Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
125 views41 pages

Ventilator Waveforms DavidTuxen2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 41

DIAGNOSING VENTILATOR

WAVEFORMS

Prof David V. Tuxen


Dept of Intensive Care
Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Australia

The Alfred Intensive Care Unit, Melbourne, Australia


1. Early-insp P (VCV, decel flow)
Hi flow, small vol - P mainly flow & resistance

2. End-insp P
VolHi Control: 12 x
flow, max vol - P mainly Vt &450, Vi 50
compliance

3. Exp flow curve


Shallow curve – complete 1-2 sec

4. Pplat

4. auto-PEEP

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Detection of Airflow Obstruction

1. Persisting end-expiratory flow

2. Auto PEEP

3. Expiratory flow curve shape

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Vol Control: 14 x 300, Vi 60

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
P support 12

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Auto-PEEP UNDERESTIMATES DHI
• Airway closure during deflation 9
Auto-PEEP 9
• Most severely obstructed 1st
12
• Multiple high P,
non-communicating units
16
• Auto-PEEP measures only Mean Palv 15
communicating units
22

Leatherman & Ravenscraft Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 541-6


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Detection of Airflow Obstruction

1. End-expiratory flow – easily missed


lowest flows = worst AO
rate dependent
2. Auto PEEP – must think to do it
often can’t be done
underestimates problem

3. Exp curve shape – easily missed


no quantification

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Vol Control: 12 x 450, Vi 50

90%
N >80%

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


55%
N >80%

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


PEV1 / Vt
SD Error bars

>97% normal
PEV1/Vt >80%

Good discrimination for mod-severe UAO & LAO


The Alfred (+ mild
Hospital, UAO)Australia
Melbourne,
72 yo M Known mild COPD

1 wk increasing SOB→fatigue , PCO2, drowsy

CXR unremarkable. Exacerbation COPD

Intubated, ventilated

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Discrimination of Exp Flow Shapes

NORMAL LOWER AO UPPER AO


Triangular Deep CCC Horizontal
(shallow curve) (concave curve) (or linear slope)
>80% 1st sec <80% 1st sec <80% 1st sec
N 90%
Resistance ↑ Resistance
as Lung Vol↓ constant

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Routine ward round – sedated head injury 6 days

No ventilation problems

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Obstructed Waveform

Problem Solve System


1.Check circuit – suction cath, tube kink/bite
tube malposition/rotation

2.Check CXR – tube malposition/kink

3.Bronch – check it out (trach - remove inner cannula)

4.Change ETT

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Vol Control: 12 x 550, Vi 60

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Insp Flow (Vi) Starvation
• Usually VCV decel flow – P dip mid-breath
– P rise at end-breath when effort finished

Mx
• Increase Vi – often decel shape doesn’t suit the patient - ✖︎

• Square wave flow – often this flow doesn’t suit patient - ✖︎

• P control, P supt, VC+ (or ≡) – usually works well, ± Vt↑↑ (?P-SILI)

• Increase support (reduce drive) - RR↑

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Vol Control: 12 x 550, Vi 85

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Vt 400 Vt Starvation

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Vol Starvation
• VCV only – P dip to end-breath ± spont breath immed after
(Flow starvation also always present)

Mx
• Increase Vt (match demand) – but often still flow starvation

• Swap to CPAP/PSV (or PCV) mode

• Increase Rate (PCO2) – reduce respiratory drive

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


P Control

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Vol Control

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


P Control

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
REVERSE TRIGGERING
• Ventilator breath triggers patient inspiration  “double breath”
“Head reflex” lung stretch trigger (opposite to Herring-Breuer R)

• Usually an obtunded patient

• Patients rate tracks the ventilator


Vent rate↑→ Pt rate↑ Vent rate↓→ Pt rate↓
CPAP / Psupt – often apnea/hypopnea

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


Mx REVERSE TRIGGERING

• Usually poor response to – hyperventilation & sedation


– sedation↑ (already obtunded)

• Best Mx is sedation↓ – wake and CPAP or Psupt

• In meantime – Reduce Vt & wait

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia


CONCLUSION
1. Waveforms can detect problems not otherwise obvious

2. Systematically survey insp & exp P & flow curves

3. Detect & discriminate large & small AO

4. M waves should be identified and fixed


5. Systematic problem solving approach

The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

You might also like