Aggregates For Concrete

HOME
PAGE
CHAPTER 5
Aggregates for Concrete
The importance of using the right type and quality of bination of gravels or crushed stone with particles
aggregates cannot be overemphasized. The fine and predominantly larger than 5 mm (0.2 in.) and generally
coarse aggregates generally occupy 60% to 75% of the between 9.5 mm and 37.5 mm (3⁄8 in. and 11⁄2 in.). Some
concrete volume (70% to 85% by mass) and strongly influ- natural aggregate deposits, called pit-run gravel, consist
ence the concrete’s freshly mixed and hardened proper- of gravel and sand that can be readily used in concrete
ties, mixture proportions, and economy. Fine aggregates after minimal processing. Natural gravel and sand are
(Fig. 5-1) generally consist of natural sand or crushed usually dug or dredged from a pit, river, lake, or seabed.
stone with most particles smaller than 5 mm (0.2 in.). Crushed stone is produced by crushing quarry rock, boul-
Coarse aggregates (Fig. 5-2) consist of one or a com- ders, cobbles, or large-size gravel. Crushed air-cooled
blast-furnace slag is also used as fine or coarse aggregate.
The aggregates are usually washed and graded at the
pit or plant. Some variation in the type, quality, cleanli-
ness, grading, moisture content, and other properties is
expected. Close to half of the coarse aggregates used in
portland cement concrete in North America are gravels;
most of the remainder are crushed stones.
Naturally occurring concrete aggregates are a mixture
of rocks and minerals (see Table 5-1). A mineral is a natu-
rally occurring solid substance with an orderly internal
structure and a chemical composition that ranges within
narrow limits. Rocks, which are classified as igneous, sedi-
mentary, or metamorphic, depending on origin, are gener-
ally composed of several minerals. For example, granite
contains quartz, feldspar, mica, and a few other minerals;
Fig. 5-1. Closeup of fine aggregate (sand). (69792) most limestones consist of calcite, dolomite, and minor
amounts of quartz, feldspar, and clay. Weathering and
Video erosion of rocks produce particles of stone, gravel, sand,
silt, and clay.
Recycled concrete, or crushed waste concrete, is a
feasible source of aggregates and an economic reality,
especially where good aggregates are scarce. Conven-
tional stone crushing equipment can be used, and new
equipment has been developed to reduce noise and dust.
Aggregates must conform to certain standards for
optimum engineering use: they must be clean, hard,
strong, durable particles free of absorbed chemicals, coat-
ings of clay, and other fine materials in amounts that could
affect hydration and bond of the cement paste. Aggregate
particles that are friable or capable of being split are unde-
Fig. 5-2. Coarse aggregate. Rounded gravel (left) and sirable. Aggregates containing any appreciable amounts
crushed stone (right). (69791) of shale or other shaly rocks, soft and porous materials,
79
Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures ◆ EB001
Table 5-1. Rock and Mineral Constituents in should be avoided; certain types of chert should be espe-
Aggregates cially avoided since they have low resistance to weather-
Minerals Igneous rocks Metamorphic rocks
ing and can cause surface defects such as popouts.
Identification of the constituents of an aggregate
Silica Granite Marble
cannot alone provide a basis for predicting the behavior of
Quartz Syenite Metaquartzite
Opal Diorite Slate aggregates in service. Visual inspection will often disclose
Chalcedony Gabbro Phyllite weaknesses in coarse aggregates. Service records are
Tridymite Peridotite Schist invaluable in evaluating aggregates. In the absence of a
Cristobalite Pegmatite Amphibolite performance record, the aggregates should be tested
Silicates Volcanic glass Hornfels before they are used in concrete. The most commonly used
Feldspars Obsidian Gneiss aggregates—sand, gravel, crushed stone, and air-cooled
Ferromagnesian Pumice Serpentinite blast-furnace slag—produce freshly mixed normal-weight
Hornblende Tuff
concrete with a density (unit weight) of 2200 to 2400
Augite Scoria
Clay Perlite kg/m3 (140 to 150 lb/ft3). Aggregates of expanded shale,
Illites Pitchstone clay, slate, and slag (Fig. 5-3) are used to produce struc-
Kaolins Felsite tural lightweight concrete with a freshly mixed density
Chlorites Basalt ranging from about 1350 to 1850 kg/m3 (90 to 120 lb/ft3).
Montmorillonites Other lightweight materials such as pumice, scoria,
Mica Sedimentary rocks
perlite, vermiculite, and diatomite are used to produce
Zeolite Conglomerate insulating lightweight concretes ranging in density from
Carbonate Sandstone
about 250 to 1450 kg/m3 (15 to 90 lb/ft3). Heavyweight
Calcite Quartzite
Dolomite Graywacke
materials such as barite, limonite, magnetite, ilmenite,
Sulfate Subgraywacke hematite, iron, and steel punchings or shot are used to
Gypsum Arkose produce heavyweight concrete and radiation-shielding
Anhydrite Claystone, siltstone, concrete (ASTM C 637 and C 638). Only normal-weight
Iron sulfide argillite, and shale aggregates are discussed in this chapter. See Chapter 18
Pyrite Carbonates for special types of aggregates and concretes.
Marcasite Limestone Normal-weight aggregates should meet the require-
Pyrrhotite Dolomite ments of ASTM C 33 or AASHTO M 6/M 80. These speci-
Iron oxide Marl
fications limit the permissible amounts of deleterious
Magnetite Chalk
Hematite Chert substances and provide requirements for aggregate char-
Goethite acteristics. Compliance is determined by using one or
lmenite more of the several standard tests cited in the following
Limonite sections and tables. However, the fact that aggregates
satisfy ASTM C 33 or AASHTO M 6/M 80 requirements
For brief descriptions, see “Standard Descriptive Nomenclature of
Constituents of Natural Mineral Aggregates” (ASTM C 294). does not necessarily assure defect-free concrete.
For adequate consolidation of concrete, the desirable
amount of air, water, cement, and fine aggregate (that is,
the mortar fraction) should be about 50% to 65% by
absolute volume (45% to 60% by mass). Rounded aggre-
gate, such as gravel, requires slightly lower values, while
crushed aggregate requires slightly higher values. Fine
aggregate content is usually 35% to 45% by mass or
volume of the total aggregate content.
CHARACTERISTICS OF AGGREGATES
The important characteristics of aggregates for concrete are
listed in Table 5-2 and most are discussed in the following
section:
Fig. 5-3. Lightweight aggregate. Expanded clay (left) and

expanded shale (right). (69793) Grading
Grading is the particle-size distribution of an aggregate as
determined by a sieve analysis (ASTM C 136 or AASHTO
80
Chapter 5 ◆ Aggregates for Concrete
T 27). The range of particle sizes in aggregate is illustrated (0.046 in. to 4 in.). Tolerances for the dimensions of open-
in Fig. 5-4. The aggregate particle size is determined by ings in sieves are listed in ASTM E 11 (AASHTO M 92).
using wire-mesh sieves with square openings. The seven Size numbers (grading sizes) for coarse aggregates
standard ASTM C 33 (AASHTO M 6/M 80) sieves for fine apply to the amounts of aggregate (by mass) in percent-
aggregate have openings ranging from 150 µm to 9.5 mm ages that pass through an assortment of sieves (Fig. 5-5).
(No. 100 sieve to 3⁄8 in.). The 13 standard sieves for coarse For highway construction, ASTM D 448 (AASHTO M 43)
aggregate have openings ranging from 1.18 mm to 100 mm lists the same 13 size numbers as in ASTM C 33
Table 5.2. Characteristics and Tests of Aggregate

Characteristic Significance Test designation* Requirement or item reported
Resistance to abrasion Index of aggregate quality; ASTM C 131 (AASHTO T 96) Maximum percentage of
and degradation wear resistance of floors and ASTM C 535 weight loss. Depth of wear
pavements ASTM C 779 and time
Resistance to freezing Surface scaling, roughness, ASTM C 666 (AASHTO T 161) Maximum number of cycles
and thawing loss of section, and ASTM C 682 or period of frost immunity;
aesthetics (AASHTO T 103 durability factor
Resistance to disintegration Soundness against ASTM C 88 (AASHTO T 104) Weight loss, particles
by sulfates weathering action exhibiting distress
Particle shape and Workability of fresh ASTM C 295 Maximum percentage of flat
surface texture concrete ASTM D 3398 and elongated particles
Grading Workability of fresh concrete; ASTM C 117 (AASHTO T 11) Minimum and maximum
economy ASTM C 136 (AASHTO T 27) percentage passing
standard sieves
Fine aggregate degradation Index of aggregate quality; ASTM C 1137 Change in grading
Resistance to degradation
during mixing
Uncompacted void content Workability of fresh ASTM C 1252 (AASHTO T 304) Uncompacted voids and
of fine aggregate concrete specific gravity values
Bulk density Mix design calculations; ASTM C 29 (AASHTO T 19) Compact weight and
(unit weight) classification loose weight
Relative density Mix design calculations ASTM C 127 (AASHTO T 85) —
(specific gravity) fine aggregate
ASTM C 128 (AASHTO T 84)
coarse aggregate
Absorption and surface Control of concrete quality ASTM C 70 —
moisture (water-cement ratio) ASTM C 127 (AASHTO T 85)
Compressive and flexural Acceptability of fine ASTM C 39 (AASHTO T 22) Strength to exceed 95% of
strength aggregate failing other tests ASTM C 78 (AASHTO T 97) strength achieved with purified
sand
Definitions of constituents Clear understanding and ASTM C 125 —
communication ASTM C 294
Aggregate constituents Determine amount of ASTM C 40 (AASHTO T 21) Maximum percentage allowed
deleterious and organic ASTM C 87 (AASHTO T 71) of individual constituents
materials ASTM C 117 (AASHTO T 11)
ASTM C 295
Resistance to alkali Soundness against ASTM C 227 Maximum length change,
reactivity and volume volume change ASTM C 289 constituents and amount
change ASTM C 295 of silica, and alkalinity
ASTM C 342
ASTM C 586
ASTM C 1293
* The majority of the tests and characteristics listed are referenced in ASTM C 33 (AASHTO M 6/M 80). ACI 221R-96 presents additional test
methods and properties of concrete influenced by aggregate characteristics.
81
100
Video
80
Percent passing, by mass
at e
s an
60
reg
e
and
Fin
gg
ea
es
o. 5 te
F in
ars
e N ega
40
Co
7
Siz aggr
rse
Coa
20
Optional,
see text
Fig. 5-4. Range of particle sizes found in aggregate for use 0

in concrete. (8985) µm
0 00 0 0
µm µm
0 0 8m 6
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m m
m .
6 5
15 o. 1 30 o. 5 60 o. 3 1.1 o. 1 2.3 o. 8 4.7 o. 4 .5 . 25 in. 7.5 1 /2 in
N N N N N N 12 1 /2 in 1 3 1
Sieve sizes
(AASHTO M 6/ M 80) plus an additional six more coarse Fig. 5-6. Curves indicate the limits specified in ASTM C 33
aggregate size numbers. Fine aggregate or sand has only for fine aggregate and for one commonly used size number
one range of particle sizes for general construction and (grading size) of coarse aggregate.
highway work.
The grading and grading limits are usually expressed
as the percentage of material passing each sieve. Fig. 5-6 aggregate proportions as well as cement and water
shows these limits for fine aggregate and for one size of requirements, workability, pumpability, economy, poros-
coarse aggregate. ity, shrinkage, and durability of concrete. Variations in
There are several reasons for specifying grading limits grading can seriously affect the uniformity of concrete
Video and nominal maximum aggregate size; they affect relative from batch to batch. Very fine sands are often uneconomi-
cal; very coarse sands and coarse aggregate can produce
harsh, unworkable mixtures. In general, aggregates that
do not have a large deficiency or excess of any size and
give a smooth grading curve will produce the most satis-
factory results.
The effect of a collection of various sizes in reducing
the total volume of voids between aggregates is illustrated
by the simple method shown in Fig. 5-7. The beaker on the
left is filled with large aggregate particles of uniform size
Video
Fig. 5-7. The level of liquid in the graduates, representing

voids, is constant for equal absolute volumes of aggre-
gates of uniform but different size. When different sizes are
Fig. 5-5. Making a sieve analysis test of coarse aggregate combined, the void-content decreases. The illustration is
in a laboratory. (30175-A) not to scale.
82
and shape; the middle beaker is filled with an equal Fine-Aggregate Grading
volume of small aggregate particles of uniform size and
shape; and the beaker on the right is filled with particles Requirements of ASTM C 33 or AASHTO M 6/M 43 per-
of both sizes. Below each beaker is a graduate with the mit a relatively wide range in fine-aggregate gradation,
amount of water required to fill the voids in that beaker. but specifications by other organizations are sometimes
Note that when the beakers are filled with one particle size more restrictive. The most desirable fine-aggregate grad-
of equal volume, the void content is constant, regardless of ing depends on the type of work, the richness of the
the particle size. When the two aggregate sizes are mixture, and the maximum size of coarse aggregate. In
combined, the void content is decreased. If this operation leaner mixtures, or when small-size coarse aggregates are
were repeated with several additional sizes, a further used, a grading that approaches the maximum recom-
reduction in voids would occur. The cement paste require- mended percentage passing each sieve is desirable for
ment for concrete is related to the void content of the workability. In general, if the water-cement ratio is kept
combined aggregates. constant and the ratio of fine-to-coarse aggregate is chosen
During the early years of concrete technology it was correctly, a wide range in grading can be used without
sometimes assumed that the smallest percentage of voids measurable effect on strength. However, the best economy
(greatest density of aggregates) was the most suitable for will sometimes be achieved by adjusting the concrete
concrete. At the same time, limits were placed on the mixture to suit the gradation of the local aggregates.
amount and size of the smallest particles. It is now known Fine-aggregate grading within the limits of ASTM C
that, even on this restricted basis, this is not the best target 33 (AASHTO M 6) is generally satisfactory for most
for the mix designer. However, production of satisfactory, concretes. The ASTM C 33 (AASHTO M 6) limits with
economical concrete requires aggregates of low void respect to sieve size are shown in Table 5-3.
content, but not the lowest. Voids in aggregates can be
tested according to ASTM C 29 or AASHTO T 19. Table 5-3. Fine-Aggregate Grading Limits
In reality, the amount of cement paste required in (ASTM C 33/AASHTO M 6)
concrete is greater than the volume of voids between the
Sieve size Percent passing by mass
aggregates. This is illustrated in Fig. 5-8. Sketch A repre-
sents large aggregates alone, with all particles in contact. 9.5 mm (3⁄8 in.) 100
Sketch B represents the dispersal of aggregates in a matrix 4.75 mm (No. 4) 95 to 100
2.36 mm (No. 8) 80 to 100
of paste. The amount of paste is necessarily greater than
1.18 mm (No. 16) 50 to 85
the void content of sketch A in order to provide workabil-
600 µm (No. 30) 25 to 60
ity to the concrete; the actual amount is influenced by the 300 µm (No. 50) 5 to 30 (AASHTO 10 to 30)
workability and cohesiveness of the paste. 150 µm (No. 100) 0 to 10 (AASHTO 2 to 10)
The AASHTO specifications permit the minimum

percentages (by mass) of material passing the 300 µm (No.
50) and 150 µm (No. 100) sieves to be reduced to 5% and
0% respectively, provided:
1. The aggregate is used in air-entrained concrete
containing more than 237 kilograms of cement per
cubic meter (400 lb of cement per cubic yard) and
having an air content of more than 3%.
A 2. The aggregate is used in concrete containing more
than 297 kilograms of cement per cubic meter (500 lb
of cement per cubic yard) when the concrete is not air-
entrained.
3. An approved supplementary cementitious material is
used to supply the deficiency in material passing
these two sieves.
Other requirements of ASTM C 33 (AASTHO M 6) are:
1. The fine aggregate must not have more than 45%
retained between any two consecutive standard
B sieves.
2. The fineness modulus must be not less than 2.3 nor
Fig. 5-8. Illustration of the dispersion of aggregates in co- more than 3.1, nor vary more than 0.2 from the typical
hesive concrete mixtures. value of the aggregate source. If this value is ex-
83
ceeded, the fine aggregate should be rejected unless Table 5-4. Determination of Fineness Modulus of
suitable adjustments are made in proportions of fine Fine Aggregates
and coarse aggregate. Percentage
The amounts of fine aggregate passing the 300 µm of individual Cumulative
(No. 50) and 150, µm (No. 100) sieves affect workability, fraction Percentage percentage
retained, passing, retained,
surface texture, air content, and bleeding of concrete. Most
Sieve size by mass by mass by mass
specifications allow 5% to 30% to pass the 300 µm (No. 50)
9.5 mm (3⁄8 in.) 0 100 0
sieve. The lower limit may be sufficient for easy placing 4.75 mm (No. 4) 2 98 2
conditions or where concrete is mechanically finished, 2.36 mm (No. 8) 13 85 15
such as in pavements. However, for hand-finished 1.18 mm (No. 16) 20 65 35
concrete floors, or where a smooth surface texture is de- 600 µm (No. 30) 20 45 55
sired, fine aggregate with at least 15% passing the 300 µm 300 µm (No. 50) 24 21 79
(No. 50) sieve and 3% or more passing the 150 µm (No. 150 µm (No. 100) 18 3 97
Pan 3 0 —
100) sieve should be used.
Total 100 283
Video Fineness Modulus. The fineness modulus (FM) of either Fineness modulus
fine or coarse aggregate according to ASTM C 125 is calcu- = 283 ÷ 100 = 2.83
lated by adding the cumulative percentages by mass
retained on each of a specified series of sieves and divid-
ing the sum by 100. The specified sieves for determining given maximum-size coarse aggregate can be varied over
FM are: 150 µm (No. 100), 300 µm (No. 50), 600 µm (No. a moderate range without appreciable effect on cement
30), 1.18 mm (No. 16), 2.36 mm (No. 8), 4.75 mm (No. 4), and water requirement of a mixture if the proportion of
9.5 mm (3⁄8 in.), 19.0 mm (3⁄4 in.), 37.5 mm (11⁄2 in.), 75 mm fine aggregate to total aggregate produces concrete of
(3 in.) and, 150 mm (6 in.). good workability. Mixture proportions should be changed
FM is an index of the fineness of an aggregate—the to produce workable concrete if wide variations occur in
higher the FM, the coarser the aggregate. Different aggre- the coarse-aggregate grading. Since variations are difficult
gate grading may have the same FM. FM of fine aggregate
to anticipate, it is often more economical to maintain
is useful in estimating proportions of fine and coarse
uniformity in manufacturing and handling coarse aggre-
aggregates in concrete mixtures. An example of how the
gate than to reduce variations in gradation.
FM of a fine aggregate is determined (with an assumed
The maximum size of coarse aggregate used in con-
sieve analysis) is shown in Table 5-4.
Degradation of fine aggregate due to friction and crete has a bearing on the economy of concrete. Usually
abrasion will decrease the FM and increase the amount of more water and cement is required for small-size aggre-
materials finer than the 75 µm (No. 200) sieve. gates than for large sizes, due to an increase in total aggre-
gate surface area. The water and cement required for a
slump of approximately 75 mm (3 in.) is shown in Fig. 5-9
Coarse-Aggregate Grading for a wide range of coarse-aggregate sizes. Fig. 5-9 shows
The coarse aggregate grading requirements of ASTM C 33 that, for a given water-cement ratio, the amount of cement
(AASHTO M 80) permit a wide range in grading and a required decreases as the maximum size of coarse aggre-
variety of grading sizes (see Table 5-5). The grading for a gate increases. The increased cost of obtaining and/or
Table 5-5. Grading Requirements for Coarse Aggregates (ASTM C 33 and AASHTO M 80)
Amounts finer than each laboratory sieve, mass percent passing
Size Nominal size, sieves 100 mm 90 mm 75 mm 63 mm 50 mm
number with square openings (4 in.) (31⁄2 in.) (3 in.) (21⁄2 in.) (2 in.)
1 90 to 37.5 mm (31⁄2 to 11⁄2 in.) 100 90 to 100 — 25 to 60 —
2 63 to 37.5 mm (21⁄2 to 11⁄2 in.) — — 100 90 to 100 35 to 70
3 50 to 25.0 mm (2 to 1 in.) — — — 100 90 to 100
357 50 to 4.75 mm (2 in. to No. 4) — — — 100 95 to 100
4 37.5 to 19.0 mm (11⁄2 to 3⁄4 in.) — — — — 100
467 37.5 to 4.75 mm (11⁄2 in. to No. 4) — — — — 100
5 25.0 to 12.5 mm (1 to 1⁄2 in.) — — — — —
56 25.0 to 9.5 mm (1 to 3⁄8 in.) — — — — —
57 25.0 to 4.75 mm (1 in. to No. 4) — — — — —
6 19.0 to 9.5 mm (3⁄4 to 3⁄8 in.) — — — — —
67 19.0 to 4.75 mm (3⁄4 in. to No. 4) — — — — —
7 12.5 to 4.75 mm (1⁄2 in. to No. 4) — — — — —
8 9.5 to 2.36 mm (3⁄8 in. to No. 8) — — — — —
84
Maximum nominal size of aggregate, in. handling aggregates much larger than 50 mm (2 in.) may
3/16 3/8 1/2 3/4 1 11/2 2 3 43/8
300 offset the savings in using less cement. Furthermore,
500
aggregates of different maximum sizes may give slightly
different concrete strengths for the same water-cement
Non-air-entrained concrete 400 ratio. In some instances, at the same water-cement ratio,
concrete with a smaller maximum-size aggregate could
200 have higher compressive strength. This is especially true
for high-strength concrete. The optimum maximum size
Water, kg/m3
Water, lb/yd3
300
of coarse aggregate for higher strength depends on factors
Air-entrained concrete such as relative strength of the cement paste, cement-
200 aggregate bond, and strength of the aggregate particles.
100
The terminology used to specify size of coarse aggre-
gate must be chosen carefully. Particle size is determined
100
by size of sieve and applies to the aggregate passing that
Slump approximately 75 mm (3 in.)
w/c ratio: 0.54 by mass
sieve and not passing the next smaller sieve. When speak-
ing of an assortment of particle sizes, the size number (or
0 0
grading size) of the gradation is used. The size number
450
applies to the collective amount of aggregate that passes
700 through an assortment of sieves. As shown in Table 5-5,
400 the amount of aggregate passing the respective sieves is
given in percentages; it is called a sieve analysis.
Non-air-entrained concrete
Because of past usage, there is sometimes confusion
600
about what is meant by the maximum size of aggregate.
Cement, kg/m3
Cement, lb/yd3
350
ASTM C 125 and ACI 116 define this term and distinguish
it from nominal maximum size of aggregate. The maxi-
300 500 mum size of an aggregate is the smallest sieve that all of a
Air-entrained concrete
particular aggregate must pass through. The nominal
maximum size of an aggregate is the smallest sieve size
250
400
through which the major portion of the aggregate must
Slump approximately 75 mm (3 in.) pass. The nominal maximum-size sieve may retain 5% to
w/c ratio: 0.54 by mass
15% of the aggregate depending on the size number. For
200
example, aggregate size number 67 has a maximum size of
4.75 9.5 12.5 19.0 25.0 37.5 50.0 75.0 112.0
Maximum nominal size of aggregate, mm
25 mm (1 in.) and a nominal maximum size of 19 mm (3⁄4
in.). Ninety to one hundred percent of this aggregate must
Fig. 5-9. Cement and water contents in relation to maximum pass the 19-mm (3⁄4-in.) sieve and all of the particles must
size of aggregate for air-entrained and non-air-entrained con- pass the 25-mm (1-in.) sieve.
crete. Less cement and water are required in mixtures having
large coarse aggregate (Bureau of Reclamation 1981). The maximum size of aggregate that can be used
generally depends on the size and shape of the concrete
member and the amount and distribution of reinforcing
steel. The maximum size of aggregate particles generally
should not exceed:
37.5 mm 25.0 mm 19.0 mm 12.5 mm 9.5 mm 4.75 mm 2.36 mm 1.18 mm

(11⁄2 in.) (1 in.) (3⁄4 in.) (1⁄2 in.) (3⁄8 in.) (No. 4) (No. 8) (No. 16)
0 to 15 — 0 to 5 — — — — —
0 to 15 — 0 to 5 — — — — —
35 to 70 0 to 15 — 0 to 5 — — — —
— 35 to 70 — 10 to 30 — 0 to 5 — —
90 to 100 20 to 55 0 to 15 — 0 to 5 — — —
95 to 100 — 35 to 70 — 10 to 30 0 to 5 — —
100 90 to 100 20 to 55 0 to 10 0 to 5 — — —
100 90 to 100 40 to 85 10 to 40 0 to 15 0 to 5 — —
100 95 to 100 — 25 to 60 — 0 to 10 0 to 5 —
— 100 90 to 100 20 to 55 0 to 15 0 to 5 — —
— 100 90 to 100 — 25 to 55 0 to 10 0 to 5 —
— — 100 90 to 100 40 to 70 0 to 15 0 to 5 —
— — — 100 85 to 100 10 to 30 0 to 10 0 to 5
85
1. One-fifth the narrowest dimension of a concrete • The optimum mixture has the least particle interfer-
member ence and responds best to a high frequency, high
2. Three-quarters the clear spacing between reinforcing amplitude vibrator.
bars and between the reinforcing bars and forms However, this optimum mixture cannot be used for
3. One-third the depth of slabs all construction due to variations in placing and finishing
These requirements may be waived if, in the judg- needs and availability. Crouch (2000) found in his studies
ment of the engineer, the mixture possesses sufficient on air-entrained concrete that the water-cement ratio
workability that the concrete can be properly placed with- could be reduced by over 8% using combined aggregate
out honeycomb or voids. gradation. Shilstone (1990) also analyzes aggregate grada-
tion by coarseness and workability factors to improve
Combined Aggregate Grading aggregate gradation.
Aggregate is sometimes analyzed using the combined Gap-Graded Aggregates Video

grading of fine and coarse aggregate together, as they exist
in a concrete mixture. This provides a more thorough In gap-graded aggregates certain particle sizes are inten-
analysis of how the aggregates will perform in concrete. tionally omitted. For cast-in-place concrete, typical gap-
Sometimes mid-sized aggregate, around the 9.5 mm (3⁄8 graded aggregates consist of only one size of coarse
in.) size, is lacking in an aggregate supply, resulting in a aggregate with all the particles of fine aggregate able to
concrete with high shrinkage properties, high water pass through the voids in the compacted coarse aggregate.
demand, poor workability, poor pumpability, and poor Gap-graded mixes are used in architectural concrete to
placeability. Strength and durability may also be affected. obtain uniform textures in exposed-aggregate finishes.
Fig. 5-10 illustrates an ideal gradation; however, a They can also used in normal structural concrete because
perfect gradation does not exist in the field—but we can of possible improvements in some concrete properties, and
try to approach it. If problems develop due to a poor to permit the use of local aggregate gradations (Houston
gradation, alternative aggregates, blending, or special 1962 and Litvin and Pfeifer 1965).
screening of existing aggregates, should be considered. For an aggregate of 19-mm (3⁄4-in.) maximum size, the
Refer to Shilstone (1990) for options on obtaining optimal 4.75 mm to 9.5 mm (No. 4 to 3⁄8 in.) particles can be omit-
grading of aggregate. ted without making the concrete unduly harsh or subject
The combined gradation can be used to better control to segregation. In the case of 37.5 mm (11⁄2 in.) aggregate,
workability, pumpability, shrinkage, and other properties usually the 4.75 mm to 19 mm (No. 4 to 3⁄4 in.) sizes are
of concrete. Abrams (1918) and Shilstone (1990) demon- omitted.
strate the benefits of a combined aggregate analysis: Care must be taken in choosing the percentage of fine
aggregate in a gap-graded mixture. A wrong choice can
• With constant cement content and constant consis- result in concrete that is likely to segregate or honeycomb
tency, there is an optimum for every combination of because of an excess of coarse aggregate. Also, concrete
aggregates that will produce the most effective water with an excess of fine aggregate could have a high water
to cement ratio and highest strength. demand resulting in a low-density concrete. Fine aggregate
is usually 25% to 35% by volume of the total aggregate. The
lower percentage is used with rounded aggregates and the
25
higher with crushed material. For a smooth off-the-form
finish, a somewhat higher percentage of fine aggregate to
20 total aggregate may be used than for an exposed-aggregate
finish, but both use a lower fine aggregate content than
Percent retained
continuously graded mixtures. Fine aggregate content also

15
depends upon cement content, type of aggregate, and
workability.
10 Air entrainment is usually required for workability
since low-slump, gap-graded mixes use a low fine aggre-
gate percentage and produce harsh mixes without
5
entrained air.
Segregation of gap-graded mixes must be prevented
0 by restricting the slump to the lowest value consistent with
good consolidation. This may vary from zero to 75 mm (to
5
0
0
5
9.5
5
75
45
37.
25.
19.
12.
4.7
2.3
1.1
5
0.6
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
3 in.) depending on the thickness of the section, amount of

Sieve size in mm reinforcement, and height of casting. Close control of grad-
Fig. 5-10. Optimum combined aggregate grading for ing and water content is also required because variations
concrete. might cause segregation. If a stiff mixture is required, gap-
86
graded aggregates may produce higher strengths than

normal aggregates used with comparable cement contents.
Because of their low fine-aggregate volumes and low
water-cement ratios, gap-graded mixtures might be
considered unworkable for some cast-in-place construc-
tion. When properly proportioned, however, these con-
cretes are readily consolidated with vibration.
Video Particle Shape and Surface Texture

The particle shape and surface texture of an aggregate
influence the properties of freshly mixed concrete more
than the properties of hardened concrete. Rough-textured,
angular, elongated particles require more water to
produce workable concrete than do smooth, rounded,
compact aggregates. Hence, aggregate particles that are Fig. 5-11. Videograder for measuring size and shape of
angular require more cement to maintain the same water- aggregate. (69545)
cement ratio. However, with satisfactory gradation, both
crushed and noncrushed aggregates (of the same rock
types) generally give essentially the same strength for the cameras wherein two-dimensional images are constructed
same cement factor. Angular or poorly graded aggregates from a series of line images. Other machines use matrix-
can also be more difficult to pump. scan cameras to capture two-dimensional snapshots of the
The bond between cement paste and a given aggre- falling aggregate. Maerz and Lusher (2001) developed a
gate generally increases as particles change from smooth dynamic prototype imaging system that provides particle
and rounded to rough and angular. This increase in bond size and shape information by using a miniconveyor
is a consideration in selecting aggregates for concrete system to parade individual fragments past two orthogo-
where flexural strength is important or where high nally oriented, synchronized cameras.
compressive strength is needed.
Void contents of compacted fine or coarse aggregate
Bulk Density (Unit Weight) and Voids Video
can be used as an index of differences in the shape and
texture of aggregates of the same grading. The mixing
The bulk density or unit weight of an aggregate is the
water and cement requirement tend to increase as aggre-
gate void content increases. Voids between aggregate par- mass or weight of the aggregate required to fill a container
ticles increase with aggregate angularity. of a specified unit volume. The volume referred to here is
Aggregate should be relatively free of flat and elon- that occupied by both aggregates and the voids between
gated particles. A particle is called flat and elongated aggregate particles.
when the ratio of length to thickness exceeds a specified The approximate bulk density of aggregate com-
value. See ASTM D 4791 for determination of flat, and/or monly used in normal-weight concrete ranges from about
elongated particles. ASTM D 3398 provides an indirect 1200 to 1750 kg/m3 (75 to 110 lb/ft3). The void content
method of establishing a particle index as an overall meas- between particles affects paste requirements in mix design
ure of particle shape or texture, while ASTM C 295 (see preceding sections, “Particle Shape and Surface
provides procedures for the petrographic examination of Texture” and “Grading”). Void contents range from about
aggregate. 30% to 45% for coarse aggregates to about 40% to 50% for
Flat and elongated aggregate particles should be fine aggregate. Angularity increases void content while
avoided or at least limited to about 15% by mass of the total larger sizes of well-graded aggregate and improved grad-
aggregate. This requirement is equally important for coarse ing decreases void content (Fig. 5-7). Methods of deter-
and for crushed fine aggregate, since fine aggregate made mining the bulk density of aggregates and void content
by crushing stone often contains flat and elongated parti- are given in ASTM C 29 (AASHTO T 19). In these stan-
cles. Such aggregate particles require an increase in mixing dards, three methods are described for consolidating the
water and thus may affect the strength of concrete, particu- aggregate in the container depending on the maximum
larly in flexure, if the water-cement ratio is not adjusted. size of the aggregate: rodding, jigging, and shoveling. The
A number of automated test machines are available measurement of loose uncompacted void content of fine
for rapid determination of the particle size distribution of aggregate is described in ASTM C 1252.
aggregate. Designed to provide a faster alternative to the
standard sieve analysis test, these machines capture and Relative Density (Specific Gravity) Video
analyze digital images of the aggregate particles to deter-
mine gradation. Fig. 5-11 shows a videograder that meas- The relative density (specific gravity) of an aggregate is the
ures size and shape of an aggregate by using line-scan ratio of its mass to the mass of an equal absolute volume of
87
water. It is used in certain computations for mixture Saturated, Damp

State Ovendry Air dry surface dry or wet
proportioning and control, such as the volume occupied by
the aggregate in the absolute volume method of mix
design. It is not generally used as a measure of aggregate Video
quality, though some porous aggregates that exhibit accel-
erated freeze-thaw deterioration do have low specific grav- Total None Less than Equal to Greater
ities. Most natural aggregates have relative densities moisture: potential potential than
absorption absorption absorption
between 2.4 and 2.9 with corresponding particle (mass)
densities of 2400 and 2900 kg/m3 (150 and 181 lb/ft3). Fig. 5-12. Moisture conditions of aggregate.
Test methods for determining relative densities for
coarse and fine aggregates are described in ASTM C 127
aggregates in order to accurately meet the water require-
(AASHTO T 85) and ASTM C 128 (AASHTO T 84), respec-
ment of the mix design. If the water content of the concrete
tively. The relative density of an aggregate may be deter-
mixture is not kept constant, the water-cement ratio will
mined on an ovendry basis or a saturated surface-dry (SSD)
vary from batch to batch causing other properties, such as
basis. Both the ovendry and saturated surface-dry relative
the compressive strength and workability to vary from
densities may be used in concrete mixture proportioning
batch to batch.
calculations. Ovendry aggregates do not contain any
Coarse and fine aggregate will generally have absorp-
absorbed or free water. They are dried in an oven to con-
tion levels (moisture contents at SSD) in the range of 0.2%
stant weight. Saturated surface-dry aggregates are those in
to 4% and 0.2% to 2%, respectively. Free-water contents will
which the pores in each aggregate particle are filled with
usually range from 0.5% to 2% for coarse aggregate and 2%
water but there is no excess water on the particle surface.
to 6% for fine aggregate. The maximum water content of
drained coarse aggregate is usually less than that of fine
Density aggregate. Most fine aggregates can maintain a maximum
drained moisture content of about 3% to 8% whereas coarse
The density of aggregate particles used in mixture propor- aggregates can maintain only about 1% to 6%.
tioning computations (not including voids between parti-
Bulking. Bulking is the increase in total volume of moist
cles) is determined by multiplying the relative density
fine aggregate over the same mass dry. Surface tension in
(specific gravity) of the aggregate times the density of
the moisture holds the particles apart, causing an increase
water. An approximate value of 1000 kg/m3 (62.4 lb/ft3) is
in volume. Bulking of a fine aggregate (such as sand)
often used for the density of water. The density of aggre-
occurs when it is shoveled or otherwise moved in a damp
gate, along with more accurate values for water density,
condition, even though it may have been fully consoli-
are provided in ASTM C 127 (AASHTO T 85) and ASTM
C 128 (AASHTO T 84). Most natural aggregates have
particle densities of between 2400 and 2900 kg/m3 (150 40
and 181 lb/ft3 ). Fine grading
Absorption and Surface Moisture

Percent increase in volume over dry,
30 Medium
The absorption and surface moisture of aggregates should grading
rodded fine aggregate
be determined according to ASTM C 70, C 127, C 128, and

C 566 (AASHTO T 255) so that the total water content of
the concrete can be controlled and correct batch weights 20
determined. The internal structure of an aggregate particle Coarse
grading
is made up of solid matter and voids that may or may not
contain water.
The moisture conditions of aggregates are shown in
10
Fig. 5-12. They are designated as:
1. Ovendry—fully absorbent
2. Air dry—dry at the particle surface but containing
some interior moisture, thus still somewhat absorbent 0
3. Saturated surface dry (SSD)—neither absorbing water 0 5 10 15 20
from nor contributing water to the concrete mixture Percent of moisture added by mass
to dry, rodded fine aggregate
4. Damp or wet—containing an excess of moisture on
the surface (free water) Fig. 5-13. Surface moisture on fine aggregate can cause
considerable bulking; the amount varies with the amount of
The amount of water added at the concrete batch moisture and the aggregate grading (PCA Major Series 172
plant must be adjusted for the moisture conditions of the and PCA ST20).
88
dated beforehand. Fig. 5-13 illustrates how the amount of with higher porosity values and medium-sized pores (0.1
bulking of fine aggregate varies with moisture content and to 5 µm) that are easily saturated and cause concrete dete-
grading; fine gradings bulk more than coarse gradings for rioration and popouts. Larger pores do not usually be-
a given amount of moisture. Fig. 5-14 shows similar infor- come saturated or cause concrete distress, and water in
mation in terms of weight for a particular fine aggregate. very fine pores may not freeze readily.
Since most fine aggregates are delivered in a damp condi- At any freezing rate, there may be a critical particle size
tion, wide variations can occur in batch quantities if batch- above which a particle will fail if frozen when critically
ing is done by volume. For this reason, good practice has saturated. This critical size is dependent upon the rate of
long favored weighing the aggregate and adjusting for freezing and the porosity, permeability, and tensile strength
moisture content when proportioning concrete. of the particle. For fine-grained aggregates with low perme-
ability (cherts for example), the critical particle size may be
Resistance to Freezing and Thawing within the range of normal aggregate sizes. It is higher for
coarse-grained materials or those with capillary systems
The frost resistance of an aggregate, an important charac- interrupted by numerous macropores (voids too large to
teristic for exterior concrete, is related to its porosity, hold moisture by capillary action). For these aggregates the
absorption, permeability, and pore structure. An aggre- critical particle size may be sufficiently large to be of no
gate particle may absorb so much water (to critical satura- consequence, even though the absorption may be high. If
tion) that it cannot accommodate the expansion and potentially vulnerable aggregates are used in concrete
hydraulic pressure that occurs during the freezing of subjected to periodic drying while in service, they may
water. If enough of the offending particles are present, the never become sufficiently saturated to cause failure.
result can be expansion of the aggregate and possible Cracking of concrete pavements caused by the freeze-
disintegration of the concrete. If a single problem particle thaw deterioration of the aggregate within concrete is
is near the surface of the concrete, it can cause a popout. called D-cracking. This type of cracking has been ob-
Popouts generally appear as conical fragments that break served in some pavements after three or more years of
out of the concrete surface. The offending aggregate parti- service. D-cracked concrete resembles frost-damaged
cle or a part of it is usually found at the bottom of the void. concrete caused by paste deterioration. D-cracks are
Generally it is coarse rather than fine aggregate particles closely spaced crack formations parallel to transverse and
longitudinal joints that later multiply outward from the
joints toward the center of the pavement panel (Fig. 5-15).
D-cracking is a function of the pore properties of certain
Bulking, percent by volume
30
types of aggregate particles and the environment in which
the pavement is placed. Due to the natural accumulation
20
of water under pavements in the base and subbase layers,
10 the aggregate may eventually become saturated. Then
2480
150
2280
140
2080 130
Bulk density, kg/m3
Bulk density, lb/ft3
Mass of fine aggregate and water in one

unit of volume measured loose in air
120
1880
110
1680
100
1480
90
1280 80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Moisture in fine aggregate, percent by mass
Fig. 5-14. Bulk density is compared with the moisture con- Fig. 5-15. D-cracking along a transverse joint caused by
tent for a particular sand (PCA Major Series 172). failure of carbonate coarse aggregate (Stark 1976). (30639)
89
with freezing and thawing cycles, cracking of the concrete ovendried and the percentage of weight loss calculated.
starts in the saturated aggregate (Fig. 5-16) at the bottom Unfortunately, this test is sometimes misleading.
of the slab and progresses upward until it reaches the Aggregates behaving satisfactorily in the test might
wearing surface. This problem can be reduced either by produce concrete with low freeze-thaw resistance;
selecting aggregates that perform better in freeze-thaw conversely, aggregates performing poorly might produce
cycles or, where marginal aggregates must be used, by concrete with adequate resistance. This is attributed, at
reducing the maximum particle size. Also, installation of least in part, to the fact that the aggregates in the test are
effective drainage systems for carrying free water out not confined by cement paste (as they would be in
from under the pavement may be helpful. concrete) and the mechanisms of attack are not the same as
The performance of aggregates under exposure to in freezing and thawing. The test is most reliable for strat-
freezing and thawing can be evaluated in two ways: (1) ified rocks with porous layers or weak bedding planes.
past performance in the field, and (2) laboratory freeze- An additional test that can be used to evaluate aggre-
thaw tests of concrete specimens. If aggregates from the gates for potential D-cracking is the rapid pressure release
same source have previously given satisfactory service method. An aggregate is placed in a pressurized chamber
when used in concrete, they might be considered suitable. and the pressure is rapidly released causing the aggregate
Aggregates not having a service record can be considered with a questionable pore system to fracture (Janssen and
acceptable if they perform satisfactorily in air-entrained Snyder 1994). The amount of fracturing relates to the
concretes subjected to freeze-thaw tests according to potential for D-cracking.
ASTM C 666 (AASHTO T 161). In these tests concrete spe-
cimens made with the aggregate in question are subjected Wetting and Drying Properties
to alternate cycles of freezing and thawing in water.
Deterioration is measured by (1) the reduction in the Weathering due to wetting and drying can also affect the
dynamic modulus of elasticity, (2) linear expansion, and durability of aggregates. The expansion and contraction
(3) weight loss of the specimens. An expansion failure coefficients of rocks vary with temperature and moisture
criterion of 0.035% in 350 freeze-thaw cycles or less is used content. If alternate wetting and drying occurs, severe
by a number of state highway departments to help indi- strain can develop in some aggregates, and with certain
cate whether or not an aggregate is susceptible to D-crack- types of rock this can cause a permanent increase in
ing. Different aggregate types may influence the criteria volume of the concrete and eventual breakdown. Clay
levels and empirical correlations between laboratory lumps and other friable particles can degrade rapidly with
freeze-thaw tests. Field service records should be made to repeated wetting and drying. Popouts can also develop
select the proper criterion (Vogler and Grove 1989). due to the moisture-swelling characteristics of certain
Specifications may require that resistance to weather- aggregates, especially clay balls and shales. While no
ing be demonstrated by a sodium sulfate or magnesium specific tests are available to determine this tendency, an
sulfate test (ASTM C 88 or AASHTO T 104). The test experienced petrographer can often be of assistance in
consists of a number of immersion cycles for a sample of determining this potential for distress.
the aggregate in a sulfate solution; this creates a pressure
through salt-crystal growth in the aggregate pores similar Abrasion and Skid Resistance
to that produced by freezing water. The sample is then
The abrasion resistance of an aggregate is often used as a
general index of its quality. Abrasion resistance is essential
when the aggregate is to be used in concrete subject to
abrasion, as in heavy-duty floors or pavements. Low abra-
sion resistance of an aggregate may increase the quantity
of fines in the concrete during mixing; consequently, this
may increase the water requirement and require an adjust-
ment in the water-cement ratio.
The most common test for abrasion resistance is the
Los Angeles abrasion test (rattler method) performed in
accordance with ASTM C 131 (AASHTO T 96) or ASTM C
535. In this test a specified quantity of aggregate is placed
in a steel drum containing steel balls, the drum is rotated,
and the percentage of material worn away is measured.
Specifications often set an upper limit on this mass loss.
However, a comparison of the results of aggregate abra-
Fig. 5-16. Fractured carbonate aggregate particle as a
source of distress in D-cracking (magnification 2.5X) (Stark sion tests with the abrasion resistance of concrete made
1976). (30639-A) with the same aggregate do not generally show a clear
90
correlation. Mass loss due to impact in the rattler is often 0.14
as much as that due to abrasion. The wear resistance of

concrete is determined more accurately by abrasion tests 0.12
Drying shrinkage after 1 year in percent

of the concrete itself (see Chapter 1).
To provide good skid resistance on pavements, the 0.10
siliceous particle content of the fine aggregate should be at
least 25%. For specification purposes, the siliceous particle 0.08
content is considered equal to the insoluble residue
content after treatment in hydrochloric acid under stan- 0.06
dardized conditions (ASTM D 3042). Certain manufac-
tured sands produce slippery pavement surfaces and
0.04
should be investigated for acceptance before use.
0.02
Strength and Shrinkage
0.00
The strength of an aggregate is rarely tested and generally Sandstone Slate Granite Limestone Quartz
does not influence the strength of conventional concrete as
Fig. 5-17. Concretes containing sandstone or slate produce
much as the strength of the paste and the paste-aggregate
a high shrinkage concrete. Granite, limestone and quartz,
bond. However, aggregate strength does become important are low shrinkage-producing aggregates (ACI 221R).
in high-strength concrete. Aggregate stress levels in concrete
are often much higher than the average stress over the entire
cross section of the concrete. Aggregate tensile strengths
concrete. Siliceous aggregate should be avoided when
range from 2 to 15 MPa (300 to 2300 psi) and compressive
strong solutions of sodium hydroxide are present, as these
strengths from 65 to 270 MPa (10,000 to 40,000 psi).
solutions attack this type of aggregate.
Different aggregate types have different compressibil-
Acid rain (often with a pH of 4 to 4.5) can slightly etch
ity, modulus of elasticity, and moisture-related shrinkage
concrete surfaces, usually without affecting the perform-
characteristics that can influence the same properties in
ance of exposed concrete structures. Extreme acid rain or
concrete. Aggregates with high absorption may have high
strong acid water conditions may warrant special concrete
shrinkage on drying. Quartz and feldspar aggregates,
designs or precautions, especially in submerged areas.
along with limestone, dolomite, and granite, are consid- Continuous replenishment in acid with a pH of less than
ered low shrinkage aggregates; while aggregates with 4 is considered highly aggressive to buried concrete, such
sandstone, shale, slate, hornblende, and graywacke are as pipe (Scanlon 1987). Concrete continuously exposed to
often associated with high shrinkage in concrete (Fig. 5-17). liquid with a pH of less than 3 should be protected in a
manner similar to concrete exposed to dilute acid solu-
Resistance to Acid and tions (ACI 515.1R).
Other Corrosive Substances Natural waters usually have a pH of more than 7 and
seldom less than 6. Waters with a pH greater than 6.5 may
Portland cement concrete is durable in most natural envi- be aggressive if they contain bicarbonates. Carbonic acid
ronments; however, concrete in service is occasionally solutions with concentrations between 0.9 and 3 parts per
exposed to substances that will attack it. million are considered to be destructive to concrete (ACI
Most acidic solutions will slowly or rapidly disinte- 515.1R and Kerkhoff 2001).
grate portland cement concrete depending on the type and A low water-cement ratio, low permeability, and low-
concentration of acid. Certain acids, such as oxalic acid, are to-moderate cement content can increase the acid or corro-
harmless. Weak solutions of some acids have insignificant sion resistance of concrete. A low permeability resulting
effects. Although acids generally attack and leach away the from a low water-cement ratio or the use of silica fume or
calcium compounds of the cement paste, they may not other pozzolans, helps keep the corrosive agent from
readily attack certain aggregates, such as siliceous aggre- penetrating into the concrete. Low-to-moderate cement
gates. Calcareous aggregates often react readily with acids. contents result in less available paste to attack. The use of
However, the sacrificial effect of calcareous aggregates is sacrificial calcareous aggregates should be considered
often a benefit over siliceous aggregate in mild acid expo- where indicated.
sures or in areas where water is not flowing. With calcare- Certain acids, gases, salts, and other substances that
ous aggregate, the acid attacks the entire exposed concrete are not mentioned here also can disintegrate concrete.
surface uniformly, reducing the rate of attack on the paste Acids and other chemicals that severely attack portland
and preventing loss of aggregate particles at the surface. cement concrete should be prevented from coming in
Calcareous aggregates also tend to neutralize the acid, contact with the concrete by using protective coatings
especially in stagnant locations. Acids can also discolor (Kerkhoff 2001).
91
Fire Resistance and Thermal Properties Table 5-6. Harmful Materials in Aggregates
Effect on Test
The fire resistance and thermal properties of concrete— Substances concrete designation
conductivity, diffusivity, and coefficient of thermal expan- Organic Affects setting ASTM C 40 (AASHTO T 21)
sion—depend to some extent on the mineral constituents impurities and hardening, ASTM C 87 (AASHTO T 71)
of the aggregates used. Manufactured and some naturally may cause
occurring lightweight aggregates are more fire resistant deterioration
than normal-weight aggregates due to their insulating Materials finer Affects bond, ASTM C 117 (AASHTO T 11)
than the 75-µm increases water
properties and high-temperature stability. Concrete
(No. 200) sieve requirement
containing a calcareous coarse aggregate performs better
Coal, lignite, Affects durability, ASTM C 123 (AASHTO T 113)
under fire exposure than a concrete containing quartz or or other may cause
siliceous aggregate such as granite or quartzite. At about lightweight stains and
590°C (1060°F), quartz expands 0.85% causing disruptive materials popouts
expansion (ACI 216 and ACI 221). The coefficient of ther- Soft particles Affects durability ASTM C 235
mal expansion of aggregates ranges from 0.55 x 10-6 per °C Clay lumps Affects work- ASTM C 142 (AASHTO T 112)
to 5 x 10-6 per °C (1 x 10-6 per °F to 9 x 10-6 per °F). For and friable ability and
more information refer to Chapter 15 for temperature- particles durability, may
cause popouts
induced volume changes and to Chapter 18 for thermal
conductivity and mass concrete considerations. Chert of less Affects ASTM C 123 (AASHTO T 113)
than 2.40 durability, may ASTM C 295
relative density cause popouts
Alkali-reactive Causes ASTM C 227
POTENTIALLY HARMFUL MATERIALS aggregates abnormal ASTM C 289
expansion, ASTM C 295
Harmful substances that may be present in aggregates map cracking, ASTM C 342
include organic impurities, silt, clay, shale, iron oxide, coal, and popouts ASTM C 586
lignite, and certain lightweight and soft particles (Table ASTM C 1260 (AASHTO T 303)
5-6). In addition, rocks and minerals such as some cherts, ASTM C 1293
strained quartz (Buck and Mather 1984), and certain dolo-
mitic limestones are alkali reactive (see Table 5-7). Gypsum
and anhydrite may cause sulfate attack. Certain aggre-
gates, such as some shales, will cause popouts by swelling Table 5-7. Some Potentially Harmful Reactive
(simply by absorbing water) or by freezing of absorbed Minerals, Rock, and Synthetic Materials
water (Fig. 5-18). Most specifications limit the permissible
amounts of these substances. The performance history of Alkali-carbonate
Alkali-silica reactive substances* reactive substances**
an aggregate should be a determining factor in setting the
limits for harmful substances. Test methods for detecting Andesites Opal Calcitic dolomites
Argillites Opaline shales Dolomitic limestones
harmful substances qualitatively or quantitatively are
Certain siliceous Phylites Fine-grained dolomites
listed in Table 5-6.
limestones Quartzites
Aggregates are potentially harmful if they contain and dolomites Quartzoses
compounds known to react chemically with portland Chalcedonic cherts Cherts
cement concrete and produce any of the following: (1) Chalcedony Rhyolites
significant volume changes of the paste, aggregates, or Cristobalite Schists
both; (2) interference with the normal hydration of Dacites Siliceous shales
cement; and (3) otherwise harmful byproducts. Glassy or Strained quartz
Organic impurities may delay setting and hardening cryptocrystalline and certain
Video volcanics other forms
of concrete, may reduce strength gain, and in unusual
Granite gneiss of quartz
cases may cause deterioration. Organic impurities such as
Graywackes Synthetic and
peat, humus, and organic loam may not be as detrimental
Metagraywackes natural silicious
but should be avoided. glass
Video Materials finer than the 75-µm (No. 200) sieve, espe- Tridymite
cially silt and clay, may be present as loose dust and may
form a coating on the aggregate particles. Even thin coat- * Several of the rocks listed (granite gneiss and certain quartz for-
mations for example) react very slowly and may not show evi-
ings of silt or clay on gravel particles can be harmful dence of any harmful degree of reactivity until the concrete is over
because they may weaken the bond between the cement 20 years old.
** Only certain sources of these materials have shown reactivity.
paste and aggregate. If certain types of silt or clay are pres-
ent in excessive amounts, water requirements may
increase significantly.
92
placed in the lime slurry,

there is little likelihood of
any reaction taking place in
concrete. These tests should
be required when aggregates
with no record of successful
prior use are used in archi-
tectural concrete.
ALKALI-AGGREGATE
REACTIVITY
Fig. 5-19. Iron oxide stain
Aggregates containing certain caused by impurities in the
constituents can react with coarse aggregate. (70024)
Fig. 5-18. A popout is the breaking away of a small frag- alkali hydroxides in concrete.
ment of concrete surface due to internal pressure that
The reactivity is potentially
leaves a shallow, typically conical depression. (113)
harmful only when it produces significant expansion
(Mather 1975). This alkali-aggregate reactivity (AAR) has
There is a tendency for some fine aggregates to two forms—alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and alkali-carbonate
degrade from the grinding action in a concrete mixer; this reaction (ACR). ASR is of more concern than ACR because
effect, which is measured using ASTM C 1137, may alter the occurrence of aggregates containing reactive silica
mixing water, entrained air and slump requirements. minerals is more common. Alkali-reactive carbonate aggre-
Coal or lignite, or other low-density materials such as gates have a specific composition that is not very common.
Video Alkali-silica reactivity has been recognized as a poten-
wood or fibrous materials, in excessive amounts will affect
tial source of distress in concrete since the late 1930s
the durability of concrete. If these impurities occur at or
(Stanton 1940 and PCA 1940). Even though potentially
near the surface, they might disintegrate, pop out, or
reactive aggregates exist throughout North America, ASR
cause stains. Potentially harmful chert in coarse aggregate
distress in structural concrete is not common. There are a
can be identified by using ASTM C 123 (AASHTO T 113).
number of reasons for this:
Video Soft particles in coarse aggregate are especially objec-
tionable because they cause popouts and can affect dura- • Most aggregates are chemically stable in hydraulic-
bility and wear resistance of concrete. If friable, they could cement concrete.
break up during mixing and thereby increase the amount • Aggregates with good service records are abundant in
of water required. Where abrasion resistance is critical, many areas.
such as in heavy-duty industrial floors, testing may indi- • Most concrete in service is dry enough to inhibit ASR.
cate that further investigation or another aggregate source • Use of certain pozzolans or slags can control ASR.
is warranted. • In many concrete mixtures, the alkali content of the
Clay lumps present in concrete may absorb some of concrete is low enough to control harmful ASR.
• Some forms of ASR do not produce significant delete-
the mixing water, cause popouts in hardened concrete,
rious expansion.
and affect durability and wear resistance. They can also
break up during mixing and thereby increase the mixing- To reduce ASR potential requires understanding the
water demand. ASR mechanism; properly using tests to identify poten-
Aggregates can occasionally contain particles of iron tially reactive aggregates; and, if needed, taking steps to
oxide and iron sulfide that result in unsightly stains on minimize the potential for expansion and related cracking.
exposed concrete surfaces (Fig. 5-19). The aggregate
should meet the staining requirements of ASTM C 330
(AASHTO M 195) when tested according to ASTM C 641;
Alkali-Silica Reaction
the quarry face and aggregate stockpiles should not show Visual Symptoms of Expansive ASR. Typical indicators
evidence of staining. of ASR might be any of the following: a network of cracks
As an additional aid in identifying staining particles, (Fig. 5-20); closed or spalled joints; relative displacements
the aggregate can be immersed in a lime slurry. If staining of different parts of a structure; or fragments breaking out
particles are present, a blue-green gelatinous precipitate of the surface of the concrete (popouts) (Fig. 5-21). Because
will form within 5 to 10 minutes; this will rapidly change ASR deterioration is slow, the risk of catastrophic failure is
to a brown color on exposure to air and light. The reaction low. However, ASR can cause serviceability problems and
should be complete within 30 minutes. If no brown gelat- can exacerbate other deterioration mechanisms such as
inous precipitate is formed when a suspect aggregate is those that occur in frost, deicer, or sulfate exposures.
93
Mechanism of ASR. The alkali-silica reaction forms a gel

that swells as it draws water from the surrounding cement
paste. Reaction products from ASR have a great affinity
for moisture. In absorbing water, these gels can induce
pressure, expansion, and cracking of the aggregate and
surrounding paste. The reaction can be visualized as a
two-step process:
1. Alkali hydroxide + reactive silica gel → reaction prod-
uct (alkali-silica gel)
2. Gel reaction product + moisture → expansion
The amount of gel formed in the concrete depends on
the amount and type of silica and alkali hydroxide
concentration. The presence of gel does not always coin-
cide with distress, and thus, gel presence does not neces-
sarily indicate destructive ASR.
Factors Affecting ASR. For alkali-silica reaction to occur,
the following three conditions must be present:
1. reactive forms of silica in the aggregate,
2. high-alkali (pH) pore solution, and
3. sufficient moisture.
If one of these conditions is absent, ASR cannot occur.
Test Methods for Identifying ASR Distress. It is impor-
tant to distinguish between the reaction and damage
resulting from the reaction. In the diagnosis of concrete
deterioration, it is most likely that a gel product will be
identified. But, in some cases significant amounts of gel are
formed without causing damage to concrete. To pinpoint
ASR as the cause of damage, the presence of deleterious
ASR gel must be verified. A site of expansive reaction can
be defined as an aggregate particle that is recognizably
reactive or potentially reactive and is at least partially
replaced by gel. Gel can be present in cracks and voids and
Fig. 5-20 (top and bottom). Cracking of concrete from alkali-
silica reactivity. (69549, 58352) may also be present in a ring surrounding an aggregate
particle at its edges. A network of internal cracks connect-
ing reacted aggregate particles is an almost certain indica-
tion that ASR is responsible for cracking. A petrographic
examination (ASTM C 856) is the most positive method for
identifying ASR gel in concrete (Powers 1999).
Petrography, when used to study a known reacted
concrete, can confirm the presence of reaction products
and verify ASR as an underlying cause of deterioration
(Fig. 5-22).
Control of ASR in New Concrete. The best way to avoid
ASR is to take appropriate precautions before concrete is
placed. Standard concrete specifications may require
modifications to address ASR. These modifications should
be carefully tailored to avoid limiting the concrete pro-
ducer’s options. This permits careful analysis of cementi-
tious materials and aggregates and choosing a control
strategy that optimizes effectiveness and the economic
selection of materials. If the aggregate is not reactive by
Fig. 5-21. Popouts caused by ASR of sand-sized particles. historical identification or testing, no special requirements
Inset shows closeup of a popout. (51117, 51118) are needed.
94
0.3
Identification of Potentially Reactive Aggregates. Field Sudbury aggregate
performance history is the best method of evaluating the
susceptibility of an aggregate to ASR. For the most defini- 0.25
tive evaluation, the existing concrete should have been in
service for at least 15 years. Comparisons should be made 0.10% expansion limit for evaluating
14-Day expansion, %
0.2
effectiveness of supplementary
between the existing and proposed concrete’s mix propor- cementitious materials against AAR
tions, ingredients, and service environments. This process
0.15
should tell whether special requirements are needed, are
not needed, or whether testing of the aggregate or job
concrete is required. The use of newer, faster test methods 0.1
can be utilized for initial screening. Where uncertainties
arise, lengthier tests can be used to confirm results. Table 0.05
5-8 describes different test methods used to evaluate
potential alkali-silica reactivity. These tests should not be
0
used to disqualify use of potentially reactive aggregates,
20 30 56 35 50 65 7.5 10 12.5
as reactive aggregates can be safely used with the careful Control % Fly ash % Slag % Silica fume
selection of cementitious materials as discussed below.
Fig. 5-23. Influence of different amounts of fly ash, slag,
Materials and Methods to Control ASR. The most effec- and silica fume by mass of cementing material on mortar
tive way of controlling expansion due to ASR is to design bar expansion (ASTM C 1260) after 14 days when using
mixtures specifically to control ASR, preferably using reactive aggregate (Fournier 1997).
locally available materials. The following options are not
listed in priority order and, although usually not neces-
sary, they can be used in combination with one another.
In North America, current practices include the use of ness must be determined by tests such as ASTM C 1260
a supplementary cementitious material or blended cement (modified) or C 1293. Where applicable, different amounts
proven by testing to control ASR or limiting the alkali of pozzolan or slag should be tested to determine the opti-
content of the concrete. Supplementary cementitious mate- mum dosage. Expansion usually decreases as the dosage
rials include fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, of the pozzolan or slag increases (see Fig. 5-23). Lithium-
silica fume, and natural pozzolans. Blended cements use based admixtures are also available to control ASR. Lime-
slag, fly ash, silica fume, and natural pozzolans to control stone sweetening (the popular term for replacing
ASR. Low-alkali portland cement (ASTM C 150) with an approximately 30% of the reactive sand-gravel aggregate
alkali content of not more than 0.60% (equivalent sodium with crushed limestone) is effective in controlling deterio-
oxide) can be used to control ASR. Its use has been success- ration in some sand-gravel aggregate concretes. See
ful with slightly reactive to moderately reactive aggre- AASHTO (2001), Farny and Kosmatka (1997), and PCA
gates. However, low-alkali cements are not available in all (1998) for more information on tests to demonstrate the
areas. Thus, the use of locally available cements in combi- effectiveness of the above control measures.
nation with pozzolans, slags, or blended cements is prefer-
able for controlling ASR. When pozzolans, slags, or
Alkali-Carbonate Reaction
blended cements are used to control ASR, their effective-
Mechanism of ACR. Reactions observed with certain
dolomitic rocks are associated with alkali-carbonate reac-
tion (ACR). Reactive rocks usually contain large crystals of
dolomite scattered in and surrounded by a fine-grained
matrix of calcite and clay. Calcite is one of the mineral
forms of calcium carbonate; dolomite is the common
name for calcium-magnesium carbonate. ACR is relatively
rare because aggregates susceptible to this reaction are
usually unsuitable for use in concrete for other reasons,
such as strength potential. Argillaceous dolomitic lime-
stone contains calcite and dolomite with appreciable
amounts of clay and can contain small amounts of reactive
silica. Alkali reactivity of carbonate rocks is not usually
dependent upon its clay mineral composition (Hadley
1961). Aggregates have potential for expansive ACR if the
Fig. 5-22. Polished section view of an alkali reactive aggregate
in concrete. Observe the alkali-silica reaction rim around the following lithological characteristics exist (Ozol 1994 and
reactive aggregate and the crack formation. (43090) Swenson 1967):
95
Table 5-8. Test Methods for Alkali-Silica Reactivity (Farny and Kosmatka 1997)
Test name Purpose Type of test Type of sample
ASTM C 227, To test the susceptibility of Mortar bars stored over At least 4 mortar bars of
Potential alkali-reactivity cement-aggregate com- water at 37.8°C (100°F) standard dimensions:
of cement-aggregate binations to expansive and high relative 25 x 25 x 285 mm
combinations reactions involving humidity (1 x 1 x 111⁄4 in.)
(mortar-bar method) alkalies
ASTM C 289, To determine potential Sample reacted with Three 25-gram samples
Potential alkali-silica reactivity of siliceous alkaline solution at 80°C (176°F) of crushed and sieved
reactivity of aggregates aggregates aggregate
(chemical method)
ASTM C 294, To give descriptive Visual identification Varies, but should be

Constituents of nomenclature for the representative of entire
natural mineral more common or impor- source
aggregates tant natural minerals—an
aid in determining their
performance
ASTM C 295, To outline petrographic Visual and microscopic Varies with knowledge of
Petrographic examination procedures examination of prepared quarry: cores 53 to 100 mm
examination of for aggregates—an aid in samples—sieve analysis, in diameter (21⁄8 to 4 in.)
aggregates determining their per- microscopy, scratch or 45 kg (100 lb) or 300
for concrete formance acid tests pieces, or 2 kg (4 lb)
ASTM C 342, To determine the poten- Mortar bars stored in Three mortar bars per
Potential volume tial ASR expansion of water at 23°C (73.4°F) cement-aggregate
change of cement- cement-aggregate combination of standard
aggregate combinations dimensions: 25 x 25 x 285 mm
combinations (1 x 1 x 111⁄4 in.)
ASTM C 441, To determine effectiveness Mortar bars—using Pyrex At least 3 mortar bars
Effectiveness of mineral of supplementary cementing glass as aggregate— and also 3 mortar bars
admixtures or GBFS in materials in controlling stored over water at of control mixture
preventing excessive expansion from ASR 37.8°C (100°F) and
expansion of concrete high relative humidity
due to alkali-silica reaction
ASTM C 856, To outline petrographic Visual (unmagnified) At least one 150-mm
Petrographic examination procedures and microscopic exam- diameter by 300-mm long
examination of for hardened concrete— ination of prepared core (6-in. diameter by
hardened concrete useful in determining samples 12-in. long)
condition or performance
ASTM C 856 To identify products of Staining of a freshly- Varies: core with lapped
(AASHTO T 299), ASR in hardened exposed concrete surface, core with
Annex uranyl-acetate concrete surface and viewing broken surface
treatment procedure under UV light
Los Alamos staining To identify products of Staining of a freshly-exposed Varies: core with lapped
method ASR in hardened concrete surface with two surface, core with
(Powers 1999) concrete different reagents broken surface
ASTM C 1260 To test the potential for Immersion of mortar At least 3 mortar bars
(AASHTO T 303), deleterious alkali-silica bars in alkaline
Potential alkali-reactivity reaction of aggregate solution at 80°C (176°F)
of aggregates (mortar- in mortar bars
bar method)
ASTM C 1293, To determine the Concrete prisms stored Three prisms per cement-
Determination of length potential ASR expansion over water at 38°C (100.4°F) aggregate combination of
change of concrete of cement-aggregate standard dimensions:
due to alkali-silica combinations 75 x 75 x 285 mm
reaction (concrete (3 x 3 x 111⁄4 in.)
prism test)
Accelerated concrete To determine the Concrete prisms stored Three prisms per cement-
prism test (modified potential ASR expansion stored over water aggregate combination of
ASTM C 1293) of cement-aggregate at 60°C (140°F) standard dimensions:
combinations 75 x 75 x 285 mm
(3 x 3 x 111⁄4 in.)
96
Duration of test Measurement Criteria Comments

Varies: first measure- Length change Per ASTM C 33, maximum Test may not produce signif-
ment at 14 days, then 1,2, 0.10% expansion at 6 months, icant expansion, especially
3,4,6,9, and 12 months; or if not available for a 6- for carbonate aggregate.
every 6 months after month period, maximum of Long test duration.
that as necessary 0.05% at 3 months Expansions may not be
from AAR.
24 hours Drop in alkalinity Point plotted on graph falls Quick results.
and amount of in deleterious or potentially Some aggregates give low
silica solubilized deleterious area expansions even though
they have high silica content.
Not reliable.
Short duration—as long Description of type Not applicable These descriptions are used
as it takes to visually and proportion of to characterize naturally-
examine the sample minerals in aggregate occurring minerals that make
up common aggregate
sources.
Short duration—visual Particle character- Not applicable Usually includes optical

examination does not istics, such as shape, microscopy. Also may include
involve long test size, texture, color, XRD analysis, differential
periods mineral composition, thermal analysis, or infrared
and physical condition spectroscopy—see ASTM C 294
for descriptive nomenclature.
52 weeks Length change Per ASTM C 33, unsatis- Primarily used for aggregates
factory aggregate if expan- from Oklahoma, Kansas,
sion equals or exceeds Nebraska, and Iowa.
0.200% at 1 year
Varies: first measure- Length change Per ASTM C 989, minimum Highly reactive artificial
ment at 14 days, then 1,2, 75% reduction in expansion aggregate may not represent
3,4,5,9, and 12 months; or 0.020% maximum expan- real aggregate conditions.
every 6 months after sion or per ASTM C 618, com- Pyrex contains alkalies.
that as necessary parison against low-alkali
control
Short duration—includes Is the aggregate known See measurement—this Specimens can be examined
preparation of samples to be reactive? examination determines with stereomicroscopes,
and visual and micro- Orientation and if ASR reactions have polarizing microscopes,
scope examination geometry of cracks. taken place and their metallographic microscopes,
Is there any gel effects upon the concrete. and scanning electron
present? Used in conjunction with microscope.
other tests.
Immediate results Intensity of Lack of fluorescence Identifies small amounts of
fluorescence ASR gel whether they cause
expansion or not.
Opal, a natural aggregate,
and carbonated paste can
Immediate results Color of stain Dark pink stain corresponds glow—interpret results
to ASR gel and indicates an accordingly.
advanced state of Tests must be supplemented
degradation by petrographic examination
and physical tests for deter-
mining concrete expansion.
16 days Length change If greater than 0.10%, Very fast alternative to C 227.
go to supplementary test Useful for slowly reacting
procedures; if greater than aggregates or those that
0.20%, indicative of poten- produce expansion late in
tial deleterious expansion the reaction.
Varies: first measure- Length change Per Appendix X1, potentially Requires long test duration
ment at 7 days, then 28 deleteriously reactive if ex- for meaningful results.
and 56 days, then 3,6,9, pansion equals or exceeds Use as a supplement to C 227,
and 12 months; every 0.04% at one year C 295, C 289, and C 1260.
6 months as after that as Similar to CSA A23.2-14A.
necessary
3 month (91 days) Length change Potentially deleteriously Fast alternative to C 227.
reactive if expansion Good correlation to ASTM
equals or exceeds 0.04% C 227 for carbonate and
at 91 days sedimentary rocks.
97
• clay content, or insoluble residue content, in the range minerals and water proportioned to have a relative density
of 5% to 25%; (specific gravity) less than that of the desirable aggregate
• calcite-to-dolomite ratio of approximately 1:1; particles but greater than that of the deleterious particles.
• increase in the dolomite volume up to a point at The heavier particles sink to the bottom while the lighter
which interlocking texture becomes a restraining particles float to the surface. This process can be used when
factor; and acceptable and harmful particles have distinguishable rela-
• small size of the discrete dolomite crystals (rhombs) tive densities.
suspended in a clay matrix. Jigging separates particles with small differences in
density by pulsating water current. Upward pulsations of
Dedolomitization. Dedolomitization, or the breaking water through a jig (a box with a perforated bottom) move
down of dolomite, is normally associated with expansive the lighter material into a layer on top of the heavier mate-
ACR (Hadley 1961). Concrete that contains dolomite and rial; the top layer is then removed.
has expanded also contains brucite (magnesium hydrox- Rising-current classification separates particles with
ide, Mg(OH)2), which is formed by dedolomitization. De- large differences in density. Light materials, such as wood
dolomitization proceeds according to the following and lignite, are floated away in a rapidly upward moving
equation (Ozol 1994): stream of water.
CaMgCO3 (dolomite) + alkali hydroxide solution → Crushing is also used to remove soft and friable parti-
MgOH2 (brucite) + CaCO3 (calcium carbonate) + cles from coarse aggregates. This process is sometimes the
K2CO3 (potassium carbonate) + alkali hydroxide only means of making material suitable for use. Unfortun-
The dedolomitization reaction and subsequent crystalliza- ately, with any process some acceptable material is always
tion of brucite may cause considerable expansion. lost and removal of all harmful particles may be difficult
Whether dedolomitization causes expansion directly or or expensive.
indirectly, it’s usually a prerequisite to other expansive
processes (Tang, Deng, Lon, and Han 1994).
HANDLING AND STORING AGGREGATES
Test Methods for Identifying ACR Distress. The three
test methods commonly used to identify potentially alkali- Aggregates should be handled and stored in a way that
carbonate reactive aggregate are: minimizes segregation and degradation and prevents
• petrographic examination (ASTM C 295); contamination by deleterious substances (Fig. 5-24). Stock-
• rock cylinder method (ASTM C 586); and piles should be built up in thin layers of uniform thickness
• concrete prism test (ASTM C 1105). to minimize segregation. The most economical and
acceptable method of forming aggregate stockpiles is the
See Farny and Kosmatka (1997) for detailed information. truck-dump method, which discharges the loads in a way
Materials and Methods to Control ACR. ACR-suscepti- that keeps them tightly joined. The aggregate is then re-
ble aggregate has a specific composition that is readily claimed with a front-end loader. The loader should re-
identified by petrographic testing. If a rock indicates ACR- move slices from the edges of the pile from bottom to top
susceptibility, one of the following preventive measures so that every slice will contain a portion of each horizon-
should be taken: tal layer.
• selective quarrying to completely avoid reactive ag-
gregate;
• blend aggregate according to Appendix in ASTM C
1105; or Video
• limit aggregate size to smallest practical.
Low-alkali cement and pozzolans are generally not very
effective in controlling expansive ACR.
Video AGGREGATE BENEFICIATION

Aggregate processing consists of: (1) basic processing—
crushing, screening, and washing—to obtain proper grada-
tion and cleanliness; and (2) beneficiation—upgrading
quality by processing methods such as heavy media sepa-
ration, jigging, rising-current classification, and crushing.
In heavy media separation, aggregates are passed
through a heavy liquid comprised of finely ground heavy Fig. 5-24. Stockpile of aggregate at a ready mix plant. (69552)
98
When aggregates are not delivered by truck, accept- Seashells may be present in the aggregate source.
able and inexpensive results can be obtained by forming These shells are a hard material that can produce good
the stockpile in layers with a clamshell bucket (cast-and- quality concrete, however, a higher cement content may
spread method); in the case of aggregates not subject to be required. Also, due to the angularity of the shells, addi-
degradation, spreading the aggregates with a rubber-tire tional cement paste is required to obtain the desired work-
dozer and reclaiming with a front-end loader can be used. ability. Aggregate containing complete shells (uncrushed)
By spreading the material in thin layers, segregation is should be avoided as their presence may result in voids in
minimized. Whether aggregates are handled by truck, the concrete and lower the compressive strength.
bucket loader, clamshell, or conveyor belt, stockpiles Marine-dredged aggregates often contain salt from the
should not be built up in high, cone-shaped piles since this seawater. The primary salts are sodium chloride and
results in segregation. However, if circumstances necessi- magnesium sulfate and the amount of salt on the aggregate
tate construction of a conical pile, or if a stockpile has is often not more than about 1% of the mass of the mixing
segregated, gradation variations can be minimized when water. The highest salt content occurs in sands located just
the pile is reclaimed; in such cases aggregates should be above the high-tide level. Use of these aggregates with
loaded by continually moving around the circumference drinkable mix water often contributes less salt to the
of the pile to blend sizes rather than by starting on one mixture than the use of seawater (as mix water) with salt-
side and working straight through the pile. free aggregates.
Crushed aggregates segregate less than rounded Marine aggregates can be an appreciable source of
(gravel) aggregates and larger-size aggregates segregate chlorides. The presence of these chlorides may affect the
more than smaller sizes. To avoid segregation of coarse concrete by (1) altering the time of set, (2) increasing drying
shrinkage, (3) significantly increasing the risk of corrosion
aggregates, size fractions can be stockpiled and batched
of steel reinforcement, and (4) causing efflorescence.
separately. Proper stockpiling procedures, however,
Generally, marine aggregates containing large amounts of
should eliminate the need for this. Specifications provide
chloride should not be used in reinforced concrete.
a range in the amount of material permitted in any size
Marine-dredged aggregates can be washed with fresh
fraction partly because of segregation in stockpiling and
water to reduce the salt content. There is no maximum
batching operations.
limit on the salt content of coarse or fine aggregate;
Washed aggregates should be stockpiled in sufficient
however, the chloride limits presented in Chapter 9
time before use so that they can drain to a uniform mois-
should be followed.
ture content. Damp fine material has less tendency to
segregate than dry material. When dry fine aggregate is
dropped from buckets or conveyors, wind can blow away RECYCLED-CONCRETE AGGREGATE
the fines; this should be avoided if possible.
Bulkheads or dividers should be used to avoid In recent years, the concept of using old concrete pave-
contamination of aggregate stockpiles. Partitions between ments, buildings, and other structures as a source of aggre-
stockpiles should be high enough to prevent intermingling gate has been demonstrated on several projects, resulting
of materials. Storage bins should be circular or nearly in both material and energy savings (ECCO 1999). The
square. Their bottoms should slope not less than 50 procedure involves (1) breaking up and removing the old
degrees from the horizontal on all sides to a center outlet. concrete, (2) crushing in primary and secondary crushers
When loading the bin, the material should fall vertically (Fig. 5-25), (3) removing reinforcing steel and other embed-
over the outlet into the bin. Chuting the material into a bin
at an angle and against the bin sides will cause segregation.
Baffle plates or dividers will help minimize segregation.
Bins should be kept as full as possible since this reduces
breakage of aggregate particles and the tendency to segre-
gate. Recommended methods of handling and storing
aggregates are discussed at length in Matthews (1965 to
1967), NCHRP (1967), and Bureau of Reclamation (1981).
MARINE-DREDGED AGGREGATE
Marine-dredged aggregate from tidal estuaries and sand
and gravel from the seashore can be used with caution in
some concrete applications when other aggregate sources
are not available. Aggregates obtained from seabeds have Fig. 5-25. Heavily reinforced concrete is crushed with a
two problems: (1) seashells and (2) salt. beamcrusher. (69779)
99
ded items, (4) grading and washing, and (5) finally stock- 12
piling the resulting coarse and fine aggregate (Fig. 5-26).
Dirt, gypsum board, wood, and other foreign materials 10
Water absorption in % by mass

should be prevented from contaminating the final product.
Recycled concrete is simply old concrete that has been 8
crushed to produce aggregate. Recycled-concrete aggre-
gate is primarily used in pavement reconstruction. It has 6
been satisfactorily used as an aggregate in granular
subbases, lean-concrete subbases, soil-cement, and in new 4
concrete as the only source of aggregate or as a partial
replacement of new aggregate. 2
Recycled-concrete aggregate generally has a higher
absorption and a lower specific gravity than conventional 0
150 µm to 2.36 mm to 4.75 mm to 2.36 mm to 2.36 mm to
aggregate. This results from the high absorption of porous 4.75 mm 9.5 mm 19 mm 9.5 mm 9.5 mm
mortar and hardened cement paste within the recycled (No. 100 to (No. 8 to (No. 4 to (No. 8 to (No. 8 to
concrete aggregate. Absorption values typically range No. 4) 3/8 in.) 3/4 in.) 3/8 in.) 3/8 in.)
from 3% to 10%, depending on the concrete being recy- Recycled Natural Lightweight
cled; this absorption lies between those values for natural Aggregate size
and lightweight aggregate. The values increase as coarse Fig. 5-27. Comparison of water absorption of three different
particle size decreases (Fig. 5-27). The high absorption of recycled aggregate particle sizes and one size of natural and
the recycled aggregate makes it necessary to add more lightweight coarse aggregate. (Kerkhoff and Siebel 2001)
water to achieve the same workability and slump than for
concrete with conventional aggregates. Dry recycled
aggregate absorbs water during and after mixing. To
avoid this, recycled aggregate should be prewetted or adequate compressive strength. The use of recycled fine
stockpiles should be kept moist. aggregate can result in minor compressive strength reduc-
The particle shape of recycled-concrete aggregate is tions. However, drying shrinkage and creep of concrete
similar to crushed rock as shown in Fig. 5-28. The relative made with recycled aggregates is up to 100% higher than
density decreases progressively as particle size decreases. concrete with a corresponding conventional aggregate.
The sulfate content of recycled-concrete aggregate should This is due to the large amount of old cement paste and
be determined to assess the possibility of deleterious mortar especially in the fine aggregate. Therefore, consid-
sulfate reactivity. The chloride content should also be erably lower values of drying shrinkage can be achieved
determined where applicable. using recycled coarse aggregate with natural sand
New concrete made from recycled-concrete aggregate (Kerkhoff and Siebel 2001). As with any new aggregate
generally has good durability. Carbonation, permeability, source, recycled-concrete aggregate should be tested for
and resistance to freeze-thaw action have been found to be durability, gradation, and other properties.
the same or even better than concrete with conventional Recycled concrete used as coarse aggregate in new
aggregates. Concrete made with recycled coarse aggre- concrete possesses some potential for alkali-silica-reaction
gates and conventional fine aggregate can obtain an if the old concrete contained alkali-reactive aggregate. The
Fig. 5-26. Stockpile of recycled-concrete aggregate. (69813) Fig. 5-28. Recycled-concrete aggregate. (69812)
100
alkali content of the cement used in the old concrete has Barksdale, Richard D., The Aggregate Handbook, National
little effect on expansion due to alkali-silica-reaction. For Stone Association, Washington D.C., 1991.
highly reactive aggregates made from recycled concrete,
special measures discussed under “Alkali-Silica Reaction” Bérubé, M. A.; Fournier, B.; and Durant, B., Alkali-Aggre-
should be used to control ASR. Also, even if expansive gate Reaction in Concrete, 11th International Conference,
ASR did not develop in the original concrete, it can not be Québec City, Canada, June 2000.
assumed that it will not develop in the new concrete if Bhatty, Muhammad S. Y., “Mechanism of Pozzolanic
special control measures are not taken. Petrographic Reactions and Control of Alkali-Aggregate Expansion,”
examination and expansion tests are recommended to Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, American Society for
make this judgment (Stark 1996). Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
Concrete trial mixtures should be made to check the Winter 1985.
new concrete’s quality and to determine the proper
mixture proportions. One potential problem with using Brown, L. S., Some Observations on the Mechanics of Alkali-
recycled concrete is the variability in the properties of the Aggregate Reaction, Research Department Bulletin RX054,
old concrete that may in turn affect the properties of the Portland Cement Association, http://www.portcement.
new concrete. This can partially be avoided by frequent org/pdf_files/RX054.pdf, 1955.
monitoring of the properties of the old concrete that is Buck, Alan D., “Recycled Concrete as a Source of
being recycled. Adjustments in the mixture proportions Aggregate,” ACI Journal, American Concrete Institute,
may then be needed. Farmington Hills, Michigan, May 1977, pages 212 to 219.
Buck, Alan D., and Mather, Katharine, Reactivity of Quartz
REFERENCES at Normal Temperatures, Technical Report SL-84-12,
Structures Laboratory, Waterways Experiment Station,
AASHTO, Guide Specification For Highway Construction U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi,
SECTION 56X Portland Cement Concrete Resistant to Ex- July 1984.
cessive Expansion Caused by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Appendix
Buck, Alan D.; Mather, Katharine; and Mather, Bryant,
F to ASR Transition Plan), http://leadstates.tamu.edu
Cement Composition and Concrete Durability in Sea Water,
/ASR/library/gspec.stm, 2001.
Technical Report SL-84-21, Structures Laboratory, Water-
Abrams, D. A., Design of Concrete Mixtures, Lewis Institute, ways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Structural Materials Research Laboratory, Bulletin No. 1, Vicksburg, Mississippi, December 1984.
PCA as LS001, Chicago, http://www.portcement.org/
Bureau of Reclamation, Concrete Manual, 8th ed., U.S.
pdf_files/LS001.pdf, 1918, 20 pages.
Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, 1981.
ACI Committee 116, Cement and Concrete Technology, ACI
Crouch, L. K.; Sauter, Heather J.; and Williams, Jakob A.,
116R-00, ACI Committee 116 Report, American Concrete
“92-Mpa Air-entrained HPC,” TRB-Record 1698, Concrete
Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2000, 73 pages.
2000, page 24.
ACI Committee 201, Guide to Durable Concrete, ACI 201.2R-
ECCO (Environmental Council of Concrete Organizations),
92, reapproved 1997, American Concrete Institute, Farm-
“Recycling Concrete and Masonry,” EV 22, Skokie, Illinois,
ington Hills, Michigan, 1992.
http://www.ecco.org/pdfs/ev22.pdf, 1999, 12 pages.
ACI Committee 216, Guide for Determining the Fire Endur-
ance of Concrete Elements, ACI 216R-89, reapproved 1994, EPA, Acid Rain, Research Summary, EPA-600/8-79-028, U.S.
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michi- Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.,
gan, 1989. October 1979.
ACI Committee 221, Guide for Use of Normal Weight Aggre- EPA, Final Report, U.S. EPA Workshop on Acid Deposition
gates in Concrete, ACI 221R-96, American Concrete Insti- Effects on Portland Cement Concrete and Related Materials,
tute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 1996. Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory, U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
ACI Committee 221, Guide to Alkali Aggregate Reactions, Carolina, February 1986.
ACI 221.1-98, American Concrete Institute, Farmington
Hills, Michigan, 1998. Farny, James A. and Kosmatka, Steven H., Diagnosis and
Control of Alkali-Aggregate Reactions, IS413, Portland Ce-
ACI Committee 515, A Guide to the Use of Waterproofing, ment Association, 1997, 24 pages.
Dampproofing, Protective, and Decorative Barrier Systems for
Concrete, ACI 515.1R-79, revised 1985, American Concrete Fournier, B., CANMET/Industry Joint Research Program on
Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 1979. Alkali-Aggregate Reaction—Fourth Progress Report, Canada
Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Ottawa, 1997.
101
Galloway, Joseph E., Jr., “Grading, Shape and Surface National Cooperative Highway Research Program
Properties,” Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete (NCHRP), Effects of Different Methods of Stockpiling and
and Concrete-Making Materials, ASTM STP 169C, edited by Handling Aggregates, NCHRP Report 46, Transportation
Klieger, Paul and Lamond, Joseph F., American Society for Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1967.
Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania,
Ozol, Michael A., “Alkali-Carbonate Rock Reaction,”
1994, pages 401 to 410.
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-
Hadley, D. W., “Alkali Reactivity of Carbonate Rocks— Making Materials, ASTM STP 169C, edited by Klieger, Paul
Expansion and Dedolomitization,” Research Department and Lamond, Joseph F., American Society for Testing and
Bulletin RX139, Portland Cement Association, http:// Materials, Philadelphia, 1994, pages 372 to 387.
www.portcement.org/pdf_files/RX139.pdf, 1961.
PCA, Tests of Concrete Road Materials from California, Major
Helmuth, Richard, Alkali-Silica Reactivity: An Overview of Series 285, Research Reports, Portland Cement Associa-
Research, SHRP-C-342, Strategic Highway Research tion, April 1940.
Program, Washington, D. C., 1993. Also PCA Publication
PCA, Recycling D-Cracked Pavement in Minnesota, PL146,
LT177, 105 pages.
Portland Cement Association, 1980.
Houston, B. J., Investigation of Gap-Grading of Concrete
PCA, “Popouts: Causes, Prevention, Repair,” Concrete Tech-
Aggregates; Review of Available Information, Technical Re-
nology Today, PL852, Portland Cement Association, http://
port No. 6-593, Report 1, Waterways Experiment Station,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, www.portcement.org/pdf_files/PL852.pdf, June 1985.
February 1962. PCA Durability Subcommittee, Guide Specification for
Janssen, Donald J., and Snyder Mark B., “Resistance of Con- Concrete Subject to Alkali-Silica Reactions, IS415, Portland
crete to Freezing and Thawing,” SHRP-C-391, Strategic High- Cement Association, 1998.
way Research Program, Washington, D.C., 1994, 201 pages. PCA, “Controlling ASR,” Concrete Technology Today, PL971,
Kerkhoff, Beatrix, Effects of Substances on Concrete and Portland Cement Association, http://www.portcement.
Guide to Protective Treatments, IS001, Portland Cement org/pdf_files/PL971.pdf, April 1997.
Association, 2001, 24 pages. Powers, Laura J., “Developments in Alkali-Silica Gel
Kerkhoff, Beatrix and Siebel, Eberhard, “Properties of Detection,” Concrete Technology Today, PL991, Portland Ce-
Concrete with Recycled Aggregates (Part 2),” Beton 2/2001, ment Association, http://www.portcement.org/pdf_
Verlag Bau + Technik, 2001, pages 105 to 108. files/PL991.pdf, April 1999.
Kong, Hendrik, and Orbison, James G., “Concrete Scanlon, John M., Concrete Durability, Proceedings of the
Deterioration Due to Acid Precipitation,” ACI Materials Katherine and Bryant Mather International Conference, SP100,
Journal, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan,
Michigan, March-April 1987. 1987.
Litvin, Albert, and Pfeifer, Donald W., Gap-Graded Mixes Shilstone, James M., “Changes in Concrete Aggregate
for Cast-in-Place Exposed Aggregate Concrete, Development Standards,” The Construction Specifier, Alexandria, Vir-
Department Bulletin DX090, Portland Cement Associa- ginia, July 1994, pages 119 to 128.
tion, http://www.portcement.org/pdf_files/DX090.pdf, Shilstone, James M., Sr., “Concrete Mixture Optimiza-
1965. tion,” Concrete International, American Concrete Institute,
Farmington Hills, Michigan, June 1990, pages 33 to 39.
Maerz, Norbert H., and Lusher, Mike, “Measurement of
flat and elongation of coarse aggregate using digital image Stanton, Thomas E., “Expansion of Concrete through
processing,” 80th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Reaction between Cement and Aggregate,” Proceedings,
Board, Washington D.C., 2001, pages 2 to 14. American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 66, New York, 1940,
pages 1781 to 1811.
Mather, Bryant, New Concern over Alkali-Aggregate Re-
action, Joint Technical Paper by National Aggregates Asso- Stark, David, Characteristics and Utilization of Coarse
ciation and National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, Aggregates Associated with D-Cracking, Research and Devel-
NAA Circular No. 122 and NRMCA Publication No. 149, opment Bulletin RD047, Portland Cement Association,
Silver Spring, Maryland, 1975. http://www.portcement.org/pdf_files/RD047.pdf, 1976.
Matthews, C. W., “Stockpiling of Materials,” Rock Prod- Stark, D. C., Alkali-Silica Reactivity: Some Reconsiderations,
ucts, series of 21 articles, Maclean Hunter Publishing Research and Development Bulletin RD076, Portland
Company, Chicago, August 1965 through August 1967. Cement Association, http://www.portcement.org/pdf_
files/RD076.pdf, 1981.
102
Stark, David, “The Use of Recycled-Concrete Aggregate from Thomas, M. D. A.; Hooton, R. Doug; and Rogers, C. A.,
Concrete Exhibiting Alkali-Silica Reactivity,” Research and “Prevention of Damage Due to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction
Development Bulletin RD114, Portland Cement Associa- (AAR) in Concrete Construction—Canadian Approach,”
tion, 1996. Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, American Society for
Stark, David, and Klieger, Paul, Effect of Maximum Size of 1997, pages 26 to 30.
Coarse Aggregate on D-Cracking in Concrete Pavements, Re-
search and Development Bulletin RD023, Portland Ce- Thomas, M. D. A., and Innis, F. A., “Effect of Slag on
ment Association, http://www.portcement.org/pdf_files Expansion Due to Alkali-Aggregate Reaction in Con-
/RD023.pdf, 1974. crete,” ACI Materials Journal, American Concrete Institute,
Farmington Hills, Michigan, November-December 1998.
Stark, David, Eliminating or Minimizing Alkali-Silica Re-
activity, SHRP-C-343, Strategic Highway Research Pro- Touma, W. E.; Fowler, D. W.; and Carrasquillo, R. L.,
gram, Washington, D. C., 1993. Also PCA Publication Alkali-Silica Reaction in Portland Cement Concrete: Testing
LT178, 266 pages. Methods and Mitigation Alternatives, Research Report ICAR
301-1F, University of Texas, Austin, 2001, 520 pages.
Swenson, E. G., and Gillott, J. E., “Alkali Reactivity of
Dolomitic Limestone Aggregate,” Magazine of Concrete Verbeck, George, and Landgren, Robert, Influence of
Research, Vol. 19, No. 59, Cement and Concrete Associa- Physical Characteristics of Aggregates on Frost Resistance of
tion, London, June 1967, pages 95 to 104. Concrete, Research Department Bulletin RX126, Portland
Cement Association, http://www.portcement.org/pdf_
Tang, Mingshu; Deng, Min; Lon, Xianghui; and Han,
files/RX126.pdf, 1960.
Sufeng, “Studies on Alkali-Carbonate Reaction,” ACI
Materials Journal, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Vogler, R. H., and Grove, G. H., “Freeze-thaw testing of
Hills, Michigan, January-February 1994, pages 26 to 29. coarse aggregate in concrete: Procedures used by Mich-
igan Department of Transportation and other agencies,”
Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, American Society for
Vol. 11, No. 1, Summer 1989, pages 57 to 66.
103

Aggregates For Concrete

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aggregates For Concrete

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aggregates For Concrete

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HOME

Fig. 5-3. Lightweight aggregate. Expanded clay (left) and

Table 5.2. Characteristics and Tests of Aggregate

Percent passing, by mass

Fig. 5-4. Range of particle sizes found in aggregate for use 0

Fig. 5-7. The level of liquid in the graduates, representing

The AASHTO specifications permit the minimum

37.5 mm 25.0 mm 19.0 mm 12.5 mm 9.5 mm 4.75 mm 2.36 mm 1.18 mm

Aggregate is sometimes analyzed using the combined Gap-Graded Aggregates Video

continuously graded mixtures. Fine aggregate content also

3 in.) depending on the thickness of the section, amount of

graded aggregates may produce higher strengths than

Video Particle Shape and Surface Texture

water. It is used in certain computations for mixture Saturated, Damp

Absorption and Surface Moisture

be determined according to ASTM C 70, C 127, C 128, and

Bulk density, lb/ft3

Mass of fine aggregate and water in one

correlation. Mass loss due to impact in the rattler is often 0.14

as much as that due to abrasion. The wear resistance of

Drying shrinkage after 1 year in percent

placed in the lime slurry,

Mechanism of ASR. The alkali-silica reaction forms a gel

ASTM C 294, To give descriptive Visual identification Varies, but should be

Duration of test Measurement Criteria Comments

Short duration—visual Particle character- Not applicable Usually includes optical

Video AGGREGATE BENEFICIATION

Water absorption in % by mass

You might also like