Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5K views

    University of California Santa Barbara Resolution Agreement With Department of Education

    Uploaded by

    The College Fix
    The university did not disclose the agreement to a California judge considering whether counsel to "John Doe" deserved "private attorney general fees" approaching half a million dollars. Those are available to parties who secure “an important right affecting the public interest” for a "broad class of people," such as accused students deprived of due process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    University of California Santa Barbara Resolution Agreement With Department of Education

    Uploaded by

    The College Fix
    5K views2 pages
    The university did not disclose the agreement to a California judge considering whether counsel to "John Doe" deserved "private attorney general fees" approaching half a million dollars. Those are available to parties who secure “an important right affecting the public interest” for a "broad class of people," such as accused students deprived of due process.

    Original Title

    University of California Santa Barbara resolution agreement with Department of Education

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The university did not disclose the agreement to a California judge considering whether counsel to "John Doe" deserved "private attorney general fees" approaching half a million dollars. Those are available to parties who secure “an important right affecting the public interest” for a "broad class of people," such as accused students deprived of due process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    5K views2 pages

    University of California Santa Barbara Resolution Agreement With Department of Education

    Uploaded by

    The College Fix
    The university did not disclose the agreement to a California judge considering whether counsel to "John Doe" deserved "private attorney general fees" approaching half a million dollars. Those are available to parties who secure “an important right affecting the public interest” for a "broad class of people," such as accused students deprived of due process.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Resolution Agreement

    Case No. 09-17 -2423


    University ofCalifornia Santa lsarhara

    \\/ i thout adrnini ng to an.y violation of" la \V, in order to resolve the cornpl iancc concerns idcntifi cd
    by the U.S. Department of l.ducaticm, Office for Civil Rights (OCR), in the investigation of the
    above-referenced complaint filed against the University of California Santa Barbara (the
    Lnivcrsity) pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments 01" 1972 (Tille IX). and its
    implementing regulation. the University agrces to take the actions in this Resolution Agreement
    (Agreement).

    1. Plan

    A. The llnivcrsity will develop and implement a plan (the Plan) III address: I) how to
    ensure that Tille IX in vest igations wi 11 be resolved ina reasonably prompt manner,
    particularly in situations in which a respondent has been subject to an interim
    suspension; 2) ensuring that the University is tracking promptness from the date a
    report is received, as opposed 10 solely the date an investigation is initiated; J) how
    the University will communicate effectively with respondents when a student has
    received an interim suspension but where a formal investigation has not yet been
    initiated; and 4) a protocol rot" how the University will consistently implement the
    provision or Section IOS.OS or the Lnivcrsity of California s Sexual Violence and
    Sexual Harassment policy to provide a "prompt hearing on the Interim suspension."

    l~. Reporting Requirements:

    I. Hy November 0 1,20 (S, the Lriivcrsity will submit to OCR a draft of the Plan
    required by Section LA. for OCR's review and approval. Within 30 days 0(·
    OC R' s approval () r the P Ian, the U ni vcrsity wi II distribute the final Plan to al I
    relevant starr and provide documentation to OCR that it has distributed the
    Plan. The University wil] subsequently provide OCR with documentation
    sufficient to demonstrate that the Lriivcrsity has effectively implemented the
    Plan.

    j By August I, 20! 9, the Lnivcrxity will provide information sufiicicnt far


    OCR to determine that the University is resolving Tille IX allegations in a
    prompt manner. That information shall include, at a minimum, the date the
    allegation was made, the date of any interim suspension, the date
    recommended findings were made by the Title IX office, the date the Office
    of Judicial Affairs issued its finat decision, and any communications with
    parties regarding investigations that last longer than the time period set out in
    l lniversity policy. This information will be provided for all Title IX
    a Ilcgations made from the date of tlli s agreement th rough the end of" the 20 I X-
    19 school year.
    Page 201'2: 09-17-2423

    n. Training

    A. By December 31, 20U( the University will provide training to all Title IX staff on the
    approved Plan described in Section I.A.

    8. Reporting Requirements:

    I. Within 30 days ofOCH's approval of the Plan. the University will identify an
    individual with relevant experience to conduct the training required by Section
    II.A and provide the name, title, and qualifications of this individual and a
    copy of the agenda and training materials for OCR's review and approval.

    2. Within 30 days of completing the training, the University will provide OCR a
    report that includes documentation that demonstrates the training occurred,
    including the date of the training, the namc(s) or the traincrts}, sign-in sheets
    with participant names and titles, a list or Title IX Office staff, and a copy of
    the final materials used by the Lnivcrsity in the training.

    111. Monitoring

    The University understands that by signing this Agreement, it agrees to provide data and other
    information in a timely manner. Further the University understands that during the monitoring
    of this Agreement, OCR may visit the LniVl:rsity, interview staff and students and request such
    additional reports or data as are necessary for OCR 10 determine whether the University has
    fulfilled the terms ofthis Agreement. Upon completion of the obligations under this Agreement,
    OCR shall close and dismiss this case.

    The University understands and acknowledges that OCR may initiate administrative enforcement
    or judicial proceedings to enforce the specific terms and obi igations of this Agreement. Before
    initialing administrative enforcement (34 c'F.R. §§ 100.9, 100.] 0), or judicial proceedings to
    enforce this Agreement, OCR shall give the Lnivcrsity written notice of the alleged breach and
    sixty (60) calendar days to cure the alleged breach.
    1")(6, (b)(7XC)

    .J!_/i7/J?
    j)avid Marshall, UCSf3 Executive Vice Chancellor Date

    You might also like