26537-Article Text-147230-1-10-20190103 PDF
26537-Article Text-147230-1-10-20190103 PDF
26537-Article Text-147230-1-10-20190103 PDF
ABSTRACT
Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a stability-indicating reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-
HPLC) method for the simultaneous estimation of the metformin and empagliflozin in tablet dosage forms.
Methods: The chromatographic conditions were optimized and it was run through Std. BDS (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 m) column with mobile phase
consisting of 0.1% orthophosphoric acid buffer: acetonitrile in the ratio of 50:50. The flow rate was 1 ml/min and optimized wavelength was 210 nm.
Temperature was maintained at 30°C.
Results: The retention times of metformin and empagliflozin were found to be 2.588 min and 3.679 min and percentage relative standard deviation
(RSD) of the metformin and empagliflozin was found to be 0.59 and 1.2, respectively. Percentage recovery was in the range of 100.01–100.65% for
metformin and empagliflozin, respectively.
Conclusion: A sensitive, rapid, and specific method has been developed for the simultaneous estimation of metformin and empagliflozin using RP-
HPLC in tablet dosage form.
Keywords: Metformin, Empagliflozin, Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, Validation, Stability indicating.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Innovare Academic Sciences Pvt Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/4. 0/) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2019.v12i1.26537
of one tablet was calculated. It was transferred into a 250 ml volumetric Linearity
flask 200 mL of diluent was added, sonicated for 25 min. Using diluent The linearity test was performed to ensure correlation response of
final volume was made and filtered. 0.2 ml was pipetted out from the concentration range of the analyte and the peak area. The linearity
filtered solution into a 10 ml volumetric flask and final volume was studies were performed using stock solution containing 850 µg/ml and
made with diluent. 5 µg/ml metformin and empagliflozin. These solutions were further
diluted with diluents to yield the concentration range of 2.215–
Assay preparation 1275 ppm and 1.25–7.5 ppm of metformin and empagliflozin. The
Stock solutions of standard preparations were made from the active correlation coefficients were calculated. The calibration plots are
pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and sample preparations were shown in Figs.4 and 5.
prepared from formulation using appropriate diluent. Working solutions
were prepared from stock solutions and both sample and standards were
injected into chromatographic system for the determination of assay.
Precision
The precision of the method was performed by intraday and interday
Validation of HPLC method[9,10] variation studies. The intraday and interday studies were performed by
injecting six injections of test preparations into the chromatographic
System suitability
system. The percentage RSD and SD were calculated. The results are
System suitability was carried out to check the system performance. All presented in Table 2.
the essential characteristics including the percentage RSD, the United
States Pharmacopeia (USP) tailing, the USP plate count, and the USP
resolution were verified. The results are shown in Table 1.
Accuracy
The accuracy was determined by calculating the percentage recoveries
of known amounts of each analyte of metformin and empagliflozin
Specificity
claim to the excipients, and the accuracy results were expressed as
The specificity of the method was carried out by injecting blank, placebo, percentage of analyte recovered. The results are shown in Table 3.
standard, and sample solutions into the chromatographic system. The
interference of the analyte peaks with the excipients was analyzed. Limit of detection (LOD) and Limit of quantification (LOQ)
The limit of detection (LOD) can be defined as the lowest amount of
analyte in a sample can be detected and limit of quantification (LOQ)
was determined as the lowest amount of analyte that was quantified.
These parameters were calculated using the formula,
a b
Fig. 1: (a) Chemical structure of metformin, (b) chemical
structure of empagliflozin
242
Susmita et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 12, Issue 1, 2019, 241-244
243
Susmita et al.
Asian J Pharm Clin Res, Vol 12, Issue 1, 2019, 241-244
244