Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History Debate
History Debate
MISA SA
PILIPINAS
(DEBATE)
MEMBERS:
LIMASAWA’s CLAIM
Pablo Pastells wrote: “Magellan did not go to Butuan.
Rather, from the island of Limasawa, he proceeded directly
to Cebu.”
Among the Philippine scholars of the early 20th century
who rejected the Butuan tradition in favor of Limasawa was
Jayme de Veyra.
Blame was at first laid on the Americans Emma Blair and
James Alexander Robertson, who authored the 55-volume
collection of documents on the Philippines Island that was
published in Cleveland from 1903 to 1909.
The cause of the shift in opinion was the publication in
1894 of Pigafetta’s account, as contained in the Ambrosian
Codex.
Pigafetta was the chronicler of the Magellan expedition in
1521 that brought Europeans for the first time to the
archipelago.
Pigafetta’s narrative was reproduced with English
translation, notes, bibliography and index in Blair and
Robertson’s The Philippine Islands, volumes 33 and 34.
Following the publication of the Pigafetta text in 1894,
two Philippine scholars called attention to the fact that
the Butuan tradition had been a mistake. One of the
scholars was Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera. The other was
the Spanish Jesuit missionary, Pablo Pastells, S.J.
Fr. Pastells prepared a new edition of Fr Colin’s Labor
Evangelica, which was published in 1902, and which
contained a correction about the first mass.
Pastells‘ shift in opinion from Butuan to Limasawa was due
to a rediscovery and a more attentive study of the primary
sources on the subject:
Pigafetta’s account and Francisco Albo’s log of the
expedition. Pigafetta and Albo were eyewitnesses.
Historian Pablo Pastells stating by the footnote to
Francisco Colin’s Labor Evangelica that Magellan did not
go to Butuan but form Limasawa to Cebu.
Francisco Albo ( pilot of Magellan’s flagship does not
mention the first mass but he writes that they erected a
cross on a mountain which overlooked three islands the west
and the southwest. *James Robertson agreed with Pastells
in a footnote that “Mazua” was actually Limasawa in the
authentic account of Pigafetta, the port was not in Butuan
but an island named Mazua ( Masawa)
Father Bernard studied all the Pigafetta’s maps, which
place in Mazau off the southern tip of the larger island
of Leyte., a check with the modern maps will show that this
jibes with Limasawa and not Masao or Butuan
BUTUAN’s CLAIM
Fr. Bernad’s presentation of the historical records and
his assessment of the arguments speak eloquently for
itself. He backs up each finding with generous citations
in his notes and a bibliography.
Fr. Bernad‘s report that the Butuan claim has been the more
ascendant and persistent, reigning over public opinion for
some three centuries, the 17th, the 18th and the 19th
century.
On the strength of this tradition, a monument was erected
in 1872 at the mouth of the Agusan River. The monument was
erected apparently at the instigation of the parish priest
of Butuan, who at the time was a Spanish friar of the Order
of Augustinian Recollects. The date given for the first
Mass was April 8, 1521, an obvious error that may have been
due to an anachronistic attempt to translate the original
date in the Gregorian calendar.
The monument is a testimonial to the Butuan tradition that
remained vigorous until the end of the 19th century, which
held that Magellan and his expedition landed in Butuan,
and celebrated there the first mass on Philippine soil.
Because the Butuan tradition had already been established
by the middle of the 17h century, it was accepted without
question by two Jesuit historians who got misled by their
facts.
On historian was Fr. Francisco Colin, S.J. (1592-1660),
whose Labor Evangelica was first published in Madrid in
1663, three years after his death. He provided in the book
an account of Magellan’s arrival and the first mass.
The other Jesuit writer of the mid-17th century was
Francisco Combes S.J. (1620-1665), who had lived and worked
as a missionary in the Philippines. His Historia de
Mindanao y Jolo was printed in Madrid in 1667, four years
after Colin’s work was published.
Colin and Combes gave different accounts of the route taken
by Magellan. But they asserted that Magellan landed in
Butuan and there planted the cross in a solemn ceremony.
Both Colin and Combes pictured Magellan as visiting both
Butuan and Limasawa.
Both Colin and Combes agree that it was from Limasawa and
with the help of Limasawa’s chieftain that the Magellan
expedition went to Cebu. Magellan arrived in Cebu on April
7, 1521, one week after the first mass.
In the 19th century, the Butuan tradition was taken for
granted and it is mentioned by writer after writer, each
copying from the previous one, and being in turn copied by
those who came after.
The accumulated errors of three centuries are found in the
work of Dominican friar, Valentin Morales y Marin, whose
two-volume treatise on the friars was published in Santo
Tomas in Manila in 1901.
As late as the 1920s, the Philippine history textbook used
at the Ateneo de Manila used the Butuan tradition.