02 Whole
02 Whole
02 Whole
CAPABILITY STUDY
11
If you cn.n raensure that of which you
speak , and you cnn cxpr esn it by a
number , you know soraething of your
subject, but if you carmot measure
it, your know l edge is raeagre
.:md unsatisfnctor y"
Lor d Kelvin.
iii
D. T. J . Stockwell
(November, 1972)
TABLE OF COHT~TS
page
Acknow ledgernen ts
List of figures
List of tables
Section I
Introduction.
Literature r eview o 7
The economic importance of butt er composition . 12
The Contimab MC 30 continuous buttermaking machine. 15
(The influence of machine and raw material factors.)
Section II 26
Methods of analysis . 26
Section III Experimental \fork 35
(i) A study of we i ght changes during cooling of samples in 35
the gr avimetric analysis of moisture content of butter .
(ii) A study of variations in the product composition with 37
respect to the Contimab 11C 30 .
(iii) A study of product variation over a short time period. 44
(iv) A study of product variation over an extended time 48
period "
(v) An examina ti on of salt injec tion pump performance . 67
(vi) Frequency distribution analysis of product composition 68
data
(vii) Conclusions . 71
Section IV An i nvestigat i on of selected pro cess variables 72
(i) Raw material f a ctors . 72
- cream temperature
- cream fat content
- cream acidity
(ii) Continuous churn machine variables " 93
- linear extrusion speed
- salt pump injection pressure
(iii) Discussion c 127
(iv) Conclusions . 130
Section V Suggestions for further study 131
Section VI Conclusions 133
Appendix I Numerical results for weight changes during 1 34
cooling.
Appendix II Summary of analysis of variance for slice 135
samples.
Appendix III .Analysis of results using Cumulative Sum 138
·""
(Cusum) t e chniques.
Appendix IV Salt slurry inj ection pump performance. 142
Appendix V Normality calculation for frequency 145 ~
Bibliography 1 59
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. Title Fage
XVI Summary of results for va riab les other than moisture 144
and s <J.lt content
SECTION I I.NTRODUC'rION
G
l'hase
version
--+ Removal
of fat
·----~
St andardisati on ..... Chilling
Agitation
Continuous Buttermaking in New Zealand
At the present time the New Zealand dair y industry has more than
twenty continuous butter churns. Three types of machine are in use in
New Zealand,
Contimab (France)
Silkcborg (Denmark)
Westfalia (Gernany)
In each case the Fritz process is the basis for production of butter.
ext r eme cases rej e ction of the product. Modification of rej ect ed product
to enabl e acceptance will incur further cost.
important role in butter quality - but these f ac tors are not available
fo r examination as readily as the o oistur e and salt va lue s.
From the analysed Moistur e and Salt r esult s the operator behaves
as a 1
f eedback 1 link to t he machine . He a cts to control the machine
output by suitable operation of control oechanisms.
Fexa and Rosenbaum (1966) (10) and Fexa (1967) ( 11) discussed
automatic regulation of butter moisture content by use of the
Akvameter in conjunction with a Cz echoslovak continuous butterma.king
machine. A control system is proposed.
Conclusions
The monetary return on butter is rela ted to its composition and the
overrun achieved. Moi s ture, salt and curd content determine the overrun
and the return per pound of fat may be ca lculated from the basic price
paid per pound of butt er and the known compositional values.
R = p
1 - (rvr + s + c)
where R - return (c ents/lb. f a t)
p - price for butter (cents/lb.)
= 1.0
Area to right of Zin Normal Distribution, K 0.156
R = P - aK cents/
1 - (M + S + C) lb. fat
= 26 .26 2(0.156) cents/
1 - o.186 lb. fat
Fig. 1 (page 14) is a graph of the Return (cents/lb. fat) vs" Mean
Moisture Content for selected standard deviations of the moisture values.
Discussion
It is seen from this graph that an optimal return may be achieved
for each standard deviation of the moisture variable by selecting the
correct mean moisture, the greatest return being realised for the
lowest standard deviation. The practical situation does not allow such
precision , but these calculations can provide a suitable and practical
approach to improving monetary return.
34.0
L----i___.___..__-'---~--......~~---------~
33.015.0 15.5 16.0
Moisture (%)
MASSEY UNIVERSITY
THE CONTIJVIJill CONTINUOUS BUTTERMAKING MACHINE
Churning
A variable speed mono pump supplies cream of fat content 38-42%
to the single stage horizontal churning cylinder, The cream enters
tangentially to the four bladed beater rot ating in the churning cylinder.
The beater speed can be varied (by means of a variable-diameter, expand-
ing pul ley) from 1000 to nearly 2000 r.p.m o
l!"'or churning of low fat creafi or of cream having 'ha rd' fat,
increased turbulence in the churn raay be achieved by insertion of
po rfora.bod lin 2 r R in th0 r.hurni. ng cyJin c10r. Chill ed w11.tP.r m.<1.y be
circulated in a jacket surr ounding tho primary churn.
The butt e ~ granules and butt ermilk pas s from the churning section
i nto the base of the working section. The working tunnel is inclined to
allow drainage of wash water and buttermilk from the various sections.
Working Sectto11
The butter granules flo a t on a pool of buttermilk in the base of
the v:orking secticn. Twin r otating screws carry the butter granules
forward to the first operat ion which is buttermilk drainage .
The granules are carried by the s crews into the butter drying
tunnel where buttermilk drainage occurs. A variable profile pressure
plate restricts the butter outflow. Reduction of the exit profile
increases the back pressure in this section and assists in buttermilk
removal. This pressure plate is able to be used to vary the moisture
content of the product.
The butter is extruded in thin bars and passes into the washing
section where it is sprayed with chilled water and then is forced through
orifice plates after which cruciform beaters act to mix the butter. The
wash water drains through a sieve and is taken from the working section.
1 6.
The butt er passes through a va cuum chamber and then into the
final working section which again consists of orifice pla t es followed
by cruciform be at ers. The butt er i s extruded fr om the outlet head into
the packing unit.
The size of perfora tion i~ the orifice plates can affect the
amount of working thu butter r e ceives . Sna lle r dinneter perforations
uaybe used to increase the amount of working . Sinilnrly, r estriction
of the outlet he2d size i ncr eas es the a Jount of working the butter
r e ceives, as the back pressure in the working section is increased.
-
- 20 f
-1
;-Sleet
Cream Storage Silo Balance Cream Pump Contimab MC30 Continuous Salt Injection
Tank Churn Pump
18
Fig. 3. Schematic Diagram of the Contimab MC 30 r l
x
~
Prima ry Churn (Beater)
j :~
l
~
II ...-, -
_t:S>j .
~ .- ~ -
J, -
l
~
J
• •lit
I •Jlr.
In
• .t9't
- r -.l"<-
; ~ ---1.-_ '15.
-···o
. . ... _·=.--~---
Vacuum Section
Water Dosi ng Extrusion
"'- - .1._.} ~
---
1 -~~,~
~
""'-c;__ - - -
- ___ J
- - - -r-_
_J.L
Plate
Wash Water Sprays
-ur1/
r-:;--- - ---- :
fiHl I
-- ·~ --:i
•
- I
,~~ ~u
-:» ~
~ [ --
.!_ . , _
f
~ ~
~ [ _~ ·~..._ 1\ Working Section
~n
·; ;-J \ ',. . .:_ -: -;.
~
• ..i '"·· _,
'
: •• - · '\ \ - 0 ~ ~..1-..
l ,"'"\-'~
•- \. i ,-. ~,, . -
-1 -~ ~ ~ashwater
'"I)
I
' MRi "' . .
'
I1
I
/o'
r1
,.._ ~ jt', ~~
I
.-1-~
..~~--....::
-
<>-
1•
, ~
•
(
•• \ -
~JTTTITJ
.
,_.-.l l [;~
, .. I -
--i~
.
:
}
~•_L. •
'j
-s ~
~
I
~
\
'
""~~ ·-,
••
.•'-:~--~'.'.''".::.... _
~·K
......
,,
.:.-,_,
Dram
-
:
~ i ~
Yl 1 r ""-;;-"',.
Hit]'--~ - , .
~~
~
- -
~
--
· '=-;c,--1~:E - ,~ ~
~·.~~
I .
-· ~,,-
.. 1·:
-; . r= _.:._ . ..._.._-.=
.. . r~ ~ .l:
1~~- !=._;,'hr~-4r£o~fi~ ~t:- --~~~-rw-1 1°
::.~ 11- -"~''-'-"'-'.,_= -~
~Jilil1ll r.J i1
I ·
'~.!~~- ~-=--
_. · "
'f :,-,_..!.,.
•
-' _,
t· ,
1'
, .-1
I
t _j'O
J n--'!B\ _ ~..,...j
Lii~-
.
- -1 8[61
-~
o · '
\
--·
] - - - --- .
\Jr ~ -,1;1-
.
~ -~
.....
9I
1
L ~,'~ ~~ o~~c::; ~~ ~
= =
C::J
.QQ. 00
._1~
o=o=o
J:;::::JC
00
t=J::::::::>
0000
c=x=:it=1~
[]L]r:::-i
= = ~
00 00 00
o7o c:::n:::=>
c::::::>::::::::> c::::::>::-i~
1 9.
Factors Affecting Butter Composition
Cream Characteristics
Vari ations in fat content may give rise to changes in the moisture
content of butter . It has been shown that an increase in cream fat
content of 1% may give rise to a butter moisture content increase of
o.6% if no compensation is made by alt eration of other factors. (1)
Milk produced in early spring generally has soft butter fat. The
hardness of the fat increases during the spring and summer until it
reaches a maximum in December . A gradual decrease in hardness occurs
during the remainder of the season.
The spring cream having a soft butter fat is shock cooled after
pasteurisation-vacreation and is generally churned at lower temperatures
0
near 45-48 F. The summer cream having a harder butter fat requires slow
cooling after pasteurisation-vacreation and the churning temperature is
higher being in the region 53-55°F.
Fat globule siz e may also affect churning of the crear;i. Cream
having large fat globules will churn more readily than crean with small
fat globuleso The globule size may be affected by the type of milk
produced by a particular breed of cow and also by cream treatment.
The beater speed ranges from 1000 - 1800 r.p.m. on the Contimab.
Excessive speeds for churning of low test cream can result in "thrashing"
of the cream and consequent excessive fat losses in the buttermilk due to
fat globule break up. Soft spring fat may require beater speeds as low
as 1000 r.p.m. At this level, subject to cream flow, the motor may draw
a current of only 40 Amps. Harder summer fat may require a beater speed
of up to 1800 r.p.m., at which the motor may draw 72 .Amps .
The worker speed may range from 30 r.p.m. with spring cream (soft
f a t) to 60 r.p.m. with summer cream (hard fat).
effect on the moisture content but the temperature and flow of butter-
milk are generally not used to control moisture content.
The f a ctors selected for ana l ysis were chosen primarily because of
their direct bearing on the economic return received for the producto
Such factors as moisture and salt content uhich influence the overrun
achieved on the product a r e in thi s categor ya Other factors which
affect grading of the product may also be included o
Sw:nplin,g: Errors
Sampling e rrors are introduc ed into r esults when non-homogeneous
products such as butter or cream ar e sampled , Moisture droplet dispersion,
fat globule distribution may be homogeneous under ideal mixing conditions
but under pra ctical operahng conditions this may not be trueo
were expr essed to two decimal place , four significant figure, accuracy.
Duplicate analyses were made from each sample and results were finally
expr essed as the mean of the duplicate va lues .
(2) Weigh all dishes, set one a side as a standard (zero balance
before use).
(3) Weigh accurately a butter sample of 8-10 grams.
(4) Preheat sample on hotplate, complet e moisture removal by
heating over flame till curd becomes a light brown colouro
(Take care to avoid splashing of fat from dish.)
(5) Cool for standard time 2.5 hours.
(6) Reweigh (zero balance before use ) .
(7) Adjust final weights by difference in weight of standard
dish.
(8) Calcula te moisture content.
Analysis of Errors
Sources of error in the experimenta l method are considered in
the following discussiono Assignable errors will be evaluated where
possible and their nett e ffect on the r esult calculated.
Sources of e rror .
(1) Correct use of the balance was important to avoid errors. The
balance was zeroed prior to weighing and care taken to avoid draughts .
(2) Weighing of the dish, dish and sample.
(3) Unde rheating of t he curd , which can l ead to moisture r emaining in
the sample o
(4) Overheating of t he curd , which can lead t o curd decomposition .
(5) Frothing and spitting can caus e f at loss. This may be avoided by
careful control when heating the sample.
(6) Change in atmospheric conditions can lea d to variation in the
amount of adsorbed moisture on the dishes - this can cause weight change.
This source of error was minimised by use of a standard moisture dish
which was not used in the test. Weight change s in this dish occurring
during the period of analysis were determined and adjustment made to the
final weights of experimental dishes.
(7) Non-homogeneity of sample (as discussed earlier).
29.
s.oooo gm . ± o. 003%
= 0 . 1550 ± 0. 02%
The Acetone Test for Salt in Butter was the method selected for
analysis of samples. It is based on the Mohr titration . Since both
butt erfat and water are miscible \·Tith acetone it provides a medium
whereby the salt present in the butter may disperse readily. The salt
is then available for titration with silver nitrate using potassium
chromate indicator o
For the purposes of this test, the complete sample remaining after
moisture determination was analysed by this method. It was hoped that by
analysis of a larger sample of 8-10 grams, original weight, without
transfer of material ~ sampling errors could be reduced.
Analysis of Errors
The end-point in t itration of the chloride ion is a possible source
of experimental error. This is due to the cloudy nature of the stirred
solution caused by the silver chloride precipitate. However, the titration
was taken to a consistent end point colour. Because the variation in
salt content is more important than the actual value, having a consistent
end point colour is the major consideration.
Consider a titration error of± 0.1 ml. (2 drops)
Minimum titre values were approximately 7 ml.
Titration error = ± 0.1 X 1 00 %
7
= + 1.5 %of the titre value
31.
Moisture Content
Number of samples, n = 70
Mean difference 0.029 %moisture
Salt Content
Number of samples, n = 70
Mean difference = 0.046 %salt
The method used was the s tandard Babcock method for fat determin-
ation in cream. (29)
water bath.
70
60
50
40
25 35 45 55 65
EXPERIMENT I
A study of weight changes during cooling of samples in the
gravimetric analysis of moisture content of butter.
.'\. simil ar t::'.'::..al was conducted on butt er sampl es under going cooling
af t er moish:i- 2 hacl been driven off during heating . Fr om a sanpl e of 12
dishe s ·che minim:u:n 1rnight ch:mges oc curred aft er a cooling period of 2. 5
hours, a l though wei ght changes after 2 hou.r.s 1vore reduced to an accept able
l evel. Magnitude of change aft er cooling for 2.5 hours rms ~ + 0.0005 gms.
Duri ng cooling of the IJ.oisture dish and the c.ish including butter
sampl e the final wei ghts were not constant and a soal l error i s introduced
in the r esul to
EXPERIMENT II
The initial invest i gat ion aimed at determining the variations in
moisture and salt content in the product from the Contimab MC 30 when
this machine was running under r egular production conditions.
For the first experimental run slices were cut from the extruded
ribbon immedi a tely before entering the hopper of the packing unit. The
sample slices we re wrapped in a moisture proof film in order to minimise
moisture transfer between the butter surface and the atmosphere during
storage. In addition this protected the surface from water splashes and
. ~ther contamination. The slices were 2.5 - 3.5 inches thick, .this
enabled a core sample of approximately 10 grams to be removed as a single
plug using a 'trier'. Sample slices were removed at specific time ·inter-
vals: O, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 minutes.
Table III (page 38) gives the results for moisture and salt content
for the 14 'slice' samples taken at the specified times. The results
show a wide variation in the mean values for each slice, indicating a
large variation with time. The standard deviation for each slice is
relatively low in most cases, indicating a comparatively even composition
across the slice at any one time.
Table IV (page 39) gives results of moisture and salt content for
each of the nine 'like locations' in the series of slices. The mean
values for each location showed a remarkably low range. These values
are close to the grand mean of all results, indicating that no area in
the slice is being consistently starved or enriched with moisture or salt.
38°
TABLE III
RESULTS FOR INDIVIDUAL SLICES
TRIAL (28/9/71)
TABLE IV
RESULTS FOR LIKE LOCATIONS
TRIAL (28/9/71)
OVERALL RESULTS
The ' slice ' means showed considerable vari ation indicating a
compositional variation with time. The mean values for moisture and
salt content for 1 l ike locations' were close to the grand over a ll mean
values, as in the previous trial. But whereas in the previous run the
variation with time was much greater than that across the s lice as shown
by comparison of the s tandard deviations, this was not borne out in the
second run.
It appears that the second run was of mor e regular composition with
respect to time , but slightly l ess homogeneous across the slice at any
one instant .
Table VI (page 41) gives r esults of noisture and salt content for
the eleven ' slice ' samples taken at specified times.
Table VII (page 42) gives results of moisture and salt content for
'~ locations' for the slice samples taken during this trial.
41.
TABLE VI
RESULTS FOR INDIVIDUAL SLICES
TRIAL (28/1 0/71)
OVERALL RESULTq_
Analysis of Variance
An analysis of variance was conducted on the two experimental runs.
The factors under observation were :
1) Position - Variations in moisture and salt content influenced by
the location or cross sectional position at which the
sample was taken.
2) Time - Variations in moisture and salt content influenced by
the time a t which samples were taken.
Note 4
A summary of the Analysis of Variance is presented in Appendix II.
44.
EXPERIMENT III
xx 1
xx xx
2 3
4 inches xx xx xx
4 5 6
xx 7
xx
8
)()(
9
8 inches
Moisture (%)
15 67 15 63
0 1 2 3 4 ' 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
However, the variation in machine input factors will also give rise
to composit ional variation. If it is considered ideal mixing occurs and
slice composition is homogeneous, then variation in these machine inputs
will result in compositional vari at ion with r espe ct to time.
EXPERIMENT rl
Since it has been shown that product variation with time is more
significant than variation within the product 1 (or across the slice) at
any one time 1 this trial sought to investigate changes in composition
with respect to time.
A single plug sample was removed from the ribbon - and this was
considered a representative sample of the product at that specific time.
The plug wa s removed using a l arge 'trier', length of plug= 2.5 11 and
diameter = 1 .5 11 • The plug was placed in n screw top plastic cylindrical
container. By using a moisture impervious cont a iner samples were able
to be stored for some time before analysis.
The sample plug was taken from the middle of the ribbon at the
upper surface. Sixty samples were taken at one minute intervals, and a
duplica te analysis was carried out on each plug sample .
Analysis of Results
The duplicate results for moisture and salt content were averaged
and then treated in the following ways :
(1) Mean a nd standard deviation values were calculated
(2) Graphs of Moisture Content (%) and Salt Content (%) vs. Time were
constructed
(3) Cumula tive sums were determined.* The base value or reference
va lue used was the overall mean value for the trial . Graphs were
plotted for Moisture and Salt Cumulative Sums.
(4) Graphs of Moisture Content (%)vs. Salt Content·(%) were drawn in
some cases. These Scatter Diagrams are useful in detecting the
type of relationship occurring between two variables.
*Note 5
Cumulative Sum Techniques, and Correlation (including scatter
diagrams) are discussed briefly in Appendix III.
49.
Trial A (24/11/71)
Sixty samples were taken a t intervals of one minute. The samples
were rulnlysed to determine moisture and salt content.
Figs . Sa, 8b (page 51) show the Moisture and Salt Cusum Charts.
Discussion of Results
(1) The graphs of Moisture Content and Salt Content vs. Time show
strong relationship between the pattern of moisture and salt variation.
It may be seen that moisture and salt values both rise and fall in a
similar manner, and the magnitude of the change s are comparable.
(2) The cusum charts however, provide some additional information. The
salt cusum has an initial region of negative slope, indicating the salt
content was below the overall trial mean value. The salt content however,
increases slowly and in the central section of the trial is close to the
overall mean as the graph shows a steady cusum value and has zero gradient.
The final section shows a relatively large change in the mean value as the
graph tends to rise. The changes in slope at times of 12 and 36 minutes
are prominent and may be significant.
The moisture cusum however, does not show such clear trends. Changes
tend to occur more rapidly but are not sustained. Thus although the
moisture and salt values correlate well there appears to be an independent
gradual increase in the salt content over the sampling period.
At the time of this run, other machine factors had not been
50
15.5
15.o ...~~~.....~~--~~~.....~~~....~~....~~~....~~~.._~~--'--~~--~~~--~~~"'-~~--'
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (minutes)
Fig. 7b. Graph of Salt Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (24/ 11/71)
Salt (%)
2.0
1.0 ...~~......~~~.i....~~.....~~...i.~~~.i....~~.....~~....a~----
0 10 20 30
....
40
--~...i.~~~"--~~..i...~~....1
50 60
Time (minutes)
'
"' ]"c: !?: ]
0
u;
"c:
] ]
"'
E "'
E
i= i=
0 0
"' "'
0
M
t:
0 0
N N
;:, ~
~
;:,
~ ~
.c
u
E "'
.c
a u
u" E
"'~ ~
a 0
t; u"
·;:;
:;; ~
.;
...
"' ·;:;~
.ci
"' 'en"
'" ~
u: E
'"
u: ~
E
E
a ... 0 a ...0 0
u" 0
0 ...0 0 "'! " "'0
u ....
0
0
I I I I
52.
considered. Later work t ends to indicate that this trend change could
be the result of variation in the salt injection system or possibly some
trend change in &1other machine varia ble.
Salt inj ection is not the sole source of variation in the complex
mechanism of but·cer manufacture, but to gauge the effect of it, if the
1
correlation coefficient r 1
i s squared then the result indicates the
relative influence that the salt slQrry inj ec t i on is having on the
variation in moisture content of the butter.
2
For ' r ' = 0~54 r = 0. 29 or 29%
Thus i n this case 29% of the variation in moisture content is caused by
variat ions in the salt slurry inj e ction system "
behaviour patterns.
53.
TABLE VIII
Sffi.1NARY OF RESULTS FOR TH8 CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
BETHEEN BUTT~R HOISTUliJ"S CONT:;;NT AND SALT CONTENT
_::JSample (!)e
Time Period
Considered r
Si gnif-
icance
Noisture
Mean Standard Mean
Salt
Standard
(minutes) Level (%) Deviation (%) Deviation
Trial B (11/3/72)
Forty samples were taken at intervals of one minute and the samples
were analysed in the usual manner.
Figs. 10a, 10b (page 56) show the Moisture and Salt Cusum Charts.
Discussion of Results
(1) Comparison of the moisture and salt graphs for Trial B (Figs. 9a,
9b) show the variable relationship which can occur between moisture and
salt content.
It is not possible to estab lish a definite reason for this low salt
content. Non-homogeneity of the s a lt slurry could be a contributing
f a ctor. If a l esser amount of salt wa s present in the slurry then the
dosing volume would carry a smaller quantity of salt into the butter and
the relative quantity of water incorporated into the product would
increase.
Fig. 9a. Graph of Moisture Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (11 /3/72)
Moisture (%)
16.0
15.5
15.oLo------..L..------1~0------.i....-----2~0------...;..------3~0------.._..........._4~0
Time (minutes)
1.5
1.0 Lo---""-----1""'"0---""'----2~0~--""---....i30---..._--~40
Time (minutes)
56
Cusum (% moisture)
0.4
-0.4
-0.8
- · 0._____________....
10_______________
20_______________
30,_,,____......_______
40
12
Time (minutes)
Cusum (% salt)
0.8
-0.4._____....______________..______..______.._____________________~
0 10 20 30 40
Time (minutes)
57.
(2) Cusum charts for moisture and salt content reveal similar inform-
ation to that discussed on the previous page. The s ections of graph
12 minutes to 38 minutes are virtually identical in their pattern. This
again indicates strong correlation between moisture and salt content,
with minimal ext ernal disturbances upsetting this relationship.
Trial C (6/4/72)
Forty samples were t aken at one minute intervals and analysed in
the normal manner.
Figs. 11a, 11b (page 58) show the results presented in graphs of
Moisture and Salt Content vs. Time.
Figs. 13a, 13b (page 60) show the Moisture and Salt Cusum Charts.
Discussion of Results
(1) The results of this trial are of particular interest because of the
marked change in moisture values which has occurred at the time of 18
minutes. The moisture-salt correlation if calculated for the whole run
is not significant, but on separation of the two portions of the graph,
the correlation for each section is highly significant.
15.oL..-----'-------..&...------'------....,-----.1~----..i...----.....ii....-----
0 10 20 30 40
Time (minutes
1.00L.----....1~-----1~0------"'-----....l20~----~------3•0------..i...----....i40
Time (minutes)
59
Fig. 12. Graph of Moisture Content {%) vs Salt Content {%) (6/4/72 )
Moisture (%) (Scatter Diagram)
16.0
15.5
•
15.oL......L-..i..-.i........L--'--...................._ .....__.
1.0 1.5 2.0
Salt (%)
60
Cusum (% moisture)
-4.0 L..--..L..--....L---.i.---..&...--....i.---.....
0 10 20 30
- -.....---40
Time (minutes)
Cusum (% salt)
1.0
-o.2L..___..___L-____.....____-""---------------------------:40
0 10 20 30
T ime (minutes)
61.
(2) A graph of Moisture Content vs. Salt Content was drawn. Two
distinct portions exist and two separate regression lines may be drawn
through the plotted points. This distinction reflects the two moisture
levels .
(3) The cusum chart of Trial C also shows this very distinct change in
mean moisture value a t 18 minutes. In this moisture chart it is clearly
seen that a significant change in slope has occurred a t 18 minutes.
Subsequent to this change the chart tends to flatten out after 28 minutes
indicating a slight decrease in the process mean.
The salt cusum chart shows a more variable pattern, having several
short term changes in mean value.
The salt slurry used during the experi mental runs was composed of
60 part salt/40 parts water by weight. Thus asswning clos e ass ociat ion
of the salt and water in the slurry a known r a tio of salt and water is
incorporat ed into the product. A variation in salt content should also
be seen as a proportionate variation in moisture content if other factors
do not interfere .
Figs. 14a , 14b (page 63 ) show the r esults presented in gra phs of
Mo isture and Salt Content vs. Time.
Figs. 16a, 16b ( page 65) show the Moisture and Sa lt Cusum Charts.
Proportiona l varia tion of Mo isture and Salt values does occur, and
the standard deviation of these factors is a ls o similar indicat i ng
va riations of approximately equal magni tude.
Fig. 15. Graph of Moisture Content (%) vs Salt Content (%) (7/12/71)
• ••
•
15.5
•
15.0 0
1. 1.5 2.0
Salt (%)
t:
-
N
c 0
N
t:
~
i
(.J
c
E ~
a
:i
.<:
(.J
(.J
E
f
:i a
:i
:;;
·c; ~ (.J
::!:
~
.! ~ ;8
£!
·c;
.~ ,;,
u.. E
u: ~
~
E ~
a
:i
0
,..;
0 N
0
<D
0
0
E
a:i
<D
d
...0 0 m
~
(.J
I I
(.J
'j
66.
The cusurn charts for moisture and salt show marked similarity.
Trends and varia tions are in phase and in the same direction and do
indeed have comparable magnitude.
Other trials runs may not show such strong relationship and this is
likely to result from influences of other factors. With such external
influences minimised, it is probable that the type of behaviour shown in
these results would exist at all times.
EXPERIMENT V
An examination of salt injection pump performance.
The fact ors which will affect the delivery pr essure ar e det ermined
by those within the working section:
(i) volume of product in the worker - which is a product flow characteristic
(ii) action of the screws within t he worker, and the type of flow which
the butter exhibits in the r egion of the slurry ingress.
It is possible that fluctuations in f l ow will result in fluctuations in
pressure within the worker. An increased flow of cream will result in
increased product in the worker. If this produces a greater pressure
in the worker, then the slurry i njected will be of a lower volume. This
l ower volume of slurry is then distributed throughout the increased we ight
of butter and must r esult in a lower moisture and salt content . It is a
r einforced effect, a higher weight of butter r eceiving a lower dose of slurry.
68.
TABLE IX
Data for the frequency distribution of Moisture and Salt values
taken from four trial so (25/11 /71 ~ 7 /12/71 , 21 /12/71 , 7 /2/72)
194 194
35
30
25
20
15
10
a....____....._.__.._....,__..__.__.._...,.__.._...,.__.._...,.__...._...,.__..._....i........
--~~
15.15 .20 .25 .30 .35 .40 .45 .50 .55 .60 .65 .70 .75 .80 .85 .90 .95 16.016.05
Moisture Class (%)
35
30
25
20
15
10
oL-----..c::::.:::1.~--L....JL....L.-~.J....L....J....J.~;;;;;i~~....._~
1.20 .25 .30 .35 .40 .45 .50 .55 .60 .65 .70 .75 .80 .85 .90 .95, 2.0
Salt Class (%)
Conclusions
(2) The salt pump injection system has been shown to cause up to 74 %
of the variation in mo isture content. The r emainder is a result of
other factors j
Cream Characteristics
Cream Temperature
Variations in cream temperature may be initiated at a number of
points in the process. Defective or faulty operations may themselves
initiate temperature variations or sustain those variations already
present.
occurs uneven cooling is also likely to result . Not only may the final
crernn temperature be variable if uneven cooling occurs , but the nature
of the f a t may vary due to differing treatment applied to that fat . This
is also likely to contribut e t o variable churning properties,
Titratable Acidity
Variations in titratable acidity of the cream may be the result of
defective operation of the neutralising unit if automatic control is used.
Batch neutralisation can give rise to variation in a cidity of the cream ,
but in both cases adequate agitation should preclude variation.
75.
Trial D ( 7/ 2/72 )
Temperature of the Cream
Procedure
The cream temperature was measure d at the balance tank prior to
the mono-pump o A Copper-Const antan thermocouple was ins erted through
a s ection of stainless steel tubing which was placed down the side of the
balance tank into the centre of the pipe opening which led to the cream
pump.
An ice junction was used as the refe r ence tempera ture and the
output voltage was recorded on a Varian Continuous Chart Recorder, Model
G-1 5-1 •
Scale range - 1 mv
Chart speed - 1 "/2 . 5 minutes
Results
Fi g. 18 (page 76 ) shows t he graph of Scale Response of TeIJperature
vs. Time for cream flowing through the bal ance tank during the period in
which cream and butter samples were taken.
,c
~
l
e
;::
~
·c:
::>
~
~
"'
·~
~
,
~
m
~
....~
~
0
N
~
u
0
~
ii'
t;
cxi
,;,
u:
I'
c:
::>
~
~ I
0
~ ~
0
N
0
M
0
'<I'
0
"'
0
...
0 0
"'
0
~
·.:
"' "'
>
77
Fig. 19a. Graph of Moisture Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (7/2/72)
Moisture (%)
16.0
1.oL.--_.,_..;.......,ji....--.-..i..--.....1i---""---....i..---..._--~40
0 10 20 30
Time (minutes)
Figs 0 19a, 19b (page 77) show the results presented as graphs of
Moisture and Salt Content vso Time. Thes e samples were taken during the
stated period in the cream temperature time trial.
Procedure
The cream was sampled at the balance tank prior to the cream pump
(Fig. 2 (page 17)). This position was chosen because of the relative
ease in obtaining samples. Sampling at any other position could have
required modification to the pipe layout " In add ition , consideration
of the mixing occurring in the balance tank and cream pump showed that
sampling prior to the b&lance tank would not provide cream repr esent at ive
of that flowing to the continuous churn.
The crorun was remo ved at one minute int ervals from the balance
tank and put into screw top bottles. The samples wer e refrigera ted
until analysed. The Babcock cream testing procedure was used and duplicate
fat analyses were carried out on each cream sample , The sample volUI:J.e
ta.ken was 150 mls. By using a r el atively l ar ge volume it is hoped that
errors due to sampling of non-homogeneous substances are mini mised.
The mean value of the duplicate Babcock r esult s was calculated.
= 4.7 rt 3
Cream Ca pacity = 295 lb
Now cream 40 %fat
100 lb cream~ 40 lb butter fat
Added Moisture + Salt + Curd = 1s.5 % of the total butter
~ 40 lb butter fat = 81 .5 %of the total butter
Thus butter produced from
1 00 lb cream = 40 x 100 lb
81 . 5
49 lb =
Thus 1 unit of butter requires 2 units of cream by weight
Now butter flow = 9000 lb/hr
= 9000 .ll. x 1 hr
hr 60 min
= 150 lb/minute
Thus cream required to produce
this butter = 150 lb/hr butter X 2 uni ts cream
1 unit butter
= 300 lb/minute
BL
(ii) Residence time in pipe line between balance tank and churn
~ ~ f~~2 )
2 2
( rr! ) inches X (
1
= l!l.1)
(144 ft
2
= 3.7 ft/sec
Length of pipe = 33 ft
Residence time in pipe ( 33 ft) X ( 1 sec )
3.7 ft
9 seconds (ii)
Thus tota l time delay between sampling of cream and sampling of the
related butter : -
Time - Cream balance tank 1 minute
Pipe line and pri~ary churn 0.25 minutes
Working section = minute
Chute travel = minute
0 2 37 38 FAT
MOISTURE
2 3 38 39
(2) determine the average time delay occurring between the sampling of
the cream and butter. In this way the residence time in the churn
can be found from data obtained during operation of the machine.
Procedure
40 samples of cream and butter were taken at one minute intervals
and these were analysed for the relevant factors , A correlation analysis
was carried out on the butter moisture and cream fat values, a displace-
ment analysis was usedo
Figo 2():1.(page 85 ) shows the graph of Fat Content VSo Time for the
trial o
Table X (page 86 ) shows the r esults from the Corre l ation analysis 0
Discussion of Results
It was shown in the previous discussion that in general, an
increase in cream fat cont ent causes an increase in the moisture content
of butter, and thus a positive correlation coefficient is expe cted if a
relationshi p exists between these two variableso
From the tabulated results (Table X), three values are statistic-
ally significant - at 1 , 9, 16 minutes displacement o The 9 minut e
displacement value is significant to the 0 .01 level of confidence , but
the correlation coefficient is negative and this is contrary to the
expected resulto The coefficients at 1 , 16 minutes are positive, which
conforms with the theoretical result but they are less significant, a
confidence level of 0.10o However, none of these results is in the r egion
of the predicted delay time, although this may be due to incorrect
assumptions in the calcul at ion of the delay time.
Fig. 20a. Graph of Cream Fat Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (7 /2/72)
Fat (%)
42.0
36.0L.----...L------..L..------L...-----2•0------.i...------3~0------------~40
0 10 Time (minutes)
Fig. 20b. Graph of Cream Acidity (% Lactic Acid) vs Time (minutes) (6/4/72)
0.12
0.10
0.08
TABLE X
RESULTS OF THE CORRELATION COE FF IC IENT BETWEEN
VALUES OF CREAN FAT COHTENT (zfl AND BUTrER MOISTUR.E CONTENT (%)
FOR SUCCESSIVE V.ALUES OF SERIES DISPLACEMENT
TriaJ. ( 7 /2172)
0 -0.149 40
o. 261 39 0.10
2 Oo 11 9 38
3 -0. 072 37
4 -0. 042 36
5 -0.071 35
6 0 . 21 0 34
7 0 . 253 33
8 -0. 1 59 32
9 -0.484 3i o. 01
10 -0.093 30
11 0 .1 32 29
12 0.083 28
13 0.123 27
14 -0.098 26
15 -0.1 89 25
16 0.365 24
17 0.237 23
18 0.069 22
19 -0.201 21
20 0.114 20
TABLE XI
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR THE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
BETWEEN BUTTER MOISTURE CONTENT AND CREAM FAT CONTENT
I
16 0.36 0.1 0
II
I
i
!
3/3/72 I 40 ! 0 -0.36 0.05 15.50 ! 0.07 39.5 0.56
:
I 1 -0.36 0.05 I
! I
I
j
4 -0.47 0.01
I
i
I
TABLE XIII
SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR THE CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
BETWEEN BUTTER MOISTURE CONTENT AND CREAN ACIDITY
!Sample Displace- Signif- i Moisture Acidity
Date 1
; Size I ment r icance j Mean istandard Mean i Standard
(n) \ Value Level i
(%) ;Devia tionl (%) Deviation I
l
6/4/72 40 29 -0.57 0.05
'
115.40
I
I
;
0.20 0.002 0.003
I, 9 -0.70 0.02 I I
j
12 o.so o. 01
I
I I
Ii 14 I
I 0.54 0.1 0
i
t !
!
Discussion of Errors
.An analysis of errors is importo.nt in assessing the results of
this trial. Determination of f at content by the Bab cock method is
subject to errors, some of which may be quantitatively assessed .
Duplicate analyses were made for each sample. The differences between
the duplicate results provide information regarding the accuracy and
repeatability of the test. From the fat 8.Jlalyses the differences
between duplicate results were nnalysedc
Number of samples, n = 79
Mean difference , µ = o. 5 as percent age f at
Standard deviation of
differences , s = 0.56
DIFFERENCE (% FA'I
1
) FREQUENCY
BETVESN DUPLICATES
0 26
0 .1 0
0. 2 5
0. 3 4
0. 4 0
0 .5 25
o. 6 0
0.7 2
o.s 0
0. 9 0
1. 0 12
1. 5 3
2. 0 _2_
-13_
= 79
Sampl e s i ze n
Hean Difference o. 5 7~
Standard Deviation of Differ en ces = 0 . 56
TABLE XIV
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION FOR DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
DUPLICATE ANALYSES FOR CREAN ACIDITY
0 22
0.005 11
0.01
Sample size n = 40
Hean Difference = 0.003
Standard Deviation of Differences = 0.004
900
Conclusion
(1) It has not been shmvn that va ria tion in cream f at cont ent contrib-
utes to the cha r a ct eristic variat ion in moisture or salt content of
buttero .Analytical errors could cont ribute significantly to the ' a pparent'
varia tion in f a t cont ent and thus an incorrect pattern of fat values
obtained.
(2) Use of mor e a ccura t e testing me t hods could reduce analytica l error
to an a ccept able level. The r el at ionship betw een cream fat cont ent and
moisture content could then be r eass essed.
Procedure
The titratable a cidity was determined for 40 cre3.II1 samples taken
at one minute intervals , using the method discussed previously. A
correlation analysis was carries out between the two series of values -
cream acidity and butter moisture. The displacement technique was used.
Due to a significant proc ess cha nge the results are presented in
three sections in a similar manner to the moisture results for this
trial.
Discussion of Errors
The importance of analytical errors in the determination of cream
acidity is similar to that concerning cream fat content analysis.
92 0
The diff erences be t we en duplica t e r esults wer e a lso ana lysed for
t his tria l. Tab 1.e XIV ( page 89 ) present s t he frequency distribution of
differ ence s be tween duplic a t e a cidity ana lyse s .
B. Churn Variables
Sample calculation
Speed mean = 257 pulses/second
Ribbon speed 257 l ~ inches/second
2800
= 2.2 inches/second
= 11 feet/minute
Apparatus
Advance Timer-Counter Model SC3
Frequency of speed readings = 26/minute
Summation interval = 1 second
Salt Dosi~1:!8]2_Pulse PreSSl.1£..§.
A diaphragm joint was placed in the slurry injection line. Move-
ment of the diaphragm as a result of applied pressure was transmitted by
a fluid link to a Bourdon tube. A link rod was attached to the moving end
of .thE: Bourdon tube. The link was then connected to an inductive
displacement transducer and the output was derived through use of a
displa cement converter 2.mpl ifier. The output from the amplifier was
displayed on a..1 oscil loscope and a permanent record of each pulse made
by filming the stationary oscilloscope trace.
Boirrdon tube 0 - 1 20 psi
Displacement Transducer Philips PR-9314A/10 (displacement± 10mm)
Amplifier converter - Philips PR-9309 Nomimi.l Output + 1 v.
Oscilloscope - Telequipment S52
Camera -· 35nm with motor driven spools
FreQuency of pulse - 40 pulses/minute
The height of the trace was measured on the film using a Lupe Magnifier
( 5X) fitted 1-ri th a millimeter scale. 'l'he pulse heights were read
manually . Under normal conditions pressures ranged up to 60 psig.
,frocedll.J'.'_Q.
Continuou3 read ings of ribbon extrus ion speed , and slurry dosing
pulse pressu.re were taken over a period of 40 minutes. Samples of butter
were taken at 1 minute intervals over the same period. Results for each
variable uere gr nplrnd
(i) Variable values vs, time
(ii) Cusum chart
Discussion of Results
Trial C (6/4/72)
Results were obt a ined for ribbon speed and butter composition.
0 3.25 25 28 .5
18 3.5 31 increase
28 29 290 5
Moisture-Salt Correlation
Time 0-17 minutes (n = 18) 'r' 0.64 significant at 0.01 level
Time 18-39 minutes (n = 22) 'r' 0.78 significant at 0.001 level
Figs. 1 3a , 13b (page 60) shm·T the Moisture and Sa lt Cusum charts .
The Moisture and Salt charact eristics of this run have been discussed
earlier and particular reference was made to the significant change in
moisture mean. The ribbon speed cusum chart shows a similar change in
mean at a time of approxiamtely 18 minutes. This is indicated by a
marked change in slope.
"'"'
~1
~ l
e
i=
~
~~
~
:;
<
>
>
~ 0
"'
-s.
______>
~
-~
_?
~
-=-=--
~
~
\
-------- ..?
~ I
-<;.::.----
-?
__.......::-=- I
-?
l
-~
0
N I
/
'
-c ~\.._ I
..-->-
.;>
~
~
?
-
\
"!_
!!!
¥ -=::::::-~
--
1 -:.<
~
m
E
i=
~
'ii >-
~
~
8
~
~ ~~
a:!!_
"'c - -- :=
~
0
:ll
a:
0
~ ~
~
~
t
-s ~
<
'ii
2
~
~
8
~
J
~
l
"'
-.?--
8... 0
8 0 80
"'"' "' "'
N N
:
§
ij
\ ~
~
,::
f
~'
\ \
\ \
\,
\
'\
>\
./.
\
z.,.....
~ .....
'
"' \
z
\
'
:;a
'
'·,
l
l
'-
,/'
;
/ '
/
;;;
r:::
I
J
~
"
.l!
u
E
~
/
\
\
~
/
u
I
"' I
I
~ //
...,.; /~
•
...
r
J
,/
, ..,,.
r'~
I
§
E
(
,/
g ..
, /
,
u
·-~ 0
~ ...8I 8
0
~ ~I §
I
l.
MAS~!:. l.11 Y:..R!>ITY
1 oo.
From the churn operating data it is seen that at this time the
cream pump flow rate was increased by nearly &'fa and thus the volume flow
was increased proportiona tely. Calculation showed th~ t the mean ribbon
speed increased by a similar amount.
At the same time, the primary churn speed and the salt pump setting
were altered in order to maintain the butter composition. A nett incr ease
in moisture cont ent resulted and a slight nett decr ease in salt content
occurred.
It is thus seen that the step change in cream flow was reflected
accurately by the ribbon speed measurement. The increase in mean moisture
content of o.44)b would probably account for the slightly greater incr ease
in ribbon spe ed.
10L
Trial F (16/5/72)
Results were obtained for ribbon speed, slurry pump pressure and
butter compositiono
Figs. 24a, 24b (page 102) show the results pr esented as graphs of
Jl!ois ture and Salt Content vs. Time.
Figs. 25a, 25b (page 103) show the Moisture and Salt Cusum Charts.
Fig. 26 (page 104) shows the graph of Ribbon Speed vs. Time.
Fig. 27 (page 105) shows the graph of Salt Pump Pressure vs. Time.
Fig. 29 (page 107) shows the Salt Pump Pressure Cusum Chart.
102
15.5
15.ooL------..L..------1~0------.!.-----~20~-----'-----~3~0-------'------4~0
Time (minutes)
Fig. 24b. Graph of Salt Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (16/ 5/72)
Sa lt (%)
2.0
10 20 30 40
Time (minutes:
103
Cusum (% moisture)
1.0
-1.o ·L
0
------.i...----....i.------"'------"""------------..-.------------.-
10 20 30 40
Time (minutes)
Cusum (% salt)
0.8
- 0 · 4 0~----....1.------~1~0------"------2~0~----.i...----~3~0-------------4~0
Time (minutes)
0
M
<'<
t::
~
1
1
~
;::
~
8
~ S!
~
].
a:
~
!t
"'c 0
a:""""
0
-a
~
.;
N
'"
u:
'g
~
1
a:
!t
"' 0
~
0 0 0
...
0
~ 0
N
N
~
-~
.s
~
;::
"§
,~
~
~
j
~
~
Q.
E
rf
Ji
0
-a
~
:::i
u: '"
]
~
~
~
0
~ ..
0
...
0
~ 0
0
c
.8
£
a:
:ilI
(
J
,.
/
/
/
/
/
1 080
The graphs of Moisture and Salt vs o Time accurately show the effect
of machine changes o At 4 minutes a change in the worker speed initiates
an increase in moisture content, this is then re-corrected at 12 minutes
and the process returns to steady moisture level at 15 minutes o The
change in salt pump setting at 15 minutes has resulted in a near propor-
tionate change in the butter salt content.
The cusum charts for moisture and salt again show good relationship
and they reflect process changes ac curate ly.
The graph of ribbon speed data showed s ome cyclic forms, and this
is al so seen on the cusum chart. The cycle duration varies from 8 - 11
minutes and is characterised by a rapid rise of nearly 10 %in the level
of the variable followed by a slow decrease to near the starting value.
This cycle commences at approximately 4 minutes, the time at which an
alteration was made in worker speed. It is possible that the initial
increase in worker speed causes an increase in ribbon speed, but which
slowly resumes its original level which is probably dependent on the
butter flow rate. However, a decrease in worker speed at 12 minutes
does not have the converse effect and decrea se the ribbon speed as might
be expected. Later results showed this cyclic form to occur independ-
ently of operator control changes in worker speed. It is possible that
this cycle is caused by flow characteristics.
1·09.
Trial G (22/5/72)
Results were obtained for ribbon speed, slurry pump pressure and
butter composition.
0 4.2 4.1 38
2 32
No further change
Figs. 30a , 30b (page 111) show the results presented as graphs of
Moisture and Salt Content vs. Time.
Figs. 31a , 31b (page 112) show the Moisture and Salt Cusum Chartso
Fig. 32 (page 113) shows the graph of Ribbon Speed vso Time.
Fig. 33 (page 114) shows the graph of Salt Pump Pressure vso Time.
Figo 35 (page 116) shows the Salt Pump Pressure Cusum Charto
111
Fig. 30a. Graph of Moisture Content (%) vs Time (minutes) (22/5/72)
Moisture (%)
16.0
15.5
15.0 0
10 20 30 40
Time (minutes)
2.0
______....,______2_0______..._______ ____....
40
1 0
·
0
1-----~------~
10
3~0------._
Time (minutes)
112
0.4
-0.8
-1.oL.---'----L---iL....--..L..--....L---&.....--..__ __.
0 10 20 30 40
Time (minutes)
Cusum (% salt)
0.6
-o.4L---'---..J..--...1.--....J~--._--~---'----;:4o
0 10 20 30
Time (minutes)
~-------
- --_,.
::-:-__._,_
~--=-
---- --~--...
-- /
-=-- --- ~
--
......--~
.-.c. =:c.::.~ ~
---- ~
:!
0-
'} ~~
i
~
;::
\
~ /
(
·----..._> 0
< "'
~
/ \
_,,/'
{
?
)
~
l
;>
'-,,
,,
,,,.-- /
">·\ ~
\
.->
{
/)
< ,,
;:;;
t:: (
~ t'
.,
c
z
.( '
~""
i
~
;::
~
.
-~
5 '> ''· ~
~ ,.,,,.
"'
~" ' ··
c.
E
~ ....:.
,f '.I
~
0 '?
-a ,)
~ !
,.; '!
M
,,
>
,,
'"
u:
('
(
~
~
<--:
<
~ ~
/
0
0 0
~
0
~ ~ 0
"' "'
l
"'
l
~
~
~
ui - - - -g
--~ g
0
0
"/ -- I
E
~
u
117.
During the trial no operator changes were made to the churn after
2 minutes , thus variations occurring are the result of process variation
inherent in the system.
The moisture and salt cusum charts show that a process change has
occurred at 20 minutes. The moisture and salt cusum values begin to
increase. At this time a reduction in the pressure l evel has occurred
and it is probable that an increase in salt dosage volume resulted
because of this. Such an increase in the dosage volume will cause the
changes in moisture and salt content .
This change was not sustained for longer than 4 minutes but the
available data does not provide an explanation for this.
the behaviour of the ribbon during this run. The ribbon was forming
ripples down its length and these were initiated at the extrusion head.
A high production rate was the cause of this and the increased flow
resist&.""lce was giving rise to temporary build up or slowing of the flow
until the resistance was exceeded. This short time effect was not shown
in the slurry pump pressure measurement as might have been expected.
The pressure results do not show the same regions of low pressure
as in Trial F (16/5/72) which coincided with the ribbon speed cycling.
Generally the pressure level is steady and shows only minor variation.
Trial H (26/5/72)
Results were obtained for butter ribbon speed 9 slurry pump pressure
and butter composition.
0 4.2 37 44
No further change
Figs. 36a 9 36b (page 120) show the r esults presented as graphs
of Moisture and Salt Content vs. Time .
Figs. 37a 7 37b ( page 121 ) show the I.foisturo and Salt CusUir. Charts.
Fig. 38 (page 122) shows the graph of Ribbon Speed vs. Time.
Fig . 39 (page 123) shows the graph of Salt Pump Pressure vs. Time.
Fig. 41 (page 125) shows the Salt Pump Pressure Cusum Chart.
120
Moisture (%)
16·0
15.0L.--•--..,.jl---..1---....L~--.i..---:3~0--------:.40
0 10 20
Time (minutes)
1.5
Cusum (% moisture)
1.2
0.8
0.4
- o. 2 •0--------------1·0--------------2·0--------------3·0---------------40
Time (minutes)
Cusum (% salt)
0.6
0.4
- 0.4
10 20 30 40
Time (minutes)
-----------
______/
~
-- __-:s;::
::::>-
-
~o: __
~--:.;;;::------=-=-
<> J
----~
__ ?,
-=:::::....---- ----
2
g
0
N
"'
7
~
u
-·
I
E
a
8
l
"'c
~a:
0
[ii
I
J!!
u
,
c.
E
rf
126.
The cusum chart for salt content and pressure indicate the expected
relationship between these two variables. The salt cusum shows a general
decrease followed by an increase which continues after 20 minutes. The
pressure cusum shows the converse effect as expected. The changes seen
in these variables are slow and the cause may be .related to a slow change
in pump performance. Flow va riations seen in ribbon speed do not
correspond with moisture and salt cusums.
Discussion
Trial G (22/5/72)
Outside influences are minimal and varia tion occurs from within
the system. The expected pressure-salt relationship is seen to occur
and influences both salt and moisture cont ent. A positive relationship
is evident between ribbon speed and butter moisture content in latt er
stages of the trial and suggests variation in worker speed as the
causative factor . This relationship however, is not particularly strong
and has only a minor influence on moisture cont ent.
(i) Moisture and salt variation may be highly related when the effect
of other factors is minimal.
Conclusions
It has been shown that relationship does exist between the chlU'n
characteristics of ribbon speed, salt pump injection pressure and the
butt er compositional factors of moistlU'e and salt content.
Cream flow rate and primary churn beater speed are prime factors
in influencing butter composition. Accurate measurement of these
factors is needed to continue investigation of the continuous butter-
making system.
The speed of the screws in the working section has also been shown
to exert an important influence on butter composition and must be
considered in further study of this topic.
Accuracy
Required + 10 rpm ± 3 lb/mi n + 0.5 rpm
: • % Change
Detected + 0.5 % + 1 % ± 1 %
133.
SECTION VI
Conclusions
Factors ConsJd££._()_d.
( 1) P·-Posi ti on. Nine positions Here analysed in duplicate. The
level of this factor = 9" Degrees of freedorJ = 8.
(2) T-Time - the number of samples taken "
For run (a) -· 14 slice samples
(t) - 11 slice samples
The f ac tor level (a) 14
(b) - 11
Degrees of freedom(a) - 13
(b) - 1 0
(3) R-Repetitions the duplicate r esults give rise to some variation
and this factor was annlysed separ ate l y. Howeve1., the mean sum of
sqw:~res of this factor uns low in comparison with others. Indeed it
should not pro7ide a signi ficant source of variation. The higher order
factors inc orporating this source f actor , a lso had loll' mean sum of
sq_unres i n comparison with others. The zero and higher order f a ctors
which included R uere summed as the Resj_duoJ_ for the purposes of this
9l1a lysi s.
NOISTURE COlTT~Wr
v1 = 101). v2 = 126
Trial (28/9/.7£)
SALT CONTENT
2
FACTOR SSQ DF MSQ ~
PxT Interaction
v1 = 104 v2 = 126
fO. 01 = 1 .66 s 2 = 2.77
1
(60 ,120)
s2
2
Thus PxT is s ignificnnt at l evel f0.01.
Trial (28/10/71)
MOISTURE CONTENT
2
FACTOR SSQ DF MSQ ~
PxT Interaction
v1 = 80 v2 = 99
f0.01 = 1 .84 s 2 = 1. 99
(60,60) .J_
s 2
2
Thus PxT is significant at level f0.01.
137.
SALT CONTENT
FACTOR SSQ DF MSQ ~2
p 0.06496 8 0.00812
T 0.491 01 10 o. 0491 0 1.457
PxT Oe66856 80 0.00835
RESIDUAL 0. 67611 99 0.00683
TOTAL 1. 90064 197
PxT Interaction
v1 = 80 v2 = 99
ro.05 = 1.4 s 2 = 1 .457
1
(75 , 1 00)
s 2
2
Thus PxT is significant at level f0.05.
Comment
Successive values of s1 ,
S , s ,
2 3
0 0 0 S are plotted at equal time
n
intervals to construct the cusum chart .
(1) If the values of x are greater than K, (the target or r eference
value), a graph of positive slope will be drawn.
(2) Similarly , a graph of negative slope will be drmm if x is less
than K. The value or degree of the slope indicates the magnitude
of the difference between x and K.
(3) If x approaches closely to K, then a steady line of slope 0 will
be drawn.
Correlation
• ••
••
•••
••• • ••
••• •
•
••
• •••••
• ••
y
• • •
• • ••
•
• •• • •
• • • •
• • •
• • • •
• • •
•••
• • •
•• • • • • •
• • •
• • • •
•
• • •
• ••
• • •
x
(c) independence
142.
Procedure
The dosing quantity for 10 cons ecutive pulse s was determined for
a nuro.ber of cycle :. : " The fluid used uas \nter o A val ve was placed on
the deli very line and. r.·ras varied to alter the applied deli very head.
A pressure gauge Y C.s also plac ed in tho line to determine the applied
delivery heado The pressure moo.surGd. uas that pressure in ex cess of
the static head of tho po.rticular systelilo A variable diaLJ.eter pulley
was fi ttod to 0nab le nlteration of the punping r ate (pulses/second).
Mean I
Fluid So.mp l e Ql' r·l b ty I
Standard
G""'
~ ..l --
High
----- ---
20
-- (grao.s)
35 °5 0.63
---- -~--· ·
·-·
(4) High 10 Low 10 26.9 1.1
143.
t = (x1-x2)
sPJ ~1 + _L
n2
2 2
where s (pooled variances) = (n -1 )s + (n -1 )s
p 1 1 2 2
111 + n2 - 2
Sa@ple Calculation
To test if the differ ence in pressure between Trial (1) and (2)
has significantly chang~d thu dosine quentity.
v = n1 + n2 - 2
= 38
to . 01 -- 2 . 576
2 2
= 19(0. 63) + 19(1 . 3)
(20 + 20 - 2)
= 19(0.4 + 1 . 6)
38
sp =
144.
t = (x1 -x2)
sP,~
1
+
I
n2
0.316
t = 1 0.8
Class I X-µ I X
~
Normal
Area Expected Observed 2
Ne an IZ= Prob. Frequency Frequency
I ~
Number of cells = 14
Degrees of freedom 11
~ 2 o. 01 = 24.73
2
$ o. 005 26.76
2
Since the calculated ~ value is within the acceptable limits,
the frequency distribution of Moisture Values can be said to approximate
to a normal distribution.
146.
Grand Mean -- 1. 57
Standard Deviation = 0.11
Number of cells 11
Degrees of freedom = 11 -3
8
~ 2 o. 05 = 1 5 51 0
$ 2 o. 025 = 17. 54
TABLE XVI
SUflII-1.Ar1.Y OF RESULTS 1''0R VARIABLES OTHER
THAN MOISTUIIB OR SALT
405
6/4/72 Ribbon Speed ( 1- 404) 25s . 9 12.8
633
6/4/72 ' Ribbon Speed (405- 279 . 7 s .7
I 1 03'/)
.
Program 3 Ribbon speed and salt pump inj ecti on pr essur e data and
and cusum pl otted, Each dat a value pl otted is me211 of 8
consecutive r aw data values.
Dat a Iny.rut :
Ribbon Speed ·- For mat F 3 . 0
Sal t Pump Pressure - For mat F 2 . 0
For s a l t ~0ump pressure, va lue s gr eater than 1 00 were punched as
'units ' and 'tens ' digits on ly , The pr ogram r es tored the
'hundreds' digit.
149
DIMENSIONX(20 , 20),S(20t20)
XS UM=O •
XSQ=O •
SSUM=O •
SSQ=O •
XNA=O .
XNB=O •
XTOT=O •
XMEAN=O •
SMEAN=O .
SDEVX=O •
SDEVS=O •
SDEVY=O •
SDEVT=O .
YMEAN=O •
TMEAN=O•
ZMEAN=O •
UMEAN=O .
SDEVZ=O •
SDEVU = O •
READlOO , NA , NB
DOll = l t NA
DOlJ=l , NB , 2
1 READ200 , x ( I,J) . s< I ,J) . x< 1. J+l) .sc I ,J+l)
D02I=l , NA
D02J=l,NB
XSUM=XSUM+X(l,J)
XSQ=XSQ+X(l ,J )**2
SSUM=SSUM+S ( l,J)
2 SSQ=SSQ+S(l ,J) ** 2
XNA=NA
XNB =NB
150
XTOf =XNA*XN B
XMEAN=XSU M/XTOT
SMEAN=SSUM/XTOT
SOEVX=SQRTF((XTOT*XSQ - XSUM**2)/ ( XTOT*( XTOT-1.)))
SOEVS=SQRTF (C XTOT*SSQ - SSUM**2)/ ( XTO T *CX TOT-l .)))
PR I NT700
PR INT 750
PRINT300,XMEAN,SDEVXtSMEANtSDEVS
PRINT800
PR I NT 750
0041=1 , NA
YS UM=O •
YSQ=O•
TS UM=O •
TSQ=O•
003.J=ltNB
YSUM=YSUM+X(l,J)
YS Q=YSO+X (I• .J) **2
TSUM=TSUM+S(l,J)
3 TSQ=TSO+SClt..1)**2
YMEAN=YSUM/XNB
T ME AN= TSU M/XNB
SOEVY=SQRTF((XNB*YSQ-YSUM**2)/(XNB*(XNB-1 .) ))
SOEVT=SQR TF( ( XNB*TSQ-TSUM**2)/(XNB*CXNB-l.) ))
PRINT300,YMEANtSDEVY,TMEANtSOEVT
4 CONTINUE
PRINT900
900 FORMAT ( 1Hl,40X,26HRESULTS FOR LIKE LOCATIONS//)
PRINT 750
006.J=ltNB t 2
ZSUM=O .
ZS Q=O •
USUM=O.
USQ=O •
151
D051=1,NA
ZSUM=ZSUM+X(J,J)+X(I,J+l)
ZS Q=ZSQ+X (I, J) ** 2+ X (I, J+ 1) **2
USUM=USUM+S(I,J)+S(I,J+l)
5 USQ=USQ+S(I,J)**2+S(l,J+l)**2
XNAB=XNA*2•
ZME AN=ZSU M/XNAB
UMEAN=USUM/XNAB
SDEVZ=SQRTF((XNAB*ZSQ-ZSUM**2)/{XNAB*( XNAB-le)))
SDEVU=SQRTF((XNAB*USQ-USUM**2)/(XNAB*(XNAB-l.)))
PRINT300,ZMEAN,SDEVZ,UMEAN,SDEVU
6 CONTINUE
1 00 FORMAT (212)
200 FORMAT(lOX,F7.0,F5.0,F7eO,F5.0)
300 FORM~(lHo,2ox,F10.5,13x,F10.5,14x,F10.5,13x,F10.5)
700 FORMAT(1Hlt40Xtl5HOVERALL RESULTS//)
750 FORMAT(lH d5Xd4HMOISTURE MEAN ,8Xt17HMOISTURE STD DEV ,12X,
llOHSALT MEAN ,ax,13HSALT STD DEV///)
800 FORMAT(1Hl,40X,29HRESULTS FOR INDIVIDUAL SLICES//)
END
152
SMEAN=SSUM/XN
XME AN=XSU M/XN
SDEVX=SQRTF((XN*XSQ-XSUM**2)/(XN*(XN-le)))
SDEVF=SQRTF((XN*FSQ-FSUM**2)/(XN*CXN-le )))
SDEVS=SQRTF((XN*SSQ-SSUM**2)/(XN*(XN-le)))
R=(XN*XPROD-(XSUM*SSUM))/SQRTF((XN*XSQ-XSUM**2)*(XN*SSQ-SSUM**2))
PRINT 300
300 FORMAT ( lH t40Xt24HCORRELATION COEFFICIENTS///)
PRINT400tR
400 FORMAT(lH t20Xt13HM:JISTURE-SALTtF8e5////)
PRINT130
130 FORMAT(lH t5Xt13HMOISTURE MEAN,5Xt16HMOISTURE STD DEV,8Xt9HSALT ME2
2ANt5Xt12HSALT STD DEV,8Xt8HFAT MEANt5XtllHFAT STD DEV///)
PRINT150tXMEANtSDEVXtSMEANtSDEVS,FMEANtSDEVF
150 FORMAT(lH ,ax,F10.s,ax,F10.s,11x,F10.s,6XtFl0.5,8X,Fl0.3,5X,Fl0.3/3
3 //)
PRINT500
500 FORMAT(lH t25Xt19HDISPLACEMENT VALUES,24X,14HCORRELN COEFFT//)
5 FSUM=O.
FSQ=O•
XSUM=O •
XSQ=O•
FPROD=O•
D06I=ltN
XS UM=X (I ) +XSUM
XSQ=X(l)**2+XSQ
FS UM=F ( I ) +FSUM
FSQ=F (I ) ** 2+F SQ
6 FPRDD=F (I )*X (I )+FPRJD
XN=N
R = ( XN*FPROO-( X SUM*F SUM) ) /S QRTF ( ( XN* XSQ-XSUM* *2) * ( XN*F5 Q-FSUM **2) )
M=Nf-N
l{)
•
Cl)
u_
•
x
(jl
f't')
•
.;:t
......
• 0
x .....
fl') .
~
..
er f't') 0
• ....... .....
0
0
...
• I I'-
0 ..
+
z ..... ....f-
x
f- ..... x w
'z°
f- <(
~
fl')
I
::E:
.....
I
II
..... II l{)
0 _J
...... er z Cl) f- _J a
er u_ II 0 0 z
Cl. IL
0
.... z a x l?
<(
u w
0 I'- Cl) 0
0 .....
'°
155
PROGRAM FOR RIBBON SPEED AND INJECTION PRESSURE DATA AND CUSUM
PLOf, USING MEAN OF 8 CONSECUTIVE VALUES
DIMENSIONSPC26),PR(40),SMN(220),PMN(220),CUSUM(220),CUSUMP(220)
50 READ40,MS,MP,XM
40 FORMAT(212,F4.0)
PR I NT 4 1 , MS ,M P , XM
41 FORMAT(lH 3HMS=,J4,lOX,3HMP=,I4,lOX,3HXM=,F8.0,//)
L=O
D08K= l t MS
READlOO,(SP(l),l=l,26)
100 FORMAT(26F3.0)
D08I=lt5
J= ( ( I -1 ) *5 ) + 1
S=CSP(J)+SP(J+l)+SP(J+2)+SP(J+3)+SP(J+4))/5e
L=L+ 1
SMN(L)=S
8 CONTINUE
PR I NT 200
200 FORMAT(lH ,2ox,22HMEAN OF 5 VALUES SPEED//)
PR I NT 2 1 0 , ( S"1 N ( I ) , I =1 , L )
210 FORMAT(15F8.0)
M=O
D028K=l ,MP
READllO,(PR(I),1=1,40)
110 FORMAT(40F2.0)
D0261=1,40
IF(PR(I)-13.)24,24,26
24 PR(l)=PR(I)+lOOe
26 CONT I NUE
00281= 1,5
J=(( 1-1 )*8)+1
P=(PR(J)+PR(J+l)+PR(J+2)+PR(J+3)+PR(J+4)+PR(J+5)+PR(J+6)+PR(J+7))/
18.
156
M=M+l
PMN(M)=P
28 CONTINUE
PRINT220
220 FORMAT(1Hlt20Xt25HMEAN OF 8 V.<\LUES PRESSURE//)
PRINT230, (PMN ( I ) , I= l tM)
230 FORMAT C 15F8.0)
SECTION FOR CUSUM CALCULATION
PRSUM=O •
SPSUM=O.
COSUM=O •
DI FF=O •
XLf=L
PRINT400
400 FORMATC1Hlt30Xt31HSPEED CUSUM VALUES (MEAN OF 8 ) / / )
410 FORMATC1Hlt30Xt31HPRESS CUSUM VALUES (MEAN OF 8 ) / / )
00411I=1, L
SPSUM=SPSUM+SMN(I)
411 PRSUM=PRSUM+PMN ( I )
SP MUN= SPSU M/XL T
PRMUN=PR SUM /XLT
004121=1 t L
DIFF=SMN(l)-SPMUN
COSUM=C OSU M+DI FF
412 CUSUM(l)=COSUM
PRINT500, (CUSUM( I) , I = l , L )
500 FORMAT(lH t15F8.0)
PR I NT4 10
COSUM=O •
004131=1,L
DIF~=PMN(l)-PRMUN
XMIN=l•
XMAX=XLT
XL=20 •
XO= 10 •
YL=lO.
YD= 10 •
YM AX=4 00 •
YM IN= 200 •
CALLPLOT( l.XMIN.XMAX.xL.xD.YMINtYMAX.YL,YD)
D0414I=ltL
X=I
CALLPLOT(O,X,SMN(I))
414 CONTINUE
CALLPLOT(7)
XMIN=l•
XMAX=XL T
XL =20 •
XD=lO.
YL= 10 •
YD= 10 •
YMAX=l20.
YMIN=O•
CAL LPL OT ( 1 t X MIN, XM AX tX Lt XO, YMt N t YMA Xt Y L, YD)
D0415I=l•L
X=I
CALLPLOT{O,X,PMN{I))
415 CONTINUE
CALLPLOT{7)
XMIN=l•
XMAX=XLT
XL=20 •
XD= 1 0 •
158
YL= 10 •
YD=2 0 •
ACCEPT , YMAX, YM IN
CALLPLOTCltXMINtXMAX,XLtXDtYMIN,YMAX,YL,YD)
D0416I=ltL
X=I
CALLPLOT(OtXtCUSUM(I))
4 1 6 C 0 NT I NU E
CALLPLOT(7)
XMIN=l•
XMAX=XL T
XL=20 •
XD=lO.
YL=lO.
YD=20.
ACCEPT,YMAX,YMIN
CALLPLOT(l,XMIN,XMAX,XL,XDtYMIN,YMAX,YL,YD)
D04l7I=1, L
X=I
CALLPLOT(O,x,cusuMP(I))
417 CONTINUE
CALLPLOT(7)
GOT050
418 CALL EXIT
END
- - - - - - - - - -- - -
159.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
SECTION A
SECTION B
(Include Refs. 1, 2, 3)