Lsi 2004
Lsi 2004
Lsi 2004
COM
SPRAWL
INSIDE
Thanks to a winning design and powerful output coupled with light weight and diminutive form factor, Kara
is a perennial bestseller. With the addition of Panflex, Kara II inaugurates a new era of added flexibility and
directivity control. Kara II is a powerhouse with four-in-one directivity: one box meets the needs of any audience
geometry. Kara II morphs to fit any design, offering consistent coverage and SPL distribution where you want
it – and only where you want it. www.l-acoustics.com
A Quick Thank You.
(<0.7ms to be exact)
Built on our latest generation 96kHz XCVI core, SQ sets the new standard
for compact digital mixers — delivering pristine, high resolution audio
with a class-leading latency of <0.7ms.
Thank you for honoring the SQ Series with a second NAMM TEC Award for
Outstanding Technical Achievement in Small Format Console Technology.
Sound doesn’t evolve.
Sound systems do. Exceptional performance is the driving
force of the SL-Series. Bestowed with more dispersion control,
headroom, efficiency and functionality than any previous system,
the SL-Series delivers unparalleled sound reinforcement through
the steady advance of applied evolution.
DEPARTMENTS
10 TALKIN’ YAK Reconciling differences with artists
about the mix. BY JIM YAKABUSKI
EQUIPMENT
36 ROAD TEST Evaluating the new Bose SoundComm
B40 headset as well as the Audio Precision APx500 Flex
software-based analyzer.
BY MICHAEL LAWRENCE
IN EVERY ISSUE
subscriptions are $60 per year. For all other countries subscriptions are $140 per year, airmail.
All subscriptions are payable by Visa, Master Card, American Express, or Discover Card only. Send
all subscription inquiries to: Live Sound International, 111 Speen Street, Suite 200, Framingham,
MA 01701 USA. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Live Sound International, PO Box 989,
6 FROM THE EDITOR’S DESK Framingham, MA 01701. Periodical Postage paid at Framingham, MA and additional mailing offices.
Reproduction of this magazine in whole or part without written permission of the publisher is
8 NEWS prohibited. Live Sound International® is a registered trademark of EH Publishing Inc. All rights
reserved. 2020 EH Media, LLC. Check us out on the web at http://www.prosoundweb.com.
56 BACK PAGE
4 LIVE SOUND INTERNATIONAL APRIL 2020 www.ProSoundWeb.com
NEW SOUNDCOMM B40 HEADSET
This section offers information about services, educational The Audio Engineering Society is offering 3-month mem-
opportunities and more in light of the ongoing situation with berships for $25, or a 3-month bonus at the standard yearly
the COVID-19 pandemic. We’ve also included some (but cer- rate, through April 30, for both new and renewing members.
tainly not all) of the really positive things going on in the pro Enrolled audio students receive a bigger discount with AES
audio community at the present time. All of these opportunities Student Memberships starting at $10.
and further details can be accessed via the ProSoundWeb home
page – prosoundweb.com. Also don’t forget: SynAudCon offers a range of exceptional
online training ranging from beginner to advanced levels. Access
AV Industry Relief Resources is a public Facebook group ded- it directly at prosoundtraining.com. And Audinate Dante
icated to networking between industry professionals whose live- certification training – all three levels – is online and free of
lihoods have been charge (audinate.com).
impacted by the
widespread can- While the InfoComm 2020 show, slated for this June in Las
cellations of tours, Vegas, has unfortunately been canceled, the folks at AVIXA,
productions, and producer of InfoComm trade shows around the world, is now
the resulting lay- doing a weekly survey to access the impact of COVID-19 on
offs throughout the pro AV industry. A new survey and other information are
the professional published every Friday.
audio and video
community. From While still busy manufacturing loudspeakers, the crew at Inno-
job postings and barter offerings to aid resources, humanitarian vox Audio (based in St. Paul, MN) is building face shields
assistance, and helpful tips, the group is a place for pooling for local senior living communities
resources and helping each other. around the greater Minneapolis – St.
“Our industry is truly the original gig economy, and a great Paul area.
many of us who live tour to tour and paycheck to paycheck “Today I picked up an order of
have been hit hard by the shutdown, right at the begin- face shields for Walker Method-
ning of peak touring season,” explains David Rahn, North ist – 750 shields crafted to protect
American sales manager for Alcons Audio and a co-founder the health care teams serving our
of the group. “It’s more important now than ever before seniors,” says Mary Ryan, corpo-
for us to pull together and help each other. Whether it’s rate director at Walker Methodist
a temporary job or a heads-up about financial assistance, Senior Living Facility. “I couldn’t
sharing our connections and our collective knowledge can hug them, but I will when this
only be a good thing.” whole crisis is over. Bless you Chris
“We’re a diverse industry full of creative, talented people (Osgood) and Arnaud (Blesbois) of Innovox. Your hands
that has never failed to come together in times of crisis,” have created a guard to keep our people safe. I am forever
adds Daniel Keller, CEO of Get It In Writing. “Information grateful and honored to know you. Look for the helpers. They
is power, and communication is our most valuable asset. It’s are here.” (Innovox product designer Arnaud Bresbois is pic-
our hope that this group will enable those of us who need tured above wearing one of the face shields the company is
help to get it, and those of us who can offer help to connect producing.)
with those in need.” Due to material shortages, the Innovox team is still determin-
ing how many face shields they can assemble but will continue
Inspired by the COVID-19 quarantine, Practical Show Tech is as long as the need and supplies are there. (Check out PSW to
making use of social distancing time by sharing knowledge of see a video of the production process.)
live show production through a series of free live webcasts that
are happening on a daily basis. It’s founded by veteran audio/ Clair Global is partnering with Mountain Productions to
RF/production professionals Pete Erskine, Mac Kerr, Kelly integrate Clair’s turnkey solutions and custom designs into
Epperson and Bruce Kraemer. Mountain’s large-scale
temporary hospitals
A large number of manufacturers have stepped up to offer and disaster relief cen-
free live webinar and other online educational opportunities ters made necessary
focusing both on their own products as well as on a wide range by the Coronavirus
of pro audio technologies. Some of these companies include: outbreak.
Powersoft, Martin Audio, Rational Acoustics, QSC, “When we launched
Yamaha, Shure – see prosoundweb.com for more opportunities. the MTN Emergency
I
n “Mixing For The Boss” (LSI December 2018), I dis-
cussed a burden we all experience as audio engineers:
the unenviable task of mixing front of house for an
artist while “influential” friends, family members or managers
hover over our shoulder. Their opinions and comments, while at
times accurate and possibly even helpful, can put us in a tricky
position, especially if the advice is meant to favor their friend
or family member in a “decibel-tory” way. (You get my drift!)
I wrapped up that previous article noting that this isn’t always
the worst thing, because we can always take or leave that advice
at our discretion. But how do we, as FOH engineers hired to
make the artist sound great, approach advice given from that
artist directly? And how does one handle said advice if it causes
us to stop dead in our tracks and say, “Ah, nope – that’s not a
good idea at all.”
The pro audio community is really quite small, and tales of
certain legendary performers and their “signature sounds” get after “board tape” reviews late at night. Now that we have
around fairly quickly. When you’re in a room at the AES conven- YouTube with fans recording shows on their phones from the
tion and seven FOH engineers are telling the exact same story 99th row of the venue and posting them instantaneously, there
about a singer demanding the application of “ample amounts” is way more opportunity for the artist to critique the mix in a 3
of 8-second reverb to his vocal to make it sound “beautiful,” am text message while we’re trying to get some much-needed
you can piece together a pattern. You may also learn that some sleep in our bunk.
(if not all) of those seven audio engineers were either relieved
of their duties for “insubordination” or decided to walk away ASKING THE QUESTION
from the gig because of irreconcilable differences. In an attempt to take the bull by the horns, I often ask artists
So, what’s the solution? Do we: when I’m hired if there’s a particular album or live recording
A) Look the other way and take the fat paycheck while telling that captures the way they would like me to mix their show. If
ourselves the 8-second reverb tail with +6 dB of 10 kHz probably nothing else, it lets them know I truly care about their inter-
won’t haunt our dreams? pretation of how the show should sound instead of just mixing
B) Nudge the reverb down in the mix and shorten the decay to my taste.
time a bit so people stop dropping by the FOH mix position and I find artists are sometimes perplexed by this question and
pleading with us to “Turn the flipping echo down?” can’t always point to one piece of recorded work that captures
C) Attempt one more professional conversation with the boss the live feel they’re hoping to achieve, so they kind of generalize
to reiterate that while the other elements of the mix are really and answer with, “Just make us sound like us – only louder.”
pretty great, this “reverb thing” could be improved? Fair enough. That’s my initial approach anyway, and it almost
D) Become an accounts manager for an audio company, never always works out just fine.
mix a show again, and go to next year’s AES convention and Problems can arise, however, when we’re mixing by instinct,
add our name to the list of storytellers? translating the mix as we’re feeling it, and artists begin ques-
Tough choices for sure. I use this true-to-life example of tioning our work. Maybe they don’t like what they’re hearing
excessive reverb on the lead vocal, but there are many other on stage (which is sometimes unfair, seeing as how they’re
audio “differences of opinions” that arise between artists and behind the PA system), or it’s comments they’re receiving from
engineers. These differences can lead to unwanted discussions friends or colleagues.
for the listeners is in line with what show. If the quality of audio they seek doesn’t measure up to our
standards, we can always walk away, leaving our replacement as
the band would want to hear if the one with the hands on the faders while the patrons come
by voicing their displeasure.
they were able to come out front Perhaps at a future audio convention you’ll meet this succes-
sor and share a story and a laugh (and maybe the phone number
In the end, we hope our intuition regarding the sound we of a good therapist). LSI
amplify for the listeners is in line with what the band would
want to hear if they were able to come out front. If mixing Jim Yakabuski has spent more than 35 years as a live sound engi-
the show at 98 dBA feels just right but the band wants it neer, working with artists such Van Halen, Journey, Avril Lavigne,
at 106 dBA, tough times may be on the horizon. Or the Peter Frampton, and many others. He’s
low end is right where it should be to musically hold the also the author of “Professional Sound
mix together, but the artist wants to steam-roll the first 30 Reinforcement Techniques,” which pro-
rows, perhaps the wrong person is behind the console for vides a collection of tips and techniques for
this particular artist. mix engineers. It’s available via Amazon.
Monitor engineer Loreen Bohannon delivering mixes to Lizzo on a DiGiCo SD12 console late last year.
HEADS OR TAILS?
The pros and you’ve specialized in one role, either by
accident or design.
So, what are the pros and cons of mixing
FOH versus monitors?
cons of mixing In my early days I spent five years
learning the craft of live audio from the FOH PROS
front of house vs ground up; but having become competent Creativity. Out front, although you’re
across a broad base, it became clear that obviously mixing for the crowd, you’re
monitors. mixing monitors was the path that best essentially mixing for yourself – you
suited my personality and interest. It don’t do something if you don’t like
by Becky Pell helped that I had a wonderful teacher how it sounds – so it’s all down to your
and mentor in Fred “Gumby” Jackson, a preferences.
brilliant monitor engineer who counted Personal satisfaction. When the mix
W
hile there are plenty of Bruce Springsteen and Patti LaBelle sits “just right,” there’s huge fulfilment
multi-talented folks who mix amonst his credits – he could see traits in enjoying the audio art that you’ve
both front of house and mon- in me that would serve me well mixing created.
itors, and maybe also count PA system monitors, and generously shared his time Reflected glory. When a band is flying
teching amongst their skills, there are and knowledge. Likewise, I’m married to high and it all sounds great, you can bask
many engineers who lean towards one a front of house engineer (Chris Pyne) in the glow of a job well done.
discipline and become known exclu- who, after learning the ropes, realized Atmosphere. There’s a fantastic group
sively for that. It’s a good idea for anyone that being out front was his true calling. energy when an audience loves a gig, and
starting out in live audio to get a strong But what if the path isn’t so clear? you get to be right in the middle of it.
grounding in all areas – it makes you a There was an interesting thread recently Less band politics. With less focus
better engineer all round and maximizes on the Soundgirls Facebook group from on managing the different personalities,
your usefulness and employability – but a member wondering which way to go your job is to shape the sounds they’re
the day may come when you find that – or indeed whether to specialize at all. creating.
B
ack in 1962 an A&R rep at
Decca Records allegedly told
The Beatles that “guitar groups
are on their way out” when he declined
to sign the band, a quote often used as
a classic example of gross commercial
misjudgment. Here we are, 58 years
later, and the humble guitar is still going
strong, remaining a popular choice of
up-and-coming acts as well as established
artists. What is it about the guitar that
continues to make it the weapon of choice
for so many musicians?
Part of the appeal of the guitar lies
in its polyphony (i.e., the ability to pro-
duce more than one note at once), which
means it’s equally adept accompanying a
solo singer or as part of an ensemble –
whether it be banging out fat chords or
picking out soaring melodies or lead lines.
The guitar also offers a wide range of
playing expression not found on other
polyphonic instruments. Basic dynamic microtonal or whole tone pitch shifting in the increasingly large big band ensem-
control, like many instruments, is through string bending. Take all of this bles of the time. Early pioneers discov-
achieved by varying the velocity at which into account and the guitar makes the ered that by winding coils of wire around
the strings are struck but you also have a keyboard look a bit like a series of inar- a magnet and placing it close to metal
choice of what you strike the strings with, ticulate binary switches. strings, the vibrations of the strings could
be it fingers, nails or plectrums – all of The sheer versatility of the guitar and be converted, via electromagnetic induc-
which affect the character of the sound. the wide range of sounds it can produce tion, into a weak electrical signal that
Further, there’s a range of subtle explains why it’s equally at home plucking could then be amplified.
tonal variations available depending on out folk melodies, chugging heavy metal Run an electric guitar directly (DI)
where the strings are struck – the sound power chords, threading its way through into a mixing desk and you may be sur-
is sharper closer to the bridge and then a jazz odyssey or laying down the funk. prised to find that the sound is actu-
gets progressively duller towards the For the sake of this article I’m going to ally quite thin and twangy in its natural
neck, plus the plucking hand can also focus on the electric guitar (with a sidebar form. Early amplifiers were often just
dampen and mute the strings to achieve on acoustic guitars). repurposed PA systems, but guitarists
a range of dynamics and effects. And soon gravitated towards specifically
that’s just one hand – the fretting hand RECOGNIZING THE WHOLE designed amplifiers that not only offered
can also influence the sound depending The electric guitar came into being in the a greater degree of control over the input
on how the strings are fretted as well 1930s in response to the need to amplify signal but also enhanced and compli-
as being able to introduce vibrato and the instrument in order for it to be heard mented the sound.
N-RAY
Check out Dynamic Air Flow Cooling (DAC) at
www.codaaudio.com
BACKSTAGE CLASS
Left to right, Shure SM57 joined by two Sennheiser models, the e609 and MD421.
Most guitar amplifiers are comprised of tarist will not only be adept at playing the Shure SM57, Sennheiser e609 and Senn-
a pre-amp and a power amp. The pre-amp instrument but will also have a thorough heiser MD421, and I tend to gravitate
enables adjustment of the sound while understanding of how the amplifier works towards the SM57 (I’ve been quoted in
the power amp makes that sound louder. and how it can be manipulated. This the past as stating that if you can’t get a
The pre-amp also typically gives the oper- explains why we almost always employ decent guitar sound with an SM57 then
ator the ability to shape the sound with microphones on amplifiers to capture the you might want to consider a career in
EQ and drive controls, and will often designated sound, which neatly brings us lighting).
include vacuum tubes designed to add to mic choices. In live sound we typically put the mic
pleasing coloration. The loudspeaker, and Dynamic mics are typically better right up against the front grille of the
how it’s driven, can also have an effect on suited to the job on live stages because amp cabinet pointing directly into one
the overall sound because it will distort they can handle higher sound pressure of the speakers (a quick listening test
in particular ways that can add compli- levels while being able to capture the can help in deciding the best choice for
mentary overtones. warmth and body of the sound; they a given guitarist and application). This
Therefore, it’s important to realize that also tend to roll off lower and higher placement helps ensure the capture of
the whole of the electric guitar sound is frequencies that helps prevent mud- as much of the direct sound as possible
achieved through a very careful symbiosis diness and harshness. The three most while minimizing leakage from other
of instrument and amplifier. A good gui- common choices I’ve seen used are the nearby sound sources. The positioning
Acoustic Guitars
The electric guitar was invented because acoustic guitars weren’t loud enough, but in an ironic twist, sonically they differ
enough that sometimes an acoustic is the only way to get that “authentic” sound. It can be a challenge using acoustics on
the live stage, especially in an ensemble with loud drums and amplifiers, in terms of attaining enough gain before feedback.
Further, the type of microphone that best captures acoustic guitar sound (i.e., a capacitor) is prone to picking up a lot of
unwanted leakage if adjacent to other instruments. As a result, often the best solution is use of an electro-acoustic guitar
(i.e., an acoustic guitar with an internally mounted pick-up or mic).
Electro-acoustic guitars probably have the widest range of potential sounds of any instrument I’ve come across, and any-
one who’s ever worked an acoustic night knows that no two ever sound exactly the same. Most folks run them direct (DI), and
I always recommend using a pre-amp specifically designed for acoustic guitars to get the best result. If necessary, feedback
issues can usually be reduced by fitting a sound hole baffle – a rubber stopper that fits in the hole to reduce the air move-
ment and thus the resonance in the body and across the soundboard of the instrument.
It’s always good to be aware that you might process and EQ an acoustic guitar differently depending on whether it’s being
used for solo accompaniment or within a loud ensemble. For example, in the former there’s no bass instruments so you can get
a fuller sound, whereas in the latter you might go for a thinner, more percussive sound to enable it to cut through the mix. LSI
TAKING ACTION
A handy trick I often use with open-back
cabinets is to put an additional mic in
the back. Once I flip the polarity of this Figure 1
signal and combine it with the front mic,
I find the second mic adds a lot of body.
This then enables me to achieve a range
of sounds, from subtle rhythm to choppy
lead, simply by moving the two faders
throughout the song or set.
Also be aware that whenever using
directional mics close to the source,
you will encounter the proximity effect
(whereby the bottom end is artificially
enhanced). This can make guitars sound
boomy and cause them to mask the fre-
quencies of other instruments, such as
the bass guitar, making the whole mix
sound muddy. The best way to combat
this is with a high-pass filter (HPF), as
shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2
While this is a great first step in min-
imizing proximity effect, I find that the Eventually I get to the point where the fact that you no longer need to haul
slope of most HPFs (typically 24 dB per bringing up the fader just increases the around that massive 4 x 12 cabinet.
octave) can be a bit too steep to fully volume, which means that I’m now rea- Most live consoles also now include
negate it. Therefore, a slope of 12 dB per sonably accurately reproducing the sound onboard amp and speaker modelling
octave (at a slightly higher frequency) is of the amplifier. I use this as the starting plugins that can be quite handy when
more likely to get the job done. point from which I can process the sound a guitarist turns up without an amp or
Unfortunately not all live consoles further, if necessary, to make the guitar the basic sound would benefit from being
offer the option to change the HPF slope, sit properly in the mix. re-amped. Having fewer amps on stage
but the same effect can be achieved using It could be argued that in this modern will invariably have a positive impact on
an EQ filter with a low Q. Figure 2 shows age of advanced digital processing we can the front of house mix, especially if used
the same HPF, to which I’ve added a -6 dB ditch the guitar amps all together in favor in conjunction with in-ear monitoring,
filter at 120 Hz with a Q of 0.5. of amp modelling and speaker simulation thus ensuring a more consistent sound
Once the amp is miked up and proxim- software. Various stand-alone units are for both the audience and the musicians.
ity effect dealt with, I then listen to the available as well as computer software LSI
ambient sound of the amp while slowly capable of real-time processing. One obvi-
bringing up the fader on the mic. If I ous advantage of this approach is that you Andy Coules is a sound engineer and audio
hear the sound change as the two sig- can model a wide range of amp and cabinet educator who has toured the world with a
nals combine then I EQ accordingly and combinations while effortlessly being able diverse array of acts in a wide range of
repeat. to switch between them, not to mention genres.
A
s a young man, I fell in love
with motorcycle racing – a
full-on obsession which,
luckily, I couldn’t afford. While
studying the minutiae of my new
obsession, I came across a book titled
“Twist of the Wrist: The Motorcycle Roadracers Handbook,” But time and again, laboratory experiments and real-life
by Keith Code. Long considered the racer’s bible, this in-depth experiences show that our attention span is finite. We each have
book dissects and distills the techniques required to ride these a personal maximum of data points and details we can manage,
dangerous machines. some more, some less, most dictated by circumstance, some by
One of the book’s concepts resonated with me so much that ability. If we overload our attention, we will miss something.
I mindfully practice it every day, especially while mixing: as Sometimes that thing we miss can be show stopping.
thinking human beings, we have a finite amount of atten-
tion. Code uses the metaphor of currency to explain how our JUGGLING ACT
fixed amount of attention can be quantified and budgeted Modern advancements in live audio have made mixing a more
for expected use. complicated challenge than it was just 10 to 20 years ago. More
Using his example, let’s say I have $10 worth of attention. inputs, more outputs, more screens, more levels of control and
That’s the total fixed amount of attention my brain can provide the incessant inclusion of virtual “gear” insertable into our
under full concentration. To accomplish all of my job, I must mixes as digital plugins.
budget that attention so that each individual task is properly
monitored and controlled while still keeping an eye on the
multitude of things that could go wrong, or that might benefit
from a bit of fiddling.
Code writes about spending his $10 worth of attention on
maneuvering motorcycles at high speeds and hurling them
through chicanes and hairpins without making contact with
the 40 other people who covet your spot. His budget consists
of things such as spending $1 on his tachometer, 50¢ on the
asphalt conditions, $1.25 on the motorcycles around him, $2.25
on his tire adhesion, $3 on the next braking marker, and so on.
Every single thing we look at, listen to, analyze, or compare
requires attention. We can’t create additional attention, we can
only utilize what we have and make the most efficient use of it
to help accomplish the job. By creating an organizational system
Code used his metaphor to reinforce his observations about
the brain’s limited ability to multitask. We tend to think we can requiring minimal amounts of attention
always “keep up” with just one more detail. That our brains are to process, we can stay on top of issues
elastic enough to fit more data points or musician monitor mix
requests into our attention span. with reduced fuss and distraction
T
wo of the most common ques-
tions I receive during private
lessons in my “Guerrilla Mixing”
course are “What’s the best console?”
and “What console should I buy?” The
subsequent conversations reveal that the
answers to these questions actually mean
different things to different people.
With that in mind, here are factors
that determine why I prefer to work with
particular consoles. However, they can Allen & Heath dLive
be summed up pretty simply: The best
console is the right one for the job. alities are fickle and stubborn and tend to These factors must always be accounted
In other words, there is no single defin- rear their ugly heads right before a show). for. You can’t operate a summer festival
itive answer. Different consoles are made A console installed in a venue might be show in the August heat if the system
with different applications in mind, and have issues with proper ventilation or vari- components might not work in that
many cover a rather specific segment of ous operators bringing their session files on environment. For me, the number one
live audio. True, a single console might suspicious drives. If used for touring, there mark of a great console is its reliability
cover the majority of applications, but it are a number of adversities to be endured during the most demanding conditions.
certainly wouldn’t be the optimal choice – load-ins/load-outs, transportation, rapid It’s more important than the sound, user
for every event. Broadcast has completely changes in temperatures and humidity, interface, the network protocol – I need a
different demands than musical theatre, dust, power surges, accidental liquid spills mix system that gives me the best chance
which is quite removed from classical – in fact, sometimes it is a small miracle of successfully finishing the show.
concerts, and so on. they can withstand all the cruel conditions
Even within a manufacturer’s product we tend to expose them to. SUFFICIENT I/O & COMPACT
line there are usually models designed Not only that, but they have to inter- FOOTPRINT
and more heavily promoted for one pri- face with stagebox units, other consoles, You can have a favorite console at your
mary segment, due to specific function- various networks and remote access, disposal but if it can’t meet all I/O
alities either on the software side or the which provides additional potential demands, then it’s not right for the job.
actual hardware itself. However, there points of failure. I can’t even count the A console must be able to meet all input
are some common questions and consid- times I thought there were issues with a and output needs, as well as a bit of addi-
erations to keep in mind when deciding console that turned out to be a bad cable tional “wiggle room.”
which console to employ for a given job or a stagebox gone haywire. Even on tours carrying their own gear,
at hand, provided you have more than Many manufacturers design equipment working with the same artist for a lon-
one option available. with robustness in mind – it doesn’t matter ger period of time, somewhere down the
in what order the devices are plugged in or line there might be a demand to accom-
RELIABILITY turned on, they just work. However, others modate a special guest star appearance
Mixing consoles are machines (or to say can be quite demanding on the operator or a recording session of a live show. If
more specifically with respect to digital to adhere to a specific order of operations. a console doesn’t allow for these types
boards: computers with dedicated inter- Further, some models might be designed of additions, well, you’ll have to find a
faces), and as such they eventually break to withstand higher differences in tempera- replacement and reprogram the entire
down and/or show signs of developing their ture while others are more conscientious show (burdening yourself with additional
own personalities (usually those person- about dust management. work and the production with additional
cost), or tell management it can’t be done done by a clever user interface layout that
– which, in turn, could potentially mean enables us to be a mix engineer as well as
you’ll be looking for a new employer. a console operator, and this is definitely a
However, it also works in the opposite major factor for me in determining what
direction – overkill can be just as bad. If console to use. Particularly for touring
you’re certain the performer needs 24 engineers that don’t travel with their own
inputs and the entire show can be han- equipment, the ability to be fast on an
IMPRESSIVELY
PROFESSIONAL
PORTABLE PA SYSTEM
SAVE
SIMPLE SETUP AND CONTROL ALLOWS $ 100
YOU TO FOCUS ON YOUR PERFORMANCE on STAGEPAS PA Systems
Offer Expires 6/30/20
Yamaha.io/Stagepas
– Best in Class Wireless Control + Audio via Bluetooth
– 1000W High Output Class-D Power Provides 119dB max SPL
available. Tracks were on another section where I always had a sense to me (and probably only to me). For the most part during
visual on what was coming at me and from where (this would a show I stay in Bank 1 and 2 unless I need to touch a specific
change daily), and the final section was four layers of live band. input. Also, these two banks may contain copies of inputs from
I could flip between whatever was needed for solos, etc. the other banks along with groups, etc. The center section is
I find generally once drums are dialed in I rarely need to usually banks that are groups, DCAs and matrix outputs that
change things so I will group drums together in one (or two if are in order for quick access. There may be copies of individual
needed) banks and set it and forget it. Instruments like guitars, groups, DCAs, matrix outputs in Bank 1 and 2 as well – I basi-
keys, etc. tend to need more managing so I try to keep them all cally call them my “show” banks, providing access to things I
on one bank for easy access. require quick access to.
Further, any vocal channels (particularly a Lead Vocal) are
Becky Pell (monitors): My first port of call for managing large copied in the same place in all banks, so if I’m buried in my
channel counts is setting up my fader banks in the way that input banks and working on something, I can still reach a vocal
makes most sense for my workflow – in these days of digital quickly for effect cues, etc. If the lead vocal lives on Fader 25
desks it’s so easy to break free of the channel list and do what of Bank 1, it gets Fader 25 on all banks – I always have access
works for me. Typically, I have all drums and click track in one to it, no matter what. I only do this with vocals.
bank (or two, if we have a gear-heavy drummer or additional Also, for possible emergency scenarios, I make layers that
percussion), then keys, guitars and bass in another, and tracks are copies of opposite fader banks. So, for instance, on Layer 2
in another. They’re all on the left side of my desk, and then I of Bank 1, Faders 1 through 12 are a copy of Bank 1, Faders 25
always have the vocal bank on the right, as well as a bank of through 36. (Confused yet?) So, I have a copy of an opposite
other musical inputs (say, strings, brass, etc.) if they’re part fader bank if an entire fader bank goes on the fritz or one fader
of the show. My “utility” inputs are always to my right as well, in that bank malfunctions. Remember, gear breaks and I always
low down in the banks – things like talk mics, pink noise, all try to leave myself an out. Don’t get caught in the middle of a
the stuff that’s less frequently accessed. show without the ability to get at something.
I don’t use groups at all, but I use DCAs a lot. I have one for Finally, I always land every input and fader, even channels I’m
all hard drive track content, so I can pull it down if some editing not using. I don’t ever want to be in a situation where there’s a
is happening when musicians want to keep rehearsing (and I’ll channel that is open and not landed. If someone plugs something
make the mix to the person doing the editing pre-fade). I use into that input, by accident or otherwise, and it is not landed,
them to safeguard what’s coming out of wedges and side fills you’ll never be able to see what is happening with that open input.
too. For example, with my current band there are four singers If this happens to you (raises hand), you’ll never do it again.
who are all either on or off stage at the same time. I don’t want
a performer’s mic live anywhere on stage – including to other Ryan O John (FOH): As it turns out, I only have two hands...
musicians – when they’re offstage, but they still want it in but that’s what snapshots and events are for – they’re my extra
their own in-ear monitors for peace of mind. So, I split the mic hands! Even in shows with 100 or more channels, for the most
down two channels, one of which goes to themselves and one to part, with some exceptions, only 50 to 60 of those inputs are
everywhere else (which allows me to EQ them differently too). being used at any given time. I still don’t have 50 to 60 fingers
The “self” one stays live at all times, the other is controlled by though, so those inputs need to be stemmed down to some
a DCA that I can pull down when they’re offstage. controllable number of faders and knobs. My typical layout:
Finally, I’m a big fan of macros. With everyone on IEMs, I’m inputs, groups, and VCAs all interspersed across the surface.
often as much a switchboard operator as a monitor engineer, so The idea is to get as many inputs into as few faders as man-
to ensure I can easily have control over, say, whether the band’s ageable but still give you good control and quick access to the
talk mics are going to FOH’s shout speaker (which might be desir- layers underneath. So, this could easily be achieved with VCAs,
able at sound check but not during the show), I’ll set up a variety such as being able to put your entire drum kit into a single VCA,
of macros to give me fast access to whatever functions I need. all bass inputs into a Bass VCA, all guitars or keys or vocals,
etc., until all inputs are covered.
Ken “Pooch” Van Druten (FOH): I build banks of things that But VCAs have their limitations, the first being that they’re
I prioritize by importance and how often I need access to them. actually just a control group and don’t typically have metering;
Bank 1 on my console is often a mixture of input channels, and the second being limitations of certain platforms – most
groups, DCAs and matrix outputs. Anything that I need access analog and some digital desks only let you assign input faders to
to in a fast moment, I know that any time I go back to Bank 1, VCAs, which affects how you may want to use groups. Groups,
chances are that I have access to something I need quickly. This on the other hand, have metering, and can also add serial pro-
sometimes carries over into Bank 2 as well. cessing to the channels assigned to it.
Past the first two banks, I start organizing inputs by instru- Ultimately I see the solution as a mix of both of these to
ments. Bank 3 is often drums across the entire console, Bank 4 achieve max control from minimal physical faders. My typical
is bass and guitar, and so on. I set these up in order that makes show uses a heap of groups – Kick Group, Snare Group, Drum
When mixing FOH, I use both VCAs and groups – usually Scott Holtzman (FOH): The key to handling large channel
two groups for drums. Group 1 has the whole kit and Group 2 counts is organization. Start with a plan, study the input list
is the kit minus cymbals and hi-hat, which is pretty “squashed” and create meaningful groups not just on instrument type but
(heavily compressed). I blend that with Group 1 for a punchier also tonal grouping. For example, putting drums, bass and low-
more “in your face” drum sound with parallel processing. Group end synths on one group, strings in another, then brass. Lead
3 is bass (DI+Amp+FX), 4 is Guitars, 5 is Keys, 6 is Background instruments and vocal will need their own faders.
Vocals, 7 is Lead Vocal and 8 is FX. My VCAs are very similar: Once you create groups, DCAs and subgroups are the next
1 is Drums, 2 is Bass, 3 is Guitars, 4 is Keys, 5 is Playback, 6 is piece of the puzzle. They allow the logical groups you created
Background Vocals, 7 is Lead Vocals and 8 is FX. to be managed with a single fader. Lastly, create custom fader
When mixing monitors – and if my star’s IEMs are on the layers that put together the groups and lead faders so you have
Main L-R outputs – I use groups and VCAs the same way I do access to the majority of the mix on one layer.
when mixing FOH. But if I have all the IEM mixes on Aux only, If an orchestra is part of the production, consider a second
then I just use the inputs on sends on fader to mix. That said, desk and mix engineer for the orchestra mix. The main mix then
the Avid S6L now offers VCAs on Aux sends when on Sends on only has to deal with the input from the orchestra engineer.
Fader mode. Say the guitar player asks me to bring all the drums This approach also works in theatrical productions.
up but leave the blend as is. Instead of grabbing all drum faders Speaking of theater, managing large amounts of wireless
and moving them. I can assign them to a VCA and it will act as systems is a difficult challenge. Consider using multiple mute
a trim for that mix without affecting the Main faders (since I groups, organized by scene. The mute groups allow you to focus
run my Auxes on post). I find this feature to be brilliant. on your active channel faders for your line by line mixing.
Using groups and VCAs (or DCAs) helps me consolidate Often, high channel counts are the result of multiple acts
all inputs in a more organized manner, allowing me to make at festivals. Organization needs to extend to the stage. Label
broad strokes when it comes to the music and vocal balance. everything! Use multiple sub-snakes, and if feasible, swap
With groups, I love processing them to create a certain color multipins for drum risers or other moving elements.
for the overall sound of that group, allowing me to glue the
instruments in that group without having to use too much EQ Dave Natale (FOH): When using one of my usual PM4000 ana-
or compression on the individual channels. log boards, I assign all of the channels directly to the Stereo Mix
Bus – I don’t use audio subgroups, but rather, the eight VCAs.
Scott Mullane (FOH): I try as much as possible to lay out the The PM4000s that I work with have 40 mono and 12 stereo
console with as much of the “money channels” and channels channels for a total of 64 channels in one frame. (I’m not even
that require constant attention on one layer. I achieve this in sure if 64 channels is considered a large amount these days.)
a kind of backwards way, laying out the top layers as I would a However, in the past, I’ve utilized two PM4000s for Fleet-
standard festival patch, which usually leaves one or two layers wood Mac and Motley Crüe, for example. Even in these rare
empty at the bottom of the console. So, I make the bottom situations where the channel count can go as high as 128 over
layer my “money layer.” I do this because I spend so much time the two consoles, I still only use the eight VCAs. The PM4000
on festival patches and smaller band layouts that my brain has the ability to link the Audio Subs, Mute Groups and VCAs
is used to this layout, so I leave the top layers in this type of between both of the consoles so that either can be designated
configuration. I’m used to it and I don’t have to think about it. as the master, controlling it and the other console.
I then decide on how I group the inputs and prioritize the When I’m absolutely forced to use a digital console, I arrange
DCAs to a top control layer on one center bank of faders. Drums, all of the input channels in a way that makes sense to me on the
Guitars, Keyboards, DIs, Strings, Choir, Vocals, Background layers, but since I find mixing on 24 faders a completely silly and
Vocals, Media, FX, etc. These DCAs are my main control for the foreign way to mix, I rely on the 12 DCAs so that I don’t have
mix and DCA spill becomes the fastest way to access anything to waste too much time and watch too many cues go roaring
on the board no matter where it is. I’m not a huge user of sub- past while I’m looking around for things. Over the past 10-plus
groups, with usually only three to four in my layout. However, years, I’ve seen far too many engineers blow what could be an
I assess if any of the instrument groups will be best served with actual audio mixing cue(s) because they’re searching for an
group processing such as EQ and compression. Instrument input channel or fooling around pretending that they can hear
groups like strings, choirs etc. are served well sometimes with the difference that they think that their plugins are making.
a simple group EQ. I know that everyone has their own opinions, but I still
So, console layout, DCA assignment and group assignment maintain that I can move around faster doing a mix on analog
in that order are my priority when planning and programming consoles than anyone else would be changing layers on a digital
my console. DCA spill is my best friend when mixing. The mix console. I’d also like to point out that I do whatever I can in
itself, like any mix requires the same attention to space and order to keep the channel count down. I’ve had the good fortune
musicality, leaving space for the key instrument which are still of not having been subjected to mixing a band that needs Pro
likely to be vocals. Tools (for one reason or the another…). LSI
C
hiseling stone is an arduous task.
Author Ken Follett’s novel “The
Pillars of the Earth” describes
how generations of stone masons would
painstakingly undertake the building of a
cathedral over a century or more. Carving
stone takes patience. Repeated strikes
with a hammer and chisel slowly develop my PADI scuba-diving classes was the Our “mantra” was providing products
fissures in the rock which eventually turn way currents work on the shoreline. The that were better at transmitting sound
to cracks and ultimately, a small piece of instructor started by saying there is no without artifact while also being better
granite falls off. An experienced stone such thing as a rip tide. The ocean is made at eliminating noise.
mason looks at the stone before begin- up of currents, and more often than not, The packages went out in February and
ning, carefully examining the direction people drown due to exhaustion as they then we waited… and waited. And then
of the veins before selecting a tangent. attempt to overpower the ocean’s current, waited some more. Nothing happened.
Building a business is very much the not their inability to swim. People hate change. Just because a bro-
same. Rarely do we see instant success. I recall being on a beach in Barbados chure shows up in the mail is usually not
For many entrepreneurs the wait is like when my daughter Darryn – a very good enough of a reason to change the “speed
watching paint dry. Unless one has the swimmer – got caught in the current. She dial” on the phone.
wherewithal to stay the course, one will was panicking as the current was pulling
all too often give up. her out to the ocean along a jetty. No mat- One can’t count on
It takes a lot of hard work to get good ter how hard she swam, she could not fight
at anything. Malcolm Gladwell wrote a the power of the ocean. I swam out, had disruption to open
book on the subject, noting that luminar- her follow me around the jetty where cur- doors. Sometimes, it’s
ies such as Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates rent was swirling back towards the shore.
and ice hockey great Wayne Gretzky spent We both suffered some cuts and scrapes more about staying the
10,000 hours honing their craft until they as we climbed out on the other side of the
stone jetty but lived to tell the tale.
course
achieved a degree of success. In my case, I
started in music retail where I learned to But then all of a sudden, orders began
sell, moved to pro audio where I learned SHIFTING FORCES to come in. Sales went from about $5,000
to design, then to distribution where I In early 1992, we launched Cabletek, the a month to $15,000 pretty much over-
learned to plan, travelled across Canada forerunner to Radial Engineering. The night and continued to blossom from
countless times to get to know my cus- first thing I did was set out a market- there. What happened? In our case,
tomers, and graduated into manufacturing ing plan that included putting together affordable digital recording systems such
while expanding travel throughout the a catalog of products, a detailed price as the Alesis ADAT and Tascam DA88
United States and eventually the globe. list and whatever marketing materials began to appear and noise that in the past
One of the most important things we could muster up. I then put together that may have been masked by tape-hiss
I learned is that just as you can’t fight a list of clients and mailed out several was now apparent. Mogami cable became
mother nature, the market is always right. hundred packages to music stores, sound the go-to brand for the most demanding
The most valuable teaching I derived from companies and large recording studios. recording studios.
A
s a non-touring local audio freelancer in Orlando, Figure 1
my typical gig is nothing like touring with a band. I
do corporate events almost exclusively, which can be The mains and delays are passive loudspeakers on stands. The
equally demanding if not more so. In this article, I’m detailing aux sends do not have delay function, so aux outputs 1 and 2
my setup and signal path with the acknowledgement that there are routed through a matrix in order to delay the output by the
are as many different ways of doing things are there are those appropriate amount. In the latest firmware update, Yamaha has
of us doing them. My purpose is to provide some ideas based added four matrix outputs with delay capability, and I find four
on what works for me. to be a sufficient number of delay outputs for corporate events
The particular event that I’m presenting here is a gathering like this one. In fact, for this event, I used only two of the four.
of about 800 in attendance, and I’m deploying my personal
gear, as opposed to being called in to operate equipment that FURTHER FACTORS
belongs to the in-house provider, a rental house, or an AV If you’re new to all this and wondering what delays are, they
company. My mixer is a Yamaha TF5, and you can see my I/O are additional loudspeakers that cover audience areas a signif-
setup on the offline editor (Figure 1) or the photo of my icant distance from the mains. The audio signal sent to these
board (Figure 2). loudspeakers is delayed by a certain number of milliseconds
so it’s in sync with the arrival of sound from the mains, thus
My Input List: avoiding something that sounds like a really distracting echo.
Channels 1 – 4: Wireless handheld microphones The delay time is determined by the distance of the delay
Channels 5 & 6: Wireless lavalier microphones speakers from the mains, figuring the speed of sound at roughly
Channels 7 & 8 (linked*): Video playback laptop, R&L 1,130 feet per second. It’s affected by temperature, so I use
Channels 9 & 10 (linked*): Music playback laptop, R&L 1,130 ft/s as a starting point and adjust as necessary. What
Channels 11 & 12 (linked*): Live band that comes with self-con- will really bake your noodle is that the temperature changes
tained audio (more about this later) as the room fills with people!
Channel 13: VOG (“Voice of God,” or an announcer).
Channels 14, 15, and 16: Unassigned but available if needed.
*On my TF5, as on most (if not all) digital boards, it’s possible
to link two adjacent input channels, so that when either fader
is adjusted, the linked fader moves with it. Also, any adjust-
ments in equalization and other functions are duplicated on
the linked channel.
My Output List:
Mains
Aux 1 & 2 (not linked): Delays
Aux 3: Front fills
Aux 4: A pair of active subwoofers, positioned at the mains
Aux 5: Foldback (a pair of passive stage floor wedge monitors)
Aux 6: A Hotspot-style personal monitor at FOH
Aux 7: Record send Figure 2
www.YamahaCA.com
nexo-sa.com
SPOTLIGHT
3-WAY ACTIVE LINE ARRAY SYSTEM MODULAR SLOT FOR RDNET CARD
(DEFAULT) OR DANTE CARD (OPTIONAL)
3200W RMS DIGIPRO G4 AMP TECHNOLOGY
IPOS INTELLIGENT POWER-ON SEQUENCE
FULL RANGE SMPS WITH PFC
NFC™ + FRONT LED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM
EXCLUSIVELY DESIGNED WAVEGUIDE FOR
MAXIMUM HF DIRECTIVITY CONTROL ONLY 54.4 KG PER WOODEN MODULE
ADVANCED DSP FEATURING LINEAR ACOUSTIC COMPATIBILITY WITH VIO L210
PHASE FIR FILTERS
L
ike many live audio engineers, I
dislike wearing comm headsets.
It’s not the headset’s fault – it’s
just that I’m supposed to be listening
to the mix, so having my ears covered
presents a fundamental issue.
That said, there are a number of events
for which I do have to wear headsets –
corporate work, for one, and shows on
which I’m functioning as a playback tech
and need to call cues for the other mem- The new Bose SoundComm B40 headset.
bers of the crew.
On these events, I’m treated to the unique kind of annoy- The SoundComm B40 is sold in three variants: single-earcup
ance only understood by those who must wear headsets and with left earcup and mic, single-earcup with right earcup and
eyeglasses at the same time. Since I’m usually not excited about mic, and a dual-earcup version with a side-swappable mic,
being on comms to begin with, I can only hope that the head- which is the version that I tested for this review. Side-swappable
sets in use will minimize the discomfort as much as possible. means that if you prefer to have the mic on the opposite side,
the mic boom assembly can be detached and moved to the other
BIG IMPROVEMENT earcup in a few minutes. It’s also available in 4-pin XLRF and
Against this backdrop, Bose recently sent along two of its new 5-pin XLRM variants, making it compatible with many popular
SoundComm B40 headsets for me and other crew members intercom systems that provide monaural or binaural audio.
to check out. And I’ll start there: this thing is seriously com- The headset is also designed to withstand diverse environ-
fortable, “one giant leap” compared to the headsets owned mental conditions. Lightweight materials, intelligent weight
by the venue we were working in. We utilized it with Radio distribution and low clamping force are intended to provide
Active Designs UV-1G beltpacks (which I’ll be reviewing in long-term comfort and years of use.
the next issue).
Equipped with proprietary acoustic noise cancellation tech- GOING A LONG WAY
nology, the SoundComm B40 is designed to reduce crowd noise The SoundComm B40’s active noise cancellation feature is
and distractions while providing very high audio clarity. It’s strikingly effective, activated via a switch on the battery pack
equipped with a weather-resistant dynamic noise cancellation that is placed inline with the cable, near where it connects to the
microphone intended to optimize intelligibility and provide comms back. The pack itself takes two AA batteries and comes
far-field noise rejection to help enable clear communication with a few mounting options for either beltclip use or attaching
within a live event production team. it directly to the side of your existing comms back. (No current
The mic’s frequency response exhibits a logical, gentle low-fre- is drawn from the batteries when active noise cancellation is
quency rolloff and presence peak, which is ideal for speech switched off. The battery life is a stated 48 hours from a new
intelligibility. While my ears took some time to adjust to the set of batteries, but if they die during your show, your comms
rolloff, I thought it was a functional choice in that it significantly will continue to work just fine.)
reduced breath noise and wind rumble, which are usual sources Our stage manager, who needed a wide and free range of
of annoyance with a bunch of folks on the same comms network. movement, preferred not to have the extra pack hanging off
DIGITAL
EDITION
O
ne of my first forays into audio test and mea-
surement was reading Douglas Self’s book
“Audio Power Amplifier Design.” The size
and weight of a small phonebook, it’s an incredible
journey through the minutia of amplifier design, with
The APx500 Flex in bench mode, showing a few of the multiple real-time
an emphasis on reducing total harmonic distortion
meters and analyzers available for testing.
(THD). THD+N plots generated by an Audio Precision
analyzer adorn almost every page. was able to get the analyzer working just fine with my Roland
Based in Beaverton, OR, Audio Precision is an undisputed Octacapture interface with little fuss.
industry leader in high-precision, laboratory-grade audio analyz- Upon launching the analyzer software for the first time, the
ers. The company’s APx series of hardware-based analyzers offer first order of business is to calibrate the interface, the process for
extremely low distortion, along with noise floors that approach which is outlined in “Audio Precision Tech Note #TN139,” available
the theoretical minimum, and full-featured software allows users from AP.com. The document walks through the steps necessary to
to configure and perform many different tests. As you might calibrate the digital input and output levels (in dBFS) to analog
imagine, the extremely high-spec hardware means the cost of voltage levels (dBu), so that meaningful statements can be made
an AP system can be out of reach for many potential users. about the test results and signal levels in absolute terms. This doc-
ument also outlines some of the pros and cons of using an audio
UP & RUNNING interface in place of a dedicated, purpose-built hardware analyzer.
Enter the APx500 Flex audio analyzer, a software-based product
offering the same powerful test routine capability as its breth- DUAL MODES
ren, designed to be used with any ASIO-capable audio interface Once the calibration was complete, I was able to dive into the
that the user desires. (ASIO, or Audio Stream Input/Output, software’s main interface, which sports two modes: Sequence
is a computer sound card driver protocol that allows Windows Mode and the optional Bench Mode that’s basically a collection of
software applications to connect directly to audio hardware, different test and measurement tools including a signal generator,
reducing latency and allowing the software to access multiple signal scope, FFT spectrum analyzer, RMS level meters, THD+N
inputs and outputs simultaneously.) Essentially, users purchase and frequency readouts, and more. It’s where a user would head
a software license assigned to a USB key – APx500 Flex
Key – that allows them to use the flagship APx500 audio
test software without Audio Precision hardware. (More
on software options in a minute.)
Although the bring-your-own-interface approach
obviously doesn’t afford all the benefits associated with
Audio Precision’s hardware, it does bring the analysis
software’s full feature-set to a much wider level of
accessibility. If you’re experienced with acoustic test
and measurement, you know that the noise and dis-
tortion specs of a professional-level audio interface can
be completely adequate for a lot of the tests that we
seek to carry out on the various devices in our signal
chain. The AP website offers Setup Guides for several Sequence mode, showing the Unwrapped Phase Spectrum of a transfer
popular interface options from RME and Lynx, and I function measurement.
NEWSLETTERS
is $3,000 (U.S.) for a two-channel configu-
ration including sequence mode and mea-
surement Flex Pack 1, which offers tests
for Level & Gain, THD+N, Loudspeaker
Production Test (including rub & buzz),
THAT ARE TIMELY...
stepped frequency sweep tests, pass/
fail functionality, and signal acquisition
FOCUSED...DIRECT
measurements The user can customize
the analyzer’s capabilities by choosing
additional IO (up to eight channels),
Bench Mode, additional Flex Packs con-
SUBSCRIBE
taining a diverse selection of additional Enter your email address at prosoundweb.com/subscribe
measurements, or even add individual
measurements “a la carte” as needed. In
TRANSLATED TO REALITY
Part 2 on smart loudspeaker acoustic
measurements.
by Joe Begin is positioned 40 centimeters (15.7 inches)
from the edge of the table, with a mouth
Editor’s Note: In the previous issue (“Appli- simulator located at the table edge and 30
cation Note,” LSI March 2020), the author cm (11.8 inches) above the table surface.
provided an overview of smart loudspeakers In Figure 1, the mouth simulator is 30
(“smart speakers”) and the key aspects in centimeters above the top of the smart Figure 1: Setup for smart speaker input
testing their audio performance. This time he speaker rather than the table surface. path test.
focuses on the practical aspects of end-to-end This is because a smart speaker’s micro-
testing these devices. phone array is typically located on the phrases and sentences. The input path of
top surface of the device, as opposed a smart speaker will likely have nonlinear
W
hen conducting audio tests, to speakerphones, which typically have processing such as automatic gain control
it’s generally a good practice to microphone(s) located at the base of the (AGC). As such, it might be prudent to
adhere to industry standards or device. repeat the test at a few different levels.
to at least use them as a guideline. Smart Like any loudspeaker, a mouth sim- For speakerphone loudness ratings, IEEE
speakers are so new that there are cur- ulator does not have a flat frequency 1329 specifies tests at levels from 79 to 99
rently no industry standards for testing response; typical mouth simulators have dBSPL at the MRP in 5 dB steps.
them. However, in terms of form and func- a deviation from flatness of ±10 dB or In the analysis phase, the signal
tion, a smart speaker is similar to a speak- more within the frequency range from acquired by the smart speaker and
erphone and there are several national and 100 Hz to 8 kHz (the frequency range of uploaded to the IVA will be compared
international standards which focus on male speech). For a mouth simulator to to the stimulus signal. This will require
speakerphone tests such as IEEE 1329.[1] faithfully reproduce an audio signal such that the two signals have the same audio
These standards can be used as a guideline as speech, it must be equalized to have a sample rate. For the input path, smart
when testing smart speakers. flat response within this range. speakers typically use a sample rate of 16
Measurements to equalize (and calibrate) kHz, which enables a bandwidth of just
INPUT PATH a mouth simulator are typically made with less than 8 kHz. This sample rate is used
As previously noted, for the primary a 1/4-inch measurement microphone at a in “wideband speech” applications such as
input path of a smart speaker, a speech point called the Mouth Reference Point VOIP and newer versions of the Bluetooth
(or speech-like) signal is sensed with the (MRP), centered on the mouth opening Handsfree profile (HFP). It’s referred to as
device’s microphone array, digitized and and located 25 millimeters (1 inch) in front wideband, because it has twice the band-
uploaded to the Intelligent Virtual Assistant of the lip ring. To equalize a mouth simu- width of ordinary digital telephone lines
(IVA) for signal processing and command lator, its frequency response is measured, (just under 4 kHz), which enables clearer,
interpretation. An audio test of this path then inverted and applied as an EQ curve more natural sounding speech.
involves “tricking” the device to acquire and (a feature built into the audio analyzer). If the test stimulus does not already
save a test signal, retrieving the recorded This results in the mouth simulator having exist, it makes sense to create it at the
signal from the back-end server, and com- a frequency response magnitude that is flat same sample rate (typically 16 kHz) as
paring it to the original test signal. within a specified tolerance (e.g., ±0.5 dB the DUT output. Audio analyzers can
Figure 1 shows a test setup which is from 100 Hz to 8 kHz). usually create a stimulus signal at a
based on IEEE Standard 1329. The standard The test signal should also be presented variety of sample rates. If the stimulus
specifies that speakerphones be tested on at a known level. IEEE 1329 specifies a signal already exists, but is at a different
a tabletop approximately 1 meter wide x 1 level of -5 dBPa (89 dBSPL) at the MRP, sample rate, at some point it will need to
meter long (39 x 39 inches) in an anechoic which corresponds to a normal or nom- be converted to the sample rate of the
chamber or in a simulated free field (using inal level of speech. If a speech signal is DUT output. This is easily accomplished
time-selective measurement techniques). used, the level should be set using the with an audio waveform editing software
For the send direction (the equivalent of “active speech level” – a level metric which package like Audacity [2] (open source)
the smart speaker input path), the device ignores the silent periods between speech or GoldWave [3] (inexpensive).
GETTING IT DONE
A roundup
One of the CODA N-RAY arrays flown by AMBION at the most Howard Heckers with his front of house kit, which includes a
recent edition of The Kulturzelt festival. DiGiGrid IOS interface, for Kings of Floyd.
ADVANTAGES OF SCALE
Compact line array
one subwoofer, some of them designed to fit seamlessly within
a flown array structure.
of recent models.
line array modules of various sizes that work together seamlessly.
In addition, some sound companies use smaller systems as front
fills, down fills, and delays in conjunction with larger main arrays.
by Live Sound Staff Flexibility with rigging continues to evolve, providing added
array structure options. Compact systems also present a popular
P
opular convention says that bigger is better, but for approach of ground-stacking as mains capable of satisfying
many gigs, compact line arrays are actually a more the requirements of certain applications without the need for
suitable fit. A smaller system offers many advantages, rigging infrastructure. Some of the models in our roundup are
including reduced effect on sightlines, reduced weight on rigging also designed so that cabinets can be stand- and pole-mounted,
points, and a reduced impact on budgets, all while still delivering joined by ground-based subwoofers.
quality sound reinforcement. In addition, lesser-scaled systems Many compact arrays are available with dedicated amplifica-
take up less room in the shop and less room on the truck. tion and sophisticated DSP packages, either onboard or sepa-
Further, smaller array modules can accommodate larger splay rately rack-mounted. Others are designed to work with a range
angles between modules while maintaining minimal displace- of amplification and processing devices, and some companies
ment between speaker drivers. This can be handy when dealing offer a choice of either approach. A number of models are now
with smaller rooms where array placement options are limited. equipped with proprietary and/or Dante networking capability.
We’ve defined compact line arrays as those having low-fre- With advances in technology and components, many recent
quency drivers measuring 8 inches or smaller. They present a compact line arrays can offer the same – or almost the same –
scalable solution – a single array will provide main coverage to acoustical output as their bigger brothers. A smaller footprint,
a relatively large space, and the addition of more loudspeakers less weight, added flexibility, quality sound and lots of volume
easily expands coverage capabilities. For dynamic full-range at an attractive price point and return on investment. What’s
music presentation, arrays are usually accompanied by at least not to like? Enjoy this look at the latest compact line arrays. LSI
Perfect for live sound and touring, the Firenze-KH7 is an electronic beam steerable,
self-powered straight hang line array with 4 x 12” coaxial drivers with rotatable horns
that can be flown vertically or horizontally. A system of 8 KH7 per side was recently used
for Rome’s Primo Maggio festival which had over 50,000 people in attendance.
REAL WORLD GEAR
Power: Self-powered (class D, 8 chan- Power: Self-powered (class D, 750 + 250 Power: Self-powered (class D), LF - 600
nels), multi-channel DSP watts); DSP onboard watts, HF - 300 watts; DSP
Size: 18.5 (h) x 28.5 (w) x 11.5 (d) inches Size: 11.2 (h) x 33 (w) x 8.3 (d) inches Size: 7.5 (h) x 22.6 (w) x 15 (d) inches
Configuration: 3-way
Configuration: 2-way Configuration: 3-way
LF: 2 x 8-inch Differential Drive neodymi-
um cone drivers Dispersion (h x v): 100 or 70 degrees LF: 2 x 6.5-inch neodymium cone drivers
MF: 4 x 3.5-inch neodymium midrange (changeable) x choice of 5, 10, or 20 degrees
MF: 1 x 4-inch neodymium cone driver
drivers LF: 2 x 8-inch cone drivers
HF: 2 x 2-inch neodymium compression HF: 1 x 1-inch compression driver
HF: 4 x EMB2S compression drivers
drivers Frequency Response: 80 Hz – 20 kHz
Frequency Response: 50 Hz – 19 kHz Frequency Response: 69 Hz – 17 kHz
Dispersion: 110 (h) x 8 (v) degrees
Dispersion: 110 degrees (h), vertical is Power: HF: 100 watts continuous, 400
array dependant watts peak; LF: 450 watts continuous, Rigging: 0 to 12 degrees in 1-degree
Rigging: Selectable splay increments 1,800 watts peak increments
between 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, Power: 10000DP amplification
Rigging: 3-point “quick pin” system,
and 10 degrees recommended (DSP, networking); LF: 400
support for up to 24 modules
Power: Crown Audio I-Tech HD (all mod- watts peak, MF/HF: 240 watts peak
els) & I-Tech 4x3500HD Weight: N/A
Weight: 29.5 pounds
Weight: 65 pounds Size (h x w x d): 11.1 (h) x 31.2 (w) x 18.3 (d)
Size: 11 (h) x 31 (w) x 22.1 (d) inches inches Size: 7.6 (h) x 21.7 (w) x 15.6 (d) inches
M
y mixing technique is largely subtractive in nature (remove things
from the mix that don’t need to be there). If I’m getting a lot of hi-hat
bleed through the other drum mics, I’ll pull the hat fader back. I
also high pass, low pass, and mid-scoop mix elements that aren’t contributing
necessary energy (or contributing too much energy) in those frequency ranges.
Basically, trimming the fat.
Lately I’ve been interested in applying the same concepts to my system
optimization work. This school of thought is inspired largely by the 360-degree
system tuning concept introduced to me by my friend Jim Yakabuski. Here’s my
shot at applying that concept to a set of infills located at the corners of a stage.
Three traces were taken over the coverage of the right side of the PA (near,
mid, far) and their average is shown in Figure 1. (The sub bump is a little high Figure 2
and was reduced by about 6 dB later in the optimization process.)
Down in the first few rows, we’re underneath the main hangs and so out of the HF coverage. Figure 2 provides the response of the
mains in the area that’s intended to be covered by the infill (purple) compared to the previous average trace as a reference (gold). It’s
obvious that the LF coverage is totally sufficient down here, and we really just need the infill to contribute the missing HF information.
Now, let’s go to Figure 3, which depicts the raw response of the infill from the center of its coverage area, again compared
against gold. HF response is exactly where we need it. Let’s roll off the LF so that the fill will combine with the OFFAX LF from
the mains and bring the entire response back closer to the target. In Figure 4, we can see how the purple (mains LF) dovetails
nicely with the yellow (fill HF).
Figure 3 Figure 4
What I didn’t have time to grab is a combined trace to compare to target after time was set. This show was an hour behind due
to rain, and so in those cases I will only stop to measure things that I need to measure in order to adjust a parameter, and the
verification traces get skipped in lieu of a final by-ear check at the end. LSI
Michael Lawrence is an independent front of house engineer and system tech, and he’s also the technical editor of various pro audio
publications. Read more from Michael and reach him at precisionaudioservices.com.