Software Engineering

Dr.Khubaib Amjad Alam,

Tahir Farooq
 Software Engineering Phases

1. Vision – focus on why

2. Definition – focus on what
3. Development – focus on how ( how we can achieve this technically, design,
code)
4. Maintenance – focus on change

Vision Definition Development Maintenance

Detail Requirements Design, code

Embracing Change

▪ In software projects one thing that is constant:

What is Software Process?
▪ “A software process is a set of related activities that leads to
the production of a software product.”
Software Processes Fundamentals Activities

Software Specification:
The functionality of the software and constraints on its operation
must be defined

Software Design and Implementation:

The software to meet the specification must be produced
Software Processes Fundamentals Activities

Software Validation:
The software must be validated to ensure that it does what the
customer wants

Software Evolution:
The software must evolve to meet changing customer needs
Software Process Models
▪ A software process model is a simplified representation of a
software process
▪ Each process model represents a process from a particular
perspective
▪ Provides only partial information
about that process
Process Model

▪ Defines a distinct set of activities, actions, tasks, milestones, and

work products that are required to engineer high-quality software

▪ The activities may be linear, incremental, or evolutionary

8
The Waterfall Model
▪ The first published model of the
software development process (Royce,
1970)

▪ Because of the cascade from one phase to

another, this model is known as the ‘Waterfall
Model’

▪ Plan and schedule all of the process

activities before starting work on them
Waterfall Model (Diagram)

Communication
Project initiation
Requirements
gathering
Planning
Estimating
Scheduling
Tracking Modeling
Analysis
Design Construction
Code
Test Deployment
Delivery
Support
Feedback
11
 Waterfall model problems

Inflexible partitioning of the project into distinct stages makes it

difficult to respond to changing customer requirements.
▪ Therefore, this model is only appropriate when the requirements are well-
understood and changes will be fairly limited during the design process.
▪ Few business systems have stable requirements.

The waterfall model is mostly used for large system engineering

projects where a system is developed at several sites.
▪ In those circumstances, the plan-driven nature of the waterfall model helps
coordinate the work.
The Waterfall Model
Requirements
Finish each phase
before continue to next
System Design
Why is the waterfall model
Program Design so criticized?
Which are the problems? Can
Implementation it be useful sometimes?
Integration
Testing

System Testing
Milestone and
Acceptance
deliverable at Test
each step. (Artifacts
Maintenance
such as Design
document, Requirement
Specification. etc.)
The Waterfall Model - Pros
▪ Simple, manageable and easy to understand
▪ Fits to common project management practices (milestones,
deliverables etc.)

▪ Focus on requirements and design at beginning, save money and time

at the end

▪ Can be suitable for short projects (some weeks)

▪ Can be suitable for "stable" projects, where requirements do not
change
▪ Focus on documents, saves knowledge which can be reused by
other people.
▪ Widely used, e.g. US Department of Defense
▪ Can be suitable for fixed-price contracts
Problem?
The Waterfall Model - Cons

▪ Software requirements change, hard to sign-off on a SRS.

▪ Early commitment. Changes at the end, large impact.
▪ Feedback is needed to understand a phase. E.g. implementation is needed to
understand some design.
▪ Difficult to estimate time and cost for the phases.
▪ Handling risks are not part of the model. Pushes the risks forward.
▪ Software "is not" developed in such a way. It evolves when problems are more
understood.
▪ Doesn't support iteration, so changes can cause confusion
▪ Difficult for customers to state all requirements explicitly and up front
▪ Requires customer patience because a working version of the program doesn't
occur until the final phase
▪ Problems can be somewhat alleviated in the model through the addition of
feedback loops
Can We Improve the Model?
Iteration back to previous phase

Danger! e.g. a performance

problem can result in a
major requirements change.
Very expensive rollback...
Waterfall Model with Feedback (Diagram)
Communication
Project initiation
Requirements
gathering

Planning
Estimating
Scheduling
Tracking Modeling
Analysis
Design Construction
Code
Test
Deployment
Delivery
Support
Feedback
18
Spiral Model (Diagram)

Planning

Communication

Start Modeling

Start

Deployment Construction

19
 Cost

Progress
 Spiral Model (Description)

▪ Follows an evolutionary approach

▪ Used when requirements are not well understood and risks are high
▪ Inner spirals focus on identifying software requirements and project risks; may
also incorporate prototyping
▪ Outer spirals take on a classical waterfall approach after requirements have been
defined, but permit iterative growth of the software

21
▪Operates as a risk-driven model…a go/no-go decision
occurs after each complete spiral in order to react to risk
determinations
▪Requires considerable expertise in risk assessment
▪Serves as a realistic model for large-scale software
development
Prototyping Model(Diagram)

Quick
Planning

Communication

Start Modeling
Quick
Deployment, Design
Delivery,
and
Feedback

Construction
Of Prototype
23
 Prototyping Model (Description)

▪ Follows an evolutionary and iterative approach

▪ Used when requirements are not well understood
▪ Serves as a mechanism for identifying software requirements
▪ Focuses on those aspects of the software that are visible to the
customer/user
▪ Feedback is used to refine the prototype

24
Prototyping Model(Potential Problems)
▪ The customer sees a "working version" of the software, wants to stop all
development and then buy the prototype after a "few fixes" are made
▪ Developers often make implementation compromises to get the software
running quickly (e.g., language choice, user interface, operating system choice,
inefficient algorithms)
▪ Lesson learned
▪ Define the rules up front on the final disposition of the prototype before it is built
▪ In most circumstances, plan to discard the prototype and engineer the actual production software with a
goal toward quality

25
Prototyping Model
▪ A customer defines a set of general objectives
for software but does not identify detailed
input, processing, or output requirements

▪ The developer may be unsure of the

efficiency of an algorithm, the adaptability of
an operating system
 Prototyping Model
▪ This model adds prototyping as sub-
process
▪ A prototype is a partially developed product
that enables customers and developers to
examine some aspect of a proposed system
and decide if it is suitable for a finished
product
 Prototyping Model
▪ Used to explore the risky aspects of the system
o Risk of developing the “wrong” system
o User interface without functionality
o Technical risks

▪ Prototype may be thrown away or evolve into

product
 Prototyping Model

List of List of List of List of

Revisions Revisions Revisions Revisions

Revise Customer
Prototype Review

Prototype Prototype Prototype

Test
Requirements Design System

System Delivered
Requirements System
 Prototyping Model (Pros)
▪ Suitable for large systems for
which there is no manual
process to define the
requirements

▪ Much feedback from

customer
 Prototyping Model (Cons)
▪ It may be impossible to tune the
prototype to meet non- functional
requirements

▪ Lot of time at customer

▪ The changes made during

prototype development will
probably have degraded the
system structure
 V Model
▪ The V-model is a variation of the waterfall model that
demonstrates how the testing activities are related to analysis
and design
▪ Developed by the German Ministry of Defense
▪ Unit and system testing verify the program design,
ensuring that parts and whole work correctly
▪ Acceptance testing, conducted by the customer rather than
developers, validates the requirements, trying each system
function meets a particular requirement in the specification
 Maintenance
V Model
Validate Requirements, Verify Specification Acceptance Test
Requirements
(Release testing)

System Design System Testing

Verify System Design
(Architecture High- (Integration testing
level Design) of modules)

Verify Module Design

Module Design Module Testing
(Program Design, (Integration
Detailed Design) testing of units)
Verify Implementation

Implementation
of Units (classes,
procedures, Unit Testing
functions)
 V Model (Pros)
▪ It defines tangible phases of the process, and proposes a
logical sequence in which these phases should be
approached
▪ It also defines logical relationships between the phases
▪ It demands that testing documentation is written as soon
as possible
▪ It gives equal weight to development and testing
▪ It provides a simple and easy to follow map of the
software development process
 V Model (Cons)
▪ It is too simple to accurately reflect the software development process
▪ It is inflexible; it has no ability to respond to change
▪ It produces inefficient testing methodologies
Incremental Development Iterative Development
 Phased Development
▪ Design a system so it can be delivered in pieces, letting users
have some functionality while the rest is under development

▪ There are usually two or more systems in parallel:

a) The operational or production system in use by customers
b) The development system which will replace the current release
Phased Development

Phased Development

Incremental Iterative
Development Development
 Incremental Development

▪ Incremental development partitions a system by functionality

▪ Early release starts with small, functional subsystem, later

releases add functionality
Incremental Development

How? By delivering
several releases?
Incremental Model (Diagram)
Increment #1

Communication
Planning
Modeling
Increment #2 Construction
Deployment
Communication
Planning
Modeling
Construction
Increment #3 Deployment

Communication
Planning
Modeling
Construction
Deploy………

41
Incremental Model (Description)

▪ Used when requirements are well understood

▪ Multiple independent deliveries are identified
▪ Work flow is in a linear (i.e., sequential) fashion within an increment and
is staggered between increments
▪ Iterative in nature; focuses on an operational product with each
increment
▪ Provides a needed set of functionality sooner while delivering optional
components later
▪ Useful also when staffing is too short for a full-scale development
42
 Iterative Development

▪ Iterative development improves overall system in each release

▪ Delivers a full system in the first release, then changes the functionality
of each subsystem with each new release
 Iterative Development
When should the releases take When should the releases take
place? place?
Time-boxing - The time period is Prioritized functionality - Do the
fixed for each iteration. most important parts first.
 Iterative vs. Incremental Development
Incremental Development
Add a new "part" at each increment

Iterative Development
Improve a "working system" at each iteration
 Iterative Development - Pros
▪ Misunderstandings and inconsistency are made clear early (e.g. between
requirement, design, and implementation)
▪ Encourage to use feedback -> elicit the real requirements
▪ Forced to focus on the most critical issues
▪ Continuous testing offers project assessment
▪ Workload is spread out over time (especially test)
▪ The team can get "lesson learned" and continuously improve the process
▪ Stakeholders gets concrete evidence of progress
 Iterative Development - Cons
▪ Problem with current business contracts, especially fixed-price contracts

▪ With short iterations it can be hard to map customer requirements to iterations

Activity