What Is Sampling
What Is Sampling
What Is Sampling
Census and sampling are two methods of collecting survey data about the population that are
used by many countries. Census refers to the quantitative research method, in which all the
members of the population are enumerated. On the other hand, the sampling is the widely
used method, in statistical testing, wherein a data set is selected from the large population,
which represents the entire group.
Census implies complete enumeration of the study objects, whereas Sampling connotes
enumeration of the subgroup of elements chosen for participation. These two survey methods
are often contrasted with each other, and so this article makes an attempt to clear
the differences between census and sampling, in detail; Have a look.
Definition of Census
A well-organised procedure of gathering, recording and analysing information regarding the
members of the population is called a census. It is an official and complete count of the
universe, wherein each and every unit of the universe is included in the collection of data. Here
universe implies any region (city or country), a group of people, through which the data can be
acquired.
Under this technique, the enumeration is conducted about the population by considering the
entire population. Hence this method requires huge finance, time and labour for gathering
information. This method is useful, to find out the ratio of male to female, the ratio of literate
to illiterate people, the ratio of people living in urban areas to the people in rural areas.
BASIS FOR
CENSUS SAMPLING
COMPARISON
Study of Each and every unit of the Only a handful of units of the
population. population.
Sampling: Definition
Sampling is defined as the process of selecting certain members or a subset of the population
to make statistical inferences from them and to estimate characteristics of the whole
population. Sampling is widely used by researchers in market research so that they do not need
to research the entire population to collect actionable insights. It is also a time-convenient and
a cost-effective method and hence forms the basis of any research design.
For example, if a drug manufacturer would like to research the adverse side effects of a drug on
the population of the country, it is close to impossible to be able to conduct a research study
that involves everyone. In this case, the researcher decides a sample of people from
each demographic and then conducts the research on them which gives them an indicative
feedback on the behavior of the drug on the population.
Simple Random Sampling: One of the best probability sampling techniques that helps in
saving time and resources, is the Simple Random Sampling method. It is a trustworthy
method of obtaining information where every single member of a population is chosen
randomly, merely by chance and each individual has the exact same probability of being
chosen to be a part of a sample.
For example, in an organization of 500 employees, if the HR team decides on conducting team
building activities, it is highly likely that they would prefer picking chits out of a bowl. In this
case, each of the 500 employees has an equal opportunity of being selected.
Cluster Sampling: Cluster sampling is a method where the researchers divide the entire
population into sections or clusters that represent a population. Clusters are identified
and included in a sample on the basis of defining demographic parameters such as age,
location, sex etc. which makes it extremely easy for a survey creator to derive effective
inference from the feedback.
For example, if the government of the United States wishes to evaluate the number of
immigrants living in the Mainland US, they can divide it into clusters on the basis of states such
as California, Texas, Florida, Massachusetts, Colorado, Hawaii etc. This way of conducting a
survey will be more effective as the results will be organized into states and provides insightful
immigration data.
Reduce Sample Bias: Using the probability sampling method, the bias in the sample
derived from a population is negligible to non-existent. The selection of the sample
largely depicts the understanding and the inference of the researcher. Probability
sampling leads to higher quality data collection as the population is appropriately
represented by the sample.
Create an Accurate Sample: Probability sampling helps the researchers plan and create
an accurate sample. This helps to obtain well-defined data.
Budget and time constraints: The non-probability method when there are budget and
time constraints and some preliminary data has to be collected. Since the survey
design is not rigid, it is easier to pick respondents at random and have them take
the survey or questionnaire.
Difference between Probability Sampling and Non-Probability Sampling Methods
We have looked at the different types of sampling methods above and their subtypes. To
encapsulate the whole discussion though, the major differences between probability sampling
methods and non-probability sampling methods are as below:
Alternatively
Random sampling method. Non-random sampling method
Known as
Population
The population is selected randomly. The population is selected arbitrarily.
selection
Market
The research is conclusive in nature. The research is exploratory in nature.
Research
Sample Since there is method to deciding Since the sampling method is arbitrary,
the sample, the population the population demographics
demographics is conclusively
representation is almost always skewed.
represented.
Essentials of sampling
The following are some of the essentials of sampling.
1. The sample selected should be representative of the entire population. This may be achieved
by using the random sampling method.
2. The size of the sample must also be adequate. The larger the size of the sample, the greater
will be the accuracy of the results.
3. All the units of the universe should have the same chance of getting selected. The researcher
should not use his judgement in selecting the sample.
4. There should be no basic difference in the nature of the units of the universe.
Types of sampling
1. Simple random sampling
In this case each individual is chosen entirely by chance and each member of the population has
an equal chance, or probability, of being selected. One way of obtaining a random sample is to
give each individual in a population a number, and then use a table of random numbers to
decide which individuals to include.1 For example, if you have a sampling frame of 1000
individuals, labelled 0 to 999, use groups of three digits from the random number table to pick
your sample. So, if the first three numbers from the random number table were 094, select the
individual labelled “94”, and so on.
As with all probability sampling methods, simple random sampling allows the sampling error to
be calculated and reduces selection bias. A specific advantage is that it is the most
straightforward method of probability sampling. A disadvantage of simple random sampling is
that you may not select enough individuals with your characteristic of interest, especially if that
characteristic is uncommon. It may also be difficult to define a complete sampling frame and
inconvenient to contact them, especially if different forms of contact are required (email,
phone, post) and your sample units are scattered over a wide geographical area.
There are three methods of restricted random sampling each of which is briefly explained
below:
1) systematic
2) stratified
3) cluster
2. Systematic sampling
Individuals are selected at regular intervals from the sampling frame. The intervals are chosen
to ensure an adequate sample size. If you need a sample size n from a population of size x, you
should select every x/nth individual for the sample. For example, if you wanted a sample size of
100 from a population of 1000, select every 1000/100 = 10 th member of the sampling frame.
Systematic sampling is often more convenient than simple random sampling, and it is easy to
administer. However, it may also lead to bias, for example if there are underlying patterns in
the order of the individuals in the sampling frame, such that the sampling technique coincides
with the periodicity of the underlying pattern. As a hypothetical example, if a group of students
were being sampled to gain their opinions on college facilities, but the Student Record
Department’s central list of all students was arranged such that the sex of students alternated
between male and female, choosing an even interval (e.g. every 20 th student) would result in a
sample of all males or all females. Whilst in this example the bias is obvious and should be
easily corrected, this may not always be the case.
3. Stratified sampling
In this method, the population is first divided into subgroups (or strata) who all share a similar
characteristic. It is used when we might reasonably expect the measurement of interest to vary
between the different subgroups, and we want to ensure representation from all the
subgroups. For example, in a study of stroke outcomes, we may stratify the population by sex,
to ensure equal representation of men and women. The study sample is then obtained by
taking equal sample sizes from each stratum. In stratified sampling, it may also be appropriate
to choose non-equal sample sizes from each stratum. For example, in a study of the health
outcomes of nursing staff in a county, if there are three hospitals each with different numbers
of nursing staff (hospital A has 500 nurses, hospital B has 1000 and hospital C has 2000), then it
would be appropriate to choose the sample numbers from each hospital proportionally (e.g. 10
from hospital A, 20 from hospital B and 40 from hospital C). This ensures a more realistic and
accurate estimation of the health outcomes of nurses across the county, whereas simple
random sampling would over-represent nurses from hospitals A and B. The fact that the sample
was stratified should be taken into account at the analysis stage.
Stratified sampling improves the accuracy and representativeness of the results by reducing
sampling bias. However, it requires knowledge of the appropriate characteristics of the
sampling frame (the details of which are not always available), and it can be difficult to decide
which characteristic(s) to stratify by.
4.- Multi-stage sampling
Multi-stage sampling (also known as multi-stage cluster sampling) is a more complex form
of cluster sampling which contains two or more stages in sample selection. In simple terms, in
multi-stage sampling large clusters of population are divided into smaller clusters in several
stages in order to make primary data collection more manageable. It has to be acknowledged
that multi-stage sampling is not as effective as true random sampling; however, it addresses
certain disadvantages associated with true random sampling such as being overly expensive
and time-consuming.
3. Reliable:
If sample is taken judiciously, the results are very reliable and accurate.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
4. Organisational Convenience:
As samples are taken and the number of units is smaller, the better (Trained) enumerators can
be employed by the organisation.
5. More Scientific:
According to Prof R.A. Fisher, “The sample technique has four important advantages over
census technique of data collection. They are Speed, Economy, Adaptability and Scientific
approach.”
It is based on certain laws such as:
(a) Law of Statistical Regularity
(b) Law of Inertia of Large numbers
(c) Law of Persistence
(d) Law of Validity.
6. Detailed Enquiry:
A detailed study can be undertaken in case of the units included in the sample. Size of sample
can be taken according to time and money available with the investigator.
7. Indispensable Method:
If universe is bigger, there remains no option but to proceed for this method. It is specially used
for infinite, hypothetical and perishable universes.
Demerits:
1. Absence of Being Representative:
Methods, such as purposive sampling may not provide a sample, that is representative.
2. Wrong Conclusion:
If the sample is not representative, the results will not be correct. These will lead to the wrong
conclusions.
ADVERTISEMENTS:
3. Small Universe:
Sometimes universe is so small that proper samples cannot be taken not of it. Number of units
are so less.
4. Specialised Knowledge:
It is a scientific method. Therefore, to get a good and representative sample, one should have
special knowledge to get good sample and to perform proper analysis so that reliable result
may be achieved.
5. Inherent defects:
The results which are achieved though the analysis of sampling data may not be accurate as this
method have inherent defects. There is not even a single method of sampling which has no
demerit.
6. Sampling Error:
This method of sampling has many errors.
7. Personal Bias:
As in many cases the investigator, chooses samples, such as convenience method, chances of
personal bias creep in.
2. Definition
3. Key Differences
4. Conclusion
Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR
SAMPLING ERROR NON-SAMPLING ERROR
COMPARISON
Cause Deviation between sample mean and Deficiency and analysis of data
population mean
Sample size Possibility of error reduced with the It has nothing to do with the sample
increase in sample size. size.
Surrogate Error
Sampling Error
Measurement Error
Data Analysis Error
Population Definition Error
Respondent Error
Inability Error
Unwillingness Error
Interviewer Error
Questioning Error
Recording Erro
Respondent Selection Error
Cheating Error
Non-Response Error: Error arising due to some respondents who are a part of
the sample do not respond.
Key Differences Between Sampling and Non-Sampling Error
The significant differences between sampling and non-sampling error are mentioned in the
following points:
1. Sampling error is a statistical error happens due to the sample selected does not
perfectly represents the population of interest. Non-sampling error occurs due to
sources other than sampling while conducting survey activities is known as non-
sampling error.
2. Sampling error arises because of the variation between the true mean value for the
sample and the population. On the other hand, the non-sampling error arises because of
deficiency and inappropriate analysis of data.
3. Non-sampling error can be random or non-random whereas sampling error occurs in the
random sample only.
4. Sample error arises only when the sample is taken as a representative of a
population.As opposed to non-sampling error which arises both in sampling and
complete enumeration.
5. Sampling error is mainly associated with the sample size, i.e. as the sample size
increases the possibility of error decreases. On the contrary, the non-sampling error is
not related to the sample size, so, with the increase in sample size, it won’t be reduced.
Conclusion
To end this discussion, it is true to say that sampling error is one which is completely related to
the sampling design and can be avoided, by expanding the sample size. Conversely, non-
sampling error is a basket that covers all the errors other than the sampling error and so, it
unavoidable by nature as it is not possible to completely remove it.