Ic50 Piperin PDF
Ic50 Piperin PDF
Ic50 Piperin PDF
Received on 08 October, 2014; received in revised form, 28 July, 2015; accepted, 22 August, 2015; published 01 September, 2015
maintaining the mixed reagents in the plate for an equation obtained from the log inhibition curve was
extra 6 minutes prevented this inhibition. 0.067mM. There was a difference in efficiency
between the two enzymes with piperine inhibiting
Butyrylcholinesterase activity: BuChE 47% more effectively than AChE at the
Assessment of BuChE inhibition was performed as same concentration; despite AChE reaching 100%
described above, with the exception of 5µlBuChE maximum inhibition and BuChE reaching 67%
replacing AChE and 5µlBTChI replacing ATChI. maximum inhibition. The ratio between the IC50
values is 0.56mM, of which a higher ratio would
Determination of dose response curve and have supported a higher selectivity for the AChE
kinetic parameters: enzyme.
The concentration of piperine that inhibited the
hydrolysis of substrate by 50% (IC50) was
determined by monitoring the effect of various 120
Inhibition [%]
(abs/min))/ control (abs/min)) * 100 = % inhibition. 60
55
RESULTS: 50
Lineweaver-Burk constants (Table 1a and 1b). The as a mixed-inhibitor; where the Vmax values are
control (no piperine), 0.0625mM and 0.125 mM variable whereas the Km values increase. Compared
concentrations were used. The kinetic values for to galanthamine (a mixed competitive non-
AChE classified piperine as a competitive inhibitor; competitive inhibitor, piperine is not as potent as
where the Vmax values remained more or less this positive reference (IC50 of 1.068 nM/ml) as
constant while the Km values increased. However, previously tested under the same assay conditions.
18
the kinetic values for BuChE classified piperine’s
FIG.4: LINEWEAVER-BURK PLOT FOR AChE inhibition(● No piperine, Piperine 0.0625 mM)
DISCUSSION: Previous studies on piperine have further research was essential in order to
used animal models to assess the protective 6 and understand the precise inhibitory mechanism
11
cognitive enhancing effects against piperine exhibits against AChE and BuChE. This
neurodegeneration and cognitive deficit. However study therefore focussed on identifying the
cholinesterase inhibitory property of piperine via glial and BuChE-dependent acting within
kinetic study. Our study demonstrated that piperine conditions of decreased AChE activity such as in
exhibited anti-cholinesterase activity in a dose the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Two pools show
dependent manner. Furthermore, analyses of the different kinetic properties with regard to
Lineweaver-Burk kinetics showed that piperine regulation of brain ACh and can be separated by
followed a competitive inhibition pattern for AChE selective inhibitors.24 In the absence of AChE,
and mixed-inhibition for BuChE. There was a BuChE can hydrolyse ACh and potentially
higher affinity for BuChE with the IC50 value over substitute for AChE without producing peripheral
50 fold that for AChE inhibition. This is in or central cholinergic side effects. Considering the
contrast to galanthamine which has a 50 fold more drastic decrease in AChE activity taking place in
selective inhibition for AChE over BuChE. 19 the brain and the large pool of BuChE still
available both in glia and neurons, it may not
The proportion of the two enzymes, AChE and institute an advantage for a cholinesterase inhibitor
BuChE, present in the human brain are strongly to be selective for AChE. In contrast, a good
altered during the course of Alzheimer’s disease. In balance between AChE and BuChE inhibition
the cortex AChE activity decreases progressively to should result in higher therapeutic efficacy.22
10-15% of normal values, while BuChE activity is
unchanged or even increased by 20%. This may be Compounds with preferential cholinergic activity
the consequence of a combination of an could potentially be used therapeutically according
accumulation of BuChE in neuritic plaques and of to the severity of Alzheimer’s disease. Dual-
reactive gliosis.20 Given the close spatial cholinergic inhibitors are appropriate for a mild
relationship between glial cell protoplasm and stage of the disease where the Km of ACh is low
synaptic gap, it is likely that extracellularly- enough to keep BuChE inactivated.26
diffusing ACh may come in contact with glial
BuChE and be effectively hydrolysed as a The present knowledge of the molecular
result.21An important feature distinguishing BuChE configuration of the two enzymes would allow
from AChE is the enzymes kinetics toward researchers to design compounds possessing well-
concentrations of ACh. An excess of this substrate balanced AChE-BuChE specificity, high central
(µM) will inhibit only AChE but not BuChE. nerve system (CNS) penetration and low peripheral
Consequently, because of the difference in Km of and central cholinergic toxicity. Some of the
the two enzymes, glial BuChE is less efficient in second generation cholinesterase inhibitors have
hydrolysing ACh at low substrate concentrations demonstrated some of the advantages of these
(sub-µM) than neuronal AChE.22 The mechanism characteristics.22 Comparing this study’s findings
of inhibition caused by the excess of substrate has with the current literature on approved
been clarified.23 cholinesterase inhibitors; piperine evidently inhibits
both cholinergic enzymes and has an added affinity
Comparing the synaptic function between the two for BuChE, which is seemingly a pertinent
enzymes has shown variations between studies. An characteristic to have for higher therapeutic
extensive investigation found that AChE inhibition efficiency.
was more efficient than BuChE in elevating
cortical ACh using a non-selective inhibitor Research findings have revealed piperine to exhibit
compound eptastigmine. 24 Interestingly when a range of pharmacological effects, particularly
comparing these results against a BuChE specific with neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s.
inhibitor MF 8622, a high elevation of ACh similar A study by Chonpathompikunlert et al.6 infused
to that of eptastigmine, without the typical piperine at doses 5, 10, 20 mg/kg/body weight for 3
cholinergic side effects was demonstrated.25 The weeks bilaterally via intracerebro ventricular route
results of these experiments support the concept of as a bypassing strategy into the CNS. The findings
two pools of functional cholinesterases in the brain, were significantly improved spatial memory and
one neuronal and AChE-dependent acting mainly neurodegeneration, however there was a lack of
within physiological conditions and one mainly dose response relationship of piperine and AChE,
indicating the dose range was too high, therefore a 3. Lleό A: Current therapeutic options for Alzheimer’s
disease. Curr Genomics2007; 8: 550-558.
saturation effect was observed. A more recent 4. Duysen EG, Li B, Darvesh S, Lockridge O: Sensitivity of
investigation into the antidepressant and cognitive butyrylcholinesterase knockout mice to (-)-huperzine A
effects of piperine-encapsulated liposomes (PL) and donepezil suggests humans with butyrylcholinesterase
deficiency may not tolerate these Alzheimer’s disease
employed a randomly assigned oral dose of 5 drugs and indicatesbutyrylcholinesterase function in
mg/kg/body weight or an intranasal administration neurotransmission. Toxicology2007; 233: 60-69.
of 48 ng/kg/body weight in male Wister rats for 14 5. Xie WH, Stribley JA, Chatonnet A, Wilder PJ, Rizzino A,
McComb RD, Taylor P, Hinrichs SH, Locridge O:
days. 27 Postnatal developmental delay and supersensitivity to
organophosphate in gene-targeted mice lacking
The results showed a 60% efficiency of PL when acetylcholinesterase.J PharmacolExpTher2000; 293: 896-
902.
administered intra-nasally, delivering piperine to 6. Chonpathompikunlert P, Wattanathorn J, Muchimapura S:
the hippocampus at a faster rate and higher extent Piperine, the main alkaloid of Thai black pepper protects
than oral does. Intranasal delivery of piperine from against neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in
animal model of cognitive deficit like condition of
the liposomes could therefore reduce the dose of Alzheimer’s disease. Food ChemToxicol2010; 48: 798-
piperine intake while giving similar cognitive and 802.
antidepressant effects as the oral dosage.27 The 7. Gupta SK, Bansal P, Bhardwaj RK, Velpandian T:
Comparative antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory and
various routes of administration shown by these toxicity profile of nimesulide and piperine combination.
studies, has provided substantial research and Pharmacol Res2000; 41: 657-662.
findings toward the development and 8. D́hooge R , Pei YQ, Raes A, Lebrun P, van Bogaert PP,
DeDeyn PP: Anticonvulsant activity of piperine on
implementation of piperine as a drug. seizures induced by excitatory amino acid receptor
agonist.Arzneimittelforschung1996; 46: 557-560.
CONCLUSION: Findings of this research have 9. Bai YF, Xu H: Protective action of piperine against
experimental gastric ulcer. Acta Pharmacol Sin2000; 21:
provided a preliminary insight into the mechanism 357-359.
of AChE and BuChE inhibition by piperine, 10. Lee SA, Hong SS, Han XH, Hwang JS, Oh GJ, Lee KS,
concluding that it inhibits both cholinesterase Lee MK, Hwang BY, Ro JS: Piperine from fruits of Piper
longum with inhibitory effect on monoamine oxidase and
enzymes and exhibits more selectivity toward antidepressant-like activity. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)
BuChE. The study also demonstrates competitive 2005; 53: 832-835.
inhibition for AChE and mixed-inhibition for 11. Wattanathorn J, Chonpathompikunlert P, Muchimapura S,
Priprem A, Tankamnerdthai O: Piperine, the potential
BuChE. Compared to galanthamine (a mixed functional food for mood and cognitive disorders. Food
competitive non-competitive inhibitor), we ChemToxicol2008; 46: 3106-3110.
conclude that although the AChE inhibition by 12. Selvendrian K, Singh JP, Krishnan KB, Sakthisekaran
D:Cytoprotective effects of piperine against
piperine is not as potent as that of galanthamine, in benzo[a]pyrene induced lung cancer with reference to lipid
addition to its known antioxidant and anti- peroxidation and antioxidant system in Swiss albino
inflammatory activities, piperine could provide a mice.Fitoterapia2003; 74: 109-115.
13. Ellman GL, Courtney KD, Andres V, Jr. Featherstone RM:
novel poly-pharmacological lead of potential A new and rapid colorimetric determination of
benefit to the treatment of AD and therefore acetylcholinesterase activity.BiochemPharmacol1961; 7:
warrants further investigation. Further in silico 88-95.
14. Okello EJ, Savelev SU, Perry EK: In vitro anti-beta
docking studies and in vivo enzyme evaluation are secretase and dual anti-cholinesterase activity of Camellia
therefore warranted in order to confirm our sinensis L. (tea) relevant to treatment of dementia.
mechanistic studies and to determine the safe dose Phytother Res2004; 18: 624-627.
15. Haboubi NA, Thurnham DI: Effect of ethanol on
of which limitations were found 6 and whether erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase activity. Ann
intranasal or oral administration are a practical ClinBiochem1986; 23:458-462.
approach for human trials. 16. Baker GM, Chen CH: The effects of ethanol on the
structural stability of acetylcholine receptor and the
activity of various molecular forms of
CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None acetylcholinesterase.BiochimBiophysActa1989; 992: 333-
340.
17. Dudek IM, Kedziora J, Zagorski T, Chmielewski H,
REFERENCES: Lisiewicz J, Mazurek M:Activities of acetylcholinesterase
1. Giannakopoulos P, Hof PR: Dementia in Clinical Practice. and Na+, K+ -ATP-ase in human erythrocytes after
Front Neurol Neurosci 2009; 24:1–11. ethanol consumption. Int J Occup Med Environ
2. Dash P, Villemarette-Pittman N: Alzheimer’s disease. Health1995; 8: 109-114.
Demos Health Publishing, 2005.
18. Crowch CM, Okello EJ: Kinetics of acetylcholinesterase Ariel N: Substrate-inhibition of acetylcholinesterase:
inhibitory activities by aqueous extracts of Acacia nilotica residues affecting signal transduction from the surface to
(L.) and Rhamnusprinoides (L’Hér.). Afr J Pharm the catalytic centre. EMBO J1992; 11: 3561-3568.
Pharmacol2009; 3: 469-475. 24. Giacobini E: Cholinesterase inhibitors: new roles and
19. Thomsen T, Kewitz H: Selective inhibition of human therapeutic alternatives. Pharmacol Res2004; 50: 433-440.
acetylcholinesterase by galanthamine in vitro and in vivo. 25. Giacobini E, Zhu XD, Williams E and Sherman KA: The
Life Sci1990; 46: 1553-8. effect of selective reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor
20. Wright CI, Geula C, Mesulam MM: Neurological E2020 on extracellular acetylcholine and biogenic amine
cholinesterase in the normal brain and in Alzheimer’s levels in rat cortex. Neuropharmacology1996; 35: 205-
disease: relationship to plaques, tangles and patterns of 211.
selective vulnerability Ann Neurol1993; 34; 373-384. 26. Savelev SU, Okello EJ, Perry EK: Butyryl- and acetyl-
21. Giacobini E, Griffini PL, Maggi T, Mascellani G, Mandelli cholinesterase inhibitory activities in essential oils of
R:Butyrylcholinesterase: is it important for cortical Salvia species and their constituents. Phytother Res2004;
acetylcholine regulation.SocNeurosci1996; 22:203. 18: 315-324.
22. Giacobini E: From molecular structure to Alzheimer’s 27. Priprem A, Chonpathompikunlert P, Sutthiparinyanont S,
therapy.Jpn J Pharmacol1997; 74: 225-241. Wattanathorn J: Antidepressant and cognitive activities of
23. Shafferman A, Velan B, Ordentlich A, Kronman C, intranasal piperine-encapsulated liposomes. Advances in
Grosfeld H, Leitner M, Flashner Y, Cohen S, Barak D, Bioscience and Biotechnology2011; 2: 108-116.
All © 2013 are reserved by International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. This Journal licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
This article can be downloaded to ANDROID OS based mobile. Scan QR Code using Code/Bar Scanner from your mobile. (Scanners are available on Google
Playstore)