone marrow and blood, metabolism and other body
systems: https://www.radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/emf-USSR-biological-effect-
microwaves-skin-organs-blood-bone-marrow-reflex-enzymes-nucleic-metabolism-1977-JPRS-CIA.pdf
3 See here for details of yet another Italian court ruling on cell phones causing acoustic neuromas—the
same kind of tumour that affected me: https://wearetheevidence.org/fifth-court-in-italy-ruled-cell-
phones-cause-cancer-and-determined-it-is-an-occupational-disease/
4 See: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/project/EMF_Project/en/
5 WHO: setting the standard for a wireless world of harm—a call for action and accountability: https://
www.emfoff.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/WHO-setting-the-standard-for-a-wireless-world-of-
harm.pdf
6 See https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/5G_What-You-Need-to-Know.pdf
7 See here for a list of governments and organizations that ban or warn against wireless technology:
https://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/governments-and-organizations-that-ban-or-warn-against-wireless-
technology/
8 See https://takebackyourpower.net/5g-the-dominoes-are-starting-to-fall/
9 See https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
10 See here for details: https://www.saferemr.com/2018/07/icnirps-exposure-guidelines-for-radio.html
11 See here regarding impact on birds: https://einarflydal.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/kordas-birds-and-
trees-of-northern-greece-2017-final.pdf
12 See here for biochemical changes in worker honey bees: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
PMC3052591
13 The International Doctors’ Appeal (Freiburger Appeal): http://freiburger-appell-2012.info/en/home.
php?lang=EN
14 International appeal by hundreds of scientists calling for protection from non-ionizing electromagnetic
field exposure: https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
15 See: https://bit.ly/2YB0K18
16 See: https://www.saferemr.com/2018/07/icnirps-exposure-guidelines-for-radio.html
17 See: https://www.who.int/peh-emf/standards/en/
18 See here for more details on the obsolete hypothesis that heating is the only harmful effect of EMFs:
http://avaate.org/IMG/pdf/Wi-fi_Technology_-_An_Uncontrolled_Global_Experiment_on_the_Health_
of_Mankind_-_Marko_Markov_Yuri_G._Grigoriev.pdf
19 See: http://bit.ly/2kcYw7E
20 See: http://bit.ly/1OQbG4V
21 See: http://bit.ly/1BCVa0W
22 See: https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-wireless-technology-is-5g-harmful-to.html
23 See: https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/sonar/sonar2019.html
24 See: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal for details

25
25 See Dr Gabriel’s Cousen’s website, which includes a link to a legal approach to stopping 5G: http://
treeoflifecenterus.com/5g-a-toxic-assault-on-the-planetary-web-of-life/?mc_cid=89974299e9&mc_
eid=e08ab2e1e6#_ednref43
26 Excerpted from EMF off! A call to consciousness in our misguidedly microwaved world (chapter 22)
(https://www.emfoff.com/), with information contributed by Kate Kheel, researcher, activist and creator
of www.whatis5g.info
27 See: https://www.insidescience.org/news/brief-5g-internet-next-big-thing-light-pollution.
28 See: https://www.futuristgerd.com/2017/03/five-new-human-rights-for-the-digital-age-excerpt-from-
gerd-leonhards-book-technology-vs-humanity/
29 See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryHw_9LVNGM
30 See: https://diplopundit.net/2019/03/18/mystery-illness-statedept-raising-doubt-about-14-china-cases-
thething/
31 See: https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1107419596452253696
32 Gemma O’Doherty interviewed Barrie Trower on 4 March 2019: https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=2aiatPWmPIk
33 As of 24 May 2019, there were 93,532 signatories. See here for latest numbers and additional
information: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
34 See: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cell-tower-shut-down-some-california-parents-link-to-several-
cases-of-childhood-cancer/
35 See: https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
36 See the ‘Vote of no confidence’ in WHO: https://olgasheean.com/who-emf/
37 See: https://emf-portal.org

Recommended resources

• To sign the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space, go here:

https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
• To sign the Vote of No Confidence in WHO’s EMF Project, go here:
https://olgasheean.com/who-emf/ (Please submit only once.)
• Microwave News (https://microwavenews.com/) is an excellent online resource, reporting on
the health and environmental impacts of electromagnetic fields and radiation. An objective
source of information, it covers the entire non-ionizing electromagnetic spectrum, with
emphasis on mobile phones and power lines, as well as radar and broadcast towers. The site
also covers medical applications of different types of fields and radiation, as well as the ability
of various species to navigate using the Earth’s magnetic field.
• Two excellent five-minute videos, featuring Denzel Washington and others, that very
simply and graphically convey how our wireless lifestyles affect us: https://www.youtube.
com/watch?v=nKd2QVrQVIM&feature=youtu.be and https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=1IW3y3x6o_g
• A good EMF overview: http://www.emraware.com/Documents/emf_guidelines.pdf
• A simple, compelling explanation of the nature of 5G and its impact on all forms of life, by
Arthur Firstenberg: http://5g-emf.com/arthur-firstenberg-5g-our-community-the-future-of-
birds-bees-humanity/?fbclid=IwAR1K_7E-4vgy_KIeRvosXpSR6sYO_Y_Jjwjn7tYXQEh_8-ahAmCw-
1v2tDQ

26
• See https://www.emf-portal.org/en for a database of over 28,000 peer-reviewed scientific
studies on the effects of EMFs. The publications have all been written by scientists (biologists,
physicists, engineers, epidemiologists, physicians etc) and published in a scientific journal with a
publisher and/or editorial board (with peer-review process editor/editorial board). An essential
feature of the scientific nature of a publication is, for example, the verifiability of the results by
a detailed description of the method and the material used. All information available in English
and German. The core of the EMF Portal is an extensive literature database with an inventory
of 28,283 publications and 6,352 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of
electromagnetic fields.
• Some additional research on EMFs: https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-
effects/
• How wireless technology can trigger a devastating illness, Epoch Times, 23 May 2019:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/tuning-in-to-microwave-sickness_2925499.html
• An episode from Burt Wolf’s Travels and Traditions series, focusing on wireless technology.
Includes interviews with some of the world’s leading experts on the health effects of wireless
technology: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf-Efnk7g4k
• This page on the Environmental Health Trust website hosts a running list of individual schools
that have removed WiFi or reduced WiFi radiation. The information is divided into country/
state government action on public schools first and then a list of private schools. Scroll down
for the list: https://ehtrust.org/schools-worldwide-removing-wifi-reducing-exposure/?fbclid=Iw
AR1gRhIgupKUmhFvjb8nyBaW6-AQumQZrqlsrL-i053Rf_l_nQWChMsBMxw
• Excellent presentation by Theordora Scarata, Executive Director of EH Trust:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHku99fR0-8&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0sAO_GlRm
qmG6PIdNLDijugAF80YEOLN9qCRiJL8-n6GZGMp36VkzpFD8
• Dr Devra Davis dispels the pro-industry propaganda relating to 5G: https://medium.com/@
devradavis/5g-the-unreported-global-threat-717c98c9c37d?fbclid=IwAR1PO-1TMxoOujAqrnz6
bVv4bguZTfAMe_2dKdbHcx4SyvpHYjCL9znnKos
• Children getting cancer from cell tower beside their elementary school:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-6886561/Cell-phone-tower-shut-elementary-
school-eight-kids-diagnosed-cancer.html
• Informative piece on the dangers of 5G to children’s health, from the Children’s Health Defense:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-dangers-of-5g-to-childrens-health/
• Enough evidence for radio frequency radiation to be declared a human carcinogen: https://
www.whsc.on.ca/What-s-new/News-Archive/Radiation-from-cell-phones-a-human-carcinogen-
new-review-finds
• Could 5G have trouble penetrating buildings? And why cities’ trees are being cut down.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/annatobin/2018/05/25/could-5g-have-trouble-penetrating-
buildings/#a3b42f19f977
• Letter of warning to Nordic Prime Ministers from Dr Lennart Hardell and Prof. Rainer Nyberg
on the health effects of 5G and the need to urgently halt the 5G roll-out: https://www.
radiationresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/5G-Nordic-Prime-Minister-warning-
Feb-18-2019.pdf

27
Let’s not say goodbye...

Take action to protect yourself

and our planet

https://emfoff.com

The solution is in your hands.

28