Alliance Solved Assignment Solution
Alliance Solved Assignment Solution
Sir/ Madam
You can call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail
him at palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question.
If urgent or any query’s, Please feel free to call him on his mobile no.
9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on palaniappanmail@gmail.com.
He does help/guide for the below question
Show the Accounting Equation on the basis of the following transactions and prepare a
Balance Sheet.
Rs.
1. Maharajan commenced business with cash 2,50,000
2. Purchased goods for cash 70,000
3. Purchased goods on credit 80,000
4. Purchased furniture for cash 30,000
5. Paid rent 22,000
6. Sold goods for cash (costing Rs.45,000) 60,000
7. Paid to creditors 20,000
8. Withdrew cash for private use 10,000
9. Paid salaries 25,000
10. Sold goods on credit (cost price Rs.60,000) 80,000
Problem 3 (5 marks)
st
Startech Ltd. acquired a machine on 1 October 2015 at a cost of Rs.60,00,000. It charges
depreciation on straight line method at the rate of 12% every year. The company purchased
st
a new machine worth Rs.15,00,000 on 1 April 2017. Show the Machinery Account and
st
Depreciation Account for the year ending 31 March 2016, 2017 and 2018.
Problem 4 (10 marks)
The following are the key Financial Ratios of Hindustan Unilever Ltd for the year 2015 to
2019. Analyze the different ratios and give suitable relevant interpretations for each
category of ratios.
Book
Value[ExclRevalReserve]/Shar 36.5 33.8 31.32 30.52 18.7
e (Rs.)
Book
Value[InclRevalReserve]/Shar 36.5 33.8 31.32 30.52 18.7
e (Rs.)
Revenue from
181.99 164.56 153.53 149.01 147.78
Operations/Share (Rs.)
Profitability Ratios
Liquidity Ratios
Coverage Ratios
Valuation Ratios
MarketCap/Net Operating
9.38 8.12 5.93 5.84 5.91
Revenue (X)
Retention Ratios (%) 24.9 25.27 20.21 18.96 25.61
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail him at
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question. If urgent or any query’s, Please
feel free to call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question
Assignment
Principles of Management
Read the case given below and answer the questions that follow
Helping or Hurting?
Exit interviews were usually handled by junior managers on the HR team, but Amrita felt that given the high rate of attrition among doctors
at Krisna Hospital over the past year, it was her responsibility as head of HR to talk to Dr. Vishnu Patel, a respected cardiologist who’d just
given his notice. “Everyone is always very polite in these interviews, but I need your honesty,” Amrita told him. Dr. Patel shifted in his chair.
“There are a host of reasons for my departure, many of which you can’t do anything about. My family obligations, for example, and the
demands in my own practice.” Most of the physicians at Krisna saw patients in their private practices, but they also partnered with and
referred patients to the hospital for procedures that weren’t possible in an office setting. As the largest multispecialty hospital in Noida, in
the National Capital Region of India, Krisna provided secondary and tertiary services in cardiology, orthopedics, neuroscience, oncology,
renal care, and gastroenterology. “Is there anything that would’ve made you stay? Anything in particular that made you decide to leave
now?” Amrita prodded. “There was that argument I had with a PCE,” Dr. Patel said after a pause. He was referring to a relatively new
position in the hospital: the patient care executive. Three years ago, in response to patient complaints about not understanding doctors’
explanations about their diagnoses and treatments, Krisna had introduced this liaison role. It was meant to be a win-win: Patients and their
families would get a better, more personalized hospital experience, and doctors could spend less time managing patients and more time
practicing medicine.
The program fit well into the hospital’s brand as an expensive but high-quality care center with the best talent, technologies, and services.
Unfortunately, Amrita had heard grumbling from physicians from the moment she’d hired the first PCE. Dr. Patel explained how the PCE
assigned to one of his more complicated cases—a patient who had bypass surgery and needed a pacemaker—had caused the patient’s
family to lose trust in him. “I don’t know what he said to them during the operation, but from then on, they wanted to talk only with him and
acted like I was an enemy. It was definitely the PCE and the family against me.” “To make matters worse,” he continued, “he gave them
misinformation about the pacemaker, and when I tried to explain that he’d been wrong, they didn’t believe me.” It was true that Krisna’s
PCEs didn’t have medical training. Most had MBAs but only a few years of experience in health care. And Dr. Patel wasn’t the first to
complain about PCE interference in the doctor-patient relationship. But thanks to higher customer-satisfaction scores, senior leaders were
happy with the PCEs. “Is the PCE program the reason you’re leaving us?” Amrita asked. Dr. Patel reluctantly admitted that it was. “To be
honest, it just makes the job that much harder. I already have to answer to the patient, the patient’s family, and the administration. Now I
also have to answer to the PCE. It’s too many people to please. Why wouldn’t I prefer to work in a hospital that doesn’t interfere in the same
way?” Amrita didn’t have a good response, and she was pretty sure Dr. Patel wasn’t expecting one. “Could we convince you to change your
mind?” she asked instead. “Fire that
PCE. Actually, fire them all. And let us doctors do our jobs. Then maybe I’ll stay.” LEAVING IN DROVES Later that day, Amrita sat down
at a table in the hospital’s cafeteria with Meera Kumar, Krisna’s chief medical officer. The two executives had worked together for
nearly 20 years, and despite their hectic schedules, they tried to meet for lunch each month.
Amrita was still thinking about her conversation with Dr. Patel and broached the issue of PCEs with Meera. “I wish I could tell you that
he is an anomaly,” Meera said, “but he’s not. Many of our doctors are unhappy about the PCEs.” “Why didn’t you tell me this earlier?”
Amrita asked. “I did. You said, ‘Give it time.’” Amrita smiled sheepishly. Meera continued, “I know I’m biased because of my position,
but I agree with my physicians that the PCEs are unnecessary and, in a lot of cases, do more harm than good. From the stories I hear,
they seem inexperienced and intrusive. They understand the lingo, but they don’t really understand medicines and treatments.”
“That’s not fair,” Amrita said. “It’s not as if they’re making medical decisions for patients. The doctors are still in complete control. The
PCEs are just helping patients better comprehend their options.” “That’s not what I hear,” Meera said. “A doctor told me that a PCE
talked one of his patients out of an important diagnostic test because she was having panic attacks about the procedure. The doctor
tried to explain that they could treat the anxiety and that the test was critical, but the PCE wouldn’t budge.” Amrita took a breath,
about to speak. “I know what you’ll say,” Meera cut in. “‘That’s one bad apple.’ But I hear more stories like that every day. This is why
our doctors are leaving in droves.” The hospital’s attrition rate had been between 20% and 25% for the past 18 months. It was true
that because of the current doctor shortage across India, many hospitals were fighting talent wars, but Krisna ranked among the worst
on this metric. And it was the only medical center to have the patient care executive role. Amrita was beginning to wonder if they
were ahead of the pack or venturing in the wrong direction. GOOD OR BAD ATTRITION? A week later, Ghiridhar Iyer, Krisna’s CEO,
called Amrita and Jai Srinivasan, the head of patient services, to his office to discuss doctor turnover.
He explained that the issue had come up at the last board meeting. “Have we identified any patterns or root causes?” he asked.
Amrita glanced at Jai, and then answered, “There are the usual reasons, of course, but I’m starting to wonder about the PCE position.”
She could see Jai tense up next to her. The PCE program had been his baby, and his body language suggested he would not take
criticism well. Still, she pressed on, summarizing her conversations with Dr. Patel and Meera. “We wouldn’t need PCEs if the doctors
had a better bedside manner,” Jai interrupted. “I’m sick of trying to keep them happy at all costs. We are a ‘patient-focused care
center,’” he said, citing Krisna’s mission statement. “Yes,” said Ghiridhar, “but we can’t deliver patient care if we don’t have doctors.”
Krisna’s compound annual growth rate was 82%, and it had been struggling to keep positions filled. “There is no doubt that the PCE
program has been great for the hospital,” Amrita said, hoping to defuse Jai’s agitation. “Revenue is up, as are patient retention rates
and referrals—” “That’s right,” Jai said. “When we treat patients with dignity and care, they come back to our hospital for all their
health concerns and tell their friends and families to come here as well. And the customer satisfaction scores say it all: They love the
PCEs.” “We aren’t debating that,” Ghiridhar said. “Who wouldn’t love a person whose primary job is to hold your hand through a
difficult time? The question is: What are we losing as a result?” Jai jumped back in. “I don’t believe that the PCEs are driving the
doctors out. I think the doctors are tired of splitting their revenue with us. And they’re not happy that the patients would rather come
to see the PCEs than go to the doctor’s private practice. They’re also jealous that the PCEs get paid no matter who comes through the
door.” At Krisna, and most Indian hospitals, physicians’ salaries reflected the number of patients they treated. “We could consider
more training,” Amrita suggested. “We did sessions when we launched the role, but maybe it’s time to bring the doctors and PCEs
together again to share best practices.”
“We had enough trouble getting the doctors to show up the first time,” Jai said. “What we need to do is find doctors who believe in
the hospital’s mission and want to collaborate— not put their own interest first.” “According to Meera, those are exactly the doctors
we’re losing,” Amrita said. “We all know that there is good attrition and bad attrition, and Meera assures me that we’re now dealing
with the bad kind.” “This is a top priority for me,” the CEO said. “I know where you stand, Jai. And I agree that we need to be careful
not to alienate patients. But we don’t want this to escalate into a crisis. We need to think about remedies.” AN EMOTIONAL DECISION
On the elevator ride down from the CEO’s office, Amrita replayed the meeting in her mind. She took issue with Jai’s characterization of
the doctors as money-hungry and selfinvolved. She knew that most of them could live comfortably on the revenue from their private
practices, but they chose to take on challenging cases and bring them into the hospital, splitting the revenues, because they wanted to
help people. If PCEs were making the doctors’ jobs more difficult, she had to do something about it. The elevator stopped, and the
doors opened. A woman stepped in, crying into her cell phone. “They don’t seem to care if he lives. They do test after test, but no one
decides what to do. The only person I trust is Karthik.” Amrita recognized the name. He was a recently hired PCE, and when the doors
opened again on the first floor, the man she remembered was waiting there. He caught Amrita’s eye but then focused his attention on
the woman, who fell into his arms sobbing. They spoke quietly, then hugged again. As Amrita watched them, she couldn’t help but
think that the PCEs were indeed filling a critical role. She doubted any of Krisna’s competitors were providing this level of service.
Amrita now felt weepy herself. This was business, yes, but emotions invariably played a huge role. She needed to make sure that both
doctors and patients trusted Krisna to do right by them.
1. Identify (giving justifications) the external environmental factors that predominately played dominant role in influencing
the above mentioned situation. (10 marks)
2. According to you what are the strengths and weakness of the organization? (10 marks)
3. Suggest ways by which the situation can be dealt with. (10 marks)
4. Identify and explain any one of the management principles that accordingly to you would be useful in justify the your
suggestion (s) as par question no. 3 (10 marks)
N.B. Each answer is expected to be written within the word limit of 150 words
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail him at
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question. If urgent or any query’s, Please
feel free to call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question
BC Assignment
Max Marks : 40
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail him at
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question. If urgent or any query’s, Please
feel free to call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question
TERM 1
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR & HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT
Total :40 Marks (Part A- 10 Marks +Part B- 30 Marks)
(One case study{CS} from OB and One case study from HR) -(2CS X5M=10 Marks)
Ramesh Ambani was appointed as Operations Planning Manager in the Surepleasure Airlines last month. Immediately after
reporting to his new job, Ramesh recognized that there were difficulties with the time control section. This section consisted of
sixteen junior clerks, eight senior clerks and a supervisor who reported to him.
The basic function of time control section is to maintain records of all rotatable parts used on a fleet of eighty-five passenger
aircraft. Records reflect the date on which a part was installed or removed and total aircraft flying time. To maintain
identification, serial numbers are recorded for each controlled part. The Airport Authority rules require strict control of parts
having limited life. Parts that have operated beyond their approved limit have to be removed and overhauled.
The problem that Ramesh noticed was that there were numerous instances of inaccurate records. The records were in violation
of Airport Authority regulations and poor record-keeping resulted in excessive overhaul costs. When Ramesh studied the
situation, he observed that the employees had formed an extremely strong informal work-group. The members would accept or
reject new employees into the work-group based on factors completely unrelated to the job. Some outsiders observed that if a
new employee's behavior was not in tune with the informally determined norms, he or she had little chance of success within
the group.
The group members arranged for contributory dine-and-dance party every week-end and had a great time together. Those who
did not like to participate and socialize were ignored and 'made to feel uncomfortable to the point that they would quit the
organization. This resulted in an annual turnover rate of approximately 200 percent. Ramesh realized that this problem had to
be solved immediately or major problems could result for the Sure pleasure Airlines in future.
Questions
(a) What are the dysfunctions of informal organization in the Surepleasure Airlines?
(c) What suggestions would you give to the management of this company to cope with the informal organization?
2. Read the following case carefully and answer the questions given at the end :
In 1995 Ford Motor Company announced a major reorganization called "Ford 2000". The idea, championed by
Chairman and CEO, Alex Trotman and Vice Chairman Edward E. Hagenlacker, eliminated more than a dozen
engineering design centers around the world and consolidated them into only five - of which four are in Dearborn,
Michigan, and one in Europe. The one in Europe was responsible for creating one basic design for small cars for the
world market and then making minor modifications for local markets. For example, the same template will be used in
Europe, South America, and Asia. The four design centers in Dearborn will do the same for large front-wheel-drive
cars, rear-wheel-drive cars, pick-up trucks, and commercial vehicles. The consolidation effort requires that more than
twenty-five thousand salaried employees relocate or at least report to new managers. Manufacturing and assembly will
still take place in plants around the world.
The purpose is to integrate Ford's operations around the world and revolutionize the way it designs and builds more
than seventy lines of cars and trucks, which it sells in more than two hundred markets. The goals are reduced
duplication of effort, increase volume purchasing, save more than $4 billion per year, and double profitability. All this
for a company that made $3.8 billion profit from automotive operations in 1995, and $5.3 billion overall. Trotman
continues to have the support of the Ford family, two still controls 40 percent of the voting stock in the company.
Part of the new plan is a top-secret strategic document that outlines every new car and truck Ford will design,
produce, and sell around the world through 2003. The plan calls for reducing the basic design platforms from 24 to 16
and increasing the total number of models by 50 percent, while saving billions of dollars, For example, the new 1996
Taurus serves as the platform for several other models, both in the United States and around the world.
In structure, the new system is really a matrix. Rather than working in a functional organization with traditional
hierarchies and centralized decision making, employees are assigned to a design centre, such as small cars, and then
to a group according to their specialties, such as drive trains. Managers then mediate the disputes that occur between
the design centers and the specialties. Employees will have to change their ways of doing their work as they design
cars and trucks to fit global markets rather than a single, relatively homogeneous one. Management knows that
employees feel a great deal of insecurity and uncertainty about the company and their jobs as they make the shift.
Carrying the message to all employees has been a constant Job for Trotman and Hagenlacker since the original
announcement.
Management also knows that Ford tried a similar design integration with their "World Car" in the late 1970s, which
failed primarily due to turf battles among designers and engineers. The cars that resulted were rarely the cost savers
Ford hoped for and were so dull in their design that no one bought them. Trotman expects different results this time
because of the consolidation of the design centers, the new organization structure, and because advances in
technology have made the inner working of cars so similar that only the outer, visible portions of the cars need to be
different to satisfy regional tastes.
By mid-1996, however, the reorganization was not going so well. The transition had left many employees still
wondering whom they worked for and with a feeling that everything was out of control. The culprit seems to have
been a reorganization of the reorganization! Trotman now plans to reduce the number of design centers from five to
three. People are moving and reporting relationships are changing once again. Group Vice President Jacques A.
Nasser, who may succeed Trotman by 1998 or so, has promised $11 billion in savings under the new system. Some
have claimed that the "new" reorganizations really puts things back the way they were before the first reorganizations.
However, three design centres is a lot fewer than the dozens that existed before. But this second reorganization,
before employees really got settled into the first one, may have devastating effects. Suppliers and employees do not
know whom to contact to get questions answered or disputes resolved. All they get on the phone is voice mail, since
everyone is in meetings trying to work out the new reorganization. Top management claims that these problems are
inherent trying to turn around such a big organization that has been relatively successful through the years. They say
that the organization needs to evolve to meet their ambitious goals and the competition.
Questions:
(a) Describe the changes in structure that Ford expects from the Ford 2000.
(b) How do you explain the continuing problem that employees are having with adapting to the new structure of Ford
2000?
3. Read the following case carefully and answer the questions given at the end :
Mr. Anand occupies No. 2 position in the Corporate Planning Department of multi-product company having a turnover
of more than Rs. 900 crores and operating in a high technology (hi-tech) industry. For the last five years, Anand has
been associated with strategic planning of the company and recently he has been deputed to a task force to
reorganise the company to cope up with the changing technology and environment.
At the last meeting of the Board of Directors of the company, the members expressed their concern about the falling
competitive position of the company in the industry. The main reason cited by the Chief Executive was the outdated
organisation structure which has not undergone any change for the last 10 years though the size, technology and
environment of the company have changed tremendously. It was on the advice of the Chief Executive that the Board
of Directors decided to set up a task force for the company's reorganisation.
At the first meeting of the task force, Anand, who is an expert in planning, convinced the other members to adopt the
following procedure :
(i) Determine exactly what type of structure the company has at present.
(ii) Determine the type of environment the company faces now and the weaknesses of the present structure.
(iii) Forecast the environmental changes in the future and the type of technology to be used by the company.
(iv) Design the organization structure to meet the future challenges.
It was discovered that the company is currently structured along classical lines and the company is operating in a
highly dynamic environment. The environment in future is likely to be more uncertain because of fast changes in
technology and requirements of customers and competition by MNCS. The task force came to the conclusion that the
structural design must be responsive to change and if this is not done, the company's survival in the market would be
made more difficult.
Questions:
(a) How far do you agree with the procedure adopted by the task force?
(b) Explain how the system and contingency approaches can contribute to the analysis of this case.
(c) What type of organisation design should the task force recommend ? Explain its broad features.
Microelectronics, a California-based electronics defense contractor, has enjoyed a smooth growth curve over the past five years,
primarily because of favourable defense funding during the Reagan administration's build-up of U.S. military defenses.
Microelectronics has had numerous contacts to design and develop guidance and radar systems for military weaponry.
Although the favourable funding cycle has enabled. Microelectronics to grow at a steady rate, the company is finding it increasingly
difficult to keep its really good engineers, Based on extensive turnover analyses conducted by Ned Jackson, the human resources
planning manager, Microelectronics problem seems to be its inability to keep engineers beyond the "critical" five year point.
Apparently, the probability of turnover drops dramatically after five years of service. Ned's conclusion is that Microelectronics has
been essentially serving as an industry college. Their staffing strategy has always been to hire the best and brightest engineers
from the best engineering schools in the United States.
Ned believes that these engineers often get lost in the shuffle at the time they join the firm. For example, most (if not all) of the
new hires must work on non-classified projects until cleared by security to join a designated major project. Security clearance
usually takes anywhere from six to ten months. In the meantime the major project has started, and these young engineers
frequently miss out on its design phase, considered the most creative and challenging segment of the program. Because of the
nature of project work, new engineering often have difficulty learning the organizational culture - such as who to ask when you
have a problem, what the general dos and don'ts are, and why the organization does things in a certain way.
After heading a task force of human resource professionals within Microelectronics, Ned has been designated to present to top
management a proposal designed to reduce turnover among young engineering recruits. The essence of his plan is to create a
mentor program, except that in this plan the mentors will not be the seasoned graybeards of Microelectronics, but rather those
engineers in the critical three-to-five year service window, the period of highest turnover, These engineers will be paired with new
engineering recruits before the recruits actually report to Microelectronics for work.
According to the task force, the programme is twofold : (1) it benefits the newcomer by easing the transition into the company, and
(2) it helps the three-to-five-year service engineers by enabling them to serve an important role for the company. By performing
the mentor role, these engineers will become more committed and hence less likely to leave. As Ned prepared his fifteen-minute
presentation for top management, he wondered it he had adequately anticipated the possible objections to the program in order to
make an intelligent defense of it. Only time would tell.
Questions :
(a) Identify the salient issues from HR point of view for this case.
(b) lf you were to study this turnover problem, how would you conduct a needs analysis or evolve a counselling programme ?
(d) Do you find the mentoring programme suitable to reduce turnover ? Justify your answer .
2.Read the following case carefully and answer the questions given at the end.
The eleven workers whose annual increments were stopped made a representation to the management of XYZ Limited
that the action taken was not justified and that they wanted to know what was their fault. The management which
acted upon the recommendation of the department head concerned, Mr. Rog, felt guilty because such an action was
taken for the first time in the history of the company.
XYZ Limited was a large paper manufacturing company in South India. The major departments of the factory were:
1. Chemical processing: The raw material was mixed with certain chemicals for making pulp.
2. Pulp department: Pulp was mixed with other ingredients according to specifications for each order of paper.
3. Paper machine department : This was the heart of the factory where processed pulp was fed into the paper
machines. Act first, a wet weak paper was formed which was subsequently dried and rolled.
4. Finishing department : The paper rolls were then moved to the processing department where the required coating
was given.
Twenty eight workers worked in the paper machine department in four groups - each group attending one machine.
The nature of the work on each machine was such that all the seven workers had to work in cooperation. Because no
individual tasks could be specified, the group was made responsible for the work turned out by them. All the workers
working in the paper machine department had been with the company for over ten years.
The company did not have any incentive wage system for any class of its employees. They were all given straight
salaries with normal annual increments. The annual increments were sanctioned each year in a routine way. It was the
policy of the company that the increments should not be stopped unless the department head concerned
recommended such an action.
Mr. Rog was placed in charge of the paper machine department a year ago. Though Mr. Rog was a newcomer in the
organisation, he proved himself to be a very competent man. The management noted that he was very aggressive and
enthusiastic and that he know his job well. At the end of the year when increments were due to be sanctioned, he
recommended to the management that the increments due to eleven men in his department should be stopped, for, in
his opinion they were lazy and inefficient. The eleven men concerned belonged to all the four groups operating in the
department.
The management, though puzzled about the action recommended by Mr. Rog, acted upon it and sropped the
increments due to the eleven men concerned. The management were aware that such an action was the first of its
kind in the history of the company. Most of the employees were with the company for a fairly long period and there
was never an instance of strained relations between the management and the employees.
Soon after the action was taken, the eleven employees concerned made a representation to the management
requesting them to let them know whatr was wrong with their work as to warrant stopping of their increments. The
management were in a fix because they did not have specific reasons to give except Mr. Rog's report in which he
simply mentioned that the eleven men concerned were "lazy and inefficient".
The management were naturally concerned about the representation and therefore, they tried to ascertain from Mr.
Rog the detailed circumstances under which he recommended the stoppage of increments. When Mr. Rog could not
pin-point the reasons, the management suspected that Mr. Rog's recommendation was based on his "impressions"
rather than on facts. They, therefore, advised Mr. Rog to maintain a register from then on noting the details of day to
day incidents of "lazy and inefficient" workers and obtain the signatures of the workers concerned. Mr. Rog was to
make the final appraisal of each worker in his department on the basis of this register and recommend each case
giving specific reasons why increments should be stopped.
Mr. Rog started maintaining a register as suggested by the management; but he found it difficult to report
satisfactorily any case of laziness or inefficiency for want of specific reasons.
The management were convinced that their action of stopping increments of eleven men on the strength of Mr. Rog's
report was not a proper one. They realised that no similar action in future would be taken based on inadequate
information. But, they were wondering whether the suggestion made to Mr. Rog was the proper course of action to
prevent occurrence of similar situations.
Questions :
(b) Was management of the company justified in implementing the recommendations of Mr. Rog, in the absence of
proper report ?
(c) How would you view the action of Mr. Rog, if you were the M.D. of the company ?
(d) Do you think the reward system instituted by the company needs to be reviewed ? Substantiate your answer with
logic.
3. Read the case and answer the questions given at the end.
SEWA - The purposeful beginning
SEWA (Self Employed Women's Association) was started in 1972, by Ela Bhatt, in the form of a union of the
unorganized sector, which was to be incorporated into the mainstream. It was observed that most of the production of
goods and services in the country was, at that time, done through the informal sector, and hence the decision was
taken iounionise this informal sector.
SEWA was not like a typical union i.e., unlike the usual union of workers, it (SEWA) spoke about the solidarity of the
workers themselves. It's purpose was fight for the mega system which exploited the vast working force through its
labor contract systems. The whole system typically involves the middlemen and money lenders and the mindsets of
the urban middle class, the educated, the upper castes, their perceptions of development. Thus, through SEWA,
efforts were made to question the whole system of policy making, the census (which had not recorded them as
workers), the definition and purpose of a trade union and the definition of 'worker'.
After the registration of SEWA as a trade union, it was found that the union activity stopped at a certain level and the
informal sector workers were hardly covered by any protective labour legislation. Added to this, profit making,
handling of cash etc., even sometimes caused conflicts of interest in the union. Hence, over a period of time, a
strategy of joint action by union and cooperative - a member based, democratic organization, beneficial to the
unprivileged of society with networks at the state level, national level and international level was chosen.
It was felt that through a cooperative presence, SEWA would be able to obiatn bargaining power for all those who are
members as well as for those who were not a part of the co-operative. On the one hand, the producer's labour value
goes up and she enjoys a better bargaining power. Alongside, the other workers in the villages also have wider choices
in taking decisions related to who and how many have to go for work on the farms, whether the workers should
migrate or concentrate on home-based crafts and so on. And, on the other hand, for all those who were not a part of
SEWA, their wage structure (for both men and women) goes up. For instance, in case of the agricultural workers : the
new jobs create a shortage of labour in the region, so they also get higher wages. Similarly, artisans also get higher
wages. In this way SEWA is able to bring about economic changes in the villages through the joint action of the union
and cooperative.
In spite of unionizing the self-employed workers, it was found they faced two common problems:
Shortage of capital, forcing the workers to pay a heavy interest (often paying 10% interest per day).
Absence of owning their own means of productions (like handlooms, push carts etc.). They had to pay rent on these
from their own meagre income.
These two reasons prompted the decision at SEWA to have their own bank. In a period of six months, the necessary
share capital was collected, and SEWA tried for registration. But many objections were raised - How can SEWA have
cooperatives and a bank ? How to form a bank for workers who were women, undependable, unreliable and who
cannot even sign ?
Inspite of these inhibitions, the strongest point in their favour was that the workers were all economically independent
and generating cash every day. Thus, it was necessary for them to save money and also be able to avail of credit,
whenever necessary, rather than depending upon private money lenders. This necessity finally led to the birth of the
SEWA Bank.
The SEWA Bank is about one of the 10 co-operatives in SEWA with five kinds of primary co-operatives - dairy,
artisans, traders, services and labour. The SEWA Bank has a working capital of about Rs. 26 crores, while, the other
co-operatives registered under SEWA together have a working capital of Rs. 20 crores. When SEWA discovered that
many of its workers were unable to absorb more loans because of the many risks and outside forces which did not
allow them to expand their business, it decided to offer another form of financial services like insurance schemes -
against maternity risk, group insurance scheme to link all member workers with their deposits and integrated social
insurance bank service covering a wide range of services.
Other Activities and Vision for the Future
SEWA has attempted to create co-operatives of various services provided by the labour community especially in the
areas of domestic labour, health care, child care and video production. So as to enable these persons' to market their
services, efforts are being made to provide them training on a continuous basic.
Another effort on the pari of SEWA is to build a management system which wil help the labour force to stand firm in
the market. Such a system should not only help these people to have access to credit but also help them to be literate
enough to have a basic understanding of accounting, the interest rates and accessibility to market infrastructure.
Another attempt of SEWA has been at coming together of women on a common platform, on the basis of work in the
form of co-operatives/union/federations or as workers or producers or economic agents, cutting across barriers of
caste, region and language.
The vision of Ela Bhatt, who started SEWA has always been to ensure that the informal sector is in the mainstream of
labour movement with a leading role to be played by the rural women. SEWA'S aim has been to empower such women
who are poor and illiterate to become economically active through the process of empowerment. This view is slowly
becoming a reality, when, after joining SEWA and attending formal training programmers, such women have become
bold, realized their sense of self through participating, facing, managing situations and other people and thus learning
to become 'leaders' in the true sense. Thus process of empowerment has enabled them to develop an inbuilt strength
to do liaison with the police, take up the causes of fellow workers, actively participate in the decision making process
especially while sitting on committees, travelling and meeting people for the growth of the organization.
At SEWA, there is no formal organisation structure as such. In the words of Ela Bhatt, "SEWA is like a banyan tree, it
grows and takes root, then these roots grow and take root...." i.e.. SEWA's growth is totally dependent on its
mernbers who become owners, managers, beneficiaries and a truely empowered organisation in the long run.
Questions :
(b) Discuss the worker oriented development approach of SEWA affecting the performance.
Can you suggest ways in which private corporate organisations can also be involved in developing management
programmes along with SEWA for the upliftment of the rural people ?
PART B
Answer any Six Questions.Answer to the point and briefly with examples ( 6Qx5M=30M)
1. Define, what is Organizational Behaviour and state why it is importance to study Organizational Behaviour?
2. Describe three level of organization and discuss ethical behavior of formal and informal organization with examples?
3. Define HRM Function in Business Organization? What are the various challenges faced by H R Managers in
managing employees in today’s Industrial Organization
6. Identify steps in decision making process in an organization and explain with example?
7. Distinguish between Attitude and Aptitude and how will you explain this with reference to organization?
8. Define motivation?Explain motivation with either Maslow’s Need Hierarchy theory or Herzbergs Two Factor Theory?
9. What is difference between a Leader and a Manager?Explain basic difference between the trait ,behavioral and
contingencies types or categories of leadership theory?
10. Define group and work team.Explain the benefits organization and individuals derive from working in team
11. Define conflict and negotiation in organization and Explain the nature of conflicts in organizations?
12. Describe the steps involved in selection process and explain the challenges when using social media for recruitment
purpose?
13. What is fundamental goal of Training and Development? Explain how training aids organization to achieve that
goal /Explain how development aids organization in achieving that goal?
14. What is performance appraisal and Management? Explain briefly how compensation and rewards are integrated
with performance appraisal?
15. What is Industrial relations and labour laws? Discuss India’s growth in industrial relations under five phases (From
1950 to 2020)?.
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail him at
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question. If urgent or any query’s, Please
feel free to call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question
Marketing assignment
Reflect on the organization you are currently working in (or immediately prior to this) as to how this brand currently uses
various elements of the integrated marketing mix while delivering value to its target market. Study across all the marketing
mix elements and analyse the extent to which they are used in this brand’s integrated marketing programs. You should
consider how all the marketing mix elements such as the product (brand), promotions (marketing communications), place
(distribution) and price connect with the company’s target market.
3. Evaluate whether your company possesses the equity of a loyal customer base. Identify the reasons for its high/low
customer loyalty.
4. If you opine that the company suffers from low customer loyalty, provide your recommendations to ensure unflinching
loyalty.
Note :
All assignments should be original in content. Plagiarism from public sources or from other submissions will categorically
disqualify the submission.
If essential, students are encouraged to make references to reliable sources* (such as business books, academic texts,
research papers, industry articles, etc.) but the content of the same should not be plagiarized while creating your
assignments.
* Students are expected to give credit for such references, by citing the specific sources in the reference list (to be provided
towards the end of the assignment file).
Alliance Solved Assignment Solution
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail him at
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question. If urgent or any query’s, Please
feel free to call him on his mobile no. 9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on
palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question
MARUTISUZUKIINDIALIMITED:SUSTAININGPROFITABILITY
INDIANPASSENGERCARMARKET
TheIndianpassengercarmarketwasthefastestgrowinginAsia,drivenbyIndia’slargepopulationof
1.28billionandalowpenetrationoffewerthan12carsper1,000people(seeExhibit2).Priortothe
1990s,theIndianautomobilesectorwasinpoorshapecomparedtotheautomobilesectorsinother
countries,largelybecauseofdemand-sideconstraintssuchasthelowpurchasingpoweroftheaverage
Indianconsumer.Before India’seconomic liberalization, themajority ofIndia’spopulation couldnot afford tobuy
acar,and carpenetrationwasless than threeper1,000 people.Afterliberalization,with risingincomelevelsofmiddle-
classfamilies,thedemandforpassengercarswentupsteadilyoverthe next20years.However,carpenetrationwasstillvery
lowcompared to inBrazil,Russia,China and developedcountries(seeExhibit2).From asupply-
sideperspective,theautomobileindustryhadgreatly benefitedfrom
liberalization,asinternationalautomobilemanufacturerstookadvantageofIndia’s
affordableyethighlytrainedengineers,establishingmanufacturingoperationsthroughoutthecountry.
DuetoIndia’shugepooloftalentandrising incomelevels,India’spassengercarmarkethadgrownin termsofproduction and
4
salesand wasexpectedto growfurtherincoming years.
PassengervehiclesinIndiacouldbebroadlydividedintothreesegments—passengercars,utility vehiclesandmulti-
purposevehicles—withpassengercarscontributing around 80percentoftotalsales
volumes.Asof2014,thissegmentwasexpected togrowatacompoundannualrateof15per centfor the
next15to20years.Apartfromdomesticgrowth,automobileexportsfromIndiawerepredictedtogrow
at12percent.Itmaybenotedherethat,inalowpercapitaincomecountrylikeIndia,two-wheelers (motorcyclesand
scooters)constituted amajormodeof transportation forthelowermiddleclass,who wouldeventually graduate tothesmall-
carsegment.Inmostcitiesandtowns,duetothepoorquality of roadsandexcessivetrafficcongestion,motorcycleswere
thefirstchoice fordailycommutes.However,a carwasconsideredaprized possessionforamiddle-
classIndianfamily,eventhoughitwasnotusedona
dailybasis.Withrisingincomelevels,thisheldgreatpromiseforcarmanufacturers,asfewerthan12
peopleper1,000ownedacarin India, reflectinghugemarketpotential.
MAJORCOMPETITORSOFMARUTI
ThereweremanyplayersinthepassengercarsegmentinIndia.Someoftheseplayersweredomestic, suchasMaruti,
TataandMahindra.OtherssuchasHyundai,HondaandToyotawerefrom otherAsian countries. Thetwo companies
withthelargestmarketsharein Indiawere Maruti,at49 percent,and Hyundai,at21 percent (seeExhibit 3for trends in the
marketshare ofMarutiand itscompetitors).
AlthoughthereweremanyplayersintheluxurysegmentofthemarketsuchasMercedes-Benz,BMW
andAudi,therewerefewbuyerswhohadtheincometosupportsuchpurchases. Therewereother
competitorsforMarutisuchasFord,GM,Nissan,Renault,ŠkodaandVolkswagenthatcompetedin mini- andmid-
segmentcars. Thesecompanieshadtakenconsiderablemarketsharefrom Marutiinrecent years.
MARUTI:THECOMPANY
Establishedin1981,MarutienjoyedthelargestmarketshareintheIndianpassengercarsegment.In 2014, Maruti, withtwo
production facilitiesatGurgaon and Manesar(bothin theNationalCapitalRegion ofDelhi),had
5
aproductioncapacityofmore than 1.4million unitsperyear. Theproduction facilities had
6 7
morethan 12, 000 employees and produced more than 16 automobile models, eachwith multiple
8
variants. ExamplesofMaruti’sproductofferingsincludedsmallcarsliketheMarutiAlto,WagonRand A-
9
Star.Smallcarsmadeup41.2percent ofMaruti’stotalsalesunits.Inthecompactcarsegment,
MarutiofferedcarssuchastheSwift,Estilo,Ritz andCelerio.This segmentmadeup24percentof
Maruti’stotalsales.Inthemid-sizesegment,thecompanyofferedtheSX4andDzire,whichcontributed
19.1percentofsales. Thesportutilityvehiclesegmentmadeup just5.8percentofsalesandcontributed less to
Maruti’sprofitsthansmallandmid-segmentcars.Finally,inthevanssegment,the company was knownfortheOmniand
Eeco,whichcontributed9.6percenttoitsoverallsales. Theremainingsales camefrom othermodelsofMaruticars.From
theMaruti800 in1983up to thelaunchoftheCelerio in February 2014,Marutihad
rolledoutmodelaftermodelandexceededcustomerexpectationsin termsof qualityand value formoney.
COMPETINGWITHMARUTICARS
Marutihadimplementedveryfewpriceincreasesinitspassengercarsegmentsoverthelast10–12years.
Nonetheless,competitorshademergedineachofthesesegments.OutofMaruti’s16carmodels,each
modelhadanywherefrom onetosevenclosecompetitorsfrom Hyundai, TataMotors,Volkswagen,
Toyota,HondaorChevrolet(seeExhibit5).However,despiteintensecompetition,Marutihadretained
itsleadershippositionin mostsegments.Infact,itwassopervasiveabrand thatsomeofitsmodels competedamong
themselves.Forexample, itsAltomodelcompetedwith the Maruti800, and the Wagon Rcompetedwith
theRitz.Marutihadmaintained its “people’scar” imagesinceitsinceptionby
strategicallykeepingpriceslowandpositioning entry-levelcarsforfirst-timebuyers.Mini-segmentcars,
whichconstitutedmore than80percentofMaruti’s totalsales,carried price tags thatwereatleast20–30 percentlower
thanthoseoftheirnearestcompetitors.
INPUTCOSTS
Thepricesofrawmaterialsforcarshadrisensignificantly since2001.Basicmetalpriceshadincreased sharply,exceptfor
thepriceofaluminum.Steelwas themajorrawmaterialforcars,andthepriceofsteel had increasedbyatleast
13
threetimes(seeExhibit7)since2001. Apartfrom steel,otherinputsfor
automobilessuchascopper,leadandrubber(seeExhibit7)hadgoneupincostbyatleast240percent.
Eventhepriceofaluminumhadexperiencedamarginalriseof7percent.Theonlyrawmaterialfor
whichtherehadbeennosignificantprice risewaspalladium,butitsusageincar-making wasrelatively negligible.Apartfrom
thesematerials,thepricesofothermaterialsandinputssuchaselectricityandfuel
hadgoneupduringthesameperiod.Theriseininputpriceshadbeenasmuchas300–400percent. Specifically,
steelandrubberpriceshad significantly raised thecostofproduction.
LabourCosts
The costoflabourhadgoneupsignificantly dueto therise ingeneralprice levels(inflation) inIndia. Though
Marutidepended heavilyon contractuallabourers tocutdown onlabourcosts, ithad to keeppace
withthemarketintermsofcompensationandperksinordertoretainemployees.Thewagedisparity
betweenMaruti’sregularemployeesandcontractualemployeesinthepasthadledtoHR issues thathad
14
givenMarutimuchbadpublicity.ThetragediesoftheManesarplant hadforcedMarutitorevisitthe
compensationpackagesgiventoitsemployees. Thishad resulted in furtherrisingemployeecosts. The
employeecosthadbeena mereINR1.99billionin2001,buthad risentoINR10.69billionin2013–2014 (seeExhibit6).Itmay
benotedthatalong withMaruti’scosts,thelabourcostsperunitfor itscompetitors had alsorisen
accordinglyduringthesametimeperiod.
SellingCosts
KEEPINGDOWNCOSTS
FUELPRICESANDDEMANDFORPASSENGERCARS
TheriseinthepriceofcrudeoilhadnothelpedthecauseoftheautomobilesectorinIndia.Fuelprices
hadincreased,whichsignificantlyimpactedthegrowthofthesector.In2014,whileaddressingthe
media,MarutichairmanR.C.Bhargavainfactput the blamefordeclining sales squarely on increases in
thepricesofpetrolanddiesel. Thesepriceshadincreasedby20percentinthelasttwoyears,adversely impactingcarsales.
ThepriceofpetrolwasderegulatedinIndiaandwaslinkedtocrudeoilprices. The priceofcrudeoilhadincreasedfrom
$25.64perbarrelin2001 toaround$110perbarrelin2014(see Exhibit7).Apartfrom
theriseincrudeprices,localtaxesonpetroleumproducts wereveryhighinIndia,
whichfurtherraisedtheprices.Thedieselpricewasregulatedandkeptlowthroughsubsidies.This
helpedcarmanufacturerslikeMarutitochargeapremiumondieselcars.However,thepriceofdiesel wasslowly being
deregulatedinIndia. Withanewuniongovernmentthatwasfirmly focused onreforms,
thedieselpricewouldsoonbederegulated.Oncethisoccurred,dieselvariantsofcarswouldlosetheir
edgeoverpetrolvariants.Thederegulateddieselpricewouldfurtheradverselyimpactthedemandfor automobilesin India.
PROFITABILITY
Marutihadbeenabletomaintainasteadyriseinprofitsdespitechallengesthatwerebeyondthecontrol
ofthecompany,suchasincreasedcostsandfuelpricesthataffectedthedemandforcars.In2002,it
16
postedanetprofit ofINR1.04billion,amere1.5percentofnetsales.In2014,Maruti’snetprofitshad risento INR27.83billion
or6.3percentofnetsales (seeExhibit6).Marutiremained focused on maximizing shareholders’wealthdespite
thecompetitivemarketenvironment.Each year,Maruti’sfinancialresultsexceededmarketexpectations.
DECISIONTOENTERGUJARAT
EXHIBIT1:DOMESTICSALES,EXPORTSANDTOTALSALES(UNITS)OFMARUTICARS
2013-14 1155041
2012-13 1171434
2011-12 1133695
2010-11 1271005
2009-10 1018365
2008-09 792167
2007-08 764842
2006-07 674924
2005-06 561822
2004-05 536301
2003-04 472122
2002-03 362426
2001-02 352404
Total Exports Domestic
2000-01 350814
Source:VariousannualreportsofMaruti;“OurFinancials,”MarutiSuzuki,www.marutisuzuki.com/financial.aspx,accessed
September12,2014.
EXHIBIT2:MOTORVEHICLEPRODUCTION,CARPENETRATIONANDPERCAPITAINCOMEOF
SELECTCOUNTRIES
EXHIBIT3:TRENDSINMARKETSHAREOFMARUTIANDITSCOMPETITORSININDIA
(MarketSharein Percentages)
(INRin hundredthousand)
MarutiSwift SX4
Maruti Maruti Hyundai Tata Chevrolet Dzire VXI
Year AltoLX 800 Santro Indica Spark LXI
Aug-02 2.99 2.81 3.36 3.19 ** ** **
Apr-03 2.99 2.56 3.36 3.17 ** ** **
Nov-03 2.87 2.56 3.46 3.14 ** ** **
Apr-04 2.65 2.26 3.3 3.14 ** ** **
Aug-06 2.81 2.24 3.24 2.75 ** ** **
Sep-07 2.81 2.2 3.28 3.38 3.09 ** 6.18
Oct-08 2.82 2.29 3.48 3.65 3.17 4.89 6.54
Jun-09 2.57 2.06 3.21 3.29 3.17 4.54 6.36
Feb-10 2.5 2.21 3.44 3.38 3.19 4.6 6.68
Oct-11 3.01 2.22 3.76 3.24 3.54 5.32 7.73
Apr-12 3.01 2.22 3.76 3.24 3.75 5.3 7.73
Sep-13 3.12 2.42 3.76 3.4 3.57 5.38 7.73
Apr-14 ^^ ^^ 3.66 3.85 3.45 4.85 7.15
EXHIBIT5:MARUTI
’SCOMPETITORS
BYMODEL
EXHIBIT6:YEARWISEREVENUE,COSTSANDNET
PROFITSFORMARUTI
EXHIBIT7:TRENDSIN
COMMODITYPRICES(MAJORRAWMATERIALS),2001–2014
1. Outline the important determinants of demand for automobiles. How are cross and
income elasticity of demand relevant to Maruti’s managerial decisions? (10 Marks)
2. What are economies of scale? Where do the economies of scale for Maruti come
from? (10 Marks)
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail
him at palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question.
If urgent or any query’s, Please feel free to call him on his mobile no.
9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on palaniappanmail@gmail.com.
He does help/guide for the below question
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail
him at palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question.
If urgent or any query’s, Please feel free to call him on his mobile no.
9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on palaniappanmail@gmail.com.
He does help/guide for the below question
a. What is the probability that a randomly selected customer spends less than $85
at this store?
b. What is the probability that a randomly selected customer spends between $65
and $85 at this store?
c. What is the probability that a randomly selected customer spends more than
$45 at this store?
d. Find the dollar amount such that 80% of all customers spend at least this
amount.
e. Find two dollar amounts, equidistant from the mean, such that 90% of all
customer purchases are between these values. 10 marks
4. Using the Excel Home Market Value
a. Identify if there is any outlier in square feet and Market Value
b. Draw a scatter plot and infer about correlation
c. Identify the dependent and independent variable(s)
d. Fit a simple linear regression ( Market value on Square feet)
e. Predict the market value for 1450 square feet
f. Calculate coefficient of determination and comment 10 marks
You can call him on his mobile no. 09025810064 (whatsapp available) or mail
him at palaniappanmail@gmail.com. He does help/guide for the below question.
If urgent or any query’s, Please feel free to call him on his mobile no.
9025810064 (whatsapp available) or do mail on palaniappanmail@gmail.com.
He does help/guide for the below question