An Efficient One-Pot Strategies For The Synthesis of (1,3) Oxazine Derivatives
An Efficient One-Pot Strategies For The Synthesis of (1,3) Oxazine Derivatives
An Efficient One-Pot Strategies For The Synthesis of (1,3) Oxazine Derivatives
요약. 수용액 속에서 NaHSO4, TBAB (phase transfer catalyst), ionic liquid (IL) (1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium hydrogen sul-
phate [bmim]HSO4)를 사용하여, formalin, β-naphthol, aromatic amines을 반응시켜서 대응하는 2,3-dihydro-2-phenyl-1H-
naphtho-[1,2-e] [1,3] oxazine 유도체를 합성할 수 있는 보다 친환경적이고, 수율이 좋고, 크로마토그래피 분리 방법을 사용하
지 않는 합성 방법을 개발하였다.
주제어: [1,3] Oxazine 유도체, One-pot 전략, Cyclocondensation, Ionic liquid, Grinding
ABSTRACT. Sodium hydrogen sulphate (NaHSO4), n-tetra butyl ammonium bromide (TBAB) as a phase transfer catalyst
(PTC) in water, and 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium hydrogen sulphate [bmim]HSO4 as ionic liquid (IL) has been used as a mild
reaction promoter for the cyclocondensation of formalin, β-naphthol and aromatic amines to afford respective 2,3-dihydro-2-
phenyl-1H-naphtho-[1,2-e] [1,3] oxazine derivatives. The present protocols are greener, high yielding and involved the non-
chromatographic isolation procedure.
Keywords: [1,3] Oxazine derivatives, One-pot strategies, Cyclocondensation, Ionic liquid, Grinding
-437-
438 Suryakant B. Sapkal, Kiran F. Shelke, Bapurao B. Shingate, and Murlidhar S. Shingare
and catalysts.20 Therefore, we would like to perform some evaporator. The solid obtained was crystallized from ethanol
of the safer processes such as, use of ionic liquid, use of to get pure product.
phase transfer catalyst in water and grinding for the preferred Method B. A mixture of formalin (2 mmol), aromatic
reaction. amine (1 mmol), 2-naphthol and PTC (0.5 mmol) was stirred
One of the alternatives for organic solvents under inves- in water (10 mL) at room temperature upto the completion
tigation in organic transformations is an ionic liquid.21 The of reaction as monitored by TLC for appropriate time period.
use of ionic liquids as a solvent as well as catalyst is surpri- After completion of the reaction, further procedure was per-
singly effective because of non-inflammability, high tempera- formed as per method A.
ture tolerance, high solubility, non-volatile nature, negligible Method C. A mixture of formalin (2 mmol), aromatic
vapour pressure, recovery and reusability. In continuation amine (1 mmol), 2-naphthol and NaHSO4 (3 mmol) was
of our work on IL in search of benign methods for the syn- ground by pestle and mortar at room temperature for speci-
thesis of various organic compounds,22 herein, we would fied period of time as mentioned in Table 4. After comple-
like to report for first time, the selective and rapid synthesis tion of reaction, as monitored by TLC, the reaction mixture
of 1,3-oxazine derivatives in the presence of [bmim]HSO4 was poured on cold water. The solid thus obtained was fil-
acidic ionic liquid. On the other side of this method, one tered, dried and crystallized in ethanol to get pure product.
ideal alternative under examination as a greener solvent for
organic reaction is water.23 The use of water as a solvent/ Spectroscopic data of the products
reaction media is often surprisingly effective because of low 2,3-Dihydro-2-m-tolyl-1H-naphtho-[1,2-e][1,3] oxazine
cost, easy availability in abundant quantity, non-inflamm- (4c): IR (KBr, υmax/cm-1) 1029 (sym. C-O-C), 1231 (asym.
ability, non-toxic, ecofriendly, and easy product isolation C-O-C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, δ ppm) 2.20 (q, 3H,
when product is solid. The introduction of PTC to the re- Ar-CH3), 4.90 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2-N-), 5.60 (s, 2H, -O-CH2-N-),
action in water has developed synthetic methodology and 6.70-7.80 (m, 10H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 75 MHz,
made progress in approaching green chemistry. As far as δ ppm) 20.2, 50.1, 79.1, 113.2, 116.1, 117.4, 119.2, 120.5,
we know, PTC is widely used in chemical reaction since it 124.7, 125.8, 126.1, 126.8, 127.9, 129.7, 130.4, 147.2, 148.1,
offers high yield with reduced cycle time, reduced or non 149.2, 150.4; MS: m/z 276.2 (m+1); Elemental analysis:
added solvent, mild reaction condition, enhanced environ- C19H17NO Calcd.: C: 82.88%; H: 6.22%; N: 5.09%; Found:
mental performance and sometime better selectivity.24 C: 82.71%, H: 6.29%, N: 5.06%.
Furthermore, the solid state reaction by grinding has many 2,3-Dihydro-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1H-naphtho[1,2-e]
advantages such as reduced pollution, low costs, simplicity [1,3] oxazine (4j): IR (KBr, υmax/cm-1) 1029 (sym. C-O-C),
in process, handling and there is no need for the use of 1211 (asym. C-O-C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, δ ppm)
harmful organic solvents. These factors are beneficial to 3.54 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 4.70 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2-N-), 5.50 (s, 2H,
industry as well as to environment. Therefore solid state re- -O-CH2-N-), 6.11-7.53 (m, 10H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (DMSO-
actions or solvent free reactions are one of the most impor- d6, 75 MHz, δ ppm) 49.1, 53.4, 79.2, 112.1, 114.5, 115.8,
tant synthesis techniques in green chemistry. Various solvent 117.3, 118.2, 120.9, 124.5, 125.6, 125.9, 126.5, 127.5, 130.3,
free reactions were found to occur by hand grinding in 133.2, 146.7, 148.9, 151.1; MS: m/z 292.2 (m+1); Elemental
mortar and pestle.25 analysis: C19H17NO2 Calcd.: C: 78.33%; H: 5.88%; N: 4.81%;
Found: C: 78.21%, H: 5.78%, N: 4.90%.
EXPERIMENTAL 2,3-Dihydro-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-naphtho[1,2-e]
[1,3] oxazine (4k): IR (KBr, υmax/cm-1) 1019 (sym. C-O-C),
General procedures for compounds 4(a-n) 1228 (asym. C-O-C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, δ ppm)
Method A. A mixture of formalin (2 mmol), aromatic 3.62 (s, 3H, -OCH3), 4.87 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2-N-), 5.40 (s, 2H,
amine (1 mmol), 2-naphthol (1 mmol) in [bmim]HSO4 (5 -O-CH2-N-), 6.77-7.82 (m, 10H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (DMSO-
mol %) at 60 oC was stirred for specified time period as d6, 75 MHz, δ ppm) 48.2, 52.2, 80.1, 111.2, 113.2, 115.6,
shown in Table 4. The progress of reaction was monitored 117.4, 119.5, 121.1, 124.2, 125.7, 125.9, 126.8, 127.2, 130.1,
on TLC. Upon completion of reaction, the reaction mixture 132.3, 146.8, 148.6, 150.1; MS: m/z 292.2 (m+1); Elemental
was extracted with ethyl acetate (2 × 20 mL) leaving behind analysis: C19H17NO2 Calcd.: C: 78.33%; H: 5.88%; N: 4.81%;
[bmim]HSO4, organic layer was washed by brine (2 × 10 mL) Found: C: 78.45%, H: 5.90%, N: 4.72%.
solution and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The 2-(2-ethoxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[1,2-e][1,3]
organic layer was evaporated under reduced pressure in Rota oxazine (4l): IR (KBr, υmax/cm-1) 1021 (sym. C-O-C), 1234
(asym. C-O-C); 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz, δ ppm) 1.29 Table 1. Screening of IL for the synthesis of [1,3] oxazines
(t, 3H, J = 14 Hz, -O-CH2-CH3), 3.96 (q, 2H, J = 14 Hz,
-O-CH2-CH3), 4.61 (s, 2H, Ar-CH2-N-), 5.40 (s, 2H, -O- NH2
OH
CH2-N-), 6.17-7.44 (m, 10H, Ar-H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, + HCHO+ IL, 60 oC N
O
75 MHz, δ ppm) 13.9, 48.8, 64.7, 81.5, 111.8, 114.7, 115.8,
117.5, 118.5, 121.2, 122.2, 124.5, 125.4, 125.7, 126.2, 127.4,
128.8, 133.2, 146.1, 149.3; MS: m/z 306.2 (m+1); Elemental 1 2 3 (a-n) 4 (a-n)
Table 2. Selection of PTC for the synthesis of [1,3] oxazines. Table 3. Screening of suitable catalyst for synthesis of [1,3] oxazines.
NH2 NH2
OH OH
PTC/H2O, RT N N
+ HCHO + Catalyst, Grinding
+ HCHO +
O O
Entry PTC Time (h) Yield (%)a Entry Catalyst Time (min) Yield (%)a
1 TDTMAB 12 60 1 EPZ-10 35 45
2 CPC 15 45 2 EPZG 40 30
3 TEAB 11 70 3 SnCl2․H2O 30 65
4 SDS 17 40 4 FeCl3 30 60
5 TBAB 5 92 5 NaHSO4 7 89
a a
Isolated yield Isolated yield
showed that the reaction require longer time duration and the non-ammonium ion PTC like, SDS having amphiphilic
gave low yield 60% (Table 2, entry 1). properties, but we found that the time required was compara-
Further attempts were made by using other PTCs like tively very high 17 hr regarding product yield 40% (Table 2,
CPC, TEAB in water but we did not get appreciable % yield entry 4). In due course to prepare more derivatives with
within shorter reaction time (Table 2, entry 2, 3). Providen- aromatic amines having different substituents at various po-
tially, the target compound could be obtained by using TBAB sitions were reacted smoothly giving excellent product yield
due to the fact, which facilitates the migration of the reactants when subjected with TBAB in water at room temperature
in heterogeneous system from one phase into another phase as shown in Table 4.
effectively. Hence by using TBAB the reaction was com- Finally, attempts were made using grinding approach
pleted successfully within 5 hr that affords respective yield which is less hazardous to human health and environment.
92% (Table 2, entry 5). Even though, we have screened for In order to select an appropriate catalyst for the synthesis of
NH2
OH N
+ HCHO + R O
1 2 3 (a-n) 4 (a-n)
o
IL/60 C (Method A) PTC/H2O (Method B) Grinding (Method C)
Entry R a a a
M. P. (oC)
Time (min) Yield (%) Time (h) Yield (%) Time (min) Yield (%)
4a H 30 90 5 92 7 89 49-51b
4b 2-Me 35 92 4.5 92 7 90 56-58b
4c 3-Me 32 90 5 87 7 85 70-72
4d 4-Me 30 89 5 90 8 87 88-90b
b
4e 2-NO2 30 90 6 91 7 89 110-112
4f 3-NO2 32 91 5 90 7 90 129-131b
b
4g 4-NO2 29 89 5 89 7 87 165-167
4h 4-Br 29 92 4.5 90 6 90 115-117b
4i 2,4,6-tri Br 40 87 6 85 8 89 96-98b
4j 3-OMe 30 93 4 93 7 91 66-68
4k 4-OMe 35 91 4.5 88 6 87 78-80
4l 2-OEt 29 89 5 90 8 89 100-102
4m 4-OEt 30 90 5 91 7 90 69-71
4n 4-F 29 91 4.5 92 6 96 135-137
a b 1
Isolated yield. Reported in reference No. 18, other compounds are characterized with the help of Spectroscopic analysis (IR, H NMR, MS and
Elemental analysis).
1,3-oxazine by simply grinding method in mortar and pestle Commun. 2008, 38, 4125.
that provides an adequate energy for reaction (Table 3). We 6. (a) Zhang, P.; Terefenko, E. A.; Fensome, A.; Wrobel, J.; Win-
have screened an acidic clays such as, EPZ-10 and EPZG neker, R.; Zhang, Z. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1313.
(b) Kurz, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 3091. (c) Adib, M.; Sheibani,
for the preferred reaction, it was observed that the reaction E.; Mostofi, M.; Ghanbary, K.; Bijanzadeh, H. R. Tetrahedron
mass became semi-solid and remained for a long time; the 2006, 62, 3435.
reaction time was very high and product yield was very low 7. Zanatta, N.; Squizani, A. M. C.; Fantinel, L.; Nachtigall, F. M.;
(Table 3, entries 1, 2). Borchhardt, D. M.; Bonakorso, H. G.; Martins, A. M. P. J. Braz.
In addition, starting materials were subjected with Lewis Chem. Soc. 2005, 16, 1255.
acids such as, SnCl2 and FeCl3 as compared to acidic clays; 8. (a) Joyce, J. N.; Presgranes, S.; Renish, L.; Borwege, S.; Osred-
kar, D. H.; Replogle, M.; PazSoldan, M.; Millan, M. J. Exp.
these gives more yield (Table 3, entries 3, 4). Moreover,
Neurol. 2003, 184, 393. (b) Kerdesky, F. A. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
when we used acidic salt NaHSO4 amazingly we observed 2005, 46, 1711.
that, within five min the reaction mixture became semi-solid; 9. (a) Cimarelli, C.; Mazzanti, A.; Palmieri, G.; Volpini, E. J. Org.
we continued grinding process up to complete conversion Chem. 2001, 66, 4759. (b) Istvan, S.; Diana, T.; Andreas, K.;
of reactants into product as showed by TLC. The reaction Matthias, H.; Eirich, K.; Fulop, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
time required was very less 7 min and product yield was 4670.
10. (a) Szatmari, I.; Martinek, T. A.; Lazar, L.; Fulop, F. Eur. J.
very high 89% as shown in (Table 3, entry 5).
Org. Chem. 2004, 2231. (b) Zuhal, T.; Emel, P.; Adem, K. Mole-
With optimized reaction conditions in hand, we explored cules 2007, 12, 345.
the scope and generality of the methodologies with the 11. Sapkal, S. B.; Shelke, K. F.; Kategaonkar, A. H.; Shingate, B.
aromatic amines having electron donating as well as elect- B.; Shingare, M. S. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2009, 2, 57.
ron withdrawing substituents at different positions reacted 12. Lee, J.; Lee, K.; Kim, H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1996, 17, 115.
smoothly providing excellent yields within shorter reaction 13. Tovar, F.; Ochoa, G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 965.
time as shown in Table 4. 14. Kang, J. E.; Kim, H. B.; Lee, J. W.; Shin, S. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3537.
15. Palacios, F.; Herran, E.; Rubiales, G.; Ezpeleta, M. J. J. Org.
CONCLUSION Chem. 2002, 67, 2131.
16. Murai, T.; Sano, H.; Kawai, H.; Aso, H.; Shibahara, F. J. Org.
In conclusion, we have described simple, efficient and Chem. 2005, 70, 8148.
one-pot multicomponent synthesis of some new 2,3-dihydro- 17. Tatti, M. R.; Mamaghani, M.; Mahmoodi, N. O.; Loghmanifar,
A. Trans C:Chem. Chem. Eng. 2009, 16, 17.
2-phenyl-1H-naphtho-[1,2-e][1,3] oxazine derivatives from
18. (a) Burke, W. J.; Murdoc, K. C.; Ec, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954,
cyclocondensation of formalin, aromatic amines and 2-naph- 76, 1677. (b) Agag, J. J. Appl. Poly. Sci. 2006, 100, 3769.
thol under conventional heating in acidic ionic liquid [bmim] 19. (a) Domling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3168.
HSO4, at room temperature stirring in water in the presence (b) Nunes, E.; Junior, S. Res. J. Chem. Environ. 2007, 11, 90.
of TBAB as a phase transfer catalyst and hand grinding 20. Anastas, P.; Eghbali, N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 301.
with NaHSO4. The synthetic utility of the methodologies 21. (a) Chen, J.; Su, W.; Wu, H.; Liu, M.; Jin, C. Green Chem.
demonstrated in this work, whilst contributing the part of 2007, 9, 972. (b) Singh, P.; Katyal, A.; Kalra, R.; Chandra, R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 727. (c) Saha, D.; Saha, A.; Ranu,
green and clean chemistry to sustain the human health and
B. C. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 733. (d) Kumar, A.; Rao, M. S.;
environment unaffected. The remarkable advantages offered Khungar, A. B. Can. J. Chem. 2009, 87, 714. (e) Ramesh, D.;
by the methods presented are use of safer catalysts, use of Reddy, T. S.; Narasimhulu, M.; Rajaram, S.; Suryakiran, N.;
ecofriendly solvents, mild reaction conditions, simplicity of Mahesh, K. C.; Venkateswarlu, Y. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 586.
the reaction procedure and high yielding strategies. (f) Niknam, K.; Damya, M. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2009, 56, 659.
(g) Muthukrishnan, M.; Basavanag, U. M. V.; Puranik, V. G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2643. (h) Khurana, J. M.; Magoo,
REFERENCES D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 7300.
22. (a) Sapkal, S. B.; Shelke, K. F.; Madje, B. R.; Shingate, B. B.;
1. Meyers, A. I.; Smith, E. M. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 4289. Shingare, M. S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 2887. (b)
2. Mayers, A. I.; Malone, G. R. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 618. Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.; Shitole, N. V.; Shingate, B. B.;
3. Shing, O. V.; Han, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 2345. Shingare, M. S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 2883. (c)
4. Tomasulo, M.; Sortino, S.; Raymo, F. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.; Shitole, N. V.; Shingate, B. B.;
1109. Shingare, M. S. Org. Commun. 2009, 2, 72. (d) Shelke, K. F.;
5. (a) Vladmir, A. A.; Kiril, E. M.; Charles, E. M.; Boris, A. K.; Madje, B. R.; Sapkal, S. B.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M. S.
Olga, N. K.; Viktor, F. Z.; Dilyara, N. S.; Alexey, B. D. Synlett Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2009, 2, 3.
2007, 488. (b) Mehdi, G.; Abolfazl, O.; Saeed, R. M. Synth. 23. (a) Li, C. J.; Chen, L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 68. (b) Ku-
maravel, K.; Vasuki, G. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1954. (c) Gu, Y.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M. S. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2010, 8,
DeSousa, R.; Frapper, G.; Bachmann, C.; Barrault, J.; Jerome, 12. (d) Pesyan, N. N.; Khalafy, J.; Malekpoor, Z. J. Chin. Chem.
F. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1968. (d) Akbari, J.; Hedari, A.; Soc. 2009, 56, 1018. (e) Wang, G. W.; Gao, J. Org. Lett. 2009,
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4236. 11, 2385. (f) Mogilaiah, K.; Vidya, K.; Swamy, T. K. Ind. J.
24. (a) Zha, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Z. Green Chem. 2009, 48B, 599.
Chem. 2002, 4, 578. (b) Wu, J.; Wang, F.; Ma, Y.; Cui, X.; Cun, 26. (a) Sapkal, S. B.; Shelke, K. F.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M.
L.; Zhu, J.; Deng, J.; Yu, B. Chem. Commun. 2006, 16, 1766. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1754. (b) Sapkal, S. B.; Shelke,
(c) Beini, H. Z.; Kashan, E. M. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 1987. K. F.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M. S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.
(d) Khurana, J. M.; Kumar, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4125. 2010, 31, 351. (c) Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.; Sonar, S. S.;
25. (a) Tanaka, K.; Toda, F. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1025. (b) Madje, Madje, B. R.; Shingate, B. B.; Shingare, M. S. Bull. Korean
B. R.; Shindalkar, S. S.; Ware, M. N.; Shingare, M. S. Arkivoc Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 1057. (d) Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.;
2005, xiv, 82. (c) Shelke, K. F.; Sapkal, S. B.; Niralwad, K. S.; Shingare, M. S. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2009, 20, 283.