Differentiated Instruction
Differentiated Instruction
Differentiated Instruction
ARIES R. MESINA
ARJAY M. CANLAS
JANUARY 2020
Table of Contents
Conceptual Framework……………………………………………..
Hypothesis………………………………………………………….
Definition of Terms……………………………………………….
Method ……………………………………………………………………
Research Design………………………………………………….
Respondents ………………………………………………………
Instruments ……………………………………………………….
who ‘already difference instruction’. Rather that teacher is fully aware in the classroom
can reveal one more way to make the classroom a better match for its learners”
(Tomlinson, 2001)
Some agree that learning math is difficult while others do not. Determining the
leaners ‘ level of intelligence is an edge to create different activities that will cater better
mathematical understanding.
The main problem that the researcher wants to study is the low performance in
mathematics of the Grade Two (2) learners of San Isidro Elementary School this School
Year 2019 – 2020. It is inclined with the following reasons: poor study habits, social media
influence, and poor reading comprehension. The reason why learners have a poor study
Through the rapid influence of social media, more learners found it difficult to
study their lessons and spend more time using gadgets than to study. While, poor reading
contributory factors.
researcher will make use of Differentiated Instructions to enhance the study habits of the
learners by using peer group tutoring and modern instructional materials, the researcher
will also integrate the use of technology in the teaching – learning process by using an
Finally, the researcher will create Innovative instructional materials such as the integration
teaching pupils, providing teachers with the ability to make changes in their curriculum,
teaching strategies, and classroom activities, based on the diverse needs of their pupils. The
problem was that a lot of educators did not employ DI in teaching mathematics, which
wedge pupil’s academic performance and achievement scores. Teachers who are deficient
of skills and knowledge in using effective DI strategies might have advertently hinder
Mathematics is not a popular subject. Pupils tend to dislike it, especially when
they fail to obtain the desired academic results, and it can cause anxiety and even phobia.
The difficulties they find are not only due to insufficient knowledge of the elements of
math but also to the (in)ability to transfer knowledge of the face different situations
successfully (Irina Vasilescu, Scientix Ambassador, 2015). To conquer this occurrence, the
teacher needs to find another teaching method and activities that will stimulate, challenge,
and enhance the mathematical abilities of the learners. The classical approach in teaching
Math creates passive learners: while it’s important to engage pupils to have them take an
role that mathematics plays in the world, to make well-founded judgments and to use and
the centerpiece of mathematics education in the US for more than a decade, and their
influence has been apparent in the growth in reform-based research, curricula, and methods
of assessment. Added to that, the Standards have moved all but one state in the country to
The study shows that if math teachers understood the needs of the learners to
learned in mathematics, they may use it in a more practical manner (Chamberlin, 2011;
Smeaton & Waters, 2013). According to Lorimer (2011) asserts that differentiation is a
matter of pedagogical importance and thus all efforts should be made to use it effectively
in schools. However, many teachers find their efforts to implement DI met with obstacles
that eventually discourage them using the method at all (Smeaton & Waters, 2013). There
is some research about DI and math instruction. Former study (Lorimer, 2011; Parsad &
Spegelman, 2012; Robinson & Lubienski, 2011) analyzed the perceptions of K12 teachers
successfully utilize DI in the classrooms (Tricarico & Yendol – Hoppey, 2012). If these
effectively.
dramatically, the diversity of teaching strategies among seasoned teachers tends to stay the
of innovation and passion for learning among students” (Butt & Kausar, 2010, p. 107), it
effective as current research declares it to be. Since the vast majority of classrooms are
comprised of students with varying levels of ability, maximizing the intellectual potential
of students should be the main objective of every classroom (Bloom, 2010); yet
(Martin & Pickett, 2013). It has been suggested that the use of DI by teachers may bridge
the gap, contribute to curricular improvement, and unleash student learning potential and
increase learning growth (Parsad & Spiegelman, 2012). Differentiated instruction, also
students to access the same classroom curriculum by providing entry point, learning tasks,
and outcomes that are tailored to students’ needs (Hall, Strangman, & Meyer, 2003). As
solving problems, achievement in, and attitudes towards math in six graders with learning
disabilities in cooperative groups by Mourad & Amaal (2013), results appear to indicate
problems, achievement in, and attitudes towards math test scores of students with learning
disabilities. The study has referential adequacy because this study could be replicated for
any performance task by any teacher wanting to test how students perform when learning
complete a certain assignment, especially if it does not resemble what the students might
students the reasons behind the various lessons and activities I presented to them. I also
included them in decision – making processes as frequently as possible. While I was sifting
through my data and sketching out the themes that I saw emerging concerning my research
question, according to Constanzo, 2001 in her study Adult Multiple Intelligences and Math.
trend is emerging: while the diversity of student populations upsurges dramatically, the
diversity of teaching strategies among seasoned teachers tends to stay the same (Hewitt &
Weckstein, 2012). As teachers play “a critical role in fostering the spirit of innovation and
passion for learning among students” (Butt & Kausar, 2010, p. 107), it is vitally necessary
research declares it to be. Since the vast majority of classrooms are comprised of students
with varying levels of ability, maximizing the intellectual potential of students should be
the main objective of every classroom (Bloom, 2010); yet, unfortunately, student potential
seems often to be separated from student performance (Martin & Pickett, 2013). It has been
suggested that the use of DI by teachers may bridge the gap, contribute to curricular
improvement, and unleash student learning potential and increase learning growth (Parsad
curriculum by providing entry points, learning tasks, and outcomes that are tailored to
students’ needs (Hall, Strangman, & Meyer, 2003). As a facilitator of learning we have
different pupils with different needs and characteristics so we need to have different
Conceptual Framework
Figure 1 presents the schematic diagram of the study that will be of used in
gathering pertinent data in assessing the differentiated activities based on the needs in
performance.
In contrast, the controlled group will continue the conventional instruction wherein
they will just discuss all the lessons covered and apply quality standards prescribed by the
DepEd.
The pre-test and post-test results of the pupils in the experimental group will be
compared to the pre-test and post-test of the pupils in controlled group. The researcher will
identify from the results if the differentiated instruction activities is more effective than the
Mathematical
Performance
Research Problem
graders mathematical performance in San Isidro Elementary School, Sta. Ana District.
Hypothesis
who experience differentiated instruction and for those pupils experience conventional
teaching.
The result of this study will be significant to the school heads, teachers’ and future
researcher.
materials and equipment providing funds. To facilitate the learning and capacitate their
teachers in Mathematics.
Teachers as the facilitators of learning may determine the different activities that
the learners need and create or replicate the activities in teaching concepts in Mathematics
Future Researcher. This study may serve as reference in conducting the same
study.
San Isidro Elementary School, Sta. Ana District which has a total population of
Fifty-eight (58) Grade Two pupils. The conduct of the study will be confine in this school
and in one particular grade level with two sections where in the first section serve as the
control group and the second section serves as the experimental group. Apparently, the
lack of funds and materials will serve as a delimitation of this study. The data for the
Definition of Terms
To better understand this study, the following terms are defined operationally and
technically:
education. In this study, it refers to the result of the pre-test and post-test. According to the
refers to what the student has learned or what the skills gained usually measured by paper
enhance the mathematical proficiency of the pupils in Sixth Grade. According to Carol
Whether teachers differentiate content, process, products, or the learning environment, the
use of on-going assessment and flexible grouping makes this a successful approach to
instruction.
definitions are used when relating to this construct from a theoretical perspective;
mathematical ability can then be defined as the ability to obtain, process, and retain
participants of the study after the application of the activity made in teaching Mathematics
participants of the study before the application of the activity made or discussion of a
Methods
This chapter presents the method and techniques, population of the study,
instrument of the study, and the data processing and statistical treatment.
Research Design
This study will utilize the quasi experimental methods research in gathering data
and information to test and evaluate the effectiveness of the Differentiated Instruction in
School. Experimental design will be used in this study for the researcher to assess the used
one in which the investigatory primarily uses postpositive claim for developing
knowledge (i.e., cause and effect thinking, reduction to specific variables and
hypotheses and question, use of measurement and observation, and the test of
theories) employs strategies of inquiry such as experiment and survey and collect
data on predetermined instrument that yield statistics data. Quantitative research focuses
experiments and surveys, collects data on predetermined instruments that yield statistical
The researcher will used the pre-test-post-test design that involves three steps
: (1) administering a pre-test measuring the dependent variable; (2) applying the
experimental treatment are then evaluated by comparing the pre-test and post-test score.
This study will involve fifty-eight (58) Grade II pupils of San Isidro Elementary
School, Sta. Ana District, Division of Pampanga- a public non-central school located at
San Isidro, Sta. Ana, Pampanga. A total of fifty-eight (58) grade II pupil – respondent in
this study will participate twenty-nine (29) belong to the control group and twenty-nine
The table illustrates the total population of the respondents according to their
respective groups.
Table 1
Frequency Distribution of the Participants of the Study
One 29 50
Two 29 50
In getting the pupil-respondent, the purposive sampling technique will be used in selecting
the respondents for the study. Purposive or judgmental sampling enables the researchers to
use his/ her judgment to select cases that will best enable him/ her to answer the research
question (s) and to meet the objectives. This form of sample is often used when working
select cases that are particularly informative Neuman, 2005; cited by Saunders, et al.,
2010).
the study. Purposive sampling represents a group of different non – probability sampling
relies on the judgement of the analyst with regards to choosing the units (eg. people, cases)
being researched is very little, particularly when contrasted and likelihood examining
select two (2) classes with two (2) sections in Grade II. They will be purposively selected
since that these are only the sections that the researcher is handling.
Instrument
The major instruments that will be used in gathering data are the pre-test and post-
test in order to collect the data needed to validate the study. These instruments will be
Division of Pampanga.
informal manner so as not to inhibit and intimidated the respondents from answering.
Sample questions that will be asked to the participants include the following “Did you
learned best when we use Differentiated Instruction?” “Are you happy using the activities
Data Collection
Formal communication requesting for permission to conduct the study in San Isidro
Elementary School, Sta. Ana District, Division of Pampanga will be sought from the
Pampanga and to the concerned School Principal. Consent of parents will also be secured
with emphasis on the noble objective of the activity and the pupils’ safety. Upon approval,
To ensure the face and content validity of the pre-test, the draft will be presented to
the Measurement lesson paralleled to the lesson guide found on the Teachers Guide for
Mathematics II. Each lesson will be presented using the Differentiated Instruction
activities.
The researcher will personally administer the pre-test. In the administration of the
test, the researcher will ensure that the participants have a very clear understanding of how
to answer the specific questions in the test. They will be checked, tallied, tabulated and
Ethical Considerations
The researcher will strictly adhere to the ethical standards in conducting research
promulgated by the university. Written permission will be sought from concerned officials
permission from the parents as well to allow their children to participate in the
experimentation.
The researcher will assure to protect the study with the principles of privacy and
confidentiality. Data will be strictly kept and protected and will only be used in the nature
and the purpose of the study. Furthermore, the researcher will recognize the rights of the
participants to withdraw from the conduct of the study in case they choose to do so.
The data gathered will be treated using the SPSS statistics version 22. In analyzing
and interpreting the data collected, descriptive statistical tools such as frequency count,
percentage, mean and inferential statistical tools such as t-test and ANOVA will be used.
Likewise, the descriptive ratings and numerical ratings of the grades of the students
Meanwhile, mean will be used in treating the scores of the two groups in the pre-
test and in the post-test in Statement of the Problem numbers 1, and 2 and the effectiveness
The descriptive rating and numerical ratings on the innovation implemented by the
On the other hand, inferential statistics such as t-test will be used in determining
significant difference between the mean scores of the controlled and experimental groups
in their pre-test and post-test. The significant difference will be displayed with the output
of the SPSS statistics used in analyzing the data. Probability values greater than 0.05 will
signify no significant difference while values less than 0.05 will indicate significant
Bednar, Coughlin, Evans, & Sievers (2002) ““Using Multiple Intelligence Theory in
Math Teaching”. Retrieved from http://blog.scientix.eu/2015/01/using-multiple-
intelligence-theory-in-math-teaching/
Bianco, Matt (2015). “Why Math Is Important: The Student View”. Retrieved from
https://members.classicalconversations.com/article/why-math-important-student-
view
DepEd Order No. 73, s. 2012. “Guidelines on the Assessment and Rating of Learning
Outcomes under the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum”. Retrieved from
(http://www.deped.gov.ph)
Douglas, Burton and Durham (2008) “The Effects of the Multiple Intelligence Teaching
Strategy on the Academic Achievement of Eighth Grade Math Students” Retrieved
from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234613535_The_Effects_of_the_Multiple_
Intelligence_Teaching_Strategy_on_the_Academic_Achievement_of_Eighth_Grade
_Math_Students
Feuer, M., Towne, L;, & Shavelson, R. (2002). Scientific culture and educational
research. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031008004
Gilman, Lynn (Fall 2001) “The Theory of Multiple Intelligences”. Retrieved from
http://www.intelltheory.com/mitheory.shtml
Hoff, D. (2002). Bush to push for math and science upgrade. Education Week. 22(12),
19,24. Retrieved from http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/9401
Mourad Ali Eissa, PhD 1 Amaal Ahmed Mostafa2 2013 Integrating multiple intelligences
and learning styles on solving problems ,achievement in, and attitudes towards math
in six graders with learning disabilities in cooperative groups
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1980). An agenda for action. Reston, VA:
NCTM. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/More-
NCTM-Standards/An-Agenda-for-Action-(1980s)/
Silver , H. & Hanson , J. & Perini , M. ( 1997 ). Integrating Multiple intelligences and
learning styles . Educational Leadership ,Vol. 55(1), 22-27
The Times of India (2015). “The importance of maths in everyday life”. Retrieved from
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/guwahati/The-importance-of-maths-in-
everyday-life/articleshow/48323205.cms
https://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/CDC/cdcuploads/CDC_MENAO/SEA_Summary_
01.pdf
Department of Education
Region III
Division of Pampanga
District of Sta. Ana
SAN ISIDRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
San Isidro, Sta. Ana, Pampanga
Date:
Madam:
Greetings in the matchless name of our Lord Jesus Christ!
May this humble request merit your kind approval. Rest assured that the
information that will be found in our study will be treated with outmost confidentiality.
Thank you very much for your kind and God bless!
ARJAY M. CANLAS
ARIES R. MESINA
Researchers
Approved by:
CELIA B. ALARCON
Principal II, SIES
Department of Education
Region III
Division of Pampanga
District of Sta. Ana
SAN ISIDRO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
San Isidro, Sta. Ana, Pampanga
Madam:
Respectfully endorsed to your good office through the School Governance and
Operations Division the Action Research Proposal in Mathematics of Mr. Arjay M. Canlas
and Mr. Aries R. Mesina entitled “Differentiated Instruction: An Approach in
Increasing Second Graders Mathematical Performance” for approval.
CELIA B. ALARCON
Principal II, SIES