CA-Sept13-Doc.5.1.

e
(Revision 1, December 2014)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
ENVIRONMENT
Directorate A – Green Economy
ENV.A.3 - Chemicals

NOTE FOR GUIDANCE

This document is an attempt to provide guidance in the interest of consistency, and has
been drafted by the Commission services responsible for biocidal products with the aim
of finding an agreement with all or a majority of the Member States' Competent
Authorities for biocidal products. Please note, however, that Member States are not
legally obliged to follow the approach set out in this document, since only the Court of
Justice of the European Union can give authoritative interpretations on the contents of
Union law.

Subject: Frequently asked questions on treated articles

The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on the implementation of the

second subparagraph of point (a) of Article 3(1), Article 58 and Article 94 of Regulation
(EU) No 528/2012 ('BPR').

It is structured in the form of questions and answers, addressing the most frequent issues
raised in requests to the Commission.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

DEFINITIONS 4
Treated article 4
Treating with vs. intentionally incorporating4
Active substance 5
Existing active substance 5
New active substance 5
PRINCIPLES6
Biocidal property 6
Biocidal function of a treated article 6
Primary biocidal function 8
Decision tree 11
Active substances15
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE APPROVAL 16
Relevant product-type and use 16
SCOPE 18
Complex articles 18
Residues from production process 24
Exemption 25
LABELLING OF TREATED ARTICLES 26
Claim regarding the biocidal properties of a treated article 26
Substantiated claims 28
Claims with public health relevance 28
Antibacterial claim 29
More than one active substance 30
Nanomaterial 30
Obligation of companies further down the supply chain 30
Location of the claim 31
Location of the label 31
Responsibility of the person placing the treated article on the market 31
Labelling of intermediate or raw materials 32
Sector-specific equivalent labelling requirements 32
Treated article designed and manufactured to meet a specific order 32
Expiry date 32

2
 Placing on the market 33
TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR TREATED ARTICLES 34

MISCELLANEOUS 37
Link with Article 95 37
APPENDIX 1 - PRODUCT EXAMPLES 40

Appendix 2 - Extracts from Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 42

3
DEFINITIONS

Treated article

1. Question:

What is a treated article?

Answer:

According to article 3(1)(l) of the BPR, a treated article is any substance, mixture or
article which has been treated with, or intentionally incorporates, one or more
biocidal products.

Treating with vs. intentionally incorporating

2. Question: Is 'treating with' to be understood differently from 'intentionally

incorporating'?

Answer: 'Treating with' indicates that a biocidal product has been applied to a
substance, mixture or an article.

Intentionally incorporating' indicates that the biocidal product has been utilised in
such a way (typically during the manufacturing of the treated article) that it becomes
part of a mixture or article.

However, in practice the distinction is of little significance for the application of

Article 58 as in both cases only approved active substances can be used and the
labelling requirements have to be complied with when a claim regarding the biocidal
properties of the treated article is made, or when the conditions for the approval of
the active substance(s) so require.

Biocidal product

3. Question:

What is a biocidal product?

Answer:

According to article 3(1)(a) of the BPR, a biocidal product is:

– any substance or mixture, in the form in which it is supplied to the

user, consisting of, containing or generating one or more active substances, with
the intention of destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of,
or otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any means
other than mere physical or mechanical action,,

– any substance or mixture, generated from substances or mixtures which do not

themselves fall under the first indent, to be used with the intention of destroying,
deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of, or otherwise exerting a
controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any means other than mere physical
or mechanical action.

4
 A treated article that has a primary biocidal function shall be considered a
biocidal product.

Active substance

4. Question:

What is an active substance?

Answer:

According to Articles 3(1)(c) and (g) of the BPR, an active substance is a substance
or a micro-organism that has an action on or against harmful organisms. i.e.
organisms, including pathogenic agents, which have an unwanted presence or a
detrimental effect on humans, their activities or the products they use or produce, on
animals or the environment.

Existing active substance

5. Question:

What is an existing active substance?

Answer:

An existing active substance is an active substance which was already available on

the market in biocidal products on 14 May 2000 and which is under evaluation in
the review programme for existing active substances used in biocidal products 1. An
active substance is regarded as 'existing' only for the product-type(s) for which it is
being evaluated in the review programme.

New active substance

6. Question:

What is a new active substance?

Answer:

A new active substance is an active substance which is not regarded as 'existing'

according to the above definition, i.e. an active substance which was made available
on the market in biocidal products only after 14 May 2000 or which was not
included in the review programme for evaluation. An active substance is considered
'existing' only for the product-types for which it is being evaluated in the review
programme, but will be regarded as new for the product-types which are not
included in the review programme.

PRINCIPLES

Biocidal property

1
As established by Article 89(1) of the BPR.

5
7. Question:

What is meant by the ‘biocidal property of a treated article’?

Answer:

A biocidal property means a characterising quality or trait resulting from the fact
that the mixture or article has been treated with or intentionally incorporates a
biocidal product with the intention to prevent the action of harmful organisms. The
term 'biocidal property' covers both biocidal actions on the treated article itself, and
actions giving a biocidal function (see below) to the treated article.

Thus a treated article with biocidal function always has a biocidal property.
Conversely, a treated article without biocidal function can nevertheless have a
biocidal property, e.g. protection from microbial decay and thus increased durability
of the article itself.

Antimicrobial treatments made, as examples, to:

 Prevent deterioration of plasticised PVC.

 Extend the lifespan of façade paints.
 Prevent odour.

would thus be expected to confer a biocidal property to the treated article.

Biocidal function of a treated article

8. Question:

What is a treated article with a biocidal function?

Answer:

The function of a treated article is the intended purpose for which the article is
supplied and which it fulfils by one or more means. A treated article can have more
than one function if it serves more than one purpose.

A biocidal function, by analogy with the definition of a biocidal product, means the
function of destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of, or
otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any means other
than mere physical or mechanical action.

A treated article with a biocidal function thus is an article which has amongst its
intended purposes at least one that aims at destroying, deterring, rendering harmless,
preventing the action of, or otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful
organism by any means other than mere physical or mechanical action. This function
is not intended to protect the article itself or its original function, but to introduce an
additional function which is biocidal. One could for instance expect a biocidal
function to be conferred to a treated article when biocidal products belonging in
particular to the following product-types would be intentionally incorporated into a
mixture or article.

PT2: Disinfectants and algaecides not intended for direct application to

6
 humans or animals.
PT4: Food and feed area disinfectants
PT18: Insecticides, acaricides and products to control other arthropods.
PT19: Repellents and attractants.

When a disinfectant is incorporated into textiles, tissues, masks, paints or any other
article or material with the objective of producing a treated article which has the
intended purpose to disinfect the disinfectant does not act as a preservative of the
treated article but confers a biocidal function to the treated article.

Antimicrobial treatments made, as examples, to:

 Computer keyboard to prevent bacterial growth on the surface

 Hospital bedside cabinet to kill germs on contact
 Door handles to prevent cross-infection

would thus confer a biocidal function to the treated article.

In the case of product-types 18 and 19, the insecticide or repellent could either be
added to protect the treated article itself, or to confer a biocidal function to the
treated article.

9. Question:

How might one determine whether a treated article has a biocidal function?

Answer:

First of all, the article as such has to be supplied with the intended purpose of
controlling harmful organisms. Secondly, at least one of the active substances in the
biocidal product(s) intentionally incorporated in the treated article has to contribute
to that purpose.

Some treated articles have an exclusively biocidal function, since an active

substance contributes to the only intended purpose of the article. Such treated
articles would by default be biocidal products.

Other treated articles have no biocidal function, even if their purpose is to control
harmful organisms. In these cases, the active substance(s) in the treated article do(es)
not contribute to that control, which is hence merely physical or mechanical.
Examples include a wooden rat trap treated with a wood preservative, or a textile
mosquito net treated with a textile preservative. According to BPR, such products
would be considered treated articles, but not biocidal products.

A third category of treated articles have two or more functions, one of which is
biocidal. Examples include clothes intentionally incorporating an insect repellent.
Such clothes have two intended purposes: To keep the body covered and warm and
to have an action against insects. Whether a product having biocidal and non-
biocidal functions is a biocidal product or a treated article depends on whether the
biocidal function is primary (see below).

7
Primary biocidal function

10. Question:

What is a 'treated article with a primary biocidal function'?

Answer:

The term 'primary biocidal function' is used only in article 3(1)(a) of the BPR, and is
not further defined in this regulation. In the given context a primary biocidal
function can be interpreted as a biocidal function of first rank, importance, or value
compared to other functions of the treated article. A 'treated article with a primary
biocidal function' is thus a treated article that has one or more functions, of which
one is a biocidal function that is of first rank, importance, or value compared to the
other functions of the treated article.

11. Question:

Are there any criteria to determine whether the biocidal function of a treated article
is 'primary', i.e. of first rank, importance, or value compared to the other functions
of that treated article?

Answer:

Whether a biocidal function of a treated article is a primary biocidal function will

need to be decided on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all individual
properties and functions of the treated article, as well as its intended use.

A treated article which only has one function, and when this function is biocidal, has
by default a primary biocidal function.

Examples include mosquito nets intended solely to control mosquitos, which are
treated with insecticides or insect repellents. Such treated articles have only one
intended purpose, and that purpose is not achieved by mere physical or mechanical
action, although a physical or mechanical action (e.g. physical prevention of
mosquitos from approaching humans) does also contribute to that intended purpose.

For treated articles which have more than one function, there are different criteria
which could indicate that the treated article has a primary biocidal function.

Criteria to be taken into account for a decision could include, but are not limited to,
the following:

 the intended use and purpose of the treated article,

 claims made regarding the function of the treated article, in particular when
it would be identical to that of an existing biocidal product,

 the target species, in particular when the species would not be harmful to the
treated article itself.

 the concentration of the active substance in the treated article, in particular

when it would be comparable to that in an existing biocidal product,

8
  the mode of action of the active substance or treated article, in particular
when it would be identical to that of an existing biocidal product,

According to Article 3(3) of the BPR, Member States may request the Commission
to decide, by means of implementing acts, whether a specific product or group of
products is a biocidal product or a treated article or neither.

12. Question:

What is the influence of a claim when determining a possible primary biocidal

function of a treated article?

Answer:

The influence of a claim on the decision whether a treated article has a primary
biocidal function will depend on the wording and presentation of the claim. The
following aspects may be considered in particular:

- the prominence of the claim

If a claim regarding a biocidal function of a treated article is given greater
prominence than other described properties or functions of that treated article, that
function may be regarded as a primary biocidal function and hence the treated article
may be considered as a biocidal product.

- whether the claim has public health relevance

It is important to note that the objective of BPR is not only to protect human health
and the environment from harmful effects of biocidal products and treated articles as
such, but also from products or articles with biocidal function that might have a
detrimental effect on public health due to insufficient efficacy. If a claim is made
which has public health relevance (i.e. regarding an action against one or more
pathogenic organisms, see also question 34) it is particularly important that a treated
article does have the effect which users would be entitled to expect in view of the
claim made2. In such cases, the biocidal function may be considered to take higher
rank than other, non-biocidal functions and it needs to be considered whether the
treated article may be a biocidal product subject to authorisation 3 before placing on
the market.

The assessment of whether a treated article with a claim of public health relevance
has a primary biocidal function must be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into
account also the criteria given in question 11.

13. Question:

What rules govern a treated substance or mixture with a biocidal function? Is it

relevant whether the biocidal function is primary or not?

Answer:
2
For an analogy with medicinal products, see Case 227/82 Van Bennekom [1983] ECR 3883
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:61982CJ0227:EN:PDF
3
The UK disagrees, based on the text of BPR, that the presence of public health claims is a relevant
factor in determining whether a treated article has a primary biocidal function, and hence is a biocidal
product. Therefore the UK disagrees with this paragraph of the guidance document.

9
If a substance or mixture, in the form in which it is supplied to the user, has an
intentional biocidal function and is not subject to any other legislation as mentioned
in Article 2.2 of the BPR, it is covered by the definition of a biocidal product in the
first indent of Article 3(1)(a) of BPR. It is therefore irrelevant whether the biocidal
function is primary or secondary.

10
Decision tree

The following decision tree has been developed to help decide whether an object treated
with or intentionally incorporating one or more biocidal products is a treated article or a
biocidal product

As a first step, it is important to decide whether the object is a "substance or a mixture" or

an "article". According to Article 3(1)(a) of the BPR, a substance or mixture only needs to
have an intended biocidal function to fulfil the definition of a biocidal products,
irrespective whether the biocidal function is primary or not. In contrast, an article is only
considered a biocidal product when it has a primary biocidal function.

For the definition of substance, mixture and article, the BPR makes reference to the
REACH Regulation4. According to this Regulation:

- Substance: means a chemical element and its compounds in the natural state or obtained
by any manufacturing process, including any additive necessary to preserve its stability
and any impurity deriving from the process used, but excluding any solvent which may be
separated without affecting the stability of the substance or changing its composition;

- Mixture: means a mixture or solution composed of two or more substances;

- Article: means an object which during production is given a special shape, surface or
design which determines its function to a greater degree than does its chemical
composition.

4
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning
the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European
Chemicals Agency. OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
 1.0 The object is an article
as defined under
Does the object meet REACH, or a
the definition of an
Y
combination of an
article as given in article and a
REACH?* substance/mixture

The object is a
substance or a mixture
as defined under
REACH

* ECHA guidance on requirements for substances in articles, in particular section 2, is available to assist
stakeholders and competent authorities to decide whether an object is a substance, a mixture or an
article, or a combination thereof.
http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/articles_en.pdf

12
The object is a substance
or a mixture as defined
under REACH

2.0

Has the substance or mixture a

biocidal function?

Y N

2.1

Has the substance or mixture

been treated with or
intentionally incorporates one
or more biocidal products?

Y* N

Object is neither a
Biocidal product Treated article biocidal product nor a
treated article

Mixtures (such as paints

etc.) containing an in-can
preservative, treated
Rodent baits clay.

* If the substance incorporates a biocidal product, it is no longer a substance, but a mixture.

13
 The object is an article
as defined under
REACH, or a
combination of an article
and a substance/mixture

3.0

Has the article or

combination been treated N
with or does it intentionally
incorporate one or more
biocidal products?

3.1

Does the treatment or

intentional incorporation
Y confer a biocidal function
to the treated article? N

3.2

Does the treatment or Treatment is intended to protect

intentional incorporation properties or function of an article,
confer a primary biocidal or extend its durability.
function to the treated
article?

Case-by-case consideration of properties, functions, uses and claims of the

treated article

Y N

Biocidal product Treated article Treated article Object is neither a

biocidal product nor
a treated article

Articles without
biocidal function (e.g.
treated wood, articles
Articles with a
treated against odour
primary biocidal Articles without a
causing bacteria,
function (e.g. primary biocidal
articles treated prior to
insecticide- function
their placing on the
impregnated bed net)
market to eliminate
harmful organisms

14
Active substances

14. Question:

How should the requirement in Article 58(2) of BPR, that 'all active substances
contained in the biocidal products' need to be approved or included in Annex I be
understood?

Answer:

This should be understood to refer to the active substances contributing to the biocidal
function(s) of the biocidal product(s) used to treat or intentionally incorporated into the
treated article. Active substances, which do not contribute to the biocidal function(s), of
the biocidal product(s) such as an in-can preservative contained in the biocidal product,
are not covered by this requirement of Article 58(2). However, it should be noted that
biocidal products used in the manufacturing of treated articles in the EU are subject to
other requirements of BPR and can only contain in-can preservatives that are approved,
included in Annex I or under evaluation in the review programme.

15. Question:

In Article 58(3)(c) of BPR, what does 'all active substances contained in the biocidal
products' mean?

Answer:

This is to be understood to include all active substances which contribute to the biocidal
function(s) of the biocidal product(s) that was used to treat or intentionally incorporated
into the treated article.

As an example, if a claim is made regarding the biocidal property of treated wood (e.g.
long-lasting wood protection against insects), the name of the active substance acting as
wood preservative in the biocidal product would have to appear on the label of the
treated article, but not the name of any in-can preservative contained in the biocidal
product.

16. Question:

If a finished good incorporates a substance which is known to have some biocidal

activity (e.g. substances included in Annex I of Regulation (EC) No 1451/2007), but
which has been used for reasons unrelated to this biocidal activity (e.g. essential oils,
such as lavender oil, that may be used to perfume certain articles), must the substance be
approved if the article is placed on the EU market?

Answer:

No, Article 58 of BPR relates to treated article that were treated with a biocidal product.
This means that the product (and hence the active substance) must have been applied
with the intention of conferring a biocidal property or function.

15
 However, in case of controls by competent authorities, the burden of the proof will be on
the person placing the treated article on the market to demonstrate that a substance with
potential biocidal activity was incorporated for purposes other than its biocidal activity.

ACTIVE SUBSTANCE APPROVAL

Relevant product-type and use

17. Question:

How wide or narrow is the notion of 'relevant use' to be defined? As it is listed in

addition to the PT, it seems that the approval for the appropriate PT is not sufficient in
the absence of a mentioning of the particular use in the approval.

Answer:

The assessment of an active substance is done on the basis of a representative product,

and the active substance is approved if at least one biocidal product containing that
substance is expected to meet the criteria for authorisation. This implies that, as a general
rule, not all possible uses of an active substance are considered at the time of approval.

The current practice varies from product-type to product-type. In the case of wood
preservatives, for which use classes are well codified, these use classes are considered in
the assessment and the area of use is an element of the approval. For other product-types,
such as insecticides or disinfectants, no such distinction between use classes is currently
made in the active substance approval.

With the introduction of provisions for treated articles in the BPR, the basic principle
that active substance approval is based on one or more representative biocidal products
has not been changed. It is only possible to comprehensively assess uses in treated
articles at the time of initial active substance approval where there is already a well-
established and codified practice, such as for wood preservatives. For other product
types there was no obligation for applicants to provide data on all possible uses in treated
articles in the dossiers submitted under the review programme.

For other product-types, the approval of an active substance would generally also cover
the use in treated articles. However, if concerns are identified during the assessment,
restrictions or conditions can be established in the approval of active substance in
relation to treated articles.

Concerning limitations on the possibility of the active substance to be used in treated

articles, a similar approach as for the approval of the active substance for use in biocidal
product is followed, i.e.

• Restrictions concerning the use of the active substance in treated articles are
introduced only where a major concern is identified.

16
 • In such cases, the approval will indicate in which categories of treated articles the
active substance and biocidal products containing it can or, as appropriate, cannot be
used.

• Major concern shall correspond to cases:

o where the active substance meets the exclusion criteria set in Article 5(1), but
would benefit from a derogation to the exclusion on the basis of Article 5(2).

o When there are reasons for major concern linked to the nature of the critical effect,
which in combination with certain foreseeable use pattern could pose such a risk to
human health (the user of a treated article, the general public etc.), or to the
environment, such as justifying a restriction on the use of the active substance and
biocidal products containing it in treated articles.

In cases where, based on a case-by-case assessment, a concern has been identified which
does not justify the limitation of uses in treated articles as described above, a provision
on labelling of treated articles can be established in the approval.

18. Question:

How strictly shall the scope of the PTs be looked at? For example, the textile industry
mentioned that they often use biocides in textiles to protect it as well as to prevent bad
odours.

Answer:

The active substance shall have been approved for the PT for which the biocidal
product(s) will exert a biocidal function in the treated article.

For example, if a textile has been treated with a biocidal product which will preserve the
article as well as prevent the development of bad odours, the active substance(s) shall
have been approved for product-type 9, as this product-type covers both products used
for the preservation of fibres as well as products which antagonise the settlement of
micro-organisms and thus prevent the development of odours.

However, if a textile has been treated with a biocidal product preserving the article as
well as giving it a disinfecting function, the active substance(s) shall have been approved
for both product-types 2 and 9, as product-type 2 covers products used to be
incorporated in textiles with the purpose of producing treated articles with a disinfecting
function, whilst product-type 9 covers products used for the preservation of fibres.

17
SCOPE

Complex articles

19. Question:

Does the concept of treated articles cover only treatments made on the finished article, or
also treatments made on components further back in the supply chain? If so, how far
back in the supply chain have possible treatments to be identified?

For example, a table is manufactured outside the EU from composite wood, and the
wood is bound with glue containing an in-can preservative (also manufactured outside
the EU) – does the preservative have to be approved if the table is then placed on the EU
market? Or, electrical components within a television were treated with a biocidal
product to give them protection against the growth of fungi (and no other part of the TV
was treated). Does the active substance in the fungicide have to be approved in the EU?

Answer:

This question has been addressed in detail in a document discussed with the Competent
Authorities of EU Member States in September 2014. This text (revised following
discussion) is included in Appendix 3.

Article 3(1) (l) of the BPR defines a treated article as '…any substance, mixture or article
which has been treated with, or intentionally incorporates one or more biocidal products'.
As indicated in Article 58 (2) to (4), the provisions of Article 58 apply to treated articles
in the form in which they are placed on the EU market (in the following also referred to
as "finished goods").

Against this background, it is evident that any finished good that has, as such, been
treated with or intentionally incorporates a biocidal product qualifies as a treated article.
On the other hand, treatment with or incorporation of a biocidal product can happen at
any point during the manufacturing process. The definition of a treated article implies
that the treatment with or incorporation of a biocidal product is made with the intention
of conferring a biocidal property (or even a biocidal function) to the treated article, and
can thus be expected to lead to a beneficial and desired effect in the finished good (e.g.
protecting it from bio-degradation during storage or use). Following this logic, the scope
of treated articles shall exclude such biocidal treatments or incorporation of biocides in a
substance, mixture or article, or individual constituents thereof, which were made in the
course of manufacturing merely in order to perform a specific biocidal function at that
stage of the process, but which will not have an intended biocidal effect in the finished
good as placed on the EU market.

In the case of "complex" articles made up of different components and/or materials, it is

unlikely that any treatment or incorporation of a biocidal product concerns uniformly all
components/materials. Nevertheless, one or several individual components/materials of a
complex article may have been treated with or incorporate a biocidal product, and the
biocidal property or function conferred to these components/materials may still be
beneficial for the finished good as such (e.g. by increasing overall durability of the
complex article). Such complex articles are to be regarded as treated articles.

18
 Consequently, in relation to the examples given in the question, the residual presence of
an in-can preservative in the glue used to make composite wood would not lead to a
classification as a treated article, as this preservative was used to preserve the glue
during storage, but not after its use to make the composite wood and the finished table.
On the other hand, in the second example it appears that the protection against fungi is
intended to be effective in the finished television set, which then would have to be
considered a treated article.

20. Question:

What if only a small part of an article has been treated with or intentionally incorporates
a biocidal product?

Answer:

The above interpretation also applies when only a small part of the finished good has
been treated. If the treatment still has an intended biocidal function in the finished good,
it is considered a treated article.

21. Question:

Which criteria could be applied to decide whether a finished good qualifies as a treated
article?

Answer:

Indications whether a biocidal treatment has an intentional biocidal effect in a finished

good can come from various elements, e.g. a claim concerning a biocidal property or
function of the finished good or part thereof, the PT of the biocidal product used for the
treatment and/or the concentration of the AS in the finished good.

22. Question:

Which role has a claim made on a finished good that is placed on the market in order to
decide whether this good is a treated article?

Answer:

Claims on a finished good have an important role in indicating the intentional presence
of a biocidal active substance that exerts a beneficial and intended effect.

In all cases where a claim concerning a biocidal function of a finished good is made, it is
evident that the presence of a biocidal active substance in the finished good is intended
by the manufacturer. Such goods will always be considered treated articles if, based on
their overall characteristics, they do not qualify as a biocidal product themselves.

Also a claim concerning a biocidal property (i.e. that the finished good is protected
against bio-degradation) clearly indicates an intentional presence of a biocidal active
substance in the finished good. Moreover, also more implicit claims not directly
referring to a biocidal action but e.g. concerning an increased durability or anti-odour
properties of a textile can be taken as an indication that the presence of a biocidal active

19
 substance in the good is intentional. In this case, the good would be considered a treated
article unless the manufacturer/importer can present convincing justification that the
claimed property is not due to a biocidal treatment that has led to the presence of the
biocidal active substance.

If a biocidal active substance is present in the finished good the absence of a claim does,
however, not automatically imply that the presence of the substance is unintentional. In
such cases, other criteria like any available knowledge biocidal treatments made during
production and on the uses and effective concentration of the active substance present
need to be considered to decide whether the finished good qualifies as a treated article.

23. Question:

Which role has the PT of the biocidal product used for the treatment in order to decide
whether a finished good is a treated article?

Answer:

Knowledge about the biocidal treatment and the biocidal product used for this purpose,
including the PT it is authorised for, are the best source of information to determine
whether the presence of a biocidal active substance in a finished good is intentional or
not. However, if a known biocidal active substance is present in a finished good, and no
information is available on the biocidal treatment that lead to this presence, the PT(s) for
which an active substance is approved in the EU for may give indications about whether
its presence is intentional or unintentional (see table below). It needs to be kept in mind
that a substance with known biocidal activity may be present in a mixture or article for
other purposes. If in the case of an enforcement action a biocidal use of the substance
cannot be excluded, it will be the responsibility of the manufacturer/importer to justify
that the substance is not present for biocidal purposes.

PT1 (human hygiene Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing AS that fall into this PT are
disinfectants) likely to be classified as biocidal products due to their use and the nature of the
biocidal effect.

PT2 (disinfectants) Chemical substances or mixture containing AS that fall into this PT are likely to be
classified as biocidal products due to their use and the nature of the biocidal effect.
PT3 (veterinary
hygiene products) The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in an article generally indicates an
intended effect in the final good, and such articles, if not biocidal products by
PT4 (food and feed themselves, would qualify as treated articles.
area disinfectants)
PT5 (drinking water Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing AS that fall into this PT are
disinfectants) likely to be classified as biocidal products due to their use and the nature of the
biocidal effect.

PT6 (preservatives for Biocidal products of PT6 are widely used to preserve products during storage. If the
products during preserved good (a chemical substance, a mixture or an article) itself is placed on the
storage) market it qualifies as a treated article.

An exceptional case are biocidal products (examples given in BPR, Annex V are
rodenticides, insecticides, other baits, but in principle applicable to all BPs),
preserved with PT6 preservatives, which qualify as biocidal products due to the
presence of other biocidal active substances.

20
 Chemical substances and mixtures containing an in-can preservative may however
be further used as ingredients in the manufacturing process of other finished goods.
If the in-can preservative of such an ingredients in such cases has no further
intended biocidal function later in the finished good, the residual presence of
preservatives stemming from preserved ingredients should not qualify the finished
good as a treated article.

Also solid components used in the manufacture of a complex finished article may
incorporate a PT6 preservative. In such cases it needs to be considered whether the
preservation is relevant only during storage of this component (and not later in the
finished article), or whether the preservation is also beneficial during the storage
and possibly use of the finished article. In the first case, the finished article does not
qualify as a treated article. in the latter case, the finished article would have to be
considered a treated article.

PT7 (film The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in a chemical substance or

preservatives) mixture or an article generally indicates an intended effect in the final good and
such articles would qualify as treated articles.

PT8 (wood Biocidal products of PT8 (wood preservatives) will usually be used with the
preservatives) intention to provide long-term preservation of the wood, which would continue to
be effective in the finished good, which would thus qualify as a treated article.

Exceptions to this may be PT8 biocidal products used at saw-mill stage or during
initial storage, which only serve to protect the wood at this stage from harmful
organisms (e.g. short-term preservation of freshly cut wood with fungicides to
prevent the discoloration caused by blue stain forming fungi until further
processing), or curative treatments of wood before being manufactured into a
finished good. Articles made at a later stage from wood that has undergone such
treatments should not be considered treated articles.

PT9 (fibre, leather, The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in a chemical substance or
rubber and mixture or an article generally indicates an intended effect in the final good and
polymerised materials such articles would qualify as treated articles.
preservative)

PT10 (construction
material preservatives)

PT11 (preservatives Biocidal products of PT 11 are likely to be used mainly in closed systems. Any
for liquid-cooling and traces of such preservatives in finished goods produced in the facility using these
processing systems) biocidal products should be considered unintentional and thus do not qualify the
good as a treated article.

However, preserved cooling or processing liquids as well as systems containing

them, have to be considered treated articles when they are placed on the market.

PT12 (slimicides) Biocidal products of PT12 are used in industrial processes to control slime growth
at certain stages. Any traces of the AS in a finished good should be considered
unintentional and thus do not qualify the good as a treated article. However, any
liquids, fluids etc. containing slimicides, when placed themselves on the market,
have to be considered treated articles.

PT13 (working or Cutting or working fluids are used at certain stages of the production process. Any
cutting fluid traces of such preservatives in finished goods produced in the facility using these
preservatives) biocidal products, should be considered unintentional and thus do not qualify the
good as a treated article. However, any working or cutting fluids containing
preservatives, when placed on the market, have to be considered treated articles.

21
 PT14-17, 20 Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing AS that fall into these PTs
(vertebrate pest are likely to be classified as biocidal products due to their use and the nature of the
control) biocidal effect.

PT18 (insecticides) Chemical substances or mixture containing AS that fall into this PT are likely to be
classified as biocidal products due to their use and the nature of the biocidal effect.
PT19 (repellents and
attractants) The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in an article generally indicates an
intended effect in the final good, and such articles, if not biocidal products by
PT21 (antifouling themselves, would qualify as treated articles.
products)

PT22 (embalming and

taxidermist fluids)

24. Question:

Which role has the concentration of the active substance in the finished good in order to
decide whether this good is a treated article?

Answer:

In cases where information on the concentration of the active substance in the finished
good is available, this may also provide useful indications. The use of biocidal products
in certain production processes may leave traces of the biocidal active substances in the
finished good. Preserved chemical mixtures that serve as ingredients for products will
typically be diluted during production, so that the remaining concentration of in-can
preservatives in the finished good is likely to be below the range where they would be
effective. The presence of low, non-effective, concentrations of a biocide, together with
the absence of any other indication that their presence in the finished good is intentional,
may provide an indication that the finished good should not be considered as a treated
article with regard to those active substances.

However, there may be cases where a biocidal active substance is present in a finished
good at a concentration at which it could potentially exhibit biocidal activity, but this
presence is still due to a use in an upstream step in production and the activity is neither
intended by the manufacturer nor beneficial for the final article (e.g. the remaining
presence of an in-can preservative in a dried glue or paint layer in/on an article, where
preservation of the dried matrix is no longer required). In cases where an active
substance in sufficient concentration to be active is present in an article or in a part
thereof, it needs to be decided on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the nature and
features of the article (including claims) and knowledge on the biocidal treatment made
during production, whether the finished good qualifies as a treated article or not with
regards to those active substances.

25. Question:

Could treated articles be defined as articles which, as a whole, contain more than 0.1%
of the active substance, in analogy with REACH?

Answer:

22
 Under REACH, the presence of a chemical identified as “substance of very high
concern” and constituting ≥0.1% by weight of a given article triggers duties for the
supplier to communicate information down the supply chain (REACH Regulation 5
Article 33). However, no trigger value for the application of the requirements of Article
58 of BPR for treated articles has been defined in this Regulation.

26. Question :

A sofa that has been treated with a fungicide to prevent growth of mould during
shipping, , is that to be regarded as a treated article?

Answer:

The sofa has been treated with a PT 9 preservative in order to prevent deterioration of
the finished good. This function is intended and remains a property of the sofa,
regardless of whether the sofa is placed in conditions where mould can grow or not.
Thus the sofa is to be regarded as a treated article.

Residues from production process

27. Question:

An article contains residues of a biocidal treatment that was used during the production
process on some part of the manufacturing equipment. The treatment was not applied on
the article itself. Must the active substance in this biocidal treatment be approved if the
article is imported?

For example, paper could contain traces of a biocide that was applied as a slimicide to
the printing equipment.

Answer:

No, a treated article is an article that is “treated with, or intentionally incorporates, a

biocidal product”. In this case the biocide has not been used with the intention to still
have a biocidal function in the finished good. Therefore, for such an imported good, the
active substance does not have to be approved for this use.

Exemption

28. Question:

What is the scope of the exemption foreseen in Article 58(1) of BPR?

Answer:

The purpose of this provision is to exempt from the requirements of Article 58 all goods
stored or contained in a premise or, respectively, transported in a container, which was
fumigated or disinfected as the sole biocidal treatment, on the condition that no residues
would be expected to remain from such treatment.

5
insert reference REACH

23
 This provision can be relevant for instance for goods imported from third countries and
which, by virtue of international trade agreements, have to undergo a specific treatment
(i.e. fumigation or disinfection) before they can be placed on the EU market to prevent
the transmission of organisms presenting a risk to animal or human health.

29. Question:

Does it cover all goods that were in the premises or containers when the fumigation or
disinfection took place?

Answer:

The exemption covers all goods that were in the premises or containers which were
fumigated or disinfected as the sole treatment with a biocide.

30. Question:

When can it be expected that no residues remain from such treatments?

Answer:

It is the responsibility of the person placing the treated article on the market to assess
whether residues can be expected to remain from such treatment. If residues remain, the
provisions of Article 58 will apply, if not, the exemption is applicable.

If the person placing the treated article on the market considers that no residues remain,
but ad hoc controls indicate the presence of residues, the conditions for the exemption
will not be met and the provisions of Article 58 apply.

LABELLING OF TREATED ARTICLES

Claim regarding the biocidal properties of a treated article

31. Question:

What is a claim regarding a biocidal property?

Answer:

In the context of Article 58(3) of the BPR, a claim is a statement indicating or implying:

 either that the treated article has a certain degree of protection against unwanted
organisms. In this case, a claim thus refers to a biocidal property of the treated article.

 or that the treated article has a certain efficacy or action against unwanted organisms.
In this case, a claim refers to a biocidal function of the treated article.

In cases where a claim is made, the efficacy of the treated article or of the treatment
must be demonstrated in order for the claim to be substantiated (see also Question 33).

24
32. Question:

A treated article is marketed with a statement that it incorporates an active substance

solely for the purpose of protecting the article. Does this article have to be labelled?

Answer:

This statement is a claim regarding the biocidal properties of the treated article. Such a
statement would therefore trigger the labelling information listed under the second
subparagraph of Article 58(3)

Examples of similar statements, which would be regarded as claim regarding the

biocidal properties of the treated article, are given in the table below according to the
type of substances (mainly preservatives) used to treat or intentionally incorporated in
the treated article.

PT6: Preservatives for Contains a preservative to control microbial deterioration.

products during storage
PT7: Film preservatives Contains a preservative to control microbial deterioration.
Contains a preservative to control algal growth.
Contains a preservative to protect the initial properties of
the treated article.
PT8: Wood preservatives Contains a preservative to control wood-destroying or
wood-disfiguring organisms, including insects.
PT9: Fibre, leather, Contains a preservative to control microbiological
rubber and polymerised deterioration.
materials preservatives Contains a preservative to antagonise the growth of micro-
organisms on the surface of the treated article.
Contains a preservative to hamper or prevent the
development of odour on/in the treated article.
PT10: Construction Contains a preservative to control microbial deterioration.
material preservatives Contains a preservative to control algal growth.
PT11: Preservatives for Contains a preservative to control harmful organisms such
liquid-cooling and as microbes, algae and mussels.
processing systems
Product-type 12: Contains a preservative to control slime growth.
Slimicides

Product-type 13: Contains a preservative to control microbial deterioration

Working or cutting fluid in fluids used for working or cutting metal, glass or
preservatives other materials.
Product-type 18: Contains an insecticide to to protect the material against
Insecticides, acaricides deterioration.
and products to control Contains an insecticide.

25
 other arthropods. Contains an acaricide.

Product-type 19: Contains an insect repellent to protect the material against

Repellents and deterioration.
attractants.

It should be noted that, although all the above statements follow a similar structure
("Contains…"), any wording indicating incorporation or a treatment with a biocidal active
substance to achieve a biocidal property of the treated article would constitute a claim
triggering the labelling requirement.

Substantiated claims

33. Question:

What is to be understood by the term "where substantiated" in Article 58(3)(b) of BPR in

relation to the biocidal property attributed to the treated article?

Answer:

'Where substantiated' is to be understood as 'where supported with proof or evidence'. In

other words, the label should not provide information on the biocidal property attributed
to the treated article, when the importer or manufacturer of the treated article is not able
to support the claim through appropriate data. The substantiation of a claim is even more
important in cases where a biocidal function of the treated article is claimed.

The requirement that any claim made is clear, accurate and substantiated follows also
from the provisions of Directive 2005/29/EC6 on Unfair Commercial Practices.

Claims with public health relevance

34. Question:

What is a claim with public health relevance?

Answer:

In the context of the BPR, a claim with public health relevance is a statement that a
treated article is expected to provide benefits against pathogenic organisms of public
health relevance if used as indicated or implied by the person placing the treated article
on the market.

Claims with public health relevance cover claims that a treated article would protect
users or others against specific pathogenic bacteria, viruses, fungi or other organisms

6
2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer
commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC
and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European
Parliament and of the Council

26
 such as E. coli, S. aureus, Salmonella sp., Streptococcus sp., influenza H1N1 virus, and
diseases vectors, such as ticks or mosquitoes.

Claims with public health relevance deserve a greater level of scrutiny because of their
potential impact on public health. Thus, when such claims are made on a treated article,
they need to be considered, together with all other individual properties and functions
and the intended uses of the treated article, in the decision as to whether the treated
article may have a primary biocidal function (see also Questions 11 and 12)7.

Antibacterial claim

35. Question:

Is it acceptable to indicate 'antibacterial' on the label of a treated article?

Answer:

Claims such as:

 Antibacterial
 Fight germs
 Kills 99% bacteria
 Provide antibacterial protection
 Control fungus.

indicate that the treated article has a biocidal function. Such claims are acceptable
provided they are substantiated as indicated in Article 58(3) of the BPR.

However, taking into account all other individual properties, functions and intended uses
of the treated article, this biocidal function could be considered as a primary biocidal
function.

In such cases, the treated article would be regarded as a biocidal product and would have
to be authorised as such.

On the other hand, a statement such as 'contains a preservative against microbial

deterioration' would be regarded as a claim regarding the biocidal properties of the
treated article, but not about the biocidal function of the treated article.

More than one active substance

36. Question:

If the treated article has been treated with biocidal product(s) containing more than one
active substance, should the label refer to all of them, or only to the one(s) that gave rise
to the claim or for which the conditions for the approval of the active substance so
require?
7
The UK disagrees, based on the text of BPR, that the presence of public health claims is a relevant factor in
determining whether a treated article has a primary biocidal function, and hence is a biocidal product.   Therefore the
UK disagrees with this paragraph of the guidance document

27
 Answer:

When a treated article has been treated with biocidal product(s) containing more than
one active substance, the label only has to mention those substances that contribute to the
biocidal properties claimed, or for which the conditions for the approval require such
labelling (see also Question 15).

Nanomaterial

37. Question:

If the conditions of the first subparagraph of Article 58(3) are not fulfilled, but the
biocidal product contains a nanomaterial, is it so that there is no obligation to indicate
this on a label?

Answer:

The obligation to indicate on the label that a treated article contains a nanomaterial only
applies in cases where a claim is made that the treated article has a biocidal property or
when it contains an active substance for which the conditions of approval require
labelling.

Obligation of companies further down the supply chain

38. Question:

What are the obligations of the companies further down the supply chain? Does the
labelling have to remain on the treated article throughout its life cycle?

Answer:

Companies further down the supply chain have no further obligations apart from
suppliers of treated articles, which in accordance with Article 58(5) have to respond
within 45 days to consumer requests concerning the biocidal treatment of the treated
article.

However, if a treated article is incorporated in a new product, which itself will then meet
the definition of a treated article, the person responsible for placing this product on the
market needs to comply to the labelling provisions of article 58(3) in cases where those
provisions are triggered.

Location of the claim

39. Question:

Where does a biocidal claim have to be made for labelling to be required? For example,
a treated article is marketed without mention of biocidal properties, but the
accompanying technical documentation mentions that it has been treated with a biocide
with the purpose to confer a biocidal property.

28
 Answer:

BPR does not specify where a claim has to be made in order for labelling to be required.
Thus, if the claim is included as part of the technical specifications of an article, this
would trigger the labelling requirement if a biocidal property is claimed.

Location of the label

40. Question:

Where does the label for a treated article have to be placed – must it be affixed to the
article itself or can it be placed on instructions or packaging?

Answer:

The decision where to place the label will be a case-by-case decision depending on the
individual features of the treated article in question. Article 58(6) implies that whenever
possible, the label should be affixed to the treated article itself, but provided that “Where
necessary because of the size or the function of the treated article, the labelling shall be
printed on the packaging, on the instructions for use or on the warranty (…) unless [the]
Member State provides otherwise”. It is thus a matter of judgement for the person
responsible for the placing on the market whether the label can be placed on the treated
article itself, in which case it has to be placed there, or must be put on the packaging or
instructions.

Responsibility of the person placing the treated article on the market

41. Question:

How is the relationship between paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of Article 58 of BPR to be

understood? Who decides if labelling is in any case necessary to protect human beings
and the environment?

Answer:

This is the responsibility of the person placing the treated article on the market to decide,
in view of the available information on the hazard profile of the active substance(s) and
the foreseeable uses of the treated article, on the possible risks that the treated article
may pose to human or animal health or the environment, and whether any relevant
instructions for use should be provided to the end-user to minimise that risk.

This also follows from the provisions of Directive 2001/95 on the General Safety of
Products.

Labelling of intermediate or raw materials

42. Question:

Do intermediates or raw materials treated with or intentionally incorporating a biocidal

product need to be labelled?

Answer:

29
 If these intermediate or raw materials meet the definition of a treated article, the
provisions of Article 58 will apply to them if they are themselves placed on the EU
market. This means that not only the provisions on labelling will need to be observed,
but also those regarding the active substance contained in the biocidal product used to
treat these intermediates or raw materials.

43. Question:

Article 58(6) is very limited in the possibilities to submit the information required by the
labelling provisions for treated articles. Apart from a label on the treated article itself,
only use-instructions or warranty papers are mentioned as alternatives. However, for
intermediate or raw materials supplied in the context of business-to-business
transactions, direct labelling may not be practical and use-instructions or warranty papers
are not usually available. Can transport or commercial papers be used to transmit the
required information?

Answer:

The reference to use instructions or warranty paper as a means to fulfil the labelling
requirements seems to have been devised with mainly goods geared towards private or
professional end-users in mind. Where intermediate or raw materials meet the definition
of a treated article and labelling requirements apply, it appears appropriate to interpret
the term "use-instructions" widely and allow the inclusion of the required information in
any documentation accompanying the intermediate/raw material.

Sector-specific equivalent labelling requirements

44. Question:

What needs to be done in terms of identifying those cases where sector-specific

equivalent labelling requirements already exist?

Answer:

It is for the person placing the treated article on the market and relying on sector-specific
legislation to prove, in case of enforcement action, that the labelling requirements for
treated articles are adequately addressed through this sector-specific legislation, i.e. that
at least equivalent information is provided.

Treated article designed and manufactured to meet a specific order

45. Question:

How is the provision in Article 58(6) of BPR relating to treated article designed and
manufactured to meet a specific order to be understood?

Answer:

This provision only applies to treated articles that are not produced as a part of series. It
offers some degree of flexibility as to the means that can be used to convey the
information to be provided to the customer, but not on the content of this information.

30
Expiry date

46. Question:

Is it mandatory or acceptable to indicate an expiry date on the label of a treated article as

its biocidal function might be limited in time due to, for instance, washing off of the
active substance contained in it?

Answer:

There is no legal requirement to indicate an expiration date on the treated article.

Manufacturers of the article can however do it at their own will if they deem it useful.

Placing on the market

47. Question:

How is 'placing on the market' to be interpreted in the context of the labelling

requirements of Article 58(3) – is labelling required for each individual treated article
placed on the market after 1 September 2013, or only if a new product type or model is
placed on the EU market for the first time?

Answer:

Placing on the market8 is the initial action of making a product available for the first
time on the EU market, with a view to distribution or use in the Community. The
concept of placing on the market refers to each individual product, not to a type of
product, and whether it was manufactured as an individual unit or in series. This means
that even though a product model or type has been marketed or sold before the BPR has
entered into force, individual units of the same model or type, which are made available
on the market after 1 September 2013 must comply with these new requirements.

TRANSITIONAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR TREATED ARTICLES

The transitional rules concerning treated articles are laid down in Article 94 of the BPR. This
article was recently modified by Regulation (EU) No 334/2014 amending Regulation (EU)
No 528/2012, and the below guidance is based on the amended text.

48. Question:

From when does the requirement of Article 58(2) apply that a treated article may only be
placed on the market if all active substances used for treating it are approved or included
in Annex I of BPR?

8
For more information on the concept of 'placing on the market', please refer to
http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/single-market-goods/files/blue-guide/guidepublic_en.pdf

31
 Answer:

Up to 1 March 2017, treated articles placed on the EU market may still have been treated
with biocidal active substance neither approved/included in Annex I of BPR, nor under
evaluation in the review programme.

From 1 March 2017, treated articles may only be placed on the EU market if all the
biocidal active substances they have been treated with are either approved/included in
Annex I of BPR, and thus comply with Article 58(2), or are under evaluation in the
review programme.

49. Question:

An article is treated with a biocide containing an active substance that is not yet approved
in the EU, but is included in the review programme for the relevant product type. Can
this article continue to be marketed until a decision is taken on the approval/non-approval
of the active substance? What happens after such a decision is taken?

Answer:

A treated article can continue to be placed on the market after 1 March 2017 if the
relevant active substance/PT combination is included in the review programme (i.e. the
work programme referred to in Article 89(1)) by that date.

In case a decision is taken after 1 September 2016 not to approve the active substance for
the relevant PT, the treated article can only be placed on the market for another 180 days
after this decision.

In case a decision is taken to approve the substance for the appropriate PT (and use,
where relevant), the transitional rules continue to apply until the date of approval (which,
for active substances in the review programme, is ca. two years later than the decision).
This may be relevant in cases where certain provisions concerning the use of the active
substance for treated articles are included in the decision, e.g. labelling requirements or
use restrictions.

50. Question:

For the transitional rules of Article 94 to apply, is it relevant whether the treated article
was already on the market when the BPR came into force (1 September 2013)?

Answer:

According to the amended text provided by Regulation (EU) No 334/2014 it is not

necessary that a treated article was already on the EU market on 1 September 2013 for
the transitional rules to apply.

51. Question:

An existing active substance, used to make a treated article, is subject to a non-approval

decision. As far as one knows, no new application will be made to support the active
substance. What are the consequences for the treated article?

32
 Answer:

If a non-approval decision for an active substance is taken before 1st September 2016, the
treated article can continue to be placed on the market until 1 March 2017.

For treated articles manufactured in the EU, the non-approval decision will however also
affect the availability of biocidal products that can be used for the treatment. Biocidal
products containing an active substance subject to a non-approval decision can only be
made available on the market for 12 month after the date of such a decision, and be used
for 18 month after the date of the decision.

If a decision on the non-approval of an active substance is taken after 1 September 2016,

the treated article can only be placed on the market for another 180 days after the
decision.

Considering that biocidal products containing an active substance subject to a non-

approval decision can be made available on the market and used for another 12/18
months, respectively, after the date of the decision, it will in this case still be possible to
manufacture treated articles in the EU. However, after expiry of the 180 day-deadline for
the placing on the market of the treated article in the EU, such treated articles can only be
manufactured for export.

Please note that the deadlines for treated articles concern explicitly the placing on the
market of treated articles, i.e. the first making available on the market of an individual
product. Any later making available on the market (i.e. further supply and distribution)
and use of this same individual treated article is not covered by the scope of the BPR.

52. Question:

What if a treated article has been treated with or incorporates an active substance for
which an application for approval has been made pursuant to Article 94? Can it already
be placed on the market during the review of the active substance?

Answer:

Until 1 March 2017, Article 94 provides a general derogation for treated articles treated
with or incorporating active substances which are neither approved, included in Annex I,
or under evaluation in the review programme.

If an application for the approval of such an active substance for the relevant PT has been
submitted before the 1 September 2016, the treated article may still be placed on the
market after 1 March 2017 until a decision is taken on the approval/non-approval of the
active substance for this PT.

If an application for approval of such an active substance is submitted after 1 September

2016, a treated article that has been treated with it or intentionally incorporates it can
only be placed on the market once the active substance has been approved for the relevant
PT.

However, it should be noted that unless one of the derogations foreseen in BPR for the
authorisation of biocidal products applies, it will not be possible to use in the EU in the

33
 manufacture of treated articles a biocidal product containing an active substance for
which the submission will have been made pursuant to Article 94. This will only become
possible once the new active substance is approved and the product authorised.

53. Question:

Why should a person responsible for placing on the market of a treated article be aware
about the progress in assessing the active substance with which the article has been
treated?

Answer:

Persons responsible for placing on the market a treated article should careful monitor the
progress in assessment of the relevant active substances to be aware of upcoming
decisions concerning them. In case of a non-approval decision, a strict deadline applies
after which the treated article can no longer be placed on the market. But also in case on
an approval decision, the approval may be subject to certain use restrictions or labelling
obligations for treated articles may be prescribed.

54. Question:

Article 94 on the transitional measures concerning treated articles does not include
specific provision for the labelling of treated articles. Is there a deadline when the
labelling of treated articles has to comply with the provisions of Article 58(3)?

Answer:

The BPR does indeed not foresee transitional measures for the labelling of treated
articles. This means that the requirement for labelling based on a claim made by the
manufacturer in Article 58(3) applied from the date of coming into application of the
BPR, i.e. 1 September 2013, and all treated articles placed on the EU market after this
date have to comply with the labelling requirement.

It should be noted that the labelling provisions of article 58(3) concerns the "placing on
the market", but not the subsequent supply, and that there is no mandatory labelling of all
treated articles already present in the supply chain on 1 September 2013.

Labelling requirements imposed by conditions in the active substance approval apply

from the date of approval. For substances evaluated in the frame of the review
programme, this date, is specified in the approval decision and usually is two year after
the issuing of the decision.

MISCELLANEOUS

Link with Article 95

55. Question:

34
 Does Article 95 of the BPR apply to treated articles, i.e. can a mixture or article only be
treated with or intentionally incorporate a biocidal product containing an active
substance if the supplier has submitted a dossier or a letter of access to ECHA?

Answer:

No, the requirements on alternative suppliers in Article 95 do not directly apply to

substances used only in treated articles governed by Article 58 of BPR. However, it does
apply to substances placed on the EU market in biocidal products, or with the intention
of being used in biocidal products, and thus may have an indirect effect for treated
articles produced in the EU, as the biocidal products used need to comply with Article
95.

Packaging

56. Question:

For the purpose of the provisions on treated articles, is the packaging of a treated article
regarded as part of the article itself?

Answer:

According to ECHA guidance for the REACH 9 Regulation, packaging does not become
part of the packaged article, but remains a separate article.

However, packaging materials meeting themselves the definition of a ‘treated article’

have to comply with Article 58 of BPR when placed on the market.

Therefore, an importer placing on the EU market a treated article together with its
packaging have to consider whether the packaging may constitute a treated article, and
provisions of article 58 need to be observed.

57. Question:

Is primary and secondary packaging of products such as medicinal products, medical

devices and cosmetics covered by the exemption for these products according to Article
2 (2), so that the provisions for treated articles under the BPR do not apply to the
packaging?

Answer:

The BPR exempts treated articles from its scope if they are within the scope of certain
other legislations. This means the primary and secondary packaging would be subject to
BPR rules only in cases where the packaging of the products is not addressed by the
rules governing this type of products.

It needs also to be kept in mind that if packaging materials treated with biocidal products
are placed on the EU market before being used to package products exempt from the
scope of BPR, they would be fully covered by the treated article rules of BPR.

9
REACH Guidance on requirements for substances in articles
http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/articles_en.pdf

35
Additional Information

58. Question:

Where can I find information on active substances approved for the use in biocidal
products in the EU, the conditions and restrictions for use, and on substances under
evaluation in the biocides review programme?

Answer:

In general, the European Chemicals Agency's webpage

(http://echa.europa.eu/regulations/biocidal-products-regulation ) contains a wealth of useful
information in relation to biocides and treated articles.

In particular it provides a list of approved active substances

(http://echa.europa.eu/en/regulations/biocidal-products-regulation/approval-of-active-
substances/list-of-approved-active-substances) and the list of active substances and their
suppliers (the so-called Article 95 list, http://echa.europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/active-
substance-suppliers) which gives comprehensive information on all active substances for
which a dossier has been submitted, covering both approved active substances and active
substances under evaluation.

Moreover, the opinions of the Biocidal Products Committee (BPC) of ECHA on active
substances are published on the BPC website, and may contain pertinent information for
their use in treated articles (http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/regulations/biocidal-products-
regulation/approval-of-active-substances/bpc-opinions-on-active-substance-approval ).

Additional questions can be addressed to the national helpdesks in individual EU

Member States or the helpdesk of ECHA (see list of contact points at
http://echa.europa.eu/support/helpdesks).

36
 Appendix 1

Product Examples

The examples below are indicative and refer to the typical categorisation of a listed product group. The assessment of whether any individual
product is a treated article, a biocidal product or neither of the two must be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account all its
characteristics.

Biocidal product Treated article Not a treated article

Disinfecting wipe Article in which a disinfectant was incorporated to Components or intermediate forms which were
generate an antimicrobial surface (e.g. chopping disinfected (which are not themselves placed on
board or equipment in the production of foodstuff) the EU market)
An article which has been disinfected (in the form as
it is placed on the EU market) to render it sterile or
reduce contamination
Wooden article, or wooden components of a Wooden components of a complex article, or an
complex article, impregnated with an insecticidal intermediate form of a wooden article (which are
wood preservative in order to protect it from not themselves placed on the EU market) that
becoming infested have been treated with an insecticide (e.g. by
fumigation) in order to remove a present
infestation
Wooden article treated with an insecticide (e.g. by
fumigation) in order to remove a present infestation
Paper made of paper pulp (cellulose)
Speciality paper incorporating a preservative in order incorporating a preservative in order to protect the
to protect the finished article during use such as anti- pulp (an aqueous mixture) during storage before
mould treated papers use in the manufacturing of paper; equally
incorporation of a preservative in other
intermediates such as starch, pigments, coatings
or fillers during storage
Paper resulting from a production process where
slimicides were used in order to avoid slime
development in the paper machine and in the
process water system
Mixtures like paints, glues, inks, detergents, etc. Complex articles containing e.g. glues, inks,
containing an in-can preservative paints which had in-can preservatives added in
order to protect them during storage, where these

37
 preservatives have no further function in the
finished good
Paint, detergents, etc. containing an additive, and
that additive had an in-can preservative added in
order to protect its during storage, where this
preservative has no further preserving function in
the final product
Paints and coatings containing a fungicide to fight Paints and coatings containing a preservative that
existing mould infestations (anti-mould paint) extends the durability of the applied layer
Paints and coatings intended to prevent microbial
settlement and growth in order to provide a germ-
free environment e.g. in hospitals
Complex articles containing e.g. paints, adhesives
which contain a film preservative in order to protect
the paint/glue layer during use of the article
Leather goods (shoes, seats) treated with a fungicide
protecting the leather from decay
Textiles, or textile components of complex articles,
treated with a preservative in order to increase
durability of the fabric (also when used in multi-
component articles)
Mosquito net treated with an insecticide or insect Textiles, or textile components of complex articles,
repellent treated with an insecticide in order to protect the
fabric from destruction by insects
Insect-repelling bracelets Clothes treated with an insect repellent
Clothes treated with a biocidal product in order to
control odour-forming bacteria (also when used in
multi-component articles)
Kitchen sponge treated to inhibit microbial growth
during use
Plastic articles, or plastic components of complex Plastic articles or plastic components of complex
articles, incorporating a preservative that protects articles, made of ingredients (monomers,
them against harmful organisms and increases polymerisation aids, etc.) which contained
durability of the material preservatives in order to protect them during
storage and manufacture, where these
preservatives have no further function in the
finished good

38
Antifouling paints Fishing or aquaculture equipment and boats treated
with antifouling products
Stuffed animals, which have been impregnated with
taxidermist fluids containing (e.g. insecticides or
preservatives)

39
 Appendix 2

Extracts from Regulation (EU) No 528/2012

Article 3
Definitions

1. For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) ‘biocidal product’ means

— any substance or mixture, in the form in which it is supplied to the user,

consisting of, containing or generating one or more active substances, with the
intention of destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action
of, or otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any
means other than mere physical or mechanical action,

— any substance or mixture, generated from substances or mixtures which do

not themselves fall under the first indent, to be used with the intention of
destroying, deterring, rendering harmless, preventing the action of, or
otherwise exerting a controlling effect on, any harmful organism by any
means other than mere physical or mechanical action.

A treated article that has a primary biocidal function shall be considered a biocidal
product.
[…]
(l) ‘treated article’ means any substance, mixture or article which has been treated
with, or intentionally incorporates, one or more biocidal products;

Article 4
Conditions for approval

[…]

3. The approval shall specify the following conditions, as appropriate:

[…]

(d) manner and area of use including, where relevant, use in treated articles;

[…]

Article 58
Placing on the market of treated articles

40
1. This Article shall apply exclusively to treated articles within the meaning of Article
3(1)(l) that are not biocidal products within the meaning of Article 3(1)(a). It shall
not apply to treated articles where the sole treatment undertaken was the fumigation
or disinfection of premises or containers used for storage or transport and where no
residues are expected to remain from such treatment.

2. A treated article shall not be placed on the market unless all active substances
contained in the biocidal products that it was treated with or incorporates are
included in the list drawn up in accordance with Article 9(2), for the relevant
product-type and use, or in Annex I, and any conditions or restrictions specified
therein are met.

3. The person responsible for the placing on the market of a treated article shall ensure
that the label provides the information listed in the second subparagraph, where:

— in the case of a treated article containing a biocidal product, a claim is made by

the manufacturer of that treated article regarding the biocidal properties of
the article, or

— in relation to the active substance(s) concerned, having particular regard to the

possibility of contact with humans or the release into the environment, the
conditions associated with the approval of the active substance(s) so
require.

The label referred to in the first subparagraph shall provide the following
information:

(a) a statement that the treated article incorporates biocidal products;

(b) where substantiated, the biocidal property attributed to the treated article;

(c) without prejudice to Article 24 of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the name of

all active substances contained in the biocidal products;

(ca) the name of all nanomaterials contained in biocidal products, followed by the
word "nano" in brackets;

41
 (d) any relevant instructions for use, including any precautions to be taken
because of the biocidal products with which a treated article was treated or
which it incorporates.

This paragraph shall not apply where at least equivalent labelling requirements for
biocidal products in treated articles to meet information requirements concerning
those active substances already exist under sector-specific legislation.

4. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, the person responsible for placing on the market of a

treated article shall label it with any relevant instructions for use, including any
precautions to be taken, if this is necessary to protect humans and the environment.

5. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, the supplier of a treated article shall, upon request by

a consumer, provide, within 45 days, free of charge, information on the biocidal
treatment of the treated article.

6. The labelling shall be clearly visible, easily legible and appropriately durable.
Where necessary because of the size or the function of the treated article, the
labelling shall be printed on the packaging, on the instructions for use or on the
warranty in the official language or languages of the Member State of introduction,
unless that Member State provides otherwise. In the case of treated articles, which
are not produced as part of a series, but rather designed and manufactured to meet a
specific order, the manufacturer may agree other methods of providing the customer
with the relevant information.

42
 Article 94
Transitional measures concerning treated articles

1. By way of derogation from Article 58(2), a treated article treated with or intentionally
incorporating one or more biocidal products containing only active substances that are under
examination for the relevant product-type in the work programme referred to in Article 89(1)
on 1 September 2016 or for which an application for approval for the relevant product-type is
submitted by that date, or containing only a combination of such substances and active
substances included in the list drawn up in accordance with Article 9(2) for the relevant
product-type and use or included in Annex I, may be placed on the market until one of the
following dates:

(a) in the case of a decision adopted after 1 September 2016 to reject the application
for approval of, or not to approve, one of the active substances for the relevant
use, the date falling 180 days after such a decision;

(b) in other cases, the date of approval for the relevant product-type and use of the
last active substance to be approved and contained in the biocidal product.

2. By way of further derogation from Article 58(2), a treated article treated with or
intentionally incorporating one or more biocidal products containing any active substances
other than those referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article or those included in the list drawn
up in accordance with Article 9(2) for the relevant product-type and use or included in
Annex I, may be placed on the market until 1 March 2017.

ANNEX V

BIOCIDAL PRODUCT-TYPES AND THEIR DESCRIPTIONS

AS REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 2(1)

MAIN GROUP 1: Disinfectants

These product types exclude cleaning products that are not intended to have a biocidal effect,
including washing liquids, powders and similar products.

Product-type 1: Human hygiene

Products in this group are biocidal products used for human hygiene purposes, applied on or
in contact with human skin or scalps for the primary purpose of disinfecting the skin or scalp.

43
Product-type 2: Disinfectants and algaecides not intended for direct application to humans
or animals

Products used for the disinfection of surfaces, materials, equipment and furniture which are
not used for direct contact with food or feeding stuffs.

Usage areas include, inter alia, swimming pools, aquariums, bathing and other waters; air
conditioning systems; and walls and floors in private, public, and industrial areas and in other
areas for professional activities.

Products used for disinfection of air, water not used for human or animal consumption,
chemical toilets, waste water, hospital waste and soil.

Products used as algaecides for treatment of swimming pools, aquariums and other waters
and for remedial treatment of construction materials.

Products used to be incorporated in textiles, tissues, masks, paints and other articles or
materials with the purpose of producing treated articles with disinfecting properties.

Product-type 3: Veterinary hygiene

Products used for veterinary hygiene purposes such as disinfectants, disinfecting soaps, oral
or corporal hygiene products or with anti-microbial function.

Products used to disinfect the materials and surfaces associated with the housing or
transportation of animals.

Product-type 4: Food and feed area

Products used for the disinfection of equipment, containers, consumption utensils, surfaces or
pipework associated with the production, transport, storage or consumption of food or feed
(including drinking water) for humans and animals.

Products used to be incorporated into materials which may enter into contact with food.

Product-type 5: Drinking water

Products used for the disinfection of drinking water for both humans and animals.

MAIN GROUP 2: Preservatives

Unless otherwise stated these product-types include only products to prevent microbial and
algal development.

Product-type 6: Preservatives for products during storage

Products used for the preservation of manufactured products, other than foodstuffs,
feedingstuffs, cosmetics or medicinal products or medical devices by the control of microbial
deterioration to ensure their shelf life.

Products used as preservatives for the storage or use of rodenticide, insecticide or other baits.

44
Product-type 7: Film preservatives

Products used for the preservation of films or coatings by the control of microbial
deterioration or algal growth in order to protect the initial properties of the surface of
materials or objects such as paints, plastics, sealants, wall adhesives, binders, papers, art
works.

Product-type 8: Wood preservatives

Products used for the preservation of wood, from and including the saw-mill stage, or wood
products by the control of wood-destroying or wood-disfiguring organisms, including
insects.

This product type includes both preventive and curative products.

Product-type 9: Fibre, leather, rubber and polymerised materials preservatives

Products used for the preservation of fibrous or polymerised materials, such as leather,
rubber or paper or textile products by the control of microbiological deterioration.

This product-type includes biocidal products which antagonise the settlement of micro-
organisms on the surface of materials and therefore hamper or prevent the development of
odour and /or offer other kinds of benefits.

Product-type 10: Construction material preservatives

Products used for the preservation of masonry, composite materials, or other construction
materials other than wood by the control of microbiological, and algal attack.

Product-type 11: Preservatives for liquid-cooling and processing systems

Products used for the preservation of water or other liquids used in cooling and processing
systems by the control of harmful organisms such as microbes, algae and mussels.

Products used for the disinfection of drinking water or of water for swimming pools are not
included in this product type.

Product-type 12: Slimicides

Products used for the prevention or control of slime growth on materials, equipment and
structures, used in industrial processes, e.g. on wood and paper pulp, porous sand strata in oil
extraction.

Product-type 13: Working or cutting fluid preservatives

Products to control microbial deterioration in fluids used for working or cutting metal, glass
or other materials.

MAIN GROUP 3: Pest control

Product-type 14: Rodenticides

45
Products used for the control of mice, rats or other rodents, by means other than repulsion
or attraction.

Product-type 15: Avicides

Products used for the control of birds, by means other than repulsion or attraction.

Product-type 16: Molluscicides, vermicides and products to control other invertebrates

Products used for the control of molluscs, worms and invertebrates not covered by other
product types, by means other than repulsion or attraction.

Product-type 17: Piscicides

Products used for the control of fish, by means other than repulsion or attraction.

Product-type 18: Insecticides, acaricides and products to control other arthropods

Products used for the control of arthropods (e.g. insects, arachnids and crustaceans), by
means other than repulsion or attraction.

Product-type 19: Repellents and attractants

Products used to control harmful organisms (invertebrates such as fleas, vertebrates such as
birds, fish, rodents), by repelling or attracting, including those that are used for human or
veterinary hygiene either directly on the skin or indirectly in the environment of humans or
animals.

Product-type 20: Control of other vertebrates

Products used for the control of vertebrates other than those already covered by the other
product-types of this main group, by means other than repulsion or attraction.

MAIN GROUP 4: Other biocidal products

Product-type 21: Antifouling products

Products used to control the growth and settlement of fouling organisms (microbes and
higher forms of plant or animal species) on vessels, aquaculture equipment or other structures
used in water.

Product-type 22: Embalming and taxidermist fluids

Products used for the disinfection and preservation of human or animal corpses, or parts
thereof.

46
 ANNEX VI

COMMON PRINCIPLES FOR THE EVALUATION OF DOSSIERS

FOR BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS

[…]

14. A risk assessment on the active substance present in the biocidal product shall
always be carried out. If there are, in addition, any substances of concern present in
the biocidal product then a risk assessment shall be carried out for each of these. The
risk assessment shall cover the proposed normal use of the biocidal product, together
with a realistic worst-case scenario including any relevant production and disposal
issue. The assessment shall also take account of how any "treated articles" treated
with or containing the product may be used and disposed of. Active substances that
are generated in-situ and the associated precursors shall also be considered.

[…]

47
 Appendix 3

CA-Sept14-Doc.6.1 (revision of Dec. 2014)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION
DIRECTORATE-GENERAL
ENVIRONMENT
Directorate A – Green economy
ENV.A.3 - Chemicals

NOTE FOR DISCUSSION WITH COMPETENT AUTHORITIES FOR BIOCIDAL PRODUCTS

Subject: Treated articles

This document is an attempt to provide guidance in the interest of consistency, and has been
drafted by the Commission services responsible for biocidal products with the aim of finding
an agreement with all or a majority of the Member States' Competent Authorities for biocidal
products. Please note, however, that Member States are not legally obliged to follow the
approach set out in this document, since only the Court of Justice of the European Union can
give authoritative interpretations on the contents of Union law.

1. Background and purpose of the document

Concerns were raised by various stakeholders (trade and industry associations, third
country governments; see document CA-March14-Doc.6.1) that the current interpretation
of the BPR provisions on treated articles as laid down in the Note for Guidance 10: will
pose serious practical problems for business operators.

To allow successful implementation of Article 58 of the BPR, it is necessary to ensure that

it is practically possible for business operators to comply with the rules, and for
enforcement authorities in the MSs to assess compliance. Therefore the Commission has
critically reviewed the interpretation currently provided in the Note for Guidance and
proposes the following understanding and approach for the implementation of Article 58,
which is considered appropriate to maintain a high level of consumer protection while at
the same time decreasing the burden on business operators.

2. Proposed approach

Article 3(1) (l) of the BPR defines a treated article as '…any substance, mixture or article
which has been treated with, or intentionally incorporates one or more biocidal products'.
10
CA-Sept13-Doc.5.1.e, Frequently asked questions on treated articles, endorsed by the CA meeting in
September 2013,

48
As indicated in Article 58 (2) to (4), the provisions of Article 58 apply to treated articles
in the form in which they are placed on the EU market (in the following also referred to as
"finished goods").

The definition of "treated with or intentionally incorporates" in Article 3 implies that the
treatment with or incorporation of a biocidal product is made with the intention to confer a
biocidal property (or even a biocidal function) to the treated article and would thus lead to
a beneficial and desired effect in the finished good (e.g. protecting it from bio-degradation
during storage or use). Following this notion of "treated with or intentionally
incorporating", it is appropriate to exclude biocidal treatments or incorporation of biocides
in a substance, mixture or article, or individual constituents thereof, which were made in
the course of manufacturing merely in order to perform a specific biocidal function at that
stage of the process, but which will not have an intended biocidal effect in the finished
good as placed on the EU market.

In the case of "complex" articles made up of different components and/or materials, it is

unlikely that the treatment or incorporation of a biocidal product concerns uniformly all
components/materials. Nevertheless, one or several individual components/materials of a
complex article may have been treated with or incorporate a biocidal product, and the
biocidal property or function conferred to these components/materials may still be
beneficial for the finished good as such (e.g. by increasing overall durability of the
complex article). Such complex articles should also be regarded as treated articles.

3. Criteria to identify treated articles

In practice, the decision whether a finished good is a treated article will have to be taken
principally on two levels: firstly by the person responsible for placing the good on the EU
market (typically the manufacturer or the importer), and secondly by the enforcement
authorities responsible for checking compliance with the rules applicable to a certain
good. Indications whether a biocidal treatment has an intentional biocidal effect in a
finished good can come from the criteria listed below. They can be used on both of these
levels, but probably to varying extents, as not all the relevant information may be
available on each of these levels. A decision on whether a good placed on the EU market
intentionally incorporates a biocidal product and thus is considered a treated article will
always have to take into account all characteristics of the article (including claims) and
any available knowledge on the biocidal treatment made during production.

Important elements to consider for such a decision are:

i) Claims concerning a biocidal property or function of the finished good or part

thereof:

Claims on a finished good have an important role in indicating the intentional

presence of a biocidal active substance that exerts a beneficial and indented effect.

In all cases where a claim concerning a biocidal function of a finished good is made,
it is evident that the presence of a biocidal active substance in the finished good is
intended by the manufacturer. Such goods will always be considered treated articles,
if, based on their overall characteristics, they do not qualify as a biocidal product
themselves.

49
 Also a claim on a biocidal property (i.e. that the finished good is protected against
bio-degradation) clearly indicates an intentional presence of a biocidal active
substance in the finished good. Moreover, also more implicit claims not directly
referring to a biocidal action but e.g. concerning an increased durability or anti-odour
properties of a textile can be taken as an indication that the presence of a biocidal
active substance in the good is intentional. In this case, the good would be considered
a treated article unless the manufacturer/importer can present convincing justification
that the claimed property is not due to the biocidal treatment that has led to the
presence of the biocidal active substance.

If a biocidal active substance is present in the finished good, the absence of a claim
does not automatically imply that the presence of the substance is unintentional. In
these cases, other criteria like the available knowledge on the biocidal treatment made
during production, on the uses and effective concentration of the active substance
present, its concentration, need to be considered to decide whether the finished good
qualifies as a treated article.

ii) The PT of the biocidal product used for the treatment:

Knowledge about the biocidal treatment and the biocidal product used for this
purpose, including the PT it is authorised for, are the best source of information to
determine whether the presence of a biocidal active substance in a finished good is
intentional or not. However, if a biocidal active substance is present in a finished
good, and no information is available on the biocidal treatment that lead to this
presence, the PT(s) for which an active substance is approved in the EU may give
indications about whether its presence is intentional or unintentional (see table
below).

PT1 (human Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing AS that fall
hygiene into this PT are likely to be classed as biocidal products due to their
disinfectants) use and the nature of the biocidal effect.

PT2 (disinfectants) Chemical substances or mixture containing active substance that fall
into this PT are likely to be classed as biocidal products due to their
PT3 (veterinary use and the nature of the biocidal effect.
hygiene products)
The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in an article
PT4 (food and feed generally indicates an intended effect in the final good, and such
area disinfectants) articles, if not biocidal products by themselves, would qualify as
treated articles

PT5 (drinking water Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing active
disinfectants) substance that fall into this PT are likely to be classed as biocidal
products due to their use and the nature of the biocidal effect.

PT6 (preservatives Biocidal products of PT6 are widely used to preserve products during
for products during storage. If the preserved good goods (a chemical substance or mixture
storage) or an article) itself is placed on the market it qualifies as a treated
article.

Chemical substances and mixtures containing an in-can preservative

may however be further used as ingredients in the manufacturing

50
 process of other finished goods. If the in-can preservative of such an
ingredient has no further intended biocidal function later in the
finished good, the residual presence of preservatives stemming from
preserved ingredients should not qualify the finished good as a treated
article.

Also solid components used in the manufacture of a complex finished

article may incorporate a PT6 preservative. In such cases it needs to
be considered whether the preservation is relevant only during storage
of this component (and not later in the finished article), or whether the
preservation is also beneficial during the storage and possibly use of
the finished article. In the first case, the finished article does not
qualify as a treated article. In the latter case, the finished article would
have to be considered a treated article.

PT7 (film The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in a chemical

preservatives) substance or mixture or an article generally indicates an intended
effect in the final good and such articles would qualify as treated
articles

PT8 (wood Biocidal products of PT8 (wood preservatives) will usually be used
preservatives) with the intention to provide long-term preservation of the wood,
which would continue to be effective in the finished good, which
would thus qualify as a treated article.

Exceptions to this may be PT8 biocidal products used at saw-mill

stage or during initial storage, which only serve to protect the wood at
this stage from harmful organisms (e.g. short-term preservation of
freshly cut wood with fungicides to prevent the discoloration caused
by blue stain forming fungi until further processing), or curative
treatments of wood before being manufactured into a finished good.
Articles made at a later stage from wood that has undergone such
treatments should not be considered treated articles.

PT9 (fibre, leather, The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in a chemical

rubber and substance or mixture or an article generally indicates an intended
polymerised effect in the final good and such articles would qualify as treated
materials articles
preservative)

PT10 (construction
material
preservatives)

PT11 (preservatives Biocidal products of PT 11 are likely to be used mainly in closed

for liquid-cooling systems. Any traces of the active substance in finished goods
and processing produced in the facility using them should be considered unintentional
systems) and thus do not qualify the good as a treated article.

However, preserved cooling or processing liquids as well as systems

containing them, have to be considered treated articles when they are
placed on the market.

PT12 (slimicides) Biocidal products of PT12 are used in industrial processes to control

51
 slime growth at certain stages. Any traces of the active substance in
finished goods should be considered unintentional and thus do not
qualify the good as a treated article. However, any liquids, fluids etc.
containing slimicides, when placed themselves on the market, have to
be considered treated articles.

PT13 (working or Cutting or working fluids are used at certain stages of the production
cutting fluid process. Any traces of the preservative of such fluids in finished
preservatives) goods should be considered unintentional and thus do not qualify the
good as a treated article. However, any working or cutting fluids
containing preservatives, when placed on the market, have to be
considered treated articles.

PT14-17, 20 Any chemical substance, mixture or article containing active

(vertebrate pest substance that fall into these PTs are likely to be classed as biocidal
control) products due to their use and the nature of the biocidal effect.

PT18 (insecticides) Chemical substances or mixture containing active substance that fall
into this PT are likely to be classed as biocidal products due to their
PT19 (repellents and use and the nature of the biocidal effect.
attractants)
The incorporation of biocidal products of this PT in an article
PT21 (antifouling generally indicates an intended effect in the final good, and such
products) articles, if not biocidal products by themselves, would qualify as
treated articles
PT22 (embalming
and taxidermist
fluids)

iii) The concentration of the AS in the final article:

The use of some biocidal products in certain production processes is likely to leave
only traces, of biocidal active substances in the finished good. Preserved chemical
mixtures that serve as ingredients for products will typically be diluted during
production, so that the remaining concentration of in-can preservatives in the finished
good is likely to be below the range where they would be effective. The presence of
such low, non-effective, concentrations of a biocide, together with the absence of any
other indication that their presence in the finished good is intentional, may provide an
indication that the finished good should not be considered as a treated article with
regard to those active substances.

However, there may be cases where a biocidal active substance is present in a

finished good at a concentration at which it could potentially exhibit biocidal activity,
but this presence is still due to a use in an upstream step in production and the activity
is neither intended by the manufacturer nor beneficial for the final article (e.g. the
remaining presence of an in-can preservative in a dried glue or paint layer in/on an
article, where preservation of the dried matrix is no longer required). In cases where
an active substance in sufficient concentration to be active is present in an article or in
a part thereof, it needs to be decided on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the
nature and features of the article (including claims) and knowledge on the biocidal
treatment made during production, whether the finished good qualifies as a treated
article or not with regard to those active substances.

52
 The above criteria may be applied equally to finished goods manufactured in the EU, or
such imported from non-EU countries. In the latter case, however, the available
information on biocidal treatments made during manufacture may be less available and the
onus is on the importer to provide justification that the presence of a biocidal active
substance present in the good is not intentional. Enforcement authorities may encounter
finished goods that are imported from third countries and which contain a chemical that
has potentially a biocidal activity, but is not approved, included in Annex I to BPR or
under review as a biocidal active substance in the EU. In such cases, it will need to be
decided in the first place whether this presence is due to a biocidal use of the chemical, or
whether it has been used for other purposes than that. If a biocidal use is suspected or
established, the above criteria, apart from criterion ii) concerning PTs, can be used as
indications on whether the good should be considered as a treated article or not. The onus
is on the person responsible for the placing on the EU market to justify that the chemical
has not been used for biocidal proposes, or if it has, that the remaining presence of the
active substance it in the finished good is not intentional and that it confers no intended
biocidal property. In case the finished good does not qualify as a treated, the chemical
having potential biocidal activity does not need to be approved as biocidal active
substance/included into Annex I/under review in EU.

Treatments that do not confer a biocidal property to the finished good, but remove
manifest infestations (e.g. disinfection of an article, fumigation with an insecticide), may
lead to significant residues when done on the finished good. Such goods should also
qualify as treated articles. However, treatments made on intermediate forms, or on
individual components of a complex article or a mixture are excluded, unless these are
themselves placed on the EU market (e.g. supplied to another manufacturer).

The table annexed to this document11 lists a number of examples illustrating the
application of the above interpretation to different kinds of articles and mixtures.

11
As an expanded version of the table originally presented in the annex to this document has been taken
over into the present Note for Guidance on treated articles as Appendix 1, it is not again reproduced in
this appendix.

53