Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

The Interplay of Intellectual Property Rights and Human Rights

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The interplay of Intellectual Property Rights and Human

Rights:

Intellectual property regimes request to balance the ethical and economic rights of creators
and inventors with the broader interests and desires of the society. A major justification for
patents and copyrights is that incentives and rewards to inventors result in advantages for the
society. A person's rights approach to holding takes what's usually an implicit balance
between the rights of inventors and creators and therefore the interests of the broader society
within holding paradigms and makes it way more specific and exacting. The International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) is that the major international
human rights instrument addressing these problems. Article 15 specifies that States Parties,
that's the countries that have legal or acceded to the current instrument, "recognize the proper
of everyone" each "to fancy the advantages of scientific progress and its applications" and "to
get pleasure from the protection of the ethical and material interests resulting from any
scientific, literary or artistic creation of that he's the author.1"The right of everybody to share
within the advantages of science has been enshrined in human rights instruments since the
last century, originally in Article twenty seven of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights (UDHR) and afterwards in Article fifteen of the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). the proper was usually perceived as "obscure"
associate degreed its interpretation wide neglected till the growth of the international
belongings (IP) regime beneath the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of belongings
(TRIPS) prompted an upsurge of legal scholarship and reports from international
organizations seeking to deal with the "human rights contradiction." The contradiction is
claimed to arise from the juxtaposition in human rights instruments of individual rights over
intellectual creations against the rights of everybody to "share in scientific advancement and
its advantages." this text attracts on archived documentation to indicate that the contradiction
rests on an abstract obfuscation of human rights and informatics rights and is at odds each
with the history on the aims of the drafters of the UDHR and also the philosophical and legal
foundations of human rights and informatics rights.

TRIPS Agreement
Another point of controversy is the TRIPS Agreement, which advocated high minimum
standards of Intellectual Property Rights protection for all World Trade Organisation (WTO)
members. Non-compliance with the terms of the agreement can result in trade sanctions. This
treaty has negative implications for the underdeveloped countries, whose previous
commitment to Intellectual Property Rights protection was almost close to zero. Transfer of
technology to the developing countries will be adversely affected, due to high minimum
standards of protection for new inventions and technologies. Furthermore, it will affect the
economic, social and cultural aspects of human rights. For example, due to high minimum
standards of protection for patented pharmaceuticals, there will be too many restrictions on
the access to these pharmaceuticals, which would adversely affect one’s right to health. Thus,
the practical application of the treaty will be difficult, unless it is viewed from a human rights
perspective.

Copyrights and its link with Human Rights:

Copyright protection is not per se a human right, but it is a tool which protects the human
rights of authors and publishers. Copyright has two elements that relate to human rights: it
has an element linked to someone’s personal creativity and identity and it has an economic
aspect. As an author’s right, copyright is not expressly mentioned in international human
rights treaties and conventions. Instead, international treaties and national constitutions
allude to it by giving creators and scientists the benefit of protection of “the moral and
material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is
the author.” As a property right, copyright is a form of intellectual property (IP) and
therefore enjoys protection as part of the human right to property. This is enshrined in
Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Copyright law is a tool for resolving
the conflict between human rights and policy obligations: on one hand, the objective to
enable citizens to have access to culture and on the other, to ensure that scientists and
authors (potentially the same individuals) are able to support their livelihood through their
research findings and creative endeavours. The latter creates much of the culture the
former wish to access. Copyright impacts on freedom of expression, both of the author and
of members of the public who wish to distribute the author’s works as part of their own
freedom of expression. Freedom of expression does not just mean the freedom to express a
certain opinion. It includes the choice of medium, so that an author can choose, for
example, whether he would like to distribute a work over open access licences on the
Internet, or through a publisher via a publishing agreement. The latter will expressly detail
the timing, format and territory of publication, a further expression of the author’s freedom.
Authors also have the right to stay silent, i.e. not to publish their works.

Commercialization has introduced market considerations into the conduct of science. It has
eroded the distinction in many areas of scientific research between basic research, where
intellectual property rules are primarily concerned with the attribution of ideas and findings,
and applied research, where intellectual property and proprietary concerns predominate. This
has particularly been the case in computer science and biotechnology. Commercialization has
also changed intellectual property from a means to provide incentives to researchers and
inventors to a mechanism to encourage investment and protect the resources of investors.
Corporate investment in scientific research and development has imposed constraints on
science’s tradition of open publication. In many scientific fields, particularly the life sciences,
some scientists are delaying publication and withholding data so as to secure intellectual
property rights. There is widespread concern in the scientific community that privatization,
accompanied by legal restrictions and high prices, will restrict scientists’ access to data
needed for their research.

You might also like